Inductive limits of compact quantum groups and their unitary representations

Ryosuke Sato

Inductive limits of compact quantum groups and their unitary representations

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A compatible system of compact quantum groups admits a W*-inductive limit quantum group, and for Uq(∞) tensor products of quantized characters are exactly products of q-Schur generating functions.

desk verdict A careful and useful construction of inductive-limit quantum groups, with a clean tensor product theorem; the concrete shift corollary rests on an imported formula that a referee should verify. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.03988 v2 pith:2PLQH4KN submitted 2019-08-12 math.OA math.PRmath.RT

Ryosuke Sato This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.OAmath.PRmath.RT MSC 46L6520G42

keywords compactquantumgroupsinductivelimitsW*-bialgebrasquantizedcharactersunitaryrepresentationsq-SchurgeneratingfunctionsGelfand-Tsetlingraphq-centralmeasures

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that a compatible sequence of compact quantum groups has a genuine limit object: a von Neumann algebra $W^*(G_\infty)$ equipped with a comultiplication, a unitary antipode, and a scaling automorphism group, built as the W*-inductive limit of the finite-stage group von Neumann algebras. On this limit, the normal KMS states—the quantized characters—are shown to be the same as the quantized characters previously defined on the associated AF-algebra, so the infinite object inherits a complete character theory. For the quantum unitary groups $U_q(N)$, the paper proves that the tensor product of two quantized characters corresponds to pointwise multiplication of their q-Schur generating functions. In particular, tensoring with the quantum determinant character indexed by $(k,k,\ldots)$ shifts every entry of an extreme character's parameter by $k$, giving the shift operators of q-Gelfand–Tsetlin probability theory a representation-theoretic meaning. If the construction is correct, the asymptotic representation theory of $U_q(\infty)$ and the analysis of q-central measures on the Gelfand–Tsetlin graph are two sides of the same limit quantum group.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the W*-inductive limit of the system $W^*(G_N)$: a von Neumann algebra formed from compatible normal inclusions, whose universal property forces a unique comultiplication $\hat\delta_\infty$, unitary antipode $\hat R_\infty$, and scaling automorphism group $\hat\tau^\infty_t$ on the limit. The AF-algebra $A(G)$ sits inside as a $\sigma$-weakly dense C*-subalgebra and carries the topology on the space of quantized characters. The computational engine for $U_q(\infty)$ is the q-Schur generating function $S(x;P_N)$, which records a quantized character by its restriction to the maximal torus; Theorem 4.1 reduces tensor products to multiplication of these series, and the quantum determinant series $S(x;P_N^{(k,k,\ldots)})=x_1^k(q^2x_2)^k\cdots(q^{2(N-1)}x_N)^k$ turns that multiplication into the shift $A_k$.

What would settle it

Take a concrete nondecreasing sequence $\theta$, a rank $N$, and a value of $q\in(0,1)$, and compare $S(x;P_N^{A_k\theta})$ with $S(x;P_N^\theta)S(x;P_N^{(k,k,\ldots)})$ at a generic point of the torus $|x_i|=q^{-2(i-1)}$; any mismatch for some $\theta,k,N,q$ disproves Corollary 4.1. A more fundamental check is whether every normal $\hat\tau^\infty$-KMS state on $W^*(U_q(\infty))$ restricts to a state of norm 1 on each $C^*(U_q(N))$—a normal KMS state whose restriction to some finite stage had norm below 1 would violate Theorem 3.1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the W*-inductive limit $W^*(G_\infty)$ of a compatible system $(G_N)$ carries a quantum group W*-algebra structure $(\hat\delta_\infty,\hat R_\infty,\hat\tau^\infty_t)$, and restriction to the dense AF-algebra $A(G)$ is an affine homeomorphism from the normal $\hat\tau^\infty$-KMS states on $W^*(G_\infty)$ onto the quantized characters of the system. For $U_q(\infty)$, the paper proves that $\chi = \chi_1 \boxtimes \chi_2$ holds exactly when, for every $N$, the q-Schur generating function of the corresponding q-coherent system factors as $S(x;P_N)=S(x;P_{1,N})S(x;P_{2,N})$. The concrete corollary is that $\chi_\theta \boxtimes \chi_{(k,k,\ldots)} = \chi_{A_k\theta}$, where $A_k$ adds $k$ to every entry of the nondecreasing integer sequence $\theta$; this identifies the shift operators appearing in q-central measure theory with tensor multiplication by powers of the quantum determinant.

Load-bearing premise

The concrete shift theorem relies on the prior parametrization of extreme quantized characters of $U_q(\infty)$ by nondecreasing integer sequences and on the shift identity for the associated q-coherent probability measures; if that parametrization or the shift identity fails, the representation-theoretic reading of the shifts $A_k$ fails even though the abstract W*-limit construction could still stand.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Any compatible system of compact quantum groups now has a well-defined limit quantum group W*-algebra with a unitary representation theory, not merely a conjectural C*-algebra.
For $U_q(\infty)$, the quantized characters form a Choquet simplex whose extreme points are parameterized by nondecreasing integer sequences, and the tensor product of any two quantized characters is again a quantized character.
Tensoring any extreme quantized character with the $k$-th power of the quantum determinant gives the extreme character indexed by the shifted sequence $A_k\theta$, so the transformations $A_k$ are exactly tensor multiplication by determinant characters.
The factor representations attached to extreme quantized characters obey the type rule $\text{type } X \otimes \text{type } I_1 = \text{type } X$ for $X = I_1, I_\infty,$ or $II_{q^2}$.
Spherical representations and spherical functions for quantum group W*-algebras correspond bijectively to quantized characters, with extreme characters matching irreducible spherical representations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The product formula suggests that the tensor product on quantized characters of $U_q(\infty)$ is isomorphic to pointwise multiplication of positive definite functions on a boundary, so the full semigroup structure may be described without mentioning the W*-algebra at all.
Because the shift $A_k$ arises from the quantum determinant, analogous transformations should appear in the $(q,t)$-deformed Gelfand–Tsetlin graph and in Macdonald-polynomial asymptotics, not only in the q-central measures treated here.
A natural testable extension is to compute the tensor product of two arbitrary extreme characters $\chi_\theta$ and $\chi_{\theta'}$: the paper's theorem says the q-Schur series multiply, but it does not give a closed formula on the parameter space $\mathbb{N}$, and finding one would sharpen the connection to q-central measures.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

This paper is worth your time. It does what the title says: it constructs inductive limits of compact quantum groups as quantum group W*-algebras via Takeda's W*-inductive limit, and shows that the normal KMS states of the limit object are exactly the quantized characters from Sato's earlier work. That is a real step forward: previously the 'inductive limit quantum group' was only a conjectural object behind the AF-algebra A(G); now it exists explicitly, with comultiplication, antipode, and scaling group coming from the finite stages. For Uq(∞), the tensor product theorem (Theorem 4.1) is clean and useful: tensor product of quantized characters corresponds to multiplication of q-Schur generating functions. That genuinely connects the operator-algebraic picture with the q-Gelfand-Tsetlin graph asymptotics, and it gives a representation-theoretic reading of the shift transformations A_k that appear in Gorin's work. The main construction in Section 3 is careful; the compatibility checks with the restriction maps are done, and the proof of Theorem 3.1, identifying characters with certain KMS states on A(G), is plausible and fills a gap in the earlier paper.

The soft spots are real but not fatal. Corollary 4.1, the concrete description of tensoring with the determinant representation, leans entirely on the identity P_N^{A_kθ} = P_N^θ ∘ A_{-k}, cited to [7, Proposition 5.13]. The paper does not derive or numerically test this identity, and the q-normalization in this paper could conceivably differ from Gorin's convention. A referee should check that the conventions match; if they do, the corollary follows immediately. Also, the appendix on spherical representations leaves Lemma A.1(1)(2) and Proposition A.1 to the reader, which is a bit thin for a published paper. Lemma 3.1 (extreme iff factorial) is proved only by citation; that is standard theory, so acceptable, but the reader cannot tell if the general setting requires a small extra argument. There are a few typos (e.g., P_N^{(k)} vs P_N^{(k,k,...)}).

Who is this for? Anyone working on infinite-dimensional quantum groups, quantized characters, or asymptotic representation theory of Uq(∞). It is a solid extension of prior work, not a revolution, and the author is honest about what is imported. It deserves a serious referee. The referee's main job is to verify the consistency between this paper's conventions and [7] and [16], and to decide whether the appendix should be expanded or cut. I would accept it for peer review, and I'd expect the referee to require a small revision, not a rejection.

Recommendation: send to referees. The central construction is sound, and the tensor product theorem is a valuable addition.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper defines inductive limits of compact quantum groups as quantum group W*-algebras. Given a compatible inductive system (G_N), the author uses Takeda's W*-inductive limit to construct W*(G∞) with a comultiplication, unitary antipode, and scaling automorphism group, and identifies the normal KMS states of W*(G∞) with the quantized characters of the associated AF algebra A(G) from earlier work. For the system U_q(N), the paper shows that the tensor product of quantized characters corresponds to multiplication of q-Schur generating functions (Theorem 4.1), and derives that tensoring an extreme quantized character with the quantum determinant character shifts the parameter by A_k (Corollary 4.1). An appendix sketches a spherical representation framework.

Significance. The construction is a useful explicit realization of an infinite-dimensional compact quantum group as a W*-bialgebra, and it gives the advertised representation-theoretic interpretation of the shift operators A_k appearing in the analysis of q-central measures. The core arguments are concrete: Proposition 4.1 reduces the tensor-product statement to a matrix calculation, and Theorem 4.1 follows from the density of the finite-rank subalgebras. The paper is honest about its reliance on the author's earlier work [16] and on Gorin's [7] for the parametrization of extreme q-coherent systems; this is a legitimate use of prior results rather than a circularity. My main reservations are expository: some notation is ambiguous and a few standard steps are left implicit.

minor comments (6)

[§4.2, Eq. (4.1)] The symbol T_N is used for two different tori: the q-torus {|x_i|=q^{-2(i-1)}} on which S converges, and the domain of (z_1,...,z_N) in (4.1), which should be the ordinary torus. Please use distinct notation and state explicitly that the arguments entering S in (4.1) are z_1, q^{-2}z_2, ..., q^{-2(N-1)}z_N.
[Theorem 3.1, proof] After obtaining the normal extension ~π of the GNS representation of a KMS state φ on A(G), the proof jumps directly to the bijection; please add a sentence explaining that the normal state χ = ⟨~π(·)ξ,ξ⟩ satisfies the KMS condition by continuity from the dense subalgebra A(G) and normality of τ∞.
[Corollary 4.1, proof] The proof invokes [7, Prop. 5.13] for P_N^{A_kθ}=P_N^θ∘A_{-k}. Since the q-coherent systems in this paper are defined with the weight w_q from §4.2, please add a remark stating that this is the same normalization as in Gorin's q-Gelfand–Tsetlin graph, or give a short direct verification using the shift invariance of w_q and of the quantum dimension ratio. This would fully dispel any concern about a q↔q^{-1} or q^2 convention mismatch; I do not regard the citation itself as a gap.
[§3.1, Eq. (3.3); Remark 2.1] Equation (3.3) contains a typo: the first line should read δ∞∘τ∞ = (τ∞⊗τ∞)∘δ∞, not δ∞∘τ∞ = (τ∞⊗τ∞)∘δG. Also, in Remark 2.1, 'tratical' should be 'tracial'.
[Appendix A] Lemma A.1(1),(2) and Proposition A.1 are left to the reader; in particular, the proof of Lemma A.1(2) (irreducibility iff extreme) is non-obvious and is used in Proposition A.2. It would be helpful to include at least a brief indication of the argument.
[Corollary 4.1, proof] The expression 's_{(k,...,k)}(1,q^{-2} . . . , q^{-2(L-1)})' should be written with explicit commas for readability, and the first displayed denominator should include the full list of arguments.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the W*-inductive limit and tensor-product results are derived from comultiplication identities and prior independent theorems, not from the conclusions they advertise.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. In Section 3, W*(G∞) is constructed via Takeda's W*-inductive limit, and the comultiplication δ∞, antipode R∞, and scaling group τ∞ are obtained from the compatibility equations (3.1)-(3.2) and the universal property of the inductive limit; these structures are not assumed as part of the conclusion. Theorem 3.1 is an identification theorem: it proves that normal τ∞-KMS states on W*(G∞) correspond to the previously studied KMS states on A(G) with ‖χ|C*(GN)‖=1, using Lemmas 3.3-3.4 rather than defining the new notion in terms of the old one. Section 4's tensor-product criterion (Proposition 4.1 and Theorem 4.1) follows from the comultiplication identity involving U23U13 and the σ-weak density of the union of W*(Uq(N)); the product of q-Schur generating functions is computed, not fitted. Corollary 4.1 imports two prior results: the parametrization of extreme quantized characters by N (from [16] and [7]) and Gorin's shift formula P_N^{A_kθ}=P_N^θ∘A_{-k} ([7, Prop. 5.13]). These are independently published, externally falsifiable inputs; using them to give A_k a representation-theoretic interpretation does not assume the tensor-product conclusion. Whether Gorin's formula or the parametrization is correct under the same q-normalization is a correctness and robustness question, not circularity. The self-citations ([16], [17]) point to prior work on which the present construction builds, but the central W*-limit and tensor-product arguments do not reduce to those citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numbers are fitted to data; q is the fixed deformation parameter of Uq(N). The construction depends on imported operator-algebraic theorems and prior character parametrizations, listed above. The new object W*(G∞) is constructed, not postulated, so no invented entities are counted.

assumptions (4)

standard math Takeda's W*-inductive limit construction and its universality, including the SOT density equalities for tensor products, are valid for the inductive system (W*(G_N), Θ_N).
Invoked in Section 3.1 to define W*(G∞), δ∞, R∞, τ∞ and to identify A(G) inside W*(G∞); the paper cites [21] rather than proving these facts.
domain assumption Each compact quantum group W*-algebra W*(G_N) is assumed to have a faithful Haar state and to be generated as universal C*-algebra by its finite-dimensional matrix coefficients.
Stated near the end of Section 2 and used for the faithful embedding into B(L2(G)) and for Proposition 2.1 and Theorem 3.1.
domain assumption The set of extreme quantized characters of Uq(∞) is parametrized by N, and the shift relation P_N^{A_k θ}=P_N^θ∘A_{-k} for the associated q-coherent systems holds.
Taken from the author's prior paper [16, Section 3] and Gorin [7, Proposition 5.13]; used in Section 4.2 and in the proof of Corollary 4.1.
standard math Standard Schur polynomial identities, in particular s_(k^L)(x1,...,xL)=(x1...xL)^k, and the absolute convergence of q-Schur generating functions on T_N.
Used in Corollary 4.1 to evaluate the quantum determinant character; standard results in symmetric function theory, cited via [7].

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Inductive limits of compact quantum groups and their unitary representations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2PLQH4KN

@misc{pith2026190803988,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Inductive limits of compact quantum groups and their unitary representations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2PLQH4KN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.03988}
}

abstract

We will introduce the notion of inductive limits of compact quantum groups as $W^*$-bialgebras equipped with some additional structures. We also formulate their unitary representation theories. Those give a more explicit representation-theoretic meaning to our previous study of quantized characters associated with a given inductive system of compact quantum groups. As a byproduct, we will give an explicit representation-theoretic interpretation to some transformations that play an important role in the analysis of $q$-central probability measures on the paths in the Gelfand-Tsetlin graph.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

[7]

Gorin, The q-Gelfand–Tsetlin graph, Gibbs measures and q-Toeplitz matrices, Adv

V. Gorin, The q-Gelfand–Tsetlin graph, Gibbs measures and q-Toeplitz matrices, Adv. Math. 229 (2012), 201–266

work page 2012
[16]

Sato, Quantized Vershik–Kerov theory and quantized central probability measures on branching graphs, Journal of Funct

R. Sato, Quantized Vershik–Kerov theory and quantized central probability measures on branching graphs, Journal of Funct. Anal. , 277 (2019), 2522–2557

work page 2019
[1]

Blackadar, Operator Algebras : Theory of C∗ -Algebras and von Neumann Algebras , Encyclopedia of Mathematical Sciences 122, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2006

B. Blackadar, Operator Algebras : Theory of C∗ -Algebras and von Neumann Algebras , Encyclopedia of Mathematical Sciences 122, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2006

work page 2006
[2]

Bratteli, D

O. Bratteli, D. W. Robinson, Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics 1. Equ ilibrium states. Models in quantum statistical mechanics. Second edition , Texts and Monographs in Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1997

work page 1997
[3]

Bratteli, D

O. Bratteli, D. W. Robinson, Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics 2. Equ ilibrium states. Models in quantum statistical mechanics. Second edition , Texts and Monographs in Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1997

work page 1997
[4]

Borodin, G

A. Borodin, G. Olshanski, Harmonic analysis on the inﬁni te-dimensional unitary group and determinantal point processes, Ann. of Math. (2) 161 (2005), no. 3, 1319–1422

work page 2005
[5]

Cuenca, Asymptotic Formulas for Macdonald Polynomia ls and the Boundary of the ( q, t)-Gelfand–Tsetlin graph, SIGMA 14 (2018), No

C. Cuenca, Asymptotic Formulas for Macdonald Polynomia ls and the Boundary of the ( q, t)-Gelfand–Tsetlin graph, SIGMA 14 (2018), No. 001, 66pp

work page 2018
[6]

Enomoto, M

T. Enomoto, M. Izumi, Indecomposable characters of inﬁn ite dimensional groups associated with operator algebras, J. Math. Soc. Japan 68 (2016), no. 3, 1231–1270

work page 2016

Show all 27 references

[8]

Hirai, E

T. Hirai, E. Hirai, Positive deﬁnite class functions on a topological group and characters of factor represen- tations, J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 45 (2005), no. 2, 355–376

2005
[9]

Klimyk, K

A. Klimyk, K. Schm¨ udgen, Quantum Groups and Their Representations , Texts and Monographs in Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1997

1997
[10]

Masuda, Y

T. Masuda, Y. Nakagami, A von Neumann algebra framework for the duality of the quantum groups, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 30(1994), no. 5, 799–850

1994
[11]

Neshveyev, L

S. Neshveyev, L. Tuset, Compact Quantum Groups and Their Representation Categorie s, Soc. Math. France., 2013

2013
[12]

Noumi, H

M. Noumi, H. Yamada, K. Mimachi, Finite dimensional rep resentations of the quantum group GLq(n; C) and the zonal spherical functions on Uq(n − 1)\Uq(n), Japan J. Math. 19 (1993), no. 1, 31–80

1993
[13]

Olshanski, Unitary representations of inﬁnite-dim ensional pairs ( G, K) and the formalism of R

G. Olshanski, Unitary representations of inﬁnite-dim ensional pairs ( G, K) and the formalism of R. Howe, In Representation of Lie groups and related topics (A. M. Vershik and D. P. Zhelobenko, eds.), Adv. Stud. Comtemp. Math. 7, Gordon and Breach, New York, 1990, 269–468

1990
[14]

Olshanski, The problem of harmonic analysis on the in ﬁnite-dimensional unitary group, Journal of Funct

G. Olshanski, The problem of harmonic analysis on the in ﬁnite-dimensional unitary group, Journal of Funct. Anal., 205 (2003), 464–524

2003
[15]

Podle´ s, S

P. Podle´ s, S. L. W oronowicz, Quantum Deformation of Lo rentz Group, Commun. Math. Phys. 130 (1990), 381–431

1990
[17]

Sato, Type classiﬁcation of extreme quantized chara cters, Ergodic Theory Dynam

R. Sato, Type classiﬁcation of extreme quantized chara cters, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems , to appear. INDUCTIVE LIMITS OF COMPACT QUANTUM GROUPS AND THEIR UNITAR Y REPRESENTATIONS 17
[18]

Stratila, D

S. Stratila, D. Voiculescu, Representations of AF-Algebras and of the Group U (∞), Lecture Notes in Math- ematics 486, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1975

1975
[19]

Takeda, On the representations of operator algebra, Proc

Z. Takeda, On the representations of operator algebra, Proc. Japan Acad. 30 (1954), 299–304

1954
[20]

Takeda, On the representations of operator algebra I I, Tˆ ohoku Math

Z. Takeda, On the representations of operator algebra I I, Tˆ ohoku Math. J.(2)6 (1954), 212–219

1954
[21]

Takeda, Inductive limit and inﬁnite direct product o f operator algebras, Tˆ ohoku Math

Z. Takeda, Inductive limit and inﬁnite direct product o f operator algebras, Tˆ ohoku Math. J. (2)7 (1955), 67–86

1955
[22]

Takesaki, Algebraic equivalence of locally normal r epresentations, Paciﬁc J

M. Takesaki, Algebraic equivalence of locally normal r epresentations, Paciﬁc J. Math. 34 (1970), 807–816

1970
[23]

Takesaki, Theory of Operator Algebras I I , Encyclopedia of Mathematical Sciences 127, Springer, 2003

M. Takesaki, Theory of Operator Algebras I I , Encyclopedia of Mathematical Sciences 127, Springer, 2003

2003
[24]

Tomatsu, A characterization of right coideals of quo tient type and its application to classiﬁcation of Poisson boundaries, Commun

R. Tomatsu, A characterization of right coideals of quo tient type and its application to classiﬁcation of Poisson boundaries, Commun. Math. Phys. 275 (2007), 271–296

2007
[25]

Voiculescu, Repr´ esentations factorielles de type I I de U (∞), J

D. Voiculescu, Repr´ esentations factorielles de type I I de U (∞), J. Math. Pures Appl. 55 (1976), 1–20

1976
[26]

Yamagami, On unitary representation theories of com pact quantum groups, Commun

S. Yamagami, On unitary representation theories of com pact quantum groups, Commun. Math. Phys. , 167 (1995), 509–529

1995
[27]

D. P. ˘Zelobenko, Compact Lie groups and their representations, Translations of Mathematical Monographs 40, Amer. Math. Soc., 1973. Graduate School of Mathematics, Nagoya University, Chikusak u, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan E-mail address : d19001r@math.nagoya-u.ac.jp

1973

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [7]

Gorin, The q-Gelfand–Tsetlin graph, Gibbs measures and q-Toeplitz matrices, Adv

V. Gorin, The q-Gelfand–Tsetlin graph, Gibbs measures and q-Toeplitz matrices, Adv. Math. 229 (2012), 201–266

work page 2012

[2] [16]

Sato, Quantized Vershik–Kerov theory and quantized central probability measures on branching graphs, Journal of Funct

R. Sato, Quantized Vershik–Kerov theory and quantized central probability measures on branching graphs, Journal of Funct. Anal. , 277 (2019), 2522–2557

work page 2019

[3] [1]

Blackadar, Operator Algebras : Theory of C∗ -Algebras and von Neumann Algebras , Encyclopedia of Mathematical Sciences 122, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2006

B. Blackadar, Operator Algebras : Theory of C∗ -Algebras and von Neumann Algebras , Encyclopedia of Mathematical Sciences 122, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2006

work page 2006

[4] [2]

Bratteli, D

O. Bratteli, D. W. Robinson, Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics 1. Equ ilibrium states. Models in quantum statistical mechanics. Second edition , Texts and Monographs in Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1997

work page 1997

[5] [3]

Bratteli, D

O. Bratteli, D. W. Robinson, Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics 2. Equ ilibrium states. Models in quantum statistical mechanics. Second edition , Texts and Monographs in Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1997

work page 1997

[6] [4]

Borodin, G

A. Borodin, G. Olshanski, Harmonic analysis on the inﬁni te-dimensional unitary group and determinantal point processes, Ann. of Math. (2) 161 (2005), no. 3, 1319–1422

work page 2005

[7] [5]

Cuenca, Asymptotic Formulas for Macdonald Polynomia ls and the Boundary of the ( q, t)-Gelfand–Tsetlin graph, SIGMA 14 (2018), No

C. Cuenca, Asymptotic Formulas for Macdonald Polynomia ls and the Boundary of the ( q, t)-Gelfand–Tsetlin graph, SIGMA 14 (2018), No. 001, 66pp

work page 2018

[8] [6]

Enomoto, M

T. Enomoto, M. Izumi, Indecomposable characters of inﬁn ite dimensional groups associated with operator algebras, J. Math. Soc. Japan 68 (2016), no. 3, 1231–1270

work page 2016