Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 45 references

Equilibria of an aggregation model with linear diffusion in domains with boundaries

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that in domains with boundaries, the existence of swarm equilibria is controlled by an effective volume dimension and by whether the domain is symmetric enough to prevent mass from escaping to infinity.

desk verdict The effective-volume-dimension idea is good and the escaping-mass phenomenon is real, but Theorem 5.1 as stated is false for fD=0, and the sharp-threshold claim needs a corrected assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09373 v1 pith:NVEGHLXV submitted 2019-08-25 math.AP

Daniel A. Messenger , Razvan C. Fetecau This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35A1535Q9249Q22
keywords aggregation-diffusionswarmequilibriadomainboundarieseffectivevolumedimensionenergyminimizersmetastabilityWassersteingradientflownonlocalinteraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies equilibrium states of a continuous swarm that moves by nonlocal attraction or repulsion plus linear diffusion, confined to a spatial domain with a boundary. It argues that two features of the domain geometry control whether an equilibrium exists: the effective volume dimension f_D, which counts how many independent directions extend to infinity, replaces the ambient dimension in the sharp balance between diffusion and attraction; and asymmetry of the domain creates metastable mass translation, so that without an external potential the swarm's center of mass drifts to infinity and no global minimizer exists. In a class of domains of the form F×$R^{{d−m}}$, the paper proves a sharp threshold: attraction growing faster than 2 f_D ν log|x| gives existence, while slower growth makes the energy unbounded below. For general domains it derives a necessary boundary-force balance, and shows that a confining force restores existence. The upshot is that in unbounded domains with boundaries, diffusion plus nonlocal attraction alone is not enough to confine a swarm: the boundary itself pushes it away.

What carries the argument

The key object is the effective volume dimension f_D, defined through V_D(r)=sup_{x∈D}|D∩B_r(x)| and f_D=sup{s: V_D(r)≳r^s}; it measures the number of directions in which the domain extends to infinity and appears in place of d in the logarithmic threshold for K. The other load-bearing tool is the Euler-Lagrange equation K∗ρ+ν log ρ+V=λ together with the fixed-point map T(µ)=Z(µ)^{-1}exp(−(K∗µ+V)/ν), whose fixed points are exactly the critical points with full support. From the Euler-Lagrange equation, the paper derives the boundary condition (5.5) by taking gradients, using that ∇K's antisymmetry cancels the interaction term, and applying the divergence theorem; this condition is what exposes the escaping-mass phenomenon.

What would settle it

Take the half-line D=[0,∞), K(x)=$x^{2}$/2, V=0, and compute the energy E_ν on the family ρ_c of truncated Gaussians (as in the proof of Theorem 5.2). The proof claims c↦E_ν[ρ_c] is strictly decreasing with no critical point; numerically finding a stationary c would refute the non-existence claim in that example.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in domains with boundaries, the condition for existence of global minimizers of the energy E_ν = 1/2∫∫K(x−y)dµdµ + ν∫ρ log ρ + ∫V dµ no longer reduces to boundedness from below, as it does in free space. Instead, two geometry-dependent obstructions appear. First, diffusion-dominated spreading is controlled by the effective volume dimension f_D: if K(x) grows no faster than 2(1−δ)f_Dν log|x| at infinity, the energy is unbounded below, while for domains D=F×$R^{{d−m}}$, growth above 2(1+δ)f_Dν log|x| forces existence. Second, asymmetric unbounded domains exhibit an escaping-mass phenomenon: the necessary condition ν∫_{∂D}nρ dS = −∫_D ρ∇V dx, obtained by differentiating the Euler-Lagrange equation and using antisymmetry of ∇K, cannot be satisfied for V=0 because the density is strictly positive on the boundary, so critical points—and hence minimizers—do not exist. Thus external forces are necessary to confine the swarm in general domains, in contrast to free space.

Load-bearing premise

The proof of the necessary boundary condition assumes the classical trace theorem applies to the possibly unbounded domain, so if the boundary is too irregular for that theorem, the conclusion that external forces are required to confine a swarm is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the sharp threshold holds, then in a cylinder-like domain D=F×R^{d−m}, attraction growing exactly as 2f_Dν log|x| is the borderline: slightly weaker attraction blows the energy to −∞, slightly stronger yields a global minimizer.
  • For any unbounded domain without translation symmetry (half-space, wedge, paraboloid), zero external force means no global minimizer exists, no matter how strong the short-range attraction is—only an external potential can confine the swarm.
  • The boundary condition (5.5) gives a precise stationary-state test: an equilibrium requires the boundary flux ν∫∂D nρ dS to exactly cancel the force ∫_D ρ∇V dx; in simulations, this can be checked pointwise.
  • Since every minimizer must have full support D (Theorem 3.1), linear diffusion prevents compactly supported equilibria even when attraction is very strong; compact support emerges only in the p→∞ singular limit.
  • Adding a coercive confining potential V (growing to +∞ at infinity), or a periodic/translation-invariant domain structure, restores existence for general domains (Theorems 6.3 and 6.4).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The effective volume dimension may be computable for more general domains than F×R^{d−m} (e.g., parabolic or spiral regions), giving a concrete way to predict when a swarm in an obstacle field must be confined externally; measuring V_D(r) numerically would provide a test.
  • The escaping-mass mechanism suggests a design principle for experimental or engineered swarm confinement: a domain whose boundary has zero average outward normal along the region where the swarm sits (e.g., a periodic channel) can equilibrate without external forcing, while any symmetry-breaking defect will pump the swarm toward the boundary.
  • One could test whether the necessary boundary condition (5.5) survives the addition of nonlinear diffusion; if it does, the conclusion that boundaries alone cannot confine a swarm may extend to degenerate-diffusion models, where compactly supported equilibria are otherwise expected.
  • The numerical continuation-from-large-ν heuristic, which found the lower-energy four-aggregate state, suggests a general annealing procedure for non-convex interaction energies on bounded domains; whether it always lands on a global minimizer is not proved here and is a natural next question.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the energy functional (1.1) for an aggregation model with linear diffusion in domains with boundaries, and asks when global minimizers exist. The main theoretical contributions are (i) a non-existence theorem, Theorem 5.1, relating diffusion-dominated spreading to an 'effective volume dimension' f_D of the domain; (ii) a new 'escaping mass' phenomenon illustrated by the half-line example in Theorem 5.2 and encoded in the boundary necessary condition (5.5) of Theorem 5.3; and (iii) existence results, Theorems 6.1, 6.3, and 6.4, under growth conditions on K and confining conditions on V. The paper also proposes a fixed-point iteration for computing critical points and reports several numerical experiments, including examples with multiple critical points. The authors claim that the domain geometry, through f_D, determines the sharp threshold for existence versus non-existence, and that external potentials are necessary to confine swarms in general domains.

Significance. If the main results were valid as stated, the paper would extend the free-space sharp conditions of Carrillo, Delgadino, and Patacchini [13] to bounded and unbounded domains with boundaries, and would identify a genuinely new domain-dependent mechanism for non-existence. The paper is careful in several places: it gives a self-contained proof that minimizers have full support, it provides explicit benchmark computations for the half-line, and the numerical method is described in reproducible detail. However, the central sharp-threshold claim is not valid as stated for f_D=0, and the boundary-trace argument in Theorem 5.3 requires stronger domain regularity than Assumption 2 provides. These are load-bearing issues, so the current version cannot be accepted without substantial revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5.1, Theorem 5.1] The statement of Theorem 5.1 is false when f_D=0, because condition (5.1) then reduces to a mere upper bound on K and the proof's estimate |D_n| >= C n^{f_D} degenerates to a constant lower bound; the logarithmic divergence -delta0 f_D nu log(n) disappears. A concrete counterexample is D = {(x,y) : x>=0, 0<=y<=e^{-x}} subset R^2, with K=0 and V=0. This domain is closed, connected, has |D|=1, and satisfies Assumption 2; moreover f_D=0 since VD(r) <= 1 for all r. Condition (5.1) holds with C0=0 because 0 <= 0 for all |x|. Yet by Jensen's inequality, E_nu[rho] = nu integral rho log rho >= -nu log|D| = 0 for every probability density rho on D, and the uniform density rho=1_D attains equality, so a global minimizer exists. Thus the claimed sharp dependence on f_D is incomplete: f_D=0 does not distinguish finite-volume unbounded domains, where spreading cannot drive the energy to -infinity, from domains with slower-than-polynomial volume growth where it can. The theorem and the associated discussion in the abstract should either assume f_D>0 or replace f_D by a more refined volume-growth exponent.
  2. [Section 5.2, Theorem 5.3] The proof of Theorem 5.3 applies the divergence theorem and classical trace theorems [21, Ch. 5] to the possibly unbounded domain D under Assumption 2(ii), which only requires the outward normal to exist almost everywhere on the boundary. Classical trace theorems require Lipschitz or more regular boundaries, and for unbounded domains one also needs uniform control of the exhaustion sets A_n used in the proof. In addition, the validity of the step 'integral over D of grad rho = boundary integral' requires grad rho in L^1(D), which is not established from the Euler-Lagrange equation under the stated assumptions. Consequently the necessary condition (5.5), and with it the claim in Remark 5.2 that external forces are necessary to confine the swarm in general domains, is not proved for the full class of domains admitted by Assumption 2. The authors should either strengthen Assumption 2 (for instance, assume D is Lipschitz and impose the integrability needed for the trace theorem) or give a proof that the trace of rho exists and is integrable on the boundary under their weaker assumptions.
  3. [Section 3, Corollary 3.1] Corollary 3.1 states an 'if and only if' relationship between the Euler-Lagrange equation (3.3) and fixed points of the map T in (3.8) without proof and without specifying conditions under which Z(mu) is finite and the convolution K*mu is sufficiently regular to justify the exponential representation. This result is used in Theorem 5.2 and Theorem 6.2, so it is not purely cosmetic. A short argument or a precise citation should be supplied, including integrability assumptions on K*mu and V.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2, Eq. (2.12)] The definition of f_D as a supremum does not automatically imply the stated consequence (2.13) at s=f_D; for example, a supremum of an open set of exponents need not be attained. Please either define f_D as the largest exponent for which (2.13) holds, or add an assumption that the supremum is attained, or alter (2.13) to hold for every s<f_D.
  2. [Abstract and Assumption 2] The abstract states that D has 'smooth boundary', while Assumption 2 only assumes a unique outward normal almost everywhere; Theorem 5.3 then relies on stronger regularity. Please make the domain hypotheses consistent throughout.
  3. [Proof of Theorem 3.1] The proof asserts that if supp(rho) is a proper closed subset of D, then D\supp(rho) has positive Lebesgue measure; this requires D to have nonempty interior. Assumption 2 allows closed Borel sets with |D|>0 that might have empty interior, so either the domain should be assumed open with nonempty interior (or otherwise regular) or the statement should be adjusted.
  4. [Section 5.3, Examples] The wedge and paraboloid examples are only sketched; the sign computations of the boundary integrals should be written out explicitly, since the claim that N_d 'cannot be zero' is central to the illustration of Remark 5.2.
  5. [Section 7, Eq. (7.5)] The L1-Lipschitz bound (7.5) is cited to the first author's master's thesis; if this bound is used to justify the choice tau_c=O(nu), it would help to state the exact hypotheses under which it holds or to label the choice as heuristic.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the sharp threshold and non-existence results are derived in-paper from definitions and external benchmarks, not from fitted inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central claims about diffusion-dominated spreading and the sharp condition for existence are proved directly from the definitions and lemmas stated in the paper, not imported from the authors' own prior work. The effective volume dimension fD is defined in (2.12), and Theorem 5.1 constructs an explicit minimizing sequence whose entropy diverges logarithmically using only that definition; Theorem 6.1 proves boundedness below and existence via the log-HLS inequality and convexity estimates. The external results used as anchors (free-space existence conditions from Carrillo et al. [13], Prokhorov's theorem, and the logarithmic Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality) are authored by others and established independently of this paper's fitted values; no constants are fitted to data. The necessary boundary condition (5.5) is derived from the Euler-Lagrange equation (3.3) and the divergence theorem, not from a self-citation. The self-citations that appear ([26], [25], [37]) are contextual: [26] is cited to note a previously identified degeneracy of the zero-diffusion model, [25] to note numerical flexibility, and [37] only to supply a Lipschitz bound used for choosing a numerical relaxation parameter. The skeptical concern about fD = 0 and boundary regularity in Theorem 5.3 is a correctness or assumption-scope issue, not a circularity issue, because the proof does not assume the conclusion it derives. Therefore no step in the derivation reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim introduces no fitted parameters. It relies on standard functional analysis tools (Prokhorov, log-HLS, convexity), Assumptions 1-2 on potentials and domain, and two implicit extra assumptions: trace-theorem boundary regularity and polynomial volume growth so that f_D lies in [0,d]. The effective volume dimension is a new diagnostic quantity, not a physical entity.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math The energy E_nu is weakly-* lower semicontinuous (Lemma 4.1), and Prokhorov's theorem characterizes tightness of measure sequences.
    Used in the existence proofs (Theorems 6.1, 6.3, 6.4) to pass to limits of minimizing sequences.
  • standard math The logarithmic Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality (Lemma 4.2) holds for marginals of probability measures on R^(d-m).
    Used in Step 2 of Theorem 6.1 to bound the double logarithmic interaction from below by entropy.
  • domain assumption Potentials K and V satisfy Assumption 1: local integrability, lower semicontinuity, and symmetry of K.
    Needed for the energy to be well-defined and lower semicontinuous.
  • domain assumption The domain D is closed, connected, |D|>0, and has a unique outward normal a.e. (Assumption 2).
    Used throughout; the normal vector appears in the boundary condition (1.2) and in Theorem 5.3.
  • ad hoc to paper The divergence theorem and classical trace theorems apply to D, implicitly requiring Lipschitz-type boundary regularity.
    The proof of Theorem 5.3 integrates by parts over D and uses trace theorems [21, Ch. 5], which require more regularity than the a.e. normal in Assumption 2. This is an unflagged additional assumption.
  • ad hoc to paper The effective volume dimension f_D, defined as the largest exponent with V_D(r) >= C r^s, is finite and lies in [0,d].
    Theorem 5.1 and the sharpness claim of Theorem 6.1 depend on f_D; domains with super-polynomial volume growth would give f_D=+infinity and the threshold degenerates. The paper does not state this restriction on D.
invented entities (1)
  • Effective volume dimension f_D
    purpose: Quantifies the volume growth of the largest intersection of D with a ball; replaces the ambient dimension d in the sharp existence/non-existence threshold.
    The paper defines f_D in (2.12) and uses it in Theorems 5.1 and 6.1. It is a new diagnostic quantity specific to this paper; it has no independent falsifiable handle outside the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Equilibria of an aggregation model with linear diffusion in domains with boundaries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NVEGHLXV

@misc{pith2026190809373,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Equilibria of an aggregation model with linear diffusion in domains with boundaries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NVEGHLXV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09373}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the effect of linear diffusion and interactions with the domain boundary on swarm equilibria by analyzing critical points of the associated energy functional. Through this process we uncover two properties of energy minimization that depend explicitly on the spatial domain: (i) unboundedness from below of the energy due to an imbalance between diffusive and aggregative forces depends explicitly on a certain volume filling property of the domain, and (ii) metastable mass translation occurs in domains without sufficient symmetry. From the first property, we present a sharp condition for existence (resp. non-existence) of global minimizers in a large class of domains, analogous to results in free space, and from the second property, we identify that external forces are necessary to confine the swarm and grant existence of global minimizers in general domains. We also introduce a numerical method for computing critical points of the energy and give examples to motivate further research.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.09373 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. shows the monotonically decreasing profile of c → Eν [ρc] together with energy plots with an added external potential V (x) = gx, which will be addressed in Theorem 6.2. In particular, it shows the case g = 0 corresponding to (5.3) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Global minimizers under Kp with p = 2, V (x) = gx and ν = 2−6 ≈ 0.0156 computed using the fixed-point iterator. The method is initialized at ρ 0 = 41[0,0.25] with an error tolerance of 1e−6. A spatial grid of N = 210 points is used with points spaced quadratically to resolve the boundary at x = 0 (not all points are plotted). The value gc := p 2ν/π is emphasized because solutions achieve their maximum at x = 0 if an… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Critical points of E ν computed using the fixed-point iterator with Kp for p ∈ {1.0625, 1.125, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 4, 8}, V (x) = gx and ν = 2−6 . Left: profiles for g = 0. Right: profiles for g = ν. As p increases, the maximum height of solutions decreases. The method is initialized at ρ 0 = 0.51[0,2] for g = 0 and ρ 0 = 1[0,1] for g = ν. The error tolerance is set to 1e−6 and the maximum iterations set to Nmax = 2000. A… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Critical points of E ν computed using the fixed-point iterator with Kp for p = 2k , k = 4, . . . , 8, V (x) = gx and ν = 2−6 . Left: profiles for g = 0. Right: profiles for g = ν. As p increases, ρF P drops off sharply outside an interval of length 1, approaching the c…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Multiple critical points for K with  = 0.3 and ν = 2−13. In each case, the fixed-point iterator was initiated at ρ0 = 1 L 1[0,L] and continuation was employed on the diffusion parameter. With initial diffusion ν0 = 10ν, we arrive at a four-aggregate state, while for …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [13]

    J. A. Carrillo, M.G. Delgadino, and F. S. Patacchini. Existence of ground states for aggregation-diffusion equations.Analysis and Applications, 17(3):393–423, 2019

    work page 2019

  2. [1]

    Ambrosio, N

    L. Ambrosio, N. Gigli, and G. Savar´ e. Gradient Flows: in Metric Spaces and in the Space of Probability Measures. Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 2008

    work page 2008

  3. [2]

    Balagu´ e, J

    D. Balagu´ e, J. A. Carrillo, T. Laurent, and G. Raoul. Dimensionality of local minimizers of the interaction energy. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 209(3):1055–1088, 2013

    work page 2013

  4. [3]

    Balagu´ e, J

    D. Balagu´ e, J. A. Carrillo, T. Laurent, and G. Raoul. Nonlocal interactions by repulsive-attractive potentials: radial ins/stability. Phys. D, 260:5–25, 2013

    work page 2013

  5. [4]

    Bertozzi

    Jacob Bedrossian, Nancy Rodr´ ıguez, and Andrea L. Bertozzi. Local and global well-posedness for aggregation equations and Patlak-Keller-Segel models with degenerate diffusion. Nonlinearity, 24(6):1683–1714, 2011

    work page 2011

  6. [5]

    Benachour, B

    S. Benachour, B. Roynette, D. Talay, and P. Vallois. Nonlinear self-stabilizing processes–I existence, invariant probability, propagation of chaos. Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 75(2):173–201, 1998

    work page 1998

  7. [6]

    A. J. Bernoff and C. M. Topaz. A primer of swarm equilibria. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 10(1):212–250, 2011

    work page 2011

  8. [7]

    Blow-up in multidimensional aggregation equations with mildly singular interaction kernels

    Andrea L Bertozzi, Jos´ e A Carrillo, and Thomas Laurent. Blow-up in multidimensional aggregation equations with mildly singular interaction kernels. Nonlinearity, 22(3):683, 2009

    work page 2009

Show all 45 references
  1. [8]

    Finite-time blow-up of solutions of an aggregation equation inRn

    Andrea L Bertozzi and Thomas Laurent. Finite-time blow-up of solutions of an aggregation equation inRn. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 274(3):717–735, 2007

    2007

  2. [9]

    Billingsley

    P. Billingsley. Convergence of Probability Measures. John Wiley & Sons, Chicago, 2013

    2013

  3. [10]

    Burger, R

    M. Burger, R. C. Fetecau, and Y. Huang. Stationary states and asymptotic behavior of aggregation models with nonlinear local repulsion. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 13(1):397–424, 2014

    2014

  4. [11]

    Stationary states of quadratic diffusion equations with long-range attraction

    Martin Burger, Marco Di Francesco, and M Franek. Stationary states of quadratic diffusion equations with long-range attraction. Comm. Math. Sci., 11(3):709–738, 2013

    2013

  5. [12]

    J. A. Ca˜ nizo, J. A. Carrillo, and F. S. Patacchini. Existence of compactly supported global minimisers for the interaction energy. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 217(3):1197–1217, 2015

    2015

  6. [14]

    J. A. Carrillo, M. DiFrancesco, A. Figalli, T. Laurent, and D. Slepˇ cev. Global-in-time weak measure solutions and finite-time aggregation for nonlocal interaction equations. Duke Mathematical Journal, 156(2):229–271, 2011

    2011

  7. [15]

    J. A. Carrillo, S Hittmeir, B Volzone, and Y Yao. Nonlinear aggregation-diffusion equations: radial symmetry and long time asymptotics. Submitted, preprint arXiv:1603.07767 [[math.AP]], 2019

    2019 arXiv

  8. [16]

    J. A. Carrillo, D. Slepˇ cev, and L. Wu. Nonlocal-interaction equations on uniformly prox-regular sets. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems Series A, 36(3):1209–1247, 2014

    2014

  9. [17]

    Kinetic equilibration rates for granular media and related equations: entropy dissipation and mass transportation estimates

    Jos´ e A Carrillo, Robert J McCann, and C´ edric Villani. Kinetic equilibration rates for granular media and related equations: entropy dissipation and mass transportation estimates. Revista Matematica Iberoamericana, 19(3):971–1018, 2003

    2003

  10. [18]

    Carrillo, Robert J

    Jos´ e A. Carrillo, Robert J. McCann, and C´ edric Villani. Contractions in the 2-Wasserstein length space and thermalization of granular media. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 179(2):217–263, 2006

    2006

  11. [19]

    On global minimizers of repulsive-attractive power-law inter- action energies

    Jos´ e Antonio Carrillo, Michel Chipot, and Yanghong Huang. On global minimizers of repulsive-attractive power-law inter- action energies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 372(2028):20130399, 13, 2014. EQUILIBRIA OF AN AGGREGATION MODEL WITH LINEAR DI...

    2014

  12. [20]

    Choksi, R

    R. Choksi, R. C. Fetecau, and I. Topaloglu. On minimizers of interaction functionals with competing attractive and repulsive potentials. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ eAnal. Non Lin´ eaire, 32(6):1283–1305, 2015

    2015

  13. [21]

    L.C. Evans. Partial Differential Equations. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 2010

    2010

  14. [22]

    Evers and T

    J. Evers and T. Kolokolnikov. Metastable states for an aggregation model with noise. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 15(4):2213–2226, 2016

    2016

  15. [23]

    Fellner and G

    K. Fellner and G. Raoul. Stable stationary states of non-local interaction equations. Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 20(12):2267–2291, 2010

    2010

  16. [24]

    Stable stationary states of non-local interaction equations

    Klemens Fellner and Gael Raoul. Stable stationary states of non-local interaction equations. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 20(12):2267–2291, 2010

    2010

  17. [25]

    R. C. Fetecau, H. Huang, D. A. Messenger, and W. Sun. Zero-diffusion limit for aggregation equations over bounded domains. Submitted, preprint arXiv:1809.01763 [math.AP], 2018

    2018 arXiv

  18. [26]

    R. C. Fetecau and M. Kovacic. Swarm equilibria in domains with boundaries.SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 16(3):1260–1308, 2017

    2017

  19. [27]

    R. C. Fetecau, M. Kovacic, and I. Topaloglu. Swarming in domains with boundaries: approximation and regularization by nonlinear diffusion. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems Series B, 24(4):1815–1842, 2019

    2019

  20. [28]

    Fetecau and Yanghong Huang

    Razvan C. Fetecau and Yanghong Huang. Equilibria of biological aggregations with nonlocal repulsive-attractive interac- tions. Phys. D, 260:49–64, 2013

    2013

  21. [29]

    Fetecau, Yanghong Huang, and Theodore Kolokolnikov

    Razvan C. Fetecau, Yanghong Huang, and Theodore Kolokolnikov. Swarm dynamics and equilibria for a nonlocal aggrega- tion model. Nonlinearity, 24(10):2681–2716, 2011

    2011

  22. [30]

    Holm and Vakhtang Putkaradze

    Darryl D. Holm and Vakhtang Putkaradze. Formation of clumps and patches in self-aggregation of finite-size particles. Physica D., 220(2):183–196, 2006

    2006

  23. [31]

    Bertozzi

    Yanghong Huang and Andrea L. Bertozzi. Self-similar blowup solutions to an aggregation equation in Rn. SIAM J. Appl. Math., 70(7):2582–2603, 2010

    2010

  24. [32]

    B. D. Hughes and K. Fellner. Continuum models of cohesive stochastic swarms: the effect of motility on aggregation patterns. Phys. D, 260:26–48, 2013

    2013

  25. [33]

    Bertozzi

    Theodore Kolokolnikov, Hui Sun, David Uminsky, and Andrea L. Bertozzi. A theory of complex patterns arising from 2D particle interactions. Phys. Rev. E, Rapid Communications, 84:015203(R), 2011

    2011

  26. [34]

    Effects of relationships among freezing rate, ice crystal size and color on surface color of frozen salmon fillet

    Shinji Kono, Madoka Kon, Tetsuya Araki, and Yasuyuki Sagara. Effects of relationships among freezing rate, ice crystal size and color on surface color of frozen salmon fillet. Journal of Food Engineering, 214:158–165, 2017

    2017

  27. [35]

    Leverentz, Chad M

    Andrew J. Leverentz, Chad M. Topaz, and Andrew J. Bernoff. Asymptotic dynamics of attractive-repulsive swarms. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., 8(3):880–908, 2009

    2009

  28. [36]

    A convexity principle for interacting gases

    Robert J McCann. A convexity principle for interacting gases. Advances in Mathematics, 128(1):153–179, 1997

    1997

  29. [37]

    D. A. Messenger. Aggregation-diffusion phenomena in domains with boundaries. Master’s thesis, Simon Fraser University, 2019

    2019

  30. [38]

    Mogilner and L

    A. Mogilner and L. Edelstein-Keshet. A non-local model for a swarm. J. Math. Biol., 38:534–570, 1999

    1999

  31. [39]

    Mogilner, L

    A. Mogilner, L. Edelstein-Keshet, L. Bent, and A. Spiros. Mutual interactions, potentials, and individual distance in a social aggregation. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 47(4):353–389, 2003

    2003

  32. [40]

    Heterophilious dynamics enhances consensus

    Sebastien Motsch and Eitan Tadmor. Heterophilious dynamics enhances consensus. SIAM Review, 56:577–621, 2014

    2014

  33. [41]

    Simione, D

    R. Simione, D. Slepˇ cev, and I. Topaloglu. Existence of ground states of nonlocal-interaction energies. J. Stat. Phys., 159(4):972–986, 2015

    2015

  34. [42]

    Topaz, Maria R

    Chad M. Topaz, Maria R. D’Orsogna, Leah Edelstein-Keshet, and Andrew J. Bernoff. Locust dynamics: behavioral phase change and swarming. PLoS Comput. Biol., 8(8):e1002642, 11, 2012

    2012

  35. [43]

    C. Villani. Optimal Transport: Old and New. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, 2008

    2008

  36. [44]

    Wu and D

    L. Wu and D. Slepˇ cev. Nonlocal interaction equations in environments with heterogeneities and boundaries.Communications in Partial Differential Equations, 40(7):1241–1281, 2015. 36 DANIEL A. MESSENGER AND RAZVAN C. FETECAU

    2015

  37. [45]

    Y. Zhang. On continuity equations in space-time domains. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems Series A, 38(10):4837–4873, 2018. Department of Mathematics, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Dr., Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada. E-mail address : daniel.messenger@colorado...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.