Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Spectrophotometric templates for core collapse supernovae and their application in simulations of time-domain surveys

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper builds a fully data-driven library of 67 core-collapse supernova spectral templates, extended into the near-UV, that reproduces observed photometry to about 0.02 mag in the optical and 0.1 mag in the near-UV, and uses it to…

desk verdict Useful library of 67 core-collapse SN templates with real code, but the 'fully data-driven' label and the in-sample UV validation are weaker than the abstract implies. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.05228 v1 pith:OJ7M7466 submitted 2019-08-13 astro-ph.HE

M. Vincenzi , M. Sullivan , R. E. Firth , C. P. Gutiérrez , C. Frohmaier , M. Smith , C. Angus , R. C. Nichol This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords core-collapsesupernovaespectraltemplatesGaussianprocessesnear-ultravioletphotometrytime-domainsurveyssupernovacontaminationluminosityfunctionsphotometricclassification
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to supply the missing ingredient for simulating realistic populations of core-collapse supernovae in time-domain surveys: a library of spectral time-series templates built event by event from real data, with no assumed light-curve model. Using 67 published core-collapse supernovae, the authors construct daily-sampled, rest-frame templates extended into the near-UV to about 1600 \AA{}, with an optional correction for host-galaxy dust. They claim the templates recover the observed photometry to within 0.02 mag in the optical and about 0.1 mag in the near-UV, and that the library, combined with luminosity functions and relative rates, can simulate core-collapse contamination in photometric type Ia samples out to $z\sim1$. They demonstrate this by repeating a published photometric SN Ia contamination analysis with the new templates and three different luminosity-function choices, finding that the predicted contamination level depends strongly on the assumed luminosity functions and extinction treatment. The template-building code is open-source and generalisable to any transient with well-sampled photometry and multiple spectra.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the two-dimensional Gaussian-process flux surface $f(t,\lambda)$, built by combining flux-calibrated spectra and broad-band photometry (including satellite UV filters) on a 60 \AA{} wavelength grid. A Matern 3/2 kernel with fixed length scales $\sigma_\lambda = 100\,$\AA{} and $\sigma_t = 30$ days interpolates the surface, and the GP mean is a sub-class average colour surface multiplied by the event's own V-band light curve. This one surface performs three jobs: it extends the optical spectra into the near-UV, it interpolates between sparsely sampled spectra, and it lets the code extrapolate additional daily spectra, which are then remangled so that synthetic and observed photometry agree in every filter.

What would settle it

Take a well-observed stripped-envelope event, rebuild its template with the near-UV photometry withheld, and compare the near-UV light curve predicted by the GP surface with the actual satellite UV measurements; if the withheld fluxes deviate systematically by more than about 0.1 mag across several events, the claim that the UV extension is faithful fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a spectral template for a core-collapse supernova can be built entirely from its own multi-band photometry and sparse spectroscopy, with no parametric light-curve or SED model. Each event becomes its own template: Gaussian processes interpolate each light curve, a mangling step flux-calibrates each observed spectrum against the interpolated photometry, and a two-dimensional Gaussian process over time and wavelength combines spectra with near-UV photometry into a continuous flux surface $f(t,\lambda)$. Re-sampling that surface daily and remangling against photometry yields a spectral time series that reproduces the observed colours. The paper claims this near-UV-extended, event-by-event library preserves the diversity of core-collapse supernovae and is accurate enough for simulations of photometric surveys to $z\approx1$.

Load-bearing premise

The near-UV extension of every template leans on a sub-class average colour prior with fixed smoothing scales, so an event whose ultraviolet behaviour is genuinely unusual is pulled toward the average and its true UV diversity may be lost.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The library plugs directly into existing supernova simulation pipelines, so photometric SN Ia analyses can generate core-collapse contamination with event-level spectral diversity rather than a handful of averaged templates.
  • At redshifts above about 0.4, the near-UV extension roughly doubles the predicted core-collapse contamination compared with optical-only templates, making the UV coverage essential for high-redshift contamination estimates.
  • Luminosity functions tuned against one template library do not transfer cleanly to another; the paper's repeats give contamination fractions of 3.7, 9.5, and 7.5 per cent depending on the luminosity function and extinction treatment.
  • Host-extinction-corrected templates combined with simulated dust overproduce bright contaminants by about a factor of three, indicating that the extinction model or luminosity function needs revisiting.
  • Because the code is open-source and data-driven, the library can be extended to any future transient with well-sampled photometry and multiple spectra, growing the diversity coverage of the sample.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural stress test not performed in the paper is a true out-of-sample UV validation: withhold the near-UV photometry from the GP surface for several well-observed events and compare the predicted UV light curves with the measured ones; the fixed prior would be expected to mask genuine UV outliers.
  • The fixed GP length scales encode an assumption that the flux surface is smooth on 100 \AA{} and 30-day scales; transients with fast UV spectral evolution (early shock breakout or flash ionisation) may be smoothed over, which is a testable limitation when applying the code to other transients.
  • The selection criteria (UV photometry, at least five spectra, pre-peak coverage) bias the library against faint or highly reddened events, and the paper notes its stripped-envelope templates have lower median host reddening than published samples; the claimed diversity is therefore the diversity of well-observed, relatively unobscured events.
  • The UV extension is anchored by photometry rather than by a physical UV line-blanketing model, so at high redshift the simulated rest-frame UV colours inherit whatever the GP surface does between anchors; comparing simulated high-z colours with observed rest-frame UV colours of the same events would quantify that systematic.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a library of 67 rest-frame, daily-sampled spectral time-series templates for core-collapse supernovae, using literature photometry and spectroscopy. Light curves are interpolated with Gaussian processes, observed spectra are flux-calibrated by mangling to the photometry, and the wavelength coverage is extended into the near-UV with a two-dimensional GP interpolation that uses a sub-class average colour prior. Templates are optionally corrected for host-galaxy extinction and are provided in a form suitable for use with snana. The library is applied to simulate core-collapse contamination in a PS1-like photometric SN Ia sample, comparing three luminosity-function choices, and the results are compared with the observed Hubble-residual distribution.

Significance. If the validation caveats are addressed, this is a valuable community resource: it provides a larger, event-by-event template library than existing alternatives, retains object-to-object diversity, extends into the near-UV, and is released as open-source code with an example snana integration. The simulation application is an independent use of the templates in the sense that they are not tuned to the PS1 contamination data, and the paper honestly reports that the standard luminosity functions underproduce the observed contamination. The main scientific value lies in enabling more realistic simulations for photometric classification and SN Ia cosmology, but the headline claims about near-UV fidelity and usefulness up to z~1 currently rest on in-sample validation.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.2.1] The near-UV extension is validated only in-sample. The prior for the two-dimensional GP is a sub-class average colour surface built from the same 67 SNe, with fixed length scales sigma_lambda=100 Å and sigma_t=30 days; for events with sparse UV photometry the posterior is pulled toward this sub-class average, so the library is likely to under-represent true UV diversity. The test described in §2.2.1 uses only SN 2013by and iPTF13bvn and does not quantify shrinkage for the remaining majority of events. Since §4.3 and Fig. 9 show that using the near-UV-extended templates changes the predicted contamination by a factor of two at z>0.4, the suitability claim up to z~1 should be qualified until the UV extension is tested on held-out events or through a cross-validation scheme.
  2. [§3.2 / Fig. 7] The quoted photometric recovery of 0.02 mag in the optical and 0.1 mag in the near-UV is an in-sample test: the same extinction-corrected photometry used to construct each template, and subsequently forced to match through the remangling step in §2.2.2, is the photometry compared with the final synthetic template. This demonstrates internal consistency but not predictive accuracy on new events or on data deliberately withheld during construction. An out-of-sample test, such as leaving out a filter or an epoch during template construction and checking the residuals, would support the claimed accuracy; without it, the 0.1 mag near-UV figure should be described as a fitting residual rather than as an expected template error.
  3. [Appendix A / Fig. A2] The host-extinction corrections carry large, acknowledged systematic uncertainties—Na i D equivalent widths with large scatter, a fixed RV=3.1, and average reddening assumed for four SNe—yet the de-reddened templates are a central product used in the §4.2.1 simulations with the R14 luminosity functions. After corrections, the uvw1−V scatter of the templates remains about 0.5–0.7 mag for stripped-envelope SNe, and Fig. A4 shows that the median host reddening in the sample is factors of two to four below the Prentice et al. (2016) values for stripped-envelope types. The paper should quantify how these uncertainties propagate into the simulated contamination rates, or it should restrict the claims made for the de-reddened-template application.
  4. [Abstract and §2.1.2] The abstract and Section 5 state that the templates are built with no assumption of any parametric form or model for the light curves, but Section 2.1.2 explicitly uses the parametric power law f(t)=alpha(t-t0)^n for early phases, with n fixed to 1.5 for stripped-envelope SNe and 0.935 for hydrogen-rich SNe, and Eq. (3) adds a parametric shock-breakout component. The claim should be qualified to state that no parametric form is assumed over most of the light curve, or the early-rise parametrization should be integrated into the GP model; as written, the abstract overstates the data-driven nature of the method.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4.3] The sentence describing Fig. 10 contains a typo: 'SNe Ib ans SNe Ic' should read 'SNe Ib and SNe Ic'.
  2. [Eq. (3)] The exponential term in Eq. (3) is ambiguous; writing exp[-(t-t0)/tau] or otherwise clarifying the functional form of the shock-breakout component would improve reproducibility.
  3. [Table 2] The column header 'Numb. of Ref. Spectra Host' appears to combine the spectrum count and the reddening reference into one heading; splitting these into two clearly labelled columns would prevent confusion.
  4. [§3.1.4] The classification scheme lists six sub-types but SN 1987A is also included as a template; the text should clarify whether SN 1987A is treated as a seventh class in simulations or is assigned to one of the six classes.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Template library construction and PS1 application are largely independent, but the headline photometric-recovery check (Fig. 7) is in-sample and largely forced by the remangling calibration, so the quoted residuals are a consistency check rather than predictive validation.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 2.2.2 (remangling) and Section 3.2 / Fig. 7]
    "We then adjust the extended spectra until the synthetic and observed photometry match. ... After testing our technique on the sample of 67 SNe described in Section 3.1, we compare the published observed photometry with the photometry synthesised from the final flux-calibrated, daily-sampled and near-UV extended spectral time-series. Our results are presented in Fig. 7. On average the observed photometry is recovered to within 0.02 magnitudes in most of the optical filters and to within 0.1 magnitudes in the near-UV."

    The photometry compared in Fig. 7 is the same photometry used to construct the templates, and the remangling procedure explicitly forces synthetic fluxes to match that photometry ('adjust the extended spectra until the synthetic and observed photometry match'). The quoted 0.02 mag optical and 0.1 mag near-UV residuals are therefore a measure of how well the calibration loop closed, not an out-of-sample prediction of unseen photometry. The paper is transparent that the observed photometry is the same data used for the light-curve fitting, but the residual values are still presented as a validation metric and are largely guaranteed by construction.

full rationale

The central template-building chain (GP light-curve fits, mangling, 2D GP flux-surface interpolation, remangling) is data-driven and internally consistent; no equation in the construction reduces to a fitted parameter by definition. The near-UV prior is built from the same 67 SNe used to construct the templates, which can reduce UV diversity for sparsely observed events and deserves a caveat, but the final template is a combination of the prior and the individual SN data, not simply the prior. The PS1 contamination simulation is an external application: the templates are not tuned to the PS1 data, and the paper explicitly tests independent luminosity functions (L11, R14) as well as the J17-tuned ones, so the simulation results provide legitimate external evidence about template-library behavior. The main self-referential element is the Fig. 7 photometric recovery check, which is in-sample and strongly constrained by the remangling step; it is a useful sanity check but is presented without emphasizing that it is not a predictive test. Because the library's utility is further supported by the independent PS1 comparison and by the open-source code that can be applied to future transients, the overall circularity is modest rather than central.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central product is an empirical library; the main assumptions are the GP kernels and fixed length scales, the sample-derived color prior for UV extension, the extinction law and corrections, and the extrapolation of local luminosity functions and rates to higher redshift. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (7)
  • Light-curve GP amplitude A and scale sigma = Optimized per filter per SN via log-likelihood minimization; ~6% of light curves manually fixed
    Hyperparameters of the Matern 3/2 kernel used for Gaussian process light-curve interpolation (Section 2.1.1).
  • Mangling GP length scale = 300 A (fixed)
    Fixed scale for the Matern 3/2 kernel used to interpolate the ratio between photometric and synthetic fluxes when flux-calibrating spectra (Section 2.2).
  • 2D GP wavelength scale sigma_lambda = 100 A (fixed)
    Chosen by hand for the two-dimensional flux surface interpolation; the paper states optimizing does not affect results significantly but is computationally expensive (Section 2.2.1).
  • 2D GP time scale sigma_t = 30 days (fixed)
    Chosen by hand for the same 2D GP; not fitted to data (Section 2.2.1).
  • Early rise power-law index n = 1.5 for stripped-envelope SNe, 0.935 for hydrogen-rich SNe
    Assumed from Piro & Nakar (2013) and Gonzalez-Gaitan et al. (2015) rather than fitted; an assumption about the early light-curve shape (Section 2.1.2).
  • Explosion time t0 for SNe with uncertain explosion epoch = Fitted within bounds set by non-detections and discovery date
    Treated as a free parameter when the explosion epoch is not well measured (Section 2.1.2).
  • Host galaxy E(B-V) for four SNe without reddening estimates = Median extinction from Prentice et al. (2016), 0.081 mag
    Adopted average host extinction for SNe lacking any reddening information (Appendix A1).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Photometry has been corrected for Milky Way and host galaxy extinction using a Cardelli et al. (1989) extinction law with R_V=3.1.
    Invoked in Section 3.2 (ii); the choice of R_V is discussed in Appendix A and may not hold for all stripped-envelope SNe, which can have higher R_V.
  • ad hoc to paper The color evolution of core collapse SNe within a sub-class is similar enough that an average color surface can serve as a prior for individual events.
    Used to build the prior for the 2D GP UV extension (Section 2.2.1); this is a modeling assumption specific to the paper's method.
  • domain assumption The empirical relation E(B-V)_host = 0.16 EW(Na I D) from Turatto et al. (2003) applies to the host galaxies of the sample.
    Used to derive many of the host extinction estimates in Table 2 (Appendix A1); known to have large scatter.
  • domain assumption The relative rates and luminosity functions measured locally (Shivvers et al. 2017; Li et al. 2011; Richardson et al. 2014) apply at higher redshifts.
    Stated in Section 4.1: 'we assume these LFs and relative rates also apply at higher redshift'.
  • domain assumption The Gaussian process with Matern 3/2 kernel, constant zero mean, and interpolation-only use provides a faithful model of SN light curves and flux surfaces.
    Core to the entire method (Sections 2.1.1 and 2.2.1); GPs are physics-agnostic, so extrapolation is avoided and non-physical behavior is constrained by priors.
  • domain assumption Spectral features not associated with the SN (host galaxy lines, telluric features) can be cleanly removed by sigma-clipping.
    Data reduction step (v) in Section 3.2; if subtraction is imperfect, templates could include contamination.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spectrophotometric templates for core collapse supernovae and their application in simulations of time-domain surveys." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OJ7M7466

@misc{pith2026190805228,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spectrophotometric templates for core collapse supernovae and their application in simulations of time-domain surveys},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OJ7M7466}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.05228}
}
abstract

The design and analysis of time-domain sky surveys requires the ability to simulate accurately realistic populations of core collapse supernova (SN) events. We present a set of spectral time-series templates designed for this purpose, for both hydrogen-rich (type II, IIn, IIb) and stripped envelope (types Ib, Ic, Ic-BL) core collapse supernovae. We use photometric and spectroscopic data for 67 core collapse supernovae from the literature, and for each generate a time-series spectral template. The techniques used to build the templates are fully data-driven with no assumption of any parametric form or model for the light curves. The template-building code is open-source, and can be applied to any transient for which well-sampled multi-band photometry and multiple spectroscopic observations are available. We extend these spectral templates into the near-ultraviolet to $\lambda \lambda \sim 1600 \AA$ using observer-frame ultraviolet photometry. We also provide a set of templates corrected for host galaxy dust extinction, and provide a set of luminosity functions that can be used with our spectral templates in simulations. We give an example of how these templates can be used by integrating them within the popular SN simulation package $\textsc{snana}$, and simulating core collapse supernovae in photometrically-selected cosmological type Ia supernova samples, prone to contamination from core collapse events.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.05228 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic of the process used to build SN spectral tem￾plates from multi-band photometry and spectroscopy. The final templates are sampled daily and extended into the near-UV. The technique implemented to fit multi-band light curves is presented in Section 2.1, and the flux calibration and near-UV extension of the spectroscopic data are discussed in Section 2.2. In Section 2.3 we explain the final corrections applie… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Fit of multi-band light curves using Gaussian processes for the SN Ib iPTF13bvn. iPTF13bvn was observed in 14 filters, including five filters from Swift/UVOT. Filled dots indicate the published photometry. The cobalt decay dominated phase of each light curve is artificially over-sampled to better constrain the GP interpolation at later phases, denoted with open symbols (see Section 3.2). Solid lines show the interpo… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Mangling of the iPTF13bvn spectrum taken at MJD 56469.0. Top panel: For each filter we show the ratio between the photometric flux (estimated using the GP interpolation of the light curve at the epoch of spectral observation) and the synthetic flux from the observed spectrum. The uncertainties from the light curve GP interpolation are propagated. The smooth mangling correction function is also interpolated using GPs… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: Two dimensional surface built for the SN Ib iPTF13bvn, combining sparse flux-calibrated spectroscopy and near-UV photometry as described in Section 2.2.1. For this SN, photometry in the Swift filters u, uvw1 and uvw2 is available. In this graphical representation…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Near-UV extension of spectrophotometric observations for the SN Ib iPTF13bvn. Each flux-calibrated spectrum (black) is extended using near-UV light curves and the two-dimensional interpolation technique presented in Section 2.2.1. The near-UV extended spectra are shown…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Synthetic multi-band photometry estimated using the SN template built from the SN Ib iPTF13bvn. The photometry is synthesised in the LSST filter system, with the SN event simulated at z = 0.2 (left panel) and z = 0.5 (right panel). Filled symbols indicate photometric p…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Observed photometry compared to photometry synthesised from the final templates of the 67 SNe in our sample. The observed photometry is the published photometry corrected for Milky Way and host dust extinction, and it is the same used to perform the light curve fitting…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Upper panels: The Hubble residuals predicted i) using our library of core collapse templates generated without extinction corrections together with the revised L11 luminosity functions (left), ii) using our library of extinction-corrected templates and the R14 luminosi…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Ratio between the number of simulated SNe and number of observed SNe in each Hubble residual bins for three different redshift intervals: z < 0.3 (left, 368 SNe observed), 0.3 < z < 0.4 (centre, 368 SNe observed), and z > 0.4 (right, 417 SNe observed). Upper figure: We…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Stacked distributions of simulated Hubble residuals for different core collapse SN types showing the relative importance of each SN type as a contaminant. The four panels show the results for the three simulations tested in this paper (Section 4.2.1) plus the J17 simu…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Simulation Based Inference Approach to Modelling of Type Ia Supernova Populations

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A simulation-based inference pipeline (Stjörnumál) fits SN Ia dust and intrinsic scatter models to DES 5-year data, enabling fast Bayesian model comparison across seven SN Ia population models.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

219 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    W., O'Neil M., 2015, @doi [IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence] 10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2448083 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ITPAM..38..252A 38

    Ambikasaran S., Foreman-Mackey D., Greengard L., Hogg D. W., O'Neil M., 2015, @doi [IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence] 10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2448083 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ITPAM..38..252A 38

    arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    P., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/67 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2014ApJ...786...67A 786, 67

    Anderson J. P., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/786/1/67 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2014ApJ...786...67A 786, 67

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/786/1/67 2014

  3. [3]

    P., et al., 2018, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-018-0458-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018NatAs...2..574A 2, 574

    Anderson J. P., et al., 2018, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-018-0458-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018NatAs...2..574A 2, 574

    doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0458-4 2018

  4. [4]

    R., et al., 2018, arXiv e-prints, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018arXiv181204071A

    Angus C. R., et al., 2018, arXiv e-prints, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018arXiv181204071A

    2018

  5. [5]

    Arcavi I., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/742/2/L18 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...742L..18A 742, L18

    doi:10.1088/2041-8205/742/2/l18 2011

  6. [6]

    Arcavi I., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/756/2/L30 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2012ApJ...756L..30A 756, L30

    doi:10.1088/2041-8205/756/2/l30 2012

  7. [7]

    Arcavi I., et al., 2017a, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature24030 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017Natur.551..210A 551, 210

    doi:10.1038/nature24030

  8. [8]

    Arcavi I., et al., 2017b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa5be1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2017ApJ...837L...2A 837, L2

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa5be1

Show all 219 references
  1. [9]

    Astier P., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20054185 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A

    2006 doi

  2. [10]

    Astropy Collaboration et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    arXiv:1901.09962

    Azalee Bostroem K., et al., 2019, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2019arXiv190109962A p. arXiv:1901.09962

    2019 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Barbary K., et al., 2016, SNCosmo: Python library for supernova cosmology , Astrophysics Source Code Library ( @eprint ascl 1611.017 )

    2016

  5. [13]

    Barbon R., Ciatti F., Rosino L., 1979, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979A

    1979

  6. [14]

    Barbon R., Benetti S., Cappellaro E., Rosino L., Turatto M., 1990, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990A 79

    1990

  7. [15]

    Barbon R., Benetti S., Cappellaro E., Patat F., Turatto M., Iijima T., 1995, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995A

    1995

  8. [16]

    H., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/517961 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2007ApJ...662.1148B 662, 1148

    Baron E., Branch D., Hauschildt P. H., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/517961 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2007ApJ...662.1148B 662, 1148

    2007 doi

  9. [17]

    J., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/764/1/L13 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...764L..13B 764, L13

    Bayless A. J., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/764/1/L13 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...764L..13B 764, L13

    2013 doi

  10. [18]

    Bazin G., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200911847 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A

    2009 doi

  11. [19]

    Ben-Ami S., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/760/2/L33 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...760L..33B 760, L33

    2012 doi

  12. [20]

    Ben-Ami S., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/803/1/40 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...803...40B 803, 40

    2015 doi

  13. [22]

    C., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature25151 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018Natur.554..497B 554, 497

    Bersten M. C., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature25151 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018Natur.554..497B 554, 497

    2018 doi

  14. [23]

    Betoule M., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423413 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A

    2014 doi

  15. [24]

    B., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/213/2/19 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJS..213...19B 213, 19

    Bianco F. B., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/213/2/19 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJS..213...19B 213, 19

    2014 doi

  16. [25]

    S., Milisavljevic D., Margutti R., Fesen R

    Black C. S., Milisavljevic D., Margutti R., Fesen R. A., Patnaude D., Parker S., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8999 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...848....5B 848, 5

    2017 doi

  17. [26]

    Bose S., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt864 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433.1871B 433, 1871

    2013 doi

  18. [27]

    Bose S., et al., 2015a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv759 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.450.2373B 450, 2373

    doi

  19. [28]

    Bose S., et al., 2015b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/160 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...806..160B 806, 160

    doi

  20. [29]

    Bose S., Kumar B., Misra K., Matsumoto K., Kumar B., Singh M., Fukushima D., Kawabata M., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2351 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.455.2712B 455, 2712

    2016 doi

  21. [30]

    J., Breeveld A

    Brown P. J., Breeveld A. A., Holland S., Kuin P., Pritchard T., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s10509-014-2059-8 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014Ap

    2014 doi

  22. [31]

    J., Roming P

    Brown P. J., Roming P. W. A., Milne P. A., 2015, @doi [Journal of High Energy Astrophysics] 10.1016/j.jheap.2015.04.007 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2015JHEAp...7..111B 7, 111

    2015 doi

  23. [32]

    J., Breeveld A., Roming P

    Brown P. J., Breeveld A., Roming P. W. A., Siegel M., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/152/4/102 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....152..102B 152, 102

    2016 doi

  24. [33]

    Bufano F., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/1456 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2009ApJ...700.1456B 700, 1456

    2009 doi

  25. [34]

    Bufano F., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu065 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.439.1807B 439, 1807

    2014 doi

  26. [35]

    Bullivant C., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty045 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.476.1497B 476, 1497

    2018 doi

  27. [36]

    Buton C., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219834 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2013AA...549A...8B 549, A8

    2013 doi

  28. [37]

    Campbell H., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/763/2/88 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...763...88C 763, 88

    2013 doi

  29. [38]

    Cao Y., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/L7 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...775L...7C 775, L7

    2013 doi

  30. [39]

    A., Clayton G

    Cardelli J. A., Clayton G. C., Mathis J. S., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1086/167900 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989ApJ...345..245C 345, 245

    1989 doi

  31. [40]

    M., et al., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/229.1.15P , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987MNRAS.229P..15C 229, 15P

    Catchpole R. M., et al., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/229.1.15P , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987MNRAS.229P..15C 229, 15P

    1987 doi

  32. [41]

    M., et al., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/231.1.75P , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988MNRAS.231P..75C 231, 75p

    Catchpole R. M., et al., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/231.1.75P , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988MNRAS.231P..75C 231, 75p

    1988 doi

  33. [42]

    M., et al., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/237.1.55P , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989MNRAS.237P..55C 237, 55P

    Catchpole R. M., et al., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/237.1.55P , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989MNRAS.237P..55C 237, 55P

    1989 doi

  34. [43]

    Chen J., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/790/2/120 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...790..120C 790, 120

    2014 doi

  35. [44]

    J., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2016.47 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016PASA...33...55C 33, e055

    Childress M. J., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1017/pasa.2016.47 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016PASA...33...55C 33, e055

    2016 doi

  36. [45]

    Chornock R., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/162 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...767..162C 767, 162

    2013 doi

  37. [46]

    N., 1990, Soviet Astronomy Letters, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990SvAL...16..457C 16, 457

    Chugai N. N., 1990, Soviet Astronomy Letters, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990SvAL...16..457C 16, 457

    1990

  38. [47]

    C., Brotherton M

    Clocchiatti A., Wheeler J. C., Brotherton M. S., Cochran A. L., Wills D., Barker E. S., Turatto M., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177165 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...462..462C 462, 462

    1996 doi

  39. [48]

    Conley A., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/588518 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...681..482C 681, 482

    2008 doi

  40. [49]

    Dall'Ora M., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/787/2/139 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...787..139D 787, 139

    2014 doi

  41. [50]

    Dhungana G., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/6 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...822....6D 822, 6

    2016 doi

  42. [51]

    R., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/97 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...741...97D 741, 97

    Drout M. R., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/97 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...741...97D 741, 97

    2011 doi

  43. [52]

    R., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/57 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...821...57D 821, 57

    Drout M. R., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/57 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...821...57D 821, 57

    2016 doi

  44. [53]

    Elias-Rosa N., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/714/2/L254 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2010ApJ...714L.254E 714, L254

    2010 doi

  45. [54]

    Ergon M., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321850 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A

    2014 doi

  46. [55]

    Faran T., et al., 2014a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu955 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.442..844F 442, 844

    doi

  47. [56]

    Faran T., et al., 2014b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1760 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445..554F 445, 554

    doi

  48. [57]

    P., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12353.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.384..449F 384, 449

    Feroz F., Hobson M. P., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12353.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.384..449F 384, 449

    2008

  49. [59]

    V., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.309 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ARA

    Filippenko A. V., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.309 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ARA

    1997 doi

  50. [60]

    V., Matheson T., Ho L

    Filippenko A. V., Matheson T., Ho L. C., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/187043 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...415L.103F 415, L103

    1993 doi

  51. [61]

    V., et al., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309659 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...450L..11F 450, L11

    Filippenko A. V., et al., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/309659 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...450L..11F 450, L11

    1995 doi

  52. [62]

    Folatelli G., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/500531 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2006ApJ...641.1039F 641, 1039

    2006 doi

  53. [63]

    J., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/378242 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PASP..115.1220F 115, 1220

    Foley R. J., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/378242 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PASP..115.1220F 115, 1220

    2003 doi

  54. [64]

    Fraser M., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt813 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433.1312F 433, 1312

    2013 doi

  55. [65]

    Fremling C., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423884 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A

    2014 doi

  56. [66]

    Fremling C., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628275 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A

    2016 doi

  57. [67]

    Gal-Yam A., 2016, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016arXiv161109353G ( @eprint arXiv 1611.09353 )

    2016 arXiv

  58. [68]

    O., Shemmer O., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05535.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.332L..73G 332, L73

    Gal-Yam A., Ofek E. O., Shemmer O., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05535.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.332L..73G 332, L73

    2002

  59. [69]

    Gal-Yam A., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/592744 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...685L.117G 685, L117

    2008 doi

  60. [70]

    J., et al., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1038/27150 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998Natur.395..670G 395, 670

    Galama T. J., et al., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1038/27150 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998Natur.395..670G 395, 670

    1998 doi

  61. [71]

    Galbany L., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/151/2/33 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....151...33G 151, 33

    2016 doi

  62. [72]

    Gong Y., Cooray A., Chen X., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/709/2/1420 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...709.1420G 709, 1420

    2010 doi

  63. [73]

    Gonz \'a lez-Gait \'a n S., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1097 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.451.2212G 451, 2212

    2015 doi

  64. [74]

    L., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/787/2/163 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...787..163G 787, 163

    Graham M. L., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/787/2/163 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...787..163G 787, 163

    2014 doi

  65. [75]

    Z., Margutti R., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/64 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...835...64G 835, 64

    Guillochon J., Parrent J., Kelley L. Z., Margutti R., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/64 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...835...64G 835, 64

    2017 doi

  66. [76]

    P., et al., 2017a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8f52 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...850...89G 850, 89

    Guti \'e rrez C. P., et al., 2017a, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8f52 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...850...89G 850, 89

    doi

  67. [77]

    P., et al., 2017b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8f42 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...850...90G 850, 90

    Guti \'e rrez C. P., et al., 2017b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8f42 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...850...90G 850, 90

    doi

  68. [78]

    Guy J., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066930 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A

    2007 doi

  69. [79]

    Guy J., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014468 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A

    2010 doi

  70. [80]

    Hamuy M., et al., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/322450 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...558..615H 558, 615

    2001 doi

  71. [81]

    H., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20078859 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A

    Harutyunyan A. H., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20078859 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A

    2008 doi

  72. [82]

    Hatano K., Branch D., Deaton J., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305903 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/1998ApJ...502..177H 502, 177

    1998 doi

  73. [83]

    Hicken M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/aa8ef4 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJS..233....6H 233, 6

    2017 doi

  74. [84]

    Hlozek R., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/752/2/79 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...752...79H 752, 79

    2012 doi

  75. [85]

    Hosseinzadeh G., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aac5f6 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...861...63H 861, 63

    2018 doi

  76. [86]

    Y., Conley A., Howell D

    Hsiao E. Y., Conley A., Howell D. A., Sullivan M., Pritchet C. J., Carlberg R. G., Nugent P. E., Phillips M. M., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/518232 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...663.1187H 663, 1187

    2007 doi

  77. [87]

    Huang F., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty066 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2018MNRAS.475.3959H 475, 3959

    2018 doi

  78. [88]

    M., Davidson K., Jones T

    Humphreys R. M., Davidson K., Jones T. J., Pogge R. W., Grammer S. H., Prieto J. L., Pritchard T. A., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/93 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...760...93H 760, 93

    2012 doi

  79. [89]

    J., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912896 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2009A&A...508..371H 508, 371

    Hunter D. J., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200912896 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2009A&A...508..371H 508, 371

    2009 doi

  80. [92]

    Inserra C., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220496 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    2013 doi

  81. [93]

    P., Angus C., Smith M., Sullivan M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaaaaa , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...854..175I 854, 175

    Inserra C., Prajs S., Gutierrez C. P., Angus C., Smith M., Sullivan M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaaaaa , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...854..175I 854, 175

    2018 doi

  82. [94]

    Ishida E. E. O., de Souza R. S., 2012, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012arXiv1201.6676I ( @eprint arXiv 1201.6676 )

    2012 arXiv

  83. [95]

    Izzo L., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1038/s41586-018-0826-3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019Natur.565..324I 565, 324

    2019 doi

  84. [96]

    O., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa767b , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...843....6J 843, 6

    Jones D. O., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa767b , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...843....6J 843, 6

    2017 doi

  85. [97]

    O., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab6b1 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...857...51J 857, 51

    Jones D. O., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab6b1 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...857...51J 857, 51

    2018 doi

  86. [98]

    V., Feroz F., Hobson M

    Karpenka N. V., Feroz F., Hobson M. P., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts412 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.429.1278K 429, 1278

    2013 doi

  87. [99]

    Kessler R., Scolnic D., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/56 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...836...56K 836, 56

    2017 doi

  88. [100]

    Kessler R., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1086/605984 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009PASP..121.1028K 121, 1028

    2009 doi

  89. [101]

    arXiv:1001.5210

    Kessler R., Conley A., Jha S., Kuhlmann S., 2010a, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2010arXiv1001.5210K p. arXiv:1001.5210

    arXiv

  90. [102]

    Kessler R., et al., 2010b, @doi [Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific] 10.1086/657607 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2010PASP..122.1415K 122, 1415

    doi

  91. [103]

    Khazov D., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/818/1/3 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...818....3K 818, 3

    2016 doi

  92. [104]

    G., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/766/2/84 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...766...84K 766, 84

    Kim A. G., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/766/2/84 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...766...84K 766, 84

    2013 doi

  93. [105]

    Krisciunas K., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/137/1/34 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2009AJ....137...34K 137, 34

    2009 doi

  94. [106]

    Kumar B., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt162 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.431..308K 431, 308

    2013 doi

  95. [107]

    A., Hlozek R

    Kunz M., Bassett B. A., Hlozek R. A., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.103508 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007PhRvD..75j3508K 75, 103508

    2007 doi

  96. [108]

    V., Connolly B

    Kuznetsova N. V., Connolly B. M., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/511814 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...659..530K 659, 530

    2007 doi

  97. [109]

    U., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/116242 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992AJ....104..340L 104, 340

    Landolt A. U., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/116242 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992AJ....104..340L 104, 340

    1992 doi

  98. [111]

    A., Cadonau R., Cerrito D., 1991, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991A

    Leibundgut B., Tammann G. A., Cadonau R., Cerrito D., 1991, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991A

    1991

  99. [112]

    C., et al., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/324785 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002PASP..114...35L 114, 35

    Leonard D. C., et al., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/324785 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002PASP..114...35L 114, 35

    2002 doi

  100. [113]

    V., Chornock R., Jha S., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/376432 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PASP..115..844L 115, 844

    Li W., Filippenko A. V., Chornock R., Jha S., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/376432 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003PASP..115..844L 115, 844

    2003 doi

  101. [115]

    D., Peiris H

    Lochner M., McEwen J. D., Peiris H. V., Lahav O., Winter M. K., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0067-0049/225/2/31 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJS..225...31L 225, 31

    2016 doi

  102. [116]

    Maguire K., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16332.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.404..981M 404, 981

    2010

  103. [117]

    Margutti R., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/780/1/21 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...780...21M 780, 21

    2014 doi

  104. [118]

    B., 2009, in Bohlender D

    Markwardt C. B., 2009, in Bohlender D. A., Durand D., Dowler P., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 411, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVIII. p. 251 ( @eprint arXiv 0902.2850 )

    2009 arXiv

  105. [119]

    Matheson T., et al., 2000a, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301518 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....120.1487M 120, 1487

    doi

  106. [120]

    V., Ho L

    Matheson T., Filippenko A. V., Ho L. C., Barth A. J., Leonard D. C., 2000b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/301519 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....120.1499M 120, 1499

    doi

  107. [121]

    C., et al., 2013a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt009 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.430.1801M 430, 1801

    Mauerhan J. C., et al., 2013a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt009 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.430.1801M 430, 1801

    doi

  108. [122]

    C., et al., 2013b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt360 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.431.2599M 431, 2599

    Mauerhan J. C., et al., 2013b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt360 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.431.2599M 431, 2599

    doi

  109. [123]

    A., et al., 2008, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1158088 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008Sci...321.1185M 321, 1185

    Mazzali P. A., et al., 2008, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1158088 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008Sci...321.1185M 321, 1185

    2008 doi

  110. [124]

    arXiv:1811.11771

    Meza N., et al., 2018, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2018arXiv181111771M p. arXiv:1811.11771

    2018 arXiv

  111. [125]

    Milisavljevic D., Fesen R., Nordsieck K., Pickering T., Gulbis A., O'Donoghue D., 2011, Central Bureau Electronic Telegrams, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011CBET.2777....3M 2777, 3

    2011

  112. [126]

    Milisavljevic D., et al., 2013a, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/71 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...767...71M 767, 71

    doi

  113. [127]

    Milisavljevic D., et al., 2013b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/770/2/L38 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2013ApJ...770L..38M 770, L38

    doi

  114. [128]

    Milisavljevic D., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/51 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...799...51M 799, 51

    2015 doi

  115. [129]

    Modjaz M., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/505906 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006ApJ...645L..21M 645, L21

    2006 doi

  116. [130]

    P., Blondin S., Challis P., Matheson T., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/593135 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...687L...9M 687, L9

    Modjaz M., Kirshner R. P., Blondin S., Challis P., Matheson T., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/593135 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...687L...9M 687, L9

    2008 doi

  117. [131]

    Modjaz M., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/702/1/226 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...702..226M 702, 226

    2009 doi

  118. [132]

    Modjaz M., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/147/5/99 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AJ....147...99M 147, 99

    2014 doi

  119. [133]

    arXiv:1901.06384

    M \"o ller A., de Boissi \`e re T., 2019, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2019arXiv190106384M p. arXiv:1901.06384

    2019 arXiv

  120. [134]

    Morales-Garoffolo A., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1837 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445.1647M 445, 1647

    2014 doi

  121. [135]

    Morales-Garoffolo A., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1972 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.454...95M 454, 95

    2015 doi

  122. [136]

    L., Vagnozzi A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2012.09.003 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013NewA...20...30M 20, 30

    Munari U., Henden A., Belligoli R., Castellani F., Cherini G., Righetti G. L., Vagnozzi A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newast.2012.09.003 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013NewA...20...30M 20, 30

    2013 doi

  123. [137]

    Nakaoka T., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aabee7 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...859...78N 859, 78

    2018 doi

  124. [138]

    Nugent P., Kim A., Perlmutter S., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/341707 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002PASP..114..803N 114, 803

    2002 doi

  125. [139]

    B., Anupama G

    Pandey S. B., Anupama G. C., Sagar R., Bhattacharya D., Sahu D. K., Pandey J. C., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06148.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.340..375P 340, 375

    2003

  126. [141]

    Pastorello A., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13618.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.389..955P 389, 955

    2008

  127. [143]

    Pastorello A., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2745 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.449.1921P 449, 1921

    2015 doi

  128. [144]

    Patat F., Barbon R., Cappellaro E., Turatto M., 1994, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994A

    1994

  129. [145]

    Patat F., et al., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321526 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...555..900P 555, 900

    2001 doi

  130. [146]

    B., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature09056 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010Natur.465..322P 465, 322

    Perets H. B., et al., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature09056 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010Natur.465..322P 465, 322

    2010 doi

  131. [147]

    Perlmutter S., et al., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/307221 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...517..565P 517, 565

    1999 doi

  132. [148]

    Pian E., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature05082 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006Natur.442.1011P 442, 1011

    2006 doi

  133. [149]

    Pignata G., et al., 2009, Central Bureau Electronic Telegrams, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009CBET.1731....1P 1731

    2009

  134. [150]

    Pignata G., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/728/1/14 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...728...14P 728, 14

    2011 doi

  135. [151]

    L., Nakar E., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/67 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...769...67P 769, 67

    Piro A. L., Nakar E., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/67 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...769...67P 769, 67

    2013 doi

  136. [153]

    J., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw299 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2016MNRAS.458.2973P 458, 2973

    Prentice S. J., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw299 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2016MNRAS.458.2973P 458, 2973

    2016 doi

  137. [154]

    M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018AJ....156..123T 156, 123

    Price-Whelan A. M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018AJ....156..123T 156, 123

    2018 doi

  138. [155]

    A., Roming P

    Pritchard T. A., Roming P. W. A., Brown P. J., Bayless A. J., Frey L. H., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/787/2/157 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2014ApJ...787..157P 787, 157

    2014 doi

  139. [156]

    Pun C. S. J., et al., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/192185 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJS...99..223P 99, 223

    1995 doi

  140. [157]

    E., 2006

    Rasmussen C. E., 2006. MIT Press

    2006

  141. [158]

    Rest A., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/44 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...795...44R 795, 44

    2014 doi

  142. [159]

    C., Baron E., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/338318 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AJ....123..745R 123, 745

    Richardson D., Branch D., Casebeer D., Millard J., Thomas R. C., Baron E., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/338318 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002AJ....123..745R 123, 745

    2002 doi

  143. [160]

    L., Wright J., Maddox L., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/147/5/118 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AJ....147..118R 147, 118

    Richardson D., Jenkins III R. L., Wright J., Maddox L., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/147/5/118 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AJ....147..118R 147, 118

    2014 doi

  144. [161]

    W., 2014, Journal of the American Association of Variable Star Observers (JAAVSO), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2014JAVSO..42..333R 42, 333

    Richmond M. W., 2014, Journal of the American Association of Variable Star Observers (JAAVSO), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2014JAVSO..42..333R 42, 333

    2014

  145. [162]

    W., Treffers R

    Richmond M. W., Treffers R. R., Filippenko A. V., Paik Y., Leibundgut B., Schulman E., Cox C. V., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1086/116915 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1994AJ....107.1022R 107, 1022

    1994 doi

  146. [163]

    W., et al., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/117785 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996AJ....111..327R 111, 327

    Richmond M. W., et al., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/117785 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996AJ....111..327R 111, 327

    1996 doi

  147. [164]

    G., et al., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300499 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AJ....116.1009R 116, 1009

    Riess A. G., et al., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300499 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AJ....116.1009R 116, 1009

    1998 doi

  148. [165]

    A., Tonry J

    Rodney S. A., Tonry J. L., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/1064 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...707.1064R 707, 1064

    2009 doi

  149. [166]

    Roming P. W. A., et al., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s11214-005-5095-4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2005SSRv..120...95R 120, 95

    2005 doi

  150. [167]

    Roming P. W. A., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/751/2/92 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...751...92R 751, 92

    2012 doi

  151. [168]

    Roy R., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/76 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...736...76R 736, 76

    2011 doi

  152. [169]

    Roy R., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1148 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2013MNRAS.434.2032R 434, 2032

    2013 doi

  153. [170]

    Rubin A., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/820/1/33 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...820...33R 820, 33

    2016 doi

  154. [172]

    K., Tanaka M., Anupama G

    Sahu D. K., Tanaka M., Anupama G. C., Gurugubelli U. K., Nomoto K., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/697/1/676 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...697..676S 697, 676

    2009 doi

  155. [173]

    K., Anupama G

    Sahu D. K., Anupama G. C., Chakradhari N. K., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt647 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.433....2S 433, 2

    2013 doi

  156. [174]

    Sako M., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/135/1/348 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AJ....135..348S 135, 348

    2008 doi

  157. [175]

    Sako M., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/738/2/162 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...738..162S 738, 162

    2011 doi

  158. [176]

    E., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/208 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2015ApJ...799..208S 799, 208

    Sanders N. E., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/208 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2015ApJ...799..208S 799, 208

    2015 doi

  159. [177]

    Saunders C., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaec7e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...869..167S 869, 167

    2018 doi

  160. [178]

    Savitzky A., Golay M. J. E., 1964, Analytical Chemistry, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1964AnaCh..36.1627S 36, 1627

    1964

  161. [179]

    M., 1990, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990MNRAS.244..269S 244, 269

    Schlegel E. M., 1990, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990MNRAS.244..269S 244, 269

    1990

  162. [180]

    J., Finkbeiner D

    Schlegel D. J., Finkbeiner D. P., Davis M., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305772 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...500..525S 500, 525

    1998 doi

  163. [181]

    Scolnic D., Kessler R., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/822/2/L35 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2016ApJ...822L..35S 822, L35

    2016 doi

  164. [182]

    M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab9bb , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...859..101S 859, 101

    Scolnic D. M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aab9bb , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...859..101S 859, 101

    2018 doi

  165. [183]

    Shivvers I., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1528 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461.3057S 461, 3057

    2016 doi

  166. [184]

    Shivvers I., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/aa54a6 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017PASP..129e4201S 129, 054201

    2017 doi

  167. [185]

    Shivvers I., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2719 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.482.1545S 482, 1545

    2019 doi

  168. [186]

    M., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21270.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.425.1789S 425, 1789

    Silverman J. M., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21270.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.425.1789S 425, 1789

    2012

  169. [187]

    M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx058 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467..369S 467, 369

    Silverman J. M., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx058 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467..369S 467, 369

    2017 doi

  170. [188]

    J., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425237 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A

    Smartt S. J., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425237 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A

    2015 doi

  171. [189]

    M., Foley R

    Smith N., Chornock R., Li W., Ganeshalingam M., Silverman J. M., Foley R. J., Filippenko A. V., Barth A. J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/591021 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...686..467S 686, 467

    2008 doi

  172. [190]

    Sonbas E., et al., 2008, @doi [Astrophysical Bulletin] 10.1134/S1990341308030036 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AstBu..63..228S 63, 228

    2008 doi

  173. [191]

    C., Sahu D

    Srivastav S., Anupama G. C., Sahu D. K., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1878 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445.1932S 445, 1932

    2014 doi

  174. [192]

    Stritzinger M., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/713 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...696..713S 696, 713

    2009 doi

  175. [193]

    D., et al., 2018a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730842 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    Stritzinger M. D., et al., 2018a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730842 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    doi

  176. [194]

    D., et al., 2018b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730843 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2018A&A...609A.135S 609, A135

    Stritzinger M. D., et al., 2018b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730843 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2018A&A...609A.135S 609, A135

    doi

  177. [195]

    Taddia F., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321180 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    2013 doi

  178. [196]

    Taddia F., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423915 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A

    2015 doi

  179. [197]

    Taddia F., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201730844 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    2018 doi

  180. [198]

    Takaki K., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/772/2/L17 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2013ApJ...772L..17T 772, L17

    2013 doi

  181. [199]

    Tak \'a ts K., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt2203 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2014MNRAS.438..368T 438, 368

    2014 doi

  182. [200]

    Tak \'a ts K., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv857 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.450.3137T 450, 3137

    2015 doi

  183. [201]

    Tartaglia L., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aa5c7f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2017ApJ...836L..12T 836, L12

    2017 doi

  184. [202]

    Taubenberger S., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10776.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.371.1459T 371, 1459

    2006

  185. [203]

    Taubenberger S., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15003.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009MNRAS.397..677T 397, 677

    2009

  186. [205]

    Terreran G., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1591 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462..137T 462, 137

    2016 doi

  187. [206]

    Terreran G., et al., 2017, @doi [Nature Astronomy] 10.1038/s41550-017-0228-8 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017NatAs...1..713T 1, 713

    2017 doi

  188. [207]

    arXiv:1810.00001

    The PLAsTiCC team et al., 2018, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2018arXiv181000001T p. arXiv:1810.00001

    2018 arXiv

  189. [208]

    Tomasella L., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1130 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.434.1636T 434, 1636

    2013 doi

  190. [209]

    Tripp R., 1998, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A

    1998

  191. [210]

    Y., Volkov I

    Tsvetkov D. Y., Volkov I. M., Sorokina E. I., Blinnikov S. I., Pavlyuk N. N., Borisov G. V., 2012, VizieR Online Data Catalog (other), https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012yCatp012003201T 0120, J/other/PZ/32

    2012

  192. [211]

    Turatto M., Benetti S., Cappellaro E., 2003, in Hillebrandt W., Leibundgut B., eds, From Twilight to Highlight: The Physics of Supernovae. p. 200 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0211219 ), @doi 10.1007/10828549_26

    2003 arXiv

  193. [212]

    D., Leibundgut B., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/310323 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/1996ApJ...471L..37V 471, L37

    Vacca W. D., Leibundgut B., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/310323 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/1996ApJ...471L..37V 471, L37

    1996 doi

  194. [213]

    Valenti S., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/527672 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...673L.155V 673, L155

    2008 doi

  195. [214]

    Valenti S., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19262.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.416.3138V 416, 3138

    2011

  196. [215]

    Valenti S., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/749/2/L28 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...749L..28V 749, L28

    2012 doi

  197. [216]

    Valenti S., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slt171 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.438L.101V 438, L101

    2014 doi

  198. [217]

    Valenti S., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv208 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2015MNRAS.448.2608V 448, 2608

    2015 doi

  199. [218]

    Valenti S., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw870 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.459.3939V 459, 3939

    2016 doi

  200. [219]

    D., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/147/2/37 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AJ....147...37V 147, 37

    Van Dyk S. D., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/147/2/37 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AJ....147...37V 147, 37

    2014 doi

  201. [220]

    R., Suntzeff N

    Walker A. R., Suntzeff N. B., 1990, @doi [ ] 10.1086/132618 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990PASP..102..131W 102, 131

    1990 doi

  202. [221]

    A., et al., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/234.1.5P , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988MNRAS.234P...5W 234, 5P

    Whitelock P. A., et al., 1988, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/234.1.5P , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1988MNRAS.234P...5W 234, 5P

    1988 doi

  203. [222]

    Yaron O., Gal-Yam A., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1086/666656 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012PASP..124..668Y 124, 668

    2012 doi

  204. [223]

    Yaron O., et al., 2017, @doi [Nature Physics] 10.1038/nphys4025 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/\#abs/2017NatPh..13..510Y 13, 510

    2017 doi

  205. [224]

    Yuan F., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1419 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.461.2003Y 461, 2003

    2016 doi

  206. [225]

    Zhang J., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/797/1/5 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...797....5Z 797, 5

    2014 doi

  207. [226]

    Zwitter T., Munari U., Moretti S., 2004, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004IAUC.8413....1Z 8413

    2004

  208. [227]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.stat...

  209. [228]

    N., 2013, Journal of Improbable Astronomy, 1, 1

    Author A. N., 2013, Journal of Improbable Astronomy, 1, 1

    2013

  210. [229]

    D., 2015, Journal of Interesting Stuff, 17, 198

    Jones C. D., 2015, Journal of Interesting Stuff, 17, 198

    2015

  211. [230]

    B., 2014, The Example Journal, 12, 345 (Paper I)

    Smith A. B., 2014, The Example Journal, 12, 345 (Paper I)

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.