Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 38 references

HII versus HI in the `green valley' galaxies: direct comparison

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes that in the green-valley galaxy J1237+39, all detected gas—neutral and ionized—is in global counter-rotation with the stellar disc, so the gas was captured from the environment rather than being a remnant of the…

desk verdict New HII-HI comparison finds a likely counter-rotating gas disc in J1237+39, but the result hangs on a single low-resolution stellar velocity measurement that needs verification. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08115 v1 pith:WVR4NEK5 submitted 2019-08-21 astro-ph.GA

Tatiana Bryukhareva , Alexei Moiseev This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords greenvalleygalaxiesearly-typeionizedgaskinematicsHIcounter-rotationAGNfeedbackscanningFabry-Perotinterferometrygalaxyaccretion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tests whether four early-type 'green valley' galaxies are quenching through AGN feedback, as earlier H I data suggested, or whether some of them are acquiring gas from outside. It adds optical spectroscopy of the ionized gas—long-slit data for all four and scanning Fabry-Perot Hα velocity fields for the two with detectable discs—and compares the H II kinematics with the published H I maps and with stellar rotation. The result splits the sample: the two reddest galaxies show no ionized gas in their discs, while the two bluer ones host rotating H II discs. The central claim is that in J1237+39 the entire gaseous disc, in both H I and H II, rotates opposite to the stars, meaning the gas was accreted or captured in a minor merger rather than expelled. If right, this shows that green-valley colours do not always mark a simple one-way transition from star-forming to passive.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing comparison is between three velocity fields: neutral gas from H I radio mapping, ionized gas from scanning Fabry-Perot observations of Hα, and stars from absorption-line template fitting. The scanning Fabry-Perot data provide roughly an order of magnitude better angular resolution than the 21-cm maps, which is what allows the paper to see the nuclear outflow in J1117+51, the inner non-circular streaming in J1237+39, and the sign of the global rotation. A tilted-ring model extracts rotation curves and residual velocity maps from the Hα fields, and BPT diagnostic diagrams classify the excitation mechanism as star-forming, composite, or LINER/AGN.

What would settle it

Obtain a full integral-field stellar-velocity map of J1237+39 with high signal-to-noise absorption-line fits: if the stellar rotation along the major axis has the same sign as the H I and H II velocities, the global counter-rotation claim is refuted. Alternatively, map the gas metallicity across the disc, since the cold-accretion scenario predicts a sharp metallicity boundary and a smooth gradient would undermine it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is the global gas-star counter-rotation in J1237+39. The Hα velocity field from the scanning Fabry-Perot observations and the earlier WSRT H I maps agree in detail, and both show the gas rotating in the opposite direction from the stellar disc along the major axis, over a gaseous disc larger than the stellar disc. The authors therefore conclude that all observed gas in this system was captured from the environment, through accretion or minor merging, and that the galaxy may be on its way to a new starburst rather than further quenching. In the rest of the sample, the ionized gas mirrors the H I status: it is absent outside the circumnuclear regions in the two galaxies whose H I reservoirs were classified as ejected, and it co-rotates with the stars in J1117+51, where the only AGN signature is a central outflow and LINER-type excitation.

Load-bearing premise

The counter-rotation conclusion rests on the sign of the stellar rotation, which comes from fitting stellar-population templates to absorption spectra along a single major-axis slit; a systematic template bias or a slit not exactly on the major axis could flip the stellar rotation sign and invalidate the result.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In J0836+30 and J0900+46, the absence of ionized gas outside the nuclei is consistent with the H I picture in which the reservoirs were ejected or heated beyond detectability.
  • In J1117+51, the AGN affects only the central region, so large-scale AGN feedback is not the cause of the gas distribution in this source.
  • J1237+39 would have been classified as an early quenching stage from H I alone, but the counter-rotating gas shows it is actually accreting, so H I morphology by itself cannot clock the green-valley transition.
  • Gas acquired by accretion or minor merging can form a large, regularly rotating, counter-rotating disc that may trigger a new episode of star formation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same gas-star rotation test could be applied systematically to integral-field surveys; if counter-rotating gas is common in green-valley early-type galaxies, the 'green valley' is an overlay of quenching and accretion paths, not a single transition.
  • Deep imaging or stellar-population mapping of the red knot and one-armed red spiral in J1237+39 would directly test the minor-merger interpretation proposed here.
  • A gas-phase metallicity map of the counter-rotating disc would distinguish minor merging from filamentary accretion: the accretion scenario predicts a sharp metallicity boundary between the counter-rotating gas and the galaxy's own gas.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents long-slit and scanning Fabry-Perot observations of four green-valley early-type galaxies from Wong et al. (2015), comparing the ionized-gas morphology and kinematics with the existing WSRT HI maps and with stellar kinematics derived from ULySS full-spectrum fitting. In J0836+30 and J0900+46, no extended ionized gas is detected, consistent with the previously reported expelled HI reservoirs. In J1117+51 and J1237+39, rotating HII discs are detected; J1117+51 shows co-rotating gas and a nuclear blueshifted outflow, whereas J1237+39 is claimed to host a global HI+HII disc counter-rotating relative to the stellar disc, which the authors interpret as evidence that all of its gas was captured from the environment. The paper concludes that HI morphology alone is not a sufficient quenching-stage indicator and that higher-resolution IFU data are needed.

Significance. If the counter-rotation result for J1237+39 holds, it is a valuable and relatively rare case linking the green-valley quenching sequence to external gas acquisition, and it demonstrates the advantage of order-of-magnitude higher angular resolution in HII velocity fields compared with the 12-30 arcsec WSRT HI data. The paper is a direct observational comparison rather than a model-derived argument: the gas kinematics come from independent H-alpha FPI mapping, the tilted-ring analysis is standard, and the authors are explicit about the degeneracy between minor merging and filamentary accretion. However, the headline claim depends on a single low-resolution long-slit stellar absorption measurement whose sign is not documented with error bars or template-systematics tests, and the morphological supporting evidence is admittedly preliminary. The paper would be a solid contribution after that load-bearing point is quantitatively supported.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 2.1, Fig. 3] The counter-rotation claim for J1237+39 is the paper's headline result, but it rests on the sign of the stellar line-of-sight velocity gradient measured from ULySS fits to δλ ≈ 5 Å (FWHM ≈ 230 km/s) long-slit spectra. Fig. 3 shows no error bars for the stellar velocities, and the text reports no systematic tests of the ULySS fits, such as comparisons of the Elodie and Vaz Miles libraries, sensitivity to continuum/emission-line masking, or an independent cross-correlation check. At this spectral resolution a template mismatch can plausibly bias a small stellar gradient, and the H-alpha velocity field alone cannot determine the stellar rotation direction. I request that the authors display error bars on all stellar velocity points, compare stellar velocities derived with both libraries and with an independent method, and state the minimum stellar velocity gradient that would be robustly detected. Without such checks, the global HI+HII counter-rotation conclusion is not fully supported.
  2. [Abstract vs Sec. 4] The abstract states as a firm conclusion that all of the observed gas in J1237+39 was captured from the environment via accretion or minor merging, whereas Sec. 4 explicitly says the available data are not enough to make a confident choice between minor merging and filamentary accretion, and Sec. 3.1 labels the supporting color-index structures as very preliminary. The wording of the abstract and Conclusion (iv) should be aligned with the body's more hedged interpretation unless additional evidence, such as metallicity maps or an independent stellar kinematic map, is provided.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 3.2] The text contains the unrendered string '???maximum starburst line???'; this should read 'maximum starburst line' with the Kewley et al. (2001) reference.
  2. [Sec. 5 and Sec. 4] Conclusion (ii) contains the typo 'rotats' ('rotates'), and Sec. 4 contains 'dymanically cold discs' ('dynamically cold discs').
  3. [Table 3 and Fig. 5] No uncertainties are given for the circular rotation velocities Vrot; adding them, or at least stating their typical scatter, would allow the reader to judge the radial stability of the fitted rotation curves.
  4. [Sec. 3.1] The photometric inclination is fixed by adopting an intrinsic axial ratio q0=0.2; the sensitivity of PAkin and Vrot to this assumption is not discussed, even though the sign of the rotation is not affected.
  5. [Sec. 2.1] The stellar library name 'Vaz Miles' should be checked and cited properly (likely Vazdekis/MILES), and the exact ULySS configuration used for the fits should be described so the kinematic measurements are reproducible.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the counter-rotation claim is a direct comparison of independently measured stellar and gas velocities; the quoted conclusion is an interpretation, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is observational rather than model-derived. Stellar line-of-sight velocities are obtained from ULySS fits to absorption spectra (Sec. 2.1), while ionized-gas velocities come from Gaussian/Voigt fits to emission lines (Sec. 2.1 and 2.2). These measurements are independent, and the counter-rotation in J1237+39 is read directly from the velocity curves in Fig. 3. The tilted-ring model described in Sec. 3.1 is fitted to the gas velocity fields to derive kinematic position angles, inclinations, and rotation curves; it does not assume or inject the gas-star counter-rotation, and the conclusion does not feed back into the fit. The H-alpha velocity fields are also independently compared with the external WSRT HI data of Wong et al. (2015), providing agreement on the gas rotation sense. The paper's self-citations (Afanasiev & Moiseev 2011; Moiseev & Egorov 2008; Moiseev 2014, 2015; Finkelman et al. 2011) concern data-reduction and tilted-ring software and are methodological, not load-bearing for the scientific claim. The possible sensitivity of the stellar rotation sign to template mismatch is a measurement systematic, not a circularity: nothing in the paper's stated assumptions or equations makes the stellar velocity equal to the gas velocity by construction. Therefore the paper is self-contained with respect to the counter-rotation inference, and no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This observational paper has no invented entities. The central claim rests on standard kinematic modeling assumptions and on distances and HI properties taken from Wong et al. (2015). The tilted-ring parameters (PA, inclination, Vsys, Vrot) are fitted to the H-alpha velocity fields; they describe the data rather than being free parameters in a theoretical derivation. The main assumptions that could affect the conclusion are the circular-orbit model for the rotating disc, the ULySS stellar template fitting, and the photometric inclination estimate.

free parameters (4)
  • Photometric inclination i0 = J1117+51: 43 deg, J1237+39: 34 deg
    Adopted from r-band isophotes assuming intrinsic thickness q0=0.2 for spiral discs (Sec. 3.1); not fitted to kinematics, but enters the tilted-ring decomposition.
  • Kinematic position angle PA0_kin = J1117+51: 151 deg, J1237+39: 337 deg
    Fitted to the H-alpha velocity field in the tilted-ring model (Table 3); the gas-star comparison uses this PA versus the photometric PA of the stellar disc.
  • Systemic velocity Vsys = J1117+51: 8240 km/s, J1237+39: 6095 km/s
    Fixed at the optimum value during the tilted-ring fit (Sec. 3.1); used to produce residual velocity maps and to compare with HI velocities.
  • Circular rotation velocity Vrot(r) = Flat rotation curves (Fig. 5, bottom)
    Fitted per elliptical ring; the residuals define the non-circular motions discussed in Sec. 3.1.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The gas in the discs moves on circular orbits in a thin inclined plane (tilted-ring model)
    Invoked in Sec. 3.1 to decompose the velocity fields; all non-circular motions are treated as residuals. This is the standard assumption for disc kinematics.
  • domain assumption The ULySS stellar template fits provide unbiased stellar line-of-sight velocities
    Used in Sec. 2.1 and Fig. 3 to measure stellar rotation; a template mismatch could bias the derived stellar velocities and affect the counter-rotation conclusion.
  • domain assumption Distances, stellar masses, and HI properties are taken from Wong et al. (2015)
    Table 1 adopts distances and HI parameters from Wong et al. 2015; physical size scales (kpc) of the gaseous discs depend on these distances.
  • standard math BPT diagnostics classify gas excitation using Kewley et al. (2001) and Kauffmann et al. (2003) curves
    Used in Sec. 3.2 to separate LINER, composite, and H II excitation; reliance on standard photoionization models.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of HII versus HI in the `green valley' galaxies: direct comparison." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WVR4NEK5

@misc{pith2026190808115,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: HII versus HI in the `green valley' galaxies: direct comparison},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WVR4NEK5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08115}
}
read the original abstract

We study the morphology and kinematics of the ionization state of the gas in four 'green valley' early-type galaxies at different stages of their transition from a 'blue cloud' of star-forming galaxies to the sequence of passive evolution. The previous HI mapping of the considered sample reveals a spatial offset between the cold gas reservoirs and stellar discs depending on the post-starburst age. Consideration of the ionized-gas properties is essential to understand the role of various feedback processes in star formation quenching. We performed long-slit and 3D optical spectroscopic observations at the 6-m Russian telescope and compared the gas and stellar kinematics. Spatial distribution of the ionized gas is in agreement with HI maps; however, the one-order higher angular resolution in the HII velocity fields allows us to study non-circular gas motions in detail, like the AGN-driven outflow in the nucleus of J1117+51. The most intriguing result is the global HI+HII gas counter-rotation relative to the stellar disc in J1237+39. Therefore, in this case all the observed gas in the 'green valley' galaxy was captured from the environment via accretion or minor merging.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08115 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. SDSS DR13 images of the observed galaxies. Position of the SCORPIO-2 spectrograph slit is shown in green. The cyan contours mark the external borders of the H i structures observed with WSRT (Wong et al. 2015). 3.1 Ionized gas kinematics and morphology Radial distributions of the line-of-sight velocities of the stel￾lar and gaseous components along the photometric major axes in J1117+51 and J1237+39 are shown in [P… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. SCORPIO-2 spectra of the sample galaxies ±3 arcsec integrated around the nucleus (black), the ULySS modelled spectra (yellow), and the residual nebular spectrum (red). Top row: J0836+30 and J0900+46. Bottom row: J1117+51 and J1237+39 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Line-of-sight velocities of the stars (blue) and of the ionized gas in the Hα (red) and [N ii]λ6548, 6583 emission lines (green) along the slits in J1117+51 (left) and J1237+39 (right). galaxies matches the position of the photometric nucleus very well. In each ring, the observed distribution of the line￾of-sight velocities was described with the circular rotation model parameterized by the position angle of the kin… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FPI maps in the Hα emission line for J1117+51 (top row) and J1237+39 (bottom row). From left to right: the monochromatic images in the logarithmic scale, the line-of-sight velocity field, the maps of residual velocities (observed minus tilted-ring model) and velocity d…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Radial variations of the tilted-ring model and r-band isophote parameters: the position angle (top), the ellipcity (middle), and the circular rotation velocity (bottom). The P A of isophotes in r-band SDSS image is shown with red dots, H ii kinematics – blue dots. Left…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The SDSS map of the (g − r) colour index in the galaxy J1237+39. Isophotes of the r-SDSS image are overlapped. tional arguments in favour of minor-merging hypothesis. It is possible that we directly observe a remnant of the disturbed dwarf companion. New integral-field…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: J1117+51 diagnostic diagrams of [O iii]5007/Hβ versus [N ii]/Hα (left-hand panel) and [S ii]/Hα (right-hand panel). Lines of separating pure H ii regions from AGN/shocks and composite excitation mechanisms: the dashed line is the (Kewley et al. 2001) curve, the solid l…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: J1237+39 diagnostic diagram of [O iii]5007/Hβ versus [N ii]/Hα (left-hand panel) and [S ii]/Hα (right-hand panel). Separating lines are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

  2. [2]

    L., Moiseev A

    Afanasiev V. L., Moiseev A. V., 2011, Baltic Astronomy, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011BaltA..20..363A 20, 363

    2011

  3. [3]

    K., Glazebrook K., Brinkmann J., Ivezi \'c Z ., Lupton R

    Baldry I. K., Glazebrook K., Brinkmann J., Ivezi \'c Z ., Lupton R. H., Nichol R. C., Szalay A. S., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/380092 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...600..681B 600, 681

    doi:10.1086/380092 2004

  4. [5]

    A., Phillips M

    Baldwin J. A., Phillips M. M., Terlevich R., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/130766 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981PASP...93....5B 93, 5

    doi:10.1086/130766 1981

  5. [6]

    G., 1989, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989A

    Begeman K. G., 1989, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989A

    work page 1989

  6. [7]

    R., Moustakas J., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101734 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ARA

    Blanton M. R., Moustakas J., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101734 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ARA

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101734 2009

  7. [8]

    Dickey C., Geha M., Wetzel A., El-Badry K., 2019, arXiv e-prints, http://ads.inasan.ru/abs/2019arXiv190201401D

    work page 2019

  8. [9]

    V., Lozinskaya T

    Egorov O. V., Lozinskaya T. A., Moiseev A. V., Smirnov-Pinchukov G. V., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1158 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.478.3386E 478, 3386

    doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1158 2018

Show all 38 references
  1. [10]

    S., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312169 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...521L..37E 521, L37

    Erwin P., Sparke L. S., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312169 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...521L..37E 521, L37

    1999 doi

  2. [11]

    M., Couch W

    Fasano G., Poggianti B. M., Couch W. J., Bettoni D., Kj rgaard P., Moles M., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/317047 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...542..673F 542, 673

    2000 doi

  3. [12]

    Finkelman I., Moiseev A., Brosch N., Katkov I., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19601.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.418.1834F 418, 1834

    2011

  4. [13]

    J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13071.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.386..935F 386, 935

    Fraternali F., Binney J. J., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13071.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.386..935F 386, 935

    2008

  5. [14]

    P., 1926, @doi [ ] 10.1086/143018 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1926ApJ....64..321H 64, 321

    Hubble E. P., 1926, @doi [ ] 10.1086/143018 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1926ApJ....64..321H 64, 321

    1926 doi

  6. [15]

    Jin Y., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2055 , http://ads.inasan.ru/abs/2016MNRAS.463..913J 463, 913

    2016 doi

  7. [16]

    Y., Kniazev A

    Katkov I. Y., Kniazev A. Y., Sil'chenko O. K., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256/150/1/24 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AJ....150...24K 150, 24

    2015 doi

  8. [17]

    Kauffmann G., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.346.1055K 346, 1055

    2003

  9. [18]

    J., Dopita M

    Kewley L. J., Dopita M. A., Sutherland R. S., Heisler C. A., Trevena J., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321545 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...556..121K 556, 121

    2001 doi

  10. [19]

    J., Groves B., Kauffmann G., Heckman T., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.372..961K 372, 961

    Kewley L. J., Groves B., Kauffmann G., Heckman T., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.372..961K 372, 961

    2006

  11. [20]

    Koleva M., Prugniel P., Bouchard A., Wu Y., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200811467 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A

    2009 doi

  12. [21]

    C., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/516639 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..173..342M 173, 342

    Martin D. C., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/516639 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJS..173..342M 173, 342

    2007 doi

  13. [22]

    L., et al., 2019, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190105579M p

    Masters K. L., et al., 2019, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190105579M p. arXiv:1901.05579

    2019 arXiv

  14. [23]

    V., 2014, @doi [Astrophysical Bulletin] 10.1134/S1990341314010015 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AstBu..69....1M 69, 1

    Moiseev A. V., 2014, @doi [Astrophysical Bulletin] 10.1134/S1990341314010015 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AstBu..69....1M 69, 1

    2014 doi

  15. [24]

    V., 2015, @doi [Astrophysical Bulletin] 10.1134/S1990341315040112 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AstBu..70..494M 70, 494

    Moiseev A. V., 2015, @doi [Astrophysical Bulletin] 10.1134/S1990341315040112 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015AstBu..70..494M 70, 494

    2015 doi

  16. [25]

    V., Egorov O

    Moiseev A. V., Egorov O. V., 2008, @doi [Astrophysical Bulletin] 10.1134/S1990341308020089 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008AstBu..63..181M 63, 181

    2008 doi

  17. [26]

    V., Vald \'e s J

    Moiseev A. V., Vald \'e s J. R., Chavushyan V. H., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20040045 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004A

    2004 doi

  18. [27]

    Naab T., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1919 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.444.3357N 444, 3357

    2014 doi

  19. [28]

    M., Dalla Bont \`a E., Fabricius M., Saglia R

    Pizzella A., Morelli L., Coccato L., Corsini E. M., Dalla Bont \`a E., Fabricius M., Saglia R. P., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731712 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    2018 doi

  20. [29]

    Querejeta M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526354 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...579L...2Q 579, L2

    2015 doi

  21. [31]

    K., Moiseev A

    Sil'chenko O. K., Moiseev A. V., Afanasiev V. L., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/694/2/1550 , http://ads.inasan.ru/abs/2009ApJ...694.1550S 694, 1550

    2009 doi

  22. [32]

    K., Proshina I

    Sil'chenko O. K., Proshina I. S., Shulga A. P., Koposov S. E., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21990.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.427..790S 427, 790

    2012

  23. [33]

    K., Moiseev A

    Sil'chenko O. K., Moiseev A. V., Egorov O. V., 2019, , in press, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190707261S p. arXiv:1907.07261

    2019 arXiv

  24. [34]

    Strateva I., et al., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/323301 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001AJ....122.1861S 122, 1861

    2001 doi

  25. [35]

    C., Aceves H., Rodr \' guez-P \'e rez C., Borlaff A., Querejeta M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628821 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...604A.105T 604, A105

    Tapia T., Eliche-Moral M. C., Aceves H., Rodr \' guez-P \'e rez C., Borlaff A., Querejeta M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628821 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...604A.105T 604, A105

    2017 doi

  26. [36]

    Taylor P., Federrath C., Kobayashi C., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1439 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479..141T 479, 141

    2018 doi

  27. [37]

    Taylor P., Kobayashi C., Federrath C., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz630 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.485.3215T 485, 3215

    2019 doi

  28. [38]

    V., van de Ven G., Moster B

    Tsatsi A., Macci \`o A. V., van de Ven G., Moster B. P., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/802/1/L3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...802L...3T 802, L3

    2015 doi

  29. [39]

    J., Oemler A

    Wilman D. J., Oemler A. J., Mulchaey J. S., McGee S. L., Balogh M. L., Bower R. G., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/692/1/298 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJ...692..298W 692, 298

    2009 doi

  30. [40]

    I., Schawinski K., J \'o zsa G

    Wong O. I., Schawinski K., J \'o zsa G. I. G., Urry C. M., Lintott C. J., Simmons B. D., Kaviraj S., Masters K. L., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu2724 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.447.3311W 447, 3311

    2015 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.