Thumbnails for Data Stories: A Survey of Current Practices

Bum Chul Kwon; Hwiyeon Kim; Juyoung Oh; Matthew Brehmer; Sungahn Ko; Yunha Han

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 37 references

Thumbnails for Data Stories: A Survey of Current Practices

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Visualization thumbnails in data journalism are designed without shared, evidence-based guidelines, and this paper maps the resulting design space.

desk verdict A useful first survey of a genuinely unstudied design space, but the 'design strategies' framing overstates what can be inferred from thumbnails whose provenance (human vs automated) is never checked. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06922 v1 pith:ABLVESFC submitted 2019-08-19 cs.HC cs.GR

Hwiyeon Kim , Juyoung Oh , Yunha Han , Sungahn Ko , Matthew Brehmer , Bum Chul Kwon This is my paper · ORCID

classification cs.HCcs.GR

keywords visualizationthumbnailsdatajournalismchartdesignthumbnailspacenewsgraphicscomponentssurveystories

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks what current practice looks like when a data-journalism article is condensed into a small clickable thumbnail. By coding 67 visualization thumbnails collected from eight news outlets and interviewing six news graphics practitioners, the authors establish that there is no shared, evidence-based set of rules for this task: outlets crop, resize, or modify charts in widely different ways, omitting axes and titles or adding highlights, explanatory text, logos, and context graphics. They also show that existing taxonomies of chart components do not capture thumbnail-specific design choices, and they propose a working classification of 14 basic and 4 added component types plus a working definition of a visualization thumbnail. The point of the paper is that this design space is open and understudied, so structured guidance and automated thumbnail generation are not yet possible.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is a two-part classification of visualization thumbnails. The first part distinguishes 14 basic chart components, such as axes, tick marks, labels, titles, data labels, and explicit versus implicit legends, from 4 added components: explanation text, highlights, human recognizable objects (HROs), and graphics not relevant to data (GNRDs). The second part classifies how a thumbnail was produced from the article's chart: modified, cropped, or resized. This taxonomy does the work of turning informal thumbnail examples into comparable evidence, and together with the practitioner conversations it grounds the claim that no shared, evidence-based design rules exist.

What would settle it

A replication survey spanning a larger random sample of outlets, topics, and time periods would settle generalizability: if thumbnail component choices cluster into a few stable patterns rather than the wide variability reported here, the uncharted-space conclusion would not hold. A second test would apply the proposed taxonomy with new coders; if agreement falls far below the reported $\kappa = 0.75$, the taxonomy itself would not be a stable measurement instrument.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that visualization thumbnails in data journalism form an uncharted design space with no consensus guidelines and little empirical support. Concretely, of 67 basic-chart thumbnails, 39 reused a chart from the article by resizing or cropping it and 28 modified the chart by removing or adding components; line-chart thumbnails commonly omit axes and titles while adding highlights and explanation text, while different organizations adopt opposite strategies, some stripping charts nearly bare and others cropping or resizing only. The authors further claim that existing component classifications are insufficient, so they extend them into a thumbnail-specific taxonomy and report 96% coder agreement (Fleiss' $\kappa = 0.75$). Conversations with six practitioners reinforce the lack of hard-and-fast rules and reveal competing goals: designers want attention, branding, and aesthetics, while readers need fast, accurate judgments about whether the article matches their interests. The paper's contribution is framing this as a research problem and proposing a vocabulary and a working definition for studying it.

Load-bearing premise

The survey's findings rest on the assumption that the 67 thumbnails collected from eight news outlets over a two-month period, limited to politics and economics articles, are representative of visualization thumbnail practice in data journalism.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If no shared guidelines exist, designers currently make thumbnail choices without empirical support, and different news organizations will continue to follow visibly different strategies.
The proposed taxonomy of components and editing strategies can serve as a shared vocabulary for comparing thumbnails across outlets and for future experiments.
Producer goals such as attracting clicks and reinforcing brand and reader goals such as quick, accurate judgment may conflict, so finding a trade-off point becomes a concrete research target.
Because current automatic thumbnail methods were built for generic images, visualization-specific automatic generation or recommendation cannot be grounded until the design space is studied empirically.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If a thumbnail is often the only exposure a reader has to a chart, cropping or omitting axes could mislead factual understanding; a testable extension is measuring miscomprehension from thumbnails alone.
The same taxonomy could be applied to other compressed chart contexts, such as social media cards, search result previews, and mobile notifications, where similar design decisions are made without guidelines.
The practitioners' reported emphasis on brand and aesthetics suggests that organizational culture, rather than reader needs, may be driving thumbnail choices; this implicit hypothesis could be tested by comparing outlets with strong brand guidelines against those with looser practices.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's the short version: this is a legitimate first pass at a genuinely unexamined corner of data journalism—what happens to charts when they get shrunk into social-media thumbnails—and the taxonomy of components (14 basic, 4 added) is a usable vocabulary for future work. The survey's coding is careful and reasonably reliable (Kappa=0.75), and the authors share their data. That's real value.

The soft spot is the inference from observed thumbnails to 'design strategies.' The paper codes 67 thumbnails as modified/cropped/resized and reads that as evidence about what news organizations prefer. But nowhere do they verify that a human chose those crops. Many CMS pipelines derive social thumbnails automatically from lead images with fixed rules; in that case, 'omitting the y-axis' is a rendering default, not a design decision. The stress-test note is right about this. The practitioner conversations independently suggest there are no shared guidelines, so the broad claim of an 'uncharted design space' survives. But Tables 1–2 overstate what they demonstrate. The authors should either trace provenance for at least a sample of thumbnails or soften the language from 'strategies' to 'observed practices.'

Also minor: the sample is two months, politics/economics only, and the taxonomy is ad hoc—though inter-coder agreement helps. The paper freely calls its definition a working definition, so this is acceptable for an exploratory study, but the scope limits generalizability more than the text sometimes implies.

Who's this for? People working on data journalism, visualization for social media, or automated thumbnail generation. They'll find the taxonomy and the documented variance useful. I'd send it to serious peer review; it's not a heavy result, but it's a serviceable foundation, and the authors are appropriately cautious in the conclusions. My recommendation: accept with minor revisions that reframe the claims about design intent and explicitly acknowledge the provenance limitation.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper surveys current practices in visualization thumbnail design in data journalism. The authors collected 67 visualization thumbnails from eight news outlets over a two-month period (November–December 2018) in politics and economics, coded them for chart component modifications (removed/added/remained) and editing type (modified/cropped/resized), and conducted informal conversations with six practitioners. The paper reports considerable variability in thumbnail compositions, identifies a lack of consensus on design guidelines, and proposes a working definition of visualization thumbnails. It concludes that the design space is largely uncharted and calls for further empirical study.

Significance. If the claims hold, this is a useful first step in an understudied area. The paper's strengths include its grounding in real-world examples, the use of multiple coders with substantial inter-rater agreement (Fleiss' Kappa = 0.75), the practitioner insights, and the interactive supplement to Table 1. The finding that practitioners report 'no hard and fast rules' is credible. However, the survey's interpretation as evidence of deliberate 'design strategies' is not yet supported by provenance data, and the sample is limited. The paper's value as an exploratory descriptive study is clear, but its central conclusion about the state of design practice needs either more evidence or more cautious framing.

major comments (4)

[Section 3.1, Table 1] The paper treats differences between thumbnails and their in-article visualizations as intentional design choices (e.g., 'modified,' 'cropped,' 'omitted axes'). However, it never establishes that a human designer made these changes. Automatic thumbnail generation by CMS platforms is a common practice (cited in §2.1), and §3.2 itself notes that thumbnails are often delegated to social media producers rather than the article's visualization designer. Without traceability checks linking each sampled thumbnail to a design decision, the coding cannot support claims about 'design strategies' or 'current practices' in the intentional sense. This is load-bearing for the paper's central claim of an uncharted design space.
[Section 3.1] The sampling procedure is under-specified. The paper does not explain how the initial 139 articles were identified or retrieved (e.g., RSS feeds, sitemaps, manual browsing), nor the exact inclusion/exclusion criteria beyond topic and date. For instance, the exclusion of 24 articles due to 'sparingly/infrequently used' charts is vague. Without a clear sampling frame, the representativeness of the 67 thumbnails cannot be assessed, which weakens the ability to generalize from the survey.
[Section 3.1] The sample is limited to two months (November–December 2018), two topics (politics and economics), and eight outlets, yielding 67 thumbnails. The paper does not quantitatively assess generalizability or acknowledge this as a limitation in the conclusions. The claim that these results reveal 'current practices' is stronger than the evidence warrants; a limitations paragraph is needed.
[Section 3.1] The new classification scheme is constructed ad hoc by the authors, combining and extending previous taxonomies. While Fleiss' Kappa=0.75 demonstrates inter-coder reliability, the validity of the categories themselves (e.g., distinguishing implicit/explicit legends, GNRDs) is not externally assessed. The paper should either validate the taxonomy with independent experts or discuss the risk that the coding scheme may not capture the dimensions that matter for thumbnail effectiveness.

minor comments (6)

[Section 3.1] 'frequently used in news media' is a dangling modifier; rephrase to 'which are frequently used in news media.' Also define 'sparingly/infrequently used' more precisely.
[References] Reference [6] contains a formatting artifact: 'V o' should be 'Vo' (no space between V and o), likely from PDF extraction; please correct.
[Table 1] Table 1 is extremely dense in the printed version; the interactive version is helpful, but consider adding a note in the caption on how to read the table.
[Section 3.1] The abbreviation 'First Tuesday Journal (1st)' is introduced in §3.1 but the table uses 'FTJ' in the header; please make the abbreviation usage consistent.
[Section 3.2] The finding that some practitioners avoid visualization in thumbnails because they are 'cold, intimidating, or inaccessible' is interesting, but the tension with the prevalence of visualization thumbnails in the survey is not discussed. A sentence connecting these observations would strengthen the paper.
[Section 3.1] The paper reports '96% agreement' alongside Fleiss' Kappa=0.75; it would help to specify how the percentage agreement was computed, as these two metrics often diverge.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the survey findings are empirical, coded from collected thumbnails and practitioner interviews, and do not reduce to their own inputs.

full rationale

This paper is an empirical survey rather than a derivation chain. Its central claims—that visualization thumbnails exhibit a wide range of modifications (Table 1), that editing strategies differ across outlets, and that practitioners report no consensus—are supported directly by coded observations of 67 collected thumbnails and by six practitioner conversations, not by fitting a model to data or by invoking the authors' prior results. The taxonomy is introduced after considering existing classifications (Borkin, Byrne, Ren) and is presented as a working coding scheme with inter-coder agreement (Fleiss' Kappa = 0.75); it is not used to derive the conclusion by definition. The only author self-citations in the reference list (Amini/Brehmer; Ren/Brehmer) are background or taxonomy-informing sources and do not carry the argument. The skeptic concern that thumbnails may have been automatically cropped by CMS pipelines is a threat to construct validity or generalizability, not a circularity: the paper's inference would be weakened, but it would not reduce to its own inputs. No load-bearing circular step was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numerical fitting or derived constants are involved. The assumptions are domain-related: representativeness of the sample, validity of the ad hoc taxonomy, and the informativeness of informal interviews. The conceptual categories (HRO, GNRD) are analytical labels adapted from prior literature, not new physical entities.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The 67 thumbnails surveyed are representative of visualization thumbnail practices in data journalism.
The sample is drawn from 8 news outlets over Nov 1 to Dec 31, 2018, limited to politics and economics. The paper does not assess generalizability.
domain assumption The new classification scheme (14 basic + 4 added component types) reliably captures design choices relevant to thumbnails.
The scheme was created by combining existing classifications, and inter-rater reliability was assessed only within this study (Fleiss' Kappa=0.75). No external validation.
domain assumption Informal conversations with six practitioners are representative of industry perspectives.
The paper admits the conversations were informal and from the authors' extended networks, not a systematic sample.
domain assumption The working definition of a visualization thumbnail is appropriate.
The paper states this is a working definition that could evolve.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Thumbnails for Data Stories: A Survey of Current Practices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ABLVESFC

@misc{pith2026190806922,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Thumbnails for Data Stories: A Survey of Current Practices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ABLVESFC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06922}
}

read the original abstract

When people browse online news, small thumbnail images accompanying links to articles attract their attention and help them to decide which articles to read. As an increasing proportion of online news can be construed as data journalism, we have witnessed a corresponding increase in the incorporation of visualization in article thumbnails. However, there is little research to support alternative design choices for visualization thumbnails, which include resizing, cropping, simplifying, and embellishing charts appearing within the body of the associated article. We therefore sought to better understand these design choices and determine what makes a visualization thumbnail inviting and interpretable. This paper presents our findings from a survey of visualization thumbnails collected online and from conversations with data journalists and news graphics designers. Our study reveals that there exists an uncharted design space, one that is in need of further empirical study. Our work can thus be seen as a first step toward providing structured guidance on how to design thumbnails for data stories.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.06922 by the authors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

[1]

Amini, M

F. Amini, M. Brehmer, G. Bolduan, C. Elmer, and B. Wiederkehr. Eval- uating data-driven stories & storytelling tools. In N. H. Riche, C. Hurter, N. Diakopoulos, and S. Carpendale, eds., Data-Driven Storytelling. A K Peters/CRC Press, 2018

work page 2018
[2]

A. Aula, R. M. Khan, Z. Guan, P. Fontes, and P. Hong. A comparison of visual and textual page previews in judging the helpfulness of web pages. In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 51–60, 2010

work page 2010
[3]

Bateman, R

S. Bateman, R. L. Mandryk, C. Gutwin, A. Genest, D. McDine, and C. A. Brooks. Useful junk?: the effects of visual embellishment on comprehension and memorability of charts. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2573–2582, 2010

work page 2010
[4]

Borgo, A

R. Borgo, A. Abdul-Rahman, F. Mohamed, P. W. Grant, I. Reppa, L. Floridi, and M. Chen. An empirical study on using visual embel- lishments in visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(12):2759–2768, 2012

work page 2012
[5]

M. A. Borkin, Z. Bylinskii, N. W. Kim, C. M. Bainbridge, C. S. Yeh, D. Borkin, H. Pﬁster, and A. Oliva. Beyond memorability: Visualiza- tion recognition and recall. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 22(1), 2016

work page 2016
[6]

M. A. Borkin, A. A. V o, Z. Bylinskii, P. Isola, S. Sunkavalli, A. Oliva, and H. Pﬁster. What makes a visualization memorable? IEEE Trans- actions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(12):2306–2315, 2013

work page 2013
[7]

Byrne, D

L. Byrne, D. Angus, and J. Wiles. Acquired codes of meaning in data visualization and infographics: Beyond perceptual primitives. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph, 22(1):509–518, 2016. 4 To appear in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

work page 2016
[8]

Cawthon and A

N. Cawthon and A. V . Moere. The effect of aesthetic on the usability of data visualization. In 2007 11th International Conference Information Visualization (IV’07), pp. 637–648. IEEE, 2007

work page 2007

Show all 37 references

[9]

Cockburn, C

A. Cockburn, C. Gutwin, and J. Alexander. Faster document naviga- tion with space-ﬁlling thumbnails. In Proceedings fo the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–10, 2006

2006
[10]

Dziadosz, Susan and Chandrasekar, Raman. Do thumbnail previews help users make better relevance decisions about web search results? In Proceedings of the Annual International SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 365–366, 2002

2002
[11]

Haroz, R

S. Haroz, R. Kosara, and S. L. Franconeri. Isotype visualization: Working memory, performance, and engagement with pictographs. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1191–1200. ACM, 2015

2015
[12]

Harrison, K

L. Harrison, K. Reinecke, and R. Chang. Infographic aesthetics: De- signing for the ﬁrst impression. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1187–1190, 2015

2015
[13]

J. Heer, J. D. Mackinlay, C. Stolte, and M. Agrawala. Graphical histo- ries for visualization: Supporting analysis, communication, and eval- uation. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 14(6):1189–1196, 2008

2008
[14]

Hullman, E

J. Hullman, E. Adar, and P. Shah. Beneﬁtting infovis with visual difﬁ- culties. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12):2213–2222, 2011

2011
[15]

Kaasten, S

S. Kaasten, S. Greenberg, and C. Edwards. How people recognise previously seen web pages from titles, URLs and thumbnails. In Proceedings of the HCI Conference on People and Computers XVI, pp. 247–266, 2002

2002
[16]

H.-K. Kong, Z. Liu, and K. Karahalios. Frames and slants in titles of visualizations on controversial topics. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, p. 438. ACM, 2018

2018
[17]

Kong and M

N. Kong and M. Agrawala. Graphical overlays: Using layered elements to aid chart reading. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(12):2631–2638, 2012

2012
[18]

R. Kosara. Presentation-oriented visualization techniques. IEEE com- puter graphics and applications, 36(1):80–85, 2016

2016
[19]

Lam and P

H. Lam and P. Baudisch. Summary thumbnails: readable overviews for small screen web browsers. InProceedings of the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 681–690, 2005

2005
[20]

L. A. Leiva, V . J. Traver, and V . Castell´o. Livethumbs: a visual aid for web page revisitation. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1797–1802, 2013

2013
[21]

Z. Li, S. Shi, and L. Zhang. Improving relevance judgment of web search results with image excerpts. In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 21–30, 2008

2008
[22]

Matejka, T

J. Matejka, T. Grossman, and G. W. Fitzmaurice. Swifter: improved on- line video scrubbing. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1159–1168, 2013

2013
[23]

A. V . Moere and H. Purchase. On the role of design in information visualization. Information Visualization, 10(4):356–371, 2011

2011
[24]

A. V . Moere, M. Tomitsch, C. Wimmer, B. Christoph, and T. Grechenig. Evaluating the effect of style in information visualization. IEEE Trans- actions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(12):2739–2748, 2012

2012
[25]

P. H. Nguyen, K. X. 0003, A. Bardill, B. Salman, K. Herd, and B. L. W. Wong. Sensemap: Supporting browser-based online sensemaking through analytic provenance. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, pp. 91–100, 2016

2016
[26]

A. V . Pandey, K. Rall, M. L. Satterthwaite, O. Nov, and E. Bertini. How deceptive are deceptive visualizations?: An empirical analysis of common distortion techniques. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1469–1478. ACM, 2015

2015
[27]

D. Ren, M. Brehmer, B. Lee, T. H¨ollerer, and E. K. Choe. Chartaccent: Annotation for data-driven storytelling. In Proceedings of IEEE Paciﬁc Visualization Symposium, pp. 230–239, 2017

2017
[28]

N. H. Riche, C. Hurter, N. Diakopoulos, and S. Carpendale. Data- Driven Storytelling. CRC Press, 2018

2018
[29]

Robertson, M

G. Robertson, M. Czerwinski, K. Larson, Robbins, D. C., D. Thiel, and van Dantzich, Maarten. Data mountain: Using spatial memory for document management. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 153–162, 1998

1998
[30]

D. Skau, L. Harrison, and R. Kosara. An evaluation of the impact of visual embellishments in bar charts. Computer Graphics Forum, 34(3):221–230, 2015

2015
[31]

Y . Song, M. Redi, J. Vallmitjana, and A. Jaimes. To click or not to click: Automatic selection of beautiful thumbnails from videos. CoRR, abs/1609.01388, 2016

2016 arXiv
[32]

C. D. Stolper, B. Lee, N. Henry Riche, and J. Stasko. Data-driven sto- rytelling techniques: Analysis of a curated collection of visual stories. In N. Henry Riche, C. Hurter, N. Diakopoulos, and S. Carpendale, eds., Data-Driven Storytelling. A K Peters/CRC Press, 2018

2018
[33]

B. Suh, H. Ling, B. B. Bederson, and D. W. Jacobs. Automatic thumb- nail cropping and its effectiveness. In Proceedings of the ACM Sympo- sium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 95–104, 2003

2003
[34]

Teevan, E

J. Teevan, E. Cutrell, D. Fisher, S. M. Drucker, G. Ramos, P. Andr´e, and C. Hu. Visual snippets: summarizing web pages for search and revisitation. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2023–2032, 2009

2023
[35]

Topkara, S

M. Topkara, S. Pan, J. C. Lai, A. Dirik, S. Wood, and J. Boston. ”you’ve got video”: increasing clickthrough when sharing enterprise video with email. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 565–568, 2012

2012
[36]

Woodruff, A

A. Woodruff, A. Faulring, R. Rosenholtz, J. Morrison, and P. Pirolli. Using thumbnails to search the web. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 198–205, 2001

2001
[37]

Yoghourdjian, T

V . Yoghourdjian, T. Dwyer, K. Klein, K. Marriott, and M. Wybrow. Graph thumbnails: Identifying and comparing multiple graphs at a glance. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(12):3081–3095, 2018. 5

2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Amini, M

F. Amini, M. Brehmer, G. Bolduan, C. Elmer, and B. Wiederkehr. Eval- uating data-driven stories & storytelling tools. In N. H. Riche, C. Hurter, N. Diakopoulos, and S. Carpendale, eds., Data-Driven Storytelling. A K Peters/CRC Press, 2018

work page 2018

[2] [2]

A. Aula, R. M. Khan, Z. Guan, P. Fontes, and P. Hong. A comparison of visual and textual page previews in judging the helpfulness of web pages. In Proceedings of the International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 51–60, 2010

work page 2010

[3] [3]

Bateman, R

S. Bateman, R. L. Mandryk, C. Gutwin, A. Genest, D. McDine, and C. A. Brooks. Useful junk?: the effects of visual embellishment on comprehension and memorability of charts. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2573–2582, 2010

work page 2010

[4] [4]

Borgo, A

R. Borgo, A. Abdul-Rahman, F. Mohamed, P. W. Grant, I. Reppa, L. Floridi, and M. Chen. An empirical study on using visual embel- lishments in visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(12):2759–2768, 2012

work page 2012

[5] [5]

M. A. Borkin, Z. Bylinskii, N. W. Kim, C. M. Bainbridge, C. S. Yeh, D. Borkin, H. Pﬁster, and A. Oliva. Beyond memorability: Visualiza- tion recognition and recall. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 22(1), 2016

work page 2016

[6] [6]

M. A. Borkin, A. A. V o, Z. Bylinskii, P. Isola, S. Sunkavalli, A. Oliva, and H. Pﬁster. What makes a visualization memorable? IEEE Trans- actions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(12):2306–2315, 2013

work page 2013

[7] [7]

Byrne, D

L. Byrne, D. Angus, and J. Wiles. Acquired codes of meaning in data visualization and infographics: Beyond perceptual primitives. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph, 22(1):509–518, 2016. 4 To appear in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

work page 2016

[8] [8]

Cawthon and A

N. Cawthon and A. V . Moere. The effect of aesthetic on the usability of data visualization. In 2007 11th International Conference Information Visualization (IV’07), pp. 637–648. IEEE, 2007

work page 2007