Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 91 references

Classification of tensor decompositions for II$_1$ factors

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The main theorem classifies all diffuse tensor decompositions of $L(\Gamma)$ for three new classes of groups by showing they come from direct product decompositions of $\Gamma$, up to unitary conjugation and amplification.

desk verdict Substantial new results in tensor decomposition rigidity, but a load-bearing gap in the amalgam theorem's proof leaves the main classification conditional. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07440 v1 pith:6JWX4CJF submitted 2019-08-17 math.OA

Wanchalerm Sucpikarnon This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.OA MSC 46L1046L3620E0620E22
keywords II$_1$factorstensordecompositionsgroupvonNeumannalgebrasamalgamatedfreeproductswreathT0andT1functorsspatialcommensurabilityuniqueprimefactorization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This dissertation proves classification results for tensor product decompositions of group von Neumann algebras $L(\Gamma)$. It establishes that for three new families of countable discrete groups—amalgamated free products whose amalgam subgroup is finite-by-icc with virtually prime group-factor corners, direct products of generalized wreath products, and groups built from the $T_0$ and $T_1$ functors—every tensor splitting $L(\Gamma)=M_1\bar\otimes M_2$ into diffuse factors is induced, up to unitary conjugation and amplification, by a direct product splitting of the underlying group $\Gamma$. Such a dictionary is not generally available: group von Neumann algebras forget most of the group, so knowing when tensor factors must come from group factors is a substantive rigidity result.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is a notion of spatial commensurability for von Neumann subalgebras: one writes $P\sim^{\mathrm{com}}_M Q$ when a corner of $P$ embeds into a corner of $Q$ with finite index, after conjugation by a partial isometry. This relation detects whether a tensor factor of $L(\Gamma)$ is commensurable to a group subalgebra $L(\Sigma)$, and it pairs with a finite-index commuting-corner theorem: if commuting subfactors $P,Q\subset rL(\Gamma)r$ have $P\vee Q$ of finite index and $P\sim^{\mathrm{com}}_{L(\Gamma)}L(\Sigma)$, then there is a subgroup $\Omega< C_\Gamma(\Sigma)$ with $[\Gamma:\Sigma\Omega]<\infty$ and $Q\sim^{\mathrm{com}}_{L(\Gamma)}L(\Omega)$. This finite-index machinery converts algebraically detected tensor factors into actual direct product decompositions of the group, up to finite-index error; a final group-theoretic step removes the error. For the functor groups, the key argument is an asymptotic bimodule-clustering analysis showing that any tensor factor must be amenable relative to the intersection of certain subgroups, forcing it to be the hyperfinite factor.

What would settle it

A counterexample would be an icc amalgam $\Gamma=\Gamma_1*_\Sigma\Gamma_2$ satisfying the hypotheses (finite-by-icc $\Sigma$, virtually prime corners of $L(\Sigma)$) for which $L(\Gamma)$ admits a diffuse tensor decomposition not unitarily conjugate, up to amplification, to a decomposition coming from $\Gamma=\Omega\times(\Gamma_1^0*_{\Sigma_0}\Gamma_2^0)$. Constructing or ruling out such an example would settle the main theorem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is Theorem 1.1. Let $\Gamma=\Gamma_1*_\Sigma\Gamma_2$ be an icc group with $[\Gamma_1:\Sigma]\ge 2$ and $[\Gamma_2:\Sigma]\ge 3$. Assume $\Sigma$ is finite-by-icc and every corner of $L(\Sigma)$ is virtually prime. If $L(\Gamma)=M_1\bar\otimes M_2$ with $M_i$ diffuse, then there exist decompositions $\Sigma=\Omega\times\Sigma_0$ with $\Sigma_0$ finite, $\Gamma_1=\Omega\times\Gamma_1^0$, $\Gamma_2=\Omega\times\Gamma_2^0$, hence $\Gamma=\Omega\times(\Gamma_1^0*_{\Sigma_0}\Gamma_2^0)$, and there is a unitary $u$, a scalar $t>0$, and a permutation $s$ such that $M_{s(1)}=uL(\Omega)^tu^*$ and $M_{s(2)}=uL(\Gamma_1^0*_{\Sigma_0}\Gamma_2^0)^{1/t}u^*$. The same pattern is established for direct products of generalized wreath product groups and for the $T_0$ and $T_1$ functor groups: all diffuse tensor decompositions are parametrized by canonical direct product decompositions of the underlying group, with the only extra factor for the functor groups being the hyperfinite $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor.

Load-bearing premise

The chain rests on a deep prior theorem—not reproved here—stating that a certain finite-index condition between a group subalgebra and its relative commutant forces the underlying group to split as a product up to finite index; if that theorem has hidden hypotheses, the direct-product conclusion collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For amalgamated free product groups satisfying the theorem's hypotheses, $L(\Gamma)$ is either prime or has a unique prime factorization whose factors are, up to amplification, $L(\Omega)$ and $L(\Gamma_1^0*_{\Sigma_0}\Gamma_2^0)$; this supplies many new prime group factors, including factors of certain simple groups built as amalgams.
  • For direct products of generalized wreath product groups, every tensor decomposition is governed by a partition of the factor set, up to a single amplification parameter; this generalizes earlier unique-prime-decomposition results for such factors.
  • For the $T_0$ and $T_1$ functor groups, every diffuse tensor decomposition of $L(T_\alpha(\Gamma))$ has one factor isomorphic to the hyperfinite $\mathrm{II}_1$ factor; the only tensor flexibility of these factors is absorption of the hyperfinite factor.
  • The classification applies to products of several $T_0/T_1$ groups as well: tensor splittings occur only in the 'amenable rooms' around subproducts, meaning the non-amenable tensor structure is still governed by the group's direct product decomposition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the spatial-commensurability technology looks applicable to iterated amalgams and HNN extensions, since the finite-index commuting-corner argument does not visibly use the two-term form of the amalgam in an essential way.
  • A natural testable extension is to weaken the assumption that every corner of $L(\Sigma)$ is virtually prime to a solidity or relative-solidity condition; the expected outcome is the same direct-product conclusion up to finite-index error, though the paper does not claim this.
  • For iterated $T_0/T_1$ constructions, the same bimodule-clustering argument should yield a 'unique prime factorization up to the hyperfinite factor' for all finite products of such groups, and checking the base case with amenable $\Gamma$ would clarify how much of the non-amenability hypothesis is needed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies tensor product decompositions of group II$_1$ factors $L(\Gamma)$. Its central aim is to show that, for certain classes of groups, every tensor decomposition $L(\Gamma)=M_1\bar\otimes M_2$ into diffuse factors is, up to unitary conjugation and amplification, the canonical decomposition coming from a direct product splitting $\Gamma=\Gamma_1\times\Gamma_2$. The main results are Theorem 1.1 for icc amalgamated free product groups $\Gamma=\Gamma_1*_\Sigma\Gamma_2$ with finite-by-icc core and virtually prime corners of $L(\Sigma)$, Theorem 1.2 for direct products of wreath product groups in the class $WR$, and Theorem 1.3 for factors associated with McDuff's group functors $T_0,T_1$. The proofs combine Popa's intertwining techniques, finite-index inclusion machinery, spatial commensurability for von Neumann algebras, and several published rigidity results, including results from the authors' own research group.

Significance. If the results are correct, they are substantial: Theorem 1.1 supplies a broad new family of groups whose group factors have all tensor decompositions parametrized by direct product decompositions of the group, yielding many new prime factors and unique-prime-factorization examples; Theorem 1.2 generalizes the Sizemore--Winchester unique prime decomposition results for wreath product factors; Theorem 1.3 gives the first complete tensor decomposition classification for factors associated with McDuff's classical group functors. The paper also introduces the notion of spatial commensurability, which is a potentially useful technical tool in the subject. The main theorems are concrete falsifiable statements, and much of the background machinery is drawn from published work with independent proofs. The central proofs, however, contain several verification gaps that are load-bearing for Theorem 1.1, and one stated theorem is left without proof.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 6.1, proof of Theorem 6.1] The case analysis in the proof of Theorem 6.1 is not verifiable as written. The proof repeatedly refers to 'condition (6.1)' and 'case (6.1)', but no display (6.1) is labeled in the text. Moreover, in the first application of Theorem 5.4 to an amenable subalgebra $A\subset A_1$, the conclusions are listed as statements about $A_2$; Theorem 5.4, however, gives conclusions about $A$ and its normalizer $N_{pMp}(A)''$, and the proof does not justify why $A_2$ may replace that normalizer. Since Corollary 6.2 and Theorem 6.3 both rest on Theorem 6.1, this gap affects the foundational step of the amalgamated free product analysis.
  2. [Section 6.2, proof of Theorem 6.8, Eqs. (6.19)--(6.20)] The decisive hypothesis of Theorem 6.6 is not verified. Theorem 6.6 requires a nonzero projection $p\in Z(L(\Sigma)'\cap L(\Lambda))$ such that $(L(\Sigma)\vee(L(\Sigma)'\cap L(\Lambda)))p\subset pL(\Lambda)p$ has finite Pimsner--Popa basis. The proof of Theorem 6.8 only obtains a finite-index corner inclusion $ww^*(L(\Sigma)\vee(L(\Sigma)'\cap L(\Gamma)))ww^*\subset ww^*L(\Gamma)ww^*$, and the projection $ww^*$ is shown to lie in $(aL(\Sigma)a)'\cap aL(\Gamma)a$ rather than in the center of $L(\Sigma)'\cap L(\Gamma)$. The displayed equality (6.19), which would identify the corner of $aL(\Sigma)a'\cap aL(\Gamma)a$ with the corner of $L(\Sigma)'\cap L(\Gamma)$, is asserted without proof and is not justified for an arbitrary corner projection $a$. Consequently the hypothesis of Theorem 6.6 is not established, and the group splitting conclusion in Theorem 6.11, which depends on Theorem 6.8, is not secured.
  3. [Section 6.3.3, Theorem 6.15] Theorem 6.15 is stated as a theorem in the main text, but its proof is explicitly omitted: the text says the proof follows the same arguments as Theorem 6.14 and 'is left to the reader'. A stated classification theorem without a proof cannot be accepted as part of the paper's claims. Either a complete proof must be supplied, or the statement should be downgraded to a conjecture or remark.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Theorem 6.11 statement] The conclusion 'hence $\Gamma = \Sigma \times(\Gamma_1^0 *_{\Sigma_0} \Gamma_2^0)$' should read '$\Gamma = \Omega \times(\Gamma_1^0 *_{\Sigma_0} \Gamma_2^0)$'; otherwise it contradicts the preceding decompositions $\Sigma=\Omega\times\Sigma_0$.
  2. [Throughout] There are numerous typographical errors that should be corrected in a revision, for example 'Pimnser--Popa' for 'Pimsner--Popa', 'centerizer' for 'centralizer', 'MsDuff' for 'McDuff', 'agian' for 'again', 'preset' for 'present', and 'compatification' for 'compactification'.
  3. [Section 6.2, proof of Theorem 6.8] The proof uses '$\Lambda$' in the sentence 'there exists a subgroup $\Omega<\Lambda$', but the ambient group throughout the theorem is $\Gamma$, not $\Lambda$.
  4. [Section 6.1, proof of Theorem 6.3] The notation is inconsistent: the map defined earlier as $\Phi$ is later written as $\varphi$, as in '$B=\varphi(aA_1a)$'. Please standardize to $\Phi$ throughout the proof.
  5. [References] The reference entry '[Jo98]' contains an extraneous trailing '.thm' after the page numbers; it should read '1093--1106'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the central tensor-decomposition claims are derived from published, independent theorems and are not restatements of their own inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain for the main theorem (Theorem 1.1) runs Corollary 6.2 through Lemma 6.5, Theorems 6.8 and 6.9, and Lemma 6.10. Each transition applies a distinct measure-rigidity statement: Corollary 6.2 reduces a finite-index commuting pair to an intertwining into L(Σ); Lemma 6.5 upgrades intertwining to spatial commensurability using virtual primeness of L(Σ); Theorem 6.8 converts commensurability with L(Σ) into existence of a commuting subgroup Ω via Theorem 6.6, quoted as Claims 4.7–4.12 of [CdSS15]; and Theorem 6.9 produces the direct product splitting. No step restates the conclusion as a hypothesis. Theorem 6.6 is a published theorem of the same research group, but it has its own proof, hypotheses that do not include the tensor decomposition, and a conclusion that is genuinely weaker than the direct-product splitting of Γ. The new notion 'spatially commensurable' (Definition 6.1) is a definition, not a renamed version of the theorem's conclusion. The same pattern holds for Theorems 6.13 and 6.14, which rely on published results such as [IPV10, Corollary 4.3] and [CSU13, Theorem 3.1] for the wreath-product and McDuff-group cases; these are external theorems with proofs, not fitted parameters or predictions forced by construction. The only textual concern is in the proof of Theorem 6.8, where ww* is asserted to satisfy (6.19) and is then used as the central projection required by Theorem 6.6; the text does not explicitly prove centrality of ww* in L(Σ)' ∩ L(Γ). That is a potential proof-gap or correctness issue, not a circularity, because even if the gap is real, the theorem is not being assumed in its own proof. Accordingly, no circular step is identified. The paper's self-citations are dense, but they provide independent published support rather than reducing the main claims to their own conclusions.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a stack of published rigidity theorems, several from the same research group, plus standard subfactor theory. No free parameters are fitted and no empirical entities are postulated; the amplification scalar t in the theorems is a conclusion, not an input.

assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Popa's intertwining theorem (Theorem 3.1) and the derived criteria for embedding subalgebras are used throughout.
    Chapter 3 records the theorem; every main proof invokes intertwining to place a tensor factor inside L(Σ) or L(Γ_I).
  • domain assumption Vaes' theorem on normalizers inside amalgamated free products (Theorem 5.4, [Va13]).
    Theorem 6.1 case-splits using this theorem; without it the amalgam splitting argument has no engine.
  • domain assumption Ioana's non-relative-amenability result (Corollary 6.2, [Io12, Theorem 7.1]) for L(Γ1 ∗Σ Γ2) relative to L(Σ).
    Corollary 6.2 relies on it to pass from von Neumann algebraic assumptions to the group setting.
  • domain assumption Theorem 6.6 from [CdSS15] (finite-index commensurability implies an almost direct product of groups).
    It is the bridge from commensurable corners to the group splitting in Theorem 6.8 and hence Theorem 1.1.
  • domain assumption Theorem 6.12 ([IPV10, Corollary 4.3]) for wreath product algebras.
    This dichotomy is the main tool in the proof of Theorem 6.13.
  • domain assumption [CSU13, Theorem 3.1] on central sequences in crossed products by wreath products.
    Used in Theorem 6.13 to contradict property Gamma for products of wreath product factors.
  • standard math Standard finite-index subfactor toolbox: Jones basic construction, Downward basic construction, Pimsner-Popa index ([Jo81], [PP86]).
    Chapter 4 states these; they support Lemma 6.5 and Theorem 6.8.
  • standard math [KS70, Theorem 10] on subgroups of amalgamated free products.
    Lemma 6.10 uses it to deduce the direct product splitting of an amalgam from a finite-index subgroup inclusion.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Classification of tensor decompositions for II$_1$ factors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6JWX4CJF

@misc{pith2026190807440,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Classification of tensor decompositions for II$_1$ factors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6JWX4CJF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07440}
}
abstract

In the mid thirties Murray and von Neumann found a natural way to associate a von Neumann algebra $L(\Gamma)$ to any countable discrete group $\Gamma$. Classifying $L(\Gamma)$ in term of $\Gamma$ is a notoriously complex problem as in general the initial data tends to be lost in the von Neumann algebraic regime. An important problem in the theory of von Neumann algebras is to completely describe all possible tensor decompositions of a given group von Neumann algebra $L(\Gamma)$. In this direction the main goal is to investigate how exactly a tensor decomposition of $L(\Gamma)$ relates to the underlying group $\Gamma$. In this dissertation we introduce several new classes of groups $\Gamma$ for which all tensor decompositions of $L(\Gamma)$ are parametrized by the canonical direct product decompositions of $\Gamma$. Specifically, we show that whenever $L(\Gamma)\cong M_1\bar\otimes M_2$ where $M_i$ are any diffuse von Neumann algebras then there exists a non-canonical direct product decomposition $\Gamma=\Gamma_1\times\Gamma_2$ such that up to amplifications we have that $M_1\cong L(\Gamma_1)$ and $M_2\cong L(\Gamma_2)$. Our class include large classes of icc (infinite conjugacy class) amalgamated free products and wreath product groups. In addition we obtain similar classifications of tensor decompositions for the von Neumann algebras associated with the $T_0$ and $T_1$ group functors introduced by McDuff in $1969$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Anantharaman and S

    C. Anantharaman and S. Popa, An introduction to II _1 factors, University of California, Los Angeles

  2. [2]

    N. P. Brown, N. Ozawa, C^ -algebras and finite-dimensional approximations , Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 88, AMS, Providence, RI

  3. [3]

    Boutonnet, On solid ergodicity for Gaussian action, J

    R. Boutonnet, On solid ergodicity for Gaussian action, J. Funct. Anal. 263 (2012), 1040--1063

    2012

  4. [4]

    Boutonnet, C

    R. Boutonnet, C. Houdayer, and S. Raum, Amalgamated free product type III factors with at most one Cartan subalgebra, Compos. Math. 150 (2014), 143--174

    2014

  5. [5]

    Bekka, P

    B. Bekka, P. de la Harpe, and A. Valette, Kazhdan property (T), New Mathematical Monographs, vol. 11, CUP, Cambridge 2008

    2008

  6. [6]

    Blackdar, Operator Algebras, Theory of C ^* -algebras and von Neumann Algebras

    B. Blackdar, Operator Algebras, Theory of C ^* -algebras and von Neumann Algebras

  7. [7]

    Chifan, R

    I. Chifan, R. de Santiago, and T. Sinclair, W ^* -rigidity for the von Neumann algebras of products of hyperbolic groups, Geom. Funct. Anal. 26 (2016), 136--159

    2016

  8. [8]

    Chifan, R

    I. Chifan, R. de Santiago, and W. Sucpikarnon, Tensor product decompositions of II_1 factors arising from extensions of amalgamated free product groups, Comm. Math. Phys. 364 (2018), 1163--1194

    2018

Show all 91 references
  1. [9]

    Chifan, C

    I. Chifan, C. Houdayer, Bass-Serre rigidity results in von Neumann algebras, Duke Math. J. 153 (2010), 23--54

    2010

  2. [10]

    Chifan, A

    I. Chifan, A. Ioana, Amalgamated free product rigidity for group von Neumann algebras, Preprint. arXiv:1705.07350

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    Choda, A Galois correspondence in a von Neumann algebra, Tohoku Math

    H. Choda, A Galois correspondence in a von Neumann algebra, Tohoku Math. J. 30(1978), 491--504

    1978

  4. [12]

    Chifan, A

    I. Chifan, A. Ioana, Ergodic subequivalence relations induced by a Bernoulli action, Geom. Funct. Anal. 20 (2010), 53--67

    2010

  5. [13]

    Chifan, A

    I. Chifan, A. Ioana and Y. Kida, W^* -superrigidity for arbitrary actions of central quotients of braid groups, Math. Ann. 361 (2015), 563--582

    2015

  6. [14]

    Chifan, Y

    I. Chifan, Y. Kida, S. Pant, Primeness Results for von Neumann Algebras Associated with Surface Braid Groups, Int. Math. Res. Not. 16 (2016), 4807--4848

    2016

  7. [15]

    Connes, Classification of injective factor, Ann

    A. Connes, Classification of injective factor, Ann. of Math. 101 (1976), 73--115

    1976

  8. [16]

    Chifan and J

    I. Chifan and J. Peterson, Some unique group measure space decomposition results, Duke Math. J. 162 (2013), no. 11, 1923--1966

    2013

  9. [17]

    Chifan, S

    I. Chifan, S. Popa and O. Sizemore, Some OE and W^* -rigidity results for actions by wreath product groups, J. Funct. Anal. 263 (2012), 3422--3448

    2012

  10. [18]

    Chifan, T

    I. Chifan, T. Sinclair, On the structural theory of II _1 factors of negatively curved groups, Ann. Sci. \' E c. Norm. Sup. 46 (2013), no. 1, 1--34

    2013

  11. [19]

    Chifan, T

    I. Chifan, T. Sinclair, and B. Udrea, On the structural theory of II _1 factors of negatively curved groups, II. Actions by product groups, Adv. Math. 245 (2013), 208--236

    2013

  12. [20]

    Chifan, T

    I. Chifan, T. Sinclair, B. Udrea, Inner amenability for groups and central sequences in factors, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 36 (2016), no. 4, 1106--1029

    2016

  13. [21]

    Drimbe, D

    D. Drimbe, D. Hoff, A. Ioana, Prime II _1 factors arising from irreducible lattices in products of rank one simple Lie groups, J. Reine Angew. Math. to appear, arXiv:1611.02209

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    Dabraowski and A

    Y. Dabraowski and A. Ioana, Unbounded derivations, free dilations and indecomposability results for II _1 factors , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 368 (2016), no. 7, 4525--4560

    2016

  15. [23]

    Dixmier and E.C

    J. Dixmier and E.C. Lance, Deux nouveaux facteurs de type II _1 , Invent. Math. 7 (1969), 226--234

    1969

  16. [24]

    de Santiago, S

    R. de Santiago, S. Pant, Classification of Tensor Decompositions of II1 Factors Associated With Poly-Hyperbolic Groups, arXiv:1802.09083

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    Fima, A note on the von Neumann algebra of a Baumslag-Solitar group, C

    P. Fima, A note on the von Neumann algebra of a Baumslag-Solitar group, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 349 (2011), 25--27

    2011

  18. [26]

    Ge, On maximal injective subalgebras of factors, Adv

    L. Ge, On maximal injective subalgebras of factors, Adv. Math. 118 (1996), no. 1, 34--70

    1996

  19. [27]

    Ge, Applications of Free Entropy to Finite von Neumann Algebras, II Ann,

    L. Ge, Applications of Free Entropy to Finite von Neumann Algebras, II Ann,. of Math. Second Series, 147, No. 1 (Jan., 1998), pp. 143--157

    1998

  20. [28]

    Houdayer, Y

    C. Houdayer, Y. Isono, Unique prime factorization and the bicentralizer problem for a class of type III factors, Adv. Math. 305 (2017), 402--455

    2017

  21. [29]

    Hoff, von Neumann Algebras of Equivalence Relations with Nontrivial One-Cohomology

    D. Hoff, von Neumann Algebras of Equivalence Relations with Nontrivial One-Cohomology. J. Funct. Anal. 270 (2016), no. 4, 1501--1536

    2016

  22. [30]

    Houdayer, S

    C. Houdayer, S. Vaes. Type III factors with unique Cartan decomposition, J. Math\' e matiques Pures et Appliqu ' e es 100 (2013), 564-590

    2013

  23. [31]

    Ioana, W^* -superrigidity for Bernoulli actions of property (T) groups, J

    A. Ioana, W^* -superrigidity for Bernoulli actions of property (T) groups, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 24 (2011), 1175--1226

    2011

  24. [32]

    Ioana, Cartan subalgebras of amalgamated free product II _1 factors, Ann

    A. Ioana, Cartan subalgebras of amalgamated free product II _1 factors, Ann. Sci. \' E c. Norm. Sup.(4) 48 (2015), no. 1, 71--130

    2015

  25. [33]

    Ioana, J

    A. Ioana, J. Peterson, S. Popa, Amalgamated free products of w-rigid factors and calculation of their symmetry groups. Acta Math. 200 (2008), 85--153

    2008

  26. [34]

    Ioana, S

    A. Ioana, S. Popa and S. Vaes, A Class of superrigid group von Neumann algebras, Ann. of Math. (2) 178 (2013), 231--286

    2013

  27. [35]

    Isono, Some prime factorization results for free quantum group factors, J

    Y. Isono, Some prime factorization results for free quantum group factors, J. Reine Angew. Math. 722 (2017), 215--250

    2017

  28. [36]

    Isono, On fundamental groups of tensor product II _1 factors, preprint arXiv:1608.06426

    Y. Isono, On fundamental groups of tensor product II _1 factors, preprint arXiv:1608.06426

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Ioana and P

    A. Ioana and P. Spaas, II _1 factors with exotic central sequence algebras preprint, arXiv:1904.06816

    1904 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Peterson, Notes on von Neumann algebras, Vanderbilt University, 2013

    J. Peterson, Notes on von Neumann algebras, Vanderbilt University, 2013

    2013

  31. [39]

    Jones, Index for subfactors, Invent

    V.F.R. Jones, Index for subfactors, Invent. Math. 72 (1983), 1--25

    1983

  32. [40]

    Jolissaint, Central Sequences in the Factor Associated with the Thompson Group F, Annales de l'Institut Fourier 48 (1998), 1093--1106.thm

    P. Jolissaint, Central Sequences in the Factor Associated with the Thompson Group F, Annales de l'Institut Fourier 48 (1998), 1093--1106.thm

    1998

  33. [41]

    Karrass, D

    A. Karrass, D. Solitar, The subgroups of a free product of two groups with an amalgamated subgroup, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 150 (1970), 227--255

    1970

  34. [42]

    McDuff, Central sequences and the hyperfinite factor, Proc

    D. McDuff, Central sequences and the hyperfinite factor, Proc. London Math. Soc. 21 (1970), 443--461

    1970

  35. [43]

    Murray, J

    F.J. Murray, J. von Neumann, On rings of operators, Ann. Math. 37 (1936), 116--229

    1936

  36. [44]

    Murray, J

    F.J. Murray, J. von Neumann, Rings of operators IV, Ann. Math. 44 (1943), 716--808

    1943

  37. [45]

    Ozawa, S

    N. Ozawa, S. Popa, Some prime factorization results for type II _1 factors, Invent. Math. 156 (2004), 223--234

    2004

  38. [46]

    Ozawa, S

    N. Ozawa, S. Popa, On a class of II _1 factors with at most one Cartan subalgebra, Ann. Math. 172 (2010), 713--749

    2010

  39. [47]

    Ozawa, Solid von Neumann algebras, Acta Math

    N. Ozawa, Solid von Neumann algebras, Acta Math. 192 (2004), 111--117

    2004

  40. [48]

    Ozawa, A Kurosh-type theorem for type II _1 factors, Int

    N. Ozawa, A Kurosh-type theorem for type II _1 factors, Int. Math. Res. Not. (2006), Art. ID 97560, 21

    2006

  41. [49]

    Peterson, L^2 -rigidity in von Neumann algebras, Invent

    J. Peterson, L^2 -rigidity in von Neumann algebras, Invent. Math. 175 (2009) no. 2, 417--433

    2009

  42. [50]

    Popa, Strong rigidity of II _1 factors arising from malleable actions of w -rigid groups I, Invent

    S. Popa, Strong rigidity of II _1 factors arising from malleable actions of w -rigid groups I, Invent. Math. 165 (2006), 369--408

    2006

  43. [51]

    Popa, On Ozawa's property for free group factors, Int

    S. Popa, On Ozawa's property for free group factors, Int. Math. Res. Not. (2007), no. 11, 10pp

    2007

  44. [52]

    Popa, On the Superrigidity of Malleable Actions with Spectral Gap, J

    S. Popa, On the Superrigidity of Malleable Actions with Spectral Gap, J. Am. Math. Soc. 21(2008), no. 4, 981--1000

    2008

  45. [53]

    Popa, Classification of subfactors and their endomorphisms, CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol

    S. Popa, Classification of subfactors and their endomorphisms, CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol. 86, Published for the Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences, Washington, DC; by the American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1995

    1995

  46. [54]

    Popa, Orthogonal pairs of * -subalgebras in finite von Neumann algebras, J

    S. Popa, Orthogonal pairs of * -subalgebras in finite von Neumann algebras, J. Operator Th. 9 (1983), no. 2, 253--268

    1983

  47. [55]

    Pimsner, S

    M. Pimsner, S. Popa, Entropy and index for subfactors, Ann. Sci. \' E cole Norm. Sup. 19 (1986), 57--106

    1986

  48. [56]

    S. Popa, S. Vaes, Unique Cartan decomposition for II _1 factors arising from arbitrary actions of free groups, Acta Math. 212 (2014), 141--198

    2014

  49. [57]

    Sinclair, Strong solidity of group factors from lattices in SO(n,1) and SU(n,1) , J

    T. Sinclair, Strong solidity of group factors from lattices in SO(n,1) and SU(n,1) , J. Funct. Anal. 260 (2011), no. 11, 3209--3221

    2011

  50. [58]

    Sinclair and R

    A. Sinclair and R. Smith, Finite von Neumann Algebra and Masas

  51. [59]

    J. O. Sizemore and A. Winchester, Unique prime decomposition results for factors coming from wreath products, Pacific J. Math. 265 (2013), no. 1, 221--232

    2013

  52. [60]

    Vaes, Explicit computations of all finite index bimodules for a family of II _1 factors, Ann

    S. Vaes, Explicit computations of all finite index bimodules for a family of II _1 factors, Ann. Sci. \' E c. Norm. Sup. 41 (2008), 743--788

    2008

  53. [61]

    Vaes, Normalizers inside amalgamated free products von Neumann algebras, Publ

    S. Vaes, Normalizers inside amalgamated free products von Neumann algebras, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 50 (2014), 695--721

    2014

  54. [62]

    Agol, The virtual Henken conjecture, Doc

    I. Agol, The virtual Henken conjecture, Doc. Math. 18 (2013), 1045--1087. With an appendix by I. Agol, D. Groves, and J. Manning

    2013

  55. [63]

    Antolín, A

    Y. Antolín, A. Minasyan, Tits alternatives for graph products, J. Reine Angew. Math. 704 (2015), 55--83

    2015

  56. [64]

    Bhattacharjee, Constructing finitely presented infinite nearly simple groups, Comm

    M. Bhattacharjee, Constructing finitely presented infinite nearly simple groups, Comm. Algebra 22 (1994), 4561--4589

    1994

  57. [65]

    Burger, S

    M. Burger, S. Mozes, Lattices in products of trees, Inst. Hautes \` E tudes Sci. Pub. S\' e r. I Math. 92 (2001), 151--194

    2001

  58. [66]

    Camm, Simple free products, J

    R. Camm, Simple free products, J. London Math. Soc. 28 (1953), 66--76

    1953

  59. [67]

    Caspers, Absence of Cartan subalgebras for right-angled Hecke von Neumann algebras, Preprint arXiv:1601.00593

    M. Caspers, Absence of Cartan subalgebras for right-angled Hecke von Neumann algebras, Preprint arXiv:1601.00593

    arXiv

  60. [68]

    Caspers, P

    M. Caspers, P. Fima, Graph products of operator algebras, J. Noncommut. Geom. 11 (2017), 367--411

    2017

  61. [69]

    Chifan, R

    I. Chifan, R. de Santiago, T. Sinclair, W^* -rigidity for the von Neumann algebras of products of hyperbolic groups, Geom. Funct. Anal. 26 (2016), 136--159

    2016

  62. [70]

    Chifan and S

    I. Chifan and S. Das, An older question of Popa, Preprint 2017

    2017

  63. [71]

    Chifan, Y

    I. Chifan, Y. Kida, OE and W^* -superrigidity results for actions by surface braid groups, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 111 (2015), 1431--1470

    2015

  64. [72]

    Dixmier, Quelques propri\'et\'es des suites centrales dans les facteurs de type II _1 , Invent

    J. Dixmier, Quelques propri\'et\'es des suites centrales dans les facteurs de type II _1 , Invent. Math. 7 (1969), 215--225

    1969

  65. [73]

    Dahmani, V

    F. Dahmani, V. Guirardel, D. Osin, Hyperbolically embedded subgroups and rotating families in groups acting on hyperbolic spaces, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 245 (2017), no. 1156, 1--164

    2017

  66. [74]

    de Cornulier, Infinite conjugacy classes ingroups acting on trees, Groups Geom

    Y. de Cornulier, Infinite conjugacy classes ingroups acting on trees, Groups Geom. Dyn. 3 (2009) 267-277

    2009

  67. [75]

    de Santiago, S

    R. de Santiago, S. Pant, Tensor decompositions for II _1 Factors of poly-hyperbolic groups, Preprint, 2017

    2017

  68. [76]

    Green, Graph Products of Groups PhD Thesis, The University of Leeds, 1990, http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/236/

    E. Green, Graph Products of Groups PhD Thesis, The University of Leeds, 1990, http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/236/

    1990

  69. [77]

    Hagelund, D

    F. Hagelund, D. Wise, Special cube complexes, Geom. Funct. Anal. 17 (2008), 1551--1620

    2008

  70. [78]

    Higman, A finitely generated infinite simple group, J

    G. Higman, A finitely generated infinite simple group, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 26 (1951), 61--64

    1951

  71. [79]

    D. F. Holt, S. Rees, Generalising some results about right-angled Artin groups to graph products of groups, J. Algebra 371 (2012), 94--104

    2012

  72. [80]

    Houdayer, S

    C. Houdayer, S. Popa, S. Vaes, A class of groups for which every action is W* -superrigid , Groups, Geometry, and Dynamics 7 (2013), 577--590

    2013

  73. [81]

    Krstic, J

    S. Krstic, J. McCool, Free quotients of SL_2(R[x]) , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 1125 (1997), 1585--1588

    1997

  74. [82]

    Minasyan, D

    A. Minasyan, D. Osin, Acylindrical hyperbolicity of groups acting on trees, Math. Ann. 362 (2015), 1055--1105

    2015

  75. [83]

    Monod, Variations on a theme by Higman, Exposition

    N. Monod, Variations on a theme by Higman, Exposition. Math. 35 (2017), 226--235

    2017

  76. [84]

    Popa, Universal construction of subfactors, J

    S. Popa, Universal construction of subfactors, J. Reine Angew. Math. 543 (2002), 39--81

    2002

  77. [85]

    S. Popa, S. Vaes, Strong rigidity of generalized Bernoulli actions and computations of their symmetry groups. Adv. in Math. 217 (2008), 833--872

    2008

  78. [86]

    S. Popa, S. Vaes, Unique Cartan decomposition for II _1 factors arising from arbitrary actions of hyperbolic groups , J. Reine Angew. Math. 694 (2014), 215--239

    2014

  79. [87]

    Schupp, Small cancellation theory over free products with amalgamation, Math

    P. Schupp, Small cancellation theory over free products with amalgamation, Math. Ann. 193 (1971), 255--264

    1971

  80. [88]

    Serre, Trees, Translated from the French original by John Stillwell

    J-P. Serre, Trees, Translated from the French original by John Stillwell. Corrected 2nd printing of the 1980 English translation. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003. x+142 pp

    1980

  81. [89]

    Ueda, Remarks on HNN extensions in operator algebras, Illinois J

    Y. Ueda, Remarks on HNN extensions in operator algebras, Illinois J. Math. 52 (2008), 705--725

    2008

  82. [90]

    Vaes, One-cohomology and the uniqueness of the group measure space decomposition of a II _1 factor, Math

    S. Vaes, One-cohomology and the uniqueness of the group measure space decomposition of a II _1 factor, Math. Ann. 355 (2013), no. 2, 661--696

    2013

  83. [91]

    D. T. Wise, Research announcement: the structure of groups with a quasiconvex hierarchy, Electron. Res. Announc. Math. Sci. 16 (2009), 44--55. thm lemma7.2Io10 Let Q M=B be a von Neumann algebra of a crossed product von Neuman algebra, _0< be a subgroup and let :M M L( ') be a...

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.