The fractional porous medium equation on manifolds with conical singularities II

Nikolaos Roidos; Yuanzhen Shao

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 53 references

The fractional porous medium equation on manifolds with conical singularities II

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The fractional porous medium equation has a unique global strong solution on manifolds with conical singularities for every bounded initial datum, every $m>0$, and every $\sigma\in(0,1)$.

desk verdict First real well-posedness result for the fractional porous medium equation on conical manifolds; the proof is mostly solid, but the weak-to-strong step rests on an unverified imported regularity estimate that a good referee should make the authors address. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07138 v5 pith:IXCTBJIC submitted 2019-08-20 math.AP

Nikolaos Roidos , Yuanzhen Shao This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 26A3335K6535K6735R0135R1176S05

keywords fractionalporousmediumequationconicalsingularitiesMellin-SobolevspacesMarkovianextensionsLaplacianpowersnonlinearsemigroupsL^pcontractionconservationofmass

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that the fractional porous medium equation $\partial_t u+(-\Delta_g)^\sigma(|u|^{m-1}u)=0$ is globally well-posed on compact Riemannian manifolds with isolated conical singularities. For every $u_0\in L^\infty(M)$, every $\sigma\in(0,1)$, and every $m>0$, there is a unique global strong solution, and the solution has the qualitative properties one expects from a porous-medium flow: continuous dependence on the initial data in $C([0,T),L^1(M))$, a comparison principle, $L^p$-contraction for $1\le p\le\infty$, and conservation of mass. The paper's contribution is to carry the theory of this nonlocal, degenerate diffusion equation from Euclidean and smooth-manifold settings to spaces with a singular geometry, where the fractional Laplacian has no canonical closed extension. A sympathetic reader would care because conical singularities are the simplest model of a nonsmooth space, and the proof isolates exactly which analytic ingredients are needed to make sense of the equation there.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is a chain of four constructions. First, the Mellin-Sobolev spaces $H^{s,\gamma}_p(M)$--weighted Sobolev spaces whose weights are powers of the distance to the singularity--provide compact embeddings and Sobolev-Poincar\'e, Nash, and Super-Poincar\'e inequalities with weights. Second, the conical Laplacian $\Delta_g$ is shown to have a unique Markovian extension $\Delta_F$, the minimal self-adjoint extension generating a positive $L^\infty$-contractive semigroup, and this extension transfers to $L^p$ as $\Delta_{F,p}$. Third, the fractional powers $(\omega-\Delta_{F,p})^\sigma$ are built by resolvent-integral formulas and verified to be Markovian, positive, and resolvent-regular, with the domain inclusion $D((-\Delta_F)^\sigma)\hookrightarrow L^p(M)$ compact. Fourth, the nonlinear operator $u\mapsto(\omega-\Delta_{F,1})^\sigma\Phi(u)$ is shown to be $m$-accretive and densely defined in $L^1(M)$, so the nonlinear semigroup theorem yields global mild solutions; a careful $\omega\to0$ limit, using the compact embedding and a regularizing estimate for $L^1$ time increments, turns these into weak and then strong solutions.

What would settle it

Run the implicit time-discretization scheme (5.4) on a flat cone with $n=1$, $B=S^1$, $m=1/2$, $\sigma=1/2$, and an $L^\infty$ initial datum, and check whether $\frac{1}{h}\|u_\omega(t+h)-u_\omega(t)\|_1$ stays below $\frac{2}{|m-1|t}\|u_0\|_1+o(1)$; a violation would falsify the strong-solution theorem. Alternatively, verify whether $D((-\Delta_F)^\sigma)$ compacts into $L^p(M)$ at an indicial root on the critical line; failure there breaks the $\omega\to0$ identification of the weak limit.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is Theorem 1.1: on an $(n+1)$-dimensional conical manifold $(M,g)$, for any $u_0\in L^\infty(M)$, $\sigma\in(0,1)$, and $m>0$, equation (1.1) has a unique global strong solution, with continuous dependence on $u_0$ in $C([0,T),L^1(M))$, comparison principle, $L^p$-contraction for all $1\le p\le\infty$, and conservation of mass. The construction works by writing the equation in $L^1(M)$ with the accretive operator $A(u)=(-\Delta_{F,1})^\sigma\Phi(u)$, where $\Phi(u)=|u|^{m-1}u$; proving $A$ is $m$-accretive and densely defined; generating a unique mild solution by implicit time discretization; then showing these solutions converge as the regularizing parameter $\omega\to0$ in $(\omega-\Delta_{F,1})^\sigma$ to a weak solution of the original problem, and finally upgrading the weak solution to a strong one using time-regularity estimates. The same result is obtained for $\sigma=1$ in Section 8, recovering the classical porous medium equation on conical manifolds.

Load-bearing premise

The proof leans on two imported facts: the conical Laplacian's Markovian extension has a domain made of the minimal domain plus finitely many special singular functions, and the fractional-power domains embed compactly into $L^p$; if either fails on a particular cone, the passage from approximating solutions to a true strong solution can break.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For every bounded initial datum, every $m>0$, and every $\sigma\in(0,1)$, the flow is globally defined and unique, so no finite-time blow-up or non-uniqueness can occur for bounded data on conical manifolds.
The solution map is continuous in $C([0,T),L^1(M))$ and contractive, so approximating and numerical schemes built on the implicit discretization are stable.
Order is preserved and all $L^p$ norms decay or stay constant, while total mass is conserved; for $m<1$, this mass conservation distinguishes the conical setting from Euclidean or bounded-domain fractional porous media, where finite-time extinction can occur.
The same construction with $\sigma=1$ gives the analogous well-posedness theorem for the classical porous medium equation on conical manifolds, as stated in Theorem 8.1.
The method does not rely on Euclidean integral representations of the fractional Laplacian, so the framework extends to manifolds with more general singularities, including cuspidal, edge, and corner singularities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the Markovian-extension route is as robust as the paper suggests, the same $\omega\to0$ approximation should prove well-posedness for other fractional nonlinear diffusion equations, such as a fractional $p$-Laplacian flow; a first test would be to rerun the Section 4 construction with a uniformly elliptic cone operator that has a self-adjoint Markovian extension.
The compact embedding $D((-\Delta_F)^\sigma)\hookrightarrow L^p(M)$ is likely the quantitative engine behind all smoothing effects; tracking the constants in the Nash and Super-Poincar\'e inequalities could yield explicit decay rates such as $\|u(t)\|_\infty\le Ct^{-\alpha}$ for $m>1$, which the paper defers to a sequel.
Conservation of mass combined with the comparison principle suggests that for $m<1$ the conical geometry suppresses finite-time extinction and instead produces a nonlocal smoothing profile; this could be tested numerically on a flat cone $(0,1)\times S^n$.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a real advance. It treats the fractional porous medium equation on compact manifolds with conical singularities for all m > 0 and L^infinity initial data, and gets uniqueness, Lp-contraction, comparison, and conservation of mass. Section 8's parallel treatment of sigma = 1 is a useful extension. The Mellin-Sobolev inequalities and the Markovian extension analysis are independent contributions of their own. The overall strategy—Dirichlet forms, Crandall-Liggett generation, the Brezis-Strauss lemma, and the Schrohe-Seiler domain decomposition—is coherent and credible. The citation pattern is normal: the paper leans on its own companion papers and on standard nonlinear semigroup references, and that is appropriate here.

The main soft spot is exactly where the stress-test note points. The step from weak to strong solution in Section 7 uses the regularizing estimate (5.20), imported from Bénilan-Crandall [9, Theorem 1] and [38, Proposition 8.1]. The hypotheses of that theorem are not verified for the regularized operators A_omega = (omega - Delta_F,1)^sigma Phi. The paper proves m-accretivity and density of the domain, but Bénilan-Crandall needs more, and I do not see a check that the family is completely accretive or that the estimate is uniform as omega -> 0. If that uniformity fails, (5.23) and the conclusion partial_t u in L^infty_loc((0,T), L^1) do not follow. I think the gap is closable: the semigroup is Markovian, which should give the needed complete accretivity, and homogeneity is built into Phi. But the authors need to spell it out rather than citing the theorem as though the conical setting were the Euclidean one.

The secondary gap at (5.26) is real but minor: the compact embedding stated in (4.8) is for D((-Delta_F)^sigma), while the available bound is in D((-Delta_F)^(sigma/2)). Interpolation and compactness of D(Delta_F) in L^2 fix it, but that argument should be written down. There are also small typos, for example in the norm display in Lemma 3.8, and the application of [11, Theorem 1.1] in Section 7 is asserted rather than checked.

None of this made me doubt the main theorem. It made me want a careful referee. This is a paper for people working on nonlinear nonlocal diffusion on singular spaces, and also for anyone needing Mellin-Sobolev inequalities. It deserves serious refereeing. I would send it out and ask the authors to verify the imported regularity estimates or, failing that, to state the strong-solution result in the weaker form that their verified estimates actually support.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the fractional porous medium equation ∂_t u + (−Δ_g)^σ(|u|^{m−1}u)=0 on compact (n+1)-dimensional Riemannian manifolds with isolated conical singularities, for σ∈(0,1) and m>0. It first develops Mellin–Sobolev space techniques, including a Rellich–Kondrachov theorem and Sobolev–Poincaré, Nash, and super-Poincaré inequalities. It then studies closed extensions of the conical Laplacian, proves that the Friedrichs extension is the unique Markovian extension, constructs fractional powers of the conical Laplacian, and establishes compactness properties for their domains. The main result, Theorem 1.1, asserts that for any u0∈L∞(M) there is a unique global strong solution, with continuous dependence in C([0,T),L1(M)), comparison, Lp-contraction, and conservation of mass. The proof proceeds by regularizing with ω>0, applying nonlinear semigroup theory (Brézis–Strauss and Crandall–Liggett) to obtain ω-mild solutions, passing to the limit ω→0 to obtain a weak solution, and finally using Bénilan–Crandall regularizing estimates and Steklov averages to upgrade to strong solutions. Section 8 states analogous results for the classical porous medium equation σ=1.

Significance. If the main theorem is correct, this is a substantial contribution: it gives the first complete well-posedness and qualitative theory for the fractional porous medium equation on conical singularities, and it combines several nontrivial tools—Mellin–Sobolev compact embeddings, Dirichlet-form/Markovian-extension theory, fractional powers of the conical Laplacian, and nonlinear semigroup methods—in a reusable way. The paper is explicit about the role of the Markovian extension and provides concrete functional inequalities that are likely to be useful beyond this problem. However, the strong-solution claim depends on imported regularizing estimates whose hypotheses are not verified in the conical setting, and the ω→0 compactness step uses a domain mismatch that is repairable but not stated. These issues are load-bearing for the central claim and require correction before the result can be regarded as established.

major comments (3)

[§5, Eq. (5.20)] Equation (5.20) is a crucial regularizing estimate: it is used in (5.23) to obtain a uniform-in-ω bound on ||(ω−Δ_g)^{σ/2}Φ(u_ω)(t)||_2 and thereby to justify the ω→0 passage. The text says it holds by following the proof of [9, Theorem 1] and using (5.19). No verification is given that the operator A_ω(u)=(ω−Δ_{F,1})^σ Φ(u) satisfies the hypotheses of [9, Theorem 1] for each fixed ω—in particular complete accretivity and positive homogeneity of degree m—and the estimate is needed uniformly in ω. The paper proves only m-accretivity of A_ω via Proposition 4.4, which is not sufficient for the cited theorem. This is a load-bearing gap in the proof of weak-solution regularity.
[§7, after Definition 7.1] The proof of strong regularity asserts, by [9, Theorems 1 and 2], that ∂_t u is a Radon measure and that the limsup bound (ii) holds for the limiting solution u of (1.1). This requires an m-accretive realization of A_0(u)=(−Δ_g)^σ Φ(u) on L^1(M), or an equivalent argument that the regularizing estimates for A_ω pass to the limit with constants independent of ω; neither is supplied. The subsequent application of [11, Theorem 1.1] to conclude ∂_t u∈L^∞_loc((0,T),L^1(M)) from u∈BV((τ,T),L^1(M)) also assumes hypotheses that are not checked for the conical setting. Consequently the 'strong solution' clause of Theorem 1.1 is not established by the text as written.
[§5, around (5.26)] The compactness passage Φ(u_{ω_k})(t)→v(t) in L^2(M) is justified by Proposition 4.6, whose compact embedding statement (4.8) is for D((−Δ_F)^σ). The uniform bound available from (5.24) is in D((−Δ_F)^{σ/2}). The needed compactness for the σ/2-domain follows from the same interpolation and Rellich–Kondrachov argument used in Proposition 4.5, but it is not stated. This is a repairable but real gap in the ω→0 limiting argument.

minor comments (5)

[§5, Eq. (5.22)] In the displayed inequality after (5.21), the time integral on the left is written with 'dt' but the integrand contains 's'; it should be 'ds' (or the outer variable should be renamed).
[§5, Eqs. (5.15)–(5.16)] The estimate corresponding to (4.4) is used with the half-power σ/2, but the analogous inequality for (ω−Δ)^{σ/2}−(−Δ)^{σ/2} is not displayed. It is true by the same argument and should be stated.
[Theorem 7.3 and Theorem 8.2] There is a typo 'in the the norm' in the statements of both theorems; it should be 'in the norm'.
[Remark 6.3] The remark refers to an 'anti-cone' and to conservation of mass on components without defining the term or giving a proof; it should either be expanded or removed.
[Proposition 4.5] The statement 'D((−Δ_F)^σ) ↪ H^{2σ−ε,σ+δσ−ε}_2(M)+Cω for any ε>0' should specify that ε is taken small enough so that the displayed Sobolev exponents remain meaningful; otherwise the notation is misleading when σ is small.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the main proof chain is carried by external theorems and in-paper arguments; self-citations are contextual only.

full rationale

I traced the main derivation chain: (i) Mellin-Sobolev compactness and Poincare/Nash inequalities are proved in Sections 2-3; (ii) the domain decomposition for Delta_F is imported from Schrohe-Seiler [48, Cor. 5.4], an external published result; (iii) fractional powers and their resolvent/Markovian properties are derived from the semigroup theory of Davies and Balakrishnan/Tanabe; (iv) m-accretivity of A(u) = (omega - Delta)^sigma Phi(u) follows from the Brezis-Strauss lemma [16] applied to the operator constructed in the paper; (v) existence and uniqueness of mild/weak solutions follow from Crandall-Liggett [23]; (vi) regularity uses Benilan-Crandall [9] and Benilan-Gariepy [11]. The self-citations that occur ([43], [45], [49]) are contextual, historical, or technical but are not the load-bearing source of the central theorem: the domain decomposition, the generation theorem, the Brezis-Strauss lemma, and the Benilan-Crandall regularizing estimate are all independent published external works. I found no equation or theorem that is defined in terms of the target result, and no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The reviewer-flagged concern that the hypotheses of [9] are not explicitly verified for the regularized family A_omega is a correctness or gap issue, not a circularity: the cited theorem is not an input equivalent to Theorem 1.1. Consequently, the paper's derivation is self-contained relative to the cited literature and does not exhibit circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on well-established operator theory and nonlinear semigroup theory; no fitted parameters or invented entities appear. The main assumptions are the domain structure of the conical Laplacian from prior literature and the transfer of standard regularity theorems to the conical setting.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Closed extensions of the conical Laplacian have the domain structure D(Delta_max) = D(Delta_min) plus the spaces E_{q_j} described by the indicial roots (equations 3.7 and 4.9).
Imported from [48, Proposition 5.1] and [30, Theorem 3.6]; used to characterize D(Delta_F) and to prove compact embeddings in Propositions 4.5 and 4.6.
standard math The weighted Hardy inequality (equation 3.12) holds on the conical collar region.
Quoted from [32]; used in Lemma 3.8 to identify the domain of the Dirichlet form with a Mellin-Sobolev space.
standard math The theory of Dirichlet forms links Markovian semigroups to Markovian closed forms (Beurling-Deny conditions from [29]).
Used in Propositions 3.4 and 3.9 to prove the heat semigroup is Markovian and that the Markovian extension is unique.
domain assumption Crandall-Liggett and Brezis-Strauss nonlinear semigroup theorems apply to the operator A(u) = (omega-Delta_{F,1})^sigma Phi(u) on L^1(M).
The verifications in Section 5 (Proposition 4.4, Lemma 5.2) reduce to checking m-accretivity and density of the domain, which rely on the Markovian properties established earlier.
domain assumption The regularizing effects of [9, Theorem 1] and [11, Theorem 1.1] hold for the mild solutions of the omega-regularized problem on the conical manifold.
Used at (5.20) and Section 7 to obtain BV regularity and strong solution regularity; the hypotheses are not fully re-derived in the conical setting.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The fractional porous medium equation on manifolds with conical singularities II." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IXCTBJIC

@misc{pith2026190807138,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The fractional porous medium equation on manifolds with conical singularities II},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IXCTBJIC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07138}
}

abstract

This is the second of a series of two papers which studies the fractional porous medium equation, $\partial_t u +(-\Delta)^\sigma (|u|^{m-1}u )=0 $ with $m>0$ and $\sigma\in (0,1]$, posed on a Riemannian manifold with isolated conical singularities. The first aim of the article is to derive some useful properties for the Mellin-Sobolev spaces including the Rellich-Kondrachov Theorem and Sobolev-Poincar\'e, Nash and Super Poincar\'e type inequalities. The second part of the article is devoted to the study the Markovian extensions of the conical Laplacian operator and its fractional powers. Then based on the obtained results, we establish existence and uniqueness of a global strong solution for $L_\infty-$initial data and all $m>0$. We further investigate a number of properties of the solutions, including comparison principle, $L_p-$contraction and conservation of mass. Our approach is quite general and thus is applicable to a variety of similar problems on manifolds with more general singularities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

[1]

Akagi, G

G. Akagi, G. Schimperna, A. Segatti, Fractional Cahn-Hi lliard, Allen-Cahn and porous medium equations. J. Diﬀerential Equations 261, no. 6, 2935-2985 (2016)

work page 2016
[2]

C´ ordoba,´A.D

D.Alonso-Or´ an, A. C´ ordoba,´A.D. Mart ´ ınez, Integral representation for fractional La place- Beltrami operators. Adv. Math. 328, 436-445 (2018)

work page 2018
[3]

Alphonse, C.M

A. Alphonse, C.M. Elliott, W ell-posedness of a fraction al porous medium equation on an evolving surface. Nonlinear Anal. 137, 3-42 (2016)

work page 2016
[4]

Amann, Linear and Quasilinear Parabolic Problems: Vo lume I

H. Amann, Linear and Quasilinear Parabolic Problems: Vo lume I. Abstract Linear Theory. Monographs in Mathematics, 89. Birkh¨ auser Boston, Inc., B oston, MA, 1995

work page 1995
[5]

Arendt, A

W. Arendt, A. Grabosch, G. Greiner, U. Groh, H.P. Lotz, U. Moustakas, R. Nagel, F. Neubrander, U. Schlotterbeck, One-Parameter Semigroups o f Positive Operators. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1184. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986

work page 1986
[6]

Balakrishnan, Fractional powers of closed operato rs and the semi-groups generated by them, Paciﬁc J

A.V. Balakrishnan, Fractional powers of closed operato rs and the semi-groups generated by them, Paciﬁc J. Math. 10, 419-437 (1960)

work page 1960
[7]

Banica, M.d.M

V. Banica, M.d.M. Gonz´ alez, M. S´ aez, Some constructio ns for the fractional Laplacian on noncompact manifolds. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 31, no. 2, 681-712 (2015)

work page 2015
[8]

Barbu, Nonlinear semigroups and diﬀerential equatio ns in Banach spaces

V. Barbu, Nonlinear semigroups and diﬀerential equatio ns in Banach spaces. Translated from the Romanian. Editura Academiei Republicii Socialist e Romˆ ania, Bucharest; Noordhoﬀ International Publishing, Leiden, 1976

work page 1976

Show all 53 references

[9]

B´ enilan, M.G

P. B´ enilan, M.G. Crandall, Regularizing eﬀects of homo geneous evolution equations. In “Con- tributions to analysis and geometry (Baltimore, Md., 1980) , pp. 23-39, Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, Md., 1981

1980
[10]

B´ enilan, M.G

P. B´ enilan, M.G. Crandall, The continuous dependence onψ of solutions of ut − ∆ ψ (u) = 0. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 30, no. 2, 161-177 (1981). THE FRACTIONAL POROUS MEDIUM EQUATION ON CONICAL MANIFOLDS II 35

1981
[11]

B´ enilan, R

P. B´ enilan, R. Gariepy, Strong solutions in L1 of degenerate parabolic equations. J. Diﬀer- ential Equations 119, no. 2, 473-502 (1995)

1995
[12]

Bonforte, Y

M. Bonforte, Y. Sire, J.L. V´ azquez, Existence, unique ness and asymptotic behaviour for fractional porous medium equations onbounded domains. Dis crete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 35, no. 12, 5725-5767 (2015)

2015
[13]

Bonforte, J.L

M. Bonforte, J.L. V´ azquez, A priori estimates for frac tional nonlinear degenerate diﬀusion equations on bounded domains. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 218, no. 1, 317-362 (2015)

2015
[14]

Bonforte, J.L

M. Bonforte, J.L. V´ azquez, Fractional nonlinear dege nerate diﬀusion equations on bounded domains part I. Existence, uniqueness and upper bounds. Non linear Anal. 131, 363-398 (2016)

2016
[15]

Boscain, D

U. Boscain, D. Prandi, Self-adjoint extensions and sto chastic completeness of the Laplace- Beltrami operator on conic and anticonic surfaces. J. Diﬀer ential Equations 260, no. 4, 3234- 3269 (2016)

2016
[16]

Br´ ezis, W.A

H. Br´ ezis, W.A. Strauss, Semi-linear second-order el liptic equations in L1. J. Math. Soc. Japan 25, 565-590 (1973)

1973
[17]

Br¨ uning, R

J. Br¨ uning, R. Seeley, An index theorem for ﬁrst order r egular singular operators. Amer. J. Math. 110, 659–714 (1988)

1988
[18]

Caﬀarelli, L.E

L.A. Caﬀarelli, L.E. Silvestre, An extension problem r elated to the fractional laplacian. Com- munications in Partial Diﬀerential Equations, 32, no. 8, 1245-1260 (2007)

2007
[19]

Chang, M.d.M

A. Chang, M.d.M. Gonzalez, Fracional Laplacian in conf ormal geometry. Advances in Math- ematics, 226, no. 2, 1410-1432 (2011)

2011
[20]

H. Chen, X. Liu, Y. W ei, Cone Sobolev inequality and Diri chlet problem for nonlinear elliptic equations on a manifold with conical singularities. Calc. V ar. Partial Diﬀerential Equations 43, no. 3-4, 463-484 (2012)

2012
[21]

Coriasco, E

S. Coriasco, E. Schrohe, J. Seiler, J. Diﬀerential oper ators on conic manifolds: maximal regularity and parabolic equations. Hommage ´ a Pascal Laub in. Bull. Soc. Roy. Sci. Li´ ege 70 (2001), no. 4-6, 207-229 (2002)

2001
[22]

Coriasco, E

S. Coriasco, E. Schrohe, J. Seiler, Bounded imaginary p owers of diﬀerential operators on manifolds with conical singularities. Math. Zeitschrift 244, 235-269 (2003)

2003
[23]

Crandall, T.M

M.G. Crandall, T.M. Liggett, Generation of Semi-Group s of Nonlinear Transformations on General Banach Spaces. Amer. J. Math. 93, 265-298 (1971)

1971
[24]

Davies, One-Parameter Semigroups.London Mathem atical Society Monographs, 15

E.B. Davies, One-Parameter Semigroups.London Mathem atical Society Monographs, 15. Aca- demic Press, Inc., London-New York, 1980

1980
[25]

Davies, Heat Kernels and Spectral Theory

E.B. Davies, Heat Kernels and Spectral Theory. Cambrid ge Tracts in Mathematics, 92. Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989

1989
[26]

R. Denk, M. Hieber, J. Pr¨ uss, R-boundedness, Fourier multipliers and Problems of Ellipti c and Parabolic Type. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 166, no. 788, 2003

2003
[27]

Engel, R

K.J. Engel, R. Nagel, A Short Course on Operator Semigro ups. Universitext. Springer, New York, 2006

2006
[28]

M. Fan, S. Li, L. Zhang, W eak solution of the equation for a fractional porous medium with a forcing term. Comput. Math. Appl. 67, no. 1, 145-150 (2014)

2014
[29]

Fukushima, Y

M. Fukushima, Y. Oshima, M. Takeda, Masayoshi, Dirichl et Forms and Symmetric Markov Processes. Second revised and extended edition. De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, 19. W alter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 2011

2011
[30]

J. Gil, T. Krainer, G. Mendoza. Resolvents of elliptic c one operators. J. Funct. Anal. 241, no. 1, 1-55 (2006)

2006
[31]

M. Haase. A functional calculus description of real int erpolation spaces for sectorial operators. Studia Math. 171, no.2, 177-195 (2005)

2005
[32]

Littlewood, G

G.H.Hardy, , J.E. Littlewood, G. P´ olya, Inequalities . 2d ed. Cambridge, at the University Press, 1952

1952
[33]

Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, Spr inger-Verlag, Berlin, 1980

T. Kato, Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, Spr inger-Verlag, Berlin, 1980

1980
[34]

Lesch, Operators of Fuchs type, conical singularities, and asympt otic methods

M. Lesch, Operators of Fuchs type, conical singularities, and asympt otic methods. Teubner- Texte zur Mathematik [Teubner Texts in Mathematics], 136. B . G. Teubner Verlagsge- sellschaft mbH, Stuttgart, 1997

1997
[35]

Li, Estimations du noyau de la chaleur sur les varit s coniques et applications

H.Q. Li, Estimations du noyau de la chaleur sur les varit s coniques et applications. Bull. Sci. math., 124, no. 5, 365-384 (2000)

2000
[36]

Lunardi, Analytic Semigroups and Optimal Regularit y in Parabolic Problems

A. Lunardi, Analytic Semigroups and Optimal Regularit y in Parabolic Problems. Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, 1995. 36 N. ROIDOS AND Y. SHAO

1995
[37]

Pablo, F

A. Pablo, F. Quir´ os, A. Rodr ´ ıguez, J.L. V´ azquez, A fractional porous medium equation. Adv. Math. 226, no. 2, 1378-1409 (2011)

2011
[38]

Pablo, F

A. Pablo, F. Quir´ os, A. Rodr ´ ıguez, J.L. V´ azquez, A general fractional porous medium equa- tion, Comm. Pure Applied Math. 65, 1242-1284 (2012)

2012
[39]

Pazy, Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applicatio ns to Partial Diﬀerential Equations

A. Pazy, Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applicatio ns to Partial Diﬀerential Equations. Applied Mathematical Sciences 44. Springer-Verlag, New Yo rk. 1983

1983
[40]

Pr¨ uss, G

J. Pr¨ uss, G. Simonett, Moving Interfaces and Quasilin ear Parabolic Evolution Equations. Monographs in Mathematics. Birkh¨ auser Verlag. 2016

2016
[41]

Punzo, G

F. Punzo, G. Terrone, On the Cauchy problem for a general fractional porous medium equa- tion with variable density. Nonlinear Anal. 98, 27-47 (2014)

2014
[42]

Roidos, E

N. Roidos, E. Schrohe, Bounded imaginary powers of cone diﬀerential operators on higher order Mellin-Sobolev spaces and applications to the Cahn-H illiard equation. J. Diﬀerential Equations 257, no. 3, 611-637 (2014)

2014
[43]

Roidos, E

N. Roidos, E. Schrohe, Existence and maximal Lp-regularity of solutions for the porous medium equation on manifolds with conical singularities. C omm. Partial Diﬀerential Equa- tions 41, no. 9, 1441-1471 (2016)

2016
[44]

Roidos, E

N. Roidos, E. Schrohe, Smoothness and long time existen ce for solutions of the porous medium equation on manifolds with conical singularities. Comm. Pa rtial Diﬀerential Equations 43, no. 10, 1456-1484 (2018)

2018
[45]

Roidos, Y

N. Roidos, Y. Shao, The fractional porous medium equati on on manifolds with conical sin- gularities I. arXiv:1908.06915

1908 arXiv
[46]

Roidos, Y

N. Roidos, Y. Shao, Functional Inequalities involving Nonlocal Operators on Complete Rie- mannian Manifolds and Their Applications to The Fractional Porous Medium Equation. In preparation
[47]

Schrohe, J

E. Schrohe, J. Seiler. Ellipticity and invertibility i n the cone algebra on Lp-Sobolev spaces. Integral Equations Operator Theory 41, 93-114 (2001)

2001
[48]

Schrohe, J

E. Schrohe, J. Seiler, The resolvent of closed extensio ns of cone diﬀerential operators. Canad. J. Math. 57, no. 4, 771-811 (2005)

2005
[49]

Shao, Continuous maximal regularity on singular man ifolds and its applications

Y. Shao, Continuous maximal regularity on singular man ifolds and its applications. Evol. Equ. Control Theory 5, no. 2, 303-335 (2016)

2016
[50]

Shao, The Yamabe ﬂow on incomplete manifolds

Y. Shao, The Yamabe ﬂow on incomplete manifolds. J. Evol . Equ. 18, no. 4, 1595-1632 (2018)

2018
[51]

Tanabe, Equations of evolution

H. Tanabe, Equations of evolution. Monographs and stud ies in mathematics 6, Pitman Pub- lishing, 1979

1979
[52]

V´ azquez, The Porous Medium Equation

J.L. V´ azquez, The Porous Medium Equation. Mathematic al Theory, Oxford Mathematical Monographs. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007

2007
[53]

W eidmann, Linear Operators in Hilbert Spaces

J. W eidmann, Linear Operators in Hilbert Spaces. Gradu ate Texts in Mathematics, 68. Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1980. Department of Mathematics, University of Patras, 26504 Rio P atras, Greece E-mail address : roidos@math.upatras.gr Department of Mathematics, The Unive...

1980

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Akagi, G

G. Akagi, G. Schimperna, A. Segatti, Fractional Cahn-Hi lliard, Allen-Cahn and porous medium equations. J. Diﬀerential Equations 261, no. 6, 2935-2985 (2016)

work page 2016

[2] [2]

C´ ordoba,´A.D

D.Alonso-Or´ an, A. C´ ordoba,´A.D. Mart ´ ınez, Integral representation for fractional La place- Beltrami operators. Adv. Math. 328, 436-445 (2018)

work page 2018

[3] [3]

Alphonse, C.M

A. Alphonse, C.M. Elliott, W ell-posedness of a fraction al porous medium equation on an evolving surface. Nonlinear Anal. 137, 3-42 (2016)

work page 2016

[4] [4]

Amann, Linear and Quasilinear Parabolic Problems: Vo lume I

H. Amann, Linear and Quasilinear Parabolic Problems: Vo lume I. Abstract Linear Theory. Monographs in Mathematics, 89. Birkh¨ auser Boston, Inc., B oston, MA, 1995

work page 1995

[5] [5]

Arendt, A

W. Arendt, A. Grabosch, G. Greiner, U. Groh, H.P. Lotz, U. Moustakas, R. Nagel, F. Neubrander, U. Schlotterbeck, One-Parameter Semigroups o f Positive Operators. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1184. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986

work page 1986

[6] [6]

Balakrishnan, Fractional powers of closed operato rs and the semi-groups generated by them, Paciﬁc J

A.V. Balakrishnan, Fractional powers of closed operato rs and the semi-groups generated by them, Paciﬁc J. Math. 10, 419-437 (1960)

work page 1960

[7] [7]

Banica, M.d.M

V. Banica, M.d.M. Gonz´ alez, M. S´ aez, Some constructio ns for the fractional Laplacian on noncompact manifolds. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 31, no. 2, 681-712 (2015)

work page 2015

[8] [8]

Barbu, Nonlinear semigroups and diﬀerential equatio ns in Banach spaces

V. Barbu, Nonlinear semigroups and diﬀerential equatio ns in Banach spaces. Translated from the Romanian. Editura Academiei Republicii Socialist e Romˆ ania, Bucharest; Noordhoﬀ International Publishing, Leiden, 1976

work page 1976