Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 66 references

Infrared interferometric three-dimensional diagnosis of the atmospheric dynamics of the AGB star R Dor with VLTI/AMBER

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper maps gas velocities at three atmospheric heights of the AGB star R Dor, finding deep layers nearly still while the outer CO layer streams outward at 7–15 km/s, the first resolved view of where an AGB wind accelerates.

desk verdict First multi-height velocity maps for an AGB star; the measurement is likely right, but the acceleration claim outruns the line-formation assumptions. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.06997 v1 pith:P7IQRVW7 submitted 2019-08-19 astro-ph.SR

Keiichi Ohnaka , Gerd Weigelt , Karl-Heinz Hofmann This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords AGBstarsstellarmasslossinfraredinterferometryVLTI/AMBERvelocity-fieldmapsRDordust-drivenwindsatmospheres
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish where and how the stellar wind of an asymptotic giant branch (AGB) star is launched, using the closest such star, R Dor, as the test case. The authors combine very high spectral resolution (8000) with 6.8 milliarcsecond spatial resolution — seven times finer than the star's 51.2 mas disk — to reconstruct images at 309 wavelengths and extract a velocity map over both the stellar surface and the extended atmosphere. Magnesium lines from the deep layers (below about 1.13 stellar radii) and water lines from about 1.5 stellar radii show no motion beyond the 1.7 km/s measurement uncertainty, while the carbon monoxide first-overtone lines from about 1.8 stellar radii show systematic outward motion of 7–15 km/s over a large fraction of the star. The juxtaposition implies strong acceleration of material between about 1.5 and 1.8 stellar radii, the region where dust is known to form, so the authors propose radiation pressure on dust grains as the driver while leaving intermittent ballistic motion from convection or pulsation as an open alternative. If correct, this is the first three-dimensional (two spatial dimensions plus line-of-sight velocity) dynamical picture of an AGB star's atmosphere.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is a height ladder of spectral lines observed simultaneously with VLTI/AMBER between 2.278 and 2.308 μm at spectral resolution 12,000 (binned to 8,000): the Mg line forms below ~1.13 R*, the H2O lines near ~1.5 R*, and the CO first-overtone lines out to ~1.8 R*, so each line tags a different geometrical height in the same snapshot. At each of the 309 wavelength channels, images are reconstructed with the MiRA algorithm using Fourier phases restored from differential-phase measurements and are convolved to the 6.8 mas beam; spatially resolved spectra are then cross-correlated against a hydrostatic MARCS synthetic spectrum to assign a line-of-sight velocity to every position. Comparing the three velocity-field maps turns the line-formation height into a radius-velocity measurement, converting unresolved Doppler information into a resolved acceleration profile.

What would settle it

A velocity-resolved radiative-transfer model of R Dor's 2.3 μm spectrum in which the CO lines form over a broad range of heights reaching into the near-static photosphere would break the height stratification: if such a model reproduces the observed 7–15 km/s blueshifts with no accelerating shell at 1.8 R*, the acceleration claim collapses. Observationally, an epoch of the same interferometric velocity-mapping at a different pulsation phase that shows the outward motion absent while dust at 1.5 R* remains present would demonstrate the motion is intermittent ballistic motion rather than steady wind acceleration.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that R Dor's atmosphere has a sharp kinematic transition with height: layers probed by the Mg line at 2.28164 μm (below ~1.13 R*) and by three H2O lines near 2.28 μm (~1.5 R*) are quiet to within the 1.7 km/s measurement uncertainty, whereas the CO first-overtone lines reveal blueshifted, outward motion at 7–15 km/s over a substantial fraction of the surface and out to ~1.8 R*. Because dust is detected at ~1.5 R*, the authors interpret the velocity jump as strong acceleration in the shell between 1.5 and 1.8 stellar radii, most plausibly caused by radiation pressure on dust grains — though they stress that ballistic motion driven by convection or pulsation, and hence intermittency, cannot yet be excluded. The paper also presents the first resolved images of the extended atmosphere of a non-Mira AGB star and finds a bright surface region with about 25% intensity contrast, qualitatively consistent with three-dimensional convection simulations.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes the Mg, H2O, and CO lines form in thin, nested shells at the claimed heights (below about 1.13, about 1.5, and about 1.8 stellar radii) and that the three velocity maps trace the same outward-accelerating gas; those heights come from the spatial extent of the reconstructed images and earlier literature, not from a radiative-transfer model of R Dor's own atmosphere.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the acceleration is real, the wind-launch zone of R Dor sits between about 1.5 and 1.8 stellar radii, coinciding with the dust-formation radius, which supports dust-driven wind models in which radiation pressure — possibly scattering on composite grains — accelerates the outflow.
  • The measured outward velocities of 7–15 km/s exceed the wind's terminal velocity of about 5.5 km/s reached beyond 20 R*, so the same accelerating flow can explain the high-velocity components seen in submillimeter molecular lines.
  • Spatially unresolved spectroscopy cannot see this outflow at all, because blueshifted CO absorption over the disk is filled in by blueshifted CO emission outside the limb; spatially resolved spectro-interferometry is therefore necessary to diagnose wind acceleration in such stars.
  • The dynamics of R Dor's extended atmosphere (systematic outflow) differ from those of the red supergiant Antares (turbulent clump motion, no systematic outflow), a first observational hint that wind-launching may differ between AGB stars and red supergiants.
  • Since the hydrostatic photosphere extends only to about 1.24 R*, the CO and H2O atmospheres out to 1.5–1.8 R* require a non-hydrostatic mechanism, and finding one in a low-amplitude semiregular variable widens the class of stars that can sustain extended dynamic atmospheres.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If dust radiation pressure drives the acceleration, the fastest outward motion should be spatially matched to the clumpy dust clouds seen in polarimetric imaging; overlaying the CO velocity map on the dust-scattering maps would test this, with the southern 15 km/s region as the natural first target.
  • Filling in the ladder with lines forming near 1.6 R* or including fundamental CO bands could distinguish a sharp acceleration kick between 1.5 and 1.8 R* from a gradual outward rise in velocity — a testable extension of the same method.
  • Because the unresolved spectrum hides the outflow, some AGB stars previously classified as having static outer atmospheres on spectroscopic evidence may harbour undetected accelerating layers; a small survey of nearby AGB stars with the same technique would measure how common such hidden outflows are.
  • Applying the same three-height velocity-mapping to stars spanning different pulsation amplitudes and mass-loss rates would reveal whether dust-driven acceleration is universal or one of several wind-launching modes in evolved cool stars.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper presents VLTI/AMBER spectro-interferometric observations of the AGB star R Dor, reconstructs images at 309 wavelength channels, and derives line-of-sight velocity maps from Mg, H2O, and CO lines. The authors report that the Mg and H2O lines, formed below ~1.5 R*, show little systematic motion, while the CO first-overtone lines show outward motion of 7-15 km/s at ~1.8 R*. They interpret this as strong acceleration of material between ~1.5 and ~1.8 R*, possibly driven by radiation pressure on dust, while acknowledging that the motion could be intermittent or ballistic. This would be the first spatially resolved, multi-height velocity diagnosis of an AGB star.

Significance. If the acceleration claim holds, the paper provides a qualitatively new constraint on the wind-acceleration region of an AGB star, directly complementing dust-formation radii inferred from polarimetry and the lack of outflow seen in ALMA at a later epoch. The observational work is careful: the uv coverage is good, image reconstruction is tested against simulated data with 18 different reconstruction setups, uncertainty maps are derived from the reconstruction scatter plus calibration terms, and the interferometric data are made public in OIFITS format. The main weakness is that the layer-to-layer velocity comparison rests on assumed line-formation heights and on the assumption that the Mg, H2O, and CO lines trace the same accelerating flow; these assumptions are not validated with a radiative-transfer or moving-atmosphere model.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sections 4.1 and 4.3] The assignment of line-formation heights (Mg ≤1.13 R*, H2O ~1.5 R*, CO ~1.8 R*) is based on the spatial extension of the reconstructed images and on the extent of a hydrostatic MARCS model, not on a radiative-transfer model of R Dor. Because the paper itself states in Section 4.3 that the CO lines are optically thick to the extreme limb, the spatially resolved CO spectrum at a given sky position is an opacity-weighted average over a range of radii along the line of sight, not a sample of gas at a single geometric height. Consequently, the layer-to-layer comparison of velocities does not by itself establish acceleration of a single flow between ~1.5 and ~1.8 R*; the Mg, H2O, and CO lines could trace distinct gas components or a broad height range. This is load-bearing for the central claim and requires either a radiative-transfer model of R Dor or a conservative rephrasing of the conclusion.
  2. [Appendix B] The simulated-data tests validate the image reconstruction for a static, known source, but they do not validate the velocity-extraction procedure. The line-of-sight velocities in Section 4.3 are derived by cross-correlating spatially resolved spectra, including off-limb emission spectra, with a hydrostatic MARCS absorption spectrum. No test demonstrates that this cross-correlation recovers a known input velocity field for emission lines or for optically thick CO lines. I request such a test, for example using synthetic spectra from a moving model atmosphere with a known velocity law, to confirm that the measured 7-15 km/s blueshifts are not biased by the choice of the reference spectrum or by the absorption-to-emission transition across the limb.
  3. [Section 5 and Abstract] The ALMA observations of Vlemmings et al. (2018), cited by the authors, show no outward motion within 4 R* at a different epoch, and the paper itself notes that the outward motion may be intermittent or ballistic. The abstract nevertheless presents a 'strong acceleration of material between ~1.5 and 1.8 R*' as a main result. Given the height-assignment issue raised above and the epoch discrepancy, the abstract and conclusion should more prominently qualify the acceleration claim as one possible interpretation rather than an established measurement.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.1 and Table 1] There are two typos: 'Adoped' in Table 1 should be 'Adopted', and the phrase 'limb-darkened disk diameter xsand distance' in Section 3.1 should read 'limb-darkened disk diameter and distance'.
  2. [Figures 7d-7f] The uncertainty maps in Figure 7d-7f show the total 1σ including the reconstruction scatter and calibration terms, but the color bars are labeled only with the standard deviation; it would help to state explicitly in the caption that these panels include the systematic terms quoted in the text.
  3. [Section 4.2, Figure 5 caption] In the caption of Figure 5, the reference to 'Figure 4f' in the sentence about blueshifts at position 4 appears to be a typo; the relevant panel is Figure 5f, not Figure 4f.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the velocity maps are measured against an external hydrostatic MARCS template and a literature systemic velocity, and the acceleration inference is an explicitly qualified interpretation rather than a self-referential fit.

full rationale

Section 4.3 derives line-of-sight velocities by cross-correlating spatially resolved spectra with a synthetic MARCS spectrum whose line wavelengths come from laboratory line lists and whose wavelength shift uses a systemic velocity (7.5 km/s LSR) adopted from independent radio/far-IR observations. No parameter is fitted to the observed blueshift; the measured 7–15 km/s outward motion is not constrained by construction. The formation heights (<1.13 R*, ~1.5 R*, ~1.8 R*) are inferred from the spatial extent of the reconstructed images in Section 4.1, not from the velocity data, so the acceleration claim is an interpretation whose validity depends on the assumed stratification and on H2O and CO tracing the same flow. That is a physical assumption the authors explicitly qualify in Section 5, including the possibility of intermittent or ballistic motion and the ALMA non-detection, not a circular derivation. The self-citations (Ohnaka et al. 2011, 2013, 2017b for reconstruction; Ohnaka et al. 2012, 2019 for CO opacity estimates) support methods or auxiliary opacity estimates, and the reconstruction is independently checked against simulated data in Appendix B with the same prior applied to all wavelength channels. Hence the paper is self-contained against external benchmarks, and no equation-level reduction or fitted-parameter-as-prediction circularity exists.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central measurement depends on an adopted systemic velocity, a hydrostatic MARCS template as zero-velocity reference, inferred line-formation heights, and image-reconstruction prior parameters. No new physical entities are introduced; the dust and grain species discussed are taken from the cited literature. The free parameters are regularization and calibration choices rather than fitted astrophysical constants.

free parameters (4)
  • Fermi prior radius r_p = 20.0-25.0 mas
    MiRA regularization prior radius, selected via simulated-data experiments; final images are the median over 18 combinations. This parameter influences the reconstructed extension and therefore the inferred line-formation heights.
  • Fermi prior steepness epsilon_p = 2.0-3.0 mas
    Controls the falloff of the prior near the stellar limb; same simulated-data selection and median-averaging procedure as r_p.
  • Limb-darkened disk diameter = 51.18 +/- 2.24 mas
    Fit to continuum visibilities with a power-law limb-darkened disk; used to set the stellar radius and as the starting model for image reconstruction.
  • Limb-darkening parameter = 0.61 +/- 0.24
    Same continuum fit; used for the initial model and stellar parameter derivation.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Systemic velocity of R Dor is 7.5 km/s in the local standard of rest (23.9 km/s heliocentric), adopted from published CO/radio measurements.
    Zero-point for all measured line-of-sight velocities; uncertainty is 1 km/s. If wrong, all velocity maps shift, but the layer-to-layer comparison is less affected.
  • domain assumption The hydrostatic MARCS synthetic spectrum with T_eff=2700 K, log g=0.0, M=1 M_sun, v_micro=2 km/s is an adequate zero-velocity template for the cross-correlation velocity measurement.
    The template line positions set the zero velocity. The authors argue the model's log g mismatch with the observed -0.6 does not affect wavelengths (Section 3.2).
  • domain assumption Line-formation heights: Mg below about 1.13 R*, H2O at about 1.5 R*, CO first overtone at about 1.8 R*.
    Heights are assigned from the spatial extension of reconstructed images and literature arguments, not from a radiative-transfer model of R Dor. This stratification underpins the acceleration inference.
  • domain assumption The CO lines are optically thick and their blueshift is interpreted as Doppler motion of gas rather than opacity or imaging artifacts.
    The authors cite literature CO column densities and note the blue wing is more extended than the red wing, but no moving-atmosphere radiative-transfer model is fitted to the data.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Infrared interferometric three-dimensional diagnosis of the atmospheric dynamics of the AGB star R Dor with VLTI/AMBER." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P7IQRVW7

@misc{pith2026190806997,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Infrared interferometric three-dimensional diagnosis of the atmospheric dynamics of the AGB star R Dor with VLTI/AMBER},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P7IQRVW7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.06997}
}
read the original abstract

The mechanism of mass loss in late evolutionary stages of low- and intermediate-mass stars is not yet well understood. Therefore, it is crucial to study the dynamics of the region within a few stellar radii, where the wind acceleration is considered to take place. We present three-dimensional diagnosis of the atmospheric dynamics of the closest asymptotic giant branch (AGB) star R Dor from the low photospheric layers to the extended outer atmosphere--for the first time for a star other than the Sun. The images reconstructed with a spatial resolution of 6.8 mas--seven times finer than the star's angular diameter of 51.2 mas in the continuum--using the AMBER instrument at the Very Large Telescope Interferometer show a large, bright region over the surface of the star and an extended atmosphere. The velocity-field maps over the star's surface and atmosphere obtained from the Mg and H2O lines near 2.3 micron forming at atmospheric heights below ~1.5 stellar radii show little systematic motion beyond the measurement uncertainty of 1.7 km/s. In marked contrast, the velocity-field map obtained from the CO first overtone lines reveals systematic outward motion at 7--15 km/s in the extended outer atmosphere at a height of ~1.8 stellar radii. Given the detection of dust formation at ~1.5 stellar radii, the strong acceleration of material between ~1.5 and 1.8 stellar radii may be caused by the radiation pressure on dust grains. However, we cannot yet exclude the possibility that the outward motion may be intermittent, caused by ballistic motion due to convection and/or pulsation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.06997 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The uv coverage of our VLTI/AMBER observa￾tions of R Dor with six different AT configurations. Our observations and data reduction are summarized in Section 2. The analysis of the reduced data is de￾scribed in Section 3. We present the results in Section 4 followed by discussion and conclusion in Section 5. 2. OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION 2.1. AMBER observations Our target R Dor is one of the well-studied AGB sta… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Power-law-type limb-darkened (LD) disk fitting of the AMBER data of R Dor. a: Limb-darkened disk diameter (red line) and the scaled observed spectrum (black line). The CO and H2O lines that give rise to the increases in the limb￾darkened disk diameter and the limb-darkening parameter are marked. Other atomic and molecular lines without a increase in the limb-darkened disk diameter are also marked. While the waveleng… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. H-R diagram with the position of R Dor (filled circle) and evolutionary tracks with Z = 0.014 for 1, 1.25, and 1.5 M⊙ stars from Lagarde et al. (2012) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Wavelength-dependent images of the surface and extended atmosphere of R Dor. The images reconstructed at nine representative wavelength channels in the molecular and atomic lines of Mg, Ti, HF, and H2O (panels a–d) and across one of the CO lines (panels e–i) are shown.…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spatially resolved spectra of the lines of Mg and H2O obtained over the surface and atmosphere of R Dor. The Mg and H2O lines probe the gas dynamics at atmospheric heights of .1.13 R⋆ and ∼1.5 R⋆, respectively. a and b: The images reconstructed at the center of the Mg …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spatially resolved CO line spectra obtained over the surface and atmosphere of R Dor. a: The image reconstructed at the center of the CO line at 2.30150 µm. The positions 1, 2, and 3 are where the spatially resolved spectra exemplarily shown in panels b–g were derived.…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Velocity-field maps obtained at different atmospheric heights of R Dor. North is up, east is to the left. a: Velocity￾field map in the deep (low) layers at atmospheric heights lower than .1.13 R⋆ (measured from the stellar center) obtained from the Mg line at 2.28164 µ…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Image reconstruction of simulated data. The images are normalized with the intensity at the stellar disk center (i.e., the intensity higher than 1 means a bright spot). a: Original image of the simulated star consisting of a limb-darkened disk, seven spots, and an exte…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Radial profiles of the prior and the azimuthally averaged radial profiles of the images reconstructed across the CO line profile centered at 2.30155 µm. The reconstruction was carried out with the quadratic regularization with rp = 22.5 mas and εp = 2.5 mas. The radial…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of the observed interferometric observables and those from the images reconstructed in the Mg (2.28164 µm) and H2O lines (2.28478 µm). The reconstruction was carried out with the quadratic regularization with rp = 22.5 mas and εp = 2.5 mas. The top row (a–d…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ur Radioastronomie\\ Auf dem H\

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

    2017

  2. [2]

    Adam, C., & Ohnaka, K.\ 2019, , in press, astro-ph/1907.05534

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  3. [3]

    Arenou, F., Grenon, M., & G\'omez, A.\ 1992, , 258, 104

    work page 1992

  4. [4]

    R., Zijlstra, A

    Bedding, T. R., Zijlstra, A. A., von der L\"uhe, O., et al.\ 1997, , 286, 957

    work page 1997

  5. [5]

    A., Clayton, G

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S.\ 1989, , 345, 245

    1989

  6. [6]

    Chelli, A., Hernandez Utrera, O., & Duvert, G.\ 2009, A&A, 502, 705

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Decin, L., Richards, A. M. S., Danilovich, T., Homan, W., & Nuth, J. A.\ 2018, , 615, A28

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    J.\ 1956, , 123, 210

    Deutsch, A. J.\ 1956, , 123, 210

    work page 1956

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    G.\ 2008, , 489, L5

    Domiciano de Souza, A., Bendjoya, P., Vakili, F., Millour, F., & Petrov, P. G.\ 2008, , 489, L5

    2008

  2. [10]

    R.\ 2002, Catalogue of Stellar Photometry in Johnson's 11-color system

    Ducati, J. R.\ 2002, Catalogue of Stellar Photometry in Johnson's 11-color system

    2002

  3. [11]

    J.\ 1993, An Introduction to the Bootstrap (New York, Chapman & Hall)

    Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J.\ 1993, An Introduction to the Bootstrap (New York, Chapman & Hall)

    1993

  4. [12]

    Freytag, B., Liljegren, S., & H\"ofner, S.\ 2017, , 600, A137

    2017

  5. [13]

    Gonz\'alez Delgado, D., Olofsson, H., Kerschbaum, F., et al.\ 2003, , 411, 123

    2003

  6. [14]

    Goorvitch, D.\ 1994, ApJS, 95, 535

    1994

  7. [15]

    Gustafsson, B., Edvardsson, B., Eriksson, K., et al.\ 2008, , 486, 951

    2008

  8. [16]

    H., & Barnes, T

    Hinkle, K. H., & Barnes, T. G.\ 1979, , 227, 923

    1979

  9. [17]

    H., Lebzelter, T., Joyce, R

    Hinkle, K. H., Lebzelter, T., Joyce, R. R., & Fekel, F. C.\ 2002, , 123, 1002

    2002

  10. [18]

    Homan, W., Danilovich, T., Decin, L., et al.\ 2018, , 614, A113

    2018

  11. [19]

    H\"ofner, S.\ 2008, , 491, L1

    2008

  12. [20]

    H\"ofner, S., Bladh, S., Aringer, B., & Ahuja, R.\ 2016, , 594, A108

    2016

  13. [21]

    H\"ofner, S., & Olofsson, H.\ 2018, , 26, 1

    2018

  14. [22]

    H\"ofner, S., & Freytag, B.\ 2019, , 623, A158

    2019

  15. [23]

    Hestroffer, D.\ 1997, , 327, 199

    1997

  16. [24]

    Hillen, M., Verhoelst, T., Degroote, P., Acke, B., & van Winckel, H.\ 2012, , 538, L6

    2012

  17. [25]

    J., Tuthill, P

    Ireland, M. J., Tuthill, P. G., Davis, J., & Tango, W.\ 2005, , 361, 337

    2005

  18. [26]

    V., & Lambert, D

    Jorissen, A., Smith, V. V., & Lambert, D. L.\ 1992, , 261, 164

    1992

  19. [27]

    G., Johnson, H

    J rgensen, U. G., Johnson, H. R., & Nordlund, \ 1992, , 261,263

    1992

  20. [28]

    Khouri, T., Maercker, M., Waters, L. B. F. M., et al.\ 2016, , 591, A70

    2016

  21. [29]

    Khouri, T., Vlemmings, W. H. T., Olofsson, H., et al.\ 2018, , 620, A75

    2018

  22. [30]

    L., & Bell, B.\ 1995, Atomic Line Data, Kurucz CD-ROM No

    Kurucz, R. L., & Bell, B.\ 1995, Atomic Line Data, Kurucz CD-ROM No. 23. Cambridge, Mass.: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory

    1995

  23. [31]

    Perrin, G., et al.\ 2009, , 707, 632

    Lacour, S., Thi\' e baut, E. Perrin, G., et al.\ 2009, , 707, 632

    2009

  24. [32]

    Lagarde, N., Decressin, T., Charbonnel, C.\ 2012, , 543, A108

    2012

  25. [33]

    Le Bouquin, J.-B., Absil, O., Benisty, M., et al.\ 2009, , 498, L41

    2009

  26. [34]

    M., Quirrenbach, A., et al.\ 2011, , 529, A115

    Mart\'i-Vidal, I., Marcaide, J. M., Quirrenbach, A., et al.\ 2011, , 529, A115

    2011

  27. [35]

    C.\ 1987, , 71, 413

    Mermilliod, J. C.\ 1987, , 71, 413

    1987

  28. [36]

    Millour, F., Meilland, A., Chesneau, O., et al.\ 2011, , 526, A107

    2011

  29. [37]

    Norris, B. R. M., Tuthill, P. G., Ireland, M. J., et al.\ 2012, , 220, 484

    2012

  30. [38]

    Ohnaka, K., Hofmann, K.-H., Benisty, M., et al.\ 2009, , 503, 183

    2009

  31. [39]

    Ohnaka, K., Weigelt, G., Millour, F., et al.\ 2011, , 529, A163

    2011

  32. [40]

    Ohnaka, K., Hofmann, K.-H., Schertl, D., et al.\ 2012, A&A, 537, A53

    2012

  33. [41]

    Ohnaka, K., Hofmann, K-.H., Schertl, D., et al.\ 2013, , 555, A24

    2013

  34. [42]

    Ohnaka, K., Weigelt, G., Hofmann, K.-H.\ 2016, , 589, A91

    2016

  35. [43]

    Ohnaka, K., Weigelt, G., Hofmann, K.-H.\ 2017, , 597, A20

    2017

  36. [44]

    Ohnaka, K., Weigelt, G., Hofmann, K.-H.\ 2017, , 310, 548

    2017

  37. [45]

    Ohnaka, K., Hadjara, M., & Maluenda Berna, M. Y. L.\ 2019, , 621, A6

    2019

  38. [46]

    Paladini, C., Baron, F., Jorissen, A., et al.\ 2018, , 310, 553

    2018

  39. [47]

    Park, S., et al.\ 2018, , 238, 29

    2018

  40. [48]

    G., Malbet, F., Weigelt, G., et al.\ 2007, , 464, 1

    Petrov, R. G., Malbet, F., Weigelt, G., et al.\ 2007, , 464, 1

    2007

  41. [49]

    L., Kyuberis, A

    Polyansky, O. L., Kyuberis, A. A., Zobov, N. F.\ 2018, , 480, 2597

    2018

  42. [50]

    D., Smith, B

    Price, S. D., Smith, B. J., Kuchar, T. A., Mizuno, D. R., & Kraemer, K. E.\ 2010, , 190, 203

    2010

  43. [51]

    Ragland, S., Le Coroller, H., Pluzhnik, E., et al.\ 2008, , 679, 746

    2008

  44. [52]

    Ryde, N., & Eriksson, K.\ 2002, , 386, 874

    2002

  45. [53]

    N., Kazarovets, E

    Samus, N. N., Kazarovets, E. V., Durlevich, O. V., Kireeva, N. N., Pastukhova, E. N., General Catalogue of Variable Stars: Version GCVS 5.1, 2017, Astronomy Reports, 2017, 61, 80

    2017

  46. [54]

    R., Pauls, T

    Schmitt, H. R., Pauls, T. A., Tycner, C., et al.\ 2009, , 691, 984

    2009

  47. [55]

    C., Kraemer, K

    Sloan, G. C., Kraemer, K. E., Price, S. D., & Shipman, R. F.\ 2003, , 147, 379

    2003

  48. [56]

    S., Brooke, J

    Sneden, C., Lucatello, S., Ram, R. S., Brooke, J. S. A., & Bernath, P.\ 2014, , 214, 26

    2014

  49. [57]

    N., Tuthill, P

    Stewart, P. N., Tuthill, P. G., Nicholson, P. D., Sloan, G. C., & Hedman, M. M.\ 2015, , 221, 30

    2015

  50. [58]

    Tatulli, E., Millour, F., Chelli, A., et al.\ 2007, , 464, 29

    2007

  51. [59]

    Thi\'ebaut, E.\ 2008, , 7013, 70131I

    2008

  52. [60]

    Van de Sande, M., Decin, L., Lombaert, R., et al.\ 2018, , 609, A63

    2018

  53. [61]

    van Leeuwen, F.\ 1997, , 474, 653

    1997

  54. [62]

    Vlemmings, W. H. T., Khouri, T., De Beck, E., et al.\ 2018, , 613, L4

    2018

  55. [63]

    Weigelt, G., Hofmann, K.-H., Schertl, D., et al.\ 2016, , 594, A106

    2016

  56. [64]

    A., Driebe, T., et al.\ 2008, , 479, L21

    Wittkowski, M., Boboltz, D. A., Driebe, T., et al.\ 2008, , 479, L21

    2008

  57. [65]

    A., Ireland, M., et al.\ 2011, , 532, L7

    Wittkowski, M., Boboltz, D. A., Ireland, M., et al.\ 2011, , 532, L7

    2011

  58. [66]

    Wittkowski, M., Hofmann, K.-H., H\"ofner, S., et al.\ 2017, , 601, A3

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.