The frequency-dependent behaviour of subpulse drifting: I. Carousel geometry and emission heights of PSR B0031-07

G. Wright; N. D. R. Bhat; S. E. Tremblay; S. J. McSweeney; S. Kudale

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

The frequency-dependent behaviour of subpulse drifting: I. Carousel geometry and emission heights of PSR B0031-07

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read PSR B0031-07's three drift modes trace to one rotating carousel with 15, 14, or 13 sparks, and its frequency-dependent subpulse shifts give emission heights.

desk verdict A genuinely new AR-augmented carousel model with an honest but under-supported application to B0031-07; the height numbers are conditional on assumptions the authors themselves show to be shaky. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03677 v1 pith:G6LLEX4E submitted 2019-08-10 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR

S. J. McSweeney , N. D. R. Bhat , G. Wright , S. E. Tremblay , S. Kudale This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR

keywords subpulsedriftingcarouselmodelPSRB0031-07driftmodesaliasingaberrationandretardationpulsaremissionheightsradiopulsars

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the three drifting-subpulse modes (A, B, and C) of PSR B0031−07 are not separate carousel rotations but one carousel rotating at a single period of about $\overline{P}_4 = 16.4$ pulse periods, with the number of sparks changing by one between modes ($n_A,n_B,n_C = 15,14,13$) and the different drift rates produced by first-order aliasing. A consequence is that the three values of $\overline{P}_3$ are harmonically related, which the paper confirms from existing measurements. The paper then extends the carousel model to include aberration and retardation, including the time it takes the spark-pattern information to travel from the surface to the emission point. Assuming those effects dominate, the measured frequency-dependent subpulse phase shifts translate into emission-height differences of $\lesssim 2000$ km for mode A and $\lesssim 1000$ km for modes B and C between 185 and 610 MHz. If correct, this gives a new, independent way to measure pulsar emission heights and a potential test of the carousel model.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the carousel geometry relation between the subpulse modulation period $\overline{P}_3$, the number of sparks $n$, the carousel rotation period $\overline{P}_4$, and the aliasing order $k$: $1/\overline{P}_3 = |n/\overline{P}_4 - k|$, together with the condition that $n$ changes by an integer while $\overline{P}_4$ is constant. The AR extension adds the usual aberration-retardation phase shift $\phi' \approx \phi - 2r'$ (with $r' = r/r_{\rm LC}$) and the $r'$ delay of the spark-pattern information, which combine to give the constant slope $\Delta\theta'/\Delta\phi' = -n/(2\overline{P}_4)$ used to convert measured subpulse phase-track shifts between two frequencies into emission-height differences.

What would settle it

A single-telescope wide-band observation of B0031−07 spanning 185–610 MHz would remove the unknown clock offset; if the subpulse phase-track shift then yields negative height differences (low-frequency emission lower than high-frequency) or heights incompatible with independent estimates, the AR-dominance assumption is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that B0031−07's three drift modes are one physical carousel: the modulation is set by a fixed carousel rotation period $\overline{P}_4 = 16.4$ while the number of sparks takes the values $[n_A,n_B,n_C] = [15,14,13]$ in the three modes, and the different observed drift rates follow from first-order aliasing, $1/\overline{P}_3 = |n/\overline{P}_4 - k|$ with $k=1$. The paper further claims that once aberration and retardation are added, including the finite travel time of the spark-pattern information from the surface to the emission point, the frequency-dependent subpulse phase-track shift has a fixed slope $\Delta\theta'/\Delta\phi' = -n/(2\overline{P}_4)$, so that a measured phase shift between two frequencies directly gives the emission-height difference $\Delta r'$. Applied to simultaneous 185 MHz and 610 MHz observations, this yields conservative height differences of $\lesssim 2000$ km for mode A and $\lesssim 1000$ km for modes B and C.

Load-bearing premise

Aberration and retardation, together with the retarded travel of the spark-pattern information, dominate every other frequency-dependent shift of the subpulse phase at 185 and 610 MHz, so that observed phase shifts can be converted directly into emission-height differences.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

B0031−07's three drift modes are the same carousel: only the number of sparks changes, so its carousel rotation period is fixed at about 16.4 pulse periods.
The $\overline{P}_3$ values of modes A, B, and C should be harmonically related, as observed, and any multi-mode drifting pulsar with a constant $\overline{P}_4$ and integer-changing spark count should show the same arithmetic structure in $1/\overline{P}_3$.
Subpulse phase-track shifts between two frequencies directly give emission-height differences, independent of average-profile or polarisation methods, for pulsars where AR effects dominate.
The AR-augmented model implies that $P_2$ shrinks with frequency through Eq. (27), providing a quantitative, testable relation between pulse-longitude-dependent emission height and observing frequency.
First-order aliasing brings the inferred carousel rotation period close to the theoretical Ruderman–Sutherland value, resolving part of the long-standing discrepancy between observed and predicted $\overline{P}_4$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: the constant-slope relation $\Delta\theta'/\Delta\phi' = -n/(2\overline{P}_4)$ means that any pulsar with known $n$ and $\overline{P}_4$ should show a predictable frequency-dependent tilt of its subpulse phase tracks; a clean null result would falsify the AR-augmented carousel picture as stated.
Editorial inference: comparing heights from this AR method with heights from polarisation position-angle fits on the same pulsar would directly test whether AR effects dominate, as the paper itself notes this dominance is still open.
Editorial inference: the positive fitted index $\eta$ (with $P_2$ varying as $\nu^{0.7}$) contradicts standard radius-to-frequency mapping; if that tension persists in larger samples, the dominant frequency-dependent effect is likely finite spark size or azimuth-dependent field curvature rather than AR.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The real contribution here is the AR-augmented carousel model, not the B0031-07 height numbers. Adding the retarded travel time of spark-pattern information from the surface to the emission point is genuinely new, so far as I can tell, and the derivation from Eq. (15) to Eq. (21) is internally consistent. That gives the paper a solid core that survives even if the specific application to B0031-07 does not.

The geometry solution is also worth taking seriously: the single-carousel-rate, first-order-aliasing interpretation with [15,14,13] sparks and P4 = 16.4 P1 is plausible and does explain the three drift modes and the harmonically related P3 values. The authors are properly careful about the degeneracies here, and they give credit to Rankin et al. and Wright & Fowler for earlier pieces. They are also unusually honest in Section 4.2.2 when the P2 fit gives a positive index that contradicts all known RFM models, and when recent high-frequency P2 measurements contradict the model's prediction. The conclusion that 'either the AR-theory is incomplete or AR effects are not typically the dominant cause' is exactly the right thing to say, and it is already reflected in the abstract's 'assuming these effects dominate.'

The soft spots are real, though mostly acknowledged. The absolute phase shift is not actually measured: the clock offset between MWA and GMRT is unknown, so the height differences in Fig. 6 are functions of an assumed offset. The authors pick a restricted window of offsets and discard the giant-pulse alignment because it gives negative heights. That is a bit too convenient, even if the reasoning is transparent. The AR dominance assumption, as the stress-test note says, is directly undermined by the paper's own P2 analysis, and since the same machinery generates both the phase shift and the P2-frequency relation, the height conversion is on shaky ground. Also, Eq. (6) uses the same measured P3 values to select k and n and then presents the harmonic-P3 check as confirmation; there is some circularity there, though the harmonic check does at least use all three modes.

Who is this for? Pulsar astronomers working on carousel models and drift-mode interpretation. They will find the AR model useful as a framework, even if the specific heights for B0031-07 should be treated as illustrative rather than measured. The paper deserves a serious referee: the algebraic core is new, the limitations are stated rather than hidden, and the model can be tested with better clock-controlled data or single-telescope wideband observations. I would accept it for review and recommend publication after the authors separate the model derivation from the height application more sharply, and perhaps soften the abstract's height numbers to match their own caveats.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes simultaneous MWA 185 MHz and GMRT 610 MHz observations of PSR B0031-07 within the carousel model. It first argues that the three drift modes can be explained by a single carousel rotation period P4 ≈ 16.4 P1 with [nA,nB,nC]=[15,14,13] sparks, attributing the different apparent drift rates to first-order aliasing, and it claims that the resulting harmonically related P3 values are confirmed. It then extends the carousel model to include aberration and retardation plus the travel time of spark information to the emission point, deriving equations that relate the frequency-dependent subpulse phase shift and P2 to emission-height differences. Under the assumption that AR effects dominate, it quotes conservative height differences of ≲2000 km for mode A and ≲1000 km for modes B and C between 185 and 610 MHz. The paper explicitly acknowledges that the inter-telescope clock offset is unknown and that the P2-frequency fit yields a positive index eta that contradicts standard RFM models and high-frequency observations.

Significance. The algebraic derivation of the AR-augmented carousel model, Eqs. (15)-(21) and (24)-(27), is transparent and internally consistent, and the paper is honest about many limitations. If AR dominance could be established independently, the method would provide a new way to estimate emission-height differences from subpulse drifting. However, the headline height estimates for B0031-07 are not measurements: they depend on an uncalibrated clock offset and on an AR-dominance assumption that the paper's own P2 analysis contradicts. The carousel geometry solution is plausible but degenerate and is not independently confirmed by the data. The model derivation is a useful contribution, but the observational application as currently presented overstates what the data support.

major comments (3)

[Section 3.4, Fig. 6] The absolute subpulse phase shift is not actually measured because the MWA-GMRT clock offset is unknown, as the paper states explicitly. The height differences in Fig. 6 are therefore functions of an assumed clock offset, and the quoted upper limits (≲2000 km and ≲1000 km) correspond only to an offset window of roughly −0.5° to 5° that is not independently calibrated. The giant-pulse alignment at −4.2° is rejected solely because it yields negative height differences, so the positive-height requirement is effectively used to select the clock offset. This makes the height claim circular and conditional, and it should be presented as such in the abstract and conclusions.
[Sections 3.3.1 and 4.2.2] The conversion of subpulse phase shifts into emission-height differences via Eqs. (16)-(21) assumes that aberration and retardation dominate every other frequency-dependent effect, an assumption stated explicitly in Section 3.3.1. The paper's own fit of Eq. (27) to historical P2 measurements returns η = 0.70 ± 0.34, and Section 4.2.2 notes that all known RFM models predict a negative index and that recent 1.4 GHz measurements contradict the model's prediction. Section 4.2.2 then concludes that either the AR theory is incomplete or AR effects are not typically dominant. Because the absolute phase shift and the P2-frequency relation are generated by the same AR machinery, this internal inconsistency directly undermines the reliability of the height estimates.
[Section 3.1, Eqs. (2)-(6), Table 3] The derived carousel geometry is degenerate, and the harmonicity check is not independent of the measurements used to construct it. The same P3 values are used both to derive Eq. (6) and to select candidate k and n, and Table 3 lists six acceptable solutions with no goodness-of-fit criterion separating them. The representative solution [nA,nB,nC]=[15,14,13] with P4=16.4 is chosen by plausibility relative to the RS prediction, not determined by the data. The abstract's claim that harmonically related P3 values are 'confirmed' is therefore an overstatement; the analysis demonstrates consistency with the assumed model, not an independent confirmation.

minor comments (4)

[Fig. 6 caption] The caption says 'The dash line at −4.2°'; this should read 'The dashed line at −4.2°'.
[Section 4.2.2] There is a duplicated word in the sentence 'The overall shape of the curve is set by the signs of of dΦ/dϕ′ and η'; 'of of' should be 'of'.
[Section 4.2.1] The phrase 'that would be observered in the absence of AR effects' contains a typo; 'observered' should be 'observed'.
[Sections 2 and 3.4] The by-eye alignment of the average profiles and pulse-stack centres (Figs. 2 and 3) is a limitation that should be stated explicitly in the main text, not only in the figure captions, because it affects the absolute phase offsets on which the height estimates depend.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the carousel parameters are fit transparently from the measured periods, and the AR phase/height relation is an algebraic extension rather than a renamed input.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and algebraically transparent. Section 3.1 starts from the carousel alias relation Eq. (2), explicitly notes the degeneracy in k and P4, and solves for n/k using the previously published P3 measurements (McSweeney et al. 2017b); the harmonic-P3 relation Eq. (3) is a direct consequence of the constant-P4 and arithmetic-n ansatz, and checking it against the measured P3 values is a consistency test, not a fitted prediction, because Eq. (3) is derived before the n/P4 solution is selected. Section 3.2 likewise solves the viewing-geometry constraint from measured P2 without renaming an input as an output. The AR extension in Section 3.3 is a new algebraic model (Eqs. 14-27) whose parameters (k, P2, P3, n/P4) are supplied from measured quantities; the height differences in Fig. 6 are presented as a function of the unknown clock offset, and the P2 fit in Eq. (27) is explicitly a fit, not an independent prediction. The paper's own limitations (unknown MWA-GMRT clock offset in Sec. 3.4/4.2.1; admission that "either the AR-theory is incomplete or AR effects are not typically the dominant cause" in Sec. 4.2.2/5) weaken the evidential support for the height estimates, but they are correctness risks rather than circular reductions. Self-citations (McSweeney et al. 2017a,b; Wright & Fowler 1981; Rankin et al. 2013) provide observational data or historical attributions and do not carry the logical load of the derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The main unobserved inputs are the carousel geometry parameters, chosen rather than measured; the assumption that AR dominates; and the unknown inter-telescope clock offset. No new physical particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced.

free parameters (5)

Aliasing order k = ±1 (preferred)
Integer choice in Eq. (2); k = 0 gives implausibly large P4, so first-order aliasing is selected as closest to the Ruderman-Sutherland prediction. Location: Section 3.1.
Carousel spark counts n_A, n_B, n_C = [15, 14, 13] representative
Integral solutions selected to make n_A/Δn near-integer in Eq. (6); consistent but not unique, as Table 3 shows multiple viable combinations.
Carousel rotation period P4 = 16.4 P1
Derived from Eq. (2) using the chosen n and k; not independently measured. Different n and k choices give different P4.
Inter-telescope clock offset = unknown; scanned over roughly 0 to 5 degrees
The MWA-GMRT clock offset was not recorded, so absolute subpulse phase shifts cannot be measured; height differences are plotted as a function of this offset in Fig. 6.
RFM and P2 fit parameters = P2_0 = 23.6° ± 3.8°, dΦ/dϕ' = 0.3 ± 0.1, η = 0.70 ± 0.34
Fit of Eq. (27) to historical P2 data; the positive η contradicts standard RFM models and the paper concedes this is a serious problem.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Discrete, equally spaced sparks rotate uniformly around the magnetic axis with period P4.
Adopted from the Ruderman-Sutherland carousel model at the start of Section 3; all P3 relations depend on it.
domain assumption The carousel rotation period P4 stays constant across drift modes; only spark number n changes.
Central to Eq. (5) and Table 3; no mechanism for a sudden change in n is given.
domain assumption Aberration, retardation, and retarded spark-information propagation dominate frequency-dependent subpulse phase shifts.
Assumed in Sections 3.3 and 3.4; Section 4.2.2 concedes AR may not dominate.
domain assumption Emission height scales as r' = Phi(phi) times nu^eta with no dependence on magnetic azimuth.
Introduced for Eqs. (26) and (27); the paper later questions whether eta can be positive and whether azimuth independence holds.
domain assumption A dipole field with radius-to-frequency mapping places low-frequency emission on inner field lines at greater altitude.
Used in Section 3.3.1 and Section 4.2.2 to fix the sign of the height difference.
standard math Standard algebra, Taylor expansion, and nearest-integer rounding are valid in the derivations.
Used in Eqs. (2), (22)-(25); no formal proof is provided.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The frequency-dependent behaviour of subpulse drifting: I. Carousel geometry and emission heights of PSR B0031-07." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G6LLEX4E

@misc{pith2026190803677,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The frequency-dependent behaviour of subpulse drifting: I. Carousel geometry and emission heights of PSR B0031-07},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G6LLEX4E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03677}
}

abstract

The carousel model of pulsar emission attributes the phenomenon of subpulse drifting to a set of discrete sparks located very near the stellar surface rotating around the magnetic axis. Here, we investigate the subpulse drifting behaviour of PSR B0031-07 in the context of the carousel model. We show that B0031-07's three drift modes (A, B, and C) can be understood in terms of a single carousel rotation rate if the number of sparks is allowed to change by an integral number, and where the different drift rates are due to (first-order) aliasing effects. This also results in harmonically-related values for P 3 (the time it takes a subpulse to reappear at the same pulse phase), which we confirm for B0031-07. A representative solution has [n_A, n_B, n_C] = [15, 14, 13] sparks and a carousel rotation period of P_4 = 16.4 P_1. We also investigate the frequency dependence of B0031-07's subpulse behaviour. We extend the carousel model to include the dual effects of aberration and retardation, including the time it takes the information about the surface spark configuration to travel from the surface up to the emission point. Assuming these effects dominate at B0031-07's emission heights, we derive conservative emission height differences of $\lesssim 2000$ km for mode A and $\lesssim 1000$ km for modes B and C as seen between 185 MHz and 610 MHz. This new method of measuring emission heights is independent of others that involve average profile components or the polarisation position angle curve, and thus provides a potentially strong test of the carousel model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.03677 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** The fundamental spherical triangle of pulsar viewing geometry. The LoS has been labeled ~n. The other symbols are defined in the accompanying text [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Average intensity profiles of B0031−07 made from the MWA observation (upper panel) and the GMRT observation (lower panel). The alignment of the profile centres was done by eye. cent verification of MWA polarimetry (Xue et al. 2019) has made it possible to reprocess the original recorded voltages to produce a data product with full Stokes parameters. The GMRT observations were made with the 13 central antennas in … view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** A sequence of 671 simultaneous pulses observed at the MWA (left) at 185 MHz and at the GMRT (right) at 610 MHz. All three drift modes can be seen (including the rare C mode), along with interspersed null sequences. The dynamic ranges have been adjusted by eye to give comparable contrast. Some pulses contaminated with RFI can be seen in the GMRT data set. As in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (4 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: A mode B drift sequence observed with the MWA (top figure) and the GMRT (bottom figure). The central panel shows the pulsestack with clearly identifiable drift bands and pulse energies to the right. The LRFS is in the lower panel, with the red arrows marking the frequ…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: An illustration of the method for determining the emission height difference from the subpulse phase tracks at two different frequencies. (15), θ 0 L (ϕ 0 L ) − θ 0 H(ϕ 0 H) = n P4 (r 0 L − r 0 H) = − n 2P4 (ϕ 0 L − ϕ 0 H), (16) where we have used Eq. (14) in the secon…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The relative emission height differences at MWA and GMRT frequencies for each drift mode, as a function of the assumed clock offset between the two telescopes, expressed in terms of rotation phase. A positive ∆r 0 means that the low-frequency emission (observed at the…

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: A re-creation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 27 citations worldwide. Full citation record

The Southern-sky MWA Rapid Two-metre (SMART) pulsar survey--IV. Survey update and an atlas of 205 non-recycled southern pulsars
astro-ph.HE 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

Atlas of 205 non-recycled southern pulsars at 140–170 MHz from MWA SMART data, with profiles, DMs, RMs, fluxes and public data products for SKA-Low.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

1970, Nature, 228, 42 —

Backer, D. 1970, Nature, 228, 42 —. 1971, PhD thesis, CORNELL UNIVERSITY

work page 1970
[2]

1980, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 90, 58

Bartel, N., Sieber, W., & Wolszczan, A. 1980, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 90, 58

work page 1980
[3]

2008, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 383, 1538

Bhattacharyya, B., Gupta, Y., & Gil, J. 2008, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 383, 1538

work page 2008
[4]

2007, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 377, 10

Bhattacharyya, B., Gupta, Y., Gil, J., & Sendyk, M. 2007, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 377, 10

work page 2007
[5]

2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 616, A119

Bilous, A. 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 616, A119

work page 2018
[6]

1984, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 211, 57

Davies, J., Lyne, A., Smith, F., et al. 1984, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 211, 57

work page 1984
[7]

A., & Rankin, J

Deshpande, A. A., & Rankin, J. M. 2001, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 322, 438

work page 2001
[8]

D., & Craft, H

Drake, F. D., & Craft, H. D. 1968, Nature, 220, 231

work page 1968

Show all 57 references

[9]

K., & Rudak, B

Dyks, J., Harding, A. K., & Rudak, B. 2004, Astrophysical Journal, 606, 49

2004
[10]

2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 446, 2505

Dyks, J., & Rudak, B. 2015, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 446, 2505

2015
[11]

Edwards, R. T. 2006, Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement, 6, 18

2006
[12]

T., & Stappers, B

Edwards, R. T., & Stappers, B. W. 2002, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 393, 733 —. 2003, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 410, 961

2002
[13]

G., Graham-Smith, F., et al

Esamdin, A., Lyne, A. G., Graham-Smith, F., et al. 2005, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 356, 59

2005
[14]

Gangadhara, R. T. 2004, Astrophysical Journal, 609, 335

2004
[15]

T., & Gupta, Y

Gangadhara, R. T., & Gupta, Y. 2001, The Astrophysical Journal, 555, 31

2001
[16]

2000, Astrophysical Journal, 541, 351

Gil, J., & Sendyk, M. 2000, Astrophysical Journal, 541, 351

2000
[17]

M., & Lyne, a

Gould, D. M., & Lyne, a. G. 1998, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 301, 235

1998
[18]

2004, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 426, 229

Gupta, Y., Gil, J., Kijak, J., & Sendyk, M. 2004, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 426, 229

2004
[19]

Collins, R. A. 1968, Nature, 217, 709 Hotan, a. W., Van Straten, W., & Manchester, R. N. 2004, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 21, 302

1968
[20]

R., Taylor, J

Huguenin, G. R., Taylor, J. H., & Troland, T. H. 1970, Astrophysical Journal, 162, 727

1970
[21]

A., Kuzmin, A

Izvekova, V. A., Kuzmin, A. D., Lyne, A. G., Shitov, Y. P., & Smith, F. G. 1993, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 261, 865

1993
[22]

C., Naidu, A., Gajjar, V., & Wright, G

Joshi, B. C., Naidu, A., Gajjar, V., & Wright, G. A. 2018, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 337, Pulsar Astrophysics the Next Fifty Years, ed. P. Weltevrede, B. Perera, L. Preston, & S. Sanidas, 348–349

2018
[23]

W., & Serylak, M

Karuppusamy, R., Stappers, B. W., & Serylak, M. 2011, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 525, A55

2011
[24]

M., & Rankin, J

Kloumann, I. M., & Rankin, J. M. 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 408, 40

2010
[25]

D., & Ershov, A

Kuzmin, A. D., & Ershov, A. A. 2004, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 427, 575

2004
[26]

G., & Ashworth, M

Lyne, A. G., & Ashworth, M. 1983, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 204, 519 17

1983
[27]

Maan, Y., & Deshpande, A. A. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 792, 130

2014
[28]

Melrose, D. B. 1992, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., 341, 105

1992
[29]

Mitra, D., & Rankin, J. M. 2008, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 385, 606

2008
[30]

2011, Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics, 35, 37

Nizamdin, B., Esamdin, A., Liu, Z.-Y., Wang, N., & Zhao, C.-S. 2011, Chinese Astronomy and Astrophysics, 35, 37

2011
[31]

2019, PASA, arXiv:1905.01826

Ord, S., Tremblay, S., McSweeney, S., et al. 2019, PASA, arXiv:1905.01826

2019 arXiv
[32]

J., Lee, K

Qiao, G. J., Lee, K. J., Zhang, B., Xu, R. X., & Wang, H. G. 2004, Astrophysical Journal, 616, L127

2004
[33]

Rankin, J. M. 1983, The Astrophysical Journal, 274, 333

1983
[34]

M., Ramachandran, R., & Suleymanova, S

Rankin, J. M., Ramachandran, R., & Suleymanova, S. A. 2005, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 429, 999

2005
[35]

M., Wright, G

Rankin, J. M., Wright, G. A. E., & Brown, A. M. 2013, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 433, 445

2013
[36]

A., & Sutherland, P

Ruderman, M. A., & Sutherland, P. G. 1975, The Astrophysical Journal, 196, 51

1975
[37]

Savitzky, A., & Golay, M. J. E. 1964, Analytical Chemistry, 36, 1627

1964
[38]

M., Mitra, D., & Kuijpers, J

Smits, J. M., Mitra, D., & Kuijpers, J. 2005, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 440, 10

2005
[39]

M., Mitra, D., Stappers, B

Smits, J. M., Mitra, D., Stappers, B. W., et al. 2007, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 465, 15

2007
[40]

A., & Pugachev, V

Suleimanova, S. A., & Pugachev, V. D. 2002, Astronomy Reports, 46, 309

2002
[41]

1970, Astrophysical Journal Letters, 159, doi:10.1086/180484

Sutton, J., Staelin, D., Price, R., & Weimer, R. 1970, Astrophysical Journal Letters, 159, doi:10.1086/180484

1970 doi
[42]

1991, Current Science, 60, 95

Swarup, G., Ananthakrishnan, S., Kapahi, V., et al. 1991, Current Science, 60, 95

1991
[43]

H., Manchester, R

Taylor, J. H., Manchester, R. N., & Huguenin, G. R. 1975, The Astrophysical Journal, 195, 513

1975
[44]

Thomas, R. M. C., & Gangadhara, R. T. 2007, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 467, 911

2007
[45]

Thomas, R. M. C., Gupta, Y., & Gangadhara, R. T. 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 406, 1029

2010
[46]

Thorsett, S. E. 1992, in IAU Colloq. 128: Magnetospheric Structure and Emission Mechanics of Radio Pulsars, ed. T. H. Hankins, J. M. Rankin, & J. A. Gil, 143

1992
[47]

J., Goeke, R., Bowman, J

Tingay, S. J., Goeke, R., Bowman, J. D., et al. 2013, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 30, 7

2013
[48]

E., Ord, S

Tremblay, S. E., Ord, S. M., Bhat, N. D. R., et al. 2015, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 32, e005

2015
[49]

2011, Research in Astronomical Astrophysics, 11, 974 van Leeuwen, A

Tuoheti, A., Esamdin, A., Hu, H.-d., et al. 2011, Research in Astronomical Astrophysics, 11, 974 van Leeuwen, A. G. J., Stappers, B. W., Ramachandran, R., & Rankin, J. M. 2003, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 399, 223 van Straten, W., & Bailes, M. 2011, Publications of the Astrono...

2011
[50]

Vivekanand, M., & Joshi, B. C. 1996, The Astrophysical Journal, 477, 431

1996
[51]

T., & Stappers, B

Weltevrede, P., Edwards, R. T., & Stappers, B. W. 2006, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 445, 243

2006
[52]

W., & Edwards, R

Weltevrede, P., Stappers, B. W., & Edwards, R. T. 2007, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 469, 607

2007
[53]

1981, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 100, 91

Wolszczan, A., Bartel, N., & Sieber, W. 1981, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 100, 91

1981
[54]

2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 464, 2597

Wright, G., & Weltevrede, P. 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 464, 2597

2017
[55]

Wright, G. A. E., & Fowler, L. A. 1981, in Pulsars : International Astronomical Union symposium no. 95 held in Bonn, 211

1981
[56]

2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1905.00598

Xue, M., Ord, S., Tremblay, S., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1905.00598

2019 arXiv
[57]

Han, X. H. 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 459, 603

2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

1970, Nature, 228, 42 —

Backer, D. 1970, Nature, 228, 42 —. 1971, PhD thesis, CORNELL UNIVERSITY

work page 1970

[2] [2]

1980, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 90, 58

Bartel, N., Sieber, W., & Wolszczan, A. 1980, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 90, 58

work page 1980

[3] [3]

2008, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 383, 1538

Bhattacharyya, B., Gupta, Y., & Gil, J. 2008, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 383, 1538

work page 2008

[4] [4]

2007, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 377, 10

Bhattacharyya, B., Gupta, Y., Gil, J., & Sendyk, M. 2007, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 377, 10

work page 2007

[5] [5]

2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 616, A119

Bilous, A. 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 616, A119

work page 2018

[6] [6]

1984, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 211, 57

Davies, J., Lyne, A., Smith, F., et al. 1984, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 211, 57

work page 1984

[7] [7]

A., & Rankin, J

Deshpande, A. A., & Rankin, J. M. 2001, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 322, 438

work page 2001

[8] [8]

D., & Craft, H

Drake, F. D., & Craft, H. D. 1968, Nature, 220, 231

work page 1968