Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 41 references

Indirect Microwave Holography and Through Wall Imaging

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper demonstrates that indirect microwave holography can image concealed metallic and dielectric objects through a wall using only intensity measurements, refocusing with back-propagation to reach about 12 mm resolution.

desk verdict A competent review-and-demonstration paper whose new through-wall experiments are plausible but leave the wall unmodeled and the diffraction-limited claim under-supported. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09379 v1 pith:POU255GD submitted 2019-08-25 physics.app-ph eess.SP

Okan Yurduseven , Michael Elsdon This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.app-pheess.SP
keywords indirectmicrowaveholographythrough-wallimagingphaseretrievalintensity-onlymeasurementsback-propagationdiffraction-limitedresolutionconcealedobjectdetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Indirect microwave holography, applied to through-wall imaging, seeks to reconstruct both the amplitude and the phase of the microwave field scattered by a concealed object from intensity-only power measurements. This removes the need for vector receivers and iterative phase retrieval, so the imaging hardware is simpler and cheaper. The paper demonstrates the full chain on a metallic gun and a dielectric box hidden behind a 5 cm plywood wall, and on two small coins, with back-propagation refocusing the recovered complex field from the measurement plane to the object plane. The central claim is that the resulting amplitude and phase images resolve the concealed objects with diffraction-limited resolution, about 12 mm at 12.5 GHz for the scanned aperture.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is off-axis holographic recording plus plane-wave-spectrum filtering and angular-spectrum back-propagation. A coherent reference wave stepped by a linear phase shift of 120 degrees per scan line sets an offset wave vector $k_r = 4 k_0/3$, separating the four Fourier components of $I=|E_s+E_r|^2$; the fourth component is filtered, inverse-transformed to recover $E_s$ at the measurement plane, and then multiplied by the back-propagation phase factor $e^{ik_z d}$ before inverse transformation to $z=d$. This produces focused amplitude and phase images without an iterative solver.

What would settle it

Repeat the two-coin experiment behind walls of different thickness or dielectric constant while keeping the object plane at 20 cm; if the best-focus plane shifts or the coin outlines blur beyond the diffraction limit, the free-space assumption in the back-propagation is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

From the recorded intensity pattern $I=|E_s+E_r|^2$, the fourth component of the plane-wave spectrum is filtered and then back-propagated using the free-space relation $k_z^2 = k_0^2 - k_x^2 - k_y^2$, which focuses the recovered field at the object plane. The paper reports clear outlines of a metallic gun, a dielectric box, and two 5p coins behind a 5 cm plywood wall, and claims diffraction-limited resolution: with the 432 mm aperture at 12.5 GHz, the resolution limit is about 12 mm.

Load-bearing premise

The reconstruction assumes free-space propagation between the measurement plane and the object plane; the 5 cm plywood wall is absent from the back-propagation kernel, so the claim depends on the wall having no appreciable refractive or attenuating effect on focus and resolution.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Through-wall imaging can be done with scalar power measurements and a two-antenna scan, bypassing vector receivers.
  • Both dielectric and metallic concealed objects are recoverable, extending indirect holography beyond metal targets.
  • The phase image is informative only after back-propagation: at the measurement plane it carries little shape data, while at the object plane it outlines the object.
  • With the 432 mm aperture at 12.5 GHz, the achievable resolution is about 12 mm, consistent with resolving 18 mm coins separated by 48 mm.
  • Reconstruction is non-iterative and requires no prior information about the object.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: since back-propagation uses free-space $k_z$ and no wall parameters, larger wall thicknesses or higher-permittivity materials should defocus or shift the image; a wall-compensated kernel is a natural robustness test.
  • Editorial inference: the diffraction-limit check uses a coin separation of twice the operating wavelength; a finer sweep of separations down to the predicted 12 mm limit would give a sharper resolution curve.
  • Editorial inference: the same intensity-only holography chain should apply at other microwave frequencies, with resolution scaling with wavelength and aperture size rather than with the particular plywood wall used here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper reviews and experimentally demonstrates indirect microwave holography for through-wall imaging. The technique records intensity-only scalar microwave holograms with an off-axis reference wave, filters one sideband of the plane-wave spectrum to recover the complex scattered field, and applies a back-propagation algorithm to focus the image at the object plane. Experiments at 12.5 GHz with a 5 cm plywood wall are reported for a metallic gun, a dielectric box, and two coins. The authors claim that the back-propagated amplitude and phase images reveal the concealed objects and that the system achieves diffraction-limited resolution.

Significance. If the claims are substantiated, the technique offers a low-cost, non-iterative alternative to vector-field TWI, and the demonstration with a dielectric target is a useful step beyond purely metallic objects. The mathematical framework is standard and the paper is clearly written about the pipeline: hologram formation, PWS filtering, and back-propagation. The experimental validation, however, is qualitative, and the central through-wall claim rests on an unmodeled wall. These issues, rather than the core derivation, are the primary obstacles to accepting the paper in its current form.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II-B, Eqs. (10)-(11) and Section III-A] The back-propagation algorithm assumes free-space propagation between the measurement plane and the object plane. Equation (10) defines kz using only the free-space wavenumber k0 and the transverse wavenumbers kx, ky, and Eq. (11) applies this propagator over the full distance d. The experiments place a 5 cm plywood wall in that path, yet the paper neither characterizes the wall (permittivity, insertion phase, attenuation) nor demonstrates through simulation or a no-wall control that ignoring the wall is a good approximation. At 12.5 GHz, plywood has a permittivity well above 1, so the phase advance through the wall differs from free space by an angle-dependent amount roughly (kz_wall - kz_air) times the wall thickness; this can misplace the focus plane and degrade the resolution. Because the central claim is through-wall imaging, this is a load-bearing gap that must be addressed, for example by incorporating a layered-medium propagator or by providing explicit evidence that the free-space assumption introduces negligible error for this wall.
  2. [Section III-C, Eq. (13) and Fig. 20] The claim that 'the resolution of the system is diffraction limited' is not supported by the data. Equation (13) gives a theoretical resolution of about 12 mm for the 432 mm aperture, but the experiment only demonstrates that two 18 mm coins separated by 48 mm can be distinguished. Resolving a 48 mm separation establishes only that the resolution is at least as good as 48 mm, not that it approaches 12 mm. A quantitative resolution test—for example, imaging targets at several separations down to the predicted limit, or measuring a point-spread function—is needed before the diffraction-limited claim can be made.
  3. [Section III-A, PWS filter size selection] The optimal PWS filtering size (72x72) is selected by a parametric analysis performed on the same measured data that is subsequently used to produce the reported images. Since the filter size directly controls the balance between low-frequency structure and high-frequency edge detail, the visual quality of the reconstructed images is partly a result of this post hoc choice. The paper should validate the selected filter size on independent data or with a quantitative image-quality metric, and report the sensitivity of the reconstructions to the filter size.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Section II heading] The heading 'INDIRECT MIVROWAVE HOLOGRAPHY' contains a typo; it should read 'MICROWAVE'.
  2. [Eqs. (4)-(5)] The equations for the reference wave and the offset wave vector are garbled in the typeset version; please reformat them so that the x- and y-axis cases are clear.
  3. [Section III-A, Eq. (12)] The word 'avarage' in Eq. (12) should be 'average'.
  4. [Section III-C, Eq. (13)] Equation (13) defines the diffraction-limited resolution without specifying what δ and L denote; state explicitly that δ is the resolution and L is the side length of the synthesized aperture.
  5. [Figures 7-8 and 13] The axis labels and frequency-axis tick values in the PWS plots are hard to read at the reproduced size; consider enlarging them or splitting the plots into separate panels.
  6. [Section III-A, experimental description] The wall is described only as a '5 cm thick plywood block'; please provide its measured dielectric properties or, if not measured, state the nominal values used in any assessment of its effect.
  7. [Abstract and Section I] The paper is titled and framed as a 'review' but presents new experimental results; consider rephrasing the abstract and introduction to describe the paper as an experimental study with a review component.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Minor post-hoc tuning of the PWS sideband filter; the holographic phase-retrieval and back-propagation core is self-contained.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section III-A, paragraph on PWS component filtering and Section III-C resolution discussion]
    "In the selection of the fourth PWS component in Fig. 8, consideration must be given to determine the optimum filtering size. ... To this end, parametric analysis was carried out and a filtering size of 72x72 was found to be an ideal PWS fourth component filtering matrix size to achieve optimum image reconstruction accuracy."

    The 72x72 sideband filter determines which spatial-frequency components survive before inverse Fourier transformation and back-propagation. Choosing that width via parametric analysis on the same measured hologram and then presenting the filtered result as the demonstrated image quality means the displayed resolution and contrast are partly products of the chosen bandwidth, not independent predictions. This is a data-dependent processing parameter, but it does not enter Eqs. (10)-(11) or alter the recovered phase-retrieval relation; the central imaging chain remains a direct transform of the measured intensity.

full rationale

The derivation chain (Eqs. (1)-(11)) is a standard indirect-holography phase retrieval followed by angular-spectrum back-propagation. The complex field at the object plane is obtained by a deterministic Fourier filter and phase propagator; no object contrast, location, or wall parameters are fitted. The through-wall imaging claim is thus not reduced to the paper's inputs by construction: the measured holograms supply the only object information, and the images are compared to known object outlines. The only notable circular element is the sideband filter size: the authors state they performed a parametric analysis on the data to find a 72x72 filter 'ideal' for reconstruction accuracy, so the reported image quality is partly tuned rather than fully predicted. This is a mild, contained issue because filter selection is a standard processing degree of freedom and the back-propagation/resolution model is not fit to the results. The diffraction-limited resolution claim (resolving 18 mm coins separated by 48 mm when Eq. (13) gives ~12 mm) is under-supported but is a correctness/validation weakness, not circularity. Self-citations to prior indirect-holography work are present but not load-bearing; the experiments and equations here stand alone. Overall: no significant circularity, with one minor post-hoc tuning step.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The reconstruction rests on standard Fourier-optics axioms and on the assumption that the wall does not affect the propagation model, which is the least supported premise.

free parameters (1)
  • PWS filter size = 72x72
    Selected via parametric analysis in Section III-A to achieve optimum image reconstruction accuracy on the same hidden-gun data set.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Scalar wave propagation and plane wave spectrum decomposition describe the scattered microwave fields
    Used throughout Section II-A, Eqs (1)-(9), to relate intensity measurements to the complex scattered field.
  • ad hoc to paper The plywood wall can be ignored in the back-propagation
    Eqs (10) and (11) back-propagate using free-space kz and make no mention of wall thickness, permittivity, or attenuation.
  • domain assumption The object field is band-limited and the offset kr >= 3 kM separates the PWS components
    Eq (6) imposes this separation without derivation; it is required for clean filtering of the fourth component.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Indirect Microwave Holography and Through Wall Imaging." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/POU255GD

@misc{pith2026190809379,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Indirect Microwave Holography and Through Wall Imaging},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/POU255GD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09379}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, a review of indirect microwave holography for through-wall imaging is presented. Indirect microwave holography is an imaging technique, enabling the complex object scattered fields (amplitude and phase) to be mathematically recovered from intensity-only, scalar microwave measurements. By removing the requirement to use vector measurement equipment to directly measure the complex fields, indirect microwave holography significantly reduces the cost of the imaging system and simplifies the hardware implementation. The application of a back-propagation algorithm enables the reconstructed amplitude and phase images to be obtained at the plane of the concealed object. In order to demonstrate the validity of the reviewed approach, experimental work is carried out on a metallic gun concealed under a 5 cm thick plywood wall and it is demonstrated that the indirect microwave holographic TWI can produce good resolution amplitude and phase images when back-propagation is applied. TWI of a concealed dielectric box representing non-metallic ordnance is also performed to demonstrate the ability of the technique to reconstruct through-wall images of concealed dielectric objects. An investigation of the resolution characteristics of the system suggests diffraction limited resolution can be achieved.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Indirect holographic techniques for determining antenna radiation characteristics and imaging aperture fields,

    D. Smith, M. Leach, M. Elsdon, and S. J. Foti, “Indirect holographic techniques for determining antenna radiation characteristics and imaging aperture fields,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 54-67, Feb. 2007

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    A modified holographic technique for pl anar near -field antenna measurements,

    M. P. Leach, D. Smith, and S. P. Skobelev, "A modified holographic technique for pl anar near -field antenna measurements," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 3342-3345, Oct. 2008

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Arboleya, J

    A. Arboleya, J. Laviada, and F. Las-Heras, “Scalar Calibration for Broadband Phaseless Antenna Measurements Based on Indirect Off -Axis Holography, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 66, no. 6, pp.3241-3246, 2018

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Phaseless antenna diagnostics based on off -axis holography with synthetic reference wave,

    J. L. Martínez, A. Arboleya-Arboleya, Y. Alvarez-Lopez, C. Garcia-Gonzalez, and F. Las -Heras, “Phaseless antenna diagnostics based on off -axis holography with synthetic reference wave,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 13, pp.43-46, 2013

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Investigations of resolution limits for indirect microwave holographic imaging,

    O. Yurduseven, D. Smith, B. Livingstone, V. Schejbal, and Z. You, “Investigations of resolution limits for indirect microwave holographic imaging,” International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer -Aided Engineering, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 410-416, July 2013

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Microwa ve imaging using indirect holographic techniques,

    D. Smith, O. Yurduseven, B. Livingstone, and V. Schejbal, “Microwa ve imaging using indirect holographic techniques,” IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 104-117, Feb. 2014

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Indirect microwave holographic imaging of concealed ordnance for airport security imaging systems,

    O. Yurduseven, “Indirect microwave holographic imaging of concealed ordnance for airport security imaging systems,” Progress in Electromagnetics Research, 146, pp.7-13, 2014

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    Interferometric technique with nonredundant sampling for phaseless inverse scattering,

    J. Laviada, Y. Alvarez-Lopez, A. Arboleya-Arboleya, C. Garcia-Gonzalez, and F. Las -Heras, “Interferometric technique with nonredundant sampling for phaseless inverse scattering,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 62, no. 2, pp.739-746, 2013

    work page 2013

Show all 41 references
  1. [9]

    Through -wall imaging via a linear inverse scattering algorithm,

    F. Soldovieri and R. Solimene, "Through -wall imaging via a linear inverse scattering algorithm," IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 513-517, Oct. 2007

    2007

  2. [10]

    Sparse tomographic inverse scattering approach for through -the-wall radar imaging,

    F. Soldovieri, R. Solimene, F. Ahmad, "Sparse tomographic inverse scattering approach for through -the-wall radar imaging," IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement , vol. 61, no.12, pp. 3340 -3350, Dec. 2012

    2012

  3. [11]

    A qualitative inverse scattering method for through-the-wall imaging,

    I. Catapano and L. Crocco, "A qualitative inverse scattering method for through-the-wall imaging," IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 685-689, Oct. 2010

    2010

  4. [12]

    Three-dimensional real-time through-the-wall radar imaging with diffraction tomographic algorithm,

    W. Zhang and A. Hoorfar, "Three-dimensional real-time through-the-wall radar imaging with diffraction tomographic algorithm," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 4155-4163, Jul. 2013

    2013

  5. [13]

    Experimental validation of a simple system for through-the-wall inverse scattering,

    I. Akduman, L. Crocco, and F. Soldovieri, "Experimental validation of a simple system for through-the-wall inverse scattering," IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 258-262, Mar. 2011

    2011

  6. [14]

    Three -dimensional through-wall imaging under ambiguous wall parameters,

    R. Solimene, F. Soldovieri, G. Prisco, and R. Pierri, "Three -dimensional through-wall imaging under ambiguous wall parameters," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1310-1317, May 2009

    2009

  7. [15]

    Sparse blind deconvolution for imaging through layered media,

    D. L. Marks, O. Yurduseven, and D. R. Smith, “Sparse blind deconvolution for imaging through layered media,” Optica, vol. 4, no. 12, pp.1514 -1521, 2017

    2017

  8. [16]

    Through-the-wall imaging using differential SAR,

    M. Dehmollaian, M. Thiel, and K. Sarabandi, "Through-the-wall imaging using differential SAR," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1289-1296, May 2009

    2009

  9. [17]

    Development and implementation of ultra-wideband see -through-wall imaging system based on sampling oscilloscope,

    Y. Yang, C. Zhang, and A. E. Fathy, "Development and implementation of ultra-wideband see -through-wall imaging system based on sampling oscilloscope," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propag ation Letters , vol. 7, pp. 465-468, 2008

    2008

  10. [18]

    Advanced system level simulation platform for three-dimensional UWB through -wall imaging SAR using time -domain approach,

    Y. Wang and A. E. Fathy, "Advanced system level simulation platform for three-dimensional UWB through -wall imaging SAR using time -domain approach," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1986-2000, May 2012

    1986

  11. [19]

    Synthetic aperture beamformer for imaging through a dielectric wall,

    F. Ahmad, M. G. Amin, and S. A. Kassam, "Synthetic aperture beamformer for imaging through a dielectric wall," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 271-283, Jan. 2005

    2005

  12. [20]

    A portable real-time digital noise radar system for through -the-wall imaging,

    P.-H. Chen, M. C. Shastry, C.-P. Lai, and R. M. Narayanan, "A portable real-time digital noise radar system for through -the-wall imaging," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 50, no. 10, p p. 4123- 4134, Oct. 2012

    2012

  13. [21]

    Through -wall imaging of moving targets using UWB random noise radar,

    H. Wang, R. M. Narayanan, and Z. O. Zhou, "Through -wall imaging of moving targets using UWB random noise radar," IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 8, pp. 802-805, 2009

    2009

  14. [22]

    High -resolution through -the-wall radar imaging using beamspace MUSIC,

    Y.-S. Yoon and M. G. Amin, "High -resolution through -the-wall radar imaging using beamspace MUSIC," IEEE Trans actions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1763-1774, Jun. 2008

    2008

  15. [23]

    High-frequency EM characterization of through-wall building imaging,

    P. C. Chang, R. J. Burkholder, J. L. Volakis, R. J. Marhefka, and Y. Bayram, "High-frequency EM characterization of through-wall building imaging," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1375 - 1387, May 2009

    2009

  16. [24]

    UWB through -wall imaging based on compressive sensing,

    Q. Huang, L. Qu, B. Wu, and F. Guangyou, "UWB through -wall imaging based on compressive sensing," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 1408-1415, Mar. 2010

    2010

  17. [25]

    Adaptive polarization contrast techniques for through -wall microwave imaging applications,

    K. M. Yemelyanov, N. Engheta, A. Hoorfar, and J. A. McVay, "Adaptive polarization contrast techniques for through -wall microwave imaging applications," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1362-1374, May 2009

    2009

  18. [26]

    Detection of concealed individuals based on their vital signs by using a see- through-wall imaging system with a self -injection-locked radar,

    F.-K. Wang, T. -S. Horng, K. -C. Peng, J. -K. Jau, J. -Y. Li, and C. -C. Chen, "Detection of concealed individuals based on their vital signs by using a see- through-wall imaging system with a self -injection-locked radar," IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques ...

    2013

  19. [27]

    Shifted pixel method for through-wall radar imaging,

    P.-H. Chen and R. M. Narayanan, "Shifted pixel method for through-wall radar imaging," IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 3706-3716, Aug. 2012

    2012

  20. [28]

    Large metasurface aperture for millimeter wave computational imaging at the human -scale,

    J. N. Gollub, et. al., “ Large metasurface aperture for millimeter wave computational imaging at the human -scale,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, p p. 42650, 2017

    2017

  21. [29]

    Cavity-backed metasurface antennas and their application to frequency diversity imaging,

    D. L. Marks, O. Yurduseven, and D. R. Smith, “Cavity-backed metasurface antennas and their application to frequency diversity imaging,” Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol. 34, no. 4, pp.472-480, 2017

    2017

  22. [30]

    and Smith, D.R., 2017

    Fromenteze, T., Yurduseven, O., Boyarsky, M., Gollub, J., Marks, D.L. and Smith, D.R., 2017. Computational polarimetric microwave imaging ,” Optics Express, vol. 25, no. 22, pp.27488-27505

    2017

  23. [31]

    Resolution of the frequency diverse metamaterial aperture imager ,

    O. Yurduseven, et. al., “Resolution of the frequency diverse metamaterial aperture imager ,” Progress in Electromagnetics Research , vol. 150, pp.97 - 107, 2015

    2015

  24. [32]

    Printed aperiodic cavity for computational and microwave imaging,

    O. Yurduseven, V. R. Gowda, J. N. Gollub, and D. R. Smith, “Printed aperiodic cavity for computational and microwave imaging,” IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 367-369, 2016

    2016

  25. [33]

    Millimeter-wave spotlight imager using dynamic holographic metasurface antennas,

    O. Yurduseven, D. L. Marks, T. Fromenteze, J. N. Gollub, and D. R. Smith, “Millimeter-wave spotlight imager using dynamic holographic metasurface antennas,” Optics Express, vol. 25, no. 15, pp.18230-18249, 2017

    2017

  26. [34]

    Frequency- diverse microwave imaging using planar Mills-Cross cavity apertures,

    O. Yurduseven, J. N. Gollub, D. L. Marks, and D. R. Smith, “Frequency- diverse microwave imaging using planar Mills-Cross cavity apertures,” Optics Express, vol. 24, no. 8, pp.8907-8925, 2016

    2016

  27. [35]

    A fast level set method for multimaterial recovery in microwave imaging ,

    P. Shah, and M. Moghaddam, “A fast level set method for multimaterial recovery in microwave imaging ,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 66(6), pp.3017-3026, 2018

    2018

  28. [36]

    Sparse reconstruction algorithms for nonlinear micr owave imaging,

    H. Zaimaga, A. Fraysse and M. Lambert, "Sparse reconstruction algorithms for nonlinear micr owave imaging," 25th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), Kos, 2017, pp. 713-717, 2017

    2017

  29. [37]

    Sparse Electromagnetic Imaging using Non - Linear Landweber Iterations,

    A. Desmal and H. Bagci, “Sparse Electromagnetic Imaging using Non - Linear Landweber Iterations,” Progress in Electromagnetics Research , vol. 152, pp. 77-93, 2015

    2015

  30. [38]

    Frequency-diverse computational microwave phaseless imaging,

    O. Yurduseven, T. Fromenteze, D. L. Marks, J. N. Gollub, and D. R. Smith, “Frequency-diverse computational microwave phaseless imaging,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 16, pp.2808-2811, 2017

    2017

  31. [39]

    Phaseless computational imaging with a radiating metasurface,

    T. Fromenteze, X. Liu, M. Boyarsky, J. Gollub, and D. R. Smith, “Phaseless computational imaging with a radiating metasurface,” Optics Express, vol. 24, no. 15, pp.16760-16776, 2016

    2016

  32. [40]

    Phaseless computational ghost imaging at microwave frequencies using a dynamic metasurface aperture,

    A. V. Diebold, M. F. Imani, T. Sleasman, and D. R. Smith, “Phaseless computational ghost imaging at microwave frequencies using a dynamic metasurface aperture,” Applied Optics, vol. 57, no. 9, pp.2142-2149, 2018

    2018

  33. [41]

    Hybrid Microwave Approach for Phaseless Imaging of Dielectric Targets,

    S. Costanzo, G. Di Massa, M. Pastorino and A. Randazzo, "Hybrid Microwave Approach for Phaseless Imaging of Dielectric Targets," IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 851-854, 2015

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.