Dessins d'enfants and Brauer configuration algebras

Goran Mali\'c; Sibylle Schroll

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 23 references

Dessins d'enfants and Brauer configuration algebras

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Galois twists preserve the size of a dessin's algebra and centre

desk verdict The algebra-dimension theorem is sound, but the centre-dimension claim, one of the two headline results, is unproven because it silently relies on a loop-count invariant that Lemma 7.2 never establishes. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.05509 v1 pith:MV2N3TQ7 submitted 2019-08-15 math.RT math.COmath.NT

Goran Malić , Sibylle Schroll This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.RTmath.COmath.NT MSC 16P1011G3214H57

keywords dessinsd'enfantsBrauerconfigurationalgebrasabsoluteGaloisgroupinvariantsfinitedimensionalquiverandrelationscentreofanalgebradual

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper builds a bridge from a combinatorial encoding of algebraic curves—a dessin d'enfant, a bipartite graph drawn on an oriented surface—to finite-dimensional associative algebras. To each dessin $D$ it assigns a Brauer configuration algebra $\Lambda_D = KQ_D/I_D$, whose quiver and relations are read off from the cyclic order of half-edges around the dessin's vertices. The paper's central claim is that if $D$ is replaced by a Galois-conjugate dessin, the dimension of $\Lambda_D$ and the dimension of its centre are unchanged. It also shows that Galois-conjugate dessins have isomorphic centres, and that a dessin and its dual have path algebras that are opposite to each other in the absence of degree-one vertices and faces. The point is to export representation-theoretic quantities as candidates for arithmetic invariants of the absolute Galois group.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Brauer configuration algebra $\Lambda_D=KQ_D/I_D$ built from a dessin's permutation representation. The quiver $Q_D$ is determined by the cycle decomposition of the black-vertex permutation $\sigma$; each black vertex of degree at least two contributes a special $\sigma$-cycle, and the cycle lengths of $\sigma$ are exactly the black-vertex degrees. The ideal $I_D$ is generated by three types of relations: relations identifying special cycles that share a white vertex, relations that kill powers of special cycles, and relations that kill two-arrow paths appearing in no special cycle. This machinery converts the combinatorial data of the dessin into a finite-dimensional algebra whose dimension and centre dimension are explicit formulas in invariant counting data.

What would settle it

Check the two Galois-conjugate dessins in Example 2.6, or any pair of conjugate genus-zero dessins with the same passport, and compute $|L_D|$ for each. If a pair is found whose loop-arrow counts differ, their centre dimensions $1+|Q_0|+|L_D|$ would differ, disproving Proposition 7.6; if no such pair exists among small dessins, the invariance is supported but still not fully proved by the cited lemma.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims a Galois-invariance theorem for the algebra attached to a dessin. For a dessin $D$ with permutation data $(\sigma,\alpha,\phi)$, the quiver $Q_D$ has one vertex per white vertex and one arrow per half-edge except for degree-one black vertices; the ideal $I_D$ is generated by relations that identify special $\sigma$-cycles at the same vertex and kill two-arrow paths lying in no special cycle. The dimension of $\Lambda_D=KQ_D/I_D$ is $2|Q_0|+\sum_{C_i\in S}|C_i|(|C_i|-1)$, and the dimension of its centre is $1+|Q_0|+|L_D|$, where $L_D$ is the set of loop arrows in $Q_D$. Both quantities are claimed to be invariant under the action of $\mathrm{Gal}(\overline{\mathbb{Q}}/\mathbb{Q})$, because each term is a Galois-invariant count of vertices, arrows, or black-vertex degrees. The paper further proves that Galois-conjugate dessins have isomorphic centres and that, when no degree-one vertices or faces occur, the quiver of the dual dessin is the opposite of the original quiver.

Load-bearing premise

The proof that the centre dimension is Galois-invariant rests on an unstated premise: the number of loop arrows in $Q_D$ must itself be Galois-invariant, since Lemma 7.2 only proves invariance for vertex counts, arrow counts, black-vertex degrees, and number of black vertices, and the centre claim would collapse if Galois conjugation changed that loop count.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Galois-conjugate dessins have Brauer configuration algebras of the same dimension, so that dimension can be used as a coarse arithmetic invariant.
Galois-conjugate dessins have isomorphic centres, making the centre a representation-theoretic invariant that is stronger than a mere dimension count.
In the absence of degree-one vertices and faces, passing to the dual dessin reverses the quiver, so duality acts predictably on the associated algebra.
The families $f_n(z)=z^n$ and $f_n(z)=(z^n+1)^2/4z^n$ give explicit dessins whose algebras are symmetric Nakayama algebras and Koszul Brauer graph algebras, providing test cases for the invariance statement.
The construction generalises the known special case of clean dessins and Brauer graph algebras, so any Galois invariant found here automatically produces invariants in the Brauer-graph-algebra setting.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the centre dimension is to distinguish Galois orbits, the loop-arrow count must be the sensitive term; a systematic search for conjugate dessins with equal passports but different loop counts would directly probe the gap in the proof.
Because the dimension formulas depend only on counts, any genuinely arithmetic information must live in the quiver's cycle structure and in the relations; future orbit invariants should be sought in higher Hochschild cohomology or in the representation category rather than in dimensions.
The dual-dessin description suggests that map-theoretic operations such as taking duals or partial duals could be mirrored by algebra operations, potentially linking the Brauer configuration algebras of dual dessins through derived equivalences or other structural comparisons.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague,

The paper is worth a look, but the headline result has a hole. The authors associate a Brauer configuration algebra to every dessin d'enfant, extending their earlier clean-dessin work to arbitrary dessins, and they prove two Galois-invariance claims. The first, on the algebra dimension, is fine: dim Λ_D depends only on |Q0| and the degrees of black vertices, all of which are passport invariants. The second, on the centre dimension, is not proven. Proposition 7.6 computes dim Z(Λ_D) = 1 + |Q0| + |L_D| and then says "by Lemma 7.2, all the summands are invariants." Lemma 7.2 lists |Q0|, |Q1|, |S|, and the lengths of σ-cycles; it never mentions |L_D|, the number of loop arrows in Q_D. A loop arises when two consecutive half-edges around a black vertex are incident to the same white vertex. That is a property of the cyclic arrangement, not of the degree sequence. The paper gives no argument that Galois conjugation preserves it. The likely fix is a direct proof that |L_D| is Galois invariant, perhaps through the monodromy group; but without that, the centre-dimension theorem and Theorem 7.8 (isomorphic centres) are unsupported. I have not found a concrete counterexample, so the claim may be true, but the proof is incomplete.

What is genuinely new: the construction from arbitrary dessins is natural and clearly explained; the examples (symmetric Nakayama algebras, Koszul Brauer graph algebras) are useful; the dual quiver theorem in Section 6 looks correct and is a nice observation. The paper is well-written, and the line from dessin to algebra to quiver is transparent. The algebra-dimension theorem alone is a modest but valid contribution.

Minor issues: Theorem 6.3 says "if D has no vertices and no faces of degree 1," presumably meaning no black vertices of degree 1; there is also a typo "targed" in Proposition 6.2. These do not affect the mathematics.

Recommendation: send it to a serious referee, but ask for a fix of Proposition 7.6. If the authors can prove |L_D| is Galois invariant, the paper is a solid contribution to an active area. If not, they need to weaken the abstract and Theorem 7.8.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper associates to each dessin d'enfant a finite-dimensional associative algebra, called a Brauer configuration algebra, by constructing a quiver and an admissible ideal from the monodromy permutations of the dessin. The Quillen-Suslin-style main claims are that the K-dimension of the algebra and the K-dimension of its centre are invariant under the action of the absolute Galois group on the dessin, and that Galois-conjugate dessins have isomorphic centres. The paper also compares the Brauer configuration algebras of a dessin and its dual, showing in certain cases that the underlying quivers are opposite. Several examples connect the construction to symmetric Nakayama algebras and to quotients of preprojective algebras.

Significance. If the main claims hold, the paper provides new representation-theoretic invariants of Galois orbits of dessins, extending the authors' earlier work on clean dessins and Brauer graph algebras. The algebra-dimension theorem (Theorem 7.4) appears sound: its formula only involves the number of white vertices and the degrees of black vertices, both of which are Galois-invariant passport data. The connection to Brauer configuration algebras is a natural and potentially useful bridge between two areas. However, the centre-dimension claim is not adequately supported in the present manuscript, and one of the two headline results therefore has a load-bearing gap.

major comments (3)

[§7, Proposition 7.6] The proof of Proposition 7.6 states that dim_K Z(Λ_D) = 1 + |Q_0| + |L_D| and concludes invariance by saying "By lemma 7.2, all the summands are invariants." Lemma 7.2, however, lists only |Q_0|, |Q_1|, |S|, and the cycle lengths |σ_i|; it says nothing about |L_D|, the number of loop arrows in Q_D. This is not merely an omitted detail: a loop arrow occurs when two consecutive half-edges around a black vertex belong to the same white vertex, i.e. |L_D| = #{i : α(i) = α(iσ)}, which depends on the cyclic order of white vertices around black vertices, not solely on the passport data that Lemma 7.2 establishes as Galois-invariant. The manuscript gives no argument that this cyclic-order information is preserved by Galois conjugation, and known properties of Galois orbits of dessins do not make this automatic. Thus the invariance of dim_K Z(Λ_D) is not established by the proof given.
[§7, Theorem 7.8] Theorem 7.8 relies directly on Proposition 7.6, so it inherits the gap just described. In addition, the proof of Theorem 7.8 constructs a vector-space isomorphism f : Z(Λ_1) → Z(Λ_2) that maps loops to loops and special cycles to special cycles. Even if the total dimensions of the centres were known to be equal, such a map need not exist without separate control of the number of loops and the number of special cycles in the two centres. The paper does not prove these finer equalities independently; they would follow from a valid proof of Proposition 7.6, but as the manuscript stands they are additional unproved assertions.
[§7, Lemma 7.2] In the proof of Lemma 7.2(ii), the authors write that |Q_1| is equal to the total number of half-edges of the dessin. This is not correct in general: by Definition 4.1, formal loop arrows arising from black vertices of degree 1 are removed from the quiver, so |Q_1| equals the number of half-edges minus the number of degree-1 black vertices. The claim that |Q_1| is a Galois invariant is still true, because the number of degree-1 black vertices is part of the degree sequence, but the justification given in the paper is inaccurate and should be corrected.

minor comments (3)

[Section 6, Proposition 6.2] There is a typo in Proposition 6.2: "targed" should be "target".
[Remark 4.5] Remark 4.5 refers to "quiver Q_2 without the formal loop arrows as in Figure 5," but Figure 5 illustrates a local vertex configuration, not the quiver of Example 4.4; the intended reference appears to be Figure 6.
[Theorem 6.3] The statement of Theorem 6.3 says "if D has no vertices and no faces of degree 1," which is ambiguous. From the proof, the intended hypothesis is that D has no black vertices of degree 1 and no faces of degree 1, since formal loops in the quiver and its dual arise precisely from these two sources.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reduction found; the centre-dimension gap in Proposition 7.6 is an unsupported premise about |L_D|, not a circular derivation.

full rationale

The paper's main derivation chain is not circular. Theorem 7.4 combines the known dimension formula dim_K Λ_D = 2|Q_0| + Σ_{C_i∈S} |C_i|(|C_i|-1), cited to [9], with Lemma 7.2, whose four listed quantities are ordinary passport invariants: numbers of white and black vertices, number of half-edges, and the degree sequence. The conclusion follows from these external facts rather than from the conclusion itself. Although [9] shares an author with the present paper, it is a prior, parameter-free result about general Brauer configuration algebras and does not contain the Galois-invariance claim being proved, so it is independent support rather than a load-bearing self-citation. The centre-dimension part is different and should be flagged as a correctness gap. Proposition 7.6 uses dim_K Z(Λ_D) = 1+|Q_0|+|L_D|, cited to [22], and its proof says 'By lemma 7.2, all the summands are invariants.' Lemma 7.2 does not mention |L_D|, the number of loop arrows, which depends on the cyclic order of half-edges around black vertices. If Galois conjugation can change that cyclic order while preserving the passport, |L_D| is not automatically invariant, and Proposition 7.6 and Theorem 7.8 would be unsupported. This is a real unsupported premise, but it is not a circularity: the paper does not define |L_D| in terms of the centre dimension, does not fit a parameter, and does not reduce the centre claim to a self-citation. The only thematically overlapping self-citation, [17], concerns clean dessins and Brauer graph algebras and is contextual rather than load-bearing for the algebra- and centre-dimension theorems. No step in the derivation is equivalent to its input by construction or by definition, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central proof leans on two cited dimension formulas and on the unproved loop-count invariance. No genuinely new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)

multiplicity function μ(σ_j) = 1
In Section 4, the authors set the BCA multiplicity function μ(σ_j)=1 for every black vertex. This choice is not derived from the dessin; it is imposed and the dimension and centre formulas used later depend on it.

assumptions (4)

standard math Belyi's theorem (Theorem 2.4): a smooth projective curve X over C is defined over Qbar if and only if there is a holomorphic covering f:X to CP1 ramified at most over {0,1,infinity}.
Used in Section 2.2 to justify the action of Gal(Qbar/Q) on dessins; cited to Belyi.
domain assumption Brauer configuration algebra dimension formula dim_K Λ_D = 2|Q0| + sum_{Ci in S} |Ci|(|Ci|-1).
Quoted from Green and Schroll [9] in Section 7 and used in Theorem 7.4 without proof.
domain assumption Centre dimension formula dim_K Z(Λ_D) = 1 + |Q0| + |L_D|.
Quoted from Sierra [22] in Section 7 and used in Proposition 7.6 without proof.
ad hoc to paper The quantity |L_D|, the number of loop arrows in Q_D, is a Galois invariant.
Used implicitly in the proof of Proposition 7.6, but neither stated in Lemma 7.2 nor proved anywhere in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dessins d'enfants and Brauer configuration algebras." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MV2N3TQ7

@misc{pith2026190805509,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dessins d'enfants and Brauer configuration algebras},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MV2N3TQ7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.05509}
}

read the original abstract

In this paper we associate to a dessin d'enfant an associative algebra, called a Brauer configuration algebra. This is an algebra given by quiver and relations induced by the monodromy of the dessin d'enfant. We show that the dimension of the Brauer configuration algebra associated to a dessin d'enfant and the dimension of the centre this algebra are invariant under the action of the absolute Galois group. We give some examples of well-known algebras and their dessins d'enfants. Finally we show that the Brauer configuration algebras of a dessin d'enfant and its dual share the same path algebra.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.05509 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** The positive (shaded) and negative triangles are mapped to the upper and lower-half plane, respectively. The sides of the triangles are mapped to R ∪ {∞} so that the black and white vertices map to 0 and 1, respectively, and the face centres map to ∞. Now send the positive and negative triangles to the upper and lower half-plane of C, respectively, and send the sides of the triangles to the real line so that black, … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Labelling of half-edges. The labels are always on the left when looking from a black vertex to its adjacent white vertices. Following convention 1, label the half-edges of a dessin arbitrarily. Now let σ and α denote the permutations which record the cyclic (counter-clockwise) orderings of the labels around black and white vertices, respectively, and let ϕ denote the permutation which records the counter-clockwise o… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** The two dessins (X, f) and (Xθ , f θ ) from example 2.6. The dotted lines indicate the boundary of the polygon representation of a genus 1 surface with the usual identification of the left-and-right and top-and-bottom sides. Note that we must consider g ◦ πx and not just πx since πx is not a Bely˘ı map; it is ramified over four points, namely 0, 1, 3 + 2√ 3 and ∞. However, g maps these four points onto the set {0, 1… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (10 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: A dessin D (left) and its quiver on the right. The differently coloured arrows in the quiver correspond to the different non-trivial cycles of the permutation σ of D. Let K be a field. Recall that given a quiver Q, the path algebra KQ, has vector space basis given by a…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: A vertex σj of degree 5 in a dessin with the corresponding cycle in QD. Note that a4 is a loop since α4 shares two (consecutive) edges with σj . respectively given by at α1 : a1a2a3a4a5, at α2 : a2a3a4a5a1, at α3 : a3a4a5a1a2. However, there are two special σj -cycles …

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The quiver QD from Example 4.4. Arrows are labelled according to colour (r for red, g for green, b for brown). The dashed loop arrows are formal. Relations of type two are given by: σ1 : σ1-cycle at α1 z }| { r1r2r3r4r5r1, σ1-cycle at α2 z }| { r2r3r4r5r1r2, σ1-cycle …

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: The quiver QD4 corresponding to the dessin D4 = (CP1 , z4 ). The corresponding Brauer configuration algebras KQDn /IDn are symmetric Nakayama algebras. 5.2. Koszul Brauer configuration algebras. Let Dn = (CP1 , fn) be the family of dessins given by the Bely˘ı maps fn :…

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: The dessin D6 and its associated quiver. The special cycles are given by the paths aia 0 i and a 0 i ai for i = 1, . . . , 6. Note in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: In a polygonal face of degree d ≥ 2 pairs of consecutive arrows belong to distinct σ-cycles. Note that not every cyclic path in which consecutive arrows are type 3 relations corresponds to a face, see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: The path r1b1m1y1c1o1 has no repeated arrows, and all of its subpaths of length 2 as well as o1r1 are relations of type 3, yet it corresponds to no face of the underlying dessin. In general, a face of D with vertices σ1, . . . , σk of degree at least 2 gives rise to p…

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: A dessin (full) and its dual (dashed). The black vertices of the dual are indicated by . Theorem 6.3. Let D be a dessin and let D∗ be its dual dessin. Then the quivers Q˚D and Q˚op D∗ are equal. Furthermore, if D has no vertices and no faces of degree 1 then the quiv…

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: The arrows in a face of a dessin (in green) form a cycle oriented clockwise around the corresponding dual vertex. The dual halfedges are shown in red. Example 6.4. Let D be the dessin given by the bipartite 6-gon, as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png]

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: The 6-gon dessin (blue), its quiver (green), and its dual dessin (dashed red). Example 6.5. The dessins Dn = (CP1 , zn ) are self-dual, i.e. D∗ n ∼= Dn. The Brauer configuration algebra KQD∗ n /ID∗ n associated to the dual D∗ of D is again a symmetric Nakayama algebra…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

[1]

Elements of the representation theory of associative algebras

Assem, Ibrahim; Simson, Daniel; Skowro´ nski, Andrzej. Elements of the representation theory of associative algebras. Vol. 1. Techniques of representation theory. London Mathematical Society Student Texts, 65. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006

work page 2006
[2]

On Galois Extensions of a Maximal Cyclotomic Field

Bely˘ ı, Gennadii V. On Galois Extensions of a Maximal Cyclotomic Field. Math. USSR Izvestija 14 (1980) 247–256

work page 1980
[3]

A New Proof of the Three Point Theorem

Bely˘ ı, Gennadii V. A New Proof of the Three Point Theorem. Sb. Math. 193(3-4) (2002) 329–332

work page 2002
[4]

George Galois theories

Borceux, Francis; Janelidze. George Galois theories. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001

work page 2001
[5]

Indecomposable representations II,Symposia Mathematics Instituto Nazionale di allz

Gabriel, Peter. Indecomposable representations II,Symposia Mathematics Instituto Nazionale di allz. Matematica, Roma, 1973

work page 1973
[6]

Introduction to compact Riemann surfaces and dessins d’enfants

Girondo, Ernesto; Gonz´ alez-Diez, Gabino. Introduction to compact Riemann surfaces and dessins d’enfants. London Mathematical Society Student Texts, 79. Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2012

work page 2012
[7]

A new proof of Bely˘ ı’s Theorem

Goldring, Wushi. A new proof of Bely˘ ı’s Theorem. J. Number Theory 135 (2014), 151–154

work page 2014
[8]

Multiserial and special multiserial algebras and their represen- tations

Green, Edward L.; Schroll, Sibylle. Multiserial and special multiserial algebras and their represen- tations. Adv. Math. 302 (2016), 1111–1136

work page 2016

Show all 23 references

[9]

Brauer conﬁguration algebras: a generalization of Brauer graph algebras

Green, Edward L.; Schroll, Sibylle. Brauer conﬁguration algebras: a generalization of Brauer graph algebras. Bull. Sci. Math. 141 (2017), no. 6, 539–572

2017
[10]

The Ext algebra of a Brauer graph algebra

Green, Edward L.; Schroll, Sibylle; Snashall, Nicole; Taillefer, Rachel. The Ext algebra of a Brauer graph algebra. J. Noncommut. Geom. 11 (2017), no. 2, 537–579

2017
[11]

Esquisse d’un programme

Grothendieck, Alexandre. Esquisse d’un programme. [Sketch of a program] With an English trans- lation on pp. 243–283. London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., 242, Geometric Galois actions, 1, 5–48, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1997

1997
[12]

Indecomposable modules for ﬁnite groups

Janusz, Gerald. Indecomposable modules for ﬁnite groups. Ann. of Math. (2) 89 (1969) 209–241

1969
[13]

Dessins D’enfants on Riemann Surfaces

Jones, Gareth A; Wolfart, J¨ urgen. Dessins D’enfants on Riemann Surfaces. Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, cham, 2016

2016
[14]

¨Uber die Transformationen elfter Ordnung der elliptischen Funktionen

Klein, Felix. ¨Uber die Transformationen elfter Ordnung der elliptischen Funktionen. Mathematis- che Annalen 15.3 (1879), 533–555
[15]

Graphs on surfaces and their applications

Lando, Sergei K.; Zvonkin, Alexander K. Graphs on surfaces and their applications. With an ap- pendix by Don B. Zagier. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, 141. Low-Dimensional Topol- ogy, II. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004

2004
[16]

Dessins, their delta-matroids and partial duals

Malic, Goran. Dessins, their delta-matroids and partial duals. Symmetries in graphs, maps, and polytopes, 213–247, Springer Proc. Math. Stat., 159, 2016

2016
[17]

Dessins d’enfants, Brauer graph algebras and Galois invariants, arXiv:1902.09876

Malic, Goran; Schroll, Sibylle. Dessins d’enfants, Brauer graph algebras and Galois invariants, arXiv:1902.09876

1902 arXiv
[18]

Biserial algebras and graphs

Roggenkamp, Klaus. Biserial algebras and graphs. Algebras and modules, II (Geiranger, 1996), 481–496, CMS Conf. Proc., 24, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1998. 20 GORAN MALI ´C AND SIBYLLE SCHROLL

1996
[19]

Quiver representations

Schiﬄer, Ralf. Quiver representations. CMS Books in Mathematics/Ouvrages de Math´ ematiques de la SMC. Springer, Cham, 2014

2014
[20]

The Grothendieck Theory of Dessins D’Enfants

Schneps, Leila (Edt.). The Grothendieck Theory of Dessins D’Enfants. Vol 200 LMS Lecture Note Series, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994

1994
[21]

Geometric Galois Actions 1

Schneps, Leila; Lochak, Pierre. Geometric Galois Actions 1. Around Grothendieck’s Esquisse d’un Programme. Vol 242 LMS Lecture Note Series, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997

1997
[22]

The Dimension of the Center of a Brauer Conﬁguration Algebra

Sierra, Alex. The Dimension of the Center of a Brauer Conﬁguration Algebra. J. Algebra 510 (2018), 289–318

2018
[23]

Vol 117 Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics

Szamuely, Tam´ as Galois groups and fundamental groups. Vol 117 Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009. Department of Computer Science, Smith College, Northampton, MA 01063, USA E-mail address: goranm00@gmail.com Department of Ma...

2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Elements of the representation theory of associative algebras

Assem, Ibrahim; Simson, Daniel; Skowro´ nski, Andrzej. Elements of the representation theory of associative algebras. Vol. 1. Techniques of representation theory. London Mathematical Society Student Texts, 65. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006

work page 2006

[2] [2]

On Galois Extensions of a Maximal Cyclotomic Field

Bely˘ ı, Gennadii V. On Galois Extensions of a Maximal Cyclotomic Field. Math. USSR Izvestija 14 (1980) 247–256

work page 1980

[3] [3]

A New Proof of the Three Point Theorem

Bely˘ ı, Gennadii V. A New Proof of the Three Point Theorem. Sb. Math. 193(3-4) (2002) 329–332

work page 2002

[4] [4]

George Galois theories

Borceux, Francis; Janelidze. George Galois theories. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001

work page 2001

[5] [5]

Indecomposable representations II,Symposia Mathematics Instituto Nazionale di allz

Gabriel, Peter. Indecomposable representations II,Symposia Mathematics Instituto Nazionale di allz. Matematica, Roma, 1973

work page 1973

[6] [6]

Introduction to compact Riemann surfaces and dessins d’enfants

Girondo, Ernesto; Gonz´ alez-Diez, Gabino. Introduction to compact Riemann surfaces and dessins d’enfants. London Mathematical Society Student Texts, 79. Cambridge University Press, Cam- bridge, 2012

work page 2012

[7] [7]

A new proof of Bely˘ ı’s Theorem

Goldring, Wushi. A new proof of Bely˘ ı’s Theorem. J. Number Theory 135 (2014), 151–154

work page 2014

[8] [8]

Multiserial and special multiserial algebras and their represen- tations

Green, Edward L.; Schroll, Sibylle. Multiserial and special multiserial algebras and their represen- tations. Adv. Math. 302 (2016), 1111–1136

work page 2016