Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 36 references

On Poisson-exponential-Tweedie models for ultra-overdispersed data

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper introduces the Poisson-exponential-Tweedie (PET) family, a hierarchical mixture model with variance $m+m^2+\phi m^p$, and argues it unifies geometric versions of several standard count distributions for ultra-overdispersed data.

desk verdict The PET variance model is real and the paper has some useful index ideas, but the advertised equivalence to geometric sums of Poisson-Tweedie variables is false. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08764 v1 pith:OX5WWZYY submitted 2019-08-23 stat.ME

Rahma Abid , Celestin C. Kokonendji , Afif Masmoudi This is my paper · ORCID
classification stat.ME MSC 62J1262F1062E15
keywords Poisson-exponential-Tweedieultra-overdispersiongeometricsumsTweediepowerparameterdispersionindexzero-inflationcountregressionestimatingfunctions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Count data in insurance, reliability, and maintenance often show far more variability than the Poisson model allows. This paper proposes the Poisson-exponential-Tweedie (PET) family, built as a double mixture: the count is Poisson with a random rate, and that rate is itself Tweedie with mean scaled by an exponential random variable. The result is a three-parameter model whose variance is $m+m^2+\phi m^p$, making it naturally ultra-overdispersed. The paper shows the same family arises as geometric sums of Poisson-Tweedie variables, so it includes geometric versions of Hermite, Neyman Type A, P\'olya-Aeppli, negative binomial, and Poisson-inverse Gaussian distributions, and it introduces new dispersion and zero-inflation indexes relative to the zero-shifted geometric distribution. If correct, PET provides a unified, data-adaptive modeling framework for counts that are far more variable than their mean.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the hierarchical mixture in (2.1), together with the geometric-sum equivalence in Proposition 2.1. The mixture writes the latent rate as a Tweedie variable with mean $Xm$ and dispersion $X^{1-p}\phi$, where $X\sim\mathrm{Exp}(1)$; the proposition identifies this distribution with the geometric sum $Y=\sum_{\ell=1}^G \mathrm{PT}_\ell$, where $G$ is geometric. The variance identity $\mathrm{Var}(Y)=m+m^2+\phi m^p$ follows from $\mathbb{E}Z+\mathrm{Var}Z$. This machinery transfers the entire Poisson-Tweedie catalogue into geometric versions and drives estimation: the quasi-score and Pearson estimating functions in Section 3 are built on the variance function $V_i=m_i+m_i^2+\phi m_i^p$.

What would settle it

Simulate from the geometric-sum representation (1.1) for a fixed PT component, such as Poisson-inverse Gaussian with $p=3$, and compare the empirical probability mass function with the double integral (2.3) evaluated by Monte Carlo or Gauss-Laguerre methods for the same parameters. A systematic mismatch would show that the exponential-mixture and geometric-sum representations are not the same distribution, undercutting the interpretation of PET as geometric versions of PT models.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the PET family, defined by $Y\mid Z\sim\mathrm{Poisson}(Z)$, $Z\sim\mathrm{Tw}_p(Xm,X^{1-p}\phi)$, $X\sim\mathrm{Exp}(1)$, and equivalently by a geometric sum of independent Poisson-Tweedie variables, has the mean-variance relationship $\mathrm{Var}(Y)=m+m^2+\phi m^p$ with $m=\mathbb{E}Y$. Proposition 2.1 establishes equality of the two distributional representations, and the variance decomposition gives $\mathrm{Var}(Y)=\mathbb{E}Z+\mathrm{Var}Z=m+m^2+\phi m^p$. When the power parameter $p$ is estimated from data, the model automatically selects among special cases, and the new $G_0$-dispersion and $G_0$-zero-inflation indexes, defined against the zero-shifted geometric distribution, provide a relative measure suited to ultra-overdispersed data. The paper further argues that an estimating-function approach yields consistent, asymptotically normal estimates, and that applications to automobile accidents and building maintenance show PET fits competitively with or better than Poisson-Tweedie while typically requiring a smaller dispersion parameter.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's interpretation as geometric versions of known models rests on an equivalence between the exponential-mixture and geometric-sum representations that is imported from a previous paper rather than proved here.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The PET family unifies geometric versions of Hermite, Neyman Type A, P\'olya-Aeppli, negative binomial, and Poisson-inverse Gaussian distributions under one three-parameter model.
  • Estimating $p$ functions as automatic distribution selection, so the fitted model indicates which special case best describes the data without fitting each candidate separately.
  • The new $G_0$-dispersion and $G_0$-zero-inflation indexes provide a meaningful relative measure when the classical Poisson-based indexes become uninformatively large.
  • PET regression models can handle $G_0$-underdispersed data by allowing negative dispersion parameters, extending beyond the Poisson-Tweedie framework.
  • The estimating-function approach yields consistent and asymptotically normal estimators, as supported by simulation studies across sample sizes.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The $G_0$-dispersion index could be applied as a general diagnostic to any count model, not just PET; the paper develops it only for the PET family.
  • Because geometric sums arise naturally in queueing and reliability theory, PET may give a probabilistic interpretation for data where the counting process is a stream of batches with geometric inter-arrival times; the paper notes this connection but does not exploit it.
  • A natural testable extension is to compare PET with Poisson-Tweedie on out-of-sample predictive intervals for heavy-tailed counts; the paper's applications suggest PET may require a smaller dispersion parameter, which could matter for prediction variance.
  • The negative-$\phi$ regime is only justified under second-moment estimating equations; the paper explicitly notes that the density does not exist for $\phi<0$, so full-likelihood inference for $G_0$-underdispersion would require a different model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a new class of Poisson-exponential-Tweedie (PET) models for ultra-overdispersed count data, defined hierarchically by Y|Z ~ Poisson(Z), Z ~ Tw_p(Xm, X^{1-p}φ), and X ~ Exp(1). The authors derive the mean-variance relationship Var(Y)=m+m^2+φm^p, claim that this model is equivalent to a geometric sum of Poisson-Tweedie random variables, and use this equivalence to name special cases such as geometric Hermite and geometric Neyman Type A. The paper introduces G0-dispersion and G0-zero-inflation indexes relative to the zero-shifted geometric distribution, proposes an estimating-function approach for regression inference, presents a simulation study, and analyzes three real count datasets comparing PET with Poisson-Tweedie models.

Significance. The paper contains a useful and nontrivial modelling idea: a three-parameter variance model with an extra quadratic term, estimated through an estimating-function framework, could be valuable for ultra-overdispersed count data. The derivation of the variance formula from the hierarchical mixture is straightforward and correct, and the proposed G0-based dispersion and zero-inflation indexes are a sensible contribution. The simulation results, although only summarized, support the bias-reduction claims of the estimating-function approach. However, the paper's headline claim that the hierarchical model is equivalent to a geometric sum of Poisson-Tweedie variables is false as stated, and this error undermines the naming and interpretation of the special cases throughout the paper. The mixture model itself and the estimating-function methodology remain salvageable, but the paper needs a substantial reframing.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.1, Eq. (1.1)-(1.2)] The claimed equivalence between the geometric sum representation (1.1) and the variance formula (1.2) is incorrect. For Y=Σ_{l=1}^G PT_l with P(G=g)=q(1-q)^{g-1}, q∈(0,1], and PT_i iid with mean μ and variance μ+ψμ^p, Wald's equations give Var(Y)=m+ψq^{p-1}m^p+(1-q)m^2, where m=E(Y)=μ/q. Matching the claimed m+m^2+φm^p requires q=0, which is outside the stated geometric parameter space. No reparameterization of the geometric law fixes this because no proper geometric distribution satisfies Var(G)=E(G)^2. Therefore the PET model defined by (2.1) is not a geometric sum of Poisson-Tweedie variables in the sense of (1.1), and the names 'geometric Hermite', 'geometric Neyman Type A', 'geometric Pólya-Aeppli', and 'geometric Poisson-inverse Gaussian' are not justified by the model definition.
  2. [Section 2.1, Proposition 2.1] The proof of Proposition 2.1(i) merely restates that the two hierarchical formulations (2.1) and (2.2) are the same model; it does not connect either representation to the geometric sum (1.1). The assertion that the geometric-sum representation collapses to an exponential mixture is imported from Abid et al. (2019a) without stating or proving the relevant proposition. Since the variance calculation above shows that the equivalence fails for the geometric law used in the paper, Proposition 2.1 must be replaced by an honest statement of what is actually proved: the variance of the mixture model in (2.1) and a clear statement that the geometric-sum interpretation is not established.
  3. [Section 2.1 and Table 1] The inclusion of p=0 as the 'geometric Hermite' case is not supported by the model definition, which explicitly requires p≥1 so that the Tweedie intensity Z is nonnegative. The Tweedie family at p=0 is the normal distribution, which has negative support and therefore cannot serve as a Poisson mean. No limiting argument is provided for the p=0 case, and it is used in Table 1 and in the simulation description. The authors should either supply a careful limiting derivation or remove p=0 from the model class and the table.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3.1, Eq. (3.5) and following paragraph] The symbol Sγjk is used both for the within-γ sensitivity matrix and, a few lines later, for the cross-sensitivity E[∂ψγj/∂βk]; this overloaded notation is confusing and should be changed, for example to Sγβ.
  2. [Section 2.2, Eq. (2.4)] The definition P-ZI = EY + log P(Y=0) is nonstandard and can be negative with no clear upper bound; since the paper later compares this index across datasets, the authors should either justify this scale or relate it to the familiar definition 1 + log P(Y=0)/EY.
  3. [Table 2] The observed-frequency column uses '+' signs in an undefined way, and the chi-square statistic is reported for grouped cells; the table should clarify how the cells were grouped or aggregated before computing the chi-square statistic.
  4. [Section 4.3] The reparametrization φ=exp(δ) is mentioned as a numerical stabilization device, but no details are given about how it is incorporated into the estimating-function algorithm or how the standard error of φ is recovered.
  5. [References and citations] The in-text citation '(Abid et al. 2018a, Proposition 2.4)' on page 4 does not match the reference list, which lists Abid et al. (2019a); this should be corrected for consistency.
  6. [Throughout] There are typographical errors such as 'sse, e.g., Kalashnikov' and 'Yeoeman' that should be corrected in a final revision.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Central geometric-sum equivalence is imported from a self-citation; the variance and estimation content are otherwise self-contained.

  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract; Section 2.1, Eqs. (1.1), (2.1), (2.2), Proposition 2.1]
    "Abstract: "The proposed model is equivalent to the exponential-Poisson-Tweedie models arising from geometric sums of Poisson-Tweedie random variables." Section 2.1: "The geometric versions (1.1) of PT class collapses to an exponential mixture representation (Abid et al. 2018a, Proposition 2.4) that is expressed as X∼ Exp(1), [Y|X]|Z∼ Poisson(Z) and Z∼ Twp(Xm, X1−pφ).""

    The paper's strongest claim—that PET equals a geometric sum of Poisson-Tweedie variables—is not proved in this paper. Proposition 2.1 only shows that (2.1) and (2.2) give the same distribution, but (2.2) is just the same exponential mixture rewritten; it is not the geometric-sum representation (1.1). The bridge from (1.1) to (2.2) is a cited proposition from the authors' own prior work (Abid et al. 2019a), which is not reproduced, proved, or independently verified here. The subsequent naming of special cases (geometric Hermite, geometric Neyman Type A, etc.) depends entirely on that bridge.

full rationale

The definition of PET via (2.1) and the derivation of its mean-variance relation (1.2) are self-contained: Proposition 2.1(ii) uses the law of total variance and does not presuppose (1.2). The estimating-function estimation and the applications fit the model to data after the model is defined, so there is no fitted parameter being relabeled as a prediction. The only circular element is the abstract's identification of the PET mixture with geometric sums of Poisson-Tweedie variables (1.1). That identification is not derived in this paper: Proposition 2.1 merely rewrites (2.1) as (2.2), which is the same exponential mixture, and the bridge from (1.1) to (2.2) is a proposition from the authors' own prior paper (Abid et al. 2019a). Indeed, a direct variance calculation for the paper's own geometric law P(G=g)=q(1−q)^{g−1} gives Var(Y)=m+φq^{p−1}m^p+(1−q)m^2, which matches (1.2) only in the q→0 limit, showing that the claimed equivalence is a substantive theorem rather than a definitional identity. All of the 'geometric version' names and the claim that PET arises from geometric sums therefore stand or fall with the cited proposition, which is not independently verified here. Because the variance formula, estimation algorithm, and data comparisons retain independent content, the overall circularity is moderate rather than total.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the variance derivation (which is self-contained) and on the cited geometric-sum equivalence. The model parameters phi, p, and beta are fitted to data and are part of the proposed model, not hidden assumptions. The main unverified input is the equivalence to geometric sums, which comes from a self-cited proposition.

free parameters (3)
  • Dispersion parameter phi = 0.050 (Swiss data), 0.529 (Tunisia), 0.291 (Buildings 1982), 2.75e-7 (Buildings 1983)
    Fitted to data via the Pearson estimating function; central to the variance function.
  • Tweedie power p = 1.950 (Swiss), 2.840 (Tunisia), 1.420 (Buildings 1982), 3.361 (Buildings 1983)
    Fitted to data; the paper claims it acts as an automatic distribution selector.
  • Regression coefficients beta = Various, e.g., intercept 0.267, car age 0.105 (Tunisia)
    Fitted via the quasi-score estimating function in the regression applications.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Tweedie distribution exists with mean mu and variance phi mu^p for p >= 1 and valid phi.
    Used to define Z in the hierarchical model (2.1). Standard result from Tweedie dispersion models.
  • standard math Poisson-Tweedie distribution is the Poisson mixture of Tweedie, with no closed-form pmf except special cases.
    Used to write the double integral for P(Y=y) in (2.3).
  • domain assumption The exponential mixture in (2.1) is equivalent to the geometric sum in (1.1), per Abid et al. (2019a, Prop 2.4).
    This equivalence gives the PET model its interpretation as geometric versions of PT models. The proof is cited, not reproduced in this paper, so the assumption is load-bearing.
  • domain assumption The estimating function approach of Jorgensen and Knudsen (2004) yields consistent and asymptotically normal estimators under second-moment assumptions.
    Basis for the inference in Section 3.1; no formal verification is provided for the PET setting.
  • domain assumption The log link mi = exp(x_i^T beta) is appropriate for count means.
    Standard GLM assumption, stated in equation (3.1).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On Poisson-exponential-Tweedie models for ultra-overdispersed data." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OX5WWZYY

@misc{pith2026190808764,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On Poisson-exponential-Tweedie models for ultra-overdispersed data},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OX5WWZYY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08764}
}
abstract

We introduce a new class of Poisson-exponential-Tweedie (PET) mixture in the framework of generalized linear models for ultra-overdispersed count data. The mean-variance relationship is of the form $m+m^{2}+\phi m^{p}$, where $\phi$ and $p$ are the dispersion and Tweedie power parameters, respectively. The proposed model is equivalent to the exponential-Poisson-Tweedie models arising from geometric sums of Poisson-Tweedie random variables. In this respect, the PET models encompass the geometric versions of Hermite, Neyman Type A, P\'{o}lya-Aeppli, negative binomial and Poisson inverse Gaussian models. The algorithms we shall propose allow us to estimate the real power parameter, which works as an automatic distribution selection. Instead of the classical Poisson, zero-shifted geometric is presented as the reference count distribution. Practical properties are incorporated into the PET of new relative indexes of dispersion and zero-inflation phenomena. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed model highlights unbiased and consistent estimators for large samples. Illustrative practical applications are analyzed on count datasets; in particular, PET models for data without covariates and PET regression models. The PET models are compared to Poisson-Tweedie models showing that parameters of both models are adopted to data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.08764 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Dispersion indexes for PET distribution as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. zero-inflation indexes for PET distribution as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Dispersion indexes for PET distribution as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Average bias and confidence intervals for di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abid, R., Kokonendji, C.C., Masmoudi, A.: Geometric dispersion models with quadratic v-functions. Statist. Probab. Lett. 145, 197-204 (2019a)

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    AStA Adv

    Abid, R., Kokonendji, C.C., Masmoudi, A.: Geometric Tweedie regression models for continuous and semicontinuous data with variation phenomenon. AStA Adv. in Statist. Anal. (2019b) DOI : 10.1007/s10182-019-00350-8

    doi:10.1007/s10182-019-00350-8 2019

  3. [3]

    Akantziliotou, C., Rigby, R.A., Stasinopoulos, D.M.: A framework for mod- elling overdispersed count data, including the Poisson-shifted generalized in- verse Gaussian distribution. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 53, 381-393 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Aryuyuen, S., Bodhisuwan, W.: The negative binomial-generalized exponen- tial (NB-GE) distribution. Appl. Math. Sci. 7, 1093-1105 (2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Bonat, W.H., Jørgensen, B., Kokonendji, C.C., Hinde, J., Dem ´etrio, C.G.B.: Extended Poisson-Tweedie: properties and regression models for count data. Statist. Model. 18, 24-49 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    del Castillo, J., P ´erez-Casany, M.: Overdispersed and underdispersed Poisson generalizations. J. Statist. Plan. Infer. 134, 486-500 (2005)

    work page 2005

  7. [7]

    version 2.1.7

    Dunn, P .K.: Tweedie exponential family models. version 2.1.7. R package URL http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/tweedie/tweedie (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Biometrics 49, 269-279 (1993) 19

    Engel, B., te Brake, J.: Analysis of embryonic development with a model for under- or overdispersion relative to binomial variation. Biometrics 49, 269-279 (1993) 19

    work page 1993

Show all 36 references
  1. [9]

    Fisher, R.A.: The e ffects of methods of ascertainment upon the estimation of frequencies. Ann. Eug. 6, 13-25 (1934)

    1934

  2. [10]

    AStA Adv

    Gupta, R.C., Sim, S.Z., Ong, S.H.: Analysis of discrete data by Conway- Maxwell Poisson distribution. AStA Adv. in Statist. Anal. 4, 327343 (2014)

    2014

  3. [11]

    R package URL https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=hermite (2015)

    Higueras M., Moria D., Oliveira M., Puig P .: her- mite: Generalized Hermite Distribution. R package URL https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=hermite (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    Asso- ciacao Brasileira de Estatistica, Sao Paulo (1998)

    Hinde, J., Dem ´etrio, C.G.B.: Overdispersion: Models and Estimation. Asso- ciacao Brasileira de Estatistica, Sao Paulo (1998)

    1998

  5. [13]

    Biometrics 53, 1225-1238 (1997)

    Hougaard, P ., Lee, M-L.T., Whitmore, G.A.: Analysis of overdispersed count data by mixtures of Poisson variables and Poisson processes. Biometrics 53, 1225-1238 (1997)

    1997

  6. [14]

    Iw `ınska, M., Szymkowiak, M.: Characterizations of distributions through selected functions of reliability theory. Commun. Statist. Theo. Meth. 46, 69-74 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    Chapman and Hall, London (1997)

    Jørgensen, B.: The Theory of Dispersion Models. Chapman and Hall, London (1997)

    1997

  8. [16]

    Jørgensen, B., Knudsen, S.J.: Parameter orthogonality and bias adjustment for estimating functions. Scand. J. Statist. 31, 93-114 (2004)

    2004

  9. [17]

    Jørgensen, B., Kokonendji, C.C.: Dispersion models for geometric sums. Braz. J. Probab. Statist. 25, 263-293 (2011)

    2011

  10. [18]

    AStA Adv

    Jørgensen, B., Kokonendji, C.C.: Discrete dispersion models and their Tweedie asymptotics. AStA Adv. in Statist. Anal. 100, 43-78 (2016)

    2016

  11. [19]

    Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1997)

    Kalashnikov, V .: Geometric Sums: Bounds for Rare Events with Applications. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (1997)

    1997

  12. [20]

    In The Wiley Ency- clopedia of Clinical Trials - Methods and Applications of Statistics in Clinical Trials, pages 506-526 (Chapter

    Kokonendji, C.C.: Over- and underdispersion models. In The Wiley Ency- clopedia of Clinical Trials - Methods and Applications of Statistics in Clinical Trials, pages 506-526 (Chapter. 30). Wiley, New York (2014)

    2014

  13. [21]

    Kokonendji, C.C., Dem ´etrio, C.G.B., Zocchi, S.S.: On Hinde-Dem ´etrio re- gression models for overdispersed count data. Statist. Meth. 4, 271-291 (2007)

    2007

  14. [22]

    Kokonendji, C.C., Dossou-Gbete, S., Dem ´etrio, C.G.B.: Some discrete ex- ponential dispersion models: Poisson-Tweedie and Hinde-Demetrio classes. Statist. Oper. Res. Trans. 28, 201-214 (2004)

    2004

  15. [23]

    Kokonendji, C.C., Puig, P .: Fisher dispersion index for multivariate count distributions : A review and a new proposal. J. Mult. Anal. 165, 180-193 (2018) 20

    2018

  16. [24]

    Wiley, Hoboken (2004)

    Klugman, S.A., Panger, H.H., Willmot, G.E.: Loss Models: From Data to Decisions. Wiley, Hoboken (2004)

    2004

  17. [25]

    Chapman and Hall, London (1989)

    McCullagh, P ., Nelder, J.: Generalized linear models, 2nd edition. Chapman and Hall, London (1989)

    1989

  18. [26]

    Miz `ere, D., Kokonendji, C.C., Dossou-Gb ´et´e, S.: Quelques tests de la loi de Poisson contre des alternatives g ´en´erales bas ´es sur l’indice de dispersion de Fisher. Rev. Statist. Appliq. 54, 61-84 (2006)

    2006

  19. [27]

    Petterle, R.R., Bonat, W.H., Kokonendji, C.C., Seganfredo, J.C., Moraes, A., Gomes da Silva, M.M.: Double Poisson-Tweedie regression models. Int. J. Biostatist. 15, DOI :10.1515/ijb-2018-0119 (2019)

    2019 doi

  20. [28]

    Puig, P ., Valero, J.: Count data distributions: some characterizations with applications. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 101, 332-340 (2006)

    2006

  21. [29]

    R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna (2018)

    R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna (2018)

    2018

  22. [30]

    Sellers, K.F., Raim, A.: A flexible zero-inflated model to address data disper- sion. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 99, 68-80 (2016)

    2016

  23. [31]

    Shanthikumar, J.G.: DFR property o ffirst passage times and its preservation under geometric compounding. Ann. Probab. 16, 397-406 (1988)

    1988

  24. [32]

    In Statistics: Applications and New Directions

    Tweedie, M.C.K.: An index which distinguishes between some important exponential families. In Statistics: Applications and New Directions. Proceedings of the Indian Statistical Institute Golden Jubilee International Conference (J. K. Ghosh and J. Roy, eds.), pages 579-604. Ind...

    1984

  25. [33]

    Wang, Z.: One mixed negative binomial distribution with application. J. Statist. Plan. Infer. 141, 1153-1160 (2011)

    2011

  26. [34]

    Wiley, Hoboken (2018)

    Weiss, C.H.: An Introduction to Discrete-Valued Time Series. Wiley, Hoboken (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    University of Missouri-Rolla, United States (1987)

    Yeoeman, A.: Forecasting Building Maintenance Using The Weibull Process (M.S.Thesis). University of Missouri-Rolla, United States (1987)

    1987

  28. [36]

    Zhu, R., Joe, H.: Modelling heavy-tailed count data using a generalized Poisson-inverse Gaussian family. Statist. Probab. Lett. 70, 1695-1703 (2009) 21

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.