Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 49 references

The role of surface depletion layer effects on the enhancement of the UV emission in ZnO induced by a nanostructured Al surface coating

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A surface depletion layer whose thickness shrinks with carrier density governs the UV emission enhancement in Al-coated ZnO.

desk verdict A valuable systematic dataset on ZnO/Al UV enhancement, but the paper's central depletion-layer mechanism is contradicted by its own band-bending measurement. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08337 v1 pith:WFRXIFMZ submitted 2019-08-22 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Saskia Fiedler , Laurent O. Lee Cheong Lem , Cuong Ton-That , Matthew R. Phillips This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph PACS 78.60.Hk78.55.Et73.20.Mf
keywords zincoxidealuminumnanoparticleslocalizedsurfaceplasmonscathodoluminescencephotoluminescencedepletionlayerUVemissionenhancementcarrierdensity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to show that the UV emission boost seen when ZnO is coated with a thin aluminum film is not solely a plasmonic effect: the metal also creates a carrier-depleted surface zone whose thickness is set by the crystal's carrier density. Because higher doping thins that zone, the enhancement factor becomes tunable, rising from about 12-fold at low carrier density to 17-fold at high carrier density. If correct, this gives a single explanation for the wildly scattered enhancement factors reported for seemingly identical Al-coated ZnO samples. A sympathetic reader would therefore take the central claim to be that the depletion layer, not just the aluminum nanoparticles, is a controlled dial for UV emission.

What carries the argument

The central object is the surface depletion layer of the Al-coated ZnO, whose width $W=\sqrt{2\varepsilon_0\varepsilon_r V_{BB}/q n_e}$ and surface field $E_s=q n_e W/\varepsilon_0\varepsilon_r$ are computed from the measured surface band bending $V_{BB}$ and the bulk carrier density $n_e$. This layer does the explanatory work: a thinner depletion region at higher $n_e$ removes free-carrier Auger recombination and electron-exciton scattering, lengthens exciton diffusion, and ionizes shallow donors involved in competing green luminescence, all of which contribute to the measured UV enhancement on top of the plasmonic coupling.

What would settle it

Measure the carrier depth profile of Al-coated ZnO directly with capacitance-voltage profiling or surface photovoltage: if electrons accumulate rather than deplete beneath the coating, the depletion-layer enhancement model is wrong. A second check is to measure $V_{BB}$ separately on each carrier-density sample; if the enhancement-versus-$n_e$ trend disappears when per-sample band bending is used in $W$, the claimed control mechanism collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper reports that on a-plane ZnO single crystals coated with a 2 nm Al film, the UV near-band-edge emission is enhanced by up to 17 times in photoluminescence at the highest carrier density ($2\times10^{17}$ cm$^{-3}$) and by about 12 times at the lowest ($3\times10^{13}$ cm$^{-3}$). Depth-resolved cathodoluminescence shows the gain is largest near the Al-ZnO interface, consistent with exciton-localized-surface-plasmon coupling, but correlative CL, PL, and valence-band XPS reveal two additional contributions: the coating suppresses non-radiative surface recombination present on uncoated ZnO, and it induces surface band bending. The paper's key quantitative claim is that increasing the carrier density $n_e$ shrinks the depletion width $W$ and raises the surface field $E_s$, and that this thinner depletion layer removes competitive Auger and electron-exciton scattering channels while ionizing deeper neutral donors, thereby increasing the UV emission. The paper therefore concludes that the enhancement factor can be controlled through carrier density and that neglect of these depletion-layer effects explains the large spread of enhancement values in the literature.

Load-bearing premise

The mechanism assumes the Al coating creates a carrier-free depletion layer beneath the ZnO surface, but the paper's own XPS interpretation says Al transfers electrons into ZnO and produces a surface accumulation layer, which is the opposite carrier profile.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, Al-coated ZnO UV enhancement can be engineered in a controlled way by doping rather than by changing the metal nanostructure alone.
  • The wide range of enhancement factors in the literature becomes interpretable: samples with different carrier densities should show systematically different gains even when the Al coating looks identical.
  • The depth dependence of the enhancement follows naturally: thinner depletion layers at higher $n_e$ put most of the gain near the surface, as observed in depth-resolved CL.
  • The observed quenching of green luminescence and increase of orange luminescence near the surface are explained by band-bending-induced ionization of shallow donors, not by plasmonic coupling.
  • The model predicts that the enhancement factor should depend on excitation power more strongly for high-$n_e$ samples, because injected carriers partially collapse the depletion layer and add bulk Auger losses.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: if the depletion-layer mechanism is correct, the same tunable enhancement should appear with other low-work-function metal coatings, and the gain should scale with the work-function difference relative to ZnO; this is directly testable with Mg, In, or Ti coatings.
  • Editorial extension: the paper computes $W$ and $E_s$ using the band bending measured on only one carrier density, so a sharper test is to measure $V_{BB}$ on each sample; the model predicts the enhancement-versus-$n_e$ curve steepens when per-sample band bending is used.
  • Editorial extension: the paper's own XPS interpretation describes electron transfer from Al into ZnO as creating a surface accumulation layer with downward band bending, while the enhancement model assumes a carrier-free depletion region. A capacitance-voltage or surface-photovoltage profile under the coating would settle which carrier profile actually exists.
  • Editorial extension: if reduced Auger recombination is the operative mechanism, then at very high excitation densities where the depletion layer collapses, the $n_e$-dependent part of the enhancement should vanish; the observed power dependence already hints at this crossover.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a systematic study of UV emission enhancement in Al-coated n-type ZnO single crystals with carrier densities from 3 × 10^13 to 2 × 10^17 cm^-3, using depth-resolved cathodoluminescence (CL), power-dependent photoluminescence (PL), and valence-band X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (VB-XPS). The authors measure PL enhancement factors from about 12-fold to 17-fold, observe the largest enhancement closest to the Al/ZnO interface, and attribute the enhancement to exciton-localized surface plasmon coupling together with passivation of surface recombination channels and formation of a surface depletion layer whose thickness is claimed to decrease with increasing carrier density. The central claim is that the UV enhancement factor can be controlled by reducing the depletion-layer thickness via increased carrier density, which would explain the wide spread of enhancement factors reported in the literature.

Significance. If the central mechanism were correct, the manuscript would provide a practical tuning knob for plasmonic UV enhancement and a plausible explanation for the literature scatter. The empirical data are of some value: the carrier-density dependence of the enhancement factors and the depth-resolved CL measurements are potentially useful observations. The manuscript also contains a sensible qualitative discussion of surface recombination passivation and of the power-law exponents in PL and CL. However, the central mechanistic claim is internally contradicted by the paper's own VB-XPS analysis, which identifies an accumulation layer rather than a carrier-free depletion layer for the Al-coated surface. The quantitative width calculations and the conclusion that depletion-layer thickness controls the enhancement factor are therefore not supported. Because this is the principal contribution of the paper, the overall significance is limited by this internal inconsistency.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results and Discussion (VB-XPS paragraph; W/E_S equations; 'surface depletion layer' mechanism section)] The manuscript first reports that the Al coating produces a downward band bending of -0.22 V and states explicitly: 'The resulting electron transfer from the metallic Al coating to the ZnO produces a surface accumulation layer, inducing downward band bending.' For n-type ZnO, downward band bending produces electron accumulation, not a carrier-free depletion region. Nevertheless, the later mechanism section assumes 'since there are no free carriers in the depletion region' and computes W and E_S using W = sqrt(2 epsilon_0 epsilon_r V_BB / (q n_e)). That formula is valid only for a depleted surface, typically with upward band bending for n-type material; applying it to the measured negative V_BB yields a physically meaningless result. The computed depletion-layer widths (3,095 nm down to 44 nm) therefore cannot describe the carrier-free layer invoked, and the central claim that the enhancement factor is controlled by reducing the depletion-layer thickness loses its physical basis.
  2. [Results and Discussion (Fig. 2; Fig. 6; Fig. 7)] The V_BB used to calculate W and E_S for all five samples was measured on only one crystal, with n_e = 2.7 × 10^14 cm^-3. The manuscript does not establish that V_BB remains equal to -0.22 V across the carrier-density range from 3 × 10^13 to 2 × 10^17 cm^-3. Since W scales as sqrt(V_BB / n_e), the claimed monotonic decrease of W with n_e and its correlation with the enhancement factor rely on an unverified assumption. The authors should either measure V_BB for each carrier density or provide a justified model for V_BB(n_e); without this, the quantitative trend in Fig. 6 is not secured.
  3. [Results and Discussion (Fig. 6 and Fig. 7)] The enhancement factors are reported as single values (e.g., 17-fold, 12-fold) without uncertainty estimates, error bars, or replicate measurements. The central claim is a controlled quantitative dependence of the enhancement factor on carrier density, so the absence of any error analysis makes it impossible to assess whether the 12-to-17 range is statistically significant. Error bars or at least repeated measurements on the same and nominally identical samples should be provided.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract, Introduction, Results, Conclusion] The terminology for the band-bending effect is inconsistent: the VB-XPS section explicitly concludes that the Al coating produces a surface accumulation layer, whereas the abstract, introduction, results, and conclusion repeatedly refer to a 'surface depletion layer' or 'depletion region.' This is more than a wording issue, because the sign of the band bending determines the physical mechanism; the text should be harmonized after the physics is corrected.
  2. [Results (VB-XPS paragraph)] The sentence 'These results reveal a similar space charge layer width ... with VBB values measured using the VB-PS results' contains a typo: 'VB-PS' should be 'VB-XPS.'
  3. [Results (W and E_S calculations)] The text lists the sample with 'lowest n_e (2 × 10^13 cm^-3)' and 'highest n_e (1 × 10^17 cm^-3)', while the Methods section lists the samples as 3.0 × 10^13 cm^-3 and 2.0 × 10^17 cm^-3. These values should be made consistent.
  4. [Fig. 6 caption] The caption states 'carrier densities ranging from 10^13 to 10^17 cm^-3' but the exact values from the Methods section would be more informative and avoid ambiguity about the rounding used in the text.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Depletion-layer explanation restates the measured ne-dependence: W is computed from ne, so 'control by W' is a reparameterization, not an independent test.

  1. renaming known result [Abstract; Results (W and E_S equations and Fig. 6 discussion); Conclusion]
    "Significantly, it was established that the magnitude of the emission enhancement factor can be raised in a controlled way by reducing the thickness of the depletion layer by increasing the carrier density. ... For the sample with the lowest ne (2 x 1013 cm-3), the width of the depletion region is calculated to be ~ 3,095 nm, while for the highest ne (1 x 1017 cm-3) it is considerably smaller, being ~ 44 nm."

    The depletion width W is not measured for each carrier density; it is calculated from W = sqrt(2ε0εr VBB/(q ne)) with VBB taken from sample 1 and held constant. This makes W a deterministic, monotonically decreasing function of ne. Therefore the statement that the enhancement factor is raised 'by reducing the thickness of the depletion layer by increasing the carrier density' is, by construction, the same statement as 'the enhancement factor increases with ne.' The measured enhancement-versus-ne trend is re-expressed as enhancement-versus-W without any independent measurement or controlled variation of W, so the causal role of the depletion layer is a reparameterization of the same data rather than a tested prediction.

full rationale

The enhancement factors (17-fold to 12-fold) and the PL/CL intensities are direct measurements, and the depth-resolved CL profile is an independent probe of the near-interface enhancement; those observations are not derived from the model. The depletion-width calculation itself uses the standard textbook formula and no parameter fitted to the enhancement data. The circular component is limited to the explanatory step: because W is computed from the same ne values used to order the samples, the claimed control of enhancement via W is a reparameterization of the measured ne dependence. Separately, there is a serious physical inconsistency that is not circularity: the paper's own VB-XPS gives VBB = -0.22 V for the Al-coated sample and states this is a downward-bending surface accumulation layer, yet the mechanism invokes a carrier-free depletion region and the depletion-width formula. That contradiction undermines the mechanism as stated but does not itself make the derivation circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim is an interpretation of measured enhancement factors. It introduces no new entities. The key listed assumptions are the misidentification of an accumulation layer as a depletion layer and the transfer of a single measured VBB to the full sample set.

free parameters (2)
  • PL UV power law exponent m (uncoated) = 1.12 +/- 0.01
    Fitted from log-log PL intensity vs laser power; supports the passivation sub-thesis, not the central depletion-layer claim.
  • PL UV power law exponent m (Al-coated) = 1.04 +/- 0.01
    Fitted from log-log PL intensity vs laser power; used to infer linear recombination in coated sample.
assumptions (4)
  • ad hoc to paper Downward band bending in n-type ZnO produces a carrier-free depletion layer
    The paper's VB-XPS section explicitly describes downward bending from Al as creating an accumulation layer via electron transfer into ZnO, yet later relies on 'no free carriers in the depletion region' to explain enhancement.
  • domain assumption A 2 nm Al film forms nanoparticles with a localized surface plasmon resonance in the UV
    Assumed from prior work; no AFM/SEM/optical absorption data characterize the Al film in this paper.
  • domain assumption The VBB measured on the 2.7e14 cm^-3 sample applies to all carrier densities
    Depletion widths for the lowest and highest ne are computed using the same VBB value from sample 1, with no VB-XPS measurements on the other crystals.
  • standard math Standard semiconductor space-charge and work-function relations
    Depletion width and field equations from Sze; work-function argument for band bending. Background knowledge, not specific to this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The role of surface depletion layer effects on the enhancement of the UV emission in ZnO induced by a nanostructured Al surface coating." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WFRXIFMZ

@misc{pith2026190808337,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The role of surface depletion layer effects on the enhancement of the UV emission in ZnO induced by a nanostructured Al surface coating},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WFRXIFMZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08337}
}
read the original abstract

The UV enhancement of Al-coated ZnO single crystals with a wide range of carrier densities is systematically studied using depth-resolved cathodoluminescence (CL) and photoluminescence (PL) as well as valence band X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (VB-XPS). AN up to 17-fold enhanced PL UV emission for Al-coated ZnO with the highest carrier density (2 x 10^17 cm^-3) was measured, which falls to a 12-fold increase for the lowest carrier density (3 x 10^13 cm^-3). Depth-resolved CL measurements confirm that the enhancement is strongest near the metal coating-ZnO interface consistent with an increased UV emission due to an exciton-localized surface plasmon coupling mechanism. Correlative CL, PL and VB-XPS studies reveal that a number of additional effects to the presence of the Al surface coating also contribute to the UV enhancement factor. These include increased UV enhancement due to the formation of a surface depletion layer induced by the metal surface coating, which also passivates competitive non-radiative surface recombination channels found in uncoated ZnO. Significantly, it was established that the magnitude of the emission enhancement factor can be raised in a controlled way by reducing the thickness of the depletion layer by increasing the carrier density. The contribution of these effects collectively provides an explanation for the large span of enhancement factors reported in the literature.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08337 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Illustration of the LSP-exciton coupling mechanism [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Saskia Fiedler

    School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, Ultimo NSW 2007, Australia Dr. Saskia Fiedler

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    Laurent O

    Centre for Nano Optics, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark Dr. Laurent O. Lee Cheong Lem

    work page

  3. [3]

    Australian National Fabrication Facility, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia E-mail: safi@mci.sdu.dk and matthew.phillips@uts.edu.au Keywords: Localized surface plasmons, cathodoluminescence, photoluminescence, ZnO, aluminum nanoparticles Abstract The UV enhancement of Al-coated ZnO single crystals with a wide range of carrier de...

    work page

  4. [4]

    (2010) Surface plasmon enhanced band edge luminescence of ZnO nanorods by capping Au nanoparticles

    Cheng, C.W., Sie, E.J., Liu, B., Huan, C.H.A., Sum, T.C., Sun, H.D., and Fan, H.J. (2010) Surface plasmon enhanced band edge luminescence of ZnO nanorods by capping Au nanoparticles. Appl. Phys. Lett., 96 (7), 071107

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    (2009) Effects of localized surface plasmons on the photoluminescence properties of Au-coated ZnO films

    Zhang, Y., Li, X., and Ren, X. (2009) Effects of localized surface plasmons on the photoluminescence properties of Au-coated ZnO films. Opt. Express, 17 (11), 8735–8740

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    (2014) Direct Resonant Coupling of Al Surface Plasmon for Ultraviolet Photoluminescence Enhancement of ZnO Microrods

    Lu, J., Li, J., Xu, C., Li, Y., Dai, J., Wang, Y., Lin, Y., and Wang, S. (2014) Direct Resonant Coupling of Al Surface Plasmon for Ultraviolet Photoluminescence Enhancement of ZnO Microrods. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 6 (20), 18301–18305

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    (2015) Improved UV photoresponse of ZnO nanorod arrays by resonant coupling with surface plasmons of Al nanoparticles

    Lu, J., Xu, C., Dai, J., Li, J., Wang, Y., Lin, Y., and Li, P. (2015) Improved UV photoresponse of ZnO nanorod arrays by resonant coupling with surface plasmons of Al nanoparticles. Nanoscale, 7 (8), 3396–3403

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    (2012) Evidence for coupling between exciton emissions and surface plasmon in Ni-coated ZnO nanowires

    Ren, Q.J., Filippov, S., Chen, S.L., Devika, M., Koteeswara Reddy, N., Tu, C.W., Chen, W.M., and Buyanova, I.A. (2012) Evidence for coupling between exciton emissions and surface plasmon in Ni-coated ZnO nanowires. Nanotechnology, 23 (42), 425201

    work page 2012

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    (2013) Band edge emission enhancement by quadrupole surface plasmon–exciton coupling using direct-contact Ag/ZnO nanospheres

    Zang, Y., He, X., Li, J., Yin, J., Li, K., Yue, C., Wu, Z., Wu, S., and Kang, J. (2013) Band edge emission enhancement by quadrupole surface plasmon–exciton coupling using direct-contact Ag/ZnO nanospheres. Nanoscale, 5 (2), 574–580

    2013

  2. [10]

    (2015) A facile method for fabricating Au-nanoparticles-decorated ZnO nanorods with greatly enhanced near-band-edge emission

    Su, L., and Qin, N. (2015) A facile method for fabricating Au-nanoparticles-decorated ZnO nanorods with greatly enhanced near-band-edge emission. Ceram. Int., 41, 2673–2679

    2015

  3. [11]

    (2014) Hot-Electron Injection in Au Nanorod–ZnO Nanowire Hybrid Device for Near-Infrared Photodetection

    Pescaglini, A., Martín, A., Cammi, D., Juska, G., Ronning, C., Pelucchi, E., and Iacopino, D. (2014) Hot-Electron Injection in Au Nanorod–ZnO Nanowire Hybrid Device for Near-Infrared Photodetection. Nano Lett., 14 (11), 6202–6209

    2014

  4. [12]

    (2007) Silver and Sulfur: Case Studies, SMTA Inter

    Hillman, C., Arnold, J., Binfield, S., Seppi, J., and Park, C. (2007) Silver and Sulfur: Case Studies, SMTA Inter. 13

    2007

  5. [13]

    (2009) SERS Not To Be Taken for Granted in the Presence of Oxygen

    Erol, M., Han, Y., Stanley, S.K., Stafford, C.M., Du, H., and Sukhishvili, S. (2009) SERS Not To Be Taken for Granted in the Presence of Oxygen. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 131 (22), 7480–7481

    2009

  6. [14]

    (2012) Aluminum Plasmonic Nanoantennas

    Knight, M.W., Liu, L., Wang, Y., Brown, L., Mukherjee, S., King, N.S., Everitt, H.O., Nordlander, P., and Halas, N.J. (2012) Aluminum Plasmonic Nanoantennas. Nano Lett., 12 (11), 6000–6004

    2012

  7. [15]

    (2015) Aluminium plasmonics

    Gérard, D., and Gray, S.K. (2015) Aluminium plasmonics. J. Phys. Appl. Phys., 48 (18), 184001

    2015

  8. [16]

    (2008) Localized Surface Plasmon Resonances in Aluminum Nanodisks

    Langhammer, C., Schwind, M., Kasemo, B., and Zorić, I. (2008) Localized Surface Plasmon Resonances in Aluminum Nanodisks. Nano Lett., 8 (5), 1461–1471

    2008

  9. [17]

    (2012) Tailoring plasmon resonances in the deep-ultraviolet by size-tunable fabrication of aluminum nanostructures

    Taguchi, A., Saito, Y., Watanabe, K., Yijian, S., and Kawata, S. (2012) Tailoring plasmon resonances in the deep-ultraviolet by size-tunable fabrication of aluminum nanostructures. Appl. Phys. Lett., 101 (8), 081110

    2012

  10. [18]

    Cabrera, N., and Mott, N. F. (1949) Theory of the Oxidation of Metals. Rep. Prog. Phys. 12 163

    1949

  11. [19]

    (2019) Surface plasmon-enhanced UV-emission from ZnO by aluminum bowtie nanoantenna arrays

    Zhang, H., Su, X., Wu, H., and Liu, C. (2019) Surface plasmon-enhanced UV-emission from ZnO by aluminum bowtie nanoantenna arrays. J. Alloys Compd., 772, 460–464

    2019

  12. [20]

    (2017) Influence of Al capping on the photoluminescence of ZnO

    Ding, X., Fang, Y., Zhao, M., Wang, W., Sha, J., and Wang, Y. (2017) Influence of Al capping on the photoluminescence of ZnO. Opt. Mater. Express, 7 (6), 1898

    2017

  13. [21]

    (2011) Enhanced near band edge emission of ZnO via surface plasmon resonance of aluminum nanoparticles

    Wu, K., Lu, Y., He, H., Huang, J., Zhao, B., and Ye, Z. (2011) Enhanced near band edge emission of ZnO via surface plasmon resonance of aluminum nanoparticles. J. Appl. Phys., 110 (2), 023510

    2011

  14. [22]

    (2006) Emission enhancement from metallodielectric-capped ZnO films

    Ni, W.H., An, J., Lai, C.W., Ong, H.C., and Xu, J.B. (2006) Emission enhancement from metallodielectric-capped ZnO films. J. Appl. Phys., 100 (2), 026103

    2006

  15. [23]

    (2017) Photoluminescence enhancement of ZnO via coupling with surface plasmons on Al thin films

    Dellis, S., Kalfagiannis, N., Kassavetis, S., Bazioti, C., Dimitrakopulos, G.P., Koutsogeorgis, D.C., and Patsalas, P. (2017) Photoluminescence enhancement of ZnO via coupling with surface plasmons on Al thin films. J. Appl. Phys., 121 (10), 103104. 21

    2017

  16. [24]

    (2007) CASINO V2.42—A Fast and Easy-to-use Modeling Tool for Scanning Electron Microscopy and Microanalysis Users

    Drouin, D., Couture, A.R., Joly, D., Tastet, X., Aimez, V., and Gauvin, R. (2007) CASINO V2.42—A Fast and Easy-to-use Modeling Tool for Scanning Electron Microscopy and Microanalysis Users. Scanning, 29 (3), 92–101

    2007

  17. [25]

    (2015) Nature of red luminescence in oxygen treated hydrothermally grown zinc oxide nanorods

    Anantachaisilp, S., Smith, S.M., Ton-That, C., Pornsuwan, S., Moon, A.R., Nenstiel, C., Hoffmann, A., and Phillips, M.R. (2015) Nature of red luminescence in oxygen treated hydrothermally grown zinc oxide nanorods. J. Lumin., 168, 20–25

    2015

  18. [26]

    (2011) Correlation between Electronic Structures and Photocatalytic Activities of Nanocrystalline-(Au, Ag, and Pt) Particles on the Surface of ZnO Nanorods

    Chiou, J.W., Ray, S.C., Tsai, H.M., Pao, C.W., Chien, F.Z., Pong, W.F., Tseng, C.H., Wu, J.J., Tsai, M.-H., Chen, C.-H., Lin, H.J., Lee, J.F., and Guo, J.-H. (2011) Correlation between Electronic Structures and Photocatalytic Activities of Nanocrystalline-(Au, Ag, and Pt) Part...

    2011

  19. [27]

    (2008) Surface electronic properties of ZnO nanoparticles

    Ton-That, C., Phillips, M.R., Foley, M., Moody, S.J., and Stampfl, A.P.J. (2008) Surface electronic properties of ZnO nanoparticles. Appl. Phys. Lett., 92 (26), 261916

    2008

  20. [28]

    (2011) Polarity effects in the x-ray photoemission of ZnO and other wurtzite semiconductors

    Allen, M.W., Zemlyanov, D.Y., Waterhouse, G.I.N., Metson, J.B., Veal, T.D., McConville, C.F., and Durbin, S.M. (2011) Polarity effects in the x-ray photoemission of ZnO and other wurtzite semiconductors. Appl. Phys. Lett., 98 (10), 101906

    2011

  21. [29]

    (2012) Probing Surface Band Bending of Surface-Engineered Metal Oxide Nanowires

    Chen, C.-Y., Retamal, J.R.D., Wu, I.-W., Lien, D.-H., Chen, M.-W., Ding, Y., Chueh, Y.-L., Wu, C.-I., and He, J.-H. (2012) Probing Surface Band Bending of Surface-Engineered Metal Oxide Nanowires. ACS Nano, 6 (11), 9366–9372

    2012

  22. [30]

    (2006) Influence of adsorbed oxygen on the surface photovoltage and photoluminescence of ZnO nanorods

    Lin, Y., Wang, D., Zhao, Q., Li, Z., Ma, Y., and Yang, M. (2006) Influence of adsorbed oxygen on the surface photovoltage and photoluminescence of ZnO nanorods. Nanotechnology, 17 (9), 2110–2115

    2006

  23. [31]

    (2014) Surface state modulation through wet chemical treatment as a route to controlling the electrical properties of ZnO nanowire arrays investigated with XPS

    Lord, A.M., Maffeis, T.G., Allen, M.W., Morgan, D., Davies, P.R., Jones, D.R., Evans, J.E., Smith, N.A., and Wilks, S.P. (2014) Surface state modulation through wet chemical treatment as a route to controlling the electrical properties of ZnO nanowire arrays investigated with ...

    2014

  24. [32]

    (2003) Semiconductor Materials: An Introduction to Basic Principles, Springer Science & Business Media

    Yacobi, B.G. (2003) Semiconductor Materials: An Introduction to Basic Principles, Springer Science & Business Media

    2003

  25. [33]

    (1971) Theory of Metal Surfaces: Work Function

    Lang, N.D., and Kohn, W. (1971) Theory of Metal Surfaces: Work Function. Phys. Rev. B, 3 (4), 1215–1223

    1971

  26. [34]

    Mitchell Edgar William John, Mitchell John Wesley, and Mott Nevill Francis (1951) The work functions of copper, silver and aluminium. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. Math. Phys. Sci., 210 (1100), 70–84

    1951

  27. [35]

    (1997) Work function determination of zinc oxide films

    Sundaram, K.B., and Khan, A. (1997) Work function determination of zinc oxide films. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A, 15, 428

    1997

  28. [36]

    M., and Ng, K.S

    Sze, S. M., and Ng, K.S. (2007) Physics of Semiconductor Devices

    2007

  29. [37]

    (2006) Acceptors in ZnO Studied by Photoluminescence

    Reshchikov, M.A., Garbus, J., Lopez, G., Ruchala, M., Nemeth, B., and Nause, J. (2006) Acceptors in ZnO Studied by Photoluminescence. MRS Online Proc. Libr. Arch., 957

    2006

  30. [38]

    (2006) Identification of oxygen and zinc vacancy optical signals in ZnO

    Børseth, T.M., Svensson, B.G., Kuznetsov, A.Yu., Klason, P., Zhao, Q.X., and Willander, M. (2006) Identification of oxygen and zinc vacancy optical signals in ZnO. Appl. Phys. Lett., 89 (26), 262112

    2006

  31. [39]

    (2008) Yellow luminescence in ZnO layers grown on sapphire

    Reshchikov, M.A., Xie, J.Q., Hertog, B., and Osinsky, A. (2008) Yellow luminescence in ZnO layers grown on sapphire. J. Appl. Phys., 103 (10), 103514

    2008

  32. [40]

    (2012) Characteristics of point defects in the green luminescence from Zn- and O-rich ZnO

    Ton-That, C., Weston, L., and Phillips, M.R. (2012) Characteristics of point defects in the green luminescence from Zn- and O-rich ZnO. Phys. Rev. B, 86 (11)

    2012

  33. [41]

    (2017) Charge state switching of Cu acceptors in ZnO nanorods

    Rahman, M.A., Westerhausen, M.T., Nenstiel, C., Choi, S., Hoffmann, A., Gentle, A., Phillips, M.R., and Ton-That, C. (2017) Charge state switching of Cu acceptors in ZnO nanorods. Appl. Phys. Lett., 110 (12), 121907

    2017

  34. [42]

    (2012) Photoluminescence of Zinc Oxide Nanowires: The Effect of Surface Band Bending

    Wang, D., and Reynolds, N. (2012) Photoluminescence of Zinc Oxide Nanowires: The Effect of Surface Band Bending. ISRN Condens. Matter Phys., 1–6

    2012

  35. [43]

    (2007) Luminescence properties of defects in ZnO

    Reshchikov, M.A., Morkoc, H., Nemeth, B., Nause, J., Xie, J., Hertog, B., and Osinsky, A. (2007) Luminescence properties of defects in ZnO. Phys. B, 401–402, 358–361. 22

    2007

  36. [44]

    (2000) The Kinetics of the Radiative and Nonradiative Processes in Nanocrystalline ZnO Particles upon Photoexcitation

    van Dijken, A., Meulenkamp, E.A., Vanmaekelbergh, D., and Meijerink, A. (2000) The Kinetics of the Radiative and Nonradiative Processes in Nanocrystalline ZnO Particles upon Photoexcitation. J. Phys. Chem. B, 104 (8), 1715–1723

    2000

  37. [45]

    (1990) Surface excitons in ZnO crystals

    Travnikov, V.V., Freiberg, A., and Savikhin, S.F. (1990) Surface excitons in ZnO crystals. J. Lumin., 47, 107–112

    1990

  38. [46]

    (2005) A comprehensive review of ZnO materials and devices

    Özgür, Ü., Alivov, Ya.I., Liu, C., Teke, A., Reshchikov, M.A., Doğan, S., Avrutin, V., Cho, S.-J., and Morkoç, H. (2005) A comprehensive review of ZnO materials and devices. J. Appl. Phys., 98 (4), 041301

    2005

  39. [47]

    (2010) Zinc Oxide, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Klingshirn, C.F., Meyer, B.K., Waag, A., Hoffmann, A., and Geurts, J. (2010) Zinc Oxide, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg

    2010

  40. [48]

    (1971) Wannier Exciton in an Electric Field

    Blossey, D.F. (1971) Wannier Exciton in an Electric Field. II. Electroabsorption in Direct-Band-Gap Solids. Phys. Rev. B, 3 (4), 1382–1391

    1971

  41. [49]

    (2012) Excitonic transport in ZnO

    Noltemeyer, M., Bertram, F., Hempel, T., Bastek, B., Polyakov, A., Christen, J., Brandt, M., Lorenz, M., and Grundmann, M. (2012) Excitonic transport in ZnO. J. Mater. Res., 27 (17), 2225– 2231. Acknowledgement: The authors would like to thank Katie McBean, Geoff McCredie and ...

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.