Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 48 references

Chaos on a High-Dimensional Torus

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read In coupled circle maps with three or more phases, chaos can coexist with a growing number of exactly neutral directions, forming what the authors call toric chaos.

desk verdict Toric chaos is a plausible new attractor class but the O(N) null-exponent count rests on a single asymmetric finite-time threshold; worth serious referee attention with code and convergence checks. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06617 v1 pith:46LNOIMF submitted 2019-08-19 nlin.CD

classification nlin.CD MSC 37D4537C55
keywords toricchaoshigh-dimensionaltorusLyapunovexponentsgloballycoupledcirclemapsquasiperiodicityinverseparticipationratiochaoticitinerancyfractal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether quasiperiodic motion with many frequencies can pass into chaos while keeping its high-dimensional torus skeleton. Using $N$ globally coupled circle maps with heterogeneous natural frequencies, it shows that for $N \ge 3$ chaos can appear even when the map is invertible, and this 'toric chaos' carries not just one or a few positive Lyapunov exponents but also a number of null (neutral) exponents that grows linearly with $N$. The first Lyapunov vector of toric chaos is neither fully delocalized nor localized: its inverse participation ratio $Y_2$ decays as the inverse cube root of the Lyapunov dimension $D_L$, and its power spectrum shows $1/f^{3/2}$ slow itinerancy. If true, the result means that high-dimensional tori are not transient curiosities; they host a recurring type of chaos with an extensive neutral dimension, relevant to systems in which many quasiperiodic modes coexist with disorder.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the $N$-dimensional globally coupled circle map together with its Lyapunov spectrum, especially the count $M$ of null Lyapunov exponents and the inverse participation ratio $Y_2$ of the first Lyapunov vector. The map combines heterogeneous natural frequencies with global sinusoidal coupling and can be invertible when the nonlinearity $a$ lies below a critical value. The diagnostic that carries the argument is the plateau of $O(N)$ exponents that are exactly or nearly zero; chaos with such a plateau is identified as chaos 'on a torus.' The scaling $Y_2 \sim D_L^{-1/3}$ and the $1/f^{3/2}$ power spectrum serve as signatures of the first Lyapunov vector's slow, itinerant spread across the torus.

What would settle it

Extend the Lyapunov computation to longer integration times at fixed parameters and check whether the number $M$ of exponents below the $10^{-4}$ threshold stays constant or shrinks; if $M$ decreases systematically with time, the neutral plateau is a finite-time artifact. Separately, vary $N$ while holding the Lyapunov dimension $D_L$ fixed and see whether the inverse participation ratio follows $D_L^{-1/3}$; if $Y_2$ instead stays $O(1)$, the claimed delocalization is not a property of the torus dimension.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is the existence and prevalence of toric chaos in $N$-dimensional globally coupled circle maps with $N \ge 3$. For invertible parameter regimes ($a$ below the critical value $a_c$), where the one-dimensional circle map cannot be chaotic, chaotic attractors appear that sit on or near an $M$-dimensional torus: their Lyapunov spectra show one or a few positive exponents, $O(N)$ exponents indistinguishable from zero, and compensating negative exponents. The number $M$ of neutral directions is extensive, growing linearly with $N$, and the first Lyapunov vector's inverse participation ratio $Y_2$ scales as $D_L^{-1/3}$, indicating that the unstable direction spreads over the torus but with partial localization, while its power spectrum shows $1/f^{3/2}$ fluctuations. The paper also reports that full $N$-dimensional tori exist but become exponentially rare with $N$, and that the torus-to-chaos transition passes through fractalized tori, interpreted as strange nonchaotic attractors.

Load-bearing premise

The classification of toric chaos depends on counting a Lyapunov exponent as exactly zero whenever it falls between $-10^{-5}$ and $10^{-4}$ on a finite simulation; if those exponents actually converge to small nonzero values as the simulation time grows, the claim of $O(N)$ null exponents and the torus dimension would fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For systems with $N \ge 3$ phases in the invertible regime, toric chaos is a possible attractor and its frequency of occurrence grows with $N$ before saturating, so high-dimensional tori are not automatically destroyed by weak nonlinearity.
  • The neutral dimension $M$ is extensive, so in the large-$N$ limit toric chaos carries a macroscopic number of near-zero Lyapunov exponents, making its effective attractor dimension scale with system size.
  • Unlike standard chaos, where the first Lyapunov vector is localized, toric chaos has a delocalized first Lyapunov vector with $Y_2$ approximately proportional to $D_L^{-1/3}$ and slow $1/f^{3/2}$ dynamics.
  • The transition from a torus to toric chaos is accompanied by fractalization of the torus, suggesting that autonomous strange nonchaotic attractors can appear at this transition.
  • Toric chaos provides a possible dynamical picture for chaotic itinerancy and for systems such as EEG or turbulence that combine broad frequency spectra with quasiperiodic components.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the paper's supplement relation $D_L \simeq M + 0.3N$ is taken literally, toric chaos in the large-$N$ limit would carry a fixed density of positive-expansion directions, so the chaotic component itself would be extensive.
  • A sharper definition of the neutral plateau, based on convergence with integration time rather than the fixed $10^{-4}$ threshold, would let the claim $M = O(N)$ be tested as an asymptotic property rather than a finite-time count.
  • Because the paper reports the same qualitative behavior with heterogeneous couplings and with Kuramoto-type sine coupling, one can expect toric chaos in other large coupled-oscillator networks, where the same $Y_2 \sim D_L^{-1/3}$ and $1/f^{3/2}$ signatures could be sought.
  • The $1/f^{3/2}$ slow dynamics of the first Lyapunov vector resembles intermittency in shell models of turbulence; checking whether the same exponent controls energy-transfer fluctuations in such models would connect toric chaos to the Landau picture of turbulence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies N-dimensional globally coupled circle maps with heterogeneous frequencies, combining numerical Lyapunov spectra, inverse participation ratios, and bifurcation diagrams. It reports three findings: (i) N-dimensional tori exist but their fraction decays exponentially with N; (ii) in the invertible regime, chaos with many near-zero Lyapunov exponents, termed toric chaos, occurs for N≥3, with an extensive number M∼O(N) of null exponents, a delocalized first Lyapunov vector obeying Y2∼DL^{-1/3}, and 1/f^{3/2} slow dynamics; (iii) the torus-to-chaos transition appears to proceed through fractalization (strange nonchaotic) of the torus, although the authors state that this is difficult to prove rigorously. The paper is framed as a numerical exploration and discusses possible relevance to neural dynamics and turbulence.

Significance. If confirmed, toric chaos extends the Ruelle-Takens-Newhouse picture by demonstrating a class of high-dimensional chaotic attractors whose neutral subspace dimension grows linearly with system size, and it gives concrete, falsifiable scaling predictions (Y2∼DL^{-1/3}, 1/f^{3/2} spectra). Strengths include long simulations (2.5×10^6 iterations), scaling collapses over N=50–800, and robustness checks with heterogeneous and Kuramoto-type couplings. The central caveat is that the null-exponent count rests on a finite-time threshold rather than on convergence tests, so the extensive-torus-dimension claim is not yet established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Footnote [32]; Figs. 1(f) and 2(a)] The criterion used to count null Lyapunov exponents, namely a value in (-1e-5, 1e-4) after 2.5×10^6 iterations, is asymmetric and does not establish that the exponents are zero in the infinite-time limit. Near-neutral exponents in high-dimensional systems converge slowly and have finite-time fluctuations that can easily be of order 1e-4; without convergence tests in the integration time T and in N, the claims of O(N) null Lyapunov exponents and M-dimensional toric chaos are not yet supported. I request plots of individual exponents versus T for representative parameters, a threshold-sensitivity analysis (e.g., symmetric thresholds at 1e-3, 1e-4, 1e-5), and a statement of how M/N behaves as T and N increase.
  2. [Fig. 2(a) and the paragraph beginning 'Toric chaos shows the accumulation...'] The extensivity of M rests on the scaled Lyapunov spectra, but the neutral plateau in Fig. 2(a) is displayed only at a fixed threshold, and the inset for N=100–800 does not show whether the number of exponents satisfying the zero criterion converges to a well-defined fraction of N as N grows. Reporting M/N and its dependence on N and T, with error bars over the random frequency ensembles, is needed to substantiate the claim that the torus dimension is extensive.
  3. [Definition of toric chaos and the sentence 'such chaos exists on (or in the vicinity of) a torus'] The paper identifies toric chaos with the presence of M null Lyapunov exponents, but null exponents can also arise from marginal directions, symmetries, or slow manifolds that are not quasiperiodic tori. The manuscript does not provide a direct check that the neutral directions correspond to angles circulating on an invariant torus, such as bounded phases with nonzero rotation numbers. At minimum, this identification should be stated as an assumption and a concrete numerical test for it should be described.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Page 3 (text near Fig. 2)] The word 'appearrance' should be 'appearance'.
  2. [Page 3, paragraph 'Note that, in the invertible regime...'] The statement that Σλ_i≤0 always holds in the invertible regime is not derived and is only confirmed numerically; please either provide a proof or qualify it to the studied parameter range.
  3. [Fig. 3(d) and its caption] The box-counting dimension is said to be computed for 240^3 bins; please clarify whether this means 240 bins per dimension and whether the estimate is checked for convergence in box size.
  4. [Footnote [33]] The fitted values p≈0.36 and p≈0.49 are presented without uncertainties or goodness-of-fit measures; since the estimate is explicitly rough, please state that these values are illustrative only.
  5. [Figs. 1(c) and 1(f)] The convention for torus dimension in the map versus in the flow (M in the map, M+1 in the flow) is easy to confuse; please define the convention explicitly in the captions of Fig. 1(c) and Fig. 1(f).
  6. [Conclusion, last paragraph] The fractalization route is presented as 'suggested' and 'difficult to prove,' but the concluding discussion treats it as a likely mechanism; please label it explicitly as a conjecture so that it is not read as an established result.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

Only minor circularity in the exponential-decrease aside; central toric-chaos claims are direct numerical observations.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Main text, section on fractions of tori and chaos (around Fig. 1), and Footnote 33]
    "As a simple rough estimate, let us assume that such locking occurs with a certain probability, p. Then, the probability that no locking occurs is estimated as (1 −p)^N. This gives a rudimentary understanding of why the fraction of N-dimensional tori decreases exponentially [33]. ... Accordingly, the decrease of T_N and T_0 can be fitted by p≃0.36 for a=0.7 and p≃0.49 for a=0.8."

    The parameter p is not independently derived or measured; it is fit to the same quantities T_N and T_0 whose exponential decrease it is then invoked to explain. The expressions (1-p)^N and p^N therefore track the data by construction, so the agreement is a restatement of the fit rather than an independent test of the proposed mode-locking mechanism. This is a minor, non-load-bearing circularity: the toric-chaos definition, the O(N) null-exponent observation, the Lyapunov-dimension scaling, and the 1/f spectra do not depend on p.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained numerical observation. The paper defines toric chaos as chaos with M null (or near-null) Lyapunov exponents, counts M from finite-time Lyapunov spectra with an explicit threshold in footnote 32, and then reports that M grows linearly with N, that Y2 decays roughly as D_L^{-1/3}, and that the first Lyapunov vector shows 1/f^{3/2} slow dynamics. These are direct measurements from the model, not outputs of a fitted model, and no parameter is adjusted to force the scaling. The only fitted parameter, p, appears in an aside about the exponential rarity of N-dimensional tori and is fit to the very fractions it is used to explain; however, this does not support any of the paper's central claims. Self-citations to Kaneko's earlier work on torus fractalization and chaotic itinerancy are contextual rather than load-bearing: they are cited as related phenomena, not invoked as uniqueness theorems or to forbid alternatives. Footnote 32's asymmetric zero-exponent threshold is a finite-time numerical convention and a robustness concern, but it is not a circular derivation: the claim that M scales with N is an empirical statement about the measured spectra, not a logical consequence of the threshold alone. Overall, the paper's main findings are not circular, and the only circularity is a minor, non-essential explanatory fit.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger shows that the central toric-chaos claim relies mostly on direct numerical observation plus standard Lyapunov theory; the only tailored input is the zero-exponent threshold and an ad hoc constant-locking-probability estimate for the exponential decay.

free parameters (4)
  • locking probability p = p ~ 0.36 (a=0.7), p ~ 0.49 (a=0.8)
    The authors fit p to the numerically observed fractions of T_N and T_0 in footnote 33, then use (1-p)^N as a rough explanation of the same exponential decay.
  • Y2 scaling exponent alpha = alpha ~ 1/3
    The value alpha ~ 1/3 is obtained by fitting the inverse participation ratio against Lyapunov dimension in Fig. 2(b); it supports the claim of partial delocalization.
  • 1/f spectral exponent nu = nu ~ 3/2
    The value nu ~ 3/2 is fitted to the power spectrum of the first Lyapunov vector in Fig. 2(c); it supports the claim of slow itinerant motion.
  • zero-Lyapunov threshold = lambda in (-1e-5, 1e-4) treated as zero
    The criterion in footnote 32 is chosen by hand; every count M of null exponents and hence the torus dimension depends on it.
assumptions (3)
  • standard math Oseledets theorem and the identification of zero Lyapunov exponents with neutral torus directions.
    The paper classifies attractors as tori or toric chaos entirely from numerically computed Lyapunov spectra; this identification is standard but unproved for this specific map.
  • domain assumption Equation (1) with Jij=b and f=sin(2*pi*x_j) is representative; conclusions are qualitatively independent of coupling form.
    Stated in footnote 28 and near the end; only two coupling variants are tested in the Supplemental Material, so this is an assumption of generality.
  • ad hoc to paper Each added mode locks with a constant probability p independent of N and of previous lockings.
    The rough estimate (1-p)^N for the exponential decay of T_N in Section II assumes this; p is then fitted to the data in footnote 33.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chaos on a High-Dimensional Torus." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/46LNOIMF

@misc{pith2026190806617,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chaos on a High-Dimensional Torus},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/46LNOIMF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06617}
}
abstract

Transition from quasiperiodicity with many frequencies (i.e., a high-dimensional torus) to chaos is studied by using $N$-dimensional globally coupled circle maps. First, the existence of $N$-dimensional tori with $N\geq 2$ is confirmed while they become exponentially rare with $N$. Besides, chaos exists even when the map is invertible, and such chaos has more null Lyapunov exponents as $N$ increases. This unusual form of "chaos on a torus," termed toric chaos, exhibits delocalization and slow dynamics of the first Lyapunov vector. Fractalization of tori at the transition to chaos is also suggested. The relevance of toric chaos to neural dynamics and turbulence is discussed in relation to chaotic itinerancy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.06617 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Fractions of tori and chaos in map (1) over a random choice of natural frequencies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Bifurcation in map (1) with the change of coupling constant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Berge, Y

    P. Berge, Y. Pomeau, and C. Vidal, The Order in Chaos (Wiley, New York, 1984)

  2. [2]

    Ott, Chaos in dynamical systems (Cambridge univer- sity press, Cambridge, 2002)

    E. Ott, Chaos in dynamical systems (Cambridge univer- sity press, Cambridge, 2002)

  3. [3]

    Cencini, F

    M. Cencini, F. Cecconi, and A. Vulpiani, Chaos: from simple models to complex systems (World Scientific, Sin- gapore, 2009)

  4. [4]

    Kaneko, Collapse of Tori and Genesis of Chaos in Dissipative Systems (World Scientific, Singapore, 1986)

    K. Kaneko, Collapse of Tori and Genesis of Chaos in Dissipative Systems (World Scientific, Singapore, 1986)

  5. [5]

    Kuramoto, Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbu- lence (Springer, Berlin, 1984)

    Y. Kuramoto, Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbu- lence (Springer, Berlin, 1984)

  6. [6]

    Stavans, Experimental study of quasiperiodicity in a hydrodynamical system, Phys

    J. Stavans, Experimental study of quasiperiodicity in a hydrodynamical system, Phys. Rev. A 35, 4314 (1987)

  7. [7]

    J. P. Gollub and S. V. Benson, Many routes to turbulent convection, J. Fluid Mech. 100, 449 (1980); A. Libch- aber, S. Fauve and C. Laroche, Two-parameter study of the routes to chaos, Physica D 7, 73 (1983)

  8. [8]

    H. G. Winful, Y. C. Chen, and J. M. Liu, Frequency locking, quasiperiodicity, and chaos in modulated self- pulsing semiconductor lasers, Appl. Phys. Lett. 48, 616 (1986); D. Merbach, O. Hess, H. Herzel, and E. Sch¨ oll, Injection-induced bifurcations of transverse spatiotempo- ral patterns in semiconductor laser arrays, Phys. Rev. E 52, 1571 (1995)

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Cumming and P

    A. Cumming and P. S. Linsay, Quasiperiodicity and Chaos in a System with Three Competing Frequencies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2719 (1988)

  2. [10]

    M. R. Bassett and J. L. Hudson, Quasiperiodicity and chaos during an electrochemical reaction, J. Phys. Chem. 93, 2731 (1989); T. Hauck and F. W. Schneider, Mixed- mode and quasiperiodic oscillations in the peroxidase- oxidase reaction, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 391 (1993)

  3. [11]

    Glass and M

    L. Glass and M. C. MacKey, From Clocks to Chaos: The Rhythms of Life (Princeton University Press, 1988); L. Glass, Cardiac arrhythmias and circle maps—A classi- cal problem, Chaos 1, 13 (1991); A. Garfinkel, et al., Quasiperiodicity and chaos in cardiac fibrillation, J. Clin. In...

  4. [12]

    A. J. Mandell and K. A. Selz, Is the EEG a strange at- tractor? Brain stem neuronal discharge patterns and electroencephalographic rhythms, The impact of chaos on science and society , 64-96 (United Nations University Press, 1997)

  5. [13]

    J. P. Eckmann, Roads to Turbulence in Dissipative Dy- namical Systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 53, 643 (1981)

  6. [14]

    M. J. Feigenbaum, The universal metric properties of nonlinear transformations, J. Stat. Phys. 21, 669 (1979)

  7. [15]

    Pomeau and P

    Y. Pomeau and P. Manneville, Intermittent transition to turbulence in dissipative dynamical systems, Commun. Math. Phys. 74, 189 (1980)

  8. [16]

    M. J. Feigenbaum, L. P. Kadanoff, and S. J. Shenker, Quasiperiodicity in dissipative systems: a renormaliza- tion group analysis, Physica D 5, 370 (1982)

  9. [17]

    D. Rand, S. Ostlund, J. Sethna, and E. D. Siggia, Univer- sal transition from quasiperiodicity to chaos in dissipative systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 132 (1982)

  10. [18]

    A.Glazier and A

    J. A.Glazier and A. Libchaber, Quasi-periodicity and dynamical systems: An experimentalist’s view. IEEE Trans. Circ. Sys. 35, 790 (1988)

  11. [19]

    toric chaos

    are uncovered in regard to two-dimensional tori. Transition from a torus with more than two frequen- cies to chaos, in contrast, is not fully explored, in spite of its historical significance in the investigation of fluid turbulence. Landau proposed to understand turbulence as (...

  12. [20]

    Kaneko, On the Period-Adding Phenomena at the Fre- quency Locking in a One-Dimensional Mapping, Prog

    K. Kaneko, On the Period-Adding Phenomena at the Fre- quency Locking in a One-Dimensional Mapping, Prog. Theor. Phys. 68, 669 (1982); Similarity Structure and Scaling Property of the Period-Adding Phenomena, Prog. Theor. Phys. 69, 403 (1983)

  13. [21]

    L. D. Landau, On the problem of turbulence, C. R. Acad. Sci. USSR 44, 311 (1944); L. D. Landau and E. M. Lif- shitz, Fluid Mechanics (Pergamon, London, 1959)

  14. [22]

    On the nature of turbulence,

    D. Ruelle and F. Takens, On the nature of turbulence, Commun. Math. Phys. 20, 167 (1971); Note concern- ing our paper “On the nature of turbulence,” Commun. Math. Phys. 23, 343 (1971)

  15. [23]

    Newhouse, D

    S. Newhouse, D. Ruelle, and F. Takens, Occurrence of strange Axiom A attractors near quasi periodic flows on T m, m≥ 3, Commun. Math. Phys. 64, 35 (1978)

  16. [24]

    Turaev, Maps Close to Identity and Universal Maps in the Newhouse Domain, Commun

    D. Turaev, Maps Close to Identity and Universal Maps in the Newhouse Domain, Commun. Math. Phys. 335, 1235 (2015)

  17. [25]

    Grebogi, E

    C. Grebogi, E. Ott, and J. A. Yorke, Are three-frequency quasiperiodic orbits to be expected in typical nonlinear dynamical systems?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 339 (1983); Attractors on an N-torus: Quasiperiodicity versus chaos. Physica D 15, 354 (1985)

  18. [26]

    Kaneko, Fates of Three-Torus I – Double Devil’s Stair- cases in Lockings, Prog

    K. Kaneko, Fates of Three-Torus I – Double Devil’s Stair- cases in Lockings, Prog. Theor. Phys. 71, 282 (1984)

  19. [27]

    Baesens, J

    C. Baesens, J. Guckenheimer, S. Kim, and R. S. MacKay, Three coupled oscillators: mode-locking, global bifurca- tions and toroidal chaos, Physica D 49, 387 (1991)

  20. [28]

    (1) is regarded as 0 with N = 1

    The last term in Eq. (1) is regarded as 0 with N = 1

  21. [29]

    Similar results are reproduced when the coupling con- stants, Jij, are heterogeneous (i.e., dependent on i,j ) and randomly chosen, or when the interaction is given by f (xi(t),x j(t)) = sin(2π(xi(t)−xj(t)) like the Kuramoto model [5] (Supplemental Material [29], Sec. S1)

  22. [30]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for complete locking, the relationships between the torus dimensionM and Lyapunov dimensionDL, and the results with different models and parameters

  23. [31]

    K. Kaneko, Clustering, Coding, Switching, Hierarchical Ordering, and Control in Network of Chaotic Elements, Physica D 41, 137 (1990); Globally Coupled Circle Maps, Physica D 54, 5 (1991)

  24. [32]

    For N = 2, 3, 4, ac is calculated as ac(2,b ) = 1/(1 +b), ac(3,b ) = ( √ 4 + 4b′− 7b′2−b′)/(2 + 2b′− 4b′2), and ac(4,b ) = ( √ 1 + 2b′− 2b′2−b′)/(1 + 2b′− 3b′2), with b′≡b/(N− 1)

  25. [33]

    The Lyapunov exponent is regarded as zero if its value is less than 10−4 and larger than−1× 10−5

  26. [34]

    Accordingly, the decrease ofT N andT 0 can be fitted byp≃ 0.36 for a = 0.7 and p≃ 0.49 for a = 0.8 [see also Supplemental Material [29], Fig

    This rough estimate also suggests that the fraction of complete locking, T 0, decreases exponentially with N as pN. Accordingly, the decrease ofT N andT 0 can be fitted byp≃ 0.36 for a = 0.7 and p≃ 0.49 for a = 0.8 [see also Supplemental Material [29], Fig. S1(a)]

  27. [35]

    D. J. Thouless, Electrons in disordered systems and the theory of localization, Phys. Rep. 13, 93 (1974); A. D. Mirlin, Fluctuations of the inverse participation ratio at the Anderson transition, Phys. Rep. 326, 259 (2000); K. A. Takeuchi, F. Ginelli, and H. Chat´ e, Lyapunov ...

  28. [36]

    Kaneko, Lyapunov Analysis and Information Flow in Coupled Map Lattices, Physica D 23, 436 (1986)

    K. Kaneko, Lyapunov Analysis and Information Flow in Coupled Map Lattices, Physica D 23, 436 (1986). 6

  29. [37]

    S2); note there exist ∼0.1N positive Lyapunov exponents, here

    In the invertible regime, DL ≃ M + 0.3N holds (see Supplemental Material [29], Fig. S2); note there exist ∼0.1N positive Lyapunov exponents, here. To satisfy∑⌈DL⌉ j=1 λj≤ 0, negative exponents of the same order are needed to cancel the positive sum, which may explain the above...

  30. [38]

    In the case with N = 2 where toric chaos cannot emerge, torus attractors with non-integer dimensions cannot be found (see Supplemental Material [29], Fig. S6)

  31. [39]

    Grebogi, E

    C. Grebogi, E. Ott, S. Pelikan, and J. A. Yorke, Strange attractors that are not chaotic, Physica D13, 261 (1984)

  32. [40]

    Feudel, S

    U. Feudel, S. Kuznetsov, and A. Pikovsky, Strange Non- chaotic Attractors: Dynamics Between Order and Chaos in Quasiperiodically Forced Systems (World Scientific, Singapore, 2006)

  33. [41]

    Kaneko, Fractalization of Torus, Prog

    K. Kaneko, Fractalization of Torus, Prog. Theor. Phys. 71, 1112 (1984); T. Nishikawa and K. Kaneko, Fractal- ization of a torus as a strange nonchaotic attractor, Phys. Rev. E 54, 6114 (1996)

  34. [42]

    Kaneko and I

    K. Kaneko and I. Tsuda, Chaos and Beyond: A Con- structive Approach With Applications in Life Sciences (Springer, Berlin, 2001); Chaotic Itinerancy, Chaos 13, 926 (2003)

  35. [43]

    Kaneko, Information cascade with marginal stabil- ity in network of chaotic elements, Physica D 77, 456, (1994)

    K. Kaneko, Information cascade with marginal stabil- ity in network of chaotic elements, Physica D 77, 456, (1994)

  36. [44]

    Tsuda, Chaotic itinerancy as a dynamical basis of hermeneutics in brain and mind, World Futures 32, 167 (1991)

    I. Tsuda, Chaotic itinerancy as a dynamical basis of hermeneutics in brain and mind, World Futures 32, 167 (1991)

  37. [45]

    L. Kay, L. R. Lancaster, and W. J. Freeman, Comparison of EEG time series from rat olfactory system with model composed of nonlinear coupled oscillators, Int. J. Bifur. Chaos 5, 849 (1995)

  38. [46]

    Kay, A challenge to chaotic itinerancy from brain dy- namics, Chaos 13, 1057 (2003)

    L. Kay, A challenge to chaotic itinerancy from brain dy- namics, Chaos 13, 1057 (2003)

  39. [47]

    W. J. Freeman, Simulation of chaotic EEG patterns with a dynamic model of the olfactory system, Biol. Cybern. 56, 139 (1987); Evidence from human scalp electroen- cephalograms of global chaotic itinerancy, Chaos 13, 1067 (2003)

  40. [48]

    Herrero, F

    R. Herrero, F. Pi, J. Rius, and G. Orriols, About the oscillatory possibilities of the dynamical systems, Physica D 241, 1358 (2012); R. Herrero, J. Farjas, F. Pi, and G. Orriols, Nonlinear oscillatory mixing in the generalized Landau scenario, Phys. Rev. E 97, 052218, (2018)....

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.