Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 67 references

Flares of accretion activity of the 20 Myr old UXOR RZ Psc

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read RZ Psc, an isolated star of about 20 million years, still shows brief magnetospheric accretion flares in archival high-resolution spectra, implying its gas disk survived well past the usual 10-million-year dispersal time.

desk verdict Solid detection of sporadic accretion in an old isolated UXOR; the propeller switch is plausible but hinges on an unmeasured field strength. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08673 v1 pith:KZ6NO4TZ submitted 2019-08-23 astro-ph.SR

I.S. Potravnov , V.P. Grinin , N.A. Serebriakova This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords RZPscmagnetosphericaccretionmagneticpropellerUXOrionisvariablesinversePCygniprofilescircumstellardiskevolutionCas-TauOBassociationGAIADR2astrometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

RZ Psc is an isolated, UX Orionis-type star whose previous spectra showed only outflow signatures. Using archival high-resolution spectra, this paper establishes that the star occasionally undergoes short-lived magnetospheric accretion, seen as inverse P Cygni profiles in H-alpha and Ca II 8542, while its usual wind in the alkali lines continues. The authors conclude that accretion and outflow are two states of the same magnetosphere-disk interaction, switching with the variable accretion rate, and that the wind is accretion-driven. If correct, RZ Psc is a roughly 20-million-year-old star that still retains a gas-rich inner disk, a case that would stretch the accepted timescale for inner disk dispersal.

What carries the argument

An inverse P Cygni profile, meaning a redshifted absorption dip in an emission line, is the spectroscopic signature of matter falling toward the star, and here identifies the magnetospheric accretion flow. The switch between accretion and outflow is governed by the ratio of the magnetospheric truncation radius to the corotation radius. Using the standard relation $r_{\rm tr}/R_* = 7.1\,B^{4/7}\dot{M}_{-8}^{-2/7}M_{0.5}^{-1/7}R_2^{5/7}$, the authors show that for an assumed dipolar field of a few tenths of a kG the ratio crosses the boundary between regimes as the accretion rate varies between $7\times10^{-12}$ and $5\times10^{-11}$ solar masses per year. The simultaneous presence of infall and outflow in Ca II 8542 links the two regimes and makes the wind accretion-driven.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of RZ Psc's surface magnetic field through spectropolarimetry or Zeeman Doppler imaging: if the dipolar component is found to be larger than about 0.5 kG, then for both quoted accretion rates the truncation radius stays outside corotation and the propeller should always dominate, so the inverse P Cygni profile would need a different explanation. Repeated high-cadence H-alpha monitoring that never again catches a redshifted absorption component would also weaken the claim that accretion episodes recur.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On 2013 November 16, high-resolution HIRES spectra showed a prominent inverse P Cygni profile in H-$\alpha$ and Ca II 8542, with redshifted absorption extending to about +580 km/s, corresponding to gas in free fall from roughly 10 stellar radii, close to the corotation radius $r_{\rm cor} = 9.2\,R_*$. The same Ca II profile simultaneously carried the blueshifted absorption components typical of the wind, showing infall and outflow in one line. Together with the veiling of strong photospheric lines by a hot accretion spot during a deep photometric minimum, this is taken as evidence that RZ Psc episodically accretes at a rate of about $5\times10^{-11}$ solar masses per year while usually ejecting matter through a magnetic propeller. The authors argue that at the star's likely position on the H-R diagram the dipole field should be a few tenths of a kG, so whether the truncation radius falls inside or outside the corotation radius depends on the variable accretion rate. GAIA DR2 astrometry places RZ Psc at 196 pc with space velocities close to the Cas-Tau OB association, giving a median age of $t = 20^{+3}_{-5}$ Myr and suggesting the star was born there and has preserved its primordial disk.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that RZ Psc's magnetic field is a few tenths of a kilogauss; the field is not measured, and if it is substantially stronger the propeller would dominate even during the observed accretion episode, breaking the claimed switch between regimes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If RZ Psc is truly accreting at about 20 Myr, inner gaseous disks can survive roughly twice the commonly quoted 10 Myr dispersal timescale in isolated low-mass stars.
  • The wind traced in Na I D and Ca II lines is fed by gas that first reaches the magnetosphere, so the low-excitation outflow and the accretion flares are two phases of one disk-star coupling.
  • Variable accretion rate alone can flip a star between propeller and magnetospheric accretion without any change in magnetic-field topology.
  • The appearance of accretion-spot veiling in line strengths during a deep UXOR minimum provides a way to detect weak accretion even when H-alpha emission is masked by eclipses.
  • RZ Psc's probable birth in Cas-Tau makes it a nearby, old benchmark for studying how accretion decays and how residual gas is finally cleared from a protoplanetary disk.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the assumed dipolar field is confirmed by direct measurement, similar old, isolated stars that show only blueshifted alkali absorptions could be propeller-phase accretors; their apparent debris-disk winds may actually be recycled primordial gas.
  • The coronographic effect at deep minima could be used deliberately: eclipses by dusty clumps act as natural coronagraphs that reveal weak accretion spots on other UXORs, extending this detection method beyond RZ Psc.
  • A targeted search in Cas-Tau for other low-mass members with lithium absorption, X-ray emission, mid-infrared excess, and weak H-alpha emission could test whether delayed disk clearing is common in this association.
  • Monitoring over several rotational periods should show a testable pattern: wind intensification following each accretion episode, as gas accumulated at the truncation radius is partially accreted and partially flung outward.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes archival high-resolution spectra of the isolated UX Ori-type star RZ Psc obtained with Keck/HIRES and Lick/Hamilton. On 2013 November 16 the Hα and Ca II 8542 Å lines show inverse P Cygni profiles, interpreted as the first direct evidence of magnetospheric accretion; on 2013 October 21 weak Hα emission and veiling in LSD profiles suggest enhanced accretion, and during a deep photometric minimum on November 13 the line-dependent veiling is attributed to a hot accretion spot. The authors combine these observations with the persistent blueshifted alkali absorptions to argue that RZ Psc switches between magnetospheric accretion and a magnetic propeller-driven wind depending on the mass accretion rate. Using GAIA DR2 astrometry they derive a distance of about 196 pc, kinematics consistent with possible membership in the Cas-Tau OB association, and an age of 20+3−5 Myr, implying that a primordial gas disk can survive to roughly 20 Myr.

Significance. The observational centerpiece—the IPC profiles with photospheric subtraction and the LSD veiling analysis—is credible and valuable: it provides direct spectroscopic evidence that a very old, isolated UXOR can undergo accretion episodes. If the age and kinematics hold, RZ Psc becomes a benchmark object for long-lived disk evolution. The paper also benefits from the use of independent GAIA astrometry and from presenting the archival data with sufficient detail for reproducibility. However, the broader claim that the system toggles between accretion and propeller regimes rests on an unmeasured dipolar magnetic field strength, and the age and membership are probabilistic rather than definitive; these caveats should be stated in the abstract and conclusions rather than only in the final paragraph.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 6.1, Fig. 8] The key interpretation that RZ Psc moves between magnetospheric accretion and propeller ejection depends on the dipolar magnetic field strength B, which is not measured. The adopted 'few tenths of a kG' range follows from Gregory et al. (2012) based on the star's position on the H-R diagram. Figure 8 shows that, for the two accretion rates considered (7e-12 and 5e-11 Msun/yr), r_tr/r_cor crosses unity only for B in the approximate interval 0.2-0.4 kG. Because B is a free parameter not constrained by the present observations, the unified propeller/accretion scenario is not uniquely established. The authors correctly acknowledge in the final paragraph that magnetic field measurements are desirable, but the abstract and Section 7 conclusions present the toggle as a result. I recommend rephrasing the propeller interpretation as a model-dependent hypothesis that is testable with future spectropolarimetry, while keeping the accretion detection as the firm empirical result. The mass accretion rates used in Fig. 8 are derived from the Fang et al. (2009) empirical calibration, whose intrinsic scatter (about 0.5 dex) adds further uncertainty to the location of the regime boundary; quoting this systematic uncertainty would strengthen the discussion.
  2. [Section 5] The claimed age of 20+3−5 Myr is based on two components: the isochronal position (15-23 Myr) and a kinematic birth-origin argument involving possible membership in Cas-Tau. The membership probability is only 52% (or 77% with a higher assumed internal velocity dispersion), and the Cas-Tau age itself is uncertain (20-30 Myr isochronal vs about 50 Myr kinematic). The title and abstract state '20 Myr old UXOR' as a fact. Since the long-lived-disk conclusion depends on this age, the abstract should carry a caveat such as 'probable age' or 'age consistent with 15-25 Myr', and the precision of the number in the title should be reconsidered unless the authors can defend the membership more strongly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.5] In the description of the LSD method, the authors state that the profiles for the intermediate line-depth groups are obtained with interpolation, but the exact interpolation procedure (e.g., in which quantity and over which line-depth grid) is not specified; a brief note would make the analysis reproducible.
  2. [Section 4] The argument that the line-dependent veiling at the deep minimum is produced by a hot accretion spot rather than solely by the coronographic effect would benefit from a quantitative comparison with the model predictions of Gahm et al. (2008) or Dodin and Lamzin (2012), for example the predicted ratio of veiling between weak and strong lines.
  3. [Section 6.1] The formula for r_tr/R* is presented without an equation number; since Figure 8 depends on it, adding a numbered equation would help the reader and would allow later work to refer to it precisely.
  4. [Section 5] The orbit calculations use the geometrical center of the Cas-Tau box and an assumed mean distance of 200 pc; the sensitivity of the orbital intersection epoch to these choices and to the adopted Galactic potential is not discussed.
  5. [Table 1] The note for the V magnitude on 2013 November 16 states that the value relates to the first of three spectrograms; please clarify whether the photometry corresponds to the same UT time as the first exposure or to a different epoch within the night.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the accretion signatures are directly observed and the interpretation is not forced by the paper's own definitions or fitted parameters.

full rationale

The paper's central new claim—that RZ Psc occasionally shows short-lived magnetospheric accretion events—rests on directly observed inverse P Cygni profiles in H-alpha and Ca II 8542 in archival HIRES spectra, not on a quantity fitted from the model being tested. The mass accretion rate estimates use the external empirical Fang et al. (2009) H-alpha calibration, and the age and kinematics use independent Gaia DR2 astrometry plus external isochrones and membership statistics. The propeller mechanism invoked to explain the persistent blueshifted alkali absorptions is taken from the authors' prior work, but the new IPC detection acts as an independent observational test of that model, and the MHD simulations cited (Romanova et al. 2004, 2018) come from other groups. The unmeasured dipolar field strength is an acknowledged assumption (Section 6.1, Fig. 8; 'the strength of the dipolar component of the stellar magnetic field B, which is unknown for RZ Psc'), and the paper explicitly recommends measuring it ('measurements of the RZ Psc magnetic field are desirable', Section 7). This is a correctness risk, not a circular step, because B is neither fitted from the target claim nor defined in terms of it. No equation or construction in the paper reduces its conclusions to its inputs, and the conclusions do not depend on a self-citation chain for their force.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. It relies on the standard magnetospheric accretion and propeller framework, on empirical calibrations, and on theoretical expectations for the magnetic field. The main free parameter is the unmeasured magnetic field strength, which is central to the proposed switching mechanism.

free parameters (1)
  • Dipolar magnetic field strength B = not measured; assumed 0.1 to 1 kG
    The propeller versus accretion regime depends on r_tr/r_cor, which is a function of B. Since B is unmeasured, the authors adopt a theoretical range from Gregory et al. (2012) for stars with radiative cores. This is load-bearing for the switching interpretation.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Standard magnetospheric accretion and propeller theory (r_tr versus r_cor framework) applies to RZ Psc.
    Used throughout Section 6.1 to interpret the IPC profiles and the wind. This is standard in the T Tauri and UXOR literature.
  • domain assumption The empirical H-alpha luminosity to accretion rate relation of Fang et al. (2009) holds for RZ Psc.
    Section 3.1 uses this relation to convert the H-alpha emission into an accretion rate estimate. The relation is calibrated on classical T Tauri stars and may not perfectly apply to a very low accretor.
  • domain assumption RZ Psc has a radiative core and therefore a low dipole field, as argued by Gregory et al. (2012) for pre-main-sequence stars with Mcore/M* > 0.4.
    Section 6.1: 'RZ Psc lies in the region on the diagram where the stars held substantial radiative cores. The development of a radiative zone with mass Mcore/M* > 0.4 is expected to lead to the decrease of the dipole component.' This is an extrapolation from stellar structure models, not a measurement.
  • standard math GAIA DR2 astrometry and the adopted radial velocity are accurate.
    Section 5 uses GAIA parallax and proper motions, and the radial velocity from Potravnov et al. (2014a). These are standard catalog values with quoted errors.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Flares of accretion activity of the 20 Myr old UXOR RZ Psc." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KZ6NO4TZ

@misc{pith2026190808673,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Flares of accretion activity of the 20 Myr old UXOR RZ Psc},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KZ6NO4TZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08673}
}
abstract

We discuss a revision of accretion activity and kinematics of the enigmatic isolated UX Ori type star RZ Psc. Previously, RZ Psc was known to possess only spectroscopic signatures of outflow in the low-excitation lines of alkali metals. The archival high-resolution spectra reveal a short-lived episode of magnetospheric accretion in the system observed via inverse P Cyg profiles at the H$\alpha$ and CaII 8542 $\unicode{x212B}$ lines. The simultaneous presence of accretion and outflow signatures at CaII 8542 $\unicode{x212B}$ is suggestive of an accretion-driven origin of the RZ Psc wind. We argue that RZ Psc experiences matter ejection via the magnetic propeller mechanism but variable accretion episodes allow it to sometimes move in the magnetospheric accretion regime. The presence of the weak accretion in the system is also supported by the radiation of the hot accretion spot on the stellar surface observed spectroscopically at the deep photometric minimum of the star. The Galactic motion of RZ Psc calculated with new GAIA DR2 astrometric data suggests possible membership in Cas-Tau OB association with an age of $t=20^{+3}_{-5}$ Myr.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08673 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. V band lightcurve of RZ Psc in autumn 2013 compiled from the AAVSO data (asterisks), Sanglok observations (filled circles), and ASAS-SN data (open triangles). Vertical lines mark the date of the spectroscopic observations. 0.8 1 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 −300 −100 0 100 300 500 Intensity velocity (km s−1) 0.8 1 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 −300 −100 0 100 300 500 Intensity velocity (km s−1) [PITH_FULL_IMAG… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Residual profiles of Hα line on 2013 October 21 (black line) and 2013 November 16 (light grey line). 3.3. Ca ii 8542 Å profile The Ca ii 8542 Å line displays a most complicated structure. On the night of October 21, the line profile strongly resembles that of the Hα with the same asymmetry of the broad emission hump but with a narrower (FWHM = 25 km s−1 ) central peak. On the night of November 16, the residual profi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Na i 5889 Å line observed in RZ Psc spectra with HIRES. The dates of observation as well as the velocities of the BACs (in km s−1 ) are labeled on the plots. In the plot related to the night of 2013 November 16, the black line shows the profile observed at UT 4h22m , and the thick gray line shows the observation at UT 7h30m . The Na i 5895 Å line displays similar behavior. 0.8 1 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 −300 … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Ca ii 8542 Å residual profiles in RZ Psc spectra. The observation on 2013 October 21 is shown by the black line, and the 2013 November 16 spectrum is plotted in light gray. The velocities of the BACs in km s −1 are labeled on the plots. files for the intermediate depth…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: LSD profiles for 2013 October 21 (dotted line), 2013 November 13 (thick grey line), and 2016 August 10 (thin black line) observations. The three panels represent the (a) weak, (b) medium, and (c) strong lines following the details provided in the text. The scaling fact…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Galactic orbits of centre of Cas-Tau OB association (solid line) and RZ Psc (dashed line) traced back to 30 Myr and plotted in helio￾centric rectangular XYZ coordinates. The intersection point is marked by time in the right panel. The present position of Cas-Tau member…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: RZ Psc (black dot) on the H-R diagram. The A-F-G stars of the β Pic moving group from Mamajek & Bell (2014) and its K-type members from Shkolnik et al. (2017) with GAIA parallaxes are shown by open circles. Open triangles correspond to the CTTS in Taurus from Grankin (…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The dependence of rtr/rcor from the magnetic field strength in the case of RZ Psc. The dotted line indicates the border between the magnetospheric accretion (below) and magnetic propeller (above) regimes. The unlabeled curve was computed assuming a mass accretion rate …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Batalha, C

    Basri, G. & Batalha, C. 1990, ApJ, 363, 654

    work page 1990

  2. [2]

    A., et al

    Beust, H., Lagrange, A.-M., Crawford, I. A., et al. 1998, A&A , 338, 1015

    work page 1998

  3. [3]

    Bhatt, H. C. 2000, A&A, 362, 715

    work page 2000

  4. [4]

    S., Je ffries, R

    Binks, A. S., Je ffries, R. D., & Ward, J. L. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 2465

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    1956, ApJ, 123, 408

    Blaauw, A. 1956, ApJ, 123, 408

    work page 1956

  6. [6]

    J., Trümper, J., et al

    Boller, T., Freyberg, M. J., Trümper, J., et al. 2016, A&A, 58 8, A103

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Bouvier, J., Alencar, S. H. P ., Harries, T. J., Johns-Krull, C. M., & Romanova, M. M. 2007, Protostars and Planets V , 479

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    2012, MNRAS, 427 , 127

    Bressan, A., Marigo, P ., Girardi, L., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427 , 127

    2012

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    Cutri, R. M. & et al. 2013, VizieR Online Data Catalog, 2328 de Bruijne, J. H. J. 1999, MNRAS, 306, 381 de Wit, W. J., Grinin, V . P ., Potravnov, I. S., et al. 2013, A&A, 553, L1 de Zeeuw, P . T., Hoogerwerf, R., de Bruijne, J. H. J., Brown, A. G. A., & Blaauw, A. 1999, AJ, 1...

    2013

  2. [10]

    Dodin, A. V . & Lamzin, S. A. 2012, Astronomy Letters, 38, 649

    2012

  3. [11]

    H., et al

    Donati, J.-F., Bouvier, J., Alencar, S. H., et al. 2019, MNRA S, 483, L1

    2019

  4. [12]

    M., et al

    Donati, J.-F., Bouvier, J., Walter, F. M., et al. 2011, MNRAS , 412, 2454

    2011

  5. [13]

    B., Bouvier, J., et al

    Donati, J.-F., Skelly, M. B., Bouvier, J., et al. 2010, MNRAS , 409, 1347

    2010

  6. [14]

    1994 , AJ, 108

    Edwards, S., Hartigan, P ., Ghandour, L., & Andrulis, C. 1994 , AJ, 108

    1994

  7. [15]

    2009, A&A, 504, 461

    Fang, M., van Boekel, R., Wang, W., et al. 2009, A&A, 504, 461

    2009

  8. [16]

    E., Henning, T., Jayawardhana , R., & Oliveira, J

    Fedele, D., van den Ancker, M. E., Henning, T., Jayawardhana , R., & Oliveira, J. M. 2010, A&A, 510, A72

    2010

  9. [17]

    M., & Madjar, A

    Ferlet, R., Hobbs, L. M., & Madjar, A. V . 1987, A&A, 185, 267

    1987

  10. [18]

    F., Walter, F

    Gahm, G. F., Walter, F. M., Stempels, H. C., Petrov, P . P ., & Herczeg, G. J. 2008, A&A, 482, L35 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., V allenari, A., et al. 20 18, ArXiv e-prints [arXiv:1804.09365] Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al. 2 016, A&A, 595, A1

    2008 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Grankin, K. N. 2016, Astronomy Letters, 42, 314

    2016

  12. [20]

    M., Schlafly, E

    Green, G. M., Schlafly, E. F., Finkbeiner, D., et al. 2018, MNR AS, 478, 651

    2018

  13. [21]

    G., Donati, J.-F., Morin, J., et al

    Gregory, S. G., Donati, J.-F., Morin, J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 75 5, 97

    2012

  14. [22]

    C., Gahm, G

    Grinin, V ., Stempels, H. C., Gahm, G. F., et al. 2008, A&A, 489 , 1233

    2008

  15. [23]

    P ., Mitskevich, A

    Grinin, V . P ., Mitskevich, A. S., & Tambovtseva, L. V . 2006, Astronomy Letters, 32, 110

    2006

  16. [24]

    P ., Potravnov, I

    Grinin, V . P ., Potravnov, I. S., Ilyin, I. V ., & Shulman, S. G. 2015, Astronomy Letters, 41, 407

    2015

  17. [25]

    P ., Potravnov, I

    Grinin, V . P ., Potravnov, I. S., & Musaev, F. A. 2010, A&A, 524, A8

    2010

  18. [26]

    P ., The, P

    Grinin, V . P ., The, P . S., de Winter, D., et al. 1994, A&A, 292,165

    1994

  19. [27]

    2016, ARA&A, 54, 135

    Hartmann, L., Herczeg, G., & Calvet, N. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 135

    2016

  20. [28]

    1994, ApJ, 426, 669

    Hartmann, L., Hewett, R., & Calvet, N. 1994, ApJ, 426, 669

    1994

  21. [29]

    Illarionov, A. F. & Siuniaev, R. A. 1975, Soviet Astronomy Le tters, 1, 73

    1975

  22. [30]

    M., Kenworthy, M

    Kennedy, G. M., Kenworthy, M. A., Pepper, J., et al. 2017, Roy al Society Open Science, 4, 160652

    2017

  23. [31]

    Kenyon, S. J. & Hartmann, L. 1995, ApJS, 101, 117

    1995

  24. [32]

    N., Minikulov, N

    Kiselev, N. N., Minikulov, N. K., & Chernova, G. P . 1991, Astrophysics, 34, 175

    1991

  25. [33]

    S., Shappee, B

    Kochanek, C. S., Shappee, B. J., Stanek, K. Z., et al. 2017, PA SP , 129, 104502

    2017

  26. [34]

    2016, A&A, 590, A9 6

    Kreplin, A., Madlener, D., Chen, L., et al. 2016, A&A, 590, A9 6

    2016

  27. [35]

    2013, A&A, 551, A2 1

    Kreplin, A., Weigelt, G., Kraus, S., et al. 2013, A&A, 551, A2 1

    2013

  28. [36]

    G., Ryabchikova, T

    Kupka, F. G., Ryabchikova, T. A., Piskunov, N. E., Stempels, H. C., & Weiss, W. W. 2000, Baltic Astronomy, 9, 590

    2000

  29. [37]

    1996, A&A, 310, 547

    Lagrange, A.-M., Plazy, F., Beust, H., et al. 1996, A&A, 310, 547

    1996

  30. [38]

    Mamajek, E. E. 2016, in IAU Symposium, V ol. 314, Y oung Stars a nd Planets Near the Sun, ed. J. H. Kastner, B. Stelzer, & S. A. Metchev, 21 –26

    2016

  31. [39]

    Mamajek, E. E. & Bell, C. P . M. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 2169

    2014

  32. [40]

    E., Meyer, M

    Mamajek, E. E., Meyer, M. R., & Liebert, J. 2002, AJ, 124, 1670

    2002

  33. [41]

    C., Petit, P ., Jeffers, S

    Marsden, S. C., Petit, P ., Jeffers, S. V ., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 3517

    2014

  34. [42]

    V ., Pignatari, M., Korotin, S

    Mishenina, T. V ., Pignatari, M., Korotin, S. A., et al. 2013, A&A, 552, A128

    2013

  35. [43]

    & Nagai, R

    Miyamoto, M. & Nagai, R. 1975, PASJ, 27, 533

    1975

  36. [44]

    A., Prugniel, P ., & Soubiran, C

    Moultaka, J., Ilovaisky, S. A., Prugniel, P ., & Soubiran, C. 2004, PASP , 116, 693

    2004

  37. [45]

    J., Mamajek, E

    Murphy, S. J., Mamajek, E. E., & Bell, C. P . M. 2018, MNRAS, 476 , 3290

    2018

  38. [46]

    2001, ApJ, 550, 944

    Muzerolle, J., Calvet, N., & Hartmann, L. 2001, ApJ, 550, 944

    2001

  39. [47]

    Pecaut, M. J. & Mamajek, E. E. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 794

    2016

  40. [48]

    E., Kupka, F., Ryabchikova, T

    Piskunov, N. E., Kupka, F., Ryabchikova, T. A., Weiss, W. W., & Jeffery, C. S. 1995, A&AS, 112, 525

    1995

  41. [49]

    Potravnov, I. S. & Grinin, V . P . 2013, Astronomy Letters, 39,776

    2013

  42. [50]

    S., Grinin, V

    Potravnov, I. S., Grinin, V . P ., & Ilyin, I. V . 2013, Astrophysics, 56, 453

    2013

  43. [51]

    S., Mkrtichian, D

    Potravnov, I. S., Mkrtichian, D. E., Grinin, V . P ., Ilyin, I. V ., & Shakhovskoy, D. N. 2017, A&A, 599, A60

    2017

  44. [52]

    M., Kastner, J

    Punzi, K. M., Kastner, J. H., Melis, C., et al. 2018, AJ, 155, 3 3

    2018

  45. [53]

    Rei, A. C. S., Petrov, P . P ., & Gameiro, J. F. 2018, A&A, 610, A40

    2018

  46. [54]

    H., Grinin, V ., Shakhovsky, D., & Natta, A

    Rodgers, B., Wooden, D. H., Grinin, V ., Shakhovsky, D., & Natta, A. 2002, ApJ, 564, 405

    2002

  47. [55]

    Lovelace, R. V . E. 2018, New A, 62, 94

    2018

  48. [56]

    M., Ustyugova, G

    Romanova, M. M., Ustyugova, G. V ., Koldoba, A. V ., & Lovelace, R. V . E. 2004, ApJ, 616, L151

    2004

  49. [57]

    L., et al

    Ryabchikova, T., Piskunov, N., Kurucz, R. L., et al. 2015, Ph ys. Scr, 90, 054005

    2015

  50. [58]

    N., Grinin, V

    Shakhovskoi, D. N., Grinin, V . P ., & Rostopchina, A. N. 2003, Astronomy Re- ports, 47, 580

    2003

  51. [59]

    L., Allers, K

    Shkolnik, E. L., Allers, K. N., Kraus, A. L., Liu, M. C., & Flag g, L. 2017, AJ, 154, 69

    2017

  52. [60]

    Shulman, S. G. 2017, Astrophysics, 60, 188

    2017

  53. [61]

    Stempels, H. C. & Piskunov, N. 2003, A&A, 408, 693

    2003

  54. [62]

    2013, A&A, 560, A37

    Tkachenko, A., V an Reeth, T., Tsymbal, V ., et al. 2013, A&A, 560, A37

    2013

  55. [63]

    1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conf erence Series, V ol

    Tsymbal, V . 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conf erence Series, V ol. 108, M.A.S.S., Model Atmospheres and Spectrum Synthes is, ed. S. J

    1996

  56. [64]

    Williams, J. P . & Cieza, L. A. 2011, ARA&A, 49, 67

    2011

  57. [65]

    Zajtseva, G. V . 1985, Peremennye Zvezdy, 22, 181

    1985

  58. [66]

    2015, ApJ, 798, 86

    Zuckerman, B. 2015, ApJ, 798, 86

    2015

  59. [67]

    city l ight

    Zuckerman, B. & Song, I. 2004, ARA&A, 42, 685 Article number, page 8 of 10 Potravnov et al.: Appendix A: Observed H αand Na i 5889 Å profiles Article number, page 9 of 10 A&A proofs: manuscript no. AA201935492_final 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 2013 Oct. 21 Hα 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 2013 No...

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.