A short observational view of black hole X-ray binaries with INTEGRAL

V. Grinberg

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 35 references

A short observational view of black hole X-ray binaries with INTEGRAL

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review argues that INTEGRAL's high-energy coverage, long uninterrupted monitoring, and hard X-ray polarimetry give it unique access to black hole X-ray binaries, with the polarized Cygnus X-1 hard tail as the flagship result.

desk verdict A competent and useful INTEGRAL synthesis with no new science, but two overstatements—an overbroad 'unique' polarimetry claim and reporting a ~2σ polarisation detection as significant—that a referee should have caught. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08265 v1 pith:BRUWMQ4K submitted 2019-08-22 astro-ph.HE

V. Grinberg This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.HE

keywords blackholeX-raybinariesINTEGRALhardpolarizationtailpositronannihilationlineaccretionandejectionflowsmicroquasarsstatetransitions

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This short review argues that the INTEGRAL mission has made not only major but also unique contributions to the study of black hole X-ray binaries. Its case rests on three capabilities no other past, current, or approved mission combines: spectral coverage above the roughly 100–400 keV exponential cutoff, long almost uninterrupted monitoring, and hard X-ray/soft gamma-ray polarization. On this evidence the paper points to a $67\pm30\%$ polarization of the Cygnus X-1 hard tail above 400 keV as a sign of jet emission, to the 511 keV line in the 2015 V404 Cyg outburst as a positron-annihilation signature, and to state transitions traced through complete outbursts. A sympathetic reader takes away the claim that direct high-energy observation is the avenue that breaks model degeneracies which soft X-ray spectroscopy alone leaves unresolved.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the combined use of the two hard X-ray instruments on INTEGRAL: IBIS, a coded-mask imager that provides the 20 keV to 2 MeV images and spectra, and SPI, a spectrometer that gives independent spectra, timing up to 130 keV, and sensitivity to the 511 keV line. Their secondary role as polarimeters is the decisive mechanism: comparing counts registered in the detector plane at different orientations yields the polarization fraction and angle, and for Cygnus X-1 the measured result separates a weakly polarized cutoff power law below 400 keV from a strongly polarized hard tail above it. Long uninterrupted monitoring supplies the temporal context that places each snapshot, flare, or spectral state inside the overall outburst evolution.

What would settle it

A concrete test: re-derive the Cygnus X-1 polarization from the 2003–2012 IBIS and SPI event lists using a background model built from source-free pointings at the same sky position; if the modulation that gives $67\pm30\%$ above 400 keV disappears, the jet-polarization claim is false. For the 511 keV line, compare SPI flare-time spectra with empty-field observations over the same orbital phases; a residual matching the V404 Cyg flare times would mark the feature as instrumental.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that INTEGRAL's observing niche—broad-band coverage reaching above the spectral cutoff, long uninterrupted campaigns, fast SPI timing, and the unusual use of its IBIS imager and SPI spectrometer as polarimeters—yields information about black hole X-ray binaries that cannot be obtained with any other current or planned mission. The flagship result is the spectral decomposition of Cygnus X-1 into an unpolarized cutoff power law below 400 keV and a hard tail above 400 keV polarized at $67\pm30\%$, interpreted as evidence that the tail comes from the jet rather than the Comptonizing corona. The paper also treats the 511 keV feature seen in V404 Cyg during its 2015 outburst as a real positron-annihilation detection, making that source the third microquasar with such evidence, while acknowledging that the detection has been critiqued. From these threads it concludes that INTEGRAL is uniquely placed to study the high-energy parts of accretion and ejection flows.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that INTEGRAL's IBIS and SPI, which were not designed as polarimeters, produce trustworthy polarization and line measurements after background subtraction; if systematics in the 20 keV to 2 MeV background create the $67\pm30\%$ Cygnus X-1 signal or the V404 Cyg 511 keV feature, the paper's uniqueness claims lose much of their force.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The $67\pm30\%$ polarization of the Cygnus X-1 hard tail, if correct, means that the emission above 400 keV is produced by an ordered, non-thermal component such as a jet, while the corona dominates below 400 keV.
Because planned X-ray polarimeters stop near 200 keV, INTEGRAL remains the only polarimetric probe of the region at and above the spectral cutoff.
Long nearly uninterrupted observations of outbursts such as MAXI J1820+070 and MAXI J1348−638 allow state transitions to be caught and placed in context, something short snapshots from other missions cannot do.
The 511 keV detection in V404 Cyg, if confirmed against the background critique, would establish a third microquasar with evidence for positron production and tie the feature to flaring activity.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

As an editorial extension, the full 2003–2018 joint IBIS and SPI archive could be re-analyzed with phase-resolved polarimetry of Cygnus X-1: a stable high polarization fraction across orbital phase would strengthen the jet interpretation, while a phase-dependent or instrumentally variable signal would point to background systematics.
The same polarimetric method should be applied to other persistent and bright transient black hole binaries; V404 Cyg shows it is possible, and a small survey would test whether a polarized hard tail is a general property of the hard state rather than a peculiarity of Cygnus X-1.
If the polarization result survives scrutiny, it implies a design target for future missions: a dedicated polarimeter operating above 200 keV would have a clear scientific payoff for jet and corona geometry, even though current mission plans stop short of that energy.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this is a conference proceedings review, not a research paper. It does a good job summarizing INTEGRAL's niche—long monitoring, high-energy coverage above the cutoff, and hard X-ray/soft gamma-ray polarimetry—and it is honest about controversies like the V404 Cyg 511 keV line. No new numbers, no new models, so 'is_new_result' is correctly false. But as a review it deserves a serious referee, mostly to correct a couple of overstatements.

What it does well: the structure is clear, the cited results are recognizable and accurate to the originals, and the author is upfront about the limitations of the 511 keV detection and the difficulty of the polarimetry. The self-citations are background references, nothing load-bearing.

The soft spots: first, the uniqueness claim in the Introduction and §2.6. 'IBIS and SPI are unique' as polarimeters above 200 keV is not true in the strict sense: AstroSat CZTI operates in 100–380 keV, has demonstrated polarimetric capability, and has published polarization measurements of bright sources, including Cygnus X-1. The author might mean a unique combination of capabilities, but that is not what the text says. Second, the Laurent et al. 67±30% polarization fraction for the Cyg X-1 hard tail is reported as 'significantly polarized.' That is a 2-sigma result, and the review doesn't flag the marginal significance. It says the measurements are challenging, which is good, but a reader will walk away thinking the hard-tail polarization is established when it is really a tentative detection. The review could also acknowledge that CZTI exists as a cross-check; that would make the 'unique' claim more precise.

There is also a small issue with the 'unique among any past, current, and currently approved missions' phrasing. That is a strong claim, and reviews should avoid it unless they have done a systematic survey. It would be easy to fix.

Who is this for: students or newcomers who want a quick entry point into INTEGRAL's role in BH-XRB research. It is not a milestone, but it is a useful reference. I would not cite it in my own work—I would cite the primary papers—but I might assign it to a student as an orientation.

Bottom line: the synthesis holds up, and the flaws are minor overstatements, not load-bearing. A referee should ask for a revision of the uniqueness and significance language. I would not desk reject it. It deserves peer review, though the bar for a conference proceedings review is not high.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. This short conference-proceedings review summarizes selected contributions of INTEGRAL to the study of black hole X-ray binaries. The author argues that INTEGRAL has made unique contributions through long quasi-uninterrupted monitoring campaigns of state transitions and outbursts, direct spectral coverage of the high-energy cutoff and of hard tails above it, hard X-ray timing, detection of a possible 511 keV positron-annihilation feature in V404 Cyg, and hard X-ray/soft gamma-ray polarization measurements of Cygnus X-1. No new data or spectral fits are presented; the article is a narrative review with a reference list. It openly discloses the controversy surrounding the 511 keV detection and repeatedly notes where measurements are challenging or incomplete.

Significance. If its factual claims are correct, the paper is a useful, concise synthesis of how INTEGRAL's design, especially its wide field of view, scheduling flexibility, and coverage above 200 keV, has advanced black hole X-ray binary science beyond what soft X-ray missions can offer. The paper is honest about limitations: it notes that hard-tail properties are not yet coherently understood, that the polarization measurements are challenging, and that the 511 keV detection has been criticized by Roques & Jourdain. Its value is primarily as an accurate and readable entry point to the literature, not as a source of new quantitative results. The main weakness is the repeated assertion that INTEGRAL's capabilities are unique among all past, current, and approved missions; this is too broad in the polarization domain and should be qualified. Because the paper contains no new derivation or model fitting, there are no internal circularity issues, and soundness is essentially a matter of fidelity to the cited literature.

major comments (2)

[§1 and §2.6] Section 1 states that INTEGRAL's capabilities are "unique among any past, current, and currently approved missions," and §2.6 repeats the claim for IBIS/SPI as the only instruments usable as polarimeters above 200 keV. This is too strong as written: AstroSat's CZTI (launched 2015, operating in the 100–380 keV band) is a coded-mask instrument with a demonstrated hard X-ray polarimetric capability and published polarization results for bright sources. INTEGRAL is therefore not the only currently operating mission that can measure polarization at and above the typical spectral cutoff of BH-XRBs. The uniqueness claim should be qualified to the specific >200 keV band and to INTEGRAL's particular combination of sensitivity, field of view, and monitoring schedule, with the relevant AstroSat/CZTI references added.
[§2.6] The review presents the 67 ± 30% polarization fraction of the Cygnus X-1 hard tail as a secure measurement ("significantly polarized" and "independently confirmed"), but at 67 ± 30% the detection is only about 2.2σ from zero, and IBIS and SPI were not designed as polarimeters. Because this measurement is one of the three pillars of the Summary's "unique contributions" claim, the text should state the statistical significance explicitly and describe the main systematic uncertainties (background subtraction, instrumental modulation) rather than merely calling the measurements "challenging." This would not remove the result from the review, but it would put it in proper context.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract] The phrase "some of the INTEGRAL's unique contributions" should read "some of INTEGRAL's unique contributions."
[§2.5] There are two typos: "that the the authors" should read "that the authors," and "space-born mission" should read "space-borne mission."
[§2.6] The sentence "INTEGRAL's IBIS and SPI are unique in that that can be used as polarimeters" contains a duplicated "that." Also, after the uniqueness claim is qualified in the main text, a citation to the AstroSat CZTI polarimetry papers should be added for comparability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review's claims rest on independent observations and mission-capability statements, not on self-referential derivations.

full rationale

This paper is a review article summarizing INTEGRAL contributions to black hole X-ray binary research. It contains no model-fitting, no parameter estimation, and no derivation chain whose output could reduce to its input. The load-bearing scientific results — the Cygnus X-1 hard-tail polarization measurement (Laurent et al. 2011, confirmed by Jourdain et al. 2012), the 511 keV feature in V404 Cyg (Siegert et al. 2016), and the hard-tail detections (Droulans et al. 2010; Zdziarski et al. 2012; Rodriguez et al. 2015b) — are attributed to independent groups, so the review is not asserting these as the author's own derived predictions. The central claim, that INTEGRAL provides unique high-energy coverage, long monitoring, and hard X-ray/soft gamma-ray polarization capability, is a factual statement about mission instrumentation and observing strategy rather than a result derived from the same data it is used to explain. The author's self-citations (Grinberg et al. 2011, 2013, 2014; Garcia et al. 2016 including Grinberg) support only background points, such as the energy dependence of soft-state variability and calibration-related caveats for coded-mask timing, and none of these citations supplies the premise for the uniqueness claim. No equation is used to fit a quantity and then re-present it as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem is imported from the author's prior work. Whether the 'unique' mission-capability claim is fully accurate in light of other instruments is a correctness or completeness question, not a circularity question; under the stated review rules, such external factual concerns do not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no free parameters or invented entities. Its arguments rest on four domain assumptions: the BH-XRB/AGN analogy, the standard Comptonization interpretation of hard-state spectra, the reliability of INTEGRAL as a polarimeter, and the reality of the contested 511 keV detection. All are assumptions drawn from the cited literature rather than from this paper's own evidence.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Black hole X-ray binaries are analogous to AGN; variability timescales scale with mass, so BH-XRBs are 'quasars for the impatient.'
This analogy is stated in the Abstract and Introduction and motivates the broader relevance of BH-XRB results; it is a field-standard assumption, not established in this paper.
domain assumption The hard state spectrum above ~2 keV is dominated by a power law with photon index ~1.7 and an exponential cutoff at ~100-400 keV, produced by thermal Comptonization of disk photons.
The review adopts this widely used spectral decomposition (Introduction, paragraph 3) to argue that INTEGRAL's high-energy coverage is crucial; the interpretation is model-dependent.
domain assumption INTEGRAL/IBIS and SPI can serve as reliable polarimeters at 20 keV-2 MeV, and the reported polarization measurements of Cygnus X-1 (67±30%) are valid.
Section 2.6 relies on this for the jet-origin conclusion, while acknowledging the measurements are challenging; the instruments were not designed for polarimetry.
domain assumption The detection of a 511 keV positron annihilation feature in V404 Cyg by Siegert et al. (2016) is real, with the critique by Roques & Jourdain (2016, 2019) adequately addressed.
Section 2.5 uses this to identify V404 Cyg as the third microquasar with a possible annihilation feature; the paper itself notes the dispute, so the assumption carries residual risk.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A short observational view of black hole X-ray binaries with INTEGRAL." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BRUWMQ4K

@misc{pith2026190808265,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A short observational view of black hole X-ray binaries with INTEGRAL},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BRUWMQ4K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08265}
}

abstract

Accreting black holes are unique tools to understand the physics under extreme gravity. While black hole X-ray binaries differ vastly in mass from AGN, their accretion and ejection flows are assumed to be essentially similar. Black hole X-ray binaries or microquasars are, however, quasars for the impatient as variability timescales scale directly with mass. State changes, i.e., strong variations in emission properties, in black hole X-ray binaries can happen within hours and whole outburst cycles within months to years. But our understanding of the drivers of such changes and the contributions of individual accretion and ejection components to the overall emission is still lacking. Here, I highlight some of the INTEGRAL's unique contributions to the understanding of black hole X-ray binaries through its coverage of the energies above the spectral cutoff, its long uninterrupted monitoring observations and the measurements of hard X-ray / soft $\gamma$-ray polarization.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

[1]

2011, ApJ, 739, 58 Grinberg: Black hole XRBs with INTEGRAL 5

Cabanac, C., Roques, J.-P ., & Jourdain, E. 2011, ApJ, 739, 58 Grinberg: Black hole XRBs with INTEGRAL 5

work page 2011
[2]

2019b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1904.09112 Del Santo, M

Cangemi, F., Beuchert, T., Siegert, T., et al. 2019b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1904.09112 Del Santo, M. 2012, in Journal of Physics Conference Series, V ol. 354, Journal of Physics Conference Series, 012003 Del Santo, M., Belloni, T. M., Tomsick, J. A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 3585 Del Santo, M., Malzac, J., Belmont, R., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 209

arXiv 1904
[3]

Begelman, M. C. 1997, ApJ, 487, 759

1997
[4]

2010, ApJ, 717, 1022

Jourdain, E. 2010, ApJ, 717, 1022

work page 2010
[5]

P ., Belloni, T

Fender, R. P ., Belloni, T. M., & Gallo, E. 2004, MNRAS, 355, 1105 Garc´ ıa, J. A., Dauser, T., Steiner, J. F., et al. 2015, ApJ, 808, L37 Garc´ ıa, J. A., Grinberg, V ., Steiner, J. F., et al. 2016, ApJ, 819, 76 Garc´ ıa, J. A., McClintock, J. E., Steiner, et al. 2014, ApJ, 794, 73

work page 2004
[6]

2011, Acta Polytechnica, 51, 33

Grinberg, V ., Kreykenbohm, I., F¨ urst, F., et al. 2011, Acta Polytechnica, 51, 33

work page 2011
[7]

2013, A&A, 554, A88

Grinberg, V ., Hell, N., Pottschmidt, K., et al. 2013, A&A, 554, A88

2013
[8]

2014, A&A, 565, A1

Grinberg, V ., Pottschmidt, K., B¨ ock, M., et al. 2014, A&A, 565, A1

work page 2014

Show all 35 references

[9]

& Maraschi, L

Haardt, F. & Maraschi, L. 1991, ApJ, 380, L51

1991
[10]

& Belloni, T

Homan, J. & Belloni, T. 2005, Ap&SS, 300, 107

2005
[11]

2017, ApJ, 834, 90

Huppenkothen, D., Y ounes, G., Ingram, A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 834, 90

2017
[12]

I., Robinson, E

Hynes, R. I., Robinson, E. L., Terndrup, D. M., et al. 2019, MNRAS accepted, arXiv:1905.00949

2019 arXiv
[13]

2007, ApJ, 657, 400

Joinet, A., Jourdain, E., Malzac, J., et al. 2007, ApJ, 657, 400

2007
[14]

Clark, D. J. 2012, ApJ, 761, 27

2012
[15]

2017, ApJ, 834, 130

Jourdain, E., Roques, J.-P ., & Rodi, J. 2017, ApJ, 834, 130

2017
[16]

¨O., G¨ uver, T., et al

Kalemci, E., Arabacı, M. ¨O., G¨ uver, T., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 1288

2014
[17]

2018, A Tel, 11490

Kuulkers, E., Bozzo, E., Ferrigno, C., et al. 2018, A Tel, 11490

2018
[18]

2016, in Proceedings of the 11th INTEGRAL Conference, 10-14 October 2016 Amsterdam, NL, 22

Chambouleyron, V . 2016, in Proceedings of the 11th INTEGRAL Conference, 10-14 October 2016 Amsterdam, NL, 22

2016
[19]

2011, Science, 332, 438

Laurent, P ., Rodriguez, J., Wilms, J., et al. 2011, Science, 332, 438

2011
[20]

F., Grinberg, V ., et al

Maitra, D., Scarpaci, J. F., Grinberg, V ., et al. 2017, ApJ, 851, 148 Markoﬀ, S., Nowak, M. A., & Wilms, J. 2005, ApJ, 635, 1203

2017
[21]

C., Piro, L., & Stella, L

Matt, G., Perola, G. C., Piro, L., & Stella, L. 1992, A&A, 257, 63

1992
[22]

L., Ryan, J

McConnell, M. L., Ryan, J. M., Collmar, W ., et al. 2000, ApJ, 543, 928

2000
[23]

L., Zdziarski, A

McConnell, M. L., Zdziarski, A. A., Bennett, K., et al. 2002, ApJ, 572, 984

2002
[24]

E., Kajava, J

Motta, S. E., Kajava, J. J. E., S´ anchez- Fern´ andez, C., Giustini, M., & Kuulkers, E. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 981 Mu˜ noz-Darias, T., Casares, J., Mata S´ anchez, D., et al. 2016, Nature, 534, 75

2017
[25]

2013, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1306.2307

Nandra, K., Barret, D., Barcons, X., et al. 2013, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1306.2307

2013 arXiv
[26]

2015, ApJ, 813, L21

Natalucci, L., Fiocchi, M., Bazzano, A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 813, L21

2015
[27]

A., Hanke, M., Trowbridge, S

Nowak, M. A., Hanke, M., Trowbridge, S. N., et al. 2011, ApJ, 728, 13

2011
[28]

N., Kuulkers, E., Oosterbroek, T., et al

Parmar, A. N., Kuulkers, E., Oosterbroek, T., et al. 2003, A&A, 411, L421

2003
[29]

Roques, J. P . & Jourdain, E. 2016, arXiv e- prints, arXiv:1601.05289

2016 arXiv
[30]

& Jourdain, E

Roques, J.-P . & Jourdain, E. 2019, ApJ, 870, 92 S´ anchez-Fern´ andez, C., Kajava, J. J. E., Motta, S. E., & Kuulkers, E. 2017, A&A, 602, A40

2019
[31]

2016, Nature, 531, 341

Siegert, T., Diehl, R., Greiner, J., et al. 2016, Nature, 531, 341

2016
[32]

J., Tomsick, J

Walton, D. J., Tomsick, J. A., Madsen, K. K., et al. 2016, ApJ, 826, 87

2016
[33]

C., Ramsey, B., O’Dell, S., et al

Weisskopf, M. C., Ramsey, B., O’Dell, S., et al. 2016, in SPIE Conference Series, V ol. 9905, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, 990517

2016
[34]

A., Lubi´ nski, P ., & Sikora, M

Zdziarski, A. A., Lubi´ nski, P ., & Sikora, M. 2012, MNRAS, 423, 663

2012
[35]

N., Feroci, M., Santangelo, A., et al

Zhang, S. N., Feroci, M., Santangelo, A., et al. 2016, in SPIE Conference Series, V ol. 9905, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, 99051Q

2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

2011, ApJ, 739, 58 Grinberg: Black hole XRBs with INTEGRAL 5

Cabanac, C., Roques, J.-P ., & Jourdain, E. 2011, ApJ, 739, 58 Grinberg: Black hole XRBs with INTEGRAL 5

work page 2011

[2] [2]

2019b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1904.09112 Del Santo, M

Cangemi, F., Beuchert, T., Siegert, T., et al. 2019b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1904.09112 Del Santo, M. 2012, in Journal of Physics Conference Series, V ol. 354, Journal of Physics Conference Series, 012003 Del Santo, M., Belloni, T. M., Tomsick, J. A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 3585 Del Santo, M., Malzac, J., Belmont, R., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 209

arXiv 1904

[3] [3]

Begelman, M. C. 1997, ApJ, 487, 759

1997

[4] [4]

2010, ApJ, 717, 1022

Jourdain, E. 2010, ApJ, 717, 1022

work page 2010

[5] [5]

P ., Belloni, T

Fender, R. P ., Belloni, T. M., & Gallo, E. 2004, MNRAS, 355, 1105 Garc´ ıa, J. A., Dauser, T., Steiner, J. F., et al. 2015, ApJ, 808, L37 Garc´ ıa, J. A., Grinberg, V ., Steiner, J. F., et al. 2016, ApJ, 819, 76 Garc´ ıa, J. A., McClintock, J. E., Steiner, et al. 2014, ApJ, 794, 73

work page 2004

[6] [6]

2011, Acta Polytechnica, 51, 33

Grinberg, V ., Kreykenbohm, I., F¨ urst, F., et al. 2011, Acta Polytechnica, 51, 33

work page 2011

[7] [7]

2013, A&A, 554, A88

Grinberg, V ., Hell, N., Pottschmidt, K., et al. 2013, A&A, 554, A88

2013

[8] [8]

2014, A&A, 565, A1

Grinberg, V ., Pottschmidt, K., B¨ ock, M., et al. 2014, A&A, 565, A1

work page 2014