Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 33 references

Hyperbolicity of coarse moduli spaces and isotriviality for certain families

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that the coarse moduli spaces of canonically polarized and of polarized Calabi-Yau manifolds are Kobayashi V-hyperbolic, and derives isotriviality for smooth families over H-special bases.

desk verdict A substantial, likely correct paper on V-hyperbolicity of coarse moduli spaces; the one real gap in the proof of Theorem B is a constant issue, easily fixed. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08372 v1 pith:Z5LETOOK submitted 2019-08-22 math.AG math.CV

classification math.AGmath.CV MSC 32Q4532G1314D2214D0714J15
keywords KobayashiV-hyperbolicitycoarsemodulispacecomplexV-spaceisotrivialityconjecturecanonicallypolarizedmanifoldsCalabi-Yauperioddomainessentialdimension
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that the coarse moduli spaces of canonically polarized manifolds and of polarized Calabi-Yau manifolds are hyperbolic in a sense adapted to their quotient singularities, called Kobayashi V-hyperbolicity. The payoff is an isotriviality theorem: any smooth family of such manifolds over a base whose Kobayashi pseudo-distance vanishes identically must have all fibers isomorphic. For polarized Calabi-Yau manifolds the paper constructs a Kähler V-metric on moduli space with non-positive holomorphic bisectional curvature and negative holomorphic sectional curvature, giving hyperbolicity directly. It also proves that for a smooth projective family of Calabi-Yau manifolds the essential dimension of the base is at least the variation of the family, yielding new cases of the isotriviality conjecture and a lower bound on Kodaira dimension.

What carries the argument

The central object is the complex V-space, a complex space locally presented as a quotient of an analytic space by a finite group action, together with V-morphisms that lift locally to the covering spaces. The argument runs on two metric mechanisms. For canonically polarized manifolds, it assembles Weil-Petersson metrics of all orders, pulled back through iterated Kodaira-Spencer maps, into a Finsler V-metric with uniformly negative Gaussian curvature, and applies a Schwarz-Pick criterion to conclude Kobayashi V-hyperbolicity. For polarized Calabi-Yau manifolds, the mechanism is the period map from each local Kuranishi base to a period domain; the Hodge metric there has negative holomorphic sectional curvature along horizontal directions, and the paper proves the pullback glues into a globally defined Kähler V-metric with the same curvature signs, so the Ahlfors-Schwarz lemma applies.

What would settle it

Compute the holomorphic sectional curvature of the Hodge metric pulled back through the period map on any polarized Calabi-Yau Kuranishi base of dimension at least two; a single point where some holomorphic sectional curvature is nonnegative, or a sequence of points where the supremum approaches zero, would contradict Theorem C's uniform negative bound.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the coarse moduli spaces of canonically polarized manifolds and of polarized Calabi-Yau manifolds are Kobayashi V-hyperbolic: no nonconstant V-morphism from the unit disk can identify two distinct points, where V-morphisms are maps that lift locally through the finite group covers defining the space. For canonically polarized manifolds, the proof combines the local description of moduli space as finite quotients of Kuranishi spaces with Finsler metrics built from higher-order Kodaira-Spencer maps, and shows that a suitable positive combination of these metrics has uniformly negative Gaussian curvature. For polarized Calabi-Yau manifolds, the paper shows that the Hodge metric pulled back from the period domain glues to a Kähler V-metric whose holomorphic sectional curvature is uniformly negative and whose bisectional curvature is non-positive; the Ahlfors-Schwarz lemma then gives hyperbolicity. From these hyperbolicity statements, every smooth family over an H-special base has constant moduli map and is therefore isotrivial.

Load-bearing premise

The argument needs the uniform negative bound on holomorphic sectional curvature to survive when the period-domain metric is pulled back to each local Kuranishi base of a polarized Calabi-Yau family; if that curvature becomes less negative, or fails to stay uniformly negative, the Kähler V-metric and hyperbolicity conclusion do not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any smooth proper family of canonically polarized or polarized Calabi-Yau manifolds over a complex manifold whose Kobayashi pseudo-distance vanishes identically is isotrivial: all fibers are isomorphic.
  • The coarse moduli space of canonically polarized manifolds admits no nonconstant V-morphism from the complex line, or from any H-special complex manifold.
  • The coarse moduli space of polarized Calabi-Yau manifolds carries a Kähler V-metric with non-positive holomorphic bisectional curvature and uniformly negative holomorphic sectional curvature.
  • For a smooth projective family of Calabi-Yau manifolds over a quasi-projective base $Y$, one has $\mathrm{ess}(Y) \geq \mathrm{Var}(f)$; in particular a special base forces isotriviality, and either $\kappa(Y) = -\infty$ or $\kappa(Y) \geq \mathrm{Var}(f)$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same V-space metric strategy should apply to any moduli problem with smooth local deformation spaces, finite automorphism groups, and an immersive period map; Kobayashi V-hyperbolicity would then follow by the same gluing and curvature arguments.
  • Theorem D's inequality suggests a general principle: for any smooth family whose period map is generically immersive and whose image is of log general type, the essential dimension of the base should bound the variation of the family from below.
  • A concrete test of the load-bearing curvature assumption is to compute the pulled-back Hodge metric on an explicit multiparameter Calabi-Yau Kuranishi space; if its holomorphic sectional curvature ever reaches zero, the uniform negative bound in Theorem C would require an additional argument.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proves several strong hyperbolicity and isotriviality results for families of canonically polarized and polarized Calabi-Yau manifolds. Specifically, it defines Kobayashi V-hyperbolicity for complex V-spaces, proves in Theorem B that the coarse moduli space of canonically polarized manifolds is Kobayashi V-hyperbolic, proves in Theorem C that the coarse moduli space of polarized Calabi-Yau manifolds admits a Kähler V-metric with non-positive holomorphic bisectional curvature and negative holomorphic sectional curvature, and deduces Theorem A that smooth families over H-special bases are isotrivial. It also proves Theorem D, asserting that for smooth projective families of Calabi-Yau manifolds the essential dimension of the base is at least the variation of the family, with consequences for special bases and Kodaira dimension. The proofs combine the To-Yeung curvature algorithm for augmented Weil-Petersson metrics, Schumacher's extension results, the Fujiki-Schumacher theory of coarse moduli spaces, and period-domain techniques of Griffiths-Schmid and Brunebarbe-Cadorel.

Significance. If correct, the main theorems constitute a substantial advance: Theorem B gives a hyperbolic version of Campana's isotriviality conjecture for canonically polarized manifolds, and Theorem C is a strong hyperbolicity statement for the coarse moduli space of polarized Calabi-Yau manifolds, going beyond previously known special cases. The proof strategy is coherent and makes sophisticated use of deep external results, and the paper is clearly organized around the key V-space framework. The argument for Theorem D is elegant and combines known results on log-general-type bases of variations of Hodge structure with Campana's essential dimension. The main caveats are concentrated in Section 4, where several technical hypotheses and extension arguments need to be stated precisely; these appear repairable without changing the overall strategy.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4, Proof of Theorem B, after Eq. (5)] The step "h|_{C^0_\beta} \geq h_{\beta,1}" uses the inequality c_1 \geq 1 for the To-Yeung coefficient c_1. The cited theorem only guarantees c_i > 0, so if c_1 < 1 the displayed inequality is not justified. This gap is load-bearing because it is used to conclude h_D \geq \gamma^*(\kappa_r h_{WP}). The proof can be repaired by observing that h \geq c_1 h_1, hence h_D \geq \gamma^*(c_1 \kappa_r h_{WP}), and then replacing \kappa_r by \min_{1\leq r\leq n} c_1(r)\kappa_r, which is still a positive constant depending only on the Hilbert polynomial and the length r. The paper should state this normalization or the modified constant explicitly.
  2. [§4, Proof of Theorem B, Theorem 4.2 and its application] The paper introduces the To-Yeung construction for effectively parametrized families, but the families f_\beta : X_\beta \to C_\beta obtained by pulling back a Kuranishi family along a V-disk \gamma are not shown to be effectively parametrized. A nonconstant V-morphism may have critical points, and then the Kodaira-Spencer map \tau_1 can vanish at those points. If the cited curvature theorem requires effectiveness, the proof is incomplete as written. If the theorem is intended to hold without effectiveness, the statement of Theorem 4.2 should make this explicit and indicate how the possible degeneracies of the metrics h_{\beta,k} are handled. This is a central technical point for Theorem B and should be clarified.
  3. [§4, Proof of Theorem C, final curvature estimate for V-disks] The assertion that "the Gaussian curvature of \gamma^*h is bounded above by -c" for every V-disk \gamma needs justification when \gamma is not an immersion. In that case \gamma^*h is a degenerate Hermitian form at critical points, and the Gaussian curvature is not defined there. This is a repairable issue: one should apply the Ahlfors-Schwarz inequality on the complement of the critical locus and then extend the resulting inequality by continuity, but the proof should say this explicitly. As written, the argument skips a nontrivial degenerate-metric case that is relevant for proving Kobayashi V-hyperbolicity.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§4, after Eq. (8)] After the psh extension of \varphi_\beta, the inequality (8) should be stated as an inequality of positive currents, since \varphi_\beta may vanish at critical points of the V-morphism and \log\varphi_\beta is then not a smooth function.
  2. [§5, Claim 4.2.1, last sentence] The notation "(\varphi^*)^{-1}h_{S2}=h_{S1}" is confusing; it should be written as \varphi^*h_{S2}=h_{S1}, where \varphi^* denotes pullback of the metric by the biholomorphism \varphi:S_1\to S_2.
  3. [§5, Proof of Theorem D] The phrase "generically immersive for \mu is finite" is terse; adding a sentence that a finite morphism between complex spaces of equal dimension is generically unramified in characteristic zero would make the step transparent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the main theorems rest on external curvature results and the sole self-citation is contextual.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are not circular. Theorem B invokes the external To-Yeung algorithm to construct a negatively curved pseudo-hermitian metric h = Σ c_i h_i on a pulled-back disk, then compares it with the pulled-back Weil-Petersson metric via the equality h_{β,1} = γ^* h_WP, which holds by construction of h_WP. The local issue that the To-Yeung theorem only guarantees c_i > 0, not c_1 ≥ 1, is a correctable constant-gap in the written comparison h ≥ h_{β,1}, but it is not a circular reduction. Theorem C relies on the independent Griffiths-Schmid/Peters negativity of the holomorphic sectional curvature in horizontal directions of period domains, together with a naturality computation for the Hodge metric that is a direct isometry argument. Theorem D uses Brunebarbe-Cadorel's log-general-type theorem and standard properties of Stein factorization and essential dimension. The only self-citation, [DA19], appears in the related-results and conjecture discussion and is not used in the proofs of Theorems A through D. No equation or fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem from the author's own work is imported to force a conclusion. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The Axiom Ledger contains no empirical free parameters: the constants c_i and kappa_i in the To-Yeung construction are existential and depend only on the fixed discrete invariants of the moduli problem, not on fitted data. The central inputs are external theorems from moduli theory, period domain geometry, and hyperbolicity. No new physical or geometric entities are postulated. The main unstated assumptions are technical: the inheritance of curvature bounds under pullback by period maps and an implicit lower bound on the coefficient c_1 in the proof of Theorem B.

assumptions (8)
  • standard math Coarse moduli spaces M_H for canonically polarized and polarized Calabi-Yau manifolds exist as Hausdorff reduced complex V-spaces, with local Galois covers from Kuranishi families, by Fujiki-Schumacher [FS90].
    Used at the start of Section 4 and throughout the proofs of Theorems B and C; the V-space formalism and local liftability of moduli maps rest on this.
  • standard math To-Yeung's algorithm: for an effectively parametrized family of canonically polarized manifolds over a Riemann surface, there exist constants c_i > 0 depending only on n, c_1(K_X)^n, and r such that h = sum c_i h_i has Gaussian curvature bounded above by a negative constant, with the bound…
    Invoked in the proof of Theorem B, stated in the paper as Theorem 4.2, to build a psh metric with uniform curvature bound on the disk.
  • standard math Schumacher's boundedness and extension result [Sch12, Proposition 12]: each local density phi_beta is bounded above on relatively compact subsets and extends as a psh function satisfying the curvature inequality.
    Used in the proof of Theorem B after inequality (8) to glue local metrics into a global psh metric on D.
  • standard math Griffiths-Schmid and Peters: the Hodge metric on a period domain has holomorphic sectional curvature negative and uniformly bounded away from 0 along horizontal directions, and the pulled-back metric on the base inherits the needed sign properties.
    Used in the proofs of Theorems C and D; this is the source of negativity for the Kähler V-metric and for the Finsler metric on Z^0.
  • standard math Brunebarbe-Cadorel [BC17]: the base of a generically immersive period map of a Z-variation of polarized Hodge structure is of log general type, that is, K_Z + E is big.
    Used in the proof of Theorem D to obtain K_Z + E big, which then triggers Lemma 2.3 and yields ess(Y) >= dim Z.
  • standard math Campana's essential dimension properties: essential dimension is invariant under etale covers and bimeromorphic modifications; a quasi-projective manifold is special if and only if its essential dimension is 0; and kappa(Y) >= ess(Y) when kappa(Y) >= 0.
    Used in the proof of Theorem D and in the deductions (1) and (2), citing [Cam11, Remarque 10.3(1), Example 10.4, Proposition 10.11].
  • standard math The infinitesimal Torelli theorem holds for Calabi-Yau manifolds, so the period map has rank equal to the Kodaira-Spencer rank and dim Z = Var(f).
    Used in the proofs of Theorems C and D to ensure immersivity of the period map and to identify dim of the period image with the variation.
  • standard math Sommese's theorem on compactification and Stein factorization of period maps after finite etale covers, as used in [Som78, Proposition III, Remark III.C] and [BBT18, Theorem 7.7].
    Used in the proof of Theorem D to obtain the diagram with proper modifications and a surjective map pi^0 with connected fibers.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hyperbolicity of coarse moduli spaces and isotriviality for certain families." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Z5LETOOK

@misc{pith2026190808372,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hyperbolicity of coarse moduli spaces and isotriviality for certain families},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Z5LETOOK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08372}
}
abstract

In this paper, we prove the Kobayashi hyperbolicity of the coarse moduli spaces of canonically polarized or polarized Calabi-Yau manifolds in the sense of complex $V$-spaces (a generalization of complex $V$-manifolds in the sense of Satake). As an application, we prove the following hyperbolic version of Campana's isotriviality conjecture: for the smooth family of canonically polarized or polarized Calabi-Yau manifolds, when the Kobayashi pseudo-distance of the base vanishes identically, the family must be isotrivial, that is, any two fibers are isomorphic. We also prove that for the smooth projective family of polarized Calabi-Yau manifolds, its variation of the family is less than or equal to the essential dimension of the base.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Benjamin Bakker , Yohan Brunebarbe , and Jacob Tsimerman , o-minimal GAGA and a conjecture of Griffiths , arXiv e-prints (2018), arXiv:1811.12230

  2. [2]

    Yohan Brunebarbe and Benoit Cadorel , Hyperbolicity of varieties supporting a variation of Hodge structure , arXiv e-prints (2017), arXiv:1707.01327

  3. [3]

    Bo Berndtsson , Mihai P a un , and Xu Wang , Algebraic fiber spaces and curvature of higher direct images , arXiv e-prints (2017), arXiv:1704.02279

  4. [4]

    Reine Angew

    Yohan Brunebarbe, Symmetric differentials and variations of H odge structures , J. Reine Angew. Math. 743 (2018), 133--161, https://doi.org/10.1515/crelle-2015-0109

  5. [5]

    4, 1273--1306, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10231-016-0616-1

    Simone Borghesi and Giuseppe Tomassini, Analytic stacks and hyperbolicity, Annali di Matematica Pura ed Applicata (1923 -) 196 (2017), no. 4, 1273--1306, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10231-016-0616-1

  6. [6]

    Fr\' e d\' e ric Campana, Orbifolds, special varieties and classification theory, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 54 (2004), no. 3, 499--630, http://aif.cedram.org/item?id=AIF_2004__54_3_499_0

  7. [7]

    , Orbifoldes g\' e om\' e triques sp\' e ciales et classification bim\' e romorphe des vari\' e t\' e s k\" a hl\' e riennes compactes , J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 10 (2011), no. 4, 809--934, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474748010000101

  8. [8]

    168, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017, Second edition of [ MR2012297]

    James Carlson, Stefan M\" u ller-Stach, and Chris Peters, Period mappings and period domains, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 168, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017, Second edition of [ MR2012297]

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    Fr\' e d\' e ric Campana and Mihai P a un, Orbifold generic semi-positivity: an application to families of canonically polarized manifolds, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 65 (2015), no. 2, 835--861, http://aif.cedram.org/item?id=AIF_2015__65_2_835_0

  2. [10]

    , Positivity properties of the bundle of logarithmic tensors on compact K \" a hler manifolds , Compos. Math. 152 (2016), no. 11, 2350--2370, https://doi.org/10.1112/S0010437X16007442

  3. [11]

    , Foliations with positive slopes and birational stability of orbifold cotangent bundles, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes \' E tudes Sci. 129 (2019), 1--49, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10240-019-00105-w

  4. [12]

    Ya Deng and Dan Abramovich, On the hyperbolicity of base spaces for maximally variational families of smooth projective varieties , https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01874489, HAL pré-publication, hal-01874489, version 2

  5. [13]

    Jean-Pierre Demailly, Algebraic criteria for K obayashi hyperbolic projective varieties and jet differentials , Algebraic geometry--- S anta C ruz 1995, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 62, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1997, pp. 285--360

  6. [14]

    Akira Fujiki and Georg Schumacher, The moduli space of extremal compact K \" a hler manifolds and generalized W eil- P etersson metrics , Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 26 (1990), no. 1, 101--183, https://doi.org/10.2977/prims/1195171664

  7. [15]

    Griffiths, Periods of integrals on algebraic manifolds

    Phillip A. Griffiths, Periods of integrals on algebraic manifolds. III . S ome global differential-geometric properties of the period mapping , Inst. Hautes \' E tudes Sci. Publ. Math. (1970), no. 38, 125--180, http://www.numdam.org/item?id=PMIHES_1970__38__125_0

  8. [16]

    123 (1969), 253--302, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02392390

    Phillip Griffiths and Wilfried Schmid, Locally homogeneous complex manifolds, Acta Math. 123 (1969), 253--302, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02392390

  9. [17]

    Kelly Jabbusch and Stefan Kebekus, Families over special base manifolds and a conjecture of C ampana , Math. Z. 269 (2011), no. 3-4, 847--878, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-010-0758-6

  10. [18]

    , Positive sheaves of differentials coming from coarse moduli spaces, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 61 (2011), no. 6, 2277--2290 (2012), https://doi.org/10.5802/aif.2673

  11. [19]

    Kov\' a cs, Families of canonically polarized varieties over surfaces, Invent

    Stefan Kebekus and S\' a ndor J. Kov\' a cs, Families of canonically polarized varieties over surfaces, Invent. Math. 172 (2008), no. 3, 657--682, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-008-0128-8

  12. [20]

    Ljudmila Kamenova, Steven Lu, and Misha Verbitsky, Kobayashi pseudometric on hyperk\" a hler manifolds , J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 90 (2014), no. 2, 436--450, https://doi.org/10.1112/jlms/jdu038

  13. [21]

    318, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03582-5

    Shoshichi Kobayashi, Hyperbolic complex spaces, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 318, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03582-5

  14. [22]

    , Hyperbolic manifolds and holomorphic mappings, second ed., World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1142/5936, An introduction

  15. [23]

    Zhiqin Lu, On the geometry of classifying spaces and horizontal slices, Amer. J. Math. 121 (1999), no. 1, 177--198, http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/american_journal_of_mathematics/v121/121.1lu.pdf

  16. [24]

    C. A. M. Peters, Curvature for period domains, Complex geometry and L ie theory ( S undance, UT , 1989), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 53, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1991, pp. 261--268

  17. [25]

    Georg Schumacher, Positivity of relative canonical bundles and applications, Invent. Math. 190 (2012), no. 1, 1--56, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00222-012-0374-7

  18. [26]

    , Moduli of canonically polarized manifolds, higher order K odaira- S pencer maps, and an analogy to C alabi- Y au manifolds , Uniformization, R iemann- H ilbert correspondence, C alabi- Y au manifolds & P icard- F uchs equations, Adv. Lect. Math. (ALM), vol. 42, Int. Press, S...

  19. [27]

    Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1986, pp

    Yum Tong Siu, Curvature of the W eil- P etersson metric in the moduli space of compact K \"ahler- E instein manifolds of negative first C hern class , Contributions to several complex variables, Aspects Math., E9, Friedr. Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1986, pp. 261--298

  20. [28]

    Scuola Norm

    Andrew John Sommese, On the rationality of the period mapping, Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4) 5 (1978), no. 4, 683--717, http://www.numdam.org/item?id=ASNSP_1978_4_5_4_683_0

  21. [29]

    Behrouz Taji, The isotriviality of smooth families of canonically polarized manifolds over a special quasi-projective base, Compos. Math. 152 (2016), no. 7, 1421--1434, https://doi.org/10.1112/S0010437X1600734X

  22. [30]

    Wing-Keung To and Sai-Kee Yeung, Finsler metrics and K obayashi hyperbolicity of the moduli spaces of canonically polarized manifolds , Ann. of Math. (2) 181 (2015), no. 2, 547--586, https://doi.org/10.4007/annals.2015.181.2.3

  23. [31]

    , Augmented W eil- P etersson metrics on moduli spaces of polarized R icci-flat K \" a hler manifolds and orbifolds , Asian J. Math. 22 (2018), no. 4, 705--727, https://doi.org/10.4310/AJM.2018.v22.n4.a6

  24. [32]

    30, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79745-3

    Eckart Viehweg, Quasi-projective moduli for polarized manifolds, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3) [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas (3)], vol. 30, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79745-3

  25. [33]

    279--328

    Eckart Viehweg and Kang Zuo, Base spaces of non-isotrivial families of smooth minimal models, Complex geometry ( G \" o ttingen, 2000), Springer, Berlin, 2002, pp. 279--328

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.