Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 75 references

Observation of stimulated Brillouin scattering in silicon nitride integrated waveguides

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read First measurement of backward stimulated Brillouin scattering in silicon nitride waveguides reports a 25 GHz gain peak, a photoelastic constant of |p12| = 0.047 ± 0.004, and an SBS threshold near 87 kW.

desk verdict First credible backward SBS measurement in Si3N4 waveguides, but the headline photoelastic constant and intrinsic gain are fitting outputs with unquantified model error. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.09815 v1 pith:XJK6ISQP submitted 2019-08-26 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Flavien Gyger , Junqiu Liu , Fan Yang , Jijun He , Arslan S. Raja , Rui Ning Wang , Sunil A. Bhave , Tobias J. Kippenberg
show 1 more author
Luc Thévenaz
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph
keywords stimulatedBrillouinscatteringsiliconnitrideintegratedphotonicsphotoelasticconstanthigh-overtonebulkacousticresonancesgainnonlinearopticsacousto-opticinteraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first observation of backward stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) in silicon nitride (Si3N4) waveguides fully cladded in silica. It measures the Brillouin gain spectrum and finds an unusual multi-peak structure caused by the hybridization of the acoustic mode with high-overtone bulk acoustic resonances of the silica cladding. It estimates the intrinsic Si3N4 Brillouin gain at 25 GHz as 7×$10^{-13}$ m/W and the photoelastic constant magnitude |p12| = 0.047 ± 0.004. Because SBS normally limits optical power, the high SBS threshold of about 87 kW explains why Si3N4 waveguides can handle high optical power, which is central for integrated nonlinear photonics such as soliton microcombs.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is a triple intensity modulation (TIM) measurement technique combined with 3D finite-element simulations of the acoustic eigenmodes. TIM cancels the Fabry-Perot cavity noise, Kerr-effect-induced background, and Raman background by using two counter-propagating, π-phase-shifted pump beams locked to a multiple of the cavity free spectral range, so that only the pump that is resonant with the probe contributes Brillouin gain. The simulations include the full waveguide cross-section with silica-air and silica-silicon boundaries and a perfectly matched layer, and they reproduce the multi-peak spectrum as hybridization with high-overtone bulk acoustic resonances (HBARs) of the silica cladding; the simulated eigenfrequencies are shifted by 220 MHz to match the measured spectrum.

What would settle it

Measure the Brillouin gain spectrum of a Si3N4 waveguide in which the top silica-air boundary is removed (e.g., a suspended or differently capped waveguide) or the cladding thickness is varied; if the multi-peak structure persists without the reflecting boundaries, the HBAR interpretation is wrong, and if the fitted |p12| changes with cladding, the photoelastic constant estimate is not intrinsic. Alternatively, measure the Si3N4 acoustic velocity independently (e.g., by picosecond ultrasonics) and check whether the 220 MHz simulation shift vanishes when using the measured sound velocity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that backward SBS occurs in the Si3N4 material itself, not in the silica cladding, and that its gain spectrum carries fingerprints of the cladding's finite thickness. The measured main Brillouin gain peak of (8±1)×$10^{-14}$ m/W at 25 GHz corresponds to an acoustic velocity of 10.5 km/s, consistent with literature values for Si3N4. The multi-peak structure is reproduced by finite-element simulations that treat the entire chip cross-section, showing that each peak is an acoustic supermode formed by hybridization with high-overtone bulk acoustic resonances reflecting from the top silica-air and bottom silica-silicon boundaries. Fitting the simulated peak heights to the measured spectrum yields |p12| = 0.047 ± 0.004, and the derived intrinsic gain of 7×$10^{-13}$ m/W is about 30 times smaller than silica's.

Load-bearing premise

The finite-element simulation relies on literature values for Si3N4's Young's modulus (280 GPa) and density (3100 kg/m3) and is shifted by 220 MHz to match the measured spectrum; if those acoustic parameters are wrong for this film, the mode assignment, the fitted |p12|, and the derived gain would be wrong.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Because the SBS threshold in Si3N4 is estimated at 87 kW, silicon nitride waveguides can handle much higher optical powers than silica fibers, supporting applications like soliton microcombs and supercontinuum generation.
  • The measured 25 GHz Brillouin shift is the largest reported on integrated platforms, offering a distinctive frequency scale for on-chip microwave photonics.
  • The reported photoelastic constant |p12| = 0.047 ± 0.004 provides the first reference for Si3N4 photoelasticity, enabling quantitative simulation of acousto-optic interactions in future Si3N4 devices.
  • The multi-peak gain structure arising from cladding boundaries implies that the Brillouin response of Si3N4 waveguides is not an intrinsic material property alone but is engineered by the surrounding cladding geometry.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The cladding-dependent HBAR hybridization suggests a design lever: by changing the SiO2 cladding thickness or the substrate boundary, one could tune the Brillouin spectrum to a single dominant line or suppress SBS entirely, which is not explicitly proposed by the paper.
  • The triple intensity modulation technique could be applied to other low-gain integrated platforms where Fabry-Perot and Kerr backgrounds mask weak Brillouin signals.
  • If the photoelastic constant is confirmed by an independent method, the 33-fold reduction relative to silica implies that materials engineering of p12, rather than just acoustic confinement, dominates SBS gain suppression in Si3N4.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first observation of backward stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) in fully cladded Si3N4 waveguides. Using a triple-intensity-modulation scheme to suppress Fabry-Pérot cavity noise, Kerr-induced probe modulation, and Raman background from fiber patchcords, the authors measure a Brillouin gain spectrum near 25 GHz with a main peak of (8±1)×10^-14 m/W and a linewidth of 390 MHz. They attribute the multi-peak structure to hybridization of the waveguide acoustic mode with high-overtone bulk acoustic resonances (HBARs) of the silica cladding, supported by FEM simulations. From fits of the simulated gain to the measured spectrum, they estimate the Si3N4 photoelastic constant |p12| = 0.047±0.004, and from Eq. (3) they estimate an intrinsic Si3N4 Brillouin gain of 7×10^-13 m/W and an SBS threshold of 87 kW in the 5-mm waveguide.

Significance. If the central claims hold, this is a valuable first measurement of backward SBS in a technologically important platform. The measurement technique itself is a notable experimental contribution: the TIM scheme quantitatively addresses three distinct noise sources that would otherwise bury the small Brillouin signal, and the direct comparison with silica-patchcord SBS provides an internal calibration. The derived quantities, however, are more model-dependent than the abstract suggests: |p12| is obtained by fitting an FEM model whose acoustic parameters are taken from the literature and whose eigenfrequencies require a 220 MHz correction, and the 'intrinsic' gain relies on an assumed splitting of the measured linewidth into material damping and phonon leakage. These caveats do not undermine the observation, but they need to be propagated into the error bars and clearly stated in the abstract and conclusions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Supplementary S3 and S4] The reported uncertainty |p12| = 0.047 ± 0.004 is propagated only from experimental parameters (PS, PP, ρpd, L), while Supplementary S3 explicitly states that 'the additional error caused by the simulation as well as the estimation of acoustic Q-factor ... is negligible.' This assumption is load-bearing because |p12| is extracted by adjusting the FEM-simulated Brillouin gain to the measured spectrum. Supplementary S4 further states that the simulated spectrum had to be shifted by 220 MHz because of 'a slight mismatch of parameters in the simulation, such as Young's modulus or density.' The authors should either quantify how uncertainties in the acoustic parameters propagate into |p12| and the intrinsic gain, or explicitly reframe these values as model-dependent estimates rather than measurement results.
  2. [Discussion, Eq. (3)] The intrinsic Si3N4 Brillouin gain of 7×10^-13 m/W is not directly measured. It is obtained by inserting the fitted |p12| into Eq. (3) together with the assumed material damping ΓM,Si3N4 = 5 ΓM,SiO2 and an overlap of η = 1. The measured linewidth of 390 MHz only determines the total damping ΓM + ΓL; the partition into equal material and leakage contributions relies on the ν_B^2 scaling relation and is not independently verified for this LPCVD film. If the film's acoustic damping differs from silica-scaled values, the estimated intrinsic gain changes accordingly. Please state this dependence explicitly or provide a sensitivity analysis over plausible ΓM values.
  3. [Fig. 3(b) and Supplementary S4] The mode assignment underlying the HBAR interpretation rests on a single uniform 220 MHz frequency shift applied to the simulated spectrum. If the true Young's modulus or density of the Si3N4 film differs from the literature values used in the simulation, the relative spacings and ordering of the hybridized peaks A–D would change non-uniformly, so the peak-to-eigenmode matching used to fit |p12| is not uniquely constrained. A concrete robustness test—repeating the eigenmode calculation and p12 fit for, e.g., ±5% variations in E and ρ—would materially strengthen the central claim.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence 'the Brillouin gain spectrum exhibits an unusual multi-peak structure resulting from hybridization with with high-overtone bulk acoustic resonances' contains a duplicated 'with' that should be removed.
  2. [Eq. (2)] The symbol L is used both for the waveguide length and for the lineshape function L(ν∆), which is confusing; consider using L_wg for the length or a different symbol for the lineshape.
  3. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption states that simulation results show 'eigenfrequency and gain for each eigenmode,' but the simulated spectrum is shifted by 220 MHz relative to the measurement; mentioning this shift in the main text and caption would improve transparency.
  4. [Supplementary S3] In the uncertainty table, the entry for L is described as 'waveguide effective length, including inverse nanotapers' with value '5 +0/−0.3 mm'; defining this quantity as L_eff in Eq. (12) would avoid ambiguity with the waveguide physical length.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The SBS observation is independent, but the paper's p12 fit is recycled into a 'theoretical' gain-reduction agreement, making that consistency check partly circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Discussion, Eq. (3) and Eq. (4); Supplementary S4]
    "By fitting the peak heights of the FEM simulation results to the measured gain spectrum, the estimated photoelastic constant magnitude |p12|, is obtained: |p12| = 0.047± 0.004 ... By substituting all these contributions to Eq. 3, we obtain a theoretical 342-times gain reduction in Si3N4 waveguides compared to single-mode fibers. The Brillouin gain value measured in our Si3N4 waveguide, in units m/W, is 250-times smaller than the silica intrinsic gain ... in agreement with the theoretical value derived above."

    Supplementary S4 states that 'The Si3N4 photoelastic constant p12 is adjusted to match the Brillouin gain obtained from our simulations to the measurement data.' Thus |p12| is a free parameter chosen so that the FEM peak heights reproduce the measured spectrum. Eq. 3 is then evaluated with that same fitted |p12| to produce a 'theoretical' 342x gain reduction, and this number is compared with the measured 250x reduction as if it were an independent check. The agreement is not independent: the fitted parameter was selected on the same spectrum, so the 'theoretical' gain reduction is constrained by the measured gain by construction.

full rationale

The central experimental claim — first observation of backward SBS near 25 GHz in fully cladded Si3N4 waveguides with a multi-peak HBAR spectrum — is self-contained and supported by the TIM measurement, the separation from the silica patchcord peak, and quantified noise budgets. The extracted |p12| is presented transparently as a fit, not as a prediction, so fitting alone is not circular. The genuine circular step is the consistency check: after adjusting p12 so the FEM gain matches the measured spectrum, the paper uses Eq. 3 with that same p12 to 'derive' a 342x gain reduction and finds it 'in agreement' with the measured 250x reduction. That agreement is partly forced by the fit. The intrinsic gain estimate, while model-dependent (it assumes ΓM,Si3N4 = 5 ΓM,SiO2 and eta=1), is better viewed as a corrected version of the measured waveguide gain rather than a re-expression of the fitted p12. The main unresolved risk is model uncertainty, not circularity: Supplementary S3 explicitly assumes simulation and acoustic-Q error are negligible, and Supplementary S4 applies a 220 MHz uniform frequency shift to align eigenmodes, attributing it to uncertain Young's modulus/density. These are correctness/robustness limitations and do not by themselves make the derivation circular. No load-bearing self-citation chain or uniqueness theorem is involved; citations to prior work are contextual. Score 4 reflects one in-sample fitted-parameter agreement while the core observation and spectrum remain independent.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. The main derived quantities (|p12| and intrinsic gain) rest on two fitted parameters: p12 and the 220 MHz simulation shift, plus literature acoustic properties and damping models. The central observation itself does not depend on these fits, but the quantitative interpretation does.

free parameters (2)
  • photoelastic constant |p12| = 0.047 +/- 0.004
    Adjusted in FEM simulations so that the simulated Brillouin gain matches the measured gain spectrum (Supplementary S4; Eq. 4 in main text).
  • simulation frequency shift = 220 MHz
    Applied to shift simulated eigenmode frequencies to match the measured spectrum (Supplementary S4). Likely compensates for uncertainty in Young's modulus or density.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Si3N4 acoustic properties can be represented by literature values (ESi3N4=280 GPa, rhoSi3N4=3100 kg/m3, and corresponding SiO2 values).
    FEM simulations in Supplementary S4 use these handbook values; the 220 MHz adjustment indicates uncertainty. The extracted p12 and HBAR mode attribution depend on them.
  • domain assumption Material damping in Si3N4 follows Gamma_M proportional to nu_B^2 relative to silica (Auld, Ref. [60]).
    Used in the Discussion to separate material damping from phonon leakage (Gamma_M,Si3N4 = 5 * Gamma_M,SiO2). If this scaling is wrong, the leakage estimate and intrinsic gain change.
  • domain assumption The measured 390 MHz linewidth is entirely due to the combined damping Gamma = Gamma_M + Gamma_L.
    Used to set Gamma in Eq. 3; assumes no significant inhomogeneous broadening or measurement artifact.
  • domain assumption The optical mode can be approximated as a transverse mode so that Eq. 3 with a single p12 applies.
    Stated in the Discussion before Eq. 3.
  • standard math Standard equations of elasticity and Maxwell's equations underpin the COMSOL FEM simulations.
    Unproved background used in all simulations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Observation of stimulated Brillouin scattering in silicon nitride integrated waveguides." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XJK6ISQP

@misc{pith2026190809815,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Observation of stimulated Brillouin scattering in silicon nitride integrated waveguides},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XJK6ISQP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.09815}
}
read the original abstract

Silicon nitride (Si3N4) has emerged as a promising material for integrated nonlinear photonics and has been used for broadband soliton microcombs and low-pulse-energy supercontinuum generation. Therefore understanding all nonlinear optical properties of Si3N4 is important. So far, only stimulated Brillouin scattering (SBS) has not been reported. Here we observe, for the first time, backward SBS in fully cladded Si3N4 waveguides. The Brillouin gain spectrum exhibits an unusual multi-peak structure resulting from hybridization with with high-overtone bulk acoustic resonances (HBARs) of the silica cladding. The reported intrinsic Si3N4 Brillouin gain at 25 GHz is estimated as 7x10^-13 m/W. Moreover, the magnitude of the Si3N4 photoelastic constant is estimated as |p12| = 0.047 +/- 0.004. Since SBS imposes an optical power limitation for waveguides, our results explain the capability of Si3N4 to handle high optical power, central for integrated nonlinear photonics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.09815 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. On-chip SBS in a Si3N4 waveguide. (a) Artist’s view of SBS in a Si3N4 waveguide. Note that the length of the inverse tapers is exaggerated for illustrative pur￾pose. The actual taper length is 300 µm, while the full length of the Si3N4 waveguide is 5 mm. White and blue shading rep￾resents the material density variation generated by SBS when the pump and probe beams overlay. Inset: false-color SEM of the waveguide cr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. High sensitivity SBS gain measurement scheme. (a) Measured waveguide transmission spectrum in function of the relative frequency starting at 193.55 THz. The frequency difference of the two pumps, νp2 − νp1, is a multiple of the chip FP cavity’s FSR (4 · νFSR). The two pumps are scanned together while the probe frequency ν0 is fixed. (b) Illustration of the gains due to Kerr effect (phase-to-intensity conversion) and… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Measurement and simulation results of Si3N4 Brillouin gain spectrum. (a) Measured signal in function of the pump-probe detuning frequency in logarithmic scale, showing the 1-m-long silica patchcord SBS to the left and Si3N4 SBS at 25 GHz, with more than three orders of magnitude difference. (b) Measured Si3N4 SBS gain spectrum, in agreement with the simulated eigenmodes (eigenfrequency and gain for each eigenmode). … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    aapmrev4-2.bst 2019-01-14 (MD) hand-edited version of aapmrev4-1.bst

    FUNCTION id.bst "aapmrev4-2.bst 2019-01-14 (MD) hand-edited version of aapmrev4-1.bst" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title tran...

    2019

  2. [2]

    aipnauth4-2.bst 2018-12-27 (MD) hand-edited version of apsauth4-1.bst

    FUNCTION id.bst "aipnauth4-2.bst 2018-12-27 (MD) hand-edited version of apsauth4-1.bst" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title tra...

    2018

  3. [3]

    aipnum4-2.bst 2019-01-14 (MD) hand-edited version of apsrev4-1.bst

    FUNCTION id.bst "aipnum4-2.bst 2019-01-14 (MD) hand-edited version of apsrev4-1.bst" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title transl...

    2019

  4. [4]

    apsrev4-2.bst 2019-01-14 (MD) hand-edited version of apsrev4-1.bst

    FUNCTION id.bst "apsrev4-2.bst 2019-01-14 (MD) hand-edited version of apsrev4-1.bst" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title transl...

    2019

  5. [5]

    apsrmp4-2.bst 2018-12-27 (MD) hand-edited version of apsrmp4-1.bst

    FUNCTION id.bst "apsrmp4-2.bst 2018-12-27 (MD) hand-edited version of apsrmp4-1.bst" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title transl...

    2018

  6. [6]

    author author D. J. \ Moss , author R. Morandotti , author A. L. \ Gaeta ,\ and\ author M. Lipson ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.183 journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 7 ,\ pages 597 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.183 2013

  7. [7]

    author author D. J. \ Blumenthal , author R. Heideman , author D. Geuzebroek , author A. Leinse ,\ and\ author C. Roeloffzen ,\ booktitle booktitle Proceedings of the IEEE ,\ https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2018.2861576 journal journal Proceedings of the IEEE \ volume 106 ,\ pages 2209 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    author author M. A. \ Foster , author A. C. \ Turner , author J. E. \ Sharping , author B. S. \ Schmidt , author M. Lipson ,\ and\ author A. L. \ Gaeta ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04932 journal journal Nature \ volume 441 ,\ pages 960 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/nature04932

Show all 75 references
  1. [9]

    Brasch , author Q.-F

    author author V. Brasch , author Q.-F. \ Chen , author S. Schiller ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.030786 journal journal Optics Express \ volume 22 ,\ pages 30786 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  2. [10]

    author author C. H. \ Henry , author R. F. \ Kazarinov , author H. J. \ Lee , author K. J. \ Orlowsky ,\ and\ author L. E. \ Katz ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.26.002621 journal journal Applied Optics \ volume 26 ,\ pages 2621 ( year 1987 ) NoStop

    doi

  3. [11]

    Luke , author A

    author author K. Luke , author A. Dutt , author C. B. \ Poitras ,\ and\ author M. Lipson ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.022829 journal journal Optics Express \ volume 21 ,\ pages 22829 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  4. [12]

    author author M. H. P. \ Pfeiffer , author C. Herkommer , author J. Liu , author T. Morais , author M. Zervas , author M. Geiselmann ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2018.2808258 journal journal IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Elect...

    2018

  5. [13]

    author author T. J. \ Kippenberg , author S. M. \ Spillane ,\ and\ author K. J. \ Vahala ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.083904 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 93 ,\ pages 083904 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  6. [14]

    author author T. J. \ Kippenberg , author A. L. \ Gaeta , author M. Lipson ,\ and\ author M. L. \ Gorodetsky ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan8083 journal journal Science \ volume 361 ,\ pages eaan8083 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  7. [15]

    Stern , author X

    author author B. Stern , author X. Ji , author Y. Okawachi , author A. L. \ Gaeta ,\ and\ author M. Lipson ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0598-9 journal journal Nature \ volume 562 ,\ pages 401 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  8. [16]

    author author A. S. \ Raja , author A. S. \ Voloshin , author H. Guo , author S. E. \ Agafonova , author J. Liu , author A. S. \ Gorodnitskiy , author M. Karpov , author N. G. \ Pavlov , author E. Lucas , author R. R. \ Galiev , author A. E. \ Shitikov , author J. D. \ Jost , ...

    doi

  9. [17]

    Liu , author E

    author author J. Liu , author E. Lucas , author A. S. \ Raja , author J. He , author J. Riemensberger , author R. N. \ Wang , author M. Karpov , author H. Guo , author R. Bouchand ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ http://arxiv.org/abs/1901.10372 journal journal arXiv \ volu...

    1901 arXiv

  10. [18]

    author author A. L. \ Gaeta , author M. Lipson ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-019-0358-x journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 13 ,\ pages 158 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  11. [19]

    Guo , author W

    author author H. Guo , author W. Weng , author J. Liu , author F. Yang , author W. Hansel , author C. S. \ Brès , author L. Thévenaz , author R. Holzwarth ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.00871 journal journal arXiv \ volume 1908.00871 ( year 201...

    1908 arXiv

  12. [20]

    author author J. S. \ Levy , author M. A. \ Foster , author A. L. \ Gaeta ,\ and\ author M. Lipson ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.011415 journal journal Optics Express \ volume 19 ,\ pages 11415 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  13. [21]

    Xue , author F

    author author X. Xue , author F. Leo , author Y. Xuan , author J. A. \ Jaramillo-Villegas , author P.-H. \ Wang , author D. E. \ Leaird , author M. Erkintalo , author M. Qi ,\ and\ author A. M. \ Weiner ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.253 journal journal Light: Science & A...

    doi

  14. [22]

    Karpov , author H

    author author M. Karpov , author H. Guo , author A. Kordts , author V. Brasch , author M. H. P. \ Pfeiffer , author M. Zervas , author M. Geiselmann ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.103902 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ vo...

    doi

  15. [23]

    author author B. J. \ Eggleton , author C. G. \ Poulton , author P. T. \ Rakich , author M. J. \ Steel ,\ and\ author G. Bahl ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-019-0498-z journal journal Nature Photonics \ ,\ pages 1 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi

  16. [24]

    author author A. H. \ Safavi-Naeini , author D. V. \ Thourhout , author R. Baets ,\ and\ author R. V. \ Laer ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.6.000213 journal journal Optica \ volume 6 ,\ pages 213 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  17. [25]

    author author G. S. \ Wiederhecker , author P. Dainese ,\ and\ author T. P. \ Mayer Alegre ,\ https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.5088169 journal journal APL Photonics \ volume 4 ,\ pages 071101 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  18. [26]

    author author D. R. \ Ponikvar \ and\ author S. Ezekiel ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.6.000398 journal journal Optics Letters \ volume 6 ,\ pages 398 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

    1981 doi

  19. [27]

    author author M. S. \ Kang , author A. Nazarkin , author A. Brenn ,\ and\ author P. S. J. \ Russell ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1217 journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 5 ,\ pages 276 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  20. [28]

    Pang , author X

    author author M. Pang , author X. Jiang , author W. He , author G. K. L. \ Wong , author G. Onishchukov , author N. Y. \ Joly , author G. Ahmed , author C. R. \ Menyuk ,\ and\ author P. S. J. \ Russell ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.2.000339 journal journal Optica \ volume ...

    doi

  21. [29]

    \ Beugnot , author S

    author author J.-C. \ Beugnot , author S. Lebrun , author G. Pauliat , author H. Maillotte , author V. Laude ,\ and\ author T. Sylvestre ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6242 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 5 ,\ pages 5242 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi

  22. [30]

    Florez , author P

    author author O. Florez , author P. F. \ Jarschel , author Y. a. V. \ Espinel , author C. M. B. \ Cordeiro , author T. P. \ Mayer Alegre , author G. S. \ Wiederhecker ,\ and\ author P. Dainese ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11759 journal journal Nature Communications \ volum...

    doi

  23. [31]

    author author I. S. \ Grudinin , author A. B. \ Matsko ,\ and\ author L. Maleki ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.043902 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 102 ,\ pages 043902 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  24. [32]

    Tomes \ and\ author T

    author author M. Tomes \ and\ author T. Carmon ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.113601 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 102 ,\ pages 113601 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  25. [33]

    Lee , author T

    author author H. Lee , author T. Chen , author J. Li , author K. Y. \ Yang , author S. Jeon , author O. Painter ,\ and\ author K. J. \ Vahala ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.109 journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 6 ,\ pages 369 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  26. [34]

    author author K. Y. \ Yang , author D. Y. \ Oh , author S. H. \ Lee , author Q.-F. \ Yang , author X. Yi , author B. Shen , author H. Wang ,\ and\ author K. Vahala ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-018-0132-5 journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 12 ,\ pages 297 ( year 201...

    doi

  27. [35]

    Pant , author C

    author author R. Pant , author C. G. \ Poulton , author D.-Y. \ Choi , author H. Mcfarlane , author S. Hile , author E. Li , author L. Th \'e venaz , author B. Luther-Davies , author S. J. \ Madden ,\ and\ author B. J. \ Eggleton ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.008285 journal...

    doi

  28. [36]

    Morrison , author A

    author author B. Morrison , author A. Casas-Bedoya , author G. Ren , author K. Vu , author Y. Liu , author A. Zarifi , author T. G. \ Nguyen , author D.-Y. \ Choi , author D. Marpaung , author S. J. \ Madden , author A. Mitchell ,\ and\ author B. J. \ Eggleton ,\ https://doi.o...

    doi

  29. [37]

    Shin , author W

    author author H. Shin , author W. Qiu , author R. Jarecki , author J. A. \ Cox , author R. H. \ Olsson Iii , author A. Starbuck , author Z. Wang ,\ and\ author P. T. \ Rakich ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2943 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 4 ,\ pages 1944 (...

    doi

  30. [38]

    Van Laer , author B

    author author R. Van Laer , author B. Kuyken , author D. Van Thourhout ,\ and\ author R. Baets ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015.11 journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 9 ,\ pages 199 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  31. [39]

    Liu , author H

    author author Q. Liu , author H. Li ,\ and\ author M. Li ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.6.000778 journal journal Optica \ volume 6 ,\ pages 778 ( year 2019 b ) NoStop

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    author author K. Y. \ Song , author M. G. \ Herr \'a ez ,\ and\ author L. Th \'e venaz ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OPEX.13.000082 journal journal Optics Express \ volume 13 ,\ pages 82 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    2005 doi

  33. [41]

    Okawachi , author M

    author author Y. Okawachi , author M. S. \ Bigelow , author J. E. \ Sharping , author Z. Zhu , author A. Schweinsberg , author D. J. \ Gauthier , author R. W. \ Boyd ,\ and\ author A. L. \ Gaeta ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.153902 journal journal Physical Review L...

    doi

  34. [42]

    Marpaung , author B

    author author D. Marpaung , author B. Morrison , author M. Pagani , author R. Pant , author D.-Y. \ Choi , author B. Luther-Davies , author S. J. \ Madden ,\ and\ author B. J. \ Eggleton ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.2.000076 journal journal Optica \ volume 2 ,\ pages 76 (...

    doi

  35. [43]

    Li , author X

    author author J. Li , author X. Yi , author H. Lee , author S. A. \ Diddams ,\ and\ author K. J. \ Vahala ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1252909 journal journal Science \ volume 345 ,\ pages 309 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  36. [44]

    Loh , author J

    author author W. Loh , author J. Becker , author D. C. \ Cole , author A. Coillet , author F. N. \ Baynes , author S. B. \ Papp ,\ and\ author S. A. \ Diddams ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/18/4/045001 journal journal New Journal of Physics \ volume 18 ,\ pages 045001 ( ...

    doi

  37. [45]

    Gundavarapu , author G

    author author S. Gundavarapu , author G. M. \ Brodnik , author M. Puckett , author T. Huffman , author D. Bose , author R. Behunin , author J. Wu , author T. Qiu , author C. Pinho , author N. Chauhan , author J. Nohava , author P. T. \ Rakich , author K. D. \ Nelson , author M...

    doi

  38. [46]

    Li , author M.-G

    author author J. Li , author M.-G. \ Suh ,\ and\ author K. Vahala ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.4.000346 journal journal Optica \ volume 4 ,\ pages 346 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  39. [47]

    author author M. S. \ Kang , author A. Butsch ,\ and\ author P. S. J. \ Russell ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2011.180 journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 5 ,\ pages 549 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  40. [48]

    Pang , author W

    author author M. Pang , author W. He , author X. Jiang ,\ and\ author P. S. J. \ Russell ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.102 journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 10 ,\ pages 454 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  41. [49]

    Antman , author A

    author author Y. Antman , author A. Clain , author Y. London ,\ and\ author A. Zadok ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.3.000510 journal journal Optica \ volume 3 ,\ pages 510 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  42. [50]

    author author R. G. \ Smith ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.11.002489 journal journal Applied Optics \ volume 11 ,\ pages 2489 ( year 1972 ) NoStop

    1972 doi

  43. [51]

    Dehghannasiri , author A

    author author R. Dehghannasiri , author A. A. \ Eftekhar ,\ and\ author A. Adibi ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.96.053836 journal journal Physical Review A \ volume 96 ,\ pages 053836 ( year 2017 a ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  44. [52]

    Dehghannasiri , author A

    author author R. Dehghannasiri , author A. A. \ Eftekhar ,\ and\ author A. Adibi ,\ in\ https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCon.2017.8116038 booktitle 2017 IEEE Photonics Conference ( IPC ) \ ( year 2017 )\ pp.\ pages 135--136 NoStop

    2017

  45. [53]

    author author V. R. \ Almeida , author R. R. \ Panepucci ,\ and\ author M. Lipson ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.28.001302 journal journal Optics Letters \ volume 28 ,\ pages 1302 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003 doi

  46. [54]

    Liu , author A

    author author J. Liu , author A. S. \ Raja , author M. H. P. \ Pfeiffer , author C. Herkommer , author H. Guo , author M. Zervas , author M. Geiselmann ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.43.003200 journal journal Optics Letters \ volume 43 ,\ pages...

    doi

  47. [55]

    author author C. G. \ Poulton , author R. Pant ,\ and\ author B. J. \ Eggleton ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.30.002657 journal journal Journal of the Optical Society of America B \ volume 30 ,\ pages 2657 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  48. [56]

    Dainese , author P

    author author P. Dainese , author P. S. J. \ Russell , author N. Joly , author J. Knight , author G. Wiederhecker , author H. L. \ Fragnito , author V. Laude ,\ and\ author A. Khelif ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys315 journal journal Nature Physics \ volume 2 ,\ pages 388 ( y...

    doi

  49. [58]

    author author W. T. \ Grubbs \ and\ author R. A. \ MacPhail ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1144743 journal journal Review of Scientific Instruments \ volume 65 ,\ pages 34 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    1994 doi

  50. [59]

    Marowsky \ and\ author G

    author author G. Marowsky \ and\ author G. L \"u pke ,\ https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00332324 journal journal Applied Physics B \ volume 51 ,\ pages 49 ( year 1990 ) NoStop

    1990 doi

  51. [60]

    author author R. W. \ Boyd ,\ @noop title Nonlinear optics \ ( publisher Elsevier ,\ year 2008 )\ pp.\ pages 436--440 NoStop

    2008

  52. [61]

    Gyger , author Z

    author author F. Gyger , author Z. Yang , author M. A. \ Soto , author F. Yang , author K. H. \ Tow ,\ and\ author L. Th \'e venaz ,\ in\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OFS.2018.ThE69 booktitle Optical Fiber Sensors \ ( organization Optical Society of America ,\ year 2018 )\ p.\ page...

    2018 doi

  53. [62]

    Xuan , author Y

    author author Y. Xuan , author Y. Liu , author L. T. \ Varghese , author A. J. \ Metcalf , author X. Xue , author P.-H. \ Wang , author K. Han , author J. A. \ Jaramillo-Villegas , author A. A. \ Noman , author C. Wang , author S. Kim , author M. Teng , author Y. J. \ Lee , au...

    doi

  54. [63]

    Wolff , author R

    author author C. Wolff , author R. Soref , author C. Poulton ,\ and\ author B. Eggleton ,\ https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.030735 journal journal Optics Express \ volume 22 ,\ pages 30735 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  55. [64]

    Chen , author N

    author author H. Chen , author N. F. \ Opondo , author B. Jiang , author E. R. \ MacQuarrie , author R. S. \ Daveau , author S. A. \ Bhave ,\ and\ author G. D. \ Fuchs ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.06309 journal journal arXiv \ volume 1906.06309 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    1906 arXiv

  56. [65]

    author author B. A. \ Auld ,\ @noop title Acoustic fields and waves in solids \ ( publisher Ripol Klassik ,\ year 1973 ) NoStop

    1973

  57. [67]

    title Solitons and dynamics of frequency comb formation in optical microresonators

    author Herr, T. title Solitons and dynamics of frequency comb formation in optical microresonators . type Tech. Rep. , institution EPFL ( year 2013 ). ://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/188349?ln=fr

    2013

  58. [68]

    author Saleh, B. E. A. & author Teich, M. C. title Fundamentals of Photonics; 2nd ed. Wiley series in pure and applied optics ( publisher Wiley , address New York, NY , year 2007 )

    2007

  59. [69]

    author Stolen, R. H. , author Gordon, J. P. , author Tomlinson, W. & author Haus, H. A. title Raman response function of silica-core fibers . journal Journal of the Optical Society of America B volume 6 , pages 1159--1166 ( year 1989 ). ://www.osapublishing.org/josab/abstract....

    1989

  60. [70]

    , author Dutt, A

    author Luke, K. , author Dutt, A. , author Poitras, C. B. & author Lipson, M. title Overcoming Si_3N_4 film stress limitations for high quality factor ring resonators . journal Optics Express volume 21 , pages 22829--22833 ( year 2013 ). ://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?U...

    2013

  61. [71]

    author Xuan, Y. et al. title High- Q silicon nitride microresonators exhibiting low-power frequency comb initiation . journal Optica volume 3 , pages 1171--1180 ( year 2016 ). ://www.osapublishing.org/optica/abstract.cfm?URI=optica-3-11-1171

    2016

  62. [72]

    author Liu, J. et al. title Ultralow-power chip-based soliton microcombs for photonic integration . journal Optica volume 5 , pages 1347--1353 ( year 2018 ). ://www.osapublishing.org/optica/abstract.cfm?URI=optica-5-10-1347

    2018

  63. [73]

    author Liu, J. et al. title Double inverse nanotapers for efficient light coupling to integrated photonic devices . journal Optics Letters volume 43 , pages 3200--3203 ( year 2018 ). ://ol.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-43-14-3200

    2018

  64. [74]

    author Raja, A. S. et al. title Packaged photonic chip-based soliton microcomb using an ultralow-noise laser . journal arXiv volume 1906.03194 ( year 2019 ). ://arxiv.org/abs/1906.03194

    1906 arXiv

  65. [75]

    author Pierson, H. O. title Handbook of chemical vapor deposition: principles, technology and applications , chap. chapter 10 , pages 281 ( publisher William Andrew , year 1999 )

    1999

  66. [76]

    author Qiu, W. et al. title Stimulated Brillouin scattering in nanoscale silicon step-index waveguides: a general framework of selection rules and calculating SBS gain . journal Optics Express volume 21 , pages 31402--31419 ( year 2013 ). ://www.osapublishing.org/oe/abstract.c...

    2013

  67. [77]

    author Boyd, R. W. , author Rzazewski, K. & author Narum, P. title Noise initiation of stimulated Brillouin scattering . journal Physical Review A volume 42 , pages 5514 ( year 1990 ). ://journals.aps.org/pra/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevA.42.5514

    1990 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.