Iwasawa theory for $\mathrm{U}(r,s)$, Bloch-Kato conjecture and Functional Equation

Xin Wan

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 36 references

Iwasawa theory for $\mathrm{U}(r,s)$, Bloch-Kato conjecture and Functional Equation

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Vanishing central L-value forces positive Selmer rank for unitary groups U(r,s).

desk verdict A genuine extension of Skinner–Urban with a novel p-adic functional-equation mechanism, but the proof as written has two real gaps—Theorem 1.6/1.7 are sketched and the non-cancellation step in Proposition 6.19 is not shown—so the right verdict is conditional, not accept. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07205 v3 pith:6CHLRKWV submitted 2019-08-20 math.NT

Xin Wan This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.NT MSC 11F6711F7011R2311G40

keywords IwasawatheoryBloch-KatoconjectureunitarygroupsSelmerp-adicL-functionsEisensteinseriesfunctionalequationHida

topics Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves a Bloch-Kato nonvanishing statement for motives attached to regular algebraic cuspidal automorphic representations of unitary groups U(r,s) over a totally real field F, twisted by Hecke characters: if the central L-value vanishes, then the Selmer group has positive rank. This generalizes a previous theorem for F=Q and conjugate self-dual motives to general totally real base fields and general signature. The proof introduces p-adic functional equations for ordinary families of Klingen Eisenstein series and for p-adic L-functions, which connect the p-adic limit of the Eisenstein family at the critical point to a classical Eisenstein series whose nonvanishing can be checked. The method avoids the Fourier-Jacobi coefficient computations that limited earlier work to low-rank unitary groups.

What carries the argument

The engine is an ordinary Hida family of Klingen Eisenstein series on GU(r+1,s+1), a p-adic analytic family interpolating nearly ordinary Klingen Eisenstein series, together with new p-adic functional equations (Theorems 1.6 and 1.7). The Klingen equation says that a Maass-Shimura differential operator δ_{r+1,s+1} applied to the p-adic limit at the non-arithmetic point φ0 equals a classical Klingen Eisenstein series for the dual Eisenstein datum; the classical series is proved nonzero using the functional equation for degenerate principal series, the zeta-integral functional equation at an auxiliary prime, and the quasi-split theory of intertwining operators and standard-module reducibility. The p-adic L-function version extends the interpolation of the doubling-method p-adic L-functions to the left of the centre. The final Selmer step is the Eisenstein ideal and lattice construction, with the Iwasawa main conjecture for Hecke characters supplying control of an auxiliary characteristic ideal.

What would settle it

Find a regular algebraic cuspidal π on U(r,s)/F satisfying the assumptions with L(M∨(1),0)=0 but Sel_{p^∞}(M) of rank 0; equivalently, check at such a point whether the specialized ordinary Klingen Eisenstein family has at least one nonzero Fourier-Jacobi coefficient, since vanishing of all such coefficients would contradict the paper's nonvanishing proposition for the p-adic Klingen Eisenstein family.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 1.3 is the central claim: under assumptions (QS), (Irred), with 0 and 1 not Hodge-Tate weights of M, and with π unramified and ordinary above p, the equality L(M∨(1),0)=0 implies that the rank of the Selmer group Sel_{p^∞}(M) is positive. Equivalently, a Selmer group of rank 0 forces the central L-value to be nonzero. The author establishes this by specializing an ordinary Hida family of Klingen Eisenstein series to the non-arithmetic point φ0 where the p-adic L-function takes the central value, showing that the specialization is a nonzero p-adic limit form, and then using an Eisenstein ideal argument to convert this nonvanishing into a lower bound on the Selmer group rank.

Load-bearing premise

The proof is not fully unconditional: it relies on the endoscopic classification results of [17], in particular multiplicity one for cusp forms on U(r,s) under cuspidal base change and local-global compatibility of the base change map, which as the paper states depend on ongoing work on stabilization of trace formulas; if that work has a gap, the theorem's proof infrastructure breaks, while the main statement could still be true.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The Bloch-Kato rank-zero-nonvanishing implication now holds for general totally real base fields and general signature (r,s), not only for F=Q and conjugate self-dual motives.
The p-adic functional equation for p-adic L-functions extends the doubling-method interpolation formula to critical values on the left of the centre, thereby covering all critical values.
The p-adic functional equation for Klingen Eisenstein families gives a new nonvanishing criterion for p-adic Eisenstein families that does not require Fourier-Jacobi coefficient expansions, so it should apply to higher-rank unitary groups outside the low-rank cases.
If the Selmer group of M has rank 0, then L(M∨(1),0) is nonzero, constraining the vanishing order side of the Bloch-Kato conjecture at the central point.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same p-adic functional-equation mechanism should extend to finite-slope, non-ordinary Eisenstein families once finite-slope families and local triangulations of Galois representations are available; the author explicitly leaves this to future work.
Because the nonvanishing of the p-adic limit is reduced to a classical Eisenstein series, any zero of the p-adic L-function not explained by Selmer-rank reasons would have to appear as a zero of that classical series, giving a concrete interpretation of possible exceptional zeros.
If the quasi-split intertwining-operator results are proven for non-quasi-split inner forms, the quasi-split hypothesis (QS) should be removable, extending the theorem to every unitary group U(r,s) over F.
A similar pullback-plus-functional-equation strategy might transfer to other automorphic families, such as symplectic or orthogonal groups, where Fourier-Jacobi coefficients are not tractable but doubling or pullback formulas exist.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things you should know. First, this is not a repackaging of Skinner–Urban: it introduces a distinct mechanism—comparing a p-adic limit Klingen Eisenstein family with a classical Klingen Eisenstein series via p-adic functional equations—and that is what lets it drop F=Q and conjugate self-duality for U(r,s). Second, the proof as written has two real soft spots that keep it from being complete: Theorem 1.6 is stated without details, and Proposition 6.19 contains an uncomputed cancellation check in the constant term. The reader's conditional verdict is about right.

What is genuinely good. The Hida theory for non-cuspidal forms on U(r,s) in Section 3 is a real extension of Liu–Rosso, with the parallel weight space and ordinary cusp labels handled carefully. The auxiliary-prime construction in Section 4.8, using Godement–Jacquet to compute pullback sections, is clever and appears to deliver what is claimed. The interpolation formulas in Theorem 6.8 follow published constructions in [5] and [32] rather than fitting constants. No circularity: the target L-value nonvanishing is not inserted as an assumption.

Now the soft spots, in proportion. (1) The functional equations are load-bearing. Theorem 1.7 is justified by saying the proof of Theorem 6.8 also gives it, and Theorem 1.6 says the details are omitted. Since Proposition 6.19, and through it the Selmer-rank theorem, depends on Theorem 1.7, this is not a harmless omission. (2) In Proposition 6.19 the constant term has two summands, f_z and A(f)_{-z}, and the text moves from the Archimedean component to nonvanishing of the whole series without ruling out cancellation. The stress-test note is correct on this. (3) Remark 1.5 concedes dependence on Moeglin–Waldspurger trace-formula work via [17]; that makes the main theorem conditional, though not suspect. (4) Several local computations are called straightforward checking; they are probably right, but they cannot be certified from the text alone.

Bottom line. The outline is coherent, the new method is real, and the main claim is likely true once the missing details are supplied. This deserves a serious referee, not a desk reject. I would send it to peer review and ask the author to expand the proofs of Theorems 1.6 and 1.7 and to give an explicit constant-term computation before publication. I would also bring it to reading group.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a new Iwasawa-theoretic method for unitary groups U(r,s) over a totally real field F, using ordinary Hida families of Klingen Eisenstein series and p-adic functional equations. Its main theorem (Theorem 1.3) states that, under assumptions (QS), (Irred), ordinarity at all primes above p, and a Hodge-Tate weight condition, the vanishing of the central L-value L(M^∨(1),0) forces positive rank of the Selmer group Sel_{p^∞}(M). The method avoids Fourier-Jacobi coefficient computations by relating a p-adic limit form, obtained as a specialization of a Klingen Eisenstein family at a non-arithmetic point, to a classical Klingen Eisenstein series via p-adic functional equations, and then proving nonvanishing of the latter. The paper also claims p-adic functional equations for the corresponding p-adic L-functions and for the Klingen Eisenstein families (Theorems 1.6 and 1.7).

Significance. If the proof is completed, this would be a substantial advance: it removes the F=Q restriction and the conjugate self-duality assumption of Skinner-Urban's ICM 2006 result, and it introduces a new technique for studying Klingen Eisenstein families at non-classical points that has the potential to apply beyond the low-rank cases treated earlier. The paper also contains significant original work: a Hida theory for non-cuspidal forms on U(r,s), detailed local computations of pullback sections at an auxiliary prime, and a clean use of Casselman-Shahidi theory to analyze nonvanishing at special points. At the same time, the manuscript is explicit about several dependencies and omissions, and these gaps are load-bearing for the central claim.

major comments (4)

[§6.4, Theorem 1.6/1.7 and Remark 1.8] The proof of Theorem 1.7 is contained in a single paragraph that asserts 'the proof of Theorem 6.8 also gives Theorem 1.7', and the proof of Theorem 1.6 is explicitly omitted ('we omit the details'). Remark 1.8 further states that the precise formulas on the right-hand side of Theorem 1.6 are omitted. These p-adic functional equations are the central mechanism that allows the author to compare a non-arithmetic p-adic limit form with a classical Eisenstein series, and Proposition 6.19 depends directly on Theorem 1.7. As written, this is a missing proof of a load-bearing step, not a minor presentation issue.
[§6.5, Proposition 6.19] The nonvanishing of the classical Klingen Eisenstein series E^{C∞}_{Kling, D^{(2)}_{φ0}} is asserted from its constant term: 'By looking at the Archimedean component, we see that the constant term ... and thus E itself must be nonzero.' However, by Lemma 4.4 the constant term is the sum f_z + A(f)_{-z}, and the text gives no computation ruling out cancellation between these two summands at z = 1/2. Since this nonvanishing is the input to the Selmer-rank argument via Proposition 6.19, a concrete verification of non-cancellation (for example, by comparing Archimedean K-types or by computing explicit Fourier coefficients) is required.
[§1, Remark 1.5] The main theorem is conditional on results from [17] on Arthur conjectures, specifically multiplicity one for cuspidal forms on U(r,s) under cuspidal base change and local-global compatibility of the base change map, which the author notes depend on ongoing work of Moeglin-Waldspurger on stabilization of trace formulas. Until that work is available, the proof of Theorem 1.3 is not unconditional. This is acknowledged honestly, but the statement of Theorem 1.3 should be labeled explicitly as conditional on these results, and the precise locations in the proof that invoke them should be listed.
[§6.5, Proposition 6.17] In the case where ∏_{v∈Σ} L_v(π,τ^c,-z) has poles, the argument says these poles 'are cancelled by poles provided by Lemma 6.15', but Lemma 6.15 only guarantees that the intertwining operator has a pole of at least the same multiplicity. To conclude nonvanishing of the pullback section, one must also check that the leading coefficients of the poles do not cancel and that the resulting finite value is nonzero. The text asserts this from local computations, but no such leading-coefficient computation is shown. This is another load-bearing point in the nonvanishing argument and needs to be filled in.

minor comments (5)

[Throughout] There are numerous typographical and formatting issues, including the title spacing in the text ('Iw asa w a theory forU'), the spelling 'Moeglin-Waldspurger' (usually 'Mœglin-Waldspurger'), and several unbalanced parentheses in long displayed formulas; these should be corrected in a final revision.
[§3.3] The citation 'By [ ?, Corollary 6.2.2.8]' contains an unresolved placeholder reference; please replace it with the full reference.
[§4.8, Lemma 4.26] The proof of the existence of an auxiliary prime v with pairwise distinct Satake parameters is compressed to two sentences. It should spell out the Chebotarev argument and explicitly justify that the ordinarity assumption gives distinct Satake parameters at p so that the nearby-eigenvalue argument applies.
[§6.2, Theorem 6.8(i)] The displayed formula in part (i) uses notation 'ss2' without a clear definition and appears to have unmatched parentheses; please rewrite this formula cleanly and define all quantities such as s_1 and s_2 in the surrounding text.
[§6.2, Deﬁnition 6.6] The definition of the I[[Γ_K^+]]-valued characters ξ_i says 'We omit the precise formula since it requires introducing unnecessary notations.' Since these ξ_i are used in the interpolation formulas (30) and (31), a precise or referenced definition is needed for the reader to verify the interpolation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the p-adic families, functional equations, and nonvanishing computations are independent of the Selmer-rank conclusion; the proof's weaknesses are omitted details, not circular reductions.

full rationale

The central derivation proceeds from the Eischen-Harris-Li-Skinner and Wan constructions of p-adic L-functions and ordinary Klingen Eisenstein families ([5], [32]), whose constant terms are divisible by the p-adic L-function. At the point φ0 where the central L-value is assumed zero, the paper does not use that zero as a fitted parameter; instead Theorem 1.7 transfers the non-classical specialization φ0(E_Kling) under a Maass-Shimura operator to a classical Klingen Eisenstein series, and Propositions 6.17 and 6.19 establish nonvanishing from local intertwining-operator and Casselman-Shahidi computations plus an Archimedean constant-term check. The Eisenstein-ideal argument (Lemma 7.2, Theorem 7.5) then turns the nonzero specialization into a positive Selmer corank. None of these steps restates the target L-value nonvanishing or the Selmer-rank assertion by construction. The reliance on [32] is a self-citation, but [32] is a published, parameter-free construction whose assumptions do not include the present theorem, so it counts as independent support. The paper itself flags incompleteness: Remark 1.8 says 'We omit the precise formulas' for Theorem 1.6, and the Section 6.4 proof says 'the proof of Theorem 6.8 also gives Theorem 1.7' with details left to the reader; Proposition 6.19's 'By looking at the Archimedean component' is likewise terse. These are gaps in exposition or proof that affect the paper's completeness, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted constants or postulated physical entities. The auxiliary choices, such as an integer b and an auxiliary prime vaux, are existence choices rather than parameters fitted to data. The central claim rests on standard theorems and on domain assumptions including (Irred), (QS), ordinarity, Hodge-Tate exclusion, and external Arthur/trace-formula results.

assumptions (7)

domain assumption Residual Galois representation \bar{\rho}_\pi of G_K is absolutely irreducible (Irred).
Invoked in Section 2 to ensure uniqueness of the Galois-stable lattice T and to construct Hida families with a Galois representation; without it the Selmer comparison and family construction break.
domain assumption At each prime v of F, if L_v(\tilde{\pi},\bar{\tau}^c,-1/2) has a pole then U(r,s)(F_v) is quasi-split (QS).
Needed in Section 6.5 to apply Casselman-Shahidi theory on intertwining operators and prove nonvanishing of the pullback section.
domain assumption π is unramified and ordinary at all primes above p; p is odd and splits completely in K.
Defines the Hida family and the ordinary projector; used throughout Sections 3 and 4.
domain assumption 0 and 1 are not Hodge-Tate weights of M.
Needed so the relevant Eisenstein series has classical weight at the point of study (Remark 1.4).
domain assumption Base change of π to GL(n)/K is cuspidal; results of [17] on Arthur classification, multiplicity one, and local-global compatibility are valid.
Used in Section 6.1 for multiplicity one and to show Archimedean components are discrete series; explicitly stated to depend on ongoing work in Remark 1.5.
standard math Iwasawa main conjecture for Hecke characters (Wiles [35]).
Used in Section 7 to bound the characteristic ideal of the CM character Selmer group by the p-adic L-function.
standard math Casselman-Shahidi irreducibility theorem for standard modules, Kudla-Sweet functional equation for degenerate principal series, and Shimura pullback formulas.
Basic tools used in Sections 4 and 6.5; quoted from [4], [19], and [26].

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Iwasawa theory for $\mathrm{U}(r,s)$, Bloch-Kato conjecture and Functional Equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6CHLRKWV

@misc{pith2026190807205,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Iwasawa theory for $\mathrmU(r,s)$, Bloch-Kato conjecture and Functional Equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6CHLRKWV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07205}
}

abstract

In this paper we develop a new method to study Iwasawa theory and Eisenstein families for unitary groups $\mathrm{U}(r,s)$ of general signature over a totally real field $F$. As a consequence we prove that for a motive corresponding to a regular algebraic cuspidal automorphic representation $\pi$ on $\mathrm{U}(r,s)_{/F}$ which is ordinary at $p$, twisted by a Hecke character, if its Selmer group has rank $0$, then the corresponding central $L$-value is nonzero. This generalizes a result of Skinner-Urban in their ICM 2006 report in the special case when $F=\mathbb{Q}$ and the motive is conjugate self-dual. Along the way we also obtain $p$-adic functional equations for the corresponding $p$-adic $L$-functions and $p$-adic families of Klingen Eisenstein series. Our method does not involve computing Fourier-Jacobi coefficients (as opposed to previous work which only work in low rank cases, e.g. $\mathrm{U}(1,1)$, $\mathrm{U}(2,0)$ and $\mathrm{U}(1,0)$) whose automorphic interpretation is unclear in general.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

[5]

E.Eischen, M.Harris, J.Li, C.Skinner, p-adic L-functions for Unitary Shimura Varieties (II), (III), preprint, arXiv 1602.01776

work page Pith review arXiv
[32]

Wan, Families of nearly ordinary Eisenstein series o n unitary groups (with an Appendix by Kai-Wen Lan), Algebra and Number Theory (2015): 1955-2054

X. Wan, Families of nearly ordinary Eisenstein series o n unitary groups (with an Appendix by Kai-Wen Lan), Algebra and Number Theory (2015): 1955-2054

work page 2015
[17]

Kaletha, A

T. Kaletha, A. Minguez, S-W Shin, and P-J White, Endosco pic Classiﬁcation of Representa- tions: Inner Forms of Unitary Groups, arXiv 1409.3731

arXiv
[1]

Fabrizio Andreatta, Adrian Iovita, Triple product p-adic L-functions associated to ﬁnite slope p-adic families of modular forms, with an appendix by Eric Ur ban, preprint, arXiv:1708.02785

work page Pith review arXiv
[2]

Bellaiche and G

J. Bellaiche and G. Chenevier, p-adic families of Galois representations and higher rank Se lmer groups, Astérisque (2009), no. 324

work page 2009
[3]

In The Grothendieck Festschrift, Vol

Bloch, S., and Kato, K., L-functions and Tamagawa numbers of motives. In The Grothendieck Festschrift, Vol. I, Progr. Math. 86, Birkhauser, Boston, MA, 1990,333-400

work page 1990
[4]

Casselman and F

W. Casselman and F. Shahidi, On irreducibility of standa rd modules of generic representations, Ann. scient. ENS, 4 série, t. 31, 1998, 561-589

work page 1998
[6]

Eischen, p-adic diﬀerential operators on automorphic forms on unitar y groups

E. Eischen, p-adic diﬀerential operators on automorphic forms on unitar y groups. Ann. Inst. Fourier, Volume 62, No. 1 (2012), 177-243. 61

work page 2012

Show all 36 references

[7]

Eischen, A p-adic Eisenstein Measure for Unitary Groups

E. Eischen, A p-adic Eisenstein Measure for Unitary Groups. J. Reine Angew . Math. 699 (2015), 111-142

2015
[8]

Eischen and X

E. Eischen and X. Wan, p-adic L-Functions of Finite Slope Forms on Unitary Groups and Eisenstein Series, Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu, volume 15, issue 03, pp. 471-510, July 2016

2016
[9]

http://www-math.mit.edu/~etingof/replect.pdf

Pavel Etingof, Oleg Golberg, Sebastian Hensel,Tiankai Liu, Alex Schwendner, Dmitry Vaintrob, and Elena Yudovina, Introduction to Representat ion Theory, MIT notes. http://www-math.mit.edu/~etingof/replect.pdf
[10]

Fulton, Joe Harris, Representation Theory – a First C ourse, GTM 225, Springer 1991

W. Fulton, Joe Harris, Representation Theory – a First C ourse, GTM 225, Springer 1991

1991
[11]

Greenberg, Iwasawa theory and p-adic Deformations of Motives, Proc

R. Greenberg, Iwasawa theory and p-adic Deformations of Motives, Proc. on Motives held at Seattle, 1994

1994
[12]

Hida, Control theorems of coherent sheaves on Shimur a varieties of PEL type, Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu, 2003, 1(1):1-76

H. Hida, Control theorems of coherent sheaves on Shimur a varieties of PEL type, Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu, 2003, 1(1):1-76

2003
[13]

Hida, H.: On p-adic L-functions of GL(2)× GL(2) over totally real ﬁelds. Ann. Inst. Fourier 40, 311-391 (1991)

1991
[14]

Eisenstein congruence on unitary groups a nd Iwasawa main conjectures for CM ﬁelds

M-L. Hsieh, “Eisenstein congruence on unitary groups a nd Iwasawa main conjectures for CM ﬁelds.” Journal of the American Mathematical Society 27.3 ( 2014): 753-862

2014
[15]

Hsieh, Ordinary p-adic Eisenstein series and p-adicL-functions for unitary groups, Ann

M.-L. Hsieh, Ordinary p-adic Eisenstein series and p-adicL-functions for unitary groups, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 61 (2011), no. 3: 987-1059

2011
[16]

Katz, p-adic L-functions for CM ﬁelds, Invent

N. Katz, p-adic L-functions for CM ﬁelds, Invent. Math. 49 (1978), no. 3, 199- 297

1978
[18]

144 (2008) 1107- 1154

Tamotsu Ikeda, On the lifting of hermitian modular form s, Compositio Math. 144 (2008) 1107- 1154

2008
[19]

Kudla and W

S. Kudla and W. J. Sweet Jr., Degenerate principal serie s representations for U(n,n ), Israel J. Math. 98 (1997), 253-306

1997
[20]

Lan, Arithmetic compactiﬁcations of PEL-type Sh imura varieties, London Mathematical Society Monographs, vol

K.-W. Lan, Arithmetic compactiﬁcations of PEL-type Sh imura varieties, London Mathematical Society Monographs, vol. 36, Princeton University Press, P rinceton, 2013

2013
[21]

Liu, p-adicL-functions for Ordinary Families on Symplectic Groups, pre print, 2016

Z. Liu, p-adicL-functions for Ordinary Families on Symplectic Groups, pre print, 2016

2016
[22]

Liu and G

Z. Liu and G. Rosso, Non-Cuspidal Hida Theory for Siegel Forms and Trivial Zeros of p-adic L-Functions, preprint, arXiv:1803.10273

arXiv
[23]

Liu, The doubling Archimedean zeta integrals for p-a dic interpolation, arXiv:1904.07121

Z. Liu, The doubling Archimedean zeta integrals for p-a dic interpolation, arXiv:1904.07121

1904 arXiv
[24]

Mok, Endoscopic classiﬁcation of representation s of quasi-split unitary groups, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, Volume 235, Number 11 08, 2015

C-P. Mok, Endoscopic classiﬁcation of representation s of quasi-split unitary groups, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, Volume 235, Number 11 08, 2015. 62

2015
[25]

Pilloni, S

V. Pilloni, S. Bijakowski and B. Stroh, Classicité de form es modulaires surconvergentes, Ann. of Math. (2) 183 (2016), no. 3, 975-1014

2016
[26]

Shimura, Euler products and Eisenstein series, CBMS R egional Conference Series in Math- ematics 93, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI , 1997

G. Shimura, Euler products and Eisenstein series, CBMS R egional Conference Series in Math- ematics 93, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI , 1997

1997
[27]

Shimura, Arithmeticity in the theory of automorphic forms, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 82

G. Shimura, Arithmeticity in the theory of automorphic forms, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 82. American Mathematical Society, Providenc e, RI, 2000. x+302 pp

2000
[28]

S.-W. Shin, On the cohomological base change for unitar y similitude groups, an appendix to Galois representations associated to holomorphic limits o f discrete series I: Unitary Groups, Compositio Math. 150 (2014), no.2, 191-228, by Wushi Goldri ng

2014
[29]

The Iwasawa mai n conjectures for GL2

Skinner, Christopher, and Eric Urban. “The Iwasawa mai n conjectures for GL2.” Inventiones mathematicae 195.1 (2014): 1-277

2014
[30]

C.Skinner and E.Urban, Vanishing of L-functions and Ra nks of Selmer Groups, ICM 2006

2006
[31]

Urban, Eigenvarieties for reductive groups, Ann

E. Urban, Eigenvarieties for reductive groups, Ann. of Math. (2) 174 (2011) no. 3, 1685-1784

2011
[33]

Wan, Iwasawa Main Conjecture for Rankin-Selberg p-adic L-functions, preprint, arXiv: 1408.4044, 2014

X. Wan, Iwasawa Main Conjecture for Rankin-Selberg p-adic L-functions, preprint, arXiv: 1408.4044, 2014

2014 arXiv
[34]

X.Wan, Iwasawa Main Conjecture for Hilbert Modular For ms, Forum of Mathematics, Sigma, 95 pages, 2015

2015
[35]

Wiles, The Iwasawa conjecture for totally real ﬁelds , Ann

A. Wiles, The Iwasawa conjecture for totally real ﬁelds , Ann. of Math. 131, 493-540, 1990

1990
[36]

Zhang, The holomorphy and non-vanishing of local int ertwining operators, Paciﬁc Journal of Mathematics, Vol

Y. Zhang, The holomorphy and non-vanishing of local int ertwining operators, Paciﬁc Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 180, No.2, 1997. 63

1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [5]

E.Eischen, M.Harris, J.Li, C.Skinner, p-adic L-functions for Unitary Shimura Varieties (II), (III), preprint, arXiv 1602.01776

work page Pith review arXiv

[2] [32]

Wan, Families of nearly ordinary Eisenstein series o n unitary groups (with an Appendix by Kai-Wen Lan), Algebra and Number Theory (2015): 1955-2054

X. Wan, Families of nearly ordinary Eisenstein series o n unitary groups (with an Appendix by Kai-Wen Lan), Algebra and Number Theory (2015): 1955-2054

work page 2015

[3] [17]

Kaletha, A

T. Kaletha, A. Minguez, S-W Shin, and P-J White, Endosco pic Classiﬁcation of Representa- tions: Inner Forms of Unitary Groups, arXiv 1409.3731

arXiv

[4] [1]

Fabrizio Andreatta, Adrian Iovita, Triple product p-adic L-functions associated to ﬁnite slope p-adic families of modular forms, with an appendix by Eric Ur ban, preprint, arXiv:1708.02785

work page Pith review arXiv

[5] [2]

Bellaiche and G

J. Bellaiche and G. Chenevier, p-adic families of Galois representations and higher rank Se lmer groups, Astérisque (2009), no. 324

work page 2009

[6] [3]

In The Grothendieck Festschrift, Vol

Bloch, S., and Kato, K., L-functions and Tamagawa numbers of motives. In The Grothendieck Festschrift, Vol. I, Progr. Math. 86, Birkhauser, Boston, MA, 1990,333-400

work page 1990

[7] [4]

Casselman and F

W. Casselman and F. Shahidi, On irreducibility of standa rd modules of generic representations, Ann. scient. ENS, 4 série, t. 31, 1998, 561-589

work page 1998

[8] [6]

Eischen, p-adic diﬀerential operators on automorphic forms on unitar y groups

E. Eischen, p-adic diﬀerential operators on automorphic forms on unitar y groups. Ann. Inst. Fourier, Volume 62, No. 1 (2012), 177-243. 61

work page 2012