Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 63 references

Operator inequalities I. Models and ergodicity

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that a broad class of hereditary operator inequalities force the operator to be a part of a weighted backward shift, provided the reciprocal power series k=1/α satisfies a convolution decay condition.

desk verdict A careful, honest extension of Agler model theory beyond the Nevanlinna-Pick class; the main theorem is new and the proof is sound, with one imported Banach-algebra step worth checking. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.05032 v3 pith:QZYCDIPJ submitted 2019-08-14 math.FA

Luciano Abadias , Glenier Bello-Burguet , Dmitry Yakubovich This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.FA MSC 47A4547A6347B3746E2247A35
keywords operatorinequalitiesfunctionalmodelsweightedbackwardshiftsreproducingkernelHilbertspacesergodictheorya-contractionsstrongtopologydefectoperators
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks when a bounded Hilbert-space operator satisfying a general hereditary inequality of the form α(T*,T)≥0 can be modeled, up to unitary equivalence, as a part of the backward weighted shift B_k tensored with the identity, possibly plus an isometry. It proves that this is true whenever the reciprocal power series k=1/α has positive coefficients, lies in the Wiener algebra with $k_n^{{1/n}}$→1, has bounded consecutive quotients, and satisfies a convolution decay condition. Earlier results of this kind required the kernel to have non-positive Taylor coefficients from degree one on; this paper removes that restriction and shows the prescribed signs of finitely many coefficients can be arbitrary. The consequence is that many operators governed by inequalities of this type share the ergodic and structural behavior of contractions, without being contractions themselves.

What carries the argument

The central object is the weighted backward shift B_k acting on the reproducing kernel Hilbert space H_k, whose norm weights the Taylor coefficients by k_n. The key identity is α(t)k(t)=1, which turns convolutions of coefficients into Kronecker deltas and is what makes the map V_D an isometry. Condition (1.5) is the mechanism that makes ℓ∞(1/k) a Banach algebra under convolution and guarantees α=1/k lies there with |α_n|≲k_n; that coefficient bound is what makes the defect operator well behaved and lets the proof build the model.

What would settle it

Run a finite-dimensional test: choose a polynomial α meeting Hypotheses 1.1 with at least one positive coefficient among α_2,...,α_N, and let k=1/α with the perturbation construction of Example 5.1 ensuring (1.5). For every 2×2 matrix T with α(T*,T)≥0, the theorem predicts T is unitarily equivalent to a part of B_k⊗I_E. A single 2×2 example where this fails would refute Theorem 1.5; the paper's proof indicates such a failure would have to show up as a violation of the estimate |α_n|≲k_n or of the isometric intertwining.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Let α be in the Wiener algebra, with α(0)=1 and no zeros on the closed disc, and let k=1/α have all positive Taylor coefficients. If k is itself in the Wiener algebra, $k_n^{{1/n}}$→1, sup_n k_n/k_{n+1}<∞, and the convolution sums lim_{m→∞} sup_{n≥2m} ∑_{m≤j≤n/2} k_j k_{n−j}/k_n tend to 0, then B_k is bounded and a Hilbert-space operator T is unitarily equivalent to a part of B_k⊗I_E exactly when both series ∑|α_n|$T^{{*n}}$T^n and ∑ k_n $T^{{*n}}$T^n converge in the strong operator topology and α(T*,T)≥0. In that case the auxiliary space can be taken to be the defect space, the closure of the range of the defect operator D=(α(T*,T))^{1/2}. The proof runs through the weighted Banach algebra ℓ∞(1/k): condition (1.5) makes it a Banach algebra in which α=1/k has coefficients controlled by k_n, and this converts the operator inequality into an isometric intertwining relation between T and B_k⊗I_D.

Load-bearing premise

The proof's load-bearing premise is that the convolution sums in (1.5) decay to zero uniformly in n; nothing else in the paper shows the equivalence would survive without this decay, and condition (1.5) is not derived from the other assumptions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Outside the previously treated sign-restricted case, there exist kernels k satisfying the theorem for which the early coefficients α_2,...,α_N have any prescribed signs, so the model covers genuinely new classes of operators.
  • For fractional exponents 0<a<1, every a-contraction is quadratically (C,b)-bounded for b>1−a, and the presence of the isometric part in its model is exactly detected by whether liminf ‖T^n x‖=0 for all x.
  • For a-contractions, the model gives mean ergodicity and a direct-sum decomposition H=Ker(I−T)⊕Ran(I−T).
  • When the defect space is finite-dimensional and R_k is a Banach algebra, the part of the spectrum inside the disc lies in the zero set of a nonzero function from R_k, and under a tail estimate on k_n the complementary arcs satisfy a logarithmic summability condition.
  • Strong operator convergence is the right convergence for the hereditary series: examples show that uniform convergence can fail even when the model exists.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The convolution condition (1.5) is likely close to necessary for the whole equivalence, since it is exactly what creates the Banach-algebra estimate |α_n|≲k_n; a weight sequence satisfying all other hypotheses but violating (1.5) would mark the boundary of the theorem.
  • The explicit model with the defect-space map V_D suggests that the same construction may work for tuples of commuting operators once a suitable multi-index analogue of (1.5) controls the convolution sums.
  • The ergodic dichotomy for a-contractions may transfer to any α whose reciprocal k behaves like a fractional power, yielding mean-ergodic decompositions for larger families than (1−t)^a alone.
  • The non-uniqueness of the minimal model in the subcritical case hints that one should look for additional gauges, such as maximal wandering subspaces, to single out a canonical model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies bounded Hilbert space operators T satisfying a hereditary inequality α(T*,T) ≥ 0, where α is in the Wiener algebra AW, α(0)=1, and k=1/α has positive Taylor coefficients. The main result (Theorem 1.5) gives sufficient conditions, including the convolution decay condition (1.5), under which T is unitarily equivalent to a part of a backward shift B_k ⊗ I_E if and only if the series Σ|α_n|T*^nT^n and Σ k_n T*^nT^n converge in SOT and α(T*,T) ≥ 0. The paper also constructs an explicit model (Theorem 1.8), studies uniqueness of the minimal model (Theorem 1.12), derives a Carleson-type conclusion for finite-rank defect (Theorem 1.13), and establishes ergodic properties of a-contractions for 0 < a < 1 (Theorems 1.14 and 1.15).

Significance. The result is significant because it extends Agler-type functional models beyond the Nevanlinna-Pick setting: Example 5.1 shows that the coefficients α_n may have arbitrary prescribed signs, which is impossible under the classical hypothesis α_n ≤ 0. The proof of Theorem 1.5 is largely self-contained, with the main external input being the Banach-algebra inversion theorem from [29]; Remark 5.3 provides a direct proof of the needed result under a stronger hypothesis. The ergodic consequences for a-contractions are new and are obtained by combining the model with explicit estimates on the backward shift. The paper is carefully written and the arguments are coherent.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 1.3, after Theorem 1.5] The phrase 'the the SOT-convergence' should be corrected to 'the SOT-convergence'.
  2. [Section 4, proof of Theorem 1.5] In the first paragraph of the proof, 'let us prove that B_k ∈ C^w_α ∩ Adm^w_k' should read 'let us prove that T ∈ C^w_α ∩ Adm^w_k'.
  3. [Section 4, Theorem 4.2] The proof of the key estimate |α_n| ≲ k_n relies on [29, Lemma 3.6.3 and Theorem 3.4.1]; since this is load-bearing for Theorem 1.5, a sentence spelling out why these results apply to ω_n = 1/k_n under (1.5) would be helpful, especially because Remark 5.3 covers only the stronger condition (5.2).
  4. [Throughout] The paper alternates between 'Hypothesis 1.1' and 'Hypotheses 1.1' (for example, in Section 2.2 and Theorem 1.12); please standardize the terminology.
  5. [Section 7, Lemma 7.14] The use of the letter 'a' for both the exponent in (C,a)-boundedness and the parameter of the shift B_s is confusing; consider renaming one of the parameters.
  6. [Section 7, proof of Theorem 1.15] The proof of the implication (ii)⇒(iii) is a contrapositive; the wording 'Suppose now that lim inf ||T^n x|| > 0' could be made clearer by explicitly stating 'for some x ∈ H'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main model theorem is proved from the stated hypotheses via independent external Banach-algebra results, and the self-citations are contextual rather than load-bearing.

full rationale

The central claim, Theorem 1.5, is a genuine derivation rather than a restatement of its inputs. The model class is defined via the backward shift B_k on H_k with k = 1/alpha, and the theorem's 'if and only if' is proved by constructing the isometric transform V_D x = D(I - zT)^{-1}x and by verifying that B_k itself lies in C^w_alpha via the identity alpha(t)k(t) = 1. The key coefficient estimate |alpha_n| << k_n is obtained from Theorem 4.2, whose inversion statement is quoted from the external paper [29] by El-Fallah, Nikolski and Zarrabi, not from the authors' own work. Condition (1.5) enters exactly as the hypothesis (4.2) of that theorem with omega_n = 1/k_n, so it is an explicit restriction, not a quantity fitted from the data. No parameter is fitted inside the derivation, and the conclusion is not built into any definition: the inequality alpha(T*,T) >= 0 does not by itself assert modelability, and the proof supplies the model. The self-citations [11] and the forthcoming [1] are used only for comparison, motivation, and future work; they do not carry the proof of Theorem 1.5. The proof of Theorem 1.12(ii) refers to Theorem 1.5, but the text explicitly notes that Theorem 1.5 is proved independently, so there is no circular dependency. The only notable exposure is that the crucial inversion theorem behind Theorem 4.2 is imported from [29] rather than proved in full generality in this paper; that is a legitimate reliance on an external published result and a possible verification risk, not circularity. Example 5.1 shows the result genuinely covers non-Nevanlinna-Pick kernels with arbitrary prescribed signs, so the work is not a renaming of the known Nevanlinna-Pick theorem [21].

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central theorems rest on standard operator theory and on three quoted external results: the Beurling-Sobolev algebra theorem from El-Fallah, Nikolski and Zarrabi (used in Theorem 1.5), the Nevanlinna-Pick model theorem of Clouâtre and Hartz (used for a-contractions), and Shields' criterion for R_k to be a Banach algebra (used in the finite-defect section). No free parameters are fitted and no new entities are postulated.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Theorem 4.2 (from [29]): Under (4.2) and ω_n^{1/n}→1, ℓ∞(ω) is a Banach algebra and if f ∈ ℓ∞(ω) does not vanish on D, then 1/f ∈ ℓ∞(ω).
    Used in the proof of Theorem 1.5 to show α=1/k ∈ ℓ∞(ω), hence |α_n| ≲ k_n; this coefficient bound is essential throughout the proof.
  • domain assumption Theorem 1.4 (from [21]): For Nevanlinna-Pick kernels satisfying (1.4), T is α-modelable if and only if α(T*,T) ≥ 0.
    Used to obtain the model for (1−t)^a-contractions, 0<a<1, from which the ergodic Theorems 1.14 and 1.15 are derived.
  • domain assumption Shields [60, Proposition 32]: a sufficient condition for R_k to be a Banach algebra with respect to power series multiplication.
    Used in Section 6 to define the module structure needed for the finite-defect theorems 6.1 and 1.13.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Operator inequalities I. Models and ergodicity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QZYCDIPJ

@misc{pith2026190805032,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Operator inequalities I. Models and ergodicity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QZYCDIPJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.05032}
}
read the original abstract

We discuss when an operator, subject to a rather general inequality in hereditary form, admits a unitarily equivalent functional model of Agler type in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space associated to the inequality. To the contrary to the previous work, the kernel need not be of Nevanlinna-Pick type. We derive some consequences concerning the ergodic behavior of the operator.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [29]

    `El’ F alla, N

    O. `El’ F alla, N. K. Nikol’ski˘ı, and M. Zarrabi , Estimates for resolvents in Beurling-Sobolev algebras , Algebra i Analiz, 10 (1998, English transl. in St. Petersbur g Math. J. 10 (1999), no. 6, 901–964), pp. 1–92

    work page 1999

  2. [21]

    Clouˆatre and M

    R. Clouˆatre and M. Hartz , Multiplier algebras of complete Nevanlinna-Pick spaces: d ilations, boundary representations and hyperrigidity , J. Funct. Anal., 274 (2018), pp. 1690–1738

    work page 2018

  3. [1]

    Functional models up to similarity and $a$-contractions

    L. Abadias, G. Bello, and D. Yakubovich , Functional models up to similarity and a-contractions, Preprint, arXiv:2005.00075

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  4. [2]

    Abadias and A

    L. Abadias and A. Bonilla , Growth orders and ergodicity for absolutely Ces` aro bounde d operators , Linear Algebra Appl., 561 (2019), pp. 253–267

    work page 2019

  5. [3]

    Poisson equation and discrete one-sided Hilbert transform for $(C,\alpha)$-bounded operators

    L. Abadias, J. E. Gal ´e, and C. Lizama , Poisson equation and discrete one-sided Hilbert transform for (C, α )-bounded operators, Preprint, arXiv:2002.10122

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  6. [4]

    Abadias, C

    L. Abadias, C. Lizama, P. J. Miana, and M. P. Velasco , Ces` aro sums and algebra homomorphisms of bounded operators, Israel J. Math., 216 (2016), pp. 471–505

    work page 2016

  7. [5]

    Agler , The Arveson extension theorem and coanalytic models , Integral Equations Operator Theory, 5 (1982), pp

    J. Agler , The Arveson extension theorem and coanalytic models , Integral Equations Operator Theory, 5 (1982), pp. 608–631

    work page 1982

  8. [6]

    Operator Theory, 13 (1985), pp

    , Hypercontractions and subnormality , J. Operator Theory, 13 (1985), pp. 203–217

    work page 1985

Show all 63 references
  1. [7]

    Agler and J

    J. Agler and J. E. McCarthy , Pick interpolation and Hilbert function spaces , vol. 44 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics, American Mathematical Society, Pr ovidence, RI, 2002

    2002

  2. [8]

    Aleman, H

    A. Aleman, H. k. Hedenmalm, and S. Richter , Recent progress and open problems in the Bergman space, in Quadrature domains and their applications, vol. 156 of O per. Theory Adv. Appl., Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 2005, pp. 27–59

    2005

  3. [9]

    Aleman and L

    A. Aleman and L. Suciu , On ergodic operator means in Banach spaces , Integral Equations Operator Theory, 85 (2016), pp. 259–287

    2016

  4. [10]

    J. A. Ball and V. Bolotnikov , Weighted Hardy spaces: shift invariant and coinvariant sub spaces, linear systems and operator model theory , Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged), 79 (2013), pp. 623–686

    2013

  5. [11]

    Bello-Burguet and D

    G. Bello-Burguet and D. Yakubovich , Operator inequalities implying similarity to a contractio n, Complex Anal. Oper. Theory, 13 (2019), pp. 1325–1360

    2019

  6. [12]

    B ´en´eteau, M

    C. B ´en´eteau, M. C. Fleeman, D. S. Khavinson, D. Seco, and A. A. Sola , Remarks on inner functions and optimal approximants , Canad. Math. Bull., 61 (2018), pp. 704–716

    2018

  7. [13]

    Berm ´udez, A

    T. Berm ´udez, A. Bonilla, V. M ¨uller, and A. Peris , Ergodic and dynamical properties of m- isometries, Linear Algebra Appl., 561 (2019), pp. 98–112. [14] , Ces` aro bounded operators on Banach spaces , J. Anal. Math., (2020)

    2019

  8. [15]

    Berm ´udez, A

    T. Berm ´udez, A. Martin ´on, and E. Negr ´ın, Weighted shift operators which are m-isometries, Integral Equations Operator Theory, 68 (2010), pp. 301–312. 42 L. Abadias, G. Bello, and D. Yakubovich

    2010

  9. [16]

    Berm ´udez, A

    T. Berm ´udez, A. Saddi, and H. Zaw ay , ( A, m )-isometries on Hilbert spaces , Linear Algebra Appl., 540 (2018), pp. 95–111

    2018

  10. [17]

    Bickel, M

    K. Bickel, M. Hartz, and J. McCarthy , A multiplier algebra functional calculus , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 370 (2018), pp. 8467–8482

    2018

  11. [18]

    Carleson , Sets of uniqueness for functions regular in the unit circle , Acta Math., 87 (1952), pp

    L. Carleson , Sets of uniqueness for functions regular in the unit circle , Acta Math., 87 (1952), pp. 325– 345

    1952

  12. [19]

    Carlsson , On the index of invariant subspaces in Hilbert spaces of vect or-valued analytic functions , J

    M. Carlsson , On the index of invariant subspaces in Hilbert spaces of vect or-valued analytic functions , J. Math. Anal. Appl., 354 (2009), pp. 184–201

    2009

  13. [20]

    Chavan and V

    S. Chavan and V. M. Sholapurkar , Completely hyperexpansive tuples of finite order , J. Math. Anal. Appl., 447 (2017), pp. 1009–1026

    2017

  14. [22]

    Clou ˆatre, M

    R. Clou ˆatre, M. Hartz, and D. Schillo , A Beurling-Lax-Halmos theorem for spaces with a complete Nevanlinna-Pick factor , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 148 (2020), pp. 731–740

    2020

  15. [23]

    Cohen, C

    G. Cohen, C. Cuny, T. Eisner, and M. Lin , Resolvent conditions and growth of powers of operators , J. Math. Anal. Appl., 487 (2020), p. 124035

    2020

  16. [24]

    L. W. Cohen , On the mean ergodic theorem , Ann. of Math. (2), 41 (1940), pp. 505–509

    1940

  17. [25]

    Derriennic, On the mean ergodic theorem for Ces` aro bounded operators, vol

    Y. Derriennic, On the mean ergodic theorem for Ces` aro bounded operators, vol. 84/85, 2000, pp. 443–455. Dedicated to the memory of Anzelm Iwanik

    2000

  18. [26]

    R. G. Douglas, G. Misra, and J. Sarkar , Contractive Hilbert modules and their dilations , Israel J. Math., 187 (2012), pp. 141–165

    2012

  19. [27]

    Ed-dari , On the (C, α ) uniform ergodic theorem , Studia Math., 156 (2003), pp

    E. Ed-dari , On the (C, α ) uniform ergodic theorem , Studia Math., 156 (2003), pp. 3–13

    2003

  20. [28]

    , On the (C, α ) Ces` aro bounded operators, Studia Math., 161 (2004), pp. 163–175

    2004

  21. [30]

    ´Emilion, Mean-bounded operators and mean ergodic theorems , J

    R. ´Emilion, Mean-bounded operators and mean ergodic theorems , J. Funct. Anal., 61 (1985), pp. 1–14

    1985

  22. [31]

    Eschmeier, Bergman inner functions and m-hypercontractions, J

    J. Eschmeier, Bergman inner functions and m-hypercontractions, J. Funct. Anal., 275 (2018), pp. 73–102

    2018

  23. [32]

    Eschmeier and S

    J. Eschmeier and S. Toth , k-inner functions and k-contractions, Preprint, arXiv:1912.09186

    1912 arXiv

  24. [33]

    Gautschi , Some elementary inequalities relating to the Gamma and inco mplete Gamma function , J

    W. Gautschi , Some elementary inequalities relating to the Gamma and inco mplete Gamma function , J. Math. and Phys., 38 (1959/60), pp. 77–81

    1959

  25. [34]

    Grosse-Erdmann and A

    K.-G. Grosse-Erdmann and A. Peris Manguillot , Linear chaos , Universitext, Springer, London, 2011

    2011

  26. [35]

    Gu , Elementary operators which are m-isometries, Linear Algebra Appl., 451 (2014), pp

    C. Gu , Elementary operators which are m-isometries, Linear Algebra Appl., 451 (2014), pp. 49–64

    2014

  27. [36]

    , On (m, p )-expansive and (m, p )-contractive operators on Hilbert and Banach spaces , J. Math. Anal. Appl., 426 (2015), pp. 893–916

    2015

  28. [37]

    Korean Math

    , Examples of m-isometric tuples of operators on a Hilbert space , J. Korean Math. Soc., 55 (2018), pp. 225–251

    2018

  29. [38]

    P. R. Halmos , A Hilbert space problem book , vol. 19 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag , New York-Berlin, second ed., 1982. Encyclopedia of Mathema tics and its Applications, 17

    1982

  30. [39]

    G. H. Hardy and J. E. Littlewood , Some properties of fractional integrals. II , Math. Z., 34 (1932), pp. 403–439

    1932

  31. [40]

    Hille , Remarks on ergodic theorems , Trans

    E. Hille , Remarks on ergodic theorems , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 57 (1945), pp. 246–269

    1945

  32. [41]

    Y.-C. Li, R. Sato, and S.-Y. Shaw , Boundedness and growth orders of means of discrete and conti nuous semigroups of operators , Studia Math., 187 (2008), pp. 1–35. Operator Inequalities, Functional Models and Ergodicity 43

    2008

  33. [42]

    Luo and B

    L. Luo and B. Hou , Some remarks on distributional chaos for bounded linear ope rators, Turkish J. Math., 39 (2015), pp. 251–258

    2015

  34. [43]

    Majdak, M

    W. Majdak, M. Mbekhta, and L. Suciu , Operators intertwining with isometries and Brownian parts of 2-isometries , Linear Algebra Appl., 509 (2016), pp. 168–190

    2016

  35. [44]

    Montes-Rodr´ıguez, J

    A. Montes-Rodr´ıguez, J. S´anchez- ´Al varez, and J. Zem´anek, Uniform Abel-Kreiss boundedness and the extremal behaviour of the Volterra operator , Proc. London Math. Soc. (3), 91 (2005), pp. 761–788

    2005

  36. [45]

    M ¨uller, Models for operators using weighted shifts , J

    V. M ¨uller, Models for operators using weighted shifts , J. Operator Theory, 20 (1988), pp. 3–20

    1988

  37. [46]

    M ¨uller and F.-H

    V. M ¨uller and F.-H. V asilescu , Standard models for some commuting multioperators , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 117 (1993), pp. 979–989

    1993

  38. [47]

    N. K. Nikol’ski˘ı, Spectral synthesis for the shift operator, and zeros in cert ain classes of analytic functions that are smooth up to the boundary , Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 190 (1970, English transl. in Soviet Math. Dokl. 11 (1970), 206–209), pp. 780–783

    1970

  39. [48]

    Olofsson, Wandering subspace theorems, Integral Equations Operator Theory, 51 (2005), pp

    A. Olofsson, Wandering subspace theorems, Integral Equations Operator Theory, 51 (2005), pp. 395–40 9

    2005

  40. [49]

    Petersburg Mathematical Jour- nal, 19 (2008), pp

    , Operator-valued Bergman inner functions as transfer funct ions, St. Petersburg Mathematical Jour- nal, 19 (2008), pp. 603–623

    2008

  41. [50]

    Operator Theory, 74 (2015), pp

    , Parts of adjoint weighted shifts , J. Operator Theory, 74 (2015), pp. 249–280

    2015

  42. [51]

    P au and J

    J. P au and J. A. Pel ´aez, On the zeros of functions in Dirichlet-type spaces , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 363 (2011), pp. 1981–2002

    2011

  43. [52]

    Pott, Standard models under polynomial positivity conditions , J

    S. Pott, Standard models under polynomial positivity conditions , J. Operator Theory, 41 (1999), pp. 365– 389

    1999

  44. [53]

    Richter , Invariant subspaces in Banach spaces of analytic functions , Trans

    S. Richter , Invariant subspaces in Banach spaces of analytic functions , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 304 (1987), pp. 585–616

    1987

  45. [54]

    Rudin , Functional analysis , McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York-D¨ usseldorf-Johannesbur g, 1973

    W. Rudin , Functional analysis , McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York-D¨ usseldorf-Johannesbur g, 1973. McGraw-Hill Series in Higher Mathematics

    1973

  46. [55]

    Rydhe, Cyclic m-isometries and Dirichlet type spaces , J

    E. Rydhe, Cyclic m-isometries and Dirichlet type spaces , J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2), 99 (2019), pp. 733–756

    2019

  47. [56]

    Sarkar , An invariant subspace theorem and invariant subspaces of an alytic reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces

    J. Sarkar , An invariant subspace theorem and invariant subspaces of an alytic reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces. I, J. Operator Theory, 73 (2015), pp. 433–441

    2015

  48. [57]

    , An invariant subspace theorem and invariant subspaces of an alytic reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces—II , Complex Anal. Oper. Theory, 10 (2016), pp. 769–782

    2016

  49. [58]

    D. Schillo , K-contractions, and perturbations of Toeplitz operators , PhD Thesis, Saarland University, 2018, Available at https://www.math.uni-sb.de/ag/eschm eier/lehre/examen/SchilloDr.pdf

    2018

  50. [59]

    Seco , A characterization of Dirichlet-inner functions , Complex Anal

    D. Seco , A characterization of Dirichlet-inner functions , Complex Anal. Oper. Theory, 13 (2019), pp. 1653–1659

    2019

  51. [60]

    A. L. Shields , Weighted shift operators and analytic function theory , in Topics in operator theory, 1974, pp. 49–128. Math. Surveys, No. 13

    1974

  52. [61]

    Stankus , m-isometries, n-symmetries and other linear transformations which are her editary roots, Integral Equations Operator Theory, 75 (2013), pp

    M. Stankus , m-isometries, n-symmetries and other linear transformations which are her editary roots, Integral Equations Operator Theory, 75 (2013), pp. 301–321

    2013

  53. [62]

    Sz.-Nagy, C

    B. Sz.-Nagy, C. Foias, H. Bercovici, and L. K ´erchy, Harmonic analysis of operators on Hilbert space, Universitext, Springer, New York, second ed., 2010

    2010

  54. [63]

    F. G. Tricomi and A. Erd ´elyi, The asymptotic expansion of a ratio of gamma functions , Pacific J. Math., 1 (1951), pp. 133–142

    1951

  55. [64]

    Zygmund , Trigonometric series

    A. Zygmund , Trigonometric series. 2nd ed. Vols. I, II , Cambridge University Press, New York, 1959. 44 L. Abadias, G. Bello, and D. Yakubovich Luciano Abadias Departamento de Matem ´aticas, Instituto Universitario de Matem ´aticas y Aplicaciones, Universidad de Zaragoza, 5000...

    1959

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.