REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 36 references
Flexibility of Ga-containing Type-II superlattice for long-wavelength infrared detection
T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash
Pith's one-line read For diffusion-limited long-wavelength infrared detection, a 12/4 InAs/GaSb superlattice lowers dark current to 0.78 times the standard 14/7 design after correcting for the band-gap difference.
desk verdict New period-composition data are a real contribution, but the headline dark-current advantage is within run-to-run scatter and the model explanation is partly circular. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The load-bearing object is the ratio $R$ of InAs thickness to GaSb thickness in one superlattice period, which shapes the electronic band structure independently of the band gap. The paper computes effective masses and overlaps with an 8-band k.p envelope-function method that includes an interface matrix with four fitted parameters ($D_S=0.8$, $D_X=0.3$, $D_Z=-0.3$ eV·Å and $\alpha=\beta=0.2$ eV·Å); the interface terms are essential to reproduce the measured cutoffs. The 14/7 versus 12/4 device comparison then carries the electrical argument: the 12/4 period has smaller electron and hole effective masses, so its density-of-states product $N_c N_v$ is 0.63 times that of the 14/7 period, and the longer fitted lifetime adds another factor. The same band-structure calculation gives the wavefunction overlap that connects the design to optical properties.
What would settle it
Measure the electron effective mass in the 12/4 and 14/7 superlattices directly, for example with Shubnikov–de Haas oscillations, and compare the ratio of $N_cN_v$ products; if it is not near 0.63, the density-of-states mechanism fails. Separately, measure the corrected dark-current ratio at several temperatures in the 120-180 K range; if it drifts from 0.78, the 150 K comparison includes non-diffusive contributions.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The central claim is that replacing a 14 ML InAs / 7 ML GaSb period with a 12 ML InAs / 4 ML GaSb period reduces the diffusion-limited dark current in long-wavelength infrared detectors while keeping a similar cutoff. The paper supports this by growing both structures, measuring their 77 K photoluminescence band gaps, and fitting the dark-current density at 150 K with a device simulation whose only free parameter is the minority-carrier lifetime. The measured dark-current ratio is 0.42, and after normalizing by $\exp(-E_g/k_B T)$ to remove the band-gap difference it is 0.78. The proposed mechanism is that the thinner GaSb layer weakens carrier localization, giving smaller electron and hole effective masses; this lowers the $N_c N_v$ product (by a factor of 0.63 from the k.p calculation) that appears in the diffusion-current prefactor, and the fitted lifetime is also longer (9.4 ns versus 7.5 ns). As a secondary consequence, the 12/4 period raises the electron-hole wavefunction overlap from 40% to 58%, which the paper expects to improve absorption.
Load-bearing premise
The whole explanation leans on an 8-band k.p band-structure calculation whose interface parameters were fitted to the same photoluminescence band gaps used to validate it; if those parameters do not transfer to other period compositions, the effective-mass part of the 0.78 ratio collapses and only the fitted lifetime (7.5 versus 9.4 ns) is left.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Diffusion-limited detectors can be made quieter by choosing a thinner GaSb layer in the absorber, without adding barrier layers.
- The 12/4 design's higher wavefunction overlap (58% versus 40%) points to stronger absorption and higher quantum efficiency in the same material system.
- The advantage is temperature-dependent: at low temperature the 12/4 SL appears limited by surface or tunnelling currents, so realizing the benefit at lower operating temperatures will require barrier structures.
- Because effective mass depends more on period composition than on band gap, the same cutoff wavelength can be reached by designs with markedly different transport properties.
Reading between the lines
- A direct test of the mechanism would measure the effective masses of the 12/4 and 14/7 periods by magnetotransport or cyclotron resonance; if the measured $N_cN_v$ ratio is not close to 0.63, the density-of-states explanation would need revision.
- The dark-current comparison rests on a single temperature point (150 K) after correction; measuring the corrected ratio across the whole diffusion-dominated range (roughly 120-180 K) would show whether 0.78 is stable or contaminated by non-diffusive contributions.
- The paper's own suggestion of a 12/2 period as a future absorber is a natural monotonic extension: it should further shrink effective masses and raise overlap, but the growth challenge is interface control, which the XRD data show is already the limiting factor.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper investigates the design flexibility of Ga-containing InAs/GaSb type-II superlattices for long-wavelength infrared detection. It reports MBE growth of several X/4 and 14/Y SL structures, characterization by XRD and photoluminescence, 8-band k.p band-structure calculations of the grown periods, and a comparative study of two p-i-n photodiodes whose absorbers are a 14/7 SL and a 12/4 SL. The central claim is that at 150 K, after correcting for the different band gaps, the 12/4 SL shows a lower diffusion current than the 14/7 SL by a factor of 0.78, attributed to smaller effective masses (reduced NcNv product) and a longer minority-carrier lifetime.
Significance. If the central claim were robust, the paper would provide a useful demonstration that SL period composition can be used to improve the performance of diffusion-limited LWIR detectors, and the effective-mass trends would be a valuable design guideline. The work has clear strengths: a systematic growth study showing nearly strain-compensated SLs over a range of periods, XRD and PL data that are internally consistent, and k.p modeling that explicitly includes interface effects. However, the quantitative 0.78 improvement is not statistically robust, and the mechanistic explanation relies on parameters fitted to the same data. The paper is more convincing as a demonstration of growth flexibility and of qualitative effective-mass trends than as a quantitative device-performance improvement.
major comments (4)
- [Section IV, Table 3 and Figure 6] The corrected dark-current ratio 0.78 is exponentially sensitive to the band-gap difference ΔEg = Eg(12/4) − Eg(14/7). At 150 K the correction is (1.07/2.52) × exp(ΔEg/kBT) = 0.425 × exp(ΔEg/12.93 meV). Using the device-wafer gaps reported at 77 K (0.122 eV for 12/4 and 0.110 eV for 14/7) gives ΔEg ≈ 12 meV and a corrected ratio of about 1.08; using the 13 meV run-to-run shift documented in the paper for the 14/7 SL between Section II (0.123 eV) and Section IV (0.110 eV) gives 1.16; using ΔEg = 8 meV gives 0.78. With no error bars, no repeated growths, and no die-to-die statistics, the claimed 22% improvement is within the sample-to-sample scatter that the manuscript itself reports. This undermines the central conclusion in Section V that the 12/4 SL has a lower diffusion current after correction.
- [Section III-1, Eq. (1) and Figure 3] The interface parameters D_S, D_X, D_Z in Eq. (1) are explicitly fitted to reproduce the measured band gaps of the same four samples ('determined in order to obtain a good agreement between the calculated and measured energy band gap'), so the agreement shown in Figure 3 is a calibration rather than an independent prediction. The statement in the conclusion that the model 'can predict the measured band gap within an error of ±kBT' overstates the evidence. Consequently, the effective masses in Table 2 and the NcNv factor of 0.63 used in Section IV to explain the dark-current ratio are model outputs that have not been independently validated against, for example, transport or magneto-optical measurements.
- [Section IV, Figure 8] The minority-carrier lifetimes τ = 7.5 ns and 9.4 ns are extracted as the only fitting parameters in the TCAD simulation to match the measured dark-current curves of the two devices. Using these fitted lifetimes to explain why the 12/4 SL has a lower diffusion current is circular: the lifetimes are derived from the same I-V data they are invoked to explain. The factor-1.25 lifetime ratio is not independent evidence, and without time-resolved PL or another direct lifetime measurement the decomposition of the dark-current ratio into lifetime and NcNv contributions is not supported.
- [Section IV, Figure 7] The assertion that both devices are diffusion-limited at 150 K is not quantitatively justified. The text states that at high temperature the dark current varies as the diffusion current, but the 12/4 SL exhibits a slower temperature variation at low temperature that the authors attribute to surface leakage or tunneling. If non-diffusion components contribute at 150 K, the band-gap correction in Table 3 does not isolate the diffusion current. A quantitative test of the diffusion-limited assumption (e.g., fitting the temperature dependence over a range around 150 K and reporting residuals) is needed before the corrected ratio can be interpreted.
minor comments (4)
- [Section V] In the conclusion, 'corelated' should be 'correlated'.
- [Section IV, Table 3] The corrected dark-current densities (12.5 × 10^3 and 9.8 × 10^3 A/cm^2) are exp(Eg/kBT)-weighted values, not physical current densities; this should be stated explicitly in the table caption to avoid confusion.
- [Section II-2 and Section III-2] The experimental band gap is defined from the PL maximum minus kBT/2 (Section II-2), while the calculated gap is a zone-center energy from the k.p model. The paper would benefit from an explicit statement of how these two definitions are reconciled when comparing calculated and measured cut-off wavelengths in Figure 3.
- [Section IV, Figure 6] The Varshni fit parameters are reported for each sample, but the resulting Eg values at 150 K are not stated; reporting them would make the band-gap correction in Table 3 fully transparent and reproducible.
Circularity Check
Calibrated k.p gaps and fitted TCAD lifetimes are presented as predictive evidence; raw device comparison is not circular but the explanatory chain is partly circular.
-
fitted input called prediction
[Section III-1, Eq. (1); Section III-2, Figure 3; Section V]
"the D diagonal interface parameters (DS, DX, DZ), which are equal to zero in the case of a common atom superlattice, are determined in order to obtain a good agreement between the calculated and measured energy band gap of the X/4 and 14/Y SLs at 77K (Figure 2). [...] by using an 8-band k⸳p envelope function method that can predict the measured band gap within an error of ±kBT"
The three D parameters in Eq. (1) are free inputs, and the paper states they were adjusted until the calculated gaps matched the very PL gaps of the grown X/4 and 14/Y samples. Consequently the Figure 3 agreement (all samples within ±kT) is a calibration residual, not an out-of-sample prediction. The later claim that the method 'can predict the measured band gap' inverts the direction of the fit. The effective masses in Table 2, and hence the NcNv product invoked to explain the 0.78 ratio, are outputs of this same calibrated band structure; they inherit the fit rather than providing independent validation.
-
fitted input called prediction
[Section IV, Figure 8 and Table 3 discussion]
"The only fitting parameter of the simulation is the minority carrier lifetime τ. In Figure 8, a good agreement between the simulated and experimental dark-current can be observed at 150K ... The minority lifetime extracted from the simulation is equal to 7.5 and 9.4 ns for the 14/7 SL and 12/4 SL. A relatively longer minority carrier lifetime (~ x 1.25) contributes in part to the lower diffusion current measured for the 12/4 SL device."
τ is explicitly the only free parameter of the TCAD simulation, and it is adjusted until the simulated dark-current matches the measured 150K curves. Extracting 7.5 and 9.4 ns from those same curves and then stating that the longer lifetime 'contributes in part' to the lower measured current is a restatement of the fit rather than an independent measurement of the lifetime. Thus the proposed mechanism is not independently evidenced by this step; the direct evidence is only the raw dark-current difference.
full rationale
The raw empirical content of the paper—PL gaps, XRD, and the measured dark-current densities (2.52 vs 1.07 A/cm2 at 150 K) and the resulting Eg-corrected ratio 0.78—is not circular; the corrected ratio uses measured Eg values from Figure 6 and is not equal to an input by construction. However, the explanatory chain is partially circular. The k.p interface parameters (DS, DX, DZ) are fitted to the same PL gaps that are then reported as 'predicted' within ±kT, and the effective masses used to argue for a reduced NcNv product come from that calibrated model. Separately, the TCAD minority-carrier lifetime is the sole fitting parameter used to reproduce the 150 K dark-current curves, yet the extracted lifetime is then invoked as the physical cause of the measured current difference. These are fitted inputs called predictions. The self-citations (Refs. 20, 21, 27, 33, 36) support methodology or a design proposal and are not load-bearing for the central comparison. Finally, the robustness of the headline 0.78 ratio is a correctness risk rather than a circularity issue: the paper itself reports a 13 meV run-to-run change in the 14/7 gap between Section II and Section IV, and ±5 meV uncertainty in Eg can change the corrected ratio by roughly ±50%.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (5)
- D_S, D_X, D_Z interface parameters =
(0.8, 0.3, -0.3) eV.A
- InSb interface layer thickness per period =
10 percent of InAs thickness
- Minority carrier lifetime tau =
7.5 ns (14/7 SL), 9.4 ns (12/4 SL)
- Varshni parameters alpha and E_g(0K) =
alpha = 0.019 and 0.094 meV/K; E_g(0K) = 0.111 and 0.124 eV
- Serial resistance in TCAD =
about 1.5 ohm.cm2
assumptions (4)
- standard math 8-band k.p envelope-function method with the Klipstein interface matrix models the superlattice electronic structure.
- domain assumption Strain-compensated, lattice-matched superlattice on GaSb is assumed in simulation, with total InSb interface thickness equal to 10 percent of the InAs thickness per period.
- domain assumption PL emission peak minus kT/2 defines the energy gap and 50 percent cutoff wavelength.
- domain assumption Dark current decomposes into diffusion (proportional to ni^2) and generation-recombination (proportional to ni), with ni proportional to exp(-E_g/2kT).
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Flexibility of Ga-containing Type-II superlattice for long-wavelength infrared detection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DDAPLIPZ
@misc{pith2026190807298,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Flexibility of Ga-containing Type-II superlattice for long-wavelength infrared detection},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DDAPLIPZ}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07298}
}
read the original abstract
In this paper, the flexibility of long-wavelength Type-II InAs/GaSb superlattice (Ga-containing SL) is explored and investigated from the growth to the device performance. First, several samples with different SL period composition and thickness are grown by molecular beam epitaxy. Nearly strain-compensated SLs on GaSb exhibiting an energy band gap between 105 to 169 meV at 77K are obtained. Second, from electronic band structure calculation, material parameters are extracted and compared for the different grown SLs. Finally, two p-i-n device structures with different SL periods are grown and their electrical performance compared. Our investigation shows that an alternative SL design could potentially be used to improve the device performance of diffusion-limited devices for long-wavelength infrared detection.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
B.V. Olson, E.A. Shaner, J.K. Kim, J.F. Klem, S.D. Hawkins, L.M. Murray, J.P. Prineas, M.E. Flatté, T.F. Boggess, “Time-resolved optical measurements of minority carrier recombination in a mid- wave infrared InAsSb alloy and InAs/InAsSb superlattice”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 092109 (2012)
work page 2012
-
[2]
E.H. Steenbergen, B.C. Connelly, G.D. Metcalfe, H. Shen, M. Wraback, D. Lubyshev, Y. Qiu, J.M. Fastenau, A.W.K. Liu, S. Elhamri, O.O. Cellek, Y.-H. Zhang, “Significantly improved minority carrier 20 lifetime observed in a long-wavelength infrared III-V type-II superlattice comprised of InAs/InAsSb”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 251110 (2011)
work page 2011
-
[3]
A. Haddadi, A. Dehzangi, S. Adhikary, R. Chevallier, M. Razeghi, “Background –limited long wavelength infrared InAs/InAs 1− xSbx type-II superlattice-based photodetectors operating at 110 K”, APL Materials, 5(3), 035502 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[4]
Mid-wavelength high operating temperature barrier infrared detector and focal plane array
D. Z. Ting, A. Soibel, A. Khoshakhlagh, S. B. Rafol, S. A. Keo, L. Höglund, A. M. Fisher, E. M. Luong, S. D. Gunapala, “Mid-wavelength high operating temperature barrier infrared detector and focal plane array”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 021101 (2018)
work page 2018
-
[5]
Modeling InAs/GaSb and InAs/InAsSb Superlattice Infrared Detectors
P.C. Klipstein, Y. Livneh, A. Glozman, S. Grossman, O. Klin, N. Snapi, E. Weiss, “Modeling InAs/GaSb and InAs/InAsSb Superlattice Infrared Detectors”. J. Electron. Mater 43, 2984 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[6]
Type -II superlattice hole effective masses
D. Z. Ting, A. Soibel, S. D. Gunapala, “Type -II superlattice hole effective masses”, Inf. Phys. Technol. 84, 102–106 (2017)
work page 2017
-
[7]
European Space Agency detector development for space science: present and future activities,
L. Duvet, M. Bavdaz, P.E. Crouzet, N. Nelms, Y. R. Nowicki -Bringuier, B. Shortt, P. Verhoeve, "European Space Agency detector development for space science: present and future activities," Proc. SPIE 9154, 915403 (2014)
work page 2014
-
[8]
Very long wavelength type -II InAs/GaSb superlattice infrared detectors,
L. Höglund, J. B. Rodriguez, S. Naureen, R. Ivanov, C. Asplund, R. Marcks von Würtemberg, R. Rossignol, P. Christol, A. Rouvié, J. Brocal, O. Saint -Pé, E. Cos tard, "Very long wavelength type -II InAs/GaSb superlattice infrared detectors," Proc. SPIE 10624, 106240I (2018)
work page 2018
Show all 36 references
-
[9]
Höglund, J
L. Höglund, J. B. Rodriguez, R. Marcks von Würtemberg, S. Naureen, R. Ivanov, C. Asplund, R. Alchaar, P. Christol, A. Rouvié, J. Brocal, O. Sa int-Pé, E. Costard, “Influence of shallow versus deep etching on dark current and quantum efficiency in InAs/GaSb superlattice photode...
2018
-
[10]
Minority carrier lifetime and diffusion length in type II superlattice barrier devices
P. C. Klipstein, Y. Benny, S. Gliksman, A. Glozman, E. Hojman, O. Klin, L. Langof, I. Lukomsky, I. Marderfeld, M. Nitzani, N. Snapi, E. Weiss, “Minority carrier lifetime and diffusion length in type II superlattice barrier devices”, Inf. Phys. Technol. 96, 155–162 (2019)
2019
-
[11]
Performance and radiation tolerance of InAs/GaSb LWIR detectors based on CBIRD design
A. Soibel, D. Z. Ting, S. B. Rafol, A. Khoshakhlagh, A. Fisher, S. A. Keo, S. D. Gunapala, “Performance and radiation tolerance of InAs/GaSb LWIR detectors based on CBIRD design”, Proc. SPIE 9974, 99740L (2016)
2016
-
[12]
Toward realization of small -size dual -band long - wavelength infrared photodetectors based on InAs/GaSb/AlSb type -II superlattices
R. Chevallier, A. Haddadi, M. Razeghi, “Toward realization of small -size dual -band long - wavelength infrared photodetectors based on InAs/GaSb/AlSb type -II superlattices”, Solid -State Electron. 136, 51-54 (2017)
2017
-
[13]
Long -wave InAs/GaSb superlattice detectors based on nBn and pin designs
A. Khoshakhlagh, S. Myers, H. Kim, E. Plis, N. Gautam, S. J. Lee, S. K. Noh, L. R. Daws on, S. Krishna, “Long -wave InAs/GaSb superlattice detectors based on nBn and pin designs”, IEEE J . Quantum Electron. 46, 959–964 (2010)
2010
-
[14]
InAs/GaSb Type II superlattice barrier devices with a low dark current and high quantum efficiency
P.C. Klipstein, E. Avnon, Y. Benny, R. Fraenkel, A. Glozman, S. Grossman, O. Klin, L. Langoff, Y. Livneh, I. Lukomsky, M. Nitzani, L. Shkedy, I. Shtrichman, N. Snapi, A. Tuito, E. Weiss, “InAs/GaSb Type II superlattice barrier devices with a low dark current and high quantum e...
2014
-
[15]
LWIR Strained -Layer Superlattice Materials and Devices at Teledyne Imaging Sensors
A. D. Hood, A. J. Evans, A. Lkhlassi, D. L. Lee and W. E. Tennant, “LWIR Strained -Layer Superlattice Materials and Devices at Teledyne Imaging Sensors”, J. Electron. Mater. 39, 1001–1006 (2010)
2010
-
[16]
Very high performance LWIR and VLWIR Type-II InAs/GaSb superlattice photodiodes with M-structure barrier
B. -M. Nguyen, D. Hoffmann, P. -Y. Delaunay, E. K. Huang, M. Razeghi, “Very high performance LWIR and VLWIR Type-II InAs/GaSb superlattice photodiodes with M-structure barrier”, Proc. SPIE 7082, 708205 (2008). 21
2008
-
[17]
Performance improvement of longwave infrared photodetector based on type -II InAs/GaSb superlattices using unipolar current blocking layers
M. Gautam, H. S. Kim, M. N. Kutty, E. Plis, L. R. Dawson, S. Krishna, “Performance improvement of longwave infrared photodetector based on type -II InAs/GaSb superlattices using unipolar current blocking layers”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 231107 (2010)
2010
-
[18]
A high- performance long wavelength superlattice complementary barrier infrared detector
D. Z. Y. Ting, C. J. Hill, A. Soibel, S. A. Keo, J.M. Mumolo, J. Nguyen, S. D. Gunapala, “A high- performance long wavelength superlattice complementary barrier infrared detector”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 023508 (2009)
2009
-
[19]
nBn detector, an infrared detector with reduced dark current and higher operating temperature
S. Maimon and G. W. Wicks, “nBn detector, an infrared detector with reduced dark current and higher operating temperature”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 151109 (2006)
2006
-
[20]
Influence of the period thickness and composition on the electro -optical properties of type -II InAs/GaSb midwave infrared superlattice photodetectors
R. Taalat, J. -B. Rodriguez, M. Delmas, P. Christol, “Influence of the period thickness and composition on the electro -optical properties of type -II InAs/GaSb midwave infrared superlattice photodetectors”, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 47, 015101 (2014)
2014
-
[21]
Quantum efficiency investigations of type -II InAs/GaSb midwave infrared superlattice photodetectors
E. Giard, I. Ribet-Mohamed, J. Jaeck, T. Viale, R. Haïdar, R. Taalat, M. Delmas, J. -B. Rodriguez, E. Steveler, N. Bardou, F. Boulard, P.Christol, “Quantum efficiency investigations of type -II InAs/GaSb midwave infrared superlattice photodetectors”, J. Appl. Phys. 116, 1–7 (2014)
2014
-
[22]
Control of interface stoichiometry in InAs / GaSb superlattices grown by molecular beam epitaxy
B. R. Bennett, B. V. Shanabrook, R. J. Wagner, J. L. Davis, J. R. Waterman, “Control of interface stoichiometry in InAs / GaSb superlattices grown by molecular beam epitaxy”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 949 (1993)
1993
-
[23]
Effect of interfacial formation on the properties of very long wavelength infrared InAs/GaSb superlattices
H. J. Haugan, G. J. Brown, L . Grazulis, “Effect of interfacial formation on the properties of very long wavelength infrared InAs/GaSb superlattices”, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 29, 03C101 (2011)
2011
-
[24]
Gas source molecular beam epitaxy / migration enhanced epitaxy growth of InAs/AlSb superlattices
M. Seta, H. Asahi, S. G. Kim, K. Asami, S. Gonda, “Gas source molecular beam epitaxy / migration enhanced epitaxy growth of InAs/AlSb superlattices”, J. Appl. Phys. 74, 5033 (1993)
1993
-
[25]
Optical analysis of InAs heterostructures grown by migration-enhanced epitaxy
M. Inoue, M. Yano, H. Furuse, N. Nasu and Y. Iwai, “Optical analysis of InAs heterostructures grown by migration-enhanced epitaxy”, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 8, S121-124 (1993)
1993
-
[26]
Interface design and properties in InAs/GaSb type-II superlattices grown by molecular beam epitaxy
Z. Xu, J. Chen, Y. Zhou, Q. Xu, C. Jin and H. Li, “Interface design and properties in InAs/GaSb type-II superlattices grown by molecular beam epitaxy”, Proc. SPIE 8907, 89073J (2013)
2013
-
[27]
Material and device characterization of Type-II InAs/GaSb superlattice infrared detectors
M. Delmas, M. C. Debnath, B. L. Liang, D. L. Huffaker, “Material and device characterization of Type-II InAs/GaSb superlattice infrared detectors”, Inf. Phys. Technol. 97, 286-290 (2018)
2018
-
[28]
Optimization of InAs/GaSb type-II superlattice interfaces for long-wave (~8 µm) infrared detection
A. Khoshakhlagh, E. Plis, S. Myers, Y. D. Sharma, L. R. Dawson, S. Krishna, “Optimization of InAs/GaSb type-II superlattice interfaces for long-wave (~8 µm) infrared detection”, J. Cryst. Growth, 311, 1901–1904 (2009)
2009
-
[29]
https://www.nextnano.de/nextnano3/
-
[30]
Modeling of semiconductor nanostructures and semiconductor-electrolyte interfaces
S. Birner, “Modeling of semiconductor nanostructures and semiconductor-electrolyte interfaces”, Selected Topics of Semiconductor Physics and Technology, Vol. 135, Verein zur Förderung des Walter Schottky Instituts de Technischen Universität München e.V., München, 239 pp. (2011...
2011
-
[31]
Operator ordering and interface -band mixing in th e Kane-like Hamiltonian of lattice-matched semiconductor superlattices with abrupt interfaces
P. C. Klipstein, “Operator ordering and interface -band mixing in th e Kane-like Hamiltonian of lattice-matched semiconductor superlattices with abrupt interfaces”, Phys. Rev. B 8, 235314 (2010)
2010
-
[32]
k·p model for the energy dispersions and absor ption spectra of InAs/GaSb type -II superlattices
Y. Livneh, P. C. Klipstein, O. Klin, N. Snapi, S. Grossman, A. Glozman, E. Weiss, “k·p model for the energy dispersions and absor ption spectra of InAs/GaSb type -II superlattices”, Phys. Rev. B 86, 235311 (2012)
2012
-
[33]
A comprehensive set of simulation tools to model and design high -performance Type -II InAs/GaSb superlattice infrared detectors,
M. Delmas, B. L. Liang, D. L. Huffaker, "A comprehensive set of simulation tools to model and design high -performance Type -II InAs/GaSb superlattice infrared detectors," Pro c. SPIE 10926, 109260G (2019); 22
2019
-
[34]
HgCdTe infrared detector material: history, status and outlook
A. Rogalski, “HgCdTe infrared detector material: history, status and outlook”, Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 2267-2336 (2005)
2005
-
[35]
Varshni parameters for InAs/GaSb strained layer superlattice infrared photodetectors
B. Klein, E. Plis, M. N. Kutty, N. Gautam, A. Albrecht, S. Myers, S. Krishna, “Varshni parameters for InAs/GaSb strained layer superlattice infrared photodetectors”, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 44, 075102 (2011)
2011
-
[36]
Electrical modeling of InAs/GaSb superlattice mid - wavelength infrared pin photodiode to analyze experimental dark current characteristics
M. Delmas, J. -B. Rodriguez, P. Christol, “Electrical modeling of InAs/GaSb superlattice mid - wavelength infrared pin photodiode to analyze experimental dark current characteristics”, J. Appl. Phys. 116, 113101 (2014). 23 Table Captions Table 1: Parameters extracted from the ...
2014
Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.