Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 53 references

On the well-posedness of an anisotropically-reduced two-dimensional Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Changing one linear term in the 2D Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation gives a globally well-posed model that keeps the full nonlinearity.

desk verdict A new anisotropic reduction of the 2D KSE with the full nonlinearity, but the global well-posedness proof as written has a repairable gap in its final H1 estimate. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09239 v2 pith:LMLMKGIC submitted 2019-08-25 math.AP

Adam Larios , Kazuo Yamazaki This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35K2535K5835B6535B1065M70
keywords Kuramoto-Sivashinskyequationglobalwell-posednessanisotropicregularizationmaximumprinciplestrongsolutionsGalerkinapproximationenergyestimatestwo-dimensional
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a reduced two-dimensional Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation (r-KSE) in which only the linear term of the first component is changed, replacing the KSE operator by plain viscosity, while the second component keeps the full KSE operator. The paper claims that this system is globally well-posed: for any initial data in $H^1(\mathbb{T}^2)$ with the first component in $L^\infty$, a unique strong solution exists on any time interval $[0,T]$. If correct, this would be the first two-dimensional KSE-like equation with the full $u\cdot\nabla u$ nonlinearity known to be globally well-posed. The mechanism is a maximum principle for the first component that controls the nonlinear terms, and the paper's simulations show qualitative similarity to the 2D KSE, though not quantitative approximation.

What carries the argument

The central object is the reduced Kuramoto-Sivashinsky system (1.4): the first equation is a viscous Burgers-type equation $\partial_t u_1+(u\cdot\nabla)u_1=\nu\Delta u_1$, while the second retains the KSE linear operator $\partial_t u_2+(u\cdot\nabla)u_2=-\lambda\Delta u_2-\Delta^2 u_2$ on the periodic square $\mathbb{T}^2$. The load-bearing mechanism is the maximum principle for $u_1$ (Proposition 4.2): writing $\varphi=e^{-\alpha t}u_1$, the evolution of $|\varphi|^2$ shows that no positive interior maximum can form, so $\|u_1(t)\|_{L^\infty}\le\|u^{in}_1\|_{L^\infty}$. That $L^\infty$ control is what lets the proof close the energy cascade despite the fact that $\int (u\cdot\nabla)u\cdot u\,dx\neq 0$; it also uses the one-dimensional symmetry $\int u_2\partial_2u_2\,u_2\,dx=0$. Galerkin truncation and compactness supply local existence, and a Gronwall argument on the difference of two solutions supplies uniqueness.

What would settle it

Run a spectrally accurate simulation of the r-KSE with parameters such as $\lambda=5.01$, $\nu=0.5$, starting from smooth data like $u^{in}=\nabla(C(\sin(x+y)+\sin x+\sin y))$ with $\|u^{in}\|_{L^2}=1$, and monitor $\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}$ over long times. If this quantity appears to diverge at a finite time, global well-posedness is false; if it remains bounded in repeated high-resolution runs, the claim survives this test. Independently of numerics, one can check whether the differential inequality in Proposition 4.5 is genuinely quadratic in $\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}$; if so, the written Gronwall step does not prove the needed uniform bound.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 3.2: for any $u^{in}\in H^1(\mathbb{T}^2)$ with $u^{in}_1\in L^\infty(\mathbb{T}^2)$ and any $T>0$, there exists a unique strong solution $u=(u_1,u_2)$ to the r-KSE system $\partial_t u_1+(u\cdot\nabla)u_1=\nu\Delta u_1$, $\partial_t u_2+(u\cdot\nabla)u_2=-\lambda\Delta u_2-\Delta^2 u_2$ on $\mathbb{T}^2$, with $u\in L^\infty([0,T];H^1)$, $u_1\in L^2([0,T];H^2)$, $u_2\in L^2([0,T];H^3)$. The proof proceeds by Galerkin approximation, local existence via Picard-Lindelöf, compactness passage via Aubin-Lions-Simon, and then a cascade of a priori estimates. The decisive estimate is an $L^\infty$ maximum principle for $u_1$ that bounds $\|u_1(t)\|_{L^\infty}$ by $\|u^{in}_1\|_{L^\infty}$; this bound is what allows the non-vanishing nonlinear terms to be controlled, leading to $u_2\in L^\infty L^2\cap L^2H^2$, then $u_1\in L^2H^1$, and finally the uniform $H^1$ estimate for the pair. Uniqueness follows from a Gronwall estimate on the difference of two solutions.

Load-bearing premise

The argument's load-bearing step is the claim that a differential inequality of the form $\frac{d}{dt}\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^2 \le C(1+\|\nabla u\|_{L^2}^2)^2$ can be closed by Gronwall's inequality to give a bound valid for all time. A Gronwall bound from a quadratic right-hand side does not prevent finite-time blow-up, so the uniform $H^1$ estimate required for global existence does not follow from the written calculation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The paper provides a globally well-posed two-dimensional KSE-like system with the full $u\cdot\nabla u$ nonlinearity, which it argues is the first such analogue beyond the 1D KSE.
  • For every $T>0$ and every initial datum in $H^1(\mathbb{T}^2)$ with first component in $L^\infty$, the strong solution is unique and belongs to $L^\infty H^1\cap L^2H^2\times L^2H^3$; by symmetry the same conclusion holds if the roles of the two components are exchanged.
  • The model keeps the main obstacles of the 2D KSE—non-vanishing nonlinearity in $L^2$ energy estimates, low-mode instability, and no full maximum principle—so it isolates the effect of a partial maximum principle on global regularity.
  • Numerical simulations show that r-KSE solutions develop similar length scales, amplitudes, cell-like structures, and quasi-one-dimensional states as 2D KSE solutions, while the $u_2$ energy spectrum is closer to the KSE spectrum than the $u_1$ spectrum is.
  • Nearly identical arguments also cover the alternative nonlinearity $\frac{1}{2}\nabla|u|^2$, so the result is not tied to the specific form of the advection term.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the flagged $H^1$ estimate can be closed by a sharper inequality, the r-KSE would become a practical numerical testbed for 2D KSE phenomenology, since it keeps the full nonlinearity while being globally solvable.
  • The anisotropic splitting suggests a family of partially regularized KSE models in which one component's linear operator is replaced by any dissipative operator that admits a maximum principle; such models could probe which KSE dynamics depend on the full fourth-order linear term.
  • Because the $u_2$ spectrum tracks the KSE more closely than $u_1$ does, diagnostics built from the unmodified component may be more informative than full-field comparisons when using the r-KSE to reason about the KSE.
  • A direct numerical parameter sweep in $\nu$ and $\lambda$ could test whether the regularized component's influence on $u_2$ decreases as $\nu\to 0$; the paper reports a trend in this direction but does not quantify it.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper introduces a two-dimensional 'reduced' Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation (r-KSE) in which the fourth-order dissipation and backward diffusion in the first component are replaced by standard Laplacian diffusion, while the second component retains the structure of the 2D KSE. The authors claim global well-posedness for initial data in H1 with u1 in L∞, prove several a priori estimates, and present numerical simulations comparing the r-KSE with the 2D KSE. The proof is based on Galerkin approximations, a maximum principle for u1, and successive energy estimates.

Significance. If the main theorem were correctly proved, the r-KSE would be a novel example of a 2D equation with the full u·∇u nonlinearity that is globally well-posed, providing a potentially instructive phenomenological model for the 2D KSE. The paper is self-contained, uses standard tools, and the computational part is thoughtfully presented. However, the key H1 estimate in Proposition 4.5 is not valid as written, so the central claim is not established.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4, Proposition 4.5, Eq. (4.64)] The final estimate in Proposition 4.5 has the form (1/2)(d/dt)||∇u||^2 ≤ c(1+||∇u||^2)^2 after the dissipative terms are absorbed. This is a quadratic differential inequality for y(t)=||∇u(t)||^2, and the Gronwall lemma applied to y' ≤ C(1+y)^2 yields a bound that blows up at T* = 1/(C(1+y(0))), so it cannot yield a uniform bound on [0,T] for arbitrary T. The sentence 'relying on Gronwall's inequality complete the proof' is therefore not justified. Propositions 4.2–4.4 provide L∞([0,T];L∞) for u1 and L∞([0,T];L2)∩L2([0,T];H2) for u2, but the proof does not convert the right-hand side into a linear-in-y term with an L1-in-time coefficient. Since Proposition 4.1 requires a uniform H1 bound to extend the local solution to arbitrary T, Theorem 3.2 is not established as written.
  2. [Section 4, Proposition 4.1, Eq. (4.18)-(4.19)] The bound in (4.19), even if corrected, gives a finite-time blow-up estimate for the H1 norm and can only be used for local existence. The paper's global well-posedness claim therefore rests entirely on Proposition 4.5. Since that proposition is not proved, the global existence part of Theorem 3.2 remains unsupported.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 4, Proposition 4.2] In the sentence 'φ =e^{-2αt}u1≡ 0', the exponent should be -αt, consistent with the definition φ=e^{-αt}u1.
  2. [Throughout] There are several typos, e.g., 'prvents' in the introduction, 'condtions' in Section 2, and 'psuedospectral' in Section 5.1, which should be corrected.
  3. [Section 4, Proposition 4.5] The phrase 'relying on Gronwall's inequality complete the proof' should read 'completes the proof'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the r-KSE well-posedness proof is self-contained, with no fitted-input predictions and no load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, global well-posedness of the reduced Kuramoto-Sivashinsky system (1.4), is established through a Galerkin approximation, a priori estimates, compactness arguments, and Gronwall-type inequalities. The model itself is introduced as a new object that modifies the linear part of the 2D KSE in one component; it is not defined in terms of the theorem's conclusion, and no parameter is fitted to data and then relabeled as a prediction. The only self-citation is [31] (Larios-Titi), which is used in the introduction as background on hyperviscous Burgers blow-up and boundary conditions; it is not load-bearing for Proposition 4.1, Proposition 4.5, or Theorem 3.2. The proof relies on standard external theorems (Picard-Lindelöf, Aubin-Lions-Simon) and cites Pooley-Robinson [43] only as methodological inspiration. The computational section explicitly states that the r-KSE solutions are not approximations of KSE solutions, so the qualitative comparisons are not presented as derived predictions. I find no step where a conclusion reduces by construction to its inputs, no self-citation chain that forces the result, and no renaming of a known result as a new one. A separate mathematical concern, not a circularity concern, is that the Gronwall step in Proposition 4.5 appears to apply Gronwall's inequality to a quadratic-in-H1 differential inequality, which does not by itself yield a bound for arbitrary T; this is a correctness risk, not a circularity, and does not affect the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted; nu and lambda are fixed positive parameters of the model. The proof uses standard PDE theorems and the maximum principle. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Picard-Lindelof theorem for Banach spaces (Lemma 2.1)
    Used to obtain local existence of Galerkin approximations in Section 4.
  • standard math Aubin-Lions-Simon compactness theorem (Lemma 2.2)
    Used to extract strongly convergent subsequences from Galerkin approximations.
  • standard math Gagliardo-Nirenberg interpolation inequalities in 2D
    Used in the energy estimates in Propositions 4.1 and 4.5.
  • standard math Sobolev embeddings H2(T2) into L∞(T2) and H1(T2) into L4(T2)
    Used throughout the estimates, e.g., in equations (4.10) to (4.16).
  • standard math Gronwall's inequality
    Used to close differential inequalities; the application in Proposition 4.5 is the point of failure.
  • domain assumption Maximum principle for the scalar advection-diffusion equation satisfied by u1
    Proposition 4.2 relies on the classical maximum principle; applying it to strong solutions requires approximation or additional regularity not fully detailed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the well-posedness of an anisotropically-reduced two-dimensional Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LMLMKGIC

@misc{pith2026190809239,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the well-posedness of an anisotropically-reduced two-dimensional Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LMLMKGIC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09239}
}
abstract

The Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equations (KSE) arise in many diverse scientific areas, and are of much mathematical interest due in part to their chaotic behavior, and their similarity to the Navier-Stokes equations. However, very little is known about their global well-posedness in the 2D case. Moreover, regularizations of the system (e.g., adding large diffusion, etc.) do not seem to help, due to the lack of any control over the $L^2$ norm. In this work, we propose a new "reduced" 2D model that modifies only the linear part of (the vector form of) the 2D KSE in only one component. This new model shares much in common with the 2D KSE: it is 4th-order in space, it has an identical nonlinearity which does not vanish in energy estimates, it has low-mode instability, and it lacks a maximum principle. However, we prove that our reduced model is globally well-posed. We also examine its dynamics computationally. Moreover, while its solutions do not appear to be close approximations of solutions to the KSE, the solutions do seem to hold many qualitative similarities with those of the KSE. We examine these properties via computational simulations comparing solutions of the new model to solutions of the 2D KSE.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.09239 by the authors.

Figure 5.1
Figure 5.1. Error ku(t) − ∇ϕ(t)kL∞ vs. time. λ = 5.01. Resolution: 5122 . (Log-linear plot.) in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.2
Figure 5.2. Plots of the magnitudes of the solutions (p u 2 1 + u 2 2 ) to the KSE (first column), the r-KSE with ν = 0.5 (second column), and r-KSE with ν = 0.05 (third column). For all simulations, λ = 5.01. Times (top to bottom): 0.0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8. 19 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5.3
Figure 5.3. Plots of the magnitudes of the solutions to KSE (first column), r-KSE with ν = 0.5 (second column), and r-KSE with ν = 0.05 (third column). For all simulations, λ = 5.01. Times (top to bottom): 0.0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8. 20 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D. M. Ambrose and A. L. Mazzucato. Global existence and analyticity for the 2D KuramotoSivashinsky equation. J. Dynam. Differential Equations , pages 1–23, 3 2018

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Bellout, S

    H. Bellout, S. Benachour, and E. S. Titi. Finite-time singularity versus global regularity for hyper-viscous Hamilton-Jacobi-like equations. Nonlinearity, 16(6):1967–1989, 2003

    work page 1967

  3. [3]

    L. C. Berselli and S. Spirito. Suitable weak solutions to the 3D Navier–Stokes equations are constructed with the Voigt approximation. J. Differential Equations , 262(5):3285–3316, 2017

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    Bezia and A

    A. Bezia and A. B. Mabrouk. Finite difference method for (2 + 1)-Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. J. Partial Differ. Equ., 31(3):193–213, 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Biswas and D

    A. Biswas and D. Swanson. Existence and generalized Gevrey regularity of solutions to the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation in Rn. J. Differential Equations , 240(1):145–163, 2007

    work page 2007

  6. [6]

    Canuto, M

    C. Canuto, M. Y. Hussaini, A. Quarteroni, and T. A. Zang. Spectral Methods. Scientific Computation. Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 2006. Fundamentals in single domains

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    Y. Cao, E. Lunasin, and E. S. Titi. Global well-posedness of the three-dimensional viscous and inviscid simplified Bardina turbulence models. Commun. Math. Sci. , 4(4):823–848, 2006

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    Cao and E

    Y. Cao and E. S. Titi. Trivial stationary solutions to the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky and certain nonlinear elliptic equations. J. Differential Equations , 231(2):755–767, 2006

    work page 2006

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    S. Chen, C. Foias, D. D. Holm, E. Olson, E. S. Titi, and S. Wynne. A connection between the Camassa-Holm equations and turbulent flows in channels and pipes. Phys. Fluids , 11(8):2343–2353, 1999. The International Conference on Turbulence (Los Alamos, NM, 1998)

    1999

  2. [10]

    B. I. Cohen, J. Krommes, W. Tang, and M. Rosenbluth. Non-linear saturation of the dissipative trapped-ion mode by mode coupling. Nucl. Fusion, 16(6):971, 1976. 21

    1976

  3. [11]

    Collet, J.-P

    P. Collet, J.-P. Eckmann, H. Epstein, and J. Stubbe. Analyticity for the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. Phys. D, 67(4):321–326, 1993

    1993

  4. [12]

    Collet, J.-P

    P. Collet, J.-P. Eckmann, H. Epstein, and J. Stubbe. A global attracting set for the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. Comm. Math. Phys. , 152(1):203–214, 1993

    1993

  5. [13]

    Constantin, C

    P. Constantin, C. Foias, B. Nicolaenko, and R. Temam. Integral Manifolds and Inertial Manifolds for Dissipative Partial Differential Equations , volume 70 of Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989

    1989

  6. [14]

    Constantin, C

    P. Constantin, C. Foias, B. Nicolaenko, and R. Temam. Spectral barriers and inertial manifolds for dissipative partial differential equations. J. Dynam. Differential Equations , 1(1):45–73, 1989

    1989

  7. [15]

    Foias, B

    C. Foias, B. Nicolaenko, G. R. Sell, and R. Temam. Vari´ et´ es inertielles pour l’´ equation de Kuramoto-Sivashinski. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. I Math., 301(6):285–288, 1985

    1985

  8. [16]

    Foias, G

    C. Foias, G. R. Sell, and R. Temam. Vari´ et´ es inertielles des ´ equations diff´ erentielles dissipatives.C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S´ er. I Math., 301(5):139–141, 1985

    1985

  9. [17]

    Foias, G

    C. Foias, G. R. Sell, and E. S. Titi. Exponential tracking and approximation of inertial manifolds for dissipative nonlinear equations. J. Dynam. Differential Equations , 1(2):199–244, 1989

    1989

  10. [18]

    V. A. Galaktionov, `E. Mitidieri, and S. I. Pokhozhaev. Existence and nonexistence of global solutions of the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. Dokl. Akad. Nauk , 419(4):439–442, 2008

    2008

  11. [19]

    Goluskin and G

    D. Goluskin and G. Fantuzzi. Bounds on mean energy in the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation computed using semidefinite programming. Nonlinearity, 32(5):1705–1730, 2019

    2019

  12. [20]

    J. Goodman. Stability of the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky and related systems. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. , 47(3):293– 306, 1994

    1994

  13. [21]

    Gruji´ c

    Z. Gruji´ c. Spatial analyticity on the global attractor for the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. J. Dynam. Differ- ential Equations, 12(1):217–228, 2000

    2000

  14. [22]

    J. S. Il’yashenko. Global analysis of the phase portrait for the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. J. Dynam. Differential Equations, 4(4):585–615, 1992

    1992

  15. [23]

    Kalogirou, E

    A. Kalogirou, E. E. Keaveny, and D. T. Papageorgiou. An in-depth numerical study of the two-dimensional Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. Proc. A., 471(2179):20140932, 20, 2015

    2015

  16. [24]

    Kassam and L

    A.-K. Kassam and L. N. Trefethen. Fourth-order time-stepping for stiff PDEs.SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 26(4):1214– 1233, 2005

    2005

  17. [25]

    C. A. Kennedy and M. H. Carpenter. Additive Runge-Kutta schemes for convection-diffusion-reaction equations. Appl. Numer. Math. , 44(1-2):139–181, 2003

    2003

  18. [26]

    Kostianko, E

    A. Kostianko, E. Titi, and S. Zelik. Large dispersion, averaging and attractors: three 1D paradigms. Nonlinearity, 31(12):R317, 2018

    2018

  19. [27]

    Kuramoto

    Y. Kuramoto. Diffusion-induced chaos in reaction systems. Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 64:346– 367, 1978

    1978

  20. [28]

    Kuramoto and T

    Y. Kuramoto and T. Tsuzuki. On the formation of dissipative structures in reaction-diffusion systems. Prog. Theor. Phys, 54(3):687–699, 1975

    1975

  21. [29]

    Kuramoto and T

    Y. Kuramoto and T. Tsuzuki. Persistent propagation of concentration waves in dissipative media far from equilibrium. Prog. Theor. Phys, 55(2):365–369, 1976

    1976

  22. [30]

    R. E. LaQuey, S. Mahajan, P. Rutherford, and W. Tang. Nonlinear saturation of the trapped-ion mode. Phys. Rev. Lett., 34(7):391, 1975

    1975

  23. [31]

    Larios and E

    A. Larios and E. S. Titi. Global regularity versus finite-time singularities: some paradigms on the effect of boundary conditions and certain perturbations. 430:96–125, 2016

    2016

  24. [32]

    W. J. Layton and L. G. Rebholz. Approximate Deconvolution Models of Turbulence , volume 2042 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics . Springer, Heidelberg, 2012. Analysis, phenomenology and numerical analysis

    2012

  25. [33]

    A. J. Majda and A. L. Bertozzi. Vorticity and Incompressible Flow , volume 27 of Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002

    2002

  26. [34]

    Misbah and A

    C. Misbah and A. Valance. Secondary instabilities in the stabilized kuramoto-sivashinsky equation. Physical Review E, 49(1):166, 1994

    1994

  27. [35]

    Nicolaenko and B

    B. Nicolaenko and B. Scheurer. Remarks on the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. Phys. D , 12(1-3):391–395, 1984

    1984

  28. [36]

    Nicolaenko, B

    B. Nicolaenko, B. Scheurer, and R. Temam. Some global dynamical properties of the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equations: nonlinear stability and attractors. Phys. D, 16(2):155–183, 1985

    1985

  29. [37]

    Nicolaenko, B

    B. Nicolaenko, B. Scheurer, and R. Temam. Attractors for the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equations. In Nonlinear systems of partial differential equations in applied mathematics, Part 2 (Santa Fe, N.M., 1984) , volume 23 of Lectures in Appl. Math. , pages 149–170. Amer. Math. Soc., Pr...

    1984

  30. [38]

    S. A. Orszag. On the elimination of aliasing in finite-difference schemes by filtering high-wavenumber components. Journal of the Atmospheric sciences , 28(6):1074–1074, 1971. 22

    1971

  31. [39]

    R. Peyret. Spectral Methods for Incompressible Viscous Flow , volume 148. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

    2013

  32. [40]

    F. C. Pinto. Nonlinear stability and dynamical properties for two Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equations in space dimension two. ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 1998. Thesis (Ph.D.)–Indiana University

    1998

  33. [41]

    F. C. Pinto. Analyticity and Gevrey class regularity for a Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation in space dimension two. Appl. Math. Lett. , 14(2):253–260, 2001

    2001

  34. [42]

    S. I. Pokhozhaev. On the blow-up of solutions of the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. Mat. Sb., 199(9):97–106, 2008

    2008

  35. [43]

    B. C. Pooley and J. C. Robinson. Well-posedness for the diffusive 3D Burgers equations with initial data in H 1/2. In Recent progress in the theory of the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations , volume 430 of London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., pages 137–153. Cambridge Univ. Press...

    2016

  36. [44]

    J. C. Robinson. Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems. Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001. An Introduction to Dissipative Parabolic PDEs and the Theory of Global Attractors

    2001

  37. [45]

    J. Shen, T. Tang, and L.-L. Wang. Spectral methods, volume 41 ofSpringer Series in Computational Mathematics. Springer, Heidelberg, 2011. Algorithms, analysis and applications

    2011

  38. [46]

    J. Simon. Compact sets in the space lp(0, t; b). Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. , 146:65–96, 1987

    1987

  39. [47]

    J. Simon. Nonhomogeneous viscous incompressible fluids: existence of velocity, density, and pressure. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 21(5):1093–1117, 1990

    1990

  40. [48]

    G. I. Sivashinsky. Nonlinear analysis of hydrodynamic instability in laminar flames. I. Derivation of basic equations. Acta Astronaut., 4(11-12):1177–1206, 1977

    1977

  41. [49]

    G. I. Sivashinsky. On flame propagation under conditions of stoichiometry. SIAM J. Appl. Math. , 39(1):67–82, 1980

    1980

  42. [50]

    G. I. Sivashinsky and D. Michelson. On irregular wavy flow of a liquid film down a vertical plane. Progress of theoretical physics, 63:2112–2114, 1980

    1980

  43. [51]

    Solonnikov, N

    V. Solonnikov, N. Ural’ceva, and O. A. Ladyzhenskaya. Linear and Quasilinear Equations of Parabolic Type , volume 23. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1968. in: Translations in Mathematical Monographs

    1968

  44. [52]

    E. Tadmor. The well-posedness of the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 17(4):884–893, 1986

    1986

  45. [53]

    R. Temam. Infinite-Dimensional Dynamical Systems In Mechanics and Physics , volume 68 of Applied Mathe- matical Sciences. Springer-Verlag, New York, second edition, 1997. (Adam Larios) Department of Mathematics, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0130, USA E-mail...

    1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.