Continuum models of directed polymers on disordered diamond fractals in the critical case

Jeremy Clark

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Continuum models of directed polymers on disordered diamond fractals in the critical case

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper constructs a unique one-parameter family of continuum random polymer measures on a two-dimensional diamond fractal and shows that, under their realizations, two independent paths intersect in uncountable sets of Hausdorff…

desk verdict The critical CRPM construction and the log-Hausdorff intersection analysis are genuinely new and mostly solid, but Theorem 2.11 is imported wholesale from the companion paper [11], so the manuscript is a conditional extension rather than a self-contained proof. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07120 v3 pith:ABKOYI7T submitted 2019-08-20 math.PR

Jeremy Clark This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.PR MSC 60K3528A8060G5728A7882D60

keywords directedpolymerscontinuumrandompolymerdiamondfractalcriticaldisorderweak-disorderscalingHausdorffdimensionlog-Hausdorffexponenthierarchicallattice

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to construct the continuum random polymer measures that arise as the weak-disorder scaling limit of directed polymers on diamond hierarchical graphs exactly at marginal relevance, where the graph has Hausdorff dimension two. It claims there is a unique one-parameter family of random measures on the space of directed paths with prescribed expectation, correlations, and a recursive self-similarity identity. If the construction is right, the critical measures are qualitatively different from their subcritical counterparts: although two paths drawn from the uniform measure almost surely cross only finitely often, paths drawn from a single realization of the disordered measure almost surely have positively weighted intersection sets that are uncountable yet of Hausdorff dimension zero. The paper further proves these zero-dimensional sets have logarithmic Hausdorff exponent exactly one. A sympathetic reader would care because this gives a concrete, exactly solvable model for the marginally relevant disorder regime, where a Gaussian multiplicative chaos representation is impossible.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the edge-labeled random arrays $\{W_e^{(k)}\}_{e\in E_k}$, i.i.d. within each generation, with mean one, variance $R(r-k)$, and the exact recursion $W_e^{(k)}=\frac{1}{b}\sum_i\prod_j W_{e\times(i,j)}^{(k+1)}$. The variance function $R(r)$ satisfies $R(r+1)=\frac{1}{b}[(1+R(r))^b-1]$ with prescribed asymptotics, and it fixes the total-mass fluctuations while entering the cylinder formula for the correlation measure $\upsilon_r(p\times q)=|\Gamma_n|^{-2}(1+R(r-n))^{\xi_n(p,q)}$. The martingale $\varphi_n^{(r,t)}$ links the correlation measures at different parameters and produces the intersection-time kernel $T(p,q)=\lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\kappa^2}{n^2}\xi_n(p,q)$. A generation-inhomogeneous population model for shared edges $\xi_n$ and surviving lineage count $\tilde{\xi}_n$ translates intersection-set sizes into a critical branching process, yielding the logarithmic energy bound and the log-Hausdorff exponent one.

What would settle it

Compute the finite-$n$ pair correlation $\mathbb{E}[M_{r,n}(p)M_{r,n}(q)]$ for two cylinder paths in the discrete model of Theorem 2.22; Lemma 2.7 predicts it equals $|\Gamma_n|^{-2}(1+R(r-n))^{\xi_n(p,q)}$. A measured deviation from this formula for large $n$, or a direct construction of two different array laws satisfying Theorem 5.2 for the same $r$, would disprove the uniqueness or existence claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is the existence and uniqueness of the random measures $M_r$ on the path space $\Gamma$ of the diamond fractal of Hausdorff dimension two, satisfying $\mathbb{E}[M_r]=\mu$, $\mathbb{E}[M_r\times M_r]=\upsilon_r$, finite centered moments of total mass with variance $R(r)$, and the recursive distributional identity $M_{r+1}\overset{d}{=}\frac{1}{b}\sum_{i=1}^{b}\prod_{j=1}^{b} M_r^{(i,j)}$. The construction starts from edge-labeled random arrays $W_e^{(k)}$ with mean one, variance $R(r-k)$, and the exact recursion $W_e^{(k)}=\frac{1}{b}\sum_{i=1}^{b}\prod_{j=1}^{b} W_{e\times(i,j)}^{(k+1)}$; the measure of a cylinder path is a normalized product of array entries. The paper then shows that for a.e. realization of $M_r$, the product $M_r\times M_r$ assigns positive weight to pairs of paths whose intersection-time set is uncountable but of Hausdorff dimension zero, with log-Hausdorff exponent exactly one, and that the law of $M_r$ cannot be represented as a subcritical Gaussian multiplicative chaos because the formal coupling strength would have to be infinite.

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction assumes Theorem 5.2 from the companion preprint, which asserts the existence and uniqueness of the edge-labeled random arrays with the prescribed variances and exact recursion; if that theorem or the variance-function lemma from [9] fails, the random measures $M_r$ need not exist.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For every real $r$ there is exactly one law of random measures $M_r$ satisfying the four axioms of Theorem 2.11, realized by the product construction from edge-labeled arrays.
For a.e. realization of $M_r$, the product $M_r\times M_r$ gives positive weight to path pairs whose intersection-time set is either finite or uncountable of Hausdorff dimension zero; in the second case the log-Hausdorff exponent is exactly one.
$M_r$ is a.s. non-atomic and mutually singular to the uniform path measure, has dense support, converges to the uniform measure as $r\to-\infty$, and its total mass converges in probability to zero as $r\to\infty$.
The continuum measures are the $n\to\infty$ weak-disorder limits of finite polymer partition-function measures at the critical scaling $\beta_{n,r}=\kappa n^{-1/2}-\tau\kappa^2/(2n)+\kappa\eta\log n/n^{3/2}+\kappa r/n^{3/2}+o(n^{-3/2})$.
The induced spatial intersection measure $\vartheta_{M_r}$ has expectation $R'(r)\nu$, is a.s. of Hausdorff dimension two, has logarithmic energy finite exactly for $\lambda>9$, and the intersection kernel defines a Hilbert-Schmidt but not trace-class operator on $L^2(\Gamma,M_r)$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the construction is correct, the exact log-Hausdorff exponent one is a quantitative prediction: Monte Carlo sampling of finite-$n$ critical polymers on diamond graphs should show that surviving shared-edge lineages grow linearly in $n$, so the minimal cover count of the intersection set grows like $n$, not $n^2$.
The same array-recursion method may generalize to other exactly renormalizable hierarchical graphs of Hausdorff dimension two, where the same critical population transition would force path intersections onto dimension-zero sets.
The Hilbert-Schmidt but not trace-class dichotomy for $T_{M_r}$ suggests that the natural Gaussian field on $(\Gamma,M_r)$ has rougher sample paths than in the subcritical GMC picture; this could be tested through the a.s. modulus of continuity of the conditional field constructed from $M_R$ for $R<r$.
The critical CRPMs here provide a hierarchical toy model for the critical (2+1)-dimensional stochastic heat equation, where no exact GMC construction is available; the intersections of independent paths under $M_r$ may be the analogue of the collision structure expected in that setting.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear colleague,

Here is my take. The genuinely new content is the family of critical continuum random polymer measures and, more importantly, the analysis of their intersection-time sets: Lemma 2.26 and Theorem 2.27 give the log-Hausdorff exponent exactly 1, and the proof goes through the correlation measure, martingale convergence, and an energy bound (Prop 6.7) that looks correct. I also found the ϑ_Mr correlation asymptotics in Theorem 2.34 and the Hilbert–Schmidt/trace-class decomposition in Theorem 2.41 careful and plausible. Section 4, where the correlation measure is built from first principles, is self-contained and rigorous.

The soft spot is the one the reader flagged: Theorem 2.11, the existence and uniqueness of M_r, is not proved here. It relies on Theorem 5.2 (Theorem 3.12 of [11]), which supplies the edge-labeled arrays with exact recursion and prescribed moments. The paper says so explicitly, so there is no pretense, but the uniqueness half of 2.11 is basically equivalent to the uniqueness half of 5.2. If the array theorem has a gap, the construction of M_r and every later theorem has no support inside this manuscript. The variance function R(r) is likewise imported from [9]. Neither proof is reproduced.

There are minor issues: Proposition 2.16(v)'s proof is in [12], and in the proof of Theorem 2.22, 'By Theorem 2.22' should presumably be 'By Theorem 5.5' — a typo, but confusing.

Should a referee engage? Yes. The self-contained parts are solid and the intersection-time analysis is a real contribution. But the referee must have access to [11] and [9], or the author should be asked to include the array construction (or at least a detailed proof sketch) in a revised version. Without that, the paper is a conditional extension of the companion work, not an independent object.

For whom: specialists in directed polymers on hierarchical lattices and fractal disordered systems. It would be a good reading-group paper if [11] is on the table. I would not desk-reject it.

Best.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a one-parameter family of random measures (M_r)_{r∈R} on the space of directed paths of a diamond fractal of Hausdorff dimension two, intended as continuum limits of critical weak-disorder polymer models. The construction is based on an external theorem on edge-labeled arrays; from these arrays the paper defines M_r by product weights on cylinder sets and verifies expectation μ, correlation measure υ_r, moment formulas, and a recursive distributional identity. The main probabilistic results are: M_r is a.s. singular to μ and non-atomic; under M_r×M_r, pairs of paths have intersection-time sets that are a.s. uncountable of Hausdorff dimension zero, with log-Hausdorff exponent exactly one on a positive-measure event; the associated spatial intersection measure ϑ_Mr on the fractal has Hausdorff dimension two and finite logarithmic energy only for exponent λ>9; and the intersection-time kernel defines a Hilbert-Schmidt, non-trace-class operator on L^2(Γ,M_r). The paper also states a weak-disorder continuum limit theorem whose proof reduces to an external array convergence theorem.

Significance. If the external premises hold, the paper gives a rare explicit continuum model for marginally relevant disorder in a hierarchical setting, with exact renormalization symmetry and precise intersection-set dimension. The self-contained parts—correlation measure construction, martingale analysis, population-model estimates, energy bounds, and the operator factorization—are detailed and mostly convincing. The main caveat is that the existence and uniqueness of the central random measures is not proved in this manuscript; it is imported from the author's companion preprint. The paper is therefore best read as a conditional construction whose value depends on the companion result being made available and verified.

major comments (2)

[§5.1 and §5.3] The proof of Theorem 2.11 begins by stating that it relies on Theorem 5.2, which was proven in [11]. Theorem 5.2 supplies the i.i.d. edge-labeled arrays W_e^{(k)} with mean one, variance R(r-k), prescribed centered moments, and the a.s. recursion W_e^{(k)}=(1/b)Σ_i Π_j W_{e×(i,j)}^{(k+1)}. The measure M_r is then defined as a product of these W's over coarse-grained edges, and the uniqueness argument identifies any competing family's total masses with the unique array law from Theorem 5.2. Thus Theorem 2.11 is logically equivalent to the imported array theorem, and Theorem 2.22 is likewise reduced to Theorem 5.5 from [11]. Because [11] is a preprint not included in the submission, the central claim is not self-contained. The paper should either prove Theorem 5.2 and Theorem 5.5 here, or give a precise published reference that supplies them.
[§5.1, uniqueness half of Theorem 2.11] The uniqueness argument assumes that any family (M_r) satisfying properties (I)-(IV) admits a consistent edge-indexed family (M^e_{r-k}) as in Corollary 2.14. Corollary 2.14 is stated without proof, and it is not immediate from property (IV) alone because that property is only an equality in distribution for the single measure, not a construction of an a.s. coupled collection indexed by all e∈∪E_k. Since the uniqueness half of Theorem 2.11 depends on this step, a proof of Corollary 2.14, or another argument establishing the array recursion a.s., is required.

minor comments (5)

[Definition 2.21] The sentence 'ϱ_n(p)=ϱ_n(p) for every p∈Γ_n' is a tautology; the intended definition of the averaged measure on Γ should be stated with a fresh symbol or with explicit reference to M^ω_{β,n}.
[Proposition 2.16(v)] Part (v) of Proposition 2.16 is stated as a result of this paper, but its proof is deferred to [12]; either include the proof here or label the statement as imported from the companion preprint.
[§6.1] The probability expression '1/b(R(r-n-1))^b/(1+R(r-n))' is missing parentheses; it should be written as (1/b)(R(r-n-1))^b/(1+R(r-n)) to avoid ambiguity.
[Lemma 6.4] The notation in part (iii) switches between E_{υr} and E_{~υr}; the proof should use one probability measure consistently, since ~υr is not defined in the statement.
[Section 1] The text refers to an illustration of the first few diamond graphs, but no figure appears in the manuscript; either include the figure or delete the reference.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Central uniqueness of M_r and the weak-disorder limit are imported from the author's companion preprint [11]; Theorem 2.11 reduces to Theorem 5.2 by construction, while later results are derived internally.

uniqueness imported from authors [Section 5.1, proof of Theorem 2.11 (Theorem 5.2 = Theorem 3.12 of [11])]
"The proof of Theorem 2.11 below relies on Theorem 5.2, which was proven in [11]. ... To see uniqueness, let (M̂r)r∈R be such a family ... The family of random variables Ŵ(k)e := M̂e_{r−k}(Γ) ... satisfies properties (I)-(IV) of Theorem 5.2. This uniquely determines the joint law ... implying that M̂r is equal in law to the random measure Mr constructed above."

Theorem 2.11 is the paper's central existence/uniqueness claim. Its proof does not construct M_r from scratch: M_r(A) is defined as a sum of products of the W-arrays whose law is taken verbatim from Theorem 5.2 of [11]. The uniqueness half is the converse: any candidate M_r produces total-mass arrays satisfying exactly the four properties of Theorem 5.2, so uniqueness is inherited from [11]. Thus the unique one-parameter family, the central premise of all later theorems, is not derived in this manuscript; it is imported from a same-author preprint that is not included or proved here. The reduction is explicit in the text, not a matter of interpretation.
self citation load bearing [Section 5.3, proof of Theorem 2.22 (Theorem 5.5 = Theorem 3.14 of [11])]
"The proof of Theorem 2.22 relies on Theorem 5.5 which was proven in [11]. ... By Theorem 2.22, the array of random variables {W(N,n)e}e∈EN converges in law as n→∞ to the array {W(N)e}e∈EN."

Theorem 2.22 is the article's continuum-limit result for the discrete Gibbs measures. The proof consists of replacing the finite-n arrays W(k,n) by their n→∞ limits, and that convergence is precisely Theorem 5.5, imported from [11]. No independent proof of the limit is supplied; the paper only checks that simple functions of the limiting arrays give Mr. Hence the 'weak-disorder/continuum limit' claim rests on the same author's companion preprint, so the result is a restatement of [11, Theorem 3.14] in the language of measures rather than an internally derived theorem.

full rationale

No fitted-data circularity and no ansatz-renaming appear in the paper: the correlation measure υ_r, the intersection-time kernel T, the log-Hausdorff exponent results, and the operator-theoretic consequences are derived internally from the constructed M_r and υ_r via martingale and energy arguments. The circular weight comes from the fact that the central existence/uniqueness theorem is not self-contained: Theorem 2.11 is built directly on Theorem 5.2 from the author's companion preprint [11], and its uniqueness half explicitly reduces to the uniqueness theorem in [11]. The weak-disorder limit Theorem 2.22 likewise depends on Theorem 5.5 from [11]. Lemma 2.5, imported from [9], is also a self-citation for the variance function R, but it is a separate published result and is not the target claim. The later intersection and operator theorems do not reduce by definition to the imported theorems, so the overall circularity is moderate rather than total.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim is built on imported results: the array existence theorem from [11], the variance function R from [9], and the DHL/path-space framework from [10]. The new analysis of intersections, correlation measures, and operators is performed within the paper. No data are fitted; the only hand-chosen parameter is b≥2.

free parameters (1)

b
Branching and segmenting number of the diamond fractal; a fixed integer b≥2 chosen by hand. The entire construction and all constants (κ, η) depend on b.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Theorem 5.2 (from [11], Thm 3.12): existence and uniqueness of edge-labeled nonnegative arrays {W_e^{(k)}} with mean 1, variance R(r-k), finite m-th moments R^{(m)}(r-k), and the recursive relation W_e^{(k)} = (1/b) Σ_i Π_j W^{(k+1)}_{e×(i,j)}.
This is the foundation for constructing M_r in Theorem 2.11; the proof is not included in this paper and is taken from the author's companion preprint [11].
domain assumption Lemma 2.5 (from [9]): existence and uniqueness of the differentiable increasing variance function R: R→R+ satisfying M_b(R(r)) = R(r+1), with asymptotics R(r) = -κ²/r + κ²η log(-r)/r² + O(log²(-r)/r³) and derivative property.
The entire correlation structure and moment formulas depend on R; the proof is cited from [9].
domain assumption The path space construction (Γ, μ) as isometric embeddings of [0,1] into the diamond fractal D with Hausdorff dimension 2, and the canonical uniform measure μ, are taken from [10].
This provides the underlying probability space; the definition is imported from prior work [10].
standard math Standard measure theory: Carathéodory extension, martingale convergence, Fatou's lemma, and energy arguments for Hausdorff dimension are used as standard mathematical tools.
Used throughout; no special assumptions.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Continuum models of directed polymers on disordered diamond fractals in the critical case." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ABKOYI7T

@misc{pith2026190807120,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Continuum models of directed polymers on disordered diamond fractals in the critical case},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ABKOYI7T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07120}
}

abstract

We construct and study a family random continuum polymer measures $\mathbf{M}_{r}$ corresponding to limiting partition function laws recently derived in a weak-coupling regime of polymer models on hierarchical graphs with marginally relevant disorder. The continuum polymers, which we refer to as directed paths, are identified with isometric embeddings of the unit interval $[0,1]$ into a compact diamond fractal with Hausdorff dimension two, and there is a natural 'uniform' probability measure, $\mu$, over the space of directed paths, $\Gamma$. Realizations of the random path measures $\mathbf{M}_{r}$ exhibit strong localization properties in comparison to their subcritical counterparts when the diamond fractal has dimension less than two. Whereas two paths $p,q\in \Gamma$ sampled independently using the pure measure $\mu$ have only finitely many intersections with probability one, a realization of the disordered product measure $ \mathbf{M}_{r}\times \mathbf{M}_{r}$ a.s. assigns positive weight to the set of pairs of paths $(p,q)$ whose intersection sets are uncountable but of Hausdorff dimension zero. We give a more refined characterization of the size of these dimension-zero sets using generalized (logarithmic) Hausdorff measures. The law of the random measure $\mathbf{M}_{r}$ cannot be constructed as a subcritical Gaussian multiplicative chaos because the coupling strength to the Gaussian field would, in a formal sense, have to be infinite.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

The conditional Gaussian multiplicative chaos structure underlying a critical continuum random polymer model on a diamond fractal
math.PR 2019-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

The critical continuum polymer measures on the dimension-two diamond fractal are shown to satisfy a conditional Gaussian multiplicative chaos relation: M_{r+a} equals in law a subcritical GMC over M_r.
Weak-disorder limit at criticality for directed polymers on hierarchical graphs
math-ph 2019-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

The partition functions for directed polymers on diamond graphs with b=s converge in distribution to a unique limit law under a fine-tuned critical inverse-temperature scaling.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

21 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[11]

Clark: Weak-disorder limit at criticality for random directed polymers on hierarchical graphs, preprint (2019), arXiv:1908.06555

J.T. Clark: Weak-disorder limit at criticality for random directed polymers on hierarchical graphs, preprint (2019), arXiv:1908.06555

arXiv 2019
[9]

Clark: High-temperature scaling limit for directed polymer on a hierarchical lattice with bond disorder, J

J.T. Clark: High-temperature scaling limit for directed polymer on a hierarchical lattice with bond disorder, J. Stat. Phys. 174, No. 6, 1372-1403 (2019)

work page 2019
[12]

The conditional Gaussian multiplicative chaos structure underlying a critical continuum random polymer model on a diamond fractal

J.T. Clark: The conditional Gaussian multiplicative chaos structure underlying a critical contin- uum random polymer model on a diamond fractal , preprint (2019), arXiv:1908.08192

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[1]

Alberts, J

T. Alberts, J. Clark, S. Kocic: The intermediate disorder regime for a directed polymer model on a hierarchical lattice, Stoch. Process. Appl. 127, 3291-3330 (2017)

work page 2017
[2]

Alberts, K

T. Alberts, K. Khanin, J. Quastel: The intermediate disorder regime for directed polymers in dimension 1 + 1, Ann. Probab. 42, No. 3, 1212-1256 (2014)

work page 2014
[3]

Alberts, K

T. Alberts, K. Khanin, J. Quastel: The continuum directed random polymer, J. Stat. Phys. 154, No. 1-2, 305-326 (2014)

2014
[4]

Caravenna, R

F. Caravenna, R. Sun, and N. Zygouras: Polynomial chaos and scaling limits of disordered sys- tems, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 19, 1-65 (2017)

work page 2017
[5]

Caravenna, R

F. Caravenna, R. Sun, and N. Zygouras: Universality in marginally relevant disordered systems , Ann. Appl. Probab. 27, No. 5, 3050-3112 (2017)

work page 2017

Show all 21 references

[6]

Caravenna, R

F. Caravenna, R. Sun, N. Zygouras, The Dickman subordinator, renewal theorems, and disordered systems, Preprint (2018), arXiv:1805.01465v2

2018 arXiv
[7]

Caravenna, R

F. Caravenna, R. Sun, N. Zygouras: Scaling limits of disordered systems and disorder rel- evance, to appear in Proceedings of XVIII International Congress on Mathematical Physics, arXiv:1602.05825

arXiv
[8]

Caravenna, R

F. Caravenna, R. Sun, N. Zygouras: On the moments of the (2+1)-dimensional directed poly- mer and stochastic heat equation in the critical window , Commun. Math. Phys. (2019), DOI: 10.1007/s00220-019-03527-z

2019 doi
[10]

J.T. Clark: Continuum directed random polymers on disordered hierarchical diamond lattices , Stochastic Processes and their Applications (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spa.2019.05.008

2019 doi
[13]

Hausdorﬀ: Dimension und ueres Ma , Math

F. Hausdorﬀ: Dimension und ueres Ma , Math. Ann. 79, 157-179 (1918)

1918
[14]

Giacomin: Disorder and Critical Phenomena through Basic Probability Models , Lecture Notes in Mathematics Vol

G. Giacomin: Disorder and Critical Phenomena through Basic Probability Models , Lecture Notes in Mathematics Vol. 2025, Springer 2010. 42

2025
[15]

Y. Gu, J. Quastel, L. Tsai: Moments of the 2D SHE at Criticality , preprint (2019), arXiv:1905.11310

2019 arXiv
[16]

Hambly, T

B.M. Hambly, T. Kumagai: Diﬀusion on the scaling limit of the critical percolation cluster in the diamond hierarchical lattice, Adv. Appl. Prob., 36, 824-838 (2004)

2004
[17]

Molter, E

U. Molter, E. Rela: Improving dimension estimates for Furstenberg-type sets , Adv. Math. 223, No. 2, 672-688 (2010)

2010
[18]

Molter, E

U. Molter, E. Rela: Furstenberg sets for a fractal set of directions , Proc. Math. Soc. 140, 2753- 2765 (2012)

2012
[19]

Royden: Real Analysis, third edition, Macmillan 1988

H.L. Royden: Real Analysis, third edition, Macmillan 1988

1988
[20]

Ruiz: Explicit formulas for heat kernels on diamond fractals , Commun

P.A. Ruiz: Explicit formulas for heat kernels on diamond fractals , Commun. Math. Phys. 364, 1305-1326 (2018)

2018
[21]

Ruiz: Heat kernel analysis on diamond fractals , preprint (2019), arXiv:1906.06215

P.A. Ruiz: Heat kernel analysis on diamond fractals , preprint (2019), arXiv:1906.06215. 43

2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [11]

Clark: Weak-disorder limit at criticality for random directed polymers on hierarchical graphs, preprint (2019), arXiv:1908.06555

J.T. Clark: Weak-disorder limit at criticality for random directed polymers on hierarchical graphs, preprint (2019), arXiv:1908.06555

arXiv 2019

[2] [9]

Clark: High-temperature scaling limit for directed polymer on a hierarchical lattice with bond disorder, J

J.T. Clark: High-temperature scaling limit for directed polymer on a hierarchical lattice with bond disorder, J. Stat. Phys. 174, No. 6, 1372-1403 (2019)

work page 2019

[3] [12]

The conditional Gaussian multiplicative chaos structure underlying a critical continuum random polymer model on a diamond fractal

J.T. Clark: The conditional Gaussian multiplicative chaos structure underlying a critical contin- uum random polymer model on a diamond fractal , preprint (2019), arXiv:1908.08192

work page Pith review arXiv 2019

[4] [1]

Alberts, J

T. Alberts, J. Clark, S. Kocic: The intermediate disorder regime for a directed polymer model on a hierarchical lattice, Stoch. Process. Appl. 127, 3291-3330 (2017)

work page 2017

[5] [2]

Alberts, K

T. Alberts, K. Khanin, J. Quastel: The intermediate disorder regime for directed polymers in dimension 1 + 1, Ann. Probab. 42, No. 3, 1212-1256 (2014)

work page 2014

[6] [3]

Alberts, K

T. Alberts, K. Khanin, J. Quastel: The continuum directed random polymer, J. Stat. Phys. 154, No. 1-2, 305-326 (2014)

2014

[7] [4]

Caravenna, R

F. Caravenna, R. Sun, and N. Zygouras: Polynomial chaos and scaling limits of disordered sys- tems, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 19, 1-65 (2017)

work page 2017

[8] [5]

Caravenna, R

F. Caravenna, R. Sun, and N. Zygouras: Universality in marginally relevant disordered systems , Ann. Appl. Probab. 27, No. 5, 3050-3112 (2017)

work page 2017