Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

New Insights on Ly-alpha and Lyman Continuum Radiative Transfer in the Greenest Peas

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read New ultraviolet spectra of thirteen highly ionized Green Pea galaxies show that the Lyα double-peak separation traces the transparency of low-density gas channels, that covering fraction traces porosity, and that [O III]/[O II] alone…

desk verdict New COS data on the most extreme Green Peas with careful measurements, but the central ΔvLyα–column-density interpretation is underdetermined and should be tested against direct LyC data. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09763 v1 pith:UEKSF6DV submitted 2019-08-26 astro-ph.GA

Anne E. Jaskot , Tara Dowd , M. S. Oey , Claudia Scarlata , Jed McKinney This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords GreenPeagalaxiesLymancontinuumescapeLyαradiativetransfercoveringfractionlow-ionizationUVabsorptionlinesreionizationanalogsHSTCOSspectroscopydensity-boundednebulae
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper uses new ultraviolet spectra of thirteen of the most highly ionized Green Pea galaxies, together with earlier samples, to separate two things that control whether Lyman continuum radiation can escape a starburst galaxy: how much of the sight line is covered by dense neutral gas, and how transparent the low-density gaps between the dense clouds are. It argues that the Lyα escape fraction tracks the first quantity, the covering fraction (a porosity measure), while the velocity separation between the two Lyα emission peaks, ΔvLyα, tracks the second, the residual hydrogen column density of the gaps. That is why narrow peak separation, not high escape fraction, is the signature most closely tied to an ionized, density-bounded state. The paper also finds that high [O III]/[O II] galaxies are strong Lyα emitters mostly because they produce many ionizing photons, and that low metallicity correlates with narrow ΔvLyα through a compact, clumpy gas geometry that may be produced by weak mechanical feedback around young star clusters. If this two-tracer picture holds, it sharpens the search for the galaxies that reionized the universe and warns against using [O III]/[O II] alone as a Lyman continuum escape diagnostic.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing observables are the Lyα double-peak separation ΔvLyα, which radiative-transfer models connect to H I column density, and the Si II covering fraction fcov, measured from the residual intensity at line center, which measures gas porosity. The paper adds the flux at the Lyα profile minimum Fmin/Fcont, the Lyα escape fraction, and the balance of low-ionization resonant absorption (Si II, C II, O I) versus fluorescent non-resonant emission (Si II*, C II*) to map where absorbing gas sits relative to the line of sight. Together these diagnostics are used to infer a multiphase medium: dense, clumpy clouds that generate high ionization parameters, embedded in a low-density inter-clump medium whose column density sets ΔvLyα and through which LyC and narrow Lyα escape.

What would settle it

Direct ultraviolet observations of Lyman continuum escape from the 13 new Green Peas would settle the claim: the prediction is that J1608+3528 and other galaxies with narrow ΔvLyα and weak low-ionization lines will show detectable LyC leakage, while the two galaxies with deep, broad Lyα absorption (J1335+0801 and J1448-0110) will not. A model-level check is to compare the ΔvLyα–NH I mapping used in the shell and clumpy radiative-transfer models against the H I column densities these same galaxies show in their Lyα absorption troughs.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that two observables separately track the two geometric ingredients that control Lyman continuum escape in Green Pea galaxies. The Lyα escape fraction fesc,Lyα is driven by the covering fraction fcov, a measure of porosity: the two anti-correlate with ρ≈−0.82, and confirmed LyC leakers all have low fcov. The velocity separation ΔvLyα between the Lyα emission peaks is instead driven by the column density of the residual low-column-density gas between clumps: it correlates with [O I]/Hβ, [O III]/[O II], and metallicity, none of which correlate strongly with fcov. The paper therefore argues that ΔvLyα can reveal the transparency of the channels through which LyC photons escape, while fcov reveals how much of the sight line is covered by dense gas. High [O III]/[O II] selects galaxies with high intrinsic Lyα and LyC production, which is why so many are Lyα emitters and candidate LyC leakers, but it remains insufficient as a standalone LyC diagnostic because orientation and clumpiness decide whether an individual sight line is transparent.

Load-bearing premise

The argument stands on the claim that the gap between the two hydrogen-line peaks is a direct measure of how much thin gas the light passed through; if real galaxies mix dense clouds and thin gas in a way that breaks that relationship, the paper's central interpretation falls, and none of the 13 new galaxies has a direct measurement of escaping ionizing radiation to check it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Narrow ΔvLyα can serve as a secondary, high-redshift LyC diagnostic: where direct Lyman continuum is unobservable, a close double-peak Lyα profile points to transparent low-column-density channels, while covering fraction measurements point to sight-line porosity.
  • Lyα EW is a proxy for the net escaping LyC flux (production times escape), not for escape fraction alone, because high intrinsic Lyα production boosts EW even at moderate fesc,Lyα.
  • Single-component gas geometries are insufficient: radiative-transfer models used to interpret LyC leakers must include a range of H I column densities, with dense clumps embedded in a lower-density inter-clump medium, or they will mispredict the Lyα–LyC relationship.
  • Stacked high-redshift spectra will understate the true variation in low-ionization absorption and emission; the average profile corresponds to no individual galaxy, so conclusions about gas geometry from stacks need caution.
  • Low-metallicity, compact clusters with suppressed mechanical feedback are the most plausible sites of LyC-transparent channels, implying that reionization-era conditions may be set by cluster formation physics, not just by galaxy mass or star formation rate.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A test the paper does not spell out: if ΔvLyα traces the column density of the escape channels, then in LyC leakers the residual flux at the Lyα profile minimum should correlate with the LyC escape fraction more tightly than ΔvLyα itself does, because Fmin is set by the same low-column-density paths.
  • By implication, the orientation dependence the paper invokes could be quantified: galaxies with similar [O III]/[O II] and fcov should scatter in fesc,LyC according to how many transparent channels happen to align with the line of sight, producing a natural prediction for the scatter in the [O III]/[O II]–fesc,LyC relation.
  • The fine-structure absorption in C II* and Si II* implies that column densities derived from resonant lines without accounting for these excited states will be biased; future work could model collisional excitation and pumping to correct those measurements.
  • The metallicity–ΔvLyα link raises the possibility of using Lyα profile shape as a rough metallicity/ionization tracer in regimes where nebular lines are unavailable, though that would require independent calibration.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents new HST/COS ultraviolet spectra of 13 extremely high-ionization Green Pea galaxies, with [O III]/[O II] between 6.6 and 34.9, and combines these with earlier GP samples to examine correlations among Ly-alpha profile parameters, low-ionization absorption/emission lines, gas covering fractions, and optical nebular properties. The main interpretive claim is that the Ly-alpha peak separation Δv_Lyα traces the column density of low-column-density pathways, while the Si II covering fraction f_cov traces the porosity of the neutral ISM; the paper further connects low metallicity, high ionization, and narrow Δv_Lyα through a catastrophic-cooling, clumpy-geometry scenario. The authors also emphasize that high [O III]/[O II] selects galaxies with many LyC emitter candidates but is not by itself a sufficient LyC escape diagnostic, and they caution that stacked LIS spectra do not represent any individual galaxy.

Significance. If the central interpretation holds, the paper provides a step toward using Ly-alpha profile shape and low-ionization lines as indirect tracers of LyC escape, which matters for reionization-era galaxies. The observational effort is substantial: the new COS sample extends to the most extreme ionization parameters known in SDSS, and the paper gives careful attention to extraction-aperture flux losses, spectral resolution, continuum placement, and systematic uncertainties. The authors also deserve credit for explicitly flagging the main limitations of their own analysis, including the lower-limit nature of f_cov, aperture effects, contamination by non-resonant absorption, and the non-representativeness of stacked spectra. The correlations are useful observational constraints even if the physical interpretation is not uniquely determined.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2.3 and Section 5.2] The claim that ΔvLyα traces column density while f_cov traces porosity is underdetermined by the presented data. The evidence is correlational: ΔvLyα correlates with ionization measures and f_cov does not (Section 3.2.3), and ΔvLyα and f_cov are only moderately correlated (ρ=0.56, Table 7). In the clumpy, multiphase medium the paper itself advocates, Lyα peak separation is an integrated sightline property that depends on the full column-density distribution, clump optical depth, and orientation, not uniquely on the inter-clump column density. The cited radiative-transfer mappings (Verhamme et al. 2015; Dijkstra et al. 2016) assume simpler geometries, and the paper's own statement in Section 3.2.5 that the GPs are 'neither pure shells nor a distribution of clumps with completely evacuated holes' sharpens this concern. The observed ΔvLyα–f_cov correlation is also what would be expected if both quantities respond to the same clump/column degeneracy rather than to two cleanly separated physical parameters. I recommend either softening the diagnostic claim to 'consistent with' while explicitly listing the degenerate interpretation, or adding multiphase Lyα radiative-transfer calculations that vary f_cov and inter-clump column density independently and demonstrating that ΔvLyα separates them.
  2. [Tables 6–9 and Section 3.2] The correlation analysis reports Spearman ρ and sample sizes but no significance levels or confidence intervals. Several correlations that anchor the main text have N=10–15, for example EWnet(C II*1335+C II1334) with Lyα EW (ρ=0.80, N=12; Table 6) and EWnet(O I*1305+O I1302) with ΔvLyα (ρ=−0.85, N=11; Table 7). The contrast between the ΔvLyα–ionization correlations and the f_cov–ionization correlations (Section 3.2.3) is a comparison of coefficients with different values and different sample sizes, and the paper does not test whether the difference is significant. Because the Δv/porosity separation rests partly on this contrast, please provide p-values or bootstrap confidence intervals for all reported correlations, and where the text contrasts two correlations, assess whether the difference is statistically meaningful.
  3. [Section 2.2 and Section 4.3] The f_cov measurements are derived from Si II residual intensities and are acknowledged in Section 2.2 to be lower limits, and Section 4.3 shows that C II* and Si II* absorption can contaminate the relevant lines. Since the paper uses f_cov to separate porosity from column-density effects, the robustness of the f_cov–ΔvLyα and f_cov–ionization correlations to these systematic effects should be quantified. For example, the authors could recompute the key correlations after excluding low-metallicity objects, where Si II absorption is intrinsically weaker, or after applying a correction for non-resonant absorption where detected. Without such a test, the reader cannot tell whether the reported f_cov trends are dominated by the known systematics rather than by actual covering-fraction variations.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.2.4] The sentence 'metallicity appears to be linked specifically to Lyα optical depth' overstates what a correlational study can establish; consider rewording to 'linked to the properties that trace Lyα optical depth'.
  2. [Tables 4 and 5] The tables contain many 1σ upper and lower limits, but the text does not describe how these limits were treated in the EWnet correlations shown in Figure 17. Please state explicitly whether limits were excluded, replaced by the limiting value, or handled with a survival-analysis method.
  3. [Section 4.4 and Figure 18] The stacked-spectrum discussion would be clearer if the figure or caption stated the number of galaxies contributing to each wavelength bin, since the line coverage varies from object to object.
  4. [Section 1 and Table 1] There are a few typographical inconsistencies, such as 'T able 1' in the table caption and a stray 'delta_v,LyA' in the abstract; a final copyedit would remove these.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the measured quantities are independent, and the central interpretation rests on external radiative-transfer models and empirical correlations, not on fitted inputs or self-referential definitions.

full rationale

I find no circular step in this paper. The central observables are measured independently of the claims they support: Delta-v_LyA is measured from the COS Ly-alpha profiles, fcov is derived from Si II residual intensities (taken from McKinney et al. 2019 and Gazagnes et al. 2018), and fesc,LyA is computed from Ly-alpha and H-alpha fluxes under Case B assumptions. None of these quantities is defined in terms of another quantity that the paper claims to predict. The paper's main interpretive suggestion, that Delta-v_LyA may trace the residual transparency of low-column-density pathways while fcov traces porosity, is explicitly an interpretation of correlations and is grounded in external radiative-transfer models (Verhamme et al. 2015; Dijkstra et al. 2016). The paper does not fit a parameter to a subset of data and then rename it as a prediction; it reports Spearman correlations and proposes a physical picture consistent with them. The use of companion papers by the same group (e.g., McKinney et al. 2019 for fcov, Jaskot et al. 2017 for previous Delta-v measurements) is data and method provenance, not load-bearing circular reasoning, and the fcov measurements are additionally sourced in part from the independent Gazagnes et al. 2018 analysis. The paper also explicitly acknowledges limitations, such as the lower-limit nature of the Si II-derived fcov and the statement that the GPs are 'neither pure shells nor a distribution of clumps with completely evacuated holes.' These are scientific caveats about an underdetermined interpretation, not circular derivations. No equation in the paper reduces a claimed result to its own inputs, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work to force the conclusion. The analysis is therefore self-contained as an observational study with an interpretive hypothesis, and the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central interpretation requires standard physics (Case B recombination) and three domain assumptions from the literature: the Δv-NHI mapping, Si ii residual intensity as a porosity proxy, and catastrophic-cooling clumpy geometry. The first is standard; the latter three are external model inputs, and the paper acknowledges the model-dependence of Δv and fcov rather than hiding it.

free parameters (2)
  • Adopted electron temperature for [O III] 4363 non-detections = 13451 K
    Set to the sample mean and used with PyNeb to derive oxygen abundances for galaxies lacking a direct Te measurement; this value enters the Δv-metallicity correlation reported in Section 3.2.4 and the Appendix.
  • Dust attenuation law R_V choice = R_V = 2.7 for Hβ EW > 150 A, else 3.1
    Internal extinction corrections follow Izotov et al. 2017a with R_V depending on Hβ EW; this affects extinction-corrected line ratios, luminosities, and SFRs used in the correlation analysis (§2.1).
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Case B recombination gives Lyα/Hα ≈ 8.24-8.96 for the measured electron temperatures and densities.
    Used in §2.2 to convert extinction-corrected Hα flux into intrinsic Lyα flux for computing fesc,Lyα.
  • domain assumption Lyα double-peak separation ΔvLyα maps to H I column density in Lyα radiative transfer models.
    Adopted from Verhamme et al. 2015 and Dijkstra et al. 2016; this mapping is the basis for interpreting narrow Δv as low-column-density pathways (§2.2, §3.2.3).
  • domain assumption Si ii residual intensity at line center provides a valid lower limit on the gas covering fraction.
    Covering fractions from McKinney et al. 2019 and Gazagnes et al. 2018 are used for the fesc,Lyα-fcov anti-correlation; the paper itself cautions that fcov is a lower limit and may not capture absorption at other velocities (§2.2).
  • domain assumption The pooled sample of extreme-ionization GPs and previous GP samples is representative for Spearman rank correlations.
    Correlations combine 13 new targets with Yang et al. 2017a GPs despite differing selection cuts, S/N, and COS aperture sizes (§3.2, Appendix).
  • domain assumption Catastrophic cooling in massive compact super star clusters suppresses mechanical feedback at low metallicity and produces dense clumps with transparent inter-clump channels.
    The physical model of §3.2.4 and Figure 10 rests on Silich et al. 2004 and Silich & Tenorio-Tagle 2017; it is used to explain the Δv-metallicity correlation but is not directly tested with the new data.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of New Insights on Ly-alpha and Lyman Continuum Radiative Transfer in the Greenest Peas." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UEKSF6DV

@misc{pith2026190809763,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: New Insights on Ly-alpha and Lyman Continuum Radiative Transfer in the Greenest Peas},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UEKSF6DV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09763}
}
read the original abstract

As some of the only Lyman continuum (LyC) emitters at z~0, Green Pea (GP) galaxies are possible analogs of the sources that reionized the universe. We present HST COS spectra of 13 of the most highly ionized GPs, with [O III]/[O II]=6-35, and investigate correlations between Ly-alpha, galaxy properties, and low-ionization UV lines. Galaxies with high [O III]/[O II] have higher H-alpha equivalent widths (EWs), and high intrinsic Ly-alpha production may explain the prevalence of high Ly-alpha EWs among GPs. While Ly-alpha escape fraction is closely linked to low gas covering fractions, implying a clumpy gas geometry, narrow Ly-alpha velocity peak separation (delta_v,LyA) correlates with the ionization state, suggesting a density-bounded geometry. We therefore suggest that delta_v,LyA may trace the residual transparency of low-column-density pathways. Metallicity is associated with both [O III]/[O II] and delta_v,LyA. This trend may result from catastrophic cooling around low-metallicity star clusters, which generates a compact geometry of dense clouds within a low-density inter-clump medium. We find that the relative strength of low-ionization UV emission to absorption correlates with Ly-alpha emission strength and is related to Ly-alpha profile shape. However, as expected for optically thin objects, the GPs with the lowest delta_v,LyA show both weak low-ionization emission and weak absorption. The strengths of the low-ionization absorption and emission lines in a stacked spectrum do not correspond to any individual spectrum. Galaxies with high [O III]/[O II] contain a high fraction of LyC emitter candidates, but [O III]/[O II] alone is an insufficient diagnostic of LyC escape.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.09763 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The [O iii]/[O ii] ratios and Hα-derived SFRs (Kennicutt & Evans 2012) of the sample from GO-14080 (PI Jaskot; blue stars), compared with SDSS star-forming galaxies at z < 0.4 (black points) and previous GP COS samples. Green circles show the compilation of GPs from Yang et al. (2017a), and red diamonds show confirmed LCEs from Izotov et al. (2016a,b). The new GPs in this paper represent the most highly ionized star… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. SDSS g, r, i images of the sample, ordered by increasing redshift from left to right. The scale bar at the upper left indicates 500. Extended structure is visible in J1448-0110, J1509+3731, J0213+0056, and J1735+5703 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. COS NUV acquisition images of the sample, ordered by increasing redshift from left to right. The images are displayed using a logarithmic brightness scale. The scale bars in each image represent 1 kpc, and the circle is the 2.500 diameter aperture, centered on the image centroid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (15 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The Lyα profiles of GPs with high [O iii]/[O ii], normalized to the continuum level. We include 5 GPs from Jaskot & Oey (2014), Henry et al. (2015), and Yang et al. (2017a), which also have [O iii]/[O ii]> 6.6. The profiles are shown in order of increasing [O iii]/[O i…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Rest-frame UV spectra of high [O iii]/[O ii] GPs in order of decreasing fesc,Lyα. The label “(JO14)” identifies the four GPs from Jaskot & Oey (2014). Red dotted lines show the positions of resonant LIS lines, and blue dotted lines show the corresponding transitions to…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: fesc,Lyα correlates with Lyα EW. Hα EW, a measure of the intrinsic Lyα strength, is shown by the color scaling. Only GPs with net Lyα emission are shown. Representative errors are indicated by the error bar in the upper left. change reactions produce neutral O, which c…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) Lower ∆vLyα correlates with lower [O i] λ6300/Hβ. Color shows [O iii]/[O ii]. (b) Galaxies with lower gas-phase metallicities tend to have lower ∆vLyα. (c) ∆vLyα does not show any clear correlation with AV . The dotted line connects the two values of ∆vLyα for J080…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: ∆vLyα and fesc,Lyα anti-correlate, but with substantial scatter at low ∆vLyα. The dotted line connects the two values of ∆vLyα for J0808+1728. Representative error bars are shown in the lower left corner. (a) Color shows fcov. At a given ∆vLyα value, galaxies with lowe…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: An illustration of the proposed gas geometry at low vs. high metallicity. (a) At low metallicity, mechanical feedback is weaker, inducing catastrophic cooling. Thus, dense gas forms clumps and remains near the SSC. The high-density clumps have high ionization paramete…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a) The ratio of the flux at Lyα profile minimum to the continuum level (Fmin/Fcont) vs. ∆vLyα. Galaxies above the red dashed line have net flux above the continuum. The dotted line connects the measurements for each of J0808+1728’s blue peaks and associated minima. N…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: ∆vLyα vs. [O iii]/[O ii]. Red plus symbols show confirmed LyC emitters from Izotov et al. (2016a,b). Galaxies below the horizontal dashed line have ∆vLyα lower than or comparable to confirmed LCEs with fesc,LyC> 0.05 and may be more common at higher [O iii]/[O ii]. GP…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Rest-frame Hα EW vs. [O iii]/[O ii]. Galaxies with high [O iii]/[O ii] ratios also show high Hα EWs and consequently high intrinsic Lyα EWs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Energy level diagrams for the Si ii λ1260 and C ii λ1334 resonant transitions (dashed lines) and associated non￾resonant Si ii* and C ii* transitions (dotted lines). along with strong resonant absorption (e.g., J1509+3731 or J1457+2232). In these cases, Lyα emission a…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: LIS absorption and emission lines in high [O iii]/[O ii] GPs in order of decreasing fesc,Lyα. Labels are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: A continuation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Correlations between Lyα emission and EWnet, the sum of resonant absorption and non-resonant emission EWs with the same upper energy level. Top panels show correlations with Lyα EW, and bottom panels show correlations with fesc,Lyα. We show limits for galaxies where o…
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: (a). Stacked UV spectrum of the Lyα region. (b). Stacked UV spectrum (λ < 1220) of the 13 high-ionization GPs (black) and of the 10 with Lyα EW > 25˚A (gray), offset by 0.5 for clarity. (c) Stacked UV spectrum (λ > 1220) of the 13 high-ionization GPs (black) and of th…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A new technique for finding galaxies leaking Lyman-continuum radiation: [SII]-deficiency

    astro-ph.GA 2019-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Two of three [SII]-weak star-forming galaxies at redshift 0.3 show direct Lyman-continuum emission, supporting [SII]-deficiency as a new signpost for LyC escape.

  2. HST Imaging of the Ionizing Radiation from a Star-forming Galaxy at z = 3.794

    astro-ph.GA 2019-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    HST and VLT observations detect Lyman-continuum radiation escaping from a compact, off-center region of the z=3.794 galaxy Ion1, which unusually shows Lyman-alpha in absorption; a stack of 107 LBGs limits the average ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    " id="W5M0MpCehiHzreSzNTczkc9d

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

    work page arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    P., et al

    Ahn , C. P., et al. 2014, , 211, 17

    2014

  5. [5]

    O., P \'e rez-Montero , E., & V \' lchez , J

    Amor \' n , R. O., P \'e rez-Montero , E., & V \' lchez , J. M. 2010, , 715, L128

    2010

  6. [6]

    2009, , 502, 791

    Atek , H., Schaerer , D., & Kunth , D. 2009, , 502, 791

    2009

  7. [7]

    A., Phillips , M

    Baldwin , J. A., Phillips , M. M., & Terlevich , R. 1981, , 93, 5

    1981

  8. [8]

    Behrens , C., Dijkstra , M., & Niemeyer , J. C. 2014, , 563, A77

    2014

Show all 119 references
  1. [9]

    G., Arnberg , D., Masegosa , J., & \"O stlin , G

    Bergvall , N., Zackrisson , E., Andersson , B. G., Arnberg , D., Masegosa , J., & \"O stlin , G. 2006, , 448, 513

    2006

  2. [10]

    M., Leitherer , C., & Overzier , R

    Borthakur , S., Heckman , T. M., Leitherer , C., & Overzier , R. A. 2014, Science, 346, 216

    2014

  3. [11]

    2002, , 385, 454

    Boselli , A., Gavazzi , G., Lequeux , J., & Pierini , D. 2002, , 385, 454

    2002

  4. [12]

    S., & Larson , R

    Bromm , V., Coppi , P. S., & Larson , R. B. 1999, , 527, L5

    1999

  5. [13]

    2009, , 399, 1191

    Cardamone , C., et al. 2009, , 399, 1191

    2009

  6. [14]

    A., Clayton , G

    Cardelli , J. A., Clayton , G. C., & Mathis , J. S. 1989, , 345, 245

    1989

  7. [15]

    2018, , 860, 143

    Carr , C., Scarlata , C., Panagia , N., & Henry , A. 2018, , 860, 143

    2018

  8. [16]

    2015, , 801, L25

    Cen , R., & Kimm , T. 2015, , 801, L25

    2015

  9. [17]

    2018, , 616, A30

    Chisholm , J., et al. 2018, , 616, A30

    2018

  10. [18]

    I., Thuan , T

    Chisholm , J., Orlitov \'a , I., Schaerer , D., Verhamme , A., Worseck , G., Izotov , Y. I., Thuan , T. X., & Guseva , N. G. 2017, , 605, A67

    2017

  11. [19]

    K., Genzel , R., Townes , C

    Crawford , M. K., Genzel , R., Townes , C. H., & Watson , D. M. 1985, , 291, 755

    1985

  12. [20]

    A., et al

    Crowther , P. A., et al. 2016, , 458, 624

    2016

  13. [21]

    2016, , 828, 71

    Dijkstra , M., Gronke , M., & Venkatesan , A. 2016, , 828, 71

    2016

  14. [22]

    A., & Sutherland , R

    Dopita , M. A., & Sutherland , R. S. 2003, Astrophysics of the diffuse universe

    2003

  15. [23]

    J., Stanway , E

    Eldridge , J. J., Stanway , E. R., Xiao , L., McClelland , L. A. S., Taylor , G., Ng , M., Greis , S. M. L., & Bray , J. C. 2017, , 34, e058

    2017

  16. [24]

    R., & Shull , J

    Fernandez , E. R., & Shull , J. M. 2011, , 731, 20

    2011

  17. [25]

    L., et al

    Finkelstein , S. L., et al. 2015, , 810, 71

    2015

  18. [26]

    Fitzpatrick , E. L. 1999, , 111, 63

    1999

  19. [27]

    J., Robertson , B

    Fletcher , T. J., Robertson , B. E., Nakajima , K., Ellis , R. S., Stark , D. P., & Inoue , A. 2018, ArXiv e-prints

    2018

  20. [28]

    R., & Bayliss , M

    Gazagnes , S., Chisholm , J., Schaerer , D., Verhamme , A., Rigby , J. R., & Bayliss , M. 2018, , 616, A29

    2018

  21. [29]

    1996, , 466, 831

    Giavalisco , M., Koratkar , A., & Calzetti , D. 1996, , 466, 831

    1996

  22. [30]

    Gronke , M., Dijkstra , M., McCourt , M., & Oh , S. P. 2016, , 833, L26

    2016

  23. [31]

    2017, , 607, A71

    Gronke , M., Dijkstra , M., McCourt , M., & Peng Oh , S. 2017, , 607, A71

    2017

  24. [32]

    J., Oey , M

    Hanish , D. J., Oey , M. S., Rigby , J. R., de Mello , D. F., & Lee , J. C. 2010, , 725, 2029

    2010

  25. [33]

    Hansen , M., & Oh , S. P. 2006, , 367, 979

    2006

  26. [34]

    2015, , 812, 157

    Hashimoto , T., et al. 2015, , 812, 157

    2015

  27. [35]

    2013, , 765, L27

    Hayes , M., et al. 2013, , 765, L27

    2013

  28. [36]

    M., et al

    Heckman , T. M., et al. 2011, , 730, 5

    2011

  29. [37]

    M., Sembach , K

    Heckman , T. M., Sembach , K. R., Meurer , G. R., Leitherer , C., Calzetti , D., & Martin , C. L. 2001, , 558, 56

    2001

  30. [38]

    L., Woosley , S

    Heger , A., Fryer , C. L., Woosley , S. E., Langer , N., & Hartmann , D. H. 2003, , 591, 288

    2003

  31. [39]

    L., & Erb , D

    Henry , A., Scarlata , C., Martin , C. L., & Erb , D. 2015, , 809, 19

    2015

  32. [40]

    2002, , 336, 33

    Iglesias-P \'a ramo , J., & Mu \ n oz-Tu \ n \'o n , C. 2002, , 336, 33

    2002

  33. [41]

    K., Iwata , I., & Deharveng , J.-M

    Inoue , A. K., Iwata , I., & Deharveng , J.-M. 2006, , 371, L1

    2006

  34. [42]

    I., Guseva , N

    Izotov , Y. I., Guseva , N. G., Fricke , K. J., Henkel , C., & Schaerer , D. 2017 a , , 467, 4118

    2017

  35. [43]

    I., Guseva , N

    Izotov , Y. I., Guseva , N. G., & Thuan , T. X. 2011, , 728, 161

    2011

  36. [44]

    I., Orlitov \'a , I., Schaerer , D., Thuan , T

    Izotov , Y. I., Orlitov \'a , I., Schaerer , D., Thuan , T. X., Verhamme , A., Guseva , N. G., & Worseck , G. 2016 a , , 529, 178

    2016

  37. [45]

    I., Schaerer , D., Thuan , T

    Izotov , Y. I., Schaerer , D., Thuan , T. X., Worseck , G., Guseva , N. G., Orlitov \'a , I., & Verhamme , A. 2016 b , , 461, 3683

    2016

  38. [46]

    I., Schaerer , D., Worseck , G., Guseva , N

    Izotov , Y. I., Schaerer , D., Worseck , G., Guseva , N. G., Thuan , T. X., Verhamme , A., Orlitov \'a , I., & Fricke , K. J. 2018 a , , 474, 4514

    2018

  39. [47]

    I., Thuan , T

    Izotov , Y. I., Thuan , T. X., & Guseva , N. G. 2017 b , , 471, 548

    2017

  40. [48]

    I., Worseck , G., Schaerer , D., Guseva , N

    Izotov , Y. I., Worseck , G., Schaerer , D., Guseva , N. G., Thuan , T. X., Fricke , A., V., & Orlitov \'a , I. 2018 b , , 478, 4851

    2018

  41. [49]

    E., & Oey , M

    Jaskot , A. E., & Oey , M. S. 2013, , 766, 91

    2013

  42. [50]

    2014, , 791, L19

    ---. 2014, , 791, L19

    2014

  43. [51]

    E., Oey , M

    Jaskot , A. E., Oey , M. S., Scarlata , C., & Dowd , T. 2017, , 851, L9

    2017

  44. [52]

    A., Ellis , R

    Jones , T. A., Ellis , R. S., Schenker , M. A., & Stark , D. P. 2013, , 779, 52

    2013

  45. [53]

    2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1905.02480

    Kakiichi , K., & Gronke , M. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1905.02480

    2019 arXiv

  46. [54]

    P., Oey , M

    Keenan , R. P., Oey , M. S., Jaskot , A. E., & James , B. L. 2017, , 848, 12

    2017

  47. [55]

    C., & Evans , N

    Kennicutt , R. C., & Evans , N. J. 2012, , 50, 531

    2012

  48. [56]

    A., Sobral , D., Mobasher , B., Smail , I., Darvish , B., Nayyeri , H., Hemmati , S., & Stott , J

    Khostovan , A. A., Sobral , D., Mobasher , B., Smail , I., Darvish , B., Nayyeri , H., Hemmati , S., & Stott , J. P. 2016, , 463, 2363

    2016

  49. [57]

    R., & Thompson , T

    Krumholz , M. R., & Thompson , T. A. 2012, , 760, 155

    2012

  50. [58]

    M., Terlevich , E., Terlevich , R., Lequeux , J., & Fall , S

    Kunth , D., Mas-Hesse , J. M., Terlevich , E., Terlevich , R., Lequeux , J., & Fall , S. M. 1998, , 334, 11

    1998

  51. [59]

    Larson , R. B. 2005, , 359, 211

    2005

  52. [60]

    2013, , 553, A16

    Lebouteiller , V., Heap , S., Hubeny , I., & Kunth , D. 2013, , 553, A16

    2013

  53. [61]

    2013, , 553, A106

    Leitet , E., Bergvall , N., Hayes , M., Linn \'e , S., & Zackrisson , E. 2013, , 553, A106

    2013

  54. [62]

    C., Heckman , T

    Leitherer , C., Ferguson , H. C., Heckman , T. M., & Lowenthal , J. D. 1995, , 454, L19

    1995

  55. [63]

    C., & Oey , M

    Leitherer , C., Hernandez , S., Lee , J. C., & Oey , M. S. 2016, , 823, 64

    2016

  56. [64]

    Luridiana , V., Morisset , C., & Shaw , R. A. 2015, , 573, A42

    2015

  57. [65]

    Marks , M., Kroupa , P., Dabringhausen , J., & Pawlowski , M. S. 2012, , 422, 2246

    2012

  58. [66]

    M., Kunth , D., Tenorio-Tagle , G., Leitherer , C., Terlevich , R

    Mas-Hesse , J. M., Kunth , D., Tenorio-Tagle , G., Leitherer , C., Terlevich , R. J., & Terlevich , E. 2003, , 598, 858

    2003

  59. [67]

    McGaugh , S. S. 1991, , 380, 140

    1991

  60. [68]

    S., Yun , M., Dowd , T., & Lowenthal , J

    McKinney , J., Jaskot , A., Oey , M. S., Yun , M., Dowd , T., & Lowenthal , J. 2019, ApJ Submitted

    2019

  61. [69]

    S., Jaskot , A

    Micheva , G., Oey , M. S., Jaskot , A. E., & James , B. L. 2017, , 845, 165

    2017

  62. [70]

    S., Keenan , R

    Micheva , G., Oey , M. S., Keenan , R. P., Jaskot , A. E., & James , B. L. 2018, , 867, 2

    2018

  63. [71]

    E., Shapley , A

    Mostardi , R. E., Shapley , A. E., Steidel , C. C., Trainor , R. F., Reddy , N. A., & Siana , B. 2015, , 810, 107

    2015

  64. [72]

    P., Forrest , B., Oesch , P

    Naidu , R. P., Forrest , B., Oesch , P. A., Tran , K.-V. H., & Holden , B. P. 2018, , 478, 791

    2018

  65. [73]

    S., Iwata , I., Inoue , A

    Nakajima , K., Ellis , R. S., Iwata , I., Inoue , A. K., Kusakabe , H., Ouchi , M., & Robertson , B. E. 2016, , 831, L9

    2016

  66. [74]

    2014, , 442, 900

    Nakajima , K., & Ouchi , M. 2014, , 442, 900

    2014

  67. [75]

    S., Herrera , C

    Oey , M. S., Herrera , C. N., Silich , S., Reiter , M., James , B. L., Jaskot , A. E., & Micheva , G. 2017, , 849, L1

    2017

  68. [76]

    S., & Schaerer , D

    Orlitov \'a , I., Verhamme , A., Henry , A., Scarlata , C., Jaskot , A., Oey , M. S., & Schaerer , D. 2018, , 616, A60

    2018

  69. [77]

    E., & Ferland , G

    Osterbrock , D. E., & Ferland , G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    2006

  70. [78]

    2015, , 451, 2544

    Paardekooper , J.-P., Khochfar , S., & Dalla Vecchia , C. 2015, , 451, 2544

    2015

  71. [79]

    2017, , 129, 043001

    P \'e rez-Montero , E. 2017, , 129, 043001

    2017

  72. [80]

    X., Kasen , D., & Rubin , K

    Prochaska , J. X., Kasen , D., & Rubin , K. 2011, , 734, 24

    2011

  73. [81]

    2019, arXiv e-prints

    Ramachandran , V., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints

    2019

  74. [82]

    E., et al

    Rivera-Thorsen , T. E., et al. 2017 a , , 608, L4

    2017

  75. [83]

    2015, , 805, 14

    ---. 2015, , 805, 14

    2015

  76. [84]

    E., \"O stlin , G., Hayes , M., & Puschnig , J

    Rivera-Thorsen , T. E., \"O stlin , G., Hayes , M., & Puschnig , J. 2017 b , , 837, 29

    2017

  77. [85]

    E., Ellis , R

    Robertson , B. E., Ellis , R. S., Furlanetto , S. R., & Dunlop , J. S. 2015, , 802, L19

    2015

  78. [86]

    2016, Optimization of Lifetime Position 3 of the COS/FUV Detector , Tech

    Roman-Duval , J., et al. 2016, Optimization of Lifetime Position 3 of the COS/FUV Detector , Tech. rep

    2016

  79. [87]

    J., et al

    Rutkowski , M. J., et al. 2016, , 819, 81

    2016

  80. [88]

    2015, , 801, 43

    Scarlata , C., & Panagia , N. 2015, , 801, 43

    2015

  81. [89]

    I., Verhamme , A., Orlitov \'a , I., Thuan , T

    Schaerer , D., Izotov , Y. I., Verhamme , A., Orlitov \'a , I., Thuan , T. X., Worseck , G., & Guseva , N. G. 2016, , 591, L8

    2016

  82. [90]

    A., Ellis , R

    Schenker , M. A., Ellis , R. S., Konidaris , N. P., & Stark , D. P. 2014, , 795, 20

    2014

  83. [91]

    F., & Finkbeiner , D

    Schlafly , E. F., & Finkbeiner , D. P. 2011, , 737, 103

    2011

  84. [92]

    Schneider , F. R. N., et al. 2018, Science, 359, 69

    2018

  85. [93]

    E., Steidel , C

    Shapley , A. E., Steidel , C. C., Pettini , M., & Adelberger , K. L. 2003, , 588, 65

    2003

  86. [94]

    2014, , 788, 74

    Shibuya , T., et al. 2014, , 788, 74

    2014

  87. [95]

    M., Moloney , J., Danforth , C

    Shull , J. M., Moloney , J., Danforth , C. W., & Tilton , E. M. 2015, , 811, 3

    2015

  88. [96]

    2017, , 465, 1375

    Silich , S., & Tenorio-Tagle , G. 2017, , 465, 1375

    2017

  89. [97]

    2004, , 610, 226

    Silich , S., Tenorio-Tagle , G., & Rodr \' guez-Gonz \'a lez , A. 2004, , 610, 226

    2004

  90. [98]

    J., Crowther , P

    Smith , L. J., Crowther , P. A., Calzetti , D., & Sidoli , F. 2016, , 823, 38

    2016

  91. [99]

    P., Ellis , R

    Stark , D. P., Ellis , R. S., & Ouchi , M. 2011, , 728, L2

    2011

  92. [100]

    2015, , 576, A83

    Stasi \'n ska , G., Izotov , Y., Morisset , C., & Guseva , N. 2015, , 576, A83

    2015

  93. [101]

    C., Bogosavlevic , M., Shapley , A

    Steidel , C. C., Bogosavlevic , M., Shapley , A. E., Reddy , N. A., Rudie , G. C., Pettini , M., Trainor , R. F., & Strom , A. L. 2018, ArXiv e-prints

    2018

  94. [102]

    J., & Hummer , D

    Storey , P. J., & Hummer , D. G. 1995, , 272, 41

    1995

  95. [103]

    1998, , 502, L71

    St \"o rzer , H., & Hollenbach , D. 1998, , 502, L71

    1998

  96. [104]

    2002, , 123, 485

    Stoughton , C., et al. 2002, , 123, 485

    2002

  97. [105]

    E., Brown , J

    Sukhbold , T., Ertl , T., Woosley , S. E., Brown , J. M., & Janka , H. T. 2016, , 821, 38

    2016

  98. [106]

    R., et al

    Tanvir , N. R., et al. 2019, , 483, 5380

    2019

  99. [107]

    F., Strom , A

    Trainor , R. F., Strom , A. L., Steidel , C. C., & Rudie , G. C. 2016, , 832, 171

    2016

  100. [108]

    2016, , 825, 41

    Vanzella , E., et al. 2016, , 825, 41

    2016

  101. [109]

    2016, , 831, 38

    Vasei , K., et al. 2016, , 831, 38

    2016

  102. [110]

    2015, , 578, A7

    Verhamme , A., Orlitov \'a , I., Schaerer , D., & Hayes , M. 2015, , 578, A7

    2015

  103. [111]

    X., & Guseva , N

    Verhamme , A., Orlitov \'a , I., Schaerer , D., Izotov , Y., Worseck , G., Thuan , T. X., & Guseva , N. 2017, , 597, A13

    2017

  104. [112]

    S., de Koter , A., & Lamers , H

    Vink , J. S., de Koter , A., & Lamers , H. J. G. L. M. 2001, , 369, 574

    2001

  105. [113]

    S., & Walterbos , R

    Voges , E. S., & Walterbos , R. A. M. 2006, , 644, L29

    2006

  106. [114]

    H., & Cen , R

    Wise , J. H., & Cen , R. 2009, , 693, 984

    2009

  107. [115]

    M., Prochaska , J

    Wolfe , A. M., Prochaska , J. X., & Gawiser , E. 2003, , 593, 215

    2003

  108. [116]

    L., et al

    Wright , E. L., et al. 1991, , 381, 200

    1991

  109. [117]

    2017 a , , 844, 171

    Yang , H., et al. 2017 a , , 844, 171

    2017

  110. [118]

    E., Leitherer , C., Wofford , A., Jiang , T., & Wang , J

    Yang , H., Malhotra , S., Rhoads , J. E., Leitherer , C., Wofford , A., Jiang , T., & Wang , J. 2017 b , , 838, 4

    2017

  111. [119]

    S., Veilleux , S., & McDonald , M

    Zastrow , J., Oey , M. S., Veilleux , S., & McDonald , M. 2013, , 779, 76

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.