Large KAM tori for quasi-linear perturbations of KdV

Massimiliano Berti; Riccardo Montalto; Thomas Kappeler

REVIEW 1 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Large KAM tori for quasi-linear perturbations of KdV

T0 review · 1 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Multi-solitons of any size survive strong KdV perturbations.

desk verdict First arbitrary-size KAM theorem for quasi-linear KdV perturbations; proof is sound but leans heavily on a companion paper that must be treated as part of the manuscript. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08768 v2 pith:MVRS42XZ submitted 2019-08-23 math.AP math.DS

Massimiliano Berti , Thomas Kappeler , Riccardo Montalto This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.APmath.DS MSC 37K5535Q5337K10

keywords KdVequationKAMtheoryforPDEsquasi-linearperturbationsfinite-gapsolutionsperiodicmulti-solitonsBirkhoffcoordinatesNash-Moseriterationpseudo-differentialoperators

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that the periodic multi-soliton solutions of the KdV equation $\partial_t u = -\partial_x^3 u + 6u\partial_x u$ -- solutions of arbitrary size -- survive as linearly stable quasi-periodic tori when the equation is perturbed by any smooth, sufficiently small, quasi-linear Hamiltonian term. Such perturbations are 'strongly nonlinear': they contain the same third-order derivative as the unperturbed equation, so earlier KAM methods that handled only semilinear perturbations did not apply. The result holds for almost every amplitude parameter in the finite-gap family, in the sense that the exceptional set has measure tending to zero with the perturbation strength. The proof combines a Nash-Moser iteration with a multi-step reduction of the linearized operator to a constant-coefficient operator of order three, using pseudo-differential calculus and canonical coordinates adapted to the unperturbed tori.

What carries the argument

The machinery centers on the canonical chart $\Psi_\nu$ of [19]: a symplectic diffeomorphism $(\theta,y,w)\mapsto q$ near a compact family of $S_+$-gap potentials for which $q(\theta,\nu+y,0)$ is the finite-gap potential, $w=0$ describes the torus, and expansions (3.5)-(3.6) express the chart and its transpose as $w+\sum_{k=1}^M a_{-k}\partial_x^{-k}w$ plus remainders of arbitrary negative order satisfying tame estimates in positive and negative Sobolev spaces. Using that chart, the paper derives a pseudo-differential expansion of the linearized Hamiltonian operator $L_\omega$, then reduces it in four stages: a quasi-periodic time reparametrization makes the top-order coefficient satisfy a normalization condition; the transport flow of a first-order vector field, together with a quantitative Egorov theorem, eliminates the $(\phi,x)$-dependence of the top coefficient; two further symplectic conjugations remove the $x$- and $\phi$-dependence of the first-order coefficient; and a KAM reducibility iteration diagonalizes the remaining order-zero part for most parameters. This almost-invertibility is then inserted into a Nash-Moser scheme to construct the torus embeddings.

What would settle it

Evaluate expansion (3.5) for a large-amplitude one- or two-gap KdV potential and check whether the equality $a^{\Psi\top}_{-1}=-a^\Psi_{-1}$ in (3.7) and the negative-Sobolev remainder bounds of Corollaries 3.3-3.4 hold; an explicit failure at this order would block the reduction. A numerical test of the top-order coefficient after the transport-flow conjugation, checking whether it becomes the constant $m_3=-1+O(\varepsilon)$ as claimed in Lemma 6.5, would likewise settle the reducibility mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Theorem 1.1. For any $f\in C^\infty(\mathbb{T}^1\times\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{R})$ and any finite set $S_+$ of excited modes, there is $\bar s> (|S_+|+1)/2$ and $\varepsilon_0>0$ such that for $0<\varepsilon<\varepsilon_0$ there is a measurable set $\Xi_\varepsilon\subset\Xi$ with $|\Xi\setminus\Xi_\varepsilon|\to 0$, and for each $\nu\in\Xi_\varepsilon$ a quasi-periodic solution $u_\varepsilon(\omega_\varepsilon(\nu)t,x;\nu)$ of $\partial_t u=\partial_x\nabla H_\varepsilon(u)$ whose Sobolev distance to the finite-gap solution $q(\cdot,\cdot;\nu)$ tends to zero as $\varepsilon\to 0$, with frequency vector $\omega_\varepsilon(\nu)\to -\omega^{\rm kdv}(\nu)$; the torus is linearly stable. The decisive point is that the size of the finite-gap torus is not assumed small and the perturbation is quasi-linear, meaning its Hamiltonian density may depend on $u_x$, so the perturbing vector field contains $\partial_x^3$ terms of the same order as the unperturbed one.

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes from the companion paper [19] that the canonical coordinates near any compact family of $S_+$-gap potentials satisfy the pseudo-differential expansions and tame estimates of Theorem 3.2, Corollaries 3.3 and 3.4; if those expansions or their negative-Sobolev extensions fail, the reduction of the linearized operator and the Nash-Moser construction collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For any finite set of excited modes and any smooth quasi-linear Hamiltonian perturbation that is small, the perturbed equation admits quasi-periodic invariant tori for a set of amplitude parameters whose complement has measure tending to zero with the perturbation size.
These tori are linearly stable, so the finite-gap KdV solutions are not merely shadowed but persist in a linearly stable sense.
The theorem supplies the first existence result for quasi-periodic solutions of arbitrary size under strongly nonlinear perturbations of an integrable PDE, removing the small-amplitude barrier that limited earlier KAM theorems.
The authors expect the same method to extend to equations in the KdV hierarchy and to defocusing NLS and mKdV; if that expectation is borne out, large finite-gap tori persist in those models as well.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because the obstruction to the proof is concentrated in the imported normal-form chart, testing that chart numerically for one nontrivial large two-gap potential would give a cheap indicator of the theorem's reach; the KAM and Nash-Moser estimates themselves are self-contained here.
A testable extension would be to repeat the reduction with nonzero mean $c$ or with only $C^{s_*}$ density $f$; the authors note the argument is written for $c=0$ and $f\in C^\infty$ just for simplicity, so the same proof should carry the theorem to those cases with only notational changes.
If the companion normal-form chart is established for the defocusing NLS hierarchy, the same four-stage reduction may transfer, suggesting that the main structural requirement is a normal-form coordinate system with pseudo-differential expansion, not the specific KdV dispersion.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Colleague—this paper is the first large-KAM-tori result for quasi-linear perturbations of an integrable PDE. That is a genuine threshold. The theorem: for any smooth Hamiltonian perturbation with f(x,u,ux), finite-gap tori of arbitrary size persist for most parameters, with linear stability. The proof is a Nash-Moser scheme with pseudo-differential reduction of the linearized operator, Egorov theorems, and a KAM reducibility step. It is carefully written and, as far as I can tell, internally coherent.

What's new: previous quasi-linear results (Baldi–Berti–Montalto) were small-amplitude only; semilinear KAM for finite-gap tori went back to Kuksin and Kappeler–Pöschel. Here they get arbitrary size. The technical work is substantial: they prove novel extensions of the differential of the canonical map to negative Sobolev spaces (Corollaries 3.3–3.4) and get quantitative Egorov theorems for transport flows. The reduced operator has a leading constant coefficient and the KAM reducibility yields Melnikov non-resonance conditions with the right measure estimates.

The soft spot is structural rather than a flaw: the entire construction sits on Theorem 3.2, imported from the companion Kappeler–Montalto paper [19]. That theorem gives the canonical chart with pseudo-differential expansion up to remainders of arbitrary negative order, plus tame estimates. If those expansions or the negative-order extensions were off by a derivative, Lemma 6.3 and the rest of Sections 6–7 would not hold. The authors say so themselves—they are not hiding it—and the stress-test confirms no internal contradiction shows up in this manuscript. But this paper is not self-contained: a referee has to treat [19] as part of the proof. That is a heavy but doable review burden.

The citation pattern looks honest: they cite the semilinear predecessors and the small-amplitude quasi-linear work, and they flag the companion paper clearly. No fitted parameters, no circularity. The claim is what it says.

Who is this for: specialists in KAM theory and Hamiltonian PDEs. It deserves a serious referee, not a desk reject. My recommendation: send it out, but tell the referee to have [19] at hand, and consider a joint referee assignment for both papers. I would likely cite this if I were active in the area.

Referee Report

1 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper proves Theorem 1.1: for any finite subset S+ of positive integers and any Hamiltonian perturbation of KdV of the form ∂t u = ∂x ∇Hε(u) with Hε = Hkdv + εP and P(u) = ∫ f(x,u,ux)dx, f ∈ C∞, there is, for sufficiently small ε, a set of parameters of asymptotically full measure on which the perturbed equation admits a quasi-periodic solution close to the corresponding S+-gap solution of KdV, with frequency close to -ωkdv, and with a linearly stable invariant torus. The proof combines the canonical coordinates of KdV with the pseudo-differential normal-form chart Ψν constructed in the companion paper [19], derives pseudo-differential expansions for the linearized Hamiltonian vector fields, reduces the linearized operator Lω to a constant-coefficient operator of order three up to order-zero remainders, and then applies a KAM reducibility scheme and a Nash-Moser iteration with measure estimates.

Significance. If correct, the theorem resolves a longstanding question: it gives KAM persistence of finite-gap solutions of arbitrary size under genuinely quasi-linear Hamiltonian perturbations, going substantially beyond the earlier semilinear and small-amplitude results. The paper is technically very substantial: it contains detailed tame estimates, a quantitative Egorov theorem for transport flows, a careful reduction of Lω through four changes of variables, a modulo-tame KAM reducibility scheme, and explicit measure estimates based on the non-degeneracy of KdV frequencies. The dependence on the companion paper [19] is stated transparently, and the results of Sections 3.2-8 are largely self-contained once Theorem 3.2 is granted.

major comments (1)

[§3.1, Theorem 3.2] Theorem 3.2 is the load-bearing premise of the entire paper: the pseudo-differential expansions (3.5)-(3.6), the normal-form property (AE3), and the tame estimates (Est1)-(Est2) are imported from the companion paper [19]. Corollaries 3.3 and 3.4, Lemmas 3.5 and 3.7, and through them Lemma 6.3 and the whole reduction in Sections 6-7, all depend on this theorem. The manuscript proves consequences of Theorem 3.2 but not the theorem itself. Because [19] is published, this is a structural dependency rather than an internal inconsistency; nonetheless, the referee cannot verify the central claim from this manuscript alone. The authors should state explicitly which assertions of [19] are being used in exactly what form and confirm that no modification of the remainder orders or tame estimates of [19] is needed, since a change of even one derivative in (3.5)-(3.6) would alter the order of the leading pseudo-differential part of Lω and invalidate the reducibility argument.

minor comments (4)

[§5, after (5.3)] The text contains several typos and small grammatical errors, for example 'noe' after (5.3), 'inveritibility' near (5.22), 'Correpondingly' in Section 2.1, and 'repsectively' in the introduction; these should be corrected.
[§6.2, Eq. (6.20)] The operator Lω^(1) is called a Hamiltonian operator after conjugation by the time reparametrization Φ^(1) and scaling by 1/ρ. Since Φ^(1) is not a symplectic map of the phase space, the manuscript should explicitly justify why the conjugated and scaled operator remains Hamiltonian (for instance by noting that ρ is independent of x and that Φ^(1) commutes with ∂x), because the later KAM scheme uses the Hamiltonian structure to ensure real frequencies and the symmetry properties of the diagonal part.
[§2.2, Lemma 2.6] The proof of Lemma 2.6 uses formal manipulations with the nonlocal operator ∂x^{-1}; the statement would be clearer if it noted that the expansion is an asymptotic pseudo-differential expansion, so that the computation of the leading coefficients is justified in the symbol calculus rather than by exact operator identities.
[§6.1, Lemma 6.3] In the display (6.9), the term Op(r0^(0)) is said to have an expansion (6.11) in homogeneous components, but the remainder after the sum in (6.11) is not shown explicitly; adding the remainder term there would make the statement consistent with the later use of the expansion in the Egorov reductions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reduction: the main theorem is not equivalent to its imported normal-form premise.

full rationale

The claimed derivation chain is not circular. Theorem 1.1 asserts the persistence of S+−gap tori for the quasi-linear Hamiltonian perturbation Hε = Hkdv + εP. The paper explicitly imports the normal-form coordinate theorem as Theorem 3.2 from the companion paper [19], stating: "The proof of Theorem 1.1 uses the canonical coordinates constructed in [19] near any given compact family of S+−gap potentials in MS+. These coordinates admit an expansion in terms of pseudo-diﬀerential operators up to a remainder of arbitrary negative order. Due to its length, this part of the proof of Theorem 1.1 has been published in a separate paper [19]." This is a load-bearing structural dependency, but not a circular one: Theorem 3.2 concerns the unperturbed KdV equation and gives a canonical chart with pseudo-differential expansions and a normal form for Hkdv; its assumptions (finite S+, bounded open Ξ, small δ) do not include the existence of quasi-periodic solutions of the perturbed equation, and its conclusion is not the target result. The subsequent steps are carried out in this manuscript: Corollaries 3.3–3.4 derive negative-Sobolev extensions from Theorem 3.2; Lemmas 3.5 and 3.7 expand the linearized Hamiltonian vector fields using those corollaries; Sections 6.1–6.5 reduce Lω via transport flows, Egorov theorems, and pseudo-differential calculus proved here (Lemmas 2.9–2.12, 2.25, Propositions 2.28 and 2.31); and Section 7 performs the KAM reducibility of the linearized operator. No parameter is fitted to data and then renamed a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is invoked to forbid alternatives, and no quantity used as an input is identical by construction to the claimed output. The frequency non-degeneracy used for measure estimates is imported from [20] and [11] with stated assumptions independent of Theorem 1.1. Under the rule that a published, parameter-free result with assumptions not containing the target result counts as independent support rather than circularity, the reliance on [19] does not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; proof constants are chosen by the argument. The axioms are prior theorems cited with attribution, including one companion paper. No invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)

standard math Global analytic Birkhoff coordinates for KdV on the torus exist (Theorem 3.1, [20]).
Used to identify finite-gap solutions and action-angle coordinates; established in Kappeler-Pöschel, an accepted prior theorem.
domain assumption Normal form coordinate chart Ψν with pseudo-differential expansions exists (Theorem 3.2, [19]).
Imported from the companion paper; supports expansion (3.5), transpose expansion (3.6), normal form (3.8), and estimates (Est1)-(Est2). If it fails, Sections 6 and 7 fail.
standard math Non-degeneracy of KdV frequencies: det(∂_{I_k} ω_j^{kdv}) does not vanish identically and Melnikov non-resonance functions are not identically zero (Lemma 3.9, [20], [11]).
Used to pass from actions to frequency parameters and to control small divisors in the KAM reduction.
standard math KdV frequency asymptotics: ω_n^{kdv}(I,0) - (2πn)^3 = O(n^{-1}) and n ∂_{I_j} ω_n^{kdv}(I,0) = O(1), stated in (3.61).
Used to bound q_j in the diagonal operator and to derive the measure estimates in Section 8.2.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Large KAM tori for quasi-linear perturbations of KdV." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MVRS42XZ

@misc{pith2026190808768,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Large KAM tori for quasi-linear perturbations of KdV},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MVRS42XZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08768}
}

read the original abstract

In this paper we prove the persistence of space periodic multi-solitons of arbitrary size under any quasi-linear Hamiltonian perturbation, which is smooth and sufficiently small. This answers positively a longstanding question whether KAM techniques can be further developed to prove the existence of quasi-periodic solutions of arbitrary size of strongly nonlinear perturbations of integrable PDEs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

A KAM theorem for the Hamiltonian with finite zero normal frequencies and its applications
math.DS 2019-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

For Hamiltonians with a finite number of zero normal frequencies, a KAM-type theorem states that for most frequencies the existence of invariant tori is decided by a single leftover constant, and this yields quasi-per...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[19]

Kappeler, R

T. Kappeler, R. Montalto, Normal form coordinates for the KdV equation having expansi ons in terms of pseudo-diﬀerential operators , Comm. Math Phys. DOI: 10.1007/s00220-019-03498-1, 2019

work page doi:10.1007/s00220-019-03498-1 2019
[1]

Baldi, M

P. Baldi, M. Berti, E. Haus, R. Montalto , Time quasi-periodic gravity water waves in ﬁnite depth, Inventiones Math. 214 (2), 739–911, 2018

work page 2018
[2]

Baldi, M

P. Baldi, M. Berti, R. Montalto , KAM for quasi-linear and fully nonlinear forced perturbati ons of Airy equation , Math. Annalen 359, 471–536, 2014

work page 2014
[3]

Baldi, M

P. Baldi, M. Berti, R. Montalto , KAM for autonomous quasi-linear perturbations of KdV , Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Analyse Non. Lin. 33, no. 6, 1589–1638, 2016

work page 2016
[4]

Baldi, M

P. Baldi, M. Berti, R. Montalto , KAM for autonomous quasi-linear perturbations of mKdV , Bollettino Unione Matematica Italiana, 9, 143–188, 2016

work page 2016
[5]

Bambusi, B

D. Bambusi, B. Gr ´ ebert, A. Maspero, D. Robert , Growth of Sobolev norms for abstract linear Schr¨ odinger Equations. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), in press 2017

work page 2017
[6]

Berti, L

M. Berti, L. Biasco, M. Procesi , KAM theory for the Hamiltonian DNL W , Ann. Sci. ´Ec. Norm. Sup´ er. (4), Vol. 46, fascicule 2, 301–373, 2013

work page 2013
[7]

Berti, L

M. Berti, L. Biasco, M. Procesi , KAM theory for the reversible derivative wave equation , Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 212, 905–955, 2014

work page 2014

Show all 30 references

[8]

Hamiltonian PDEs and Applications

M. Berti, P. Bolle, A Nash-Moser approach to KAM theory , Fields Institute Communications, special volume “Hamiltonian PDEs and Applications”, 255–284, 2015

2015
[9]

Berti, T

M. Berti, T. Kappeler, R. Montalto , Large KAM tori for perturbations of the defocusing NLS equation, Ast´ erisque 403, viii+148 pp., 2018

2018
[10]

Berti, R

M. Berti, R. Montalto , Quasi-periodic standing wave solutions of gravity capilla ry standing water waves, to appear in Memoirs of the Amer. Math. Society, MEMO 891, arXiv:1 602.02411, 2016

2016
[11]

Bikbaev, S

R. Bikbaev, S. Kuksin , On the parametrization of ﬁnite-gap solutions by frequency vector and wave number vectors and a theorem by I. Krichever , Lett. Math. Phys. 28, 115-122, 1993

1993
[12]

Dubrovin, I

B. Dubrovin, I. Krichever, S. Novikov, Integrable Systems I , in Dynamical Systems IV , Encyclo- pedia of Mathematical Sciences vol. 4, V. Arnold, S. Novikov (eds.), 173–280, Springer, 1990

1990
[13]

Eliasson, B

H. Eliasson, B. Gr ´ ebert, S. Kuksin, KAM for the nonlinear beam equation , Geom. Funct. Anal. Vol. 26, 1588–1715, 2016

2016
[14]

Eliasson, S

H. Eliasson, S. Kuksin, KAM for non-linear Schr¨ odinger equation, Annals of Math., 172, 371-435, 2010

2010
[15]

F addeev, L

L. F addeev, L. Takhtajan, Hamiltonian methods in the theory of solitons , Springer-Verlag, 1987

1987
[16]

Feola, M

R. Feola, M. Procesi , Quasi-periodic solutions for fully nonlinear forced rever sible Schr¨ odinger equa- tions, J. Diﬀ. Eq., 259, no. 7, 3389–3447, 2015

2015
[17]

Gardner, J

C. Gardner, J. Greene, M. Kruskal, R. Miura, Korteweg-deVries equation and generalization. VI. Methods for exact solution , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 27, 97–133, 1974

1974
[18]

Giuliani , Quasi-periodic solutions for quasi-linear generalized Kd V equations , J

F. Giuliani , Quasi-periodic solutions for quasi-linear generalized Kd V equations , J. Diﬀerential Equa- tions 262, 10, 5052–5132, 2017

2017
[20]

Kappeler, J

T. Kappeler, J. P ¨oschel, KdV & KAM , Springer-Verlag, 2003. 67

2003
[21]

Kappeler, B

T. Kappeler, B. Schaad, P. Topalov , Qualitative features of periodic solutions of KdV , Comm. Part. Diﬀ. Eqs. 38, (9), 1626–1673, 2013

2013
[22]

Kappeler, B

T. Kappeler, B. Schaad, P. Topalov , Semi-linearity of the nonlinear Fourier transform of the defocusing NLS equation , Int. Math. Res. Notices, 7212–7229, 2016

2016
[23]

Kruskal, N

M. Kruskal, N. Zabusky, Interactions of ‘solitons” in a collisionless plasma and th e recurrence of initial states, Phys.Rev.Lett. 15, 240–243, 1965

1965
[24]

Kuksin , A KAM theorem for equations of the Korteweg-de Vries type , Rev

S. Kuksin , A KAM theorem for equations of the Korteweg-de Vries type , Rev. Math. Phys., 10, 3, 1–64, 1998

1998
[25]

Kuksin , Analysis of Hamiltonian PDEs , Oxford University Press, 2000

S. Kuksin , Analysis of Hamiltonian PDEs , Oxford University Press, 2000

2000
[26]

Kuksin, G

S. Kuksin, G. Perelman , Vey theorem in inﬁnite dimensions and its application to KdV , Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 27, no. 1, 1-24, 2010

2010
[27]

Lax, Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolution and solitary waves, Comm

P. Lax, Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolution and solitary waves, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 21, 467–490, 1968

1968
[28]

J. Liu, X. Yuan , A KAM Theorem for Hamiltonian Partial Diﬀerential Equation s with Unbounded Perturbations, Comm. Math. Phys, 307 (3), 629–673, 2011

2011
[29]

Miura, C

R. Miura, C. Gardner, M. Kruskal, Korteweg-de Vries equation and generalizations. II. Exist ence of conservation laws and constants of motion , J. Mathematical Phys. 9, 1204–1209, 1968

1968
[30]

Zhang, M

J. Zhang, M. Gao, X. Yuan , KAM tori for reversible partial diﬀerential equations , Nonlinearity 24, 1189–1228, 2011. 68

2011

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [19]

Kappeler, R

T. Kappeler, R. Montalto, Normal form coordinates for the KdV equation having expansi ons in terms of pseudo-diﬀerential operators , Comm. Math Phys. DOI: 10.1007/s00220-019-03498-1, 2019

work page doi:10.1007/s00220-019-03498-1 2019

[2] [1]

Baldi, M

P. Baldi, M. Berti, E. Haus, R. Montalto , Time quasi-periodic gravity water waves in ﬁnite depth, Inventiones Math. 214 (2), 739–911, 2018

work page 2018

[3] [2]

Baldi, M

P. Baldi, M. Berti, R. Montalto , KAM for quasi-linear and fully nonlinear forced perturbati ons of Airy equation , Math. Annalen 359, 471–536, 2014

work page 2014

[4] [3]

Baldi, M

P. Baldi, M. Berti, R. Montalto , KAM for autonomous quasi-linear perturbations of KdV , Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Analyse Non. Lin. 33, no. 6, 1589–1638, 2016

work page 2016

[5] [4]

Baldi, M

P. Baldi, M. Berti, R. Montalto , KAM for autonomous quasi-linear perturbations of mKdV , Bollettino Unione Matematica Italiana, 9, 143–188, 2016

work page 2016

[6] [5]

Bambusi, B

D. Bambusi, B. Gr ´ ebert, A. Maspero, D. Robert , Growth of Sobolev norms for abstract linear Schr¨ odinger Equations. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), in press 2017

work page 2017

[7] [6]

Berti, L

M. Berti, L. Biasco, M. Procesi , KAM theory for the Hamiltonian DNL W , Ann. Sci. ´Ec. Norm. Sup´ er. (4), Vol. 46, fascicule 2, 301–373, 2013

work page 2013

[8] [7]

Berti, L

M. Berti, L. Biasco, M. Procesi , KAM theory for the reversible derivative wave equation , Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 212, 905–955, 2014

work page 2014