Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 76 references

Curvature properties of Melvin magnetic metric

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The Melvin magnetic metric is pseudosymmetric and of Roter type, the paper shows.

desk verdict A useful Melvin-specific catalogue of pseudosymmetry properties, but the printed constants are inconsistent with the metric as written. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.07859 v1 pith:TMC5UOED submitted 2019-08-20 math.DG

Absos Ali Shaikh , Akram Ali , Ali H. Alkhaldi , Dhyanesh Chakraborty This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DG MSC 53B2053B2553B3053B5053C1553C2553C35
keywords MelvinmagneticuniversewarpedproductmetricpseudosymmetricmanifoldRotertypequasi-EinsteinWeylconformalcurvaturetensorEin(2)Maxwell
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the Melvin magnetic metric, a static, cylindrically symmetric electrovac solution describing a self-gravitating bundle of parallel magnetic field lines, satisfies a long list of curvature identities that place it in several named classes of semi-Riemannian geometry. The authors show that with $f(r)=\ln(1+B_0 r^2/4)$, the metric is pseudosymmetric ($R\cdot R=L_1 Q(g,R)$), pseudosymmetric due to the Weyl conformal tensor ($C\cdot R=L_1 Q(g,R)$), of Roter type ($R=N_1 S\wedge S+N_2 g\wedge S+N_3 g\wedge g$), 2-quasi-Einstein and $Ein(2)$, with recurrent conformal curvature 2-forms and a pseudosymmetric Maxwell tensor. A sympathetic reader would care because Melvin's solution is one of the few exact, geodesically complete electrovac spacetimes, so placing it precisely in the hierarchy of pseudosymmetry and generalized Einstein conditions gives a concrete model for those classes and tests the general theory of warped-product curvature restrictions.

What carries the argument

The engine of the paper is a family of algebraic curvature identities called pseudosymmetric-type conditions, written with the Kulkarni-Nomizu product $\wedge$ and the tensors $A\cdot T$ and $Q(B,T)$. The specific relations $R\cdot R=L\,Q(g,R)$, $R\cdot R-Q(S,R)=L'\,Q(g,C)$, and the Roter-type decomposition $R=N_1 S\wedge S+N_2 g\wedge S+N_3 g\wedge g$ are the identities that carry the argument: once the component tables in Section 3 are accepted, substituting $f(r)=\ln(1+B_0 r^2/4)$ reduces each condition to an algebraic check. The key structural fact is that this particular $f$ satisfies $r f''+r f'^2-f'=0$, which is exactly the condition Lemma 3.2 and Lemma 3.3 identify as making the metric pseudosymmetric and Roter type.

What would settle it

Recompute independently, by hand or with a different symbol manipulator, every nonzero component of $R\cdot R$, $Q(g,R)$, $Q(S,R)$, and $C\cdot C$ for the Melvin metric (1.1); any mismatch with the displayed relations in Section 4, such as $(R\cdot R)_{132312}=- (R\cdot R)_{121323}=-e^{2f} f'(f'^2-f'')$, would overturn the classification.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 4.1: the Melvin magnetic metric (1.1) has vanishing scalar curvature and satisfies the pseudosymmetric-type identities $R\cdot R=L_1 Q(g,R)$ and $C\cdot R=L_1 Q(g,R)$ with $L_1=32B_0^2(4-B_0^2 r^2)/(4+B_0^2 r^2)^4$, as well as $R\cdot R-Q(S,R)=L_2 Q(g,C)$, $Q(S,C)=C\cdot R-R\cdot C$, and a linear relation $C\cdot R-R\cdot C=L_3 Q(g,R)+L_4 Q(S,R)$. It is also of Roter type with the explicit coefficients $N_1,N_2,N_3$ given; it is 2-quasi-Einstein, $Ein(2)$, and its conformal curvature 2-forms are recurrent with the displayed 1-form $\Pi$. Theorem 4.2 adds that the Maxwell tensor obeys $R\cdot F=L_F Q(g,F)$. In the authors' terms, Melvin spacetime is a non-semisymmetric pseudosymmetric warped product with a 3-dimensional pseudosymmetric base, a non-quasi-Einstein 2-quasi-Einstein warped product, and a model example of these curvature-restricted classes.

Load-bearing premise

The whole classification rests on the unverified claim that the displayed component tables in Section 3 are complete and correct; the paper gives no code or independent derivation, so if a single tabulated component is wrong, the pseudosymmetry and Roter-type conclusions in Theorem 4.1 collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Melvin spacetime becomes a concrete 4-dimensional example of a non-semisymmetric pseudosymmetric warped product with a 3-dimensional pseudosymmetric base, alongside Robertson-Walker and Schwarzschild examples.
  • Its Ricci tensor has rank $(S-\alpha g)=2$, so Melvin cannot be Einstein or quasi-Einstein; it belongs exactly to the 2-quasi-Einstein class.
  • Because it is Roter type, the entire Riemann curvature tensor is algebraically determined by the Ricci tensor and the metric through $R=N_1 S\wedge S+N_2 g\wedge S+N_3 g\wedge g$.
  • The recurrence 1-form for the conformal curvature 2-forms is explicitly $\Pi=(0,0,-16B_0^2 r/((4-B_0^2 r^2)(4+B_0^2 r^2)),0)$, so the recurrence property is checkable and not merely generic.
  • The Maxwell pseudosymmetry $R\cdot F=L_F Q(g,F)$ means the electromagnetic field of the solution participates in the same curvature-restricted scheme as the metric, not just as a source.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that Melvin's metric realizes both warped-product pseudosymmetry families in Remark 2.1 at once: it satisfies (2.2) and (2.3), so it is a single example linking those two general theorems.
  • One testable extension is to use the explicit coefficients $N_1,N_2,N_3,L_1,L_2$ as ground-truth labels for a computer algebra system or for a numerical relativity code checking whether a spacetime is pseudosymmetric or Roter type.
  • A physical speculation the authors do not pursue is that the curvature-restricted identities may encode the stability of the magnetic flux bundle, so other stable electrovac equilibria might also satisfy similar pseudosymmetry conditions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies curvature-restricted geometric structures of the Melvin magnetic metric. Section 2 collects the relevant definitions from the pseudosymmetric and Roter-type literature. Section 3 computes the Riemann, Ricci, Weyl, and associated tensors for a more general cylindrically symmetric warped metric (1.4) depending on a function f(r), and derives general identities: pseudosymmetry of the Weyl tensor, the pseudosymmetric-type condition R·R−Q(S,R)=LQ(g,C), generalized Roter structure, Ein(3), recurrent conformal 2-forms, and a criterion for the Roter-type condition. Section 4 substitutes f(r)=ln(1+B0 r^2/4) and claims Theorem 4.1: zero scalar curvature, pseudosymmetry and conformal pseudosymmetry with explicit L1, further pseudosymmetric-type identities, a Roter decomposition, 2-quasi-Einstein structure, Chaki generalized quasi-Einstein structure, Ein(2), and Riemann-compatible Ricci tensor. Theorem 4.2 claims that the Maxwell field is pseudosymmetric. The paper concludes that the Melvin spacetime is a model of these curvature classes.

Significance. If the claims were correct, the paper would be a useful reference example in the pseudo-symmetric warped-product literature, and the explicit coefficients would be convenient for readers who want to locate the Melvin metric in the Deszcz-school classification. The general-f part of Section 3 is systematic, and the use of external criteria such as Remark 2.2 of [25] and Theorem 6.7 of [15] is a legitimate structural strategy. However, the quantitative statements in Section 4 are not internally consistent as written: the B0 convention changes between the metric and the displayed constants, and the Maxwell field used in Theorem 4.2 is not the one defined in (1.2). These issues are load-bearing because Theorem 4.1 states explicit formulas rather than only qualitative class membership. The high-level classification may well survive after the convention is fixed, but the paper currently does not state a self-consistent set of theorems and needs a corrected, uniformly typed computation.

major comments (3)
  1. [§1, Eq. (1.1); §4, Theorem 4.1(ii),(viii)] The magnetic-field convention is inconsistent. The metric and the substitution after (1.1) use U_B=1+B0 r^2/4, so f(r)=ln(1+B0 r^2/4). Substituting this f into the Section 3 formula S11=-(f'+r f'')/r gives S11=-B0(1+B0 r^2/4)^{-2}, and the quantity L1 of Theorem 4.1(ii) computed from the paper's own LR becomes 32B0(4−B0 r^2)/(4+B0 r^2)^4, not the printed 32B0^2(4−B0^2 r^2)/(4+B0^2 r^2)^4. The printed constants are instead those obtained from f(r)=ln(1+B0^2 r^2/4). The same mismatch occurs in Theorem 4.1(viii): imposing S^2+λg=0 with the paper's own S-values under the printed convention gives denominators of the form (4+B0 r^2)^6, not (4+B0^2 r^2)^8. Thus no single reading of B0 makes Theorem 4.1 self-consistent. Please choose one convention and recompute all formulas and constants consistently.
  2. [§1, Eq. (1.2); §4, Theorem 4.2] The Maxwell field used in Theorem 4.2 is not the one defined in (1.2). From (1.2), the φr component is B0 r^2/U_B^2, which equals 16B0 r^2/(4+B0^2 r^2)^2 if one reads U_B=(4+B0^2 r^2)/4, whereas Theorem 4.2 states F24=8B0 r/(4+B0^2 r^2)^2. These differ by a factor of 2 and by one power of r. The relation R·F=LF Q(g,F) in Theorem 4.2 is therefore not derived from the printed Maxwell field; either (1.2) or the component F24 used in Theorem 4.2 must be corrected.
  3. [§3, Eqs. (3.1)–(3.6); Acknowledgement] The central algebraic input is not auditable. The paper states that all algebraic computations were performed by a program in Wolfram Mathematica, but no code, notebook, or output is provided, and the component tables (3.1)–(3.5) and the constants in Theorem 4.1 are presented without an independent derivation. Because every conclusion in Theorem 4.1 is obtained by substituting f into these tables, a single incorrect table entry would invalidate the classification. I recommend that the authors include the program or an ancillary notebook, or at least list the independent non-zero components together with their simplified forms.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§1, Eq. (1.2)] Equation (1.2) contains a typographical error: 'dφ ∧ dr2' should read 'dφ ∧ dr'.
  2. [§4, Theorem 4.1(vii)] The displayed formula for ‖δ‖ is garbled ('512B2 )'); it should be cleaned up and the B0 convention made uniform with the rest of the theorem.
  3. [Throughout] There are numerous spelling errors, e.g. 'pseodosymmetric' in Theorem 3.1 and 'Reimann' and 'Einstien' throughout; these should be corrected.
  4. [References] Reference [76] appears to duplicate reference [48] with different bibliographic data; the duplicate entry should be checked and removed.
  5. [§3, Example 3.2] The typeset differential equation appears to be rf''+r f'^2−f'=0 rather than the printed 'rf''+rf'−f'^2=0'; please correct the display.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the derivation is a direct component computation with classification steps relying on external theorems.

full rationale

I walked the claimed derivation chain and found no step in which a conclusion reduces by construction to an input. Section 3 computes the Christoffel symbols, Riemann, Ricci, Weyl, and the tensors R·R, Q(g,R), C·C, Q(g,C), Q(S,R) for the Melvin-type metric (1.4) by direct component algebra, then reads off pseudosymmetric identities and decompositions. Lemma 3.2 verifies R·R=LR Q(g,R) under the condition rf''+rf'^2-f'=0 by checking the components of D·R. Lemma 3.3 invokes Remark 2.2 of [25], which is a theorem of Deszcz, Plaue, and Scherfner, not of the present authors, to infer Roter type from the already-established pseudosymmetric relations. Corollary 3.1 invokes Theorem 6.7 of [15], a survey by Deszcz, G{\l}ogowska, Hot{\l}o\'s, and Sawicz, again external to this paper, to obtain the additional pseudosymmetric type and Ein(2)-type conditions. Theorem 4.1 then specializes f(r)=ln(1+B0 r^2/4) and substitutes the computed component formulas; the listed constants L1, L2, N1, N2, N3, alpha, and lambda are algebraic consequences of those components, not fitted parameters. Theorem 4.2 similarly computes R·F and Q(g,F) and takes their ratio. The many self-citations in the paper occur in definitions, terminology, and examples (e.g., quasi-Einstein, generalized Roter type, prior spacetime examples) and none of them is load-bearing for the central curvature claims. The absence of a published Mathematica notebook, and the apparent inconsistencies in some printed formulas noted by the skeptic, are verification and correctness concerns, not circularity: an erroneous computation would make the theorem false, not make the proof depend on its own conclusion. Accordingly, the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted constants and no invented entities; B0 is a parameter of the known Melvin solution. It relies on two external classification theorems from the pseudosymmetry literature and on an implicit domain restriction to the open set where the relevant curvature components are nonzero. All other machinery is standard differential geometry.

assumptions (3)
  • standard math Theorem 2 of Deszcz (1991) [11]: a warped product with 2-dimensional base and 2-dimensional fiber satisfies R·R - Q(S,R) = L'Q(g,C).
    Invoked in Remark 2.1 and used as background for the pseudosymmetric type condition that the paper checks for the 3+1 Melvin metric.
  • domain assumption Remark 2.2 of Deszcz, Plaue, and Scherfner (2013) [25]: on the set where C is nonzero, a manifold that is pseudosymmetric and satisfies R·R - Q(S,R) = L'Q(g,C) is Roter type.
    Used in Lemma 3.3 and Remark 3.1 to conclude Roter type and to write R as a combination of S∧S, g∧S, and g∧g.
  • domain assumption The Melvin metric is a warped product M = B x_F S^1 with base B = (R^3, e^{2f(r)}(-dt^2+dr^2+dz^2)), warping F(r) = r e^{-f(r)}, and all computations take r > 0 and restrict to the set UC where the Weyl tensor is nonzero.
    Theorems 3.2 and 4.1 are stated on UC or on components where denominators such as 4-B0^2 r^2 are nonzero; this restriction is implicit in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Curvature properties of Melvin magnetic metric." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TMC5UOED

@misc{pith2026190807859,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Curvature properties of Melvin magnetic metric},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TMC5UOED}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.07859}
}
abstract

This paper aims to investigate the curvature restricted geometric properties admitted by Melvin magnetic spacetime metric, a warped product metric with $1$-dimensional fibre. For this, we have considered a Melvin type static, cylindrically symmetric spacetime metric in Weyl form and it is found that such metric, in general, is generalized Roter type, $Ein(3)$ and has pseudosymmetric Weyl conformal tensor satisfying the pseudosymmetric type condition $R\cdot R-Q(S,R)=\mathcal L' Q(g,C)$. The condition for which it satisfies the Roter type condition has been obtained. It is interesting to note that Melvin magnetic metric is pseudosymmetric and pseudosymmetric due to conformal tensor. Moreover such metric is $2$-quasi-Einstien, its Ricci tensor is Reimann compatible and Weyl conformal $2$-forms are recurrent. The Maxwell tensor is also pseudosymmetric type.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

  1. [25]

    Deszcz, R., Plaue, M., Scherfner, M.: On Roter type warped pro ducts with 1- dimensional fibres. J. Geom. Phys. 69 (2013), 1–11

    work page 2013

  2. [15]

    Yau (series ed.), M

    Deszcz, R., G/suppress logowska, M, Hotlo´ s, M and Sawicz, K.,A Survey on Generalized Einstein Metric Conditions, Advances in Lorentzian Geometry, Proceedings of the Lorentzian Geometry Conference in Berlin, AMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics, 49, S.-T. Yau (series ed.), M. Plaue, A.D. Rendall and M. Scherfner (eds.), 2011, 27–46

    work page 2011

  3. [1]

    and Deszcz, R., On totally umbilical submanifolds of some class of Riemanni an manifolds, Demonstratio Math., 16 (1983), 39–59

    Adam´ ow, A. and Deszcz, R., On totally umbilical submanifolds of some class of Riemanni an manifolds, Demonstratio Math., 16 (1983), 39–59

    work page 1983

  4. [2]

    and Murathan,C., On generalized Robertson-Walker space- times satisfying some curvature condition, Turk

    Arslan, K., Deszcz, R., Ezenta¸ s, R., Hotlo´ s, M. and Murathan,C., On generalized Robertson-Walker space- times satisfying some curvature condition, Turk. J. Math., 38(2) (2014), 353–373

    work page 2014

  5. [3]

    Besse, A.L., Einstein Manifolds, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1987

    work page 1987

  6. [4]

    de la Soc

    Cartan, ´E., Sur une classe remaquable d ´espaces de Riemann, I, Bull. de la Soc. Math. de France, 54 (1926), 214–216

    work page 1926

  7. [5]

    (Gauthier Villars, Paris, 1946)

    Cartan, ´E., Le¸ cons sur la G´ eom´ etrie des Espaces de Riemann,2nd edn. (Gauthier Villars, Paris, 1946)

    work page 1946

  8. [6]

    C., On pseudosymmetric manifolds , An

    Chaki, M. C., On pseudosymmetric manifolds , An. S ¸tiint ¸. Univ. Al. I. Cuza Ia¸ si. Mat. (N.S.),33 (1987), 53–58

    work page 1987

Show all 76 references
  1. [7]

    C., On generalized quasi-Einstein manifolds, Publ

    Chaki, M. C., On generalized quasi-Einstein manifolds, Publ. Math. Debrecen, 58 (2001), 683–691

    2001

  2. [8]

    and Sent¨ urk, Z., Generalisations of Robertson-Walker spaces, Ann

    Defever, F., Deszcz, R., Hotlo´ s, M., Kucharski, M. and Sent¨ urk, Z., Generalisations of Robertson-Walker spaces, Ann. Univ. Sci. Budapest, E¨ otv¨ os Sect. Math., 43 (2000), 13–24

    2000

  3. [9]

    Defever, F., Deszcz. R. and Prvanovi´ c, M.,On warped product manifolds satisfying some curvature cond itions of pseudosymmetric type, Bull. Greek Math. Soc. 36 (1994), 43–67

    1994

  4. [10]

    and Vrancken, L., On pseudosymmetric spacetimes, J

    Defever, F., Deszcz, R., Verstraelen, L. and Vrancken, L., On pseudosymmetric spacetimes, J. Math. Phys., 35(11) (1994), 5908–5921

    1994

  5. [11]

    Math., 62 (1991), 103–120

    Deszcz, R., On four-dimensional Reimannian warped product manifolds s atisfying certain pseudo-symmetric curvature conditions, Colloq. Math., 62 (1991), 103–120

    1991

  6. [12]

    Deszcz, R., On pseudosymmetric spaces , Bull. Belg. Math. Soc., Series A, 44 (1992), 1–34

    1992

  7. [13]

    Deszcz, R., On Roter type manifolds, 5-th Conference on Geometry and Topology of Manifolds April 27 - May 3, 2003, Krynica, Poland

    2003

  8. [14]

    and G/suppress logowska, M.,Some examples of nonsemisymmetric Ricci-semisymmetric hy persurfaces, Colloq

    Deszcz, R. and G/suppress logowska, M.,Some examples of nonsemisymmetric Ricci-semisymmetric hy persurfaces, Colloq. Math., 94 (2002), 87–101

    2002

  9. [16]

    and Sent¨ urk, Z.,On certain quasi-Einstein semi-symmetric hyper- surfaces, Ann

    Deszcz, R., G/suppress logowska, M., Hotlo´ s, M. and Sent¨ urk, Z.,On certain quasi-Einstein semi-symmetric hyper- surfaces, Ann. Univ. Sci. Budapest E¨ otv¨ os Sect. Math.,41 (1998), 151–164. CUR V ATURE PROPERTIES OF MEL VIN MAGNETIC METRIC 15

    1998

  10. [17]

    and Zafindratafa, G., On Riemann and Weyl compatible tensors, Publ

    Deszcz, R., G/suppress logowska, M., Je/suppress lowicki, L., Petrovi´ c-Torga˘ sev, M. and Zafindratafa, G., On Riemann and Weyl compatible tensors, Publ. Inst. Math. (Beograd) (N.S.), 94(108) (2013), 111–124

    2013

  11. [18]

    and Zafindratafa, Z.,Curvature properties of some class of warped product manifolds, Int

    Deszcz, R., G/suppress logowska, M., Je/suppress lowicki, J. and Zafindratafa, Z.,Curvature properties of some class of warped product manifolds, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Modern Phys., 13 (2016), 1550135 (36 pages)

    2016

  12. [19]

    Deszcz, R., G/suppress logowska, M., Petrovi´ c-Torga˘ sev, M., and Verstraelen, L., On the Roter type of Chen ideal submanifolds, Results Math., 59 (2011), 401–413

    2011

  13. [20]

    and Verstraelen, L., Curvature properties of some class of minimal hypersurfaces in Euclidean spaces, Filomat,29 (2015), 479–492

    Deszcz, R., G/suppress logowska, M., Petrovi´ c-Torga˘ sev, M. and Verstraelen, L., Curvature properties of some class of minimal hypersurfaces in Euclidean spaces, Filomat,29 (2015), 479–492

    2015

  14. [21]

    and Hotlo´ s, M., n hypersurfaces with type number two in spaces of constant cu rvature, Ann

    Deszcz, R. and Hotlo´ s, M., n hypersurfaces with type number two in spaces of constant cu rvature, Ann. Univ. Sci. Budapest E¨ otv¨ o Sect. Math.,46 (2003), 19–34

    2003

  15. [22]

    and Shaikh, A.A.,Curvature properties of G ¨odel metric, Int J

    Deszcz, R., Hotlo´ s, M., Je/suppress lowicki, J., Kundu, H. and Shaikh, A.A.,Curvature properties of G ¨odel metric, Int J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phy., 11 (2014), Article ID: 1450025, 20 pp and Erratum: Curvature properties of G ¨odel metric, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys., 16...

    2014

  16. [23]

    Deszcz, R., Kowalczyk, D., On some class of pseudosymmetric warped products, Colloq. Math. 97 (2003), 7–22

    2003

  17. [24]

    and Kucharski, M., On curvature properties of certain generalized Robertson- Walker spacetimes, Tsukuba J

    Deszcz, R. and Kucharski, M., On curvature properties of certain generalized Robertson- Walker spacetimes, Tsukuba J. Math., 23(1) (1999), 113–130

    1999

  18. [26]

    G/suppress logowska, M.,Semi-Riemannian manifolds whose Weyl tensor is a Kulkarni- Nomizu square, Publ. Inst. Math. (Beograd) (N.S.), 72(86) (2002), 95–106

    2002

  19. [27]

    G/suppress logowska, M., emphOn Roter type manifolds, in: Pure and Applied Differential Geometry- PADGE 2007, Shaker Verlag, Aachen, 2007, 114–122

    2007

  20. [28]

    Dedicta, 7 (1978), 259–280

    Gray, A., Einstein-like manifolds which are not Einstein, Geom. Dedicta, 7 (1978), 259–280

    1978

  21. [29]

    Griffiths, J. B. and Podolsk´ y, J., Exact space-times in Einsteins general relativity, Cambridge University Press, 2009

    2009

  22. [30]

    and Rund, H., Tensors, differential forms and variational principles, Courier Dover Publica- tions, 1989

    Lovelock, D. and Rund, H., Tensors, differential forms and variational principles, Courier Dover Publica- tions, 1989

    1989

  23. [31]

    and Molinari, L.G., Extended Derdzinski-Shen theorem for curvature tensors, Colloq

    Mantica, C.A. and Molinari, L.G., Extended Derdzinski-Shen theorem for curvature tensors, Colloq. Math., 128 (2012), 16

    2012

  24. [32]

    and Molinari, L.G., Riemann compatible tensors, Colloq

    Mantica, C.A. and Molinari, L.G., Riemann compatible tensors, Colloq. Math., 128 (2012), 197–210

    2012

  25. [33]

    Mantica, C. A. and Suh, Y. J., The closedness of some generalized curvature 2-forms on a Ri emannian manifold I, Publ. Math. Debrecen, 81/3-4 (2012), 313–326

    2012

  26. [34]

    Mantica, C. A. and Suh, Y. J., The closedness of some generalized curvature 2-forms on a Ri emannian manifold II, Publ. Math. Debrecen, 82/1 (2013), 163–182

    2013

  27. [35]

    Mantica, C. A. and Suh, Y. J., Recurrent conformal 2-forms on pseudo-Riemannian manifol ds, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phy., 11(6) (2014), 1450056 (29 pages)

    2014

  28. [36]

    A., Pure magnetic and electric geons, Phys

    Melvin, M. A., Pure magnetic and electric geons, Phys. Lett., 8 (1964), 65–68

    1964

  29. [37]

    A., Dynamics of Cylindrical Electromagnetic Universe, Phys

    Melvin, M. A., Dynamics of Cylindrical Electromagnetic Universe, Phys. Lett., 139 (1965), B225–B243

    1965

  30. [38]

    Prvanovi´ c, M.,On weakly symmetric Riemannian manifolds, Publ. Math. Debrecen, 46(1-2) (1995), 19–25

    1995

  31. [39]

    S., On simply harmonic spaces, J

    Ruse, H. S., On simply harmonic spaces, J. London Math. Soc., 21 (1946), 243–247

    1946

  32. [40]

    S., On simply harmonic kappa spaces of four dimensions, Proc

    Ruse, H. S., On simply harmonic kappa spaces of four dimensions, Proc. London Math. Soc., 50 (1949), 317–329. 16 A. A. SHAIKH, AKRAM ALI, ALI H. ALKHALDI AND D. CHAKRABORTY

    1949

  33. [41]

    S., Three dimensional spaces of recurrent curvature, Proc

    Ruse, H. S., Three dimensional spaces of recurrent curvature, Proc. London Math. Soc., 50 (1949), 438–446

    1949

  34. [42]

    A., On pseudo quasi-Einstein manifolds, Period

    Shaikh, A. A., On pseudo quasi-Einstein manifolds, Period. Math. Hungarica, 59(2) (2009), 119–146

    2009

  35. [43]

    A., Al-Solamy, F

    Shaikh, A. A., Al-Solamy, F. R. and Roy, I., On the existence of a new class of semi-Riemannian manifolds , Math. Sci. (Springer), 7:46 (2013), 1–13

    2013

  36. [44]

    and Binh T.Q., On some class of Riemannian manifolds , Bull

    Shaikh, A.A. and Binh T.Q., On some class of Riemannian manifolds , Bull. Transilvania Univ. 15(50) (2008), 351–362

    2008

  37. [45]

    A., Das, L

    Shaikh, A. A., Das, L. and Chakraborty, D., Curvature properties of Siklos metric, to appear in Diff. Goem.-Dyn. Syst

  38. [46]

    A., Ali, M

    Shaikh, A. A., Ali, M. and Ahsan, Z., Curvature properties of Robinson-Trautman metric , J. Geom., 109(38) (2018), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s000022-018-0443-1

    2018 doi

  39. [47]

    and Kundu, H.,On pseudosymmetric manifolds , Publ

    Shaikh, A.A., Deszcz, R., Hotlo´ s, M., Je/suppress lowicki, J. and Kundu, H.,On pseudosymmetric manifolds , Publ. Math. Debrecen, 86(3-4) (2015), 433–456

    2015

  40. [48]

    Shaikh, A.A., Kundu, H., On weakly symmetric and weakly Ricci symmetric warped produ ct manifolds, Publ. Math. Debrecen 81(34) (2012), 487–505

    2012

  41. [49]

    Shaikh, A. A. and Kundu, H., On equivalency of various geometric structures , J. Geom., 105 (2014), 139–165

    2014

  42. [50]

    Shaikh, A. A. and Kundu, H., On warped product generalized Roter type manifolds , Balkan J. Geom. Appl., 21(2) (2016), 82–95

    2016

  43. [51]

    Shaikh, A. A. and Kundu, H., On generalized Roter type manifolds, Kragujevac J. Math 43(3) (2019), Pages 471–493

    2019

  44. [52]

    and Kundu, H., On some curvature restricted geometric structures for proj ective curvature tensor, Int

    Shaikh, A.A. and Kundu, H., On some curvature restricted geometric structures for proj ective curvature tensor, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Modern Phys., 15(9) (2018), 18501157 (38 pages)

    2018

  45. [53]

    Shaikh, A. A. and Kundu, H., On warped product manifolds satisfying some pseudosymmetr ic type condi- tions, Differ. Geom. Dyn. Syst., 19 (2017), 119–135

    2017

  46. [54]

    and Sen, J., Curvature properties of Vaidya metric , Indian J

    Shaikh, A.A., Kundu, H. and Sen, J., Curvature properties of Vaidya metric , Indian J. Math., 61(1), 2019, 41–59

    2019

  47. [55]

    Shaikh, A. A. and Matsuyama, Y., Curvature properties ofsome 4-dimensional semi-Riemanni an metrics , Kragujevac Journal of Mathematics, 41(2) (2017), 259-278

    2017

  48. [56]

    and Jana S.K., On weakly cyclic Ricci symmetric manifolds , Ann

    Shaikh, A.A. and Jana S.K., On weakly cyclic Ricci symmetric manifolds , Ann. Pol. Math., 89(3) (2006), 139–146

    2006

  49. [57]

    and Hui, S.K., On decomposable quasi-Einstein spaces, Math

    Shaikh, A.A. and Hui, S.K., On decomposable quasi-Einstein spaces, Math. Reports, 13(63) (2011), 89–94

    2011

  50. [58]

    Shaikh, A.A., Hui, S. K. and Yoon, W. Dae, On quasi Einstein Spacetimes , Tsukuba J. Math., 33(2) (2009), 305–326

    2009

  51. [59]

    and Hui, S.K., On Lorentzian quasi-Einstein manifolds , J

    Shaikh, A.A., Kim, Y.H. and Hui, S.K., On Lorentzian quasi-Einstein manifolds , J. Korean Math. Soc., 48 (2011), 669–689, and Erratum to: On Lorentzian quasi-Einstein m anifolds, J. Korean Math. Soc. 48 (2011), 1327–1328

    2011

  52. [60]

    Shaikh, A. A. and Patra, A., On a generalized class of recurrent manifolds , Arch. Math. (BRNO), 46 (2010), 71–78

    2010

  53. [61]

    and Roy, I., On quasi generalized recurrent manifolds, Math

    Shaikh, A.A. and Roy, I., On quasi generalized recurrent manifolds, Math. Pannon., 21(2) (2010), 251–263

    2010

  54. [62]

    Shaikh, A. A. and Roy, I., On weakly generalized recurrent manifolds , Ann. Univ. Sci. Budapest, E¨ otv¨ os Sect. Math., 54 (2011) 35–45

    2011

  55. [63]

    A., Roy, I

    Shaikh, A. A., Roy, I. and Kundu, H., On some generalized recurrent manifolds , Bull. Iranian Math. Soc., 43(5) (2017). CUR V ATURE PROPERTIES OF MEL VIN MAGNETIC METRIC 17

    2017

  56. [64]

    A., Roy, I

    Shaikh, A. A., Roy, I. and Kundu, H., On the existence of a generalized class of recurrent manifol ds, An. S ¸tiint ¸. Univ. Al. I. Cuza Ia¸ si Mat. (N. S.),LXIV(2) (2018), 233–251

    2018

  57. [65]

    A., Srivastava, S

    Shaikh, A. A., Srivastava, S. K. and Chakraborty, D., Curvature properties of anisotropic scale invariant metrics, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys., 16 (2019), 195086 (17 pages)

    2019

  58. [66]

    Sawicz, K., Curvature properties of some class of hypersurfaces in Eucl idean spaces, Publ. Inst. Math. (Beograd) (N.S.) 98(112) (2015), 167–177

    2015

  59. [67]

    J., Kwon, J-H

    Suh, Y. J., Kwon, J-H. and Pyo, Y. S., On semi-Riemannian manifolds satisfying the second Bianch i identity, J. Korean Math. Soc., 40(1) (2003), 129–167

    2003

  60. [68]

    I.,Structure theorems on Riemannian spaces satisfying R(X, Y ) R = 0, I

    Szab´ o, Z. I.,Structure theorems on Riemannian spaces satisfying R(X, Y ) R = 0, I. The local version, J. Diff. Geom., 17 (1982), 531–582

    1982

  61. [69]

    I.,Classification and construction of complete hypersurfaces satisfying R(X, Y ) R = 0, Acta Sci

    Szab´ o, Z. I.,Classification and construction of complete hypersurfaces satisfying R(X, Y ) R = 0, Acta Sci. Math., 47 (1984), 321–348

    1984

  62. [70]

    I.,Structure theorems on Riemannian spaces satisfying R(X, Y ) R = 0, II, The global version, Geom

    Szab´ o, Z. I.,Structure theorems on Riemannian spaces satisfying R(X, Y ) R = 0, II, The global version, Geom. Dedicata, 19 (1985), 65–108

    1985

  63. [71]

    Japan Acad., 50 (1974), 301–302

    Tachibana, S., A Theorem on Riemannian manifolds of positive curvature ope rator, Proc. Japan Acad., 50 (1974), 301–302

    1974

  64. [72]

    and Binh, T.Q.,On weakly symmetric and weakly projective symmetric Rieman nian manifolds, Coll

    T´ amassy, L. and Binh, T.Q.,On weakly symmetric and weakly projective symmetric Rieman nian manifolds, Coll. Math. Soc. J. Bolyai, 50 (1989), 663–670

    1989

  65. [73]

    S., Absolute Stability of Melvin’s Magnetic Universe, Phys

    Thorne, K. S., Absolute Stability of Melvin’s Magnetic Universe, Phys. Rev., 139 (1965), B244–B254

    1965

  66. [74]

    Pure at appl., 30 (1985), 295–305

    Venzi, P., Una generalizzazione degli spazi ricorrenti, Revue Roumaine de Math. Pure at appl., 30 (1985), 295–305

    1985

  67. [75]

    London Math

    Walker, A.G., On Ruses spaces of recurrent curvature, Proc. London Math. Soc., 52 (1950), 36–64

    1950

  68. [76]

    and Kundu, H., On weakly symmetric and weakly Ricci symmetric warped produ ct manifolds, Publ

    Shaikh, A.A. and Kundu, H., On weakly symmetric and weakly Ricci symmetric warped produ ct manifolds, Publ. Math. Debrecen, 48(3-4) (2012), 487–505. 1 Department of Mathematics, University of Burdwan, Golapbag, Burdwan-713104, West Bengal, India E-mail address : aask2003@yahoo...

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.