Curvature of the base manifold of a Monge-Amp\`ere fibration and its existence

Xueyuan Wan; Xu Wang

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 53 references

Curvature of the base manifold of a Monge-Amp\`ere fibration and its existence

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For a Poisson–Kähler fibration, the base carries a Kähler metric whose holomorphic sectional curvature is bounded above by a negative constant and whose holomorphic bisectional curvature is non-positive.

desk verdict Theorem A's curvature result looks real and Theorem B is a nice characterization, but Theorem C's converse is false as stated and the paper leans on unpublished foundational input. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03955 v3 pith:5354L2VG submitted 2019-08-11 math.AG math.CVmath.DGmath.SG

Xueyuan Wan , Xu Wang This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AGmath.CVmath.DGmath.SG MSC 32G2053C5553D20

keywords Monge-AmpèrefibrationPoisson-Kählernon-harmonicWeil-PeterssonmetricnegativecurvatureHiggsbundleKodaira-SpencermaphorizontalliftrelativeKähler

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper answers a form of the negative curvature problem in Kähler geometry for a special class of fibrations. The class, called Poisson–Kähler fibrations, consists of relative Kähler fibrations whose total-space form satisfies the homogeneous Monge–Ampère equation, $\omega^{n+1}\equiv 0$. The paper proves that the base of such a fibration, whenever the Kodaira–Spencer map is injective, carries a canonical Kähler metric—the non-harmonic Weil–Petersson metric—whose holomorphic sectional curvature is bounded above by $-2/n\,|X_t|^{-1}$ and whose holomorphic bisectional curvature is non-positive. It also characterizes Poisson–Kähler fibrations through projectively flat vector bundles and through flatness of an associated infinite-rank Higgs bundle.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by an infinite-rank quasi-vector bundle $A^{p,q}$ whose fiber over $t\in B$ is the space of smooth $(p,q)$-forms on the fiber $X_t$, equipped with a Lie-derivative connection $\nabla$ built from the horizontal lifts of vector fields on the base. The decisive structural input, quoted from earlier work rather than proved here, is that the induced connection $D$ is the Chern connection with respect to the fiberwise $L^2$ metric and that the Kodaira–Spencer operators satisfy $\kappa_j=\kappa_j^*$. These identities turn the Chern-curvature identities for $D$ into pointwise estimates such as $|\kappa_j\kappa_j|^2\ge |\kappa_j|^4/(n|X_t|)$, which give the negative upper bounds on the holomorphic sectional curvature and the non-positivity of the bisectional curvature. A companion formula expresses the non-harmonic Weil–Petersson metric through the relative canonical bundle and the fiberwise scalar curvature.

What would settle it

Compute the non-harmonic Weil–Petersson curvature directly for a non-isotrivial Poisson–Kähler family of elliptic curves and compare it with the predicted upper bound $-2/n\,|X_t|^{-1}$; any local direction with positive holomorphic bisectional curvature, or with sectional curvature above that bound, would disprove the theorem. A second check is to test the identity $\kappa_j=\kappa_j^*$ on the infinite-rank bundle $A^{p,q}$ for such a family, since that identity is the proof's load-bearing input.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 4.1: for every Poisson–Kähler fibration $p\colon (X,\omega)\to B$ with injective Kodaira–Spencer map, the non-harmonic Weil–Petersson metric $\omega_{DF}$ is Kähler, its holomorphic sectional curvature is at most $-2/n\,|X_t|^{-1}$, and its holomorphic bisectional curvature is non-positive; here $n$ is the fiber dimension and $|X_t|$ the fiber volume. The same infinite-rank Higgs-bundle machinery yields two structural results. A holomorphic vector bundle over a compact Kähler manifold admits a projectively flat Hermitian metric exactly when its projectivized bundle is Poisson–Kähler, and over a compact curve this condition is equivalent to polystability. And a relative Kähler fibration is Poisson–Kähler exactly when the associated infinite-rank Higgs bundle, whose fibers are smooth differential forms on the fibers of the fibration, is Higgs-flat.

Load-bearing premise

The whole curvature estimate rests on an imported theorem, not proved in this paper, that the Lie-derivative connection on each infinite-rank form bundle is the Chern connection and that the Kodaira–Spencer operators satisfy $\kappa_j=\kappa_j^*$; if that fails, the negativity argument collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every Poisson–Kähler fibration with injective Kodaira–Spencer map has a base metric satisfying the negative curvature property, so the negative curvature problem is settled affirmatively on this entire class.
The non-harmonic Weil–Petersson metric is a genuinely Kähler metric, not merely a positive definite form, making it a usable canonical metric on bases of such fibrations.
A holomorphic vector bundle over a compact Kähler base is projectively flat (Hermitian) if and only if its projective bundle fibration is Poisson–Kähler; over a curve this is the same as polystability.
Poisson–Kähler fibrations are exactly those whose associated infinite-rank Higgs bundle is Higgs-flat, giving a flatness criterion for the homogeneous Monge–Ampère equation on fibrations.
In the one-dimensional fiber case with positive relative canonical bundle, the general curvature formula reproduces the classical negative curvature bound for the moduli space of curves.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the imported metric-connection and self-adjointness identities hold in wider generality, Theorem 4.15's explicit curvature formula suggests a route to negative curvature for arbitrary relative Kähler fibrations in which the geodesic-curvature terms $c_{j\bar k}$ are controlled by a degenerate Monge–Ampère-type equation.
The Higgs-flat characterization recasts the homogeneous Monge–Ampère equation as a flatness condition on an infinite-rank Higgs bundle, suggesting that existence of Poisson–Kähler structures may be governed by a Hermitian–Einstein-type stability condition.
The explicit examples—families of elliptic curves, Kähler metric geodesics, convex function geodesics, and Hermitian form geodesics—give concrete test cases where the $-2/n\,|X_t|^{-1}$ bound could be checked numerically or analytically.
For higher-dimensional bases, the projective-bundle characterization suggests testing whether Poisson–Kähler is equivalent to a slope-stability condition for vector bundles, extending the curve case.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

First, the stress-test note is right, and it is not a technical nitpick. In Section 7.3 the authors derive [V_j,\bar V_k]=0 from Higgs-flatness and then invoke Proposition 2.2 to conclude Poisson–Kähler. But Proposition 2.2(4) only says [V_j,\bar V_k]=0 iff d\omega'=0, where \omega'=\omega-c(\omega). That is integrability of the horizontal distribution; it makes \omega' a Poisson–Kähler form, not \omega. The actual condition is c_{j\bar k}\equiv 0. The product counterexample is clean: take X=B\times F with \omega_X=p^*\alpha+\omega_F and \omega_B=2\alpha. The relative form \omega_F-p^*\alpha fails the Monge–Ampère equation, but the horizontal lifts have no mixed terms, so all Kodaira–Spencer operators vanish and the associated bundle A is Higgs-flat. The advertised equivalence in the abstract is therefore false.

That said, the paper is not a throwaway. Theorem 4.15's general second variation formula for the non-harmonic Weil–Petersson metric is a real, non-circular computation, and the negativity estimates for Poisson–Kähler fibrations are supported by multiple independent routes, including a direct Schumacher-style calculation. Theorem B—projective flatness of E iff P(E)->B admits a Poisson–Kähler structure—is a substantive new characterization, and the proof via direct image curvature is a serious argument. These are the parts worth keeping.

The biggest problem beyond Theorem C is that Theorem 7.1 (the Lie-derivative connection is Chern and \kappa_j=\kappa_j^*) is imported from an unpublished preprint and an early version of [10]. That adjoint property is the technical heart of the curvature negativity, and a referee cannot verify it from this paper without access to the source. Several other references are also "preprint" or "TBA," which makes a full check harder.

My overall read: Theorem A and Theorem B have a good chance of surviving, but Theorem C cannot stand as written. The paper deserves a serious referee rather than a desk reject, but only after the abstract and Theorem C are corrected or removed and the unpublished inputs are made available. This is a conditional major revision, not a reject outright.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies relative Kähler fibrations and two Weil–Petersson type metrics on the base. Its main curvature theorem (Theorem A / Theorem 4.1) states that for a Poisson–Kähler fibration with injective Kodaira–Spencer map, the non-harmonic Weil–Petersson metric is Kähler, has holomorphic sectional curvature bounded above by -2/(n|X_t|), and has non-positive holomorphic bisectional curvature. The paper also proves a characterization of projectively flat vector bundles in terms of Poisson–Kähler projective bundle fibrations (Theorem B / Theorem 6.1) and claims an equivalence between a relative Kähler fibration being Monge–Ampère and an associated infinite-rank Higgs bundle being Higgs-flat (Theorem C). The arguments include a finite-dimensional Higgs-bundle treatment of Burns' theorem, three proof strategies for Theorem A, several examples, and an appendix containing the proof of Theorem C.

Significance. If Theorem A can be established rigorously, it gives a positive answer to the negative-curvature problem for every Poisson–Kähler fibration, with an explicit and uniform negative upper bound for holomorphic sectional curvature. The third proof of Theorem A in §7.4 is a concrete Schumacher-type computation that, if correct, would be an independent route to this result. Theorem B is a clean and attractive characterization of projectively flat Hermitian vector bundles through Poisson–Kähler projectivizations. However, the paper's advertised equivalence Theorem C is false as stated, and the Higgs-bundle proof of Theorem A in §4.1 contains an identity that is inconsistent with the contraction action of the Kodaira–Spencer operators. These issues affect the abstract's central existence claim and the presentation of the main proof, so the manuscript cannot be accepted in its current form.

major comments (3)

[§7.3 and abstract (Theorem C)] The 'only if' direction of Theorem C is false as stated. The proof derives [V_j,\bar V_k]≡0 from Higgs-flatness and then invokes Proposition 2.2 to conclude that ω is Poisson–Kähler. Proposition 2.2(4), however, only equates [V_j,\bar V_k]≡0 with dω'=0, where ω'=ω-c(ω); it does not imply ω^{n+1}=0 unless the geodesic curvature form c(ω) vanishes. A concrete counterexample is X=B×F with B and F compact Kähler, ω_X=p^*α+ω_F, and ω_B=2α. Then ω=ω_X-p^*ω_B=ω_F-p^*α is a relative Kähler form with c(ω)=-α≠0, so p is not Poisson–Kähler since ω^{n+1}=(n+1)(-p^*α)∧ω_F^n≠0. But the horizontal lifts commute, giving κ_j=0, θ=0, and a flat Lie-derivative connection on the product bundle, so A is Higgs-flat in the paper's own sense. The equivalence stated in the abstract and in Theorem C must be corrected, for example by adding the condition c_{j\bar k}≡0 or by replacing 'Poisson–Kähler' with integrability of the horizontal distribution.
[§4.1, Eqs. (4.3)-(4.5)] The Higgs-bundle proof of Theorem A uses the identity -[Θ_{j\bar k},κ_l]=κ_jκ_kκ_l+κ_lκ_kκ_j after observing that κ_jκ_l=0 on A^1. With the contraction action of κ_j defined in §7.2.1, both κ_jκ_k and κ_lκ_kκ_j vanish on A^1, so the displayed identity is inconsistent with the definition of the Kodaira–Spencer operators as contraction operators. Consequently the lower bound (4.5) does not follow from (4.3)–(4.4). The third proof in §7.4 treats κ_j as a TX_t-valued endomorphism and uses a different multiplication; the two frameworks must be reconciled before the §4.1 proof can be regarded as valid.
[§7.1.2, Theorem 7.1] The proof of Theorem A, in both the §4.1 Higgs-bundle computation and the computations in §7.4 that invoke Theorem 7.2, depends critically on Theorem 7.1, which asserts that the Lie-derivative connection D is the Chern connection on each A^{p,q} and that κ_j=κ_j^*. This theorem is not proved in the present paper; it is cited to [49] and to an early version of [10]. Because the negativity of the curvature of ω_DF in the Higgs-bundle argument rests on the adjoint identity κ_j=κ_j^*, the manuscript should either provide a proof of Theorem 7.1 or point to a stable, citable version of the result.

minor comments (4)

[Definition 1.1 and Definition 2.6] The paper uses two closely related but not identical definitions of Poisson–Kähler: (ω_X-p^*ω_B)^{n+1}=0 for fibrations between Kähler manifolds, and ω^{n+1}=0 for a relative Kähler form. This is understandable, but the two should be explicitly reconciled in a remark, since the distinction is relevant to the error in Theorem C.
[§2.2, Remark 1 after Definition 2.6] The sentence 'ω' is Poisson–Kähler if and only if the horizontal distribution associated to ω is integrable' is confusing, since ω' is always vertical in the sense that (ω')^{n+1}=0 by Proposition 2.2(2). The remark should be rephrased to avoid suggesting that integrability of the horizontal distribution is equivalent to the Monge–Ampère equation.
[§4.1, Eq. (4.5)] The inequality ∂²⟨κ_j,κ_j⟩ ≥ 2||κ_jκ_j||² appears to require the first term in (4.4) to be nonnegative; this is precisely the point at issue in the second major comment. Even if the sign is ultimately correct, the derivation needs to be rewritten so that the domain of the operators and the definition of the product are unambiguous.
[Abstract and typography] The abstract contains a typo ('homogenous'), and the spelling 'Monge-Ampère' is inconsistent with the body's 'Monge–Ampère'. These should be corrected in revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular reduction in the main curvature theorem; the load-bearing self-citations are prior independent results, and the main non-circular concern is the correctness gap in Theorem C.

full rationale

The central curvature theorem (Theorem 4.1) is not obtained by fitting a parameter or by assuming the desired negativity. The Poisson-Kähler input c_{j\bar k}=0 is used, via Proposition 2.2, to obtain [V_j,\bar V_k]=0 and hence flatness of the Lie-derivative connection, exactly as stated in section 4.1: "if ω^{n+1}=0 then [V_j,\bar V_k]≡0 (see Proposition 2.2), thus ... (∇)^2≡0." The negativity bound then follows from the algebraic identities Θ_{j\bar k}=-[κ_j,κ_k], the adjoint relation κ_j^*=κ_l, and the pointwise/Hölder estimate |κ_jκ_j|^2 ≥ |κ_j|^4/(n|X_t|). None of these steps presupposes the curvature bound being proved. The Chern-connection and adjoint facts are imported from [49] and an early version of [10] through Theorem 7.1; these are self-citations, but they are prior parameter-free results whose assumptions do not include the target curvature estimate, so they are independent evidence rather than a circular chain. There is a genuine mathematical concern in Theorem C, section 7.3: the converse direction derives [V_j,\bar V_k]=0 from Higgs-flatness and then invokes Proposition 2.2 to conclude Poisson-Kähler, whereas Proposition 2.2(4) only gives dω'=0, not c_{j\bar k}=0. This appears to be a correctness gap in an equivalence statement, not a circular reduction, and Theorem C is not used to prove Theorem A. Overall, the derivation of the main curvature theorem is not circular; the low score reflects only minor self-citation dependence and a separate correctness caveat.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted constants or new physical entities appear. The Poisson-Kähler fibration and infinite-rank Higgs bundle are mathematical definitions built from the given fibration, not independent postulates. The main imported assumptions are the cited analytic theorems and the infinite-rank analytic framework.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Theorem 7.1: D defines a Chern connection on each (A^{p,q}, Γ^{p,q}) and κ_j = κ_j^*, imported from [49] and an early version of [10].
Load-bearing for the curvature computations in Section 4.1; it is quoted rather than proved in this paper.
domain assumption Theorem 6.4, the Berndtsson curvature formula for direct image bundles [7, Theorem 1.2], is used in the proof of Theorem B.
Central to deriving projectively flatness from the Poisson-Kähler condition on the projectivized bundle.
standard math Standard Kähler geometry tools: existence of horizontal lifts, the ∂∂-lemma, Leray-Hirsch, and Schumacher's formulas are invoked without proof.
These are standard background results in complex and Kähler geometry.
domain assumption The infinite-rank Lie-derivative connection on the quasi-vector bundle A is assumed to behave like a finite-rank Higgs bundle, with the analytic regularization left implicit.
The quasi-vector bundle formalism comes from an early version of [10]; regularity and convergence of the Lie-derivative operators are not established in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Curvature of the base manifold of a Monge-Amp\`ere fibration and its existence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5354L2VG

@misc{pith2026190803955,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Curvature of the base manifold of a Monge-Amp\`ere fibration and its existence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5354L2VG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03955}
}

read the original abstract

In this paper, we consider a special relative K\"ahler fibration that satisfies a homogenous Monge-Amp\`ere equation, which is called a Monge-Amp\`ere fibration. There exist two canonical types of generalized Weil-Petersson metrics on the base complex manifold of the fibration. For the second generalized Weil-Petersson metric, we obtain an explicit curvature formula and prove that the holomorphic bisectional curvature is non-positive, the holomorphic sectional curvature, the Ricci curvature, and the scalar curvature are all bounded from above by a negative constant. For a holomorphic vector bundle over a compact K\"ahler manifold, we prove that it admits a projectively flat Hermitian structure if and only if the associated projective bundle fibration is a Monge-Amp\`ere fibration. In general, we can prove that a relative K\"ahler fibration is Monge-Amp\`ere if and only if an associated infinite rank Higgs bundle is Higgs-flat. We also discuss some typical examples of Monge-Amp\`ere fibrations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

[10]

Berndtsson, M

B. Berndtsson, M. P ˘aun and X. Wang, Algebraic ﬁber spaces and curvature of higher direct images , arXiv:1704.02279

arXiv
[49]

Notes on variation of Lefschetz star operator and $T$-Hodge theory

X. Wang, Notes on variation of Lefschetz star operator and T –Hodge theory , arXiv:1708.07332

work page Pith review arXiv
[1]

L. V . Ahlfors, Some remarks on T eichmuller’s space of Riemann surfaces, Ann. Math. (1961), 171–191

work page 1961
[2]

L. V . Ahlfors, Curvature properties of T eichmuller’s space, Journal d’Analyse Mathématique 9 (1961), 161– 176

work page 1961
[3]

Aikou, Projective ﬂatness of complex Finsler metrics , Publ

T. Aikou, Projective ﬂatness of complex Finsler metrics , Publ. Math. Debrecen 63 (2003), no. 3, 343–362

work page 2003
[4]

Arezzo and G

C. Arezzo and G. Tian, Inﬁnite geodesic rays in the space of Kähler potentials , Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 2 (2003), no. 4, 617–630

work page 2003
[5]

Berndtsson, Convexity on the space of Kähler metrics , Ann

B. Berndtsson, Convexity on the space of Kähler metrics , Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. 22 (2013), 713–746

work page 2013
[6]

Berndtsson, Curvature of vector bundles associated to holomorphic ﬁbra tions, Ann

B. Berndtsson, Curvature of vector bundles associated to holomorphic ﬁbra tions, Ann. Math. 169, (2009), 531–560

work page 2009

Show all 53 references

[7]

Berndtsson, Strict and non strict positivity of direct image bundles , Math

B. Berndtsson, Strict and non strict positivity of direct image bundles , Math. Z. 269 (3-4), (2011), 1201–1218

2011
[8]

Berndtsson, Negative curvature and complex structures, preprint

B. Berndtsson, Negative curvature and complex structures, preprint
[9]

Berndtsson, Private discussions

B. Berndtsson, Private discussions
[11]

Berndtsson, D

B. Berndtsson, D. Cordero–Erausquin, B. Klartag, Y .A. Rubinstein, Complex Legendre duality , arXiv:1608.05541, Amer. J. Math., to appear

arXiv
[12]

R. Bott, L. W . Tu, Differential Forms in Algebraic Topol ogy (Springer, 1982)

1982
[13]

Burns, Curvatures of Monge–Ampere F oliations and Parabolic Manif olds, Ann

D. Burns, Curvatures of Monge–Ampere F oliations and Parabolic Manif olds, Ann. Math. 115 (1982), 349– 373

1982
[14]

X. X. Chen, The space of Kähler metrics . J. Differ. Geom. 56 (2000), 189–234

2000
[15]

X. X. Chen and G. Tian, Geometry of Kähler metrics and foliations by holomorphic di scs, Pubi. Math. I.H.E.S. 107 (2008), 1–107

2008
[16]

Claudon, S

B. Claudon, S. Kebekus and B. Taji, Generic positivity and applications to hyperbolicity of mo duli spaces , arXiv preprint
[17]

Deng, Kobayashi hyperbolicity of moduli spaces of minimal projec tive manifolds of general type (with the appendix by Dan Abramovich) , arXiv:1806.01666

Y . Deng, Kobayashi hyperbolicity of moduli spaces of minimal projec tive manifolds of general type (with the appendix by Dan Abramovich) , arXiv:1806.01666

arXiv
[18]

S. K. Donaldson, Remarks on gauge theory, complex geometry and four–manifol d topology, Fields Medallists’ Lectures (Atiyah and Iagolnitzer, eds.), World Scientiﬁc, 1997, pp. 384–403

1997
[19]

S. K. Donaldson, Scalar curvature and stability of toric varieties , J. Differential Geom. 62 (2002), 289–349

2002
[20]

H. Feng, K. Liu and X. Wan, Chern forms of holomorphic Finsler vector bundles and some a pplications, International Journal of Mathematics, V ol. 27, No. 4, 2016. 52 XUEYUAN W AN AND XU W ANG

2016
[21]

H. Feng, K. Liu and X. Wan, Geodesic–Einstein metrics and nonlinear stabilities , Tran. Amer. Math. Soc. 371 (2019), no. 11, 8029-8049

2019
[22]

Fujiki, Moduli space of polarized algebraic manifolds and Kähler me trics, Sugaku Expositions, 5 (1992), 173–191

A. Fujiki, Moduli space of polarized algebraic manifolds and Kähler me trics, Sugaku Expositions, 5 (1992), 173–191

1992
[23]

Fujiki and G, Schumacher, The moduli space of extremal compact Kähler manifolds and ge neralized W eil– Petersson metrics

A. Fujiki and G, Schumacher, The moduli space of extremal compact Kähler manifolds and ge neralized W eil– Petersson metrics. Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical S ciences, 26 (1990), 101–183

1990
[24]

Fulton, Intersection Theory, Second Edition, Sprin ger, 1998

W . Fulton, Intersection Theory, Second Edition, Sprin ger, 1998

1998
[25]

Grifﬁths (Ed.), T opics in Transcendental Algebraic Geometry, Princeton University Press, 1984

P . Grifﬁths (Ed.), T opics in Transcendental Algebraic Geometry, Princeton University Press, 1984

1984
[26]

Grifﬁths and W

P . Grifﬁths and W . Schmid, Locally homogeneous complex manifolds , Acta Math. 123 (1969), 253–302

1969
[27]

Huybrechts, Complex geometry

D. Huybrechts, Complex geometry. An introduction. Uni versitext. Springer-V erlag, Berlin, 2005. xii+309 pp

2005
[28]

G. R. Kempf, Complex abelian varieties and theta functions , Springer
[29]

Kobayashi, Differential geometry of complex vector bundles, Iwanami-Princeton Univ

S. Kobayashi, Differential geometry of complex vector bundles, Iwanami-Princeton Univ. Press, 1987

1987
[30]

Lu, On the geometry of classifying spaces and horizontal slices , Amer

Z. Lu, On the geometry of classifying spaces and horizontal slices , Amer. J. Math. 121 (1999), 177–198

1999
[31]

Lu, On the Hodge metric of the universal deformation space of Cal abi-Y au threefolds, J

Z. Lu, On the Hodge metric of the universal deformation space of Cal abi-Y au threefolds, J. Geom. Anal. 11 (2001), 103–118

2001
[32]

Lu and X

Z. Lu and X. Sun, W eil-Petersson geometry on moduli space of polarized Calab i-Y au manifolds, Jour. Inst. Math. Jussieu 3 (2004), 185–229

2004
[33]

M. P ˘aun, Relative adjoint transcendental classes and Albanese maps of compact Kaehler manifolds with nef Ricci curvature, in Advanced Studies in Pure Mathematics 74, (2017), Higher dimensional algebraic geometry, 335–356

2017
[34]

Popa and C

M. Popa and C. Schnell, Viehweg’s hyperbolicity conjecture for families with maxi mal variation , Inv. Math. 208 (2017), 677–713

2017
[35]

H. L. Royden, Intrinsic metrics on T eichmuller space , Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathe- maticians (V ancouver, BC, 1974). V ol. 2. 1974

1974
[36]

Shiffman, A

B. Shiffman, A. Sommese, V anishing theorems on complex manifolds, Birkhäuser, Boston, Basel, Stuttgart, 1985

1985
[37]

Schnell, Generic vanishing theorem, lectures notes available in his homepage

C. Schnell, Generic vanishing theorem, lectures notes available in his homepage
[38]

Schumacher, The curvature of the Petersson-W eil metric on the moduli space of Kähler-Einstein manifolds , Complex analysis and geometry, 339-354, Univ

G. Schumacher, The curvature of the Petersson-W eil metric on the moduli space of Kähler-Einstein manifolds , Complex analysis and geometry, 339-354, Univ. Ser. Math., P lenum, New Y ork, 1993

1993
[39]

Schumacher, Positivity of relative canonical bundles and applications , Invent

G. Schumacher, Positivity of relative canonical bundles and applications , Invent. Math. 190 (2012), 1–56

2012
[40]

Simpson, Higgs bundles and local systems , Publ

C. Simpson, Higgs bundles and local systems , Publ. I.H.E.S. 75 (1992), 5–95

1992
[41]

Sun, Note on geodesic rays and simple test conﬁgurations

S. Sun, Note on geodesic rays and simple test conﬁgurations . J. Symplectic Geom. 8 (2010), 57–65

2010
[42]

W . K. To and S. K. Y eung, Finsler Metrics and Kobayashi hyperbolicity of the moduli s paces of canonically polarized manifolds, Ann. Math. 181 (2015), 547–586

2015
[43]

Viehweg and K

E. Viehweg and K. Zuo, On the Brody hyperbolicity of moduli spaces for canonically polarized manifolds , Duke Math. J. 118 (2003), 103–150,

2003
[44]

Wan, Remarks on the geodesic–Einstein metrics of a relative ampl e line bundle (with an appendix by Xu W ang), arXiv:1808.06435

X. Wan, Remarks on the geodesic–Einstein metrics of a relative ampl e line bundle (with an appendix by Xu W ang), arXiv:1808.06435

arXiv
[45]

Wan and X

X. Wan and X. Wang, Poisson–Kähler ﬁbration II: local existence theory , TBA
[46]

Wan and G

X. Wan and G. Zhang, The asymptotic of curvature of direct image bundle associat ed with higher powers of a relative ample line bundles , arXiv: 1712.05922v1, 2017

2017 arXiv
[47]

Wang, A curvature formula associated to a family of pseudoconvex d omains, arXiv:1508.00242

X. Wang, A curvature formula associated to a family of pseudoconvex d omains, arXiv:1508.00242

arXiv
[48]

Wang, Curvature of higher direct image sheaves and its applicatio n on negative-curvature criterion for the W eil-Petersson metric, arXiv: 1607.03265

X. Wang, Curvature of higher direct image sheaves and its applicatio n on negative-curvature criterion for the W eil-Petersson metric, arXiv: 1607.03265

arXiv
[50]

Wang, Curvature restrictions on a manifold with a ﬂat Higgs bundle , arXiv: 1608.00777

X. Wang, Curvature restrictions on a manifold with a ﬂat Higgs bundle , arXiv: 1608.00777

arXiv
[51]

Wang, A ﬂat Higgs bundle structure on the complexiﬁed Kähler cone , arXiv: arXiv:1612.02182

X. Wang, A ﬂat Higgs bundle structure on the complexiﬁed Kähler cone , arXiv: arXiv:1612.02182

arXiv
[52]

Wells, Differential analysis on complex manifolds

R. Wells, Differential analysis on complex manifolds. Third edition. With a new appendix by Oscar Garcia- Prada. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 65. Springer, New Y ork, 2008. POISSON–KÄHLER FIBRA TION I 53

2008
[53]

Wolpert, Chern forms and the Riemann tensor for the mo duli space of curves, Invent

S. Wolpert, Chern forms and the Riemann tensor for the mo duli space of curves, Invent. Math. 85 (1986), no. 1, 119–145. XUEYUAN WAN: SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICS, KIAS, HEOGIRO 85, DONGD AEMUN-GU SEOUL, 02455, REPUBLIC OF KOREA E-mail address: xwan@kias.re.kr XU WANG: DEPARTMENT OF ...

1986

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [10]

Berndtsson, M

B. Berndtsson, M. P ˘aun and X. Wang, Algebraic ﬁber spaces and curvature of higher direct images , arXiv:1704.02279

arXiv

[2] [49]

Notes on variation of Lefschetz star operator and $T$-Hodge theory

X. Wang, Notes on variation of Lefschetz star operator and T –Hodge theory , arXiv:1708.07332

work page Pith review arXiv

[3] [1]

L. V . Ahlfors, Some remarks on T eichmuller’s space of Riemann surfaces, Ann. Math. (1961), 171–191

work page 1961

[4] [2]

L. V . Ahlfors, Curvature properties of T eichmuller’s space, Journal d’Analyse Mathématique 9 (1961), 161– 176

work page 1961

[5] [3]

Aikou, Projective ﬂatness of complex Finsler metrics , Publ

T. Aikou, Projective ﬂatness of complex Finsler metrics , Publ. Math. Debrecen 63 (2003), no. 3, 343–362

work page 2003

[6] [4]

Arezzo and G

C. Arezzo and G. Tian, Inﬁnite geodesic rays in the space of Kähler potentials , Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5) 2 (2003), no. 4, 617–630

work page 2003

[7] [5]

Berndtsson, Convexity on the space of Kähler metrics , Ann

B. Berndtsson, Convexity on the space of Kähler metrics , Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. 22 (2013), 713–746

work page 2013

[8] [6]

Berndtsson, Curvature of vector bundles associated to holomorphic ﬁbra tions, Ann

B. Berndtsson, Curvature of vector bundles associated to holomorphic ﬁbra tions, Ann. Math. 169, (2009), 531–560

work page 2009