Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 28 references

A false data injection attack method for generator dynamic state estimation

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read An attack vector built from the measurement Jacobian hides false data from residual-based detectors in generator dynamic state estimation.

desk verdict A competent but low-novelty application of the standard a=Hc FDI attack to generator dynamic state estimation; the simulation evidence is real, but the undetectability proof is flawed for the Kalman-type filters actually used. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07689 v1 pith:BB2KIMUQ submitted 2019-08-18 eess.SY cs.SYeess.SP

Yang Li , Zhi Li , Liang Chen , Guoqing Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SYcs.SYeess.SP
keywords falsedatainjectionattackgeneratordynamicstateestimationcubatureKalmanfilterrobustresidual-basedbaddetectionPMUpowersystemcybersecurity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that an attacker can corrupt generator dynamic state estimation, the real-time estimate of a machine's power angle, speed, and internal voltages, without being caught by standard residual-based bad-data detection. The attack vector is built as $a=Hc$, where $H$ is the Jacobian of the linearized generator measurement equation and $c$ is a small error added to the state estimate; the paper argues that under this choice the measurement residuals before and after the attack are equal, so the injected data looks normal. The authors describe this as the first FDI attack model aimed at generator dynamic state estimation, and test it with the cubature Kalman filter (CKF) and a robust variant (RCKF) under three attack strengths on two test systems. If correct, this means an adversary with knowledge of the measurement model can quietly degrade the situational-awareness data that operators use for monitoring and control.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the attack vector $a=Hc$, formed from the Jacobian $H$ of the linearized generator measurement equation and a state-error vector $c$. The argument turns on the residual-invariance identity $r_a=z_a-H\hat{x}_a=(z+Hc)-H(\hat{x}+c)=z-H\hat{x}=r$, which holds when the post-attack state estimate equals $\hat{x}+c$; the Taylor expansion of the measurement function makes $H$ available, and the residual-based bad-data detector with threshold $B_J$ is the mechanism the attack exploits by keeping the residual below the detection threshold. In the simulations, CKF supplies the nonlinear filtering, and RCKF modifies the measurement-noise covariance through median-based robust estimation to resist outliers.

What would settle it

Run the same CKF or RCKF estimator on the generator model, inject a known attack vector $a=Hc$ with nonzero $c$, and compute the post-attack estimate $\hat{x}_a$; if $\hat{x}_a-\hat{x}$ differs from $c$ by more than the residual threshold $B_J$ over time, the residual-invariance identity fails and the attack becomes detectable. A direct residual check comparing $r_a=z_a-H\hat{x}_a$ with $r=z-H\hat{x}$ in the nonlinear filter would settle the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that false data can be injected into generator dynamic state estimation by choosing the attack vector $a=Hc$, where $H$ is the Jacobian matrix obtained by Taylor-linearizing the generator measurement equation and $c$ is a vector of errors that the attack introduces into the estimated states. Equation (17) states the key identity: after the attack the measurement residual becomes $r_a=z_a-H\hat{x}_a=z-H\hat{x}=r$, so the residual is unchanged and residual-based bad data detection cannot flag the data. The paper then treats $c$ as a zero-mean Gaussian vector with three standard deviations (0.01, 0.1, 1) and simulates the attack through CKF and RCKF dynamic state estimation on the IEEE 9-bus and New England 16-machine 68-bus systems. In both systems the CKF estimates of power angle and angular velocity deviate increasingly from the true values as attack strength grows, while RCKF estimates shift less but still show rising error, which the paper reads as confirming that the proposed FDI attack is effective against both filters.

Load-bearing premise

The attack's stealth rests on the assumption that after injecting $a=Hc$, the dynamic estimator's state estimate becomes exactly $\hat{x}+c$; this shift-by-$c$ property is proven for linear static estimators but is assumed without proof for the nonlinear CKF and RCKF filters in this paper.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • An attacker who knows the generator measurement Jacobian can corrupt dynamic state estimates while the residual-based bad-data detector reports normal operation.
  • Stronger attacks, modeled by a larger standard deviation of $c$, push the CKF estimates of power angle and angular velocity farther from the true values in both test systems.
  • The robust CKF reduces but does not eliminate the attack's effect, so robust filtering alone does not fully protect generator dynamic state estimation.
  • Because the same construction is tested on a 9-bus and a 16-machine 68-bus system, the attack is not specific to one small test network.
  • The computation time of both filters stays well below the PMU sampling interval in the simulations, so the attack and its effects are compatible with real-time dynamic state estimation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the residual-invariance identity is exact for a linear estimator, but for the nonlinear CKF/RCKF the paper assumes rather than proves that the post-attack estimate shifts by exactly $c$; measuring the actual shift in a nonlinear filter would show how far the stealth guarantee degrades.
  • Editorial inference: the attack requires knowing the measurement equation and its Jacobian, so it targets a well-informed adversary; a defender could respond by making the measurement model uncertain or by checking consistency between PMU channels over time rather than relying on instantaneous residuals.
  • Editorial inference: the same $a=Hc$ construction should extend to other derivative-based nonlinear estimators such as extended or unscented Kalman filters, since it only uses the linearized measurement map.
  • Editorial inference: the paper sets the detection threshold $B_J$ empirically; an adaptive threshold calibrated from residual history might detect these attacks even though a fixed threshold does not.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a false data injection (FDI) attack method targeting generator dynamic state estimation. The authors linearize the generator measurement equation with a Taylor expansion, define the attack vector as a = Hc, where H is the measurement Jacobian and c is a state-error vector, and claim that because the measurement residuals before and after the attack are equal (Eq. 17), conventional residual-based bad data detection cannot identify the false data. Three attack severities are tested with the cubature Kalman filter (CKF) and a robust cubature Kalman filter (RCKF) on the IEEE 9-bus system and the New England 16-machine 68-bus system; the simulations show CKF estimates degrading under attack while RCKF estimates remain close to the true values.

Significance. If the residual-invariance claim were valid, the proposed attack would be a simple and practical way to compromise generator dynamic state estimation while evading residual-based bad data detection, which is a relevant concern for PMU-based monitoring and control. The paper also delivers a consistent simulation demonstration that an attack of the form a = Hc degrades CKF estimates while RCKF retains some robustness. However, the central theoretical claim of undetectability is not established: it relies on an assumption about how the filter's state estimate shifts under attack that is generally false for the CKF and RCKF used in the paper. The contribution as a stealth-attack method is therefore not supported; what remains is an empirical study of estimation degradation under a particular attack injection.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Eqs. (16)-(17)] The residual-invariance derivation assumes that after the attack the state estimate becomes \hat{x}_a = \hat{x} + c. This is not true for the CKF and RCKF estimators used in Section 5. From the CKF measurement update, Eq. (32), the attacked posterior is \hat{x}_a = \hat{x} + W(z_a - \hat{z}) = \hat{x} + W(z - \hat{z}) + WHc, so the attacked residual is r_a = z_a - H\hat{x}_a = r + H(I - WH)c. Equality of residuals holds only if H(I-WH)c = 0, a condition that is neither stated nor satisfied for the 3x4 Jacobian in Eq. (13). The proof of undetectability therefore fails for the actual estimators used in the simulations.
  2. [Section 2, Eqs. (18)-(19)] The bound in Eq. (18) controls only the term a - Hc, which is zero by construction, but the actual residual increment under the Kalman-type update is H(I-WH)c, as shown above. That increment is not bounded or controlled in the manuscript. Consequently, the threshold condition in Eq. (19), r_a <= J_B, is not established; whether the attack evades detection is a magnitude-dependent question that depends on the gain W, the matrix H, and the size of c.
  3. [Section 5, Figs. 3-21 and Tables 2-3] The simulation section reports estimation error metrics \tau_1 and \tau_2 and plots of estimated power angle and angular velocity, but it never reports the attacked measurement residual r_a or compares it with the detection threshold J_B. The metrics used measure estimation accuracy, not stealth. Therefore the simulations demonstrate that the attack degrades CKF estimates, but they do not demonstrate the paper's central claim that the attack is invisible to residual-based bad data detection. This missing evidence is load-bearing because the title and abstract emphasize the avoidance of conventional bad data detection.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (10)] The typeset version of Eq. (10) and the surrounding derivation of the linearized measurement equation are garbled, with repeated and misplaced partial derivatives, which makes it difficult to verify the construction of the Jacobian H.
  2. [Section 5.3 and 5.4] The bad data detection threshold J_B is set empirically to 2.0 for the IEEE 9-bus system and 1.5 for the 16-machine 68-bus system, and the RCKF prior thresholds C_i are chosen by visual inspection of residual plots; no sensitivity analysis or systematic selection procedure is given.
  3. [Abstract and Section 0] The claim that this is the first FDI attack method for generator dynamic state estimation is too strong without a more precise comparison to the existing FDI literature for static state estimation and to related dynamic-estimation attack work, such as the Kalman-filter attack studies cited in the introduction.
  4. [Section 5.2, Eq. (44)] The denominator of \tau_2 sums squared differences involving z_{it}, which appears to be a measurement value, while the numerator uses the true state; the definition should be clarified to avoid confusion about what the ratio measures.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Eq. (17)'s stealth property is definitional: a=Hc is chosen to cancel the residual difference, and the attacked-state shift is stipulated rather than derived from CKF/RCKF.

  1. self definitional [Section 2, Eqs. (16)-(17)]
    "r_a = z_a - H\hat{x}_a = z + a - H(\hat{x}+c) = z - H\hat{x} + a - Hc; 显然，当 a=Hc，有式（17）成立，结果显示在 FDI 攻击前后的量测残差相等"

    The residual difference is r_a - r = a - Hc by Eq. (16), so setting a = Hc makes Eq. (17) an algebraic identity, not a discovered result. The abstract even says the attack-vector expressions were 'established' from the principle of equal residuals before and after attack. Thus the undetectability claim is the definition of the attack vector, and it also depends on stipulating \hat{x}_a = \hat{x}+c, the very shift that makes the cancellation work. No independent derivation from the generator model or the filters is given.

  2. other [Section 2, Eq. (16) vs Section 3.1, Eq. (32)]
    "进而状态变量估计值变为 \hat{x}_a = \hat{x} + c; 计算 k+1 时刻状态量估计值： \hat{x}_{k+1|k+1} = \hat{x}_{k+1|k} + W_{k+1}(z_{k+1} - \hat{z}_{k+1|k})"

    For CKF/RCKF the attacked measurement z_a = z + Hc enters Eq. (32), giving \hat{x}_a - \hat{x} = W H c, not c. Since W H is not generally the identity (W = P H^T (H P H^T + R)^{-1}), the invariance claimed by Eq. (17) does not follow from the filter actually used. The paper supplies the shift \hat{x}_a = \hat{x}+c as a premise, so the residual equality is true by construction only under that unproved, generally false assumption. This makes the central stealth claim load-bearing on an assumption equivalent to the conclusion.

full rationale

The paper's mathematical core is the standard linear FDI construction. The derivation of undetectability in Eqs. (16)-(17) reduces to the definition of the attack vector: the residual difference is a-Hc, so choosing a=Hc makes the residuals equal by algebra. This is a legitimate attack-design identity, but it is presented as a derived result and then imported into the nonlinear CKF/RCKF setting. The transfer requires \hat{x}_a=\hat{x}+c; the CKF update (32) would instead give \hat{x}_a=\hat{x}+WHc, so the premise is not established and is generally false. Thus the central stealth claim is partially circular and assumption-bound. The simulations independently show that CKF estimates degrade under the injected a=Hc (Tables 2 and 3), which is real empirical content, but no attacked-residual plots or residual-based detection outcomes are reported, so the stealth claim is not independently validated. The threshold B_J is admittedly set by experience and repeated simulation tests, further weakening the empirical stealth demonstration without being the main source of circularity. The citations to the authors' prior CKF/RCKF papers [1,2] are background algorithm references and are not load-bearing for the attack identity, so they do not add circularity. Overall score 6: one central 'prediction' reduces by construction, while the simulation component retains independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's attack model rests on the standard FDI condition a=Hc (Liu et al. 2011) and on several domain assumptions about linearization and filter response. The only quantities chosen by the authors are the detection thresholds J_B and C_i (fit to simulation results) and the attack severity scales sigma_c. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Bad data detection threshold J_B = 2.0 (IEEE 9-bus), 1.5 (New England 68-bus)
    Set after multiple simulation tests and used as the pass condition for attack stealth; changing it changes whether attacks are detected.
  • RCKF prior thresholds C_i = 1, 0.7, 0.7 (IEEE 9-bus); 0.67 (New England)
    Determined from CKF standardized residual curves; they control when measurement noise covariance is inflated in RCKF, so they affect the robust filter's behavior under attack.
  • Attack severity standard deviations sigma_c = 0.01, 0.1, 1 (Case 1, 2, 3)
    Chosen ad hoc to represent weak to strong attacks; the resulting attack vectors a=Hc depend directly on these values.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption First-order Taylor linearization of the generator measurement equation is valid; higher-order terms are negligible because generator state variables cannot change abruptly in electromechanical transients.
    Invoked in Section 2 before Eq. (10) to justify the linear model z=Hx+e; if the linearization error is not negligible, the residual invariance condition a=Hc is approximate at best.
  • domain assumption After an FDI attack with a=Hc, the attacked state estimate equals the original estimate plus the attack-induced error vector c (\hat{x}_a = \hat{x} + c).
    Used in Eq. (16); this shift property holds for linear unbiased estimators but is not proven for the nonlinear CKF and RCKF estimators used in the simulations.
  • domain assumption The residual-based bad data detector uses a threshold J_B, and any measurement whose residual is below J_B is accepted as valid.
    The attack's stealth is defined relative to this detector model (Eq. 19); real detectors may use different statistics or thresholds.
  • domain assumption The state error vector c introduced by the FDI attack is Gaussian with zero mean and chosen variance.
    Assumed for the attack scenarios (Table 1); the attack construction does not depend on a particular distribution, but the simulation results do.
  • domain assumption The generator dynamic model in Eqs. (2)-(4) and PMU measurement error statistics are accurate representations of the physical system.
    The simulations inherit these standard models from refs [1], [20], [21]; if the model is wrong, the attack effectiveness may differ.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A false data injection attack method for generator dynamic state estimation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BB2KIMUQ

@misc{pith2026190807689,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A false data injection attack method for generator dynamic state estimation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BB2KIMUQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07689}
}
read the original abstract

Accurate and reliable dynamic state quantities of generators are very important for real-time monitoring and control of the power system. The emergence of cyber attacks has brought new challenges to the state estimation of generators. Especially, false data injection (FDI) attacks deteriorate the accuracy of state estimation by injecting the false data into the measurement device. In this regard, this paper proposes for the first time an FDI attack model based on the dynamic state estimation of generators. Firstly, Taylor's formula was used to linearize the generator's measurement equation. Secondly, according to the principle that the measurement residuals before and after the FDI attack are equal, the expressions of the attack vectors were established, and they were applied to the measurement quantities to avoid the conventional bad data detection. Thereby, the FDI attacks were successfully implemented. Then, three attack scenarios were set according to the degree of the FDI attacks, and they were tested by the cubature Kalman filter (CKF) and the robust cubature Kalman filter (RCKF). Finally, the simulation results of the IEEE 9-bus system and the New England 16-machine 68-bus system verify the effectiveness of the proposed FDI attacks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    基于容积卡尔曼滤波的发电 机 动 态 状 态 估 计 [J]

    陈亮, 毕天姝, 李劲松, 等. 基于容积卡尔曼滤波的发电 机 动 态 状 态 估 计 [J]. 中 国 电 机 工 程 学 报 , 2014, 34(16):2706-2713. Chen Liang, Bi Tianshu, Li Jinsong, et al. Dynamic state estimator for synchronous machines based on cubature Kalman filter[J]. Proceedings of CSEE, 2014, 34(16):2706-2713

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    基于鲁棒容积卡尔曼滤波器 的 发 电 机 动 态 状 态 估 计[J]

    毕天姝, 陈亮, 薛安成, 等. 基于鲁棒容积卡尔曼滤波器 的 发 电 机 动 态 状 态 估 计[J]. 电 工 技 术 学 报, 2016, 31(4):163-169. Bi Tianshu, Chen Liang, Xue Anchen g, et al. Dynamic state estimator for synchronous -machines based on robust cubature Kalman Filter[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2016, 31(4):163-169

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    基于平方根容积卡尔曼滤波 的 发 电 机 动 态 状 态 估 计[J]

    安军, 杨振瑞, 周毅博, 等. 基于平方根容积卡尔曼滤波 的 发 电 机 动 态 状 态 估 计[J]. 电 工 技 术 学 报, 2017, 32(12):234-240 An Jun, Yang Zhenrui, Zhou Yibo, et al. Dynamic state estimation for synchronous -machines based on square root cubature Kalman filter[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2017, 32(12): 234-240

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Optimal scheduling of an isolated microgrid with battery storage considering load and renewable generation uncertainties[J]

    Li Y , Yang Z, Li G, et al. Optimal scheduling of an isolated microgrid with battery storage considering load and renewable generation uncertainties[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2019, 66(2): 1565 - 1575

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    广域测量系统可观性概率评 估及其在 PMU 优化配置中的应用 [J]

    罗深增，李银红，石东源. 广域测量系统可观性概率评 估及其在 PMU 优化配置中的应用 [J]. 电工技术学报 , 2018, 33(8):1844-1853. Luo ShenZeng，Li Yinhong，Shi DongYuan. Wide area monitoring system observability probabilistic evaluation and it’s application in optimal PMU placement[J]. Transactions of Chi na Electrotechnical Society , 2018, 33(8):1844-1853

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    配电网电力电子化的发 展 和 超 高 次 谐 波 新 问 题[J]

    肖湘宁，廖坤玉，唐松浩，等. 配电网电力电子化的发 展 和 超 高 次 谐 波 新 问 题[J]. 电 工 技 术 学 报, 2018, 33(4):707-720. Xiao Xiangning , Liao Kunyu , Tang Haosong , et al. Development of power-electronized distribution girds and the new supraharmonics issues[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2018, 33(4):707-720

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    乌克兰事件的启示:防范针 对电网的虚假数据注入攻击[J]

    赵俊华, 梁高琪, 文福拴, 等. 乌克兰事件的启示:防范针 对电网的虚假数据注入攻击[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2016, 40(7):149-151. Zhao Junhua, Liang G aoqi, Wen F ushuan, et al. Lessons learnt from Ukrainian blackout: protecting power grids against false data injection attacks[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2016, 40(7):149-151

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Forecasting -Aided imperfect false data injection attacks against power system nonlinear state estimation[J]

    Zhao J, Zhang G , Dong Z Y , et al. Forecasting -Aided imperfect false data injection attacks against power system nonlinear state estimation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2015, 7(1):6-8

    work page 2015

Show all 28 references
  1. [10]

    False data injection attacks against state estimation in electric power grids[J]

    Liu Y , Ning P, Reiter M K. False data injection attacks against state estimation in electric power grids[J]. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 2011, 14(1):1-33

    2011

  2. [11]

    False data attacks against AC state estimation with incomplete network information[J]

    Liu X, Li Z. False data attacks against AC state estimation with incomplete network information[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2016, 8(5):2239-2248

    2016

  3. [12]

    Short -term state forecasting-aided method for detection of smart grid general false data injection attacks[J]

    Zhao J B, Zhang G, Scala M L , et al. Short -term state forecasting-aided method for detection of smart grid general false data injection attacks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2015, 8(4):1580-1590

    2015

  4. [13]

    Detecting false data injection attacks against power system state estimation with fast Go -Decomposition (GoDec) approach[J]

    Li B, Ding T, Huang C, et al. Detecting false data injection attacks against power system state estimation with fast Go -Decomposition (GoDec) approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, DOI: 10.1109/TII.2018.2875529

    2018

  5. [14]

    Risk mitigation for dynamic state estimation against cyber attacks and unknown inputs[J]

    Taha A F, Qi J, Wang J, et al. Risk mitigation for dynamic state estimation against cyber attacks and unknown inputs[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2016, 9(2):886-899

    2016

  6. [15]

    Comparing Kalman filters and observers for power system dynamic state estimation with model uncertainty and malicious cyber attacks[J]

    Qi J, Taha A F, Wang J. Comparing Kalman filters and observers for power system dynamic state estimation with model uncertainty and malicious cyber attacks[J]. IEEE Access, 2018, 6:77155-77168

    2018

  7. [16]

    基于无迹变换强跟踪滤波 的发电机动态状态估计 [J]

    孙国强, 黄蔓云, 卫志农, 等. 基于无迹变换强跟踪滤波 的发电机动态状态估计 [J]. 中国电机工程学报 , 2016, 36(3): 615-623. Sun Guoqiang, Huang Manyun , Wei Zhinong, et al. Dynamic state estimation for synchronous machines based on unscented transformation of strong tracking filter[J]. Proceedings of the Csee, 2016, 36(3...

    2016

  8. [17]

    Dynamic state estimation in power system by applying the extended Kalman filter with unknown inputs to phasor measurements[J]

    Ghahremani E, Kamwa I. Dynamic state estimation in power system by applying the extended Kalman filter with unknown inputs to phasor measurements[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2011, 26(4): 2556-2566

    2011

  9. [18]

    Nonlinear Kalman filtering with divergence minimization[J]

    Gultekin S, Paisley J. Nonlinear Kalman filtering with divergence minimization[J]. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 2017, 65(23): 6319-6331

    2017

  10. [19]

    考虑量测坏数据的发电机 动态状态估计方法 [J]

    马安安, 江全元, 熊鸿韬, 等. 考虑量测坏数据的发电机 动态状态估计方法 [J]. 电力系统自动化 , 2017, 41(14): 140-146. Ma Anan, Jiang Quanyuan, Xiong Hongtao, et al. Dynamic state estimation method for generator considering measurement of bad data[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2017, 41(14):140-146

    2017

  11. [20]

    Estimation of the dynamic states of synchronous machines using an extended particle filter[J]

    Zhou N, Meng D, Lu S. Estimation of the dynamic states of synchronous machines using an extended particle filter[J]. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2013, 28(4): 4152-4161

    2013

  12. [21]

    Online state est imation of a synchronous generator using unscented Kalman filter from phasor measurements units[J]

    Ghahremani E, Kamwa I. Online state est imation of a synchronous generator using unscented Kalman filter from phasor measurements units[J]. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, 2011, 26(4): 1099-1108

    2011

  13. [22]

    输电网虚假数据攻击研究综 述[J]

    王先培, 田猛, 董政呈, 等. 输电网虚假数据攻击研究综 述[J]. 电网技术, 2016, 40(11):3406-3414. Wang Xianpei, Tian Meng, Do ng Zhengcheng, et al. A survey of research on false data attacks in transmission network[J]. Power System Technology, 2016, 40(11):3406-3414

    2016

  14. [23]

    基于拉格朗日乘子法的虚假 数据攻击策略[J]

    田猛, 王先培, 董政呈, 等. 基于拉格朗日乘子法的虚假 数据攻击策略[J]. 电力系统自动化, 2017,41(11):32-38. Tian Meng , Wang Xianpei , Dong Zhengcheng , e t al. Injected attack strategy for false data based on lagrange multipliers method[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2017, 41(11):32-38

    2017

  15. [24]

    Blind false data injection attack using PCA approximation method in smart grid[J]

    Yu Z H, Chin W L. Blind false data injection attack using PCA approximation method in smart grid[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2015, 6(3):1219-1226

    2015

  16. [25]

    基于中位数法的抗差总体最小 二乘估计[J]

    陶叶青, 高井祥, 姚一飞. 基于中位数法的抗差总体最小 二乘估计[J]. 测绘学报, 2016, 45(3):297-301. Tao Yeqing, Gao Jingxiang, Yao Yifei. Robust total least squares estimation based on median method[J]. Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica, 2016, 45(3):297-301

    2016

  17. [26]

    基于局部信息融合和估计投影 法的多区域电力系统状态估计[J]

    蔡永智, 陈皓勇, 万楚林. 基于局部信息融合和估计投影 法的多区域电力系统状态估计[J]. 电工技术学报, 2017, 32(1):69-77. Cai Yongzhi, Chen Haoyong, Wan Chulin. Multi -region power system state estimation based on local information fusion and estimated projection method[J]. Transact ions of China Electrotechnical Society, 2...

    2017

  18. [27]

    中压直流输电直流区域配电综合 电力系统静态状态估计方法研究 [J]

    肖润龙, 王刚, 李子梦. 中压直流输电直流区域配电综合 电力系统静态状态估计方法研究 [J]. 电工技术学报 , 2018, 33(13):3023-3033. Xiao Runlong, Wang Gang, Li Zimeng. Static estimation of the integrated power system with medium voltage DC and DC zonal distribution system[J]. Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, 20...

    2018

  19. [28]

    电力系统保护与控制 , 2018, 46(21):75-83

    怀全, 候小虎, 何良策, 一种含分布式电源的中低压配电 网状态估计方法研究 [J]. 电力系统保护与控制 , 2018, 46(21):75-83. Huai Quan, Hou Xiaohu, He Liangce . A method of state estimation for middle voltage and low voltage distribution network with distributed generations[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2018, 46(21):75-83

    2018

  20. [29]

    基于信息冗余的电力系统分布式状 态估计[J]

    胡春潮, 何杰, 马凯. 基于信息冗余的电力系统分布式状 态估计[J]. 电力系统保护与控制, 2017, 45(16):111-115. Hu Chunchao, He Jie, Ma Kai. Power system distributed state estimation based on information redundancy of secondary system[J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2017, 45(16):111-115. 作者简介 李 扬 男，1980 年生，博士...

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.