Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 64 references

An Asymptotically Compatible Approach For Neumann-Type Boundary Condition On Nonlocal Problems

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that a new nonlocal Neumann-type boundary condition makes the nonlocal diffusion problem converge to the classical Neumann problem at the optimal $O(\delta^2)$ rate in $L^\infty(\Omega)$.

desk verdict Genuinely new 2D nonlocal Neumann treatment with proven O(δ²) convergence, but the headline L∞ theorem is only proved under a geometric assumption absent from the statement and violated by natural geometries. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03853 v1 pith:OO4CHYBJ submitted 2019-08-11 math.AP cs.NAmath.NA

Huaiqian You , Xin Yang Lu , Nathaniel Trask , Yue Yu This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APcs.NAmath.NA MSC 45K0576R5065R2065G99
keywords nonlocaldiffusionNeumann-typeboundaryconditionasymptoticcompatibilityintegro-differentialequationsmeshfreediscretizationconvergencerateLinfinitynormperidynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper seeks to establish that a new nonlocal version of Neumann boundary conditions for two-dimensional nonlocal diffusion converges to the classical Neumann problem at the optimal rate $O(\delta^2)$ in the $L^\infty$ norm as the nonlocal horizon $\delta$ goes to zero. Existing two-dimensional nonlocal flux treatments have only been shown to reach first order. The paper also proves that the resulting boundary value problem is well-posed on convex, sufficiently regular domains, and it provides a meshfree discretization that is asymptotically compatible. Numerical experiments on square, circular, elliptical, and corner-containing domains confirm the predicted second-order convergence.

What carries the argument

The mechanism is the nonlocal flux condition (2.2), which augments the usual nonlocal diffusion operator with two correction terms outside the domain: one involving the boundary data $g$ and one involving the second tangential derivative $[u_\delta(x)]_{pp}$, replaced in the final formulation by a one-dimensional nonlocal Laplace\,--\,Beltrami-type integral along the contour parallel to the boundary, with coefficient $M_\delta(x)$. The proof of the $O(\delta^2)$ rate rests on a maximum principle (Lemma 4.1), a truncation estimate for the consistency error $T_\delta$ (Lemma 4.2 and Lemma 4.4), and a specially constructed barrier function $\varphi(x)=|\mathrm{dist}(x,\tau(z_3))+1|^2$, where $\tau(z_3)$ is a tangent line chosen through the geometric assumption (4.14).

What would settle it

Construct a convex domain where the tangents at the two Dirichlet\,--\,Neumann interface points meet over the Dirichlet part, violating (4.14), solve the nonlocal boundary value problem (4.2) with a smooth manufactured solution, and measure $\sup_{x\in\Omega}|u_\delta(x)-u_0(x)|$ for a sequence of horizons $\delta\to0$; if the rate drops below $O(\delta^2)$ or the barrier estimate $-L_N^\delta\varphi$ changes sign in the collar, the geometric condition is necessary rather than cosmetic.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, proven as Theorem 4.5, is that the solution $u_\delta$ of the nonlocal boundary value problem (2.5) with the proposed Neumann-type constraint converges uniformly on the domain to the solution $u_0$ of the local Neumann problem (2.1), with $\sup_{x\in\Omega}|u_\delta(x)-u_0(x)|\le C\delta^2$ for sufficiently small $\delta$. This rate is optimal because the nonlocal equation itself approximates the local one only to order $O(\delta^2)$ away from the boundary. The paper further establishes well-posedness of the nonlocal variational problem through a nonlocal Poincar\'e inequality and coercivity of the nonsymmetric bilinear form, and it verifies numerically that the convergence rate survives on domains with corners, where the analysis in the smooth case does not directly apply.

Load-bearing premise

The proof of the $O(\delta^2)$ bound depends on the geometric assumption (4.14) that the tangent lines at the two Dirichlet\,--\,Neumann interface points intersect at a point whose orthogonal projection lies on the Neumann part of the boundary; if that fails, the barrier function $\varphi$ no longer yields the required lower bounds, and the corner extension must fall back on a non-coercive formulation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The nonlocal Neumann-type boundary value problem (2.5) recovers the local Neumann solution at the optimal $O(\delta^2)$ rate in the supremum norm, improving the previously known first-order rate for 2D nonlocal flux conditions.
  • The variational problem is well-posed for convex $C^3$ domains with sufficiently small horizon, giving a firm foundation for using this boundary condition in simulations.
  • The meshfree discretization is asymptotically compatible: as both the discretization length $h$ and the horizon $\delta$ go to zero with a fixed ratio, the numerical solution converges to the local solution at $O(h^2)$.
  • Because the boundary condition is imposed on a collar layer inside the domain rather than by extrapolating outside it, the formulation can be applied to sharp interfaces without mesh extensions.
  • Numerical experiments indicate that the second-order rate persists on Lipschitz domains with corners, although the corner formulation loses coercivity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The geometric assumption (4.14) is likely satisfied generically for convex domains but can fail for asymmetric Neumann arcs or reentrant corners; when it fails, the barrier-function argument would need a different barrier or an additional correction term to preserve the $O(\delta^2)$ rate.
  • The same design principle, namely adding a boundary-layer second-derivative correction inside the nonlocal operator, could be carried to 3D problems, where the contour integral would become a surface Laplace\,--\,Beltrami operator and new curvature terms would likely appear.
  • The approach suggests a general recipe for building asymptotically compatible Neumann closures for other compactly supported nonlocal models, such as peridynamic traction boundary conditions, where artificial surface effects are a known difficulty.
  • The non-coercive corner formulation may be stabilizable; if coercivity were restored, the rigorous well-posedness and convergence theory could be extended from smooth domains to polygonal and more general Lipschitz domains.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a new nonlocal Neumann-type boundary condition for two-dimensional nonlocal diffusion models with finite horizon δ, aiming for an asymptotically compatible treatment of mixed Dirichlet/Neumann problems. The authors prove well-posedness of the associated nonlocal variational problem on C3 convex domains, establish L2 convergence to the local Neumann problem as δ→0, and derive an L∞ convergence rate O(δ²) under a geometric condition on the boundary. They also develop a meshfree generalized moving least squares discretization and present numerical tests on a square, a circle, an ellipse, and a square with a corner, reporting second-order convergence in all cases. The central advertised result is Theorem 4.5, which states sup_{x∈Ω}|uδ(x)-u0(x)| ≤ Cδ² for sufficiently small δ.

Significance. If the main theorem holds as stated, the paper would provide the first two-dimensional nonlocal Neumann-type flux treatment with second-order asymptotic compatibility, a genuinely useful contribution for nonlocal diffusion and peridynamics-type applications. The paper has notable strengths: the variational framework is developed in detail; the well-posedness and L2-convergence arguments are coherent; the numerical evidence on several geometries is consistent with the claimed rate; and the extension toward corners, while heuristic, addresses a practically important regime. However, the headline L∞ result is proved only under the 'crucial geometric assumption' (4.14), which is omitted from the theorem statement, and several numerical tests fall outside the theorem's hypotheses. These scoping issues are load-bearing and must be addressed before the central claim can be accepted in its advertised generality.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, Theorem 4.5 and Eq. (4.14)] The O(δ²) L∞ convergence theorem is stated without the 'crucial geometric assumption' (4.14), and the abstract repeats the unconditional claim. In Step 3 of the proof of Lemma 4.3, the inclusion [B^-(x,δ)\Ω]^* ⊆ B^+(x,δ)\Ω is justified only by (4.14); without it, the lower bound -L_Nδ φ ≥ C(δ-s_x)^{3/2}δ^{-5/2}+C1 does not follow, so the subsequent monotonicity argument in Theorem 4.5 cannot control |Tδ|/(-L_Nδ φ). The assumption is not automatic: it fails for a square with one Neumann side, where the tangents at the two interface corners are parallel, and for a circular domain whose Neumann arc has angle at least π, where the endpoint tangents are parallel or project onto ∂Ω_D. The theorem and abstract should either incorporate (4.14) explicitly or supply a proof that removes it.
  2. [Section 4 and Sections 6.2-6.3] The theoretical result is proved only for homogeneous Neumann data g=0, as stated at the beginning of Section 4, yet the numerical tests in Sections 6.2 and 6.3 impose nonzero g and, more importantly, use a pure Neumann problem with a single pinned point uδ(0,-1)=u0(0,-1). This is not a one-dimensional Dirichlet boundary ∂Ω_D with a nonempty volume layer ∂Ω_{Dδ}, so Lemma 4.1's maximum principle and Lemma 4.3's boundary term do not apply. The observed second-order rates are therefore evidence of robustness beyond the theorem, but they do not verify Theorem 4.5 or the abstract's mixed-boundary claim as stated. Please separate the proven mixed-boundary statement from the numerically observed extensions, or extend the analysis to cover these cases.
  3. [Section 7, Eqs. (7.3)-(7.4)] The corner extension is derived by truncating a Taylor expansion, and the authors explicitly state that coercivity is lost in this formulation. Table 5 shows second-order behavior, but no well-posedness, stability, or consistency proof is supplied for Eqs. (7.3)-(7.4). Since the conclusion describes the regularity assumptions as 'relaxed in practice', the manuscript should clearly state that the corner treatment is a numerical heuristic not covered by the analysis, and should discuss the practical implications of the lost coercivity, for example by reporting condition numbers or iteration counts for the corner solver.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 5] In the h=2^{-6} row, the L∞ error 7.42×10^{-3} appears inconsistent with the preceding row 3.30×10^{-3} and with the reported order 2.15; this is likely a typo for 7.42×10^{-4} and should be corrected.
  2. [Section 4, Figure numbering] The text introducing z1,z2 and the geometric assumption refers to 'Figure 4', but the corresponding illustration is numbered Figure 3; please renumber the figures consistently.
  3. [Eq. (2.2) and nearby line integrals] The notation dx_l for the line integral along the contour Γ(x) is confusing because dx is used elsewhere for area integrals; use an arc-length differential such as dl or ds in the line integrals.
  4. [Lemma 4.1] The function space notation 'u∈C(Ω )\C(∂ΩDδ\∂ΩD)' is unclear; the intended restriction on the Dirichlet layer should be stated more precisely.
  5. [Lemma 3.4 and note after it] The note after Lemma 3.4 says ˜δ depends on both u and Ω, but the proof's bound (3.15) is independent of u; if the note is intended literally, the subsequent uniform bounds in Lemmas 3.5-3.6 do not follow. Please correct the note or clarify the uniformity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the O(δ²) Neumann-condition claim is derived from Taylor-expansion consistency bounds and a barrier estimate, not from fitted data or self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. The nonlocal flux condition (2.2)–(2.5) is constructed by Taylor-expanding the local solution u0 near ∂Ω and replacing the unknown [uδ]_pp with a 1D nonlocal Laplace–Beltrami term; no parameter is fitted to uδ or u0, and no target rate is imposed as an ansatz. The O(δ²) claim is then established by explicit estimates: Lemma 4.2 bounds the truncation Tδ, Lemma 4.3 supplies a maximum-principle barrier bound, Step 3 establishes lower bounds on −Lδφ and −LNδφ, Lemma 4.4 controls Tδ near the inner boundary, and Theorem 4.5 combines these via monotonicity of f(r). Self-citations—[58] for the meshfree quadrature framework and [57] for the asymptotic-compatibility framework—provide tools that are not load-bearing for the boundary-condition argument. The only caveat is a proof-hygiene issue, not circularity: the 'crucial geometric assumption' (4.14) is stated before Theorem 4.5 but omitted from the theorem statement; without it the barrier lower bound in Step 3 is unproved. This is a correctness gap, not a reduction of the conclusion to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted: the kernels, scalings, and the coefficient Mδ(x) are defined explicitly from the problem data. The main axioms are domain regularity, kernel moment conditions, and the geometric condition (4.14) used in the L∞ barrier proof. The boundary-condition terms are mathematical constructions, not new physical entities.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Ω is bounded, convex, connected and C3 regular.
    Stated at the start of Section 2; needed for unique orthogonal projection onto ∂Ω, curvature bounds, and the variational analysis.
  • domain assumption Kernels Jδ and Hδ satisfy rescaled integrability, positivity, nonincreasing and vanishing conditions, with ∫J|z|²=N and ∫H|z|²=1, ∫H<∞.
    Equations (1.2) and Section 2; these scaling and moment conditions are standard for nonlocal diffusion and are used throughout the Taylor-expansion consistency proofs.
  • domain assumption Boundary curvature estimates: |κ(z)|≤D, |κ'(z)|≤D and sup|κ'/κ|≤D a.e.
    Lemma 3.1; these are regularity and geometry assumptions yielding bounds on Mδ(x) and its variation.
  • ad hoc to paper Crucial geometric assumption: τ(z1)∩τ(z2) projects onto ∂ΩN.
    Equation (4.14); this condition is introduced solely to make the barrier function φ in Lemma 4.3 work for the mixed boundary case, and it restricts the validity of the L∞ theorem.
  • standard math Standard nonlocal Poincare inequality and compactness results from [45] and [50].
    Invoked in Lemma 3.4 and Lemma 3.8; the paper relies on these published results without reproving them.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An Asymptotically Compatible Approach For Neumann-Type Boundary Condition On Nonlocal Problems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OO4CHYBJ

@misc{pith2026190803853,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An Asymptotically Compatible Approach For Neumann-Type Boundary Condition On Nonlocal Problems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OO4CHYBJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03853}
}
abstract

In this paper we consider 2D nonlocal diffusion models with a finite nonlocal horizon parameter $\delta$ characterizing the range of nonlocal interactions, and consider the treatment of Neumann-like boundary conditions that have proven challenging for discretizations of nonlocal models. While existing 2D nonlocal flux boundary conditions have been shown to exhibit at most first order convergence to the local counter part as $\delta\rightarrow 0$, we present a new generalization of classical local Neumann conditions that recovers the local case as $O(\delta^2)$ in the $L^{\infty}(\Omega)$ norm. This convergence rate is optimal considering the $O(\delta^2)$ convergence of the nonlocal equation to its local limit away from the boundary. We analyze the application of this new boundary treatment to the nonlocal diffusion problem, and present conditions under which the solution of the nonlocal boundary value problem converges to the solution of the corresponding local Neumann problem as the horizon is reduced. To demonstrate the applicability of this nonlocal flux boundary condition to more complicated scenarios, we extend the approach to less regular domains, numerically verifying that we preserve second-order convergence for domains with corners. Based on the new formulation for nonlocal boundary condition, we develop an asymptotically compatible meshfree discretization, obtaining a solution to the nonlocal diffusion equation with mixed boundary conditions that converges with $O(\delta^2)$ convergence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.03853 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: Notations for the domain, where Ω is represented by the green and red regions together, and the nonlocal Neumann boundary condition is applied on the red region Ωδ. Right: Notations for the projection of point x ∈ Ωδ, the corresponding unit tangential vector p(x) and the unit normal vector n(x). In this section, we first introduce a nonlocal flux boundary condition, and then provide a corresponding nonlocal va… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Notation for the geometric estimates in Lemma 3.1. Left: illustration of regions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of the geometric assumption and notation for the barrier function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Notation for estimating the bound of R Ω∩B(x,δ) (φ(y) − φ(x))dy when x ∈ ΩN δ. Here green denotes the region of B−(x, δ) ∩ Ω, cyan denotes [B−(x, δ) ∩ Ω]∗ , and yellow denotes [Ω ∩ B+(x, δ)] \ [B−(x, δ) ∩ Ω]∗ . [∂Ω]∗ is the reflection of ∂Ω across `(x). x `(x) A B C E …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Notation for estimating the bound of R Ω∩B(x,δ) (φ(y) − φ(x))dy when x ∈ ΩN δ, where the green and cyan regions denote B−(x, δ) ∩ Ω and [B−(x, δ) ∩ Ω]∗ , respectively. The union of yellow and purple regions represent [Ω ∩ B+(x, δ)] \ [B−(x, δ) ∩ Ω]∗ . Left: notation wh…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Geometric assumptions and notation for the corner case. Here the yellow region denotes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Results on nonlocal boundary value problems

    Burak Aksoylu and Tadele Mengesha. Results on nonlocal boundary value problems. Numerical Functional Analysis and Optimization, 31(12):1301–1317, 2010

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Peridynamics and material interfaces.Journal of Elasticity, pages 1–24, 2015

    Bacim Alali and Max Gunzburger. Peridynamics and material interfaces.Journal of Elasticity, pages 1–24, 2015. 35

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Xavier Antoine and Hélène Barucq. Approximation by generalized impedance boundary conditions of a transmission problem in acoustic scattering.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 39(5):1041–1059, 2005

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    Peridynamic analysis of damage and failure in composites

    Ebrahim Askari, Jifeng Xu, and Stewart Silling. Peridynamic analysis of damage and failure in composites. In 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada. Reston, VA: AIAA, 2006

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    Astorino, F

    M. Astorino, F. Chouly, and M. A. Fernández. Robin based semi-implicit coupling in fluid-structure interaction: Stability analysis and numerics.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 31(6):4041–4065, 2009

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    Badia, F

    S. Badia, F. Nobile, and C. Vergara. Fluid-structure partitioned procedures based on Robin transmission conditions. Journal of Computational Physics, 227(14):7027–7051, 2008

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    On neumann and oblique derivatives boundary conditions for nonlocal elliptic equations.Journal of Differential Equations, 256(4):1368–1394, 2014

    Guy Barles, Christine Georgelin, and Espen R Jakobsen. On neumann and oblique derivatives boundary conditions for nonlocal elliptic equations.Journal of Differential Equations, 256(4):1368–1394, 2014

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Nonlocal integral formulations of plasticity and damage: survey of progress

    Zdenek P Ba˘ zant and Milan Jirásek. Nonlocal integral formulations of plasticity and damage: survey of progress. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 128(11):1119–1149, 2002

    work page 2002

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    A meshfree unification: reproducing kernel peridynamics

    MA Bessa, JT Foster, T Belytschko, and Wing Kam Liu. A meshfree unification: reproducing kernel peridynamics. Computational Mechanics, 53(6):1251–1264, 2014

    2014

  2. [10]

    Adaptive refinement and multiscale modeling in 2D peridynamics

    Florin Bobaru and Youn Doh Ha. Adaptive refinement and multiscale modeling in 2D peridynamics. International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering, 9(6), 2011

    2011

  3. [11]

    Another look at sobolev spaces

    Jean Bourgain, Haim Brezis, and Petru Mironescu. Another look at sobolev spaces. 2001

    2001

  4. [12]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2007

    Susanne Brenner and Ridgway Scott.The mathematical theory of finite element methods, volume 15. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007

    2007

  5. [13]

    Classical, nonlocal, and fractional diffusion equations on bounded domains

    Nathanial Burch and Richard Lehoucq. Classical, nonlocal, and fractional diffusion equations on bounded domains. International Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering, 9(6), 2011

    2011

  6. [14]

    Global entropy weak solutions for general non-local traffic flow models with anisotropic kernel.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 52(1):163–180, 2018

    Felisia Angela Chiarello and Paola Goatin. Global entropy weak solutions for general non-local traffic flow models with anisotropic kernel.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 52(1):163–180, 2018

    2018

  7. [15]

    Boundary fluxes for nonlocal diffusion.Journal of Differential Equations, 234(2):360–390, 2007

    Carmen Cortazar, Manuel Elgueta, Julio D Rossi, and Noemi Wolanski. Boundary fluxes for nonlocal diffusion.Journal of Differential Equations, 234(2):360–390, 2007

    2007

  8. [16]

    How to approximate the heat equation with neumann boundary conditions by nonlocal diffusion problems.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 187(1):137–156, 2008

    Carmen Cortazar, Manuel Elgueta, Julio D Rossi, and Noemi Wolanski. How to approximate the heat equation with neumann boundary conditions by nonlocal diffusion problems.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 187(1):137–156, 2008

    2008

  9. [17]

    A real-space non-local phase-field model of ferroelectric domain patterns in complex geometries.Acta Materialia, 55(6):1907–1917, 2007

    Kaushik Dayal and Kaushik Bhattacharya. A real-space non-local phase-field model of ferroelectric domain patterns in complex geometries.Acta Materialia, 55(6):1907–1917, 2007

    1907

  10. [18]

    Fractional diffusion on bounded domains.Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis, 18(2):342–360, 2015

    Ozlem Defterli, Marta D’Elia, Qiang Du, Max Gunzburger, Rich Lehoucq, and Mark M Meerschaert. Fractional diffusion on bounded domains.Fractional Calculus and Applied Analysis, 18(2):342–360, 2015

    2015

  11. [19]

    An approach to modeling extreme loading of structures using peridynamics

    Paul Demmie and Stewart Silling. An approach to modeling extreme loading of structures using peridynamics. Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures, 2(10):1921–1945, 2007

    1921

  12. [20]

    Nonlocal problems with neumann boundary conditions

    Serena Dipierro, Xavier Ros-Oton, and Enrico Valdinoci. Nonlocal problems with neumann boundary conditions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.3313, 2014. 36

    2014 arXiv

  13. [21]

    A nonlocal vector calculus, nonlocal volume-constrained problems, and nonlocal balance laws.Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 23(03):493–540, 2013

    Qiang Du, Max Gunzburger, Richard B Lehoucq, and Kun Zhou. A nonlocal vector calculus, nonlocal volume-constrained problems, and nonlocal balance laws.Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 23(03):493–540, 2013

    2013

  14. [22]

    Nonlocal convection-diffusion volume-constrained problems and jump processes.Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems-Series B, 19(4), 2014

    Qiang Du, Zhan Huang, and Richard B Lehoucq. Nonlocal convection-diffusion volume-constrained problems and jump processes.Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems-Series B, 19(4), 2014

    2014

  15. [23]

    Integral approximations to classical diffusionandsmoothedparticlehydrodynamics

    Qiang Du, Richard B Lehoucq, and Alexandre M Tartakovsky. Integral approximations to classical diffusionandsmoothedparticlehydrodynamics. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 286:216–229, 2015

    2015

  16. [24]

    Peridynamics, fracture, and nonlocal continuum models.SIAM News, 47(3), 2014

    Qiang Du and Robert Lipton. Peridynamics, fracture, and nonlocal continuum models.SIAM News, 47(3), 2014

    2014

  17. [25]

    Qiang Du, Robert Lipton, and Tadele Mengesha. Multiscale analysis of linear evolution equations with applications to nonlocal models for heterogeneous media.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 50(5):1425–1455, 2016

    2016

  18. [26]

    A peridynamic model of fracture mechanics with bond- breaking

    Qiang Du, Yunzhe Tao, and Xiaochuan Tian. A peridynamic model of fracture mechanics with bond- breaking. Journal of Elasticity, pages 1–22, 2017

    2017

  19. [27]

    Mathematical analysis for the peridynamic nonlocal continuum theory.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 45(02):217–234, 2011

    Qiang Du and Kun Zhou. Mathematical analysis for the peridynamic nonlocal continuum theory.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 45(02):217–234, 2011

    2011

  20. [28]

    Survey of existence results in nonlinear peridynamics in comparison with local elastodynamics.Computational Methods in Applied Mathematics, 15(4):483–496, 2015

    Etienne Emmrich and Dimitri Puhst. Survey of existence results in nonlinear peridynamics in comparison with local elastodynamics.Computational Methods in Applied Mathematics, 15(4):483–496, 2015

    2015

  21. [29]

    Analysis and numerical approximation of an integro-differential equation modeling non-local effects in linear elasticity.Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids, 12(4):363– 384, 2007

    Etienne Emmrich and Olaf Weckner. Analysis and numerical approximation of an integro-differential equation modeling non-local effects in linear elasticity.Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids, 12(4):363– 384, 2007

    2007

  22. [30]

    Etienne Emmrich, Olaf Weckner, et al. On the well-posedness of the linear peridynamic model and its convergence towards the navier equation of linear elasticity.Communications in Mathematical Sciences, 5(4):851–864, 2007

    2007

  23. [31]

    Convergence of a semi-discrete numerical method for a class of nonlocal nonlinear wave equations.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 52(3):803–826, 2018

    Hüsnü A Erbay, Saadet Erbay, and Albert Erkip. Convergence of a semi-discrete numerical method for a class of nonlocal nonlinear wave equations.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 52(3):803–826, 2018

    2018

  24. [32]

    PhD thesis, Purdue University, 2009

    John T Foster.Dynamic crack initiation toughness: Experiments and peridynamic modeling. PhD thesis, Purdue University, 2009

    2009

  25. [33]

    Peridynamic modeling of concrete structures.Nuclear Engineering and Design, 237(12):1250–1258, 2007

    Walter Gerstle, Nicolas Sau, and Stewart Silling. Peridynamic modeling of concrete structures.Nuclear Engineering and Design, 237(12):1250–1258, 2007

    2007

  26. [34]

    Local and nonlocal boundary conditions forµ-transmission and fractional elliptic pseudodifferential operators.Analysis & PDE, 7(7):1649–1682, 2014

    Gerd Grubb et al. Local and nonlocal boundary conditions forµ-transmission and fractional elliptic pseudodifferential operators.Analysis & PDE, 7(7):1649–1682, 2014

    2014

  27. [35]

    Characteristics of dynamic brittle fracture captured with peridynamics

    Youn Doh Ha and Florin Bobaru. Characteristics of dynamic brittle fracture captured with peridynamics. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 78(6):1156–1168, 2011

    2011

  28. [36]

    Dynamic brittle fracture as a small horizon limit of peridynamics.Journal of Elasticity, 117(1):21–50, 2014

    Robert Lipton. Dynamic brittle fracture as a small horizon limit of peridynamics.Journal of Elasticity, 117(1):21–50, 2014

    2014

  29. [37]

    What is the fractional laplacian?arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.09767, 2018

    Anna Lischke, Guofei Pang, Mamikon Gulian, Fangying Song, Christian Glusa, Xiaoning Zheng, Zhiping Mao, Wei Cai, Mark M Meerschaert, Mark Ainsworth, et al. What is the fractional laplacian?arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.09767, 2018. 37

    2018 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Strong local-nonlocal coupling for integrated fracture modeling

    David J Littlewood, Stewart A Silling, John A Mitchell, Pablo D Seleson, Stephen D Bond, Michael L Parks, Daniel Z Turner, Damon J Burnett, Jakob Ostien, and Max Gunzburger. Strong local-nonlocal coupling for integrated fracture modeling. Technical report, Sandia National Labo...

    2015

  31. [39]

    Weak form of peridynamics for nonlocal essential and natural boundary conditions

    Erdogan Madenci, Mehmet Dorduncu, Atila Barut, and Nam Phan. Weak form of peridynamics for nonlocal essential and natural boundary conditions. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 337:598–631, 2018

    2018

  32. [40]

    Springer, 2016

    Erdogan Madenci and Erkan Oterkus.Peridynamic theory and its applications. Springer, 2016

    2016

  33. [41]

    Begell House Publishers Inc., Redding, CT, 2006

    Richard L Magin.Fractional calculus in bioengineering. Begell House Publishers Inc., Redding, CT, 2006

    2006

  34. [42]

    World Scientific, 2010

    Francesco Mainardi.Fractional calculus and waves in linear viscoelasticity: an introduction to mathe- matical models. World Scientific, 2010

    2010

  35. [43]

    Hamilton-jacobi equations and distance functions on riemannian manifolds

    Carlo Mantegazza and Andrea Carlo Mennucci. Hamilton-jacobi equations and distance functions on riemannian manifolds. Applied Mathematics & Optimization, 47(1), 2003

    2003

  36. [44]

    Analysis of a scalar peridynamic model with a sign changing kernel

    Tadele Mengesha and Qiang Du. Analysis of a scalar peridynamic model with a sign changing kernel. Disc. Cont. Dyn. Sys. B, 18:1415–1437, 2013

    2013

  37. [45]

    Nonlocal constrained value problems for a linear peridynamic navier equation

    Tadele Mengesha and Qiang Du. Nonlocal constrained value problems for a linear peridynamic navier equation. Journal of Elasticity, 116(1):27–51, 2014

    2014

  38. [46]

    Characterization of function spaces of vector fields and an application in nonlinear peridynamics.Nonlinear Analysis, 140:82–111, 2016

    Tadele Mengesha and Qiang Du. Characterization of function spaces of vector fields and an application in nonlinear peridynamics.Nonlinear Analysis, 140:82–111, 2016

    2016

  39. [47]

    Fractional diffusion with neumann boundary conditions: the logistic equation.arXiv preprint arXiv:1208.0470, 2012

    Eugenio Montefusco, Benedetta Pellacci, and Gianmaria Verzini. Fractional diffusion with neumann boundary conditions: the logistic equation.arXiv preprint arXiv:1208.0470, 2012

    2012 arXiv

  40. [48]

    M. L. Parks, P. Seleson, S. J. Plimpton, R. B. Lehoucq, and S. A. Silling. Peridynamics with lammps: A user guide v0.2 beta.Sandia National Laboraties, 2008

    2008

  41. [49]

    Igor Podlubny. Fractional differential equations: an introduction to fractional derivatives, fractional differential equations, to methods of their solution and some of their applications, volume 198. Academic Press, 1998

    1998

  42. [50]

    An estimate in the spirit of poincaré’s inequality.Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 6(1):1–15, 2004

    Augusto C Ponce. An estimate in the spirit of poincaré’s inequality.Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 6(1):1–15, 2004

    2004

  43. [51]

    Compact difference scheme for the fractional sub-diffusion equation with neumann boundary conditions.Journal of Computational Physics, 232(1):456–467, 2013

    Jincheng Ren, Zhi-Zhong Sun, and Xuan Zhao. Compact difference scheme for the fractional sub-diffusion equation with neumann boundary conditions.Journal of Computational Physics, 232(1):456–467, 2013

    2013

  44. [52]

    A priori error estimates for reduced order models in finance

    Ekkehard W Sachs and Matthias Schu. A priori error estimates for reduced order models in finance. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 47(2):449–469, 2013

    2013

  45. [53]

    Interface problems in nonlocal diffusion and sharp transitions between local and nonlocal domains.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 266:185–204, 2013

    Pablo Seleson, Max Gunzburger, and Michael L Parks. Interface problems in nonlocal diffusion and sharp transitions between local and nonlocal domains.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 266:185–204, 2013

    2013

  46. [54]

    Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 48(1):175–209, 2000

    Stewart A Silling. Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 48(1):175–209, 2000

    2000

  47. [55]

    Nonlocal diffusion and peridynamic models with neumann type constraints and their numerical approximations.Applied Mathematics and Computation, 305:282–298, 2017

    Yunzhe Tao, Xiaochuan Tian, and Qiang Du. Nonlocal diffusion and peridynamic models with neumann type constraints and their numerical approximations.Applied Mathematics and Computation, 305:282–298, 2017. 38

    2017

  48. [56]

    A two-dimensional peridynamic model for thin plates.Mathe- matics and Mechanics of Solids, 20(8):998–1010, 2015

    Michael Taylor and David J Steigmann. A two-dimensional peridynamic model for thin plates.Mathe- matics and Mechanics of Solids, 20(8):998–1010, 2015

    2015

  49. [57]

    Asymptotically compatible schemes and applications to robust dis- cretization of nonlocal models.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 52(4):1641–1665, 2014

    Xiaochuan Tian and Qiang Du. Asymptotically compatible schemes and applications to robust dis- cretization of nonlocal models.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 52(4):1641–1665, 2014

    2014

  50. [58]

    Trask, H

    N. Trask, H. You, Y. Yu, and M. L. Parks. A meshfree quadrature rule for non-local mechanics.To appear, 2018

    2018

  51. [59]

    Damage and failure analysis based on peridynamics—theory and applications

    Olaf Weckner, Abe Askari, Jifeng Xu, Hamid Razi, and SA Silling. Damage and failure analysis based on peridynamics—theory and applications. In48th AIAA Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conf, 2007

    2007

  52. [60]

    Cambridge university press, 2004

    Holger Wendland.Scattered data approximation, volume 17. Cambridge university press, 2004

    2004

  53. [61]

    Peridynamic analysis of impact damage in composite laminates

    Jifeng Xu, Abe Askari, Olaf Weckner, and Stewart Silling. Peridynamic analysis of impact damage in composite laminates. Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 21(3):187–194, 2008

    2008

  54. [62]

    Y. Yu, F. Bargos, H. You, M. L. Parks, M. L. Bittencourt, and G. E. Karniadakis. A partitioned coupling framework for peridynamics and classical theory: Analysis and simulations.To appear on Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2018

    2018

  55. [63]

    Mathematical and numerical analysis of linear peridynamic models with nonlocal boundary conditions.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 48(5):1759–1780, 2010

    Kun Zhou and Qiang Du. Mathematical and numerical analysis of linear peridynamic models with nonlocal boundary conditions.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 48(5):1759–1780, 2010

    2010

  56. [64]

    A continuum theory with long-range forces for solids

    Markus Zimmermann. A continuum theory with long-range forces for solids. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2005. 39

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.