Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 128 references

ALMA observations of fragmentation, sub-structure, and protostars in high-mass starless clump candidates

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read ALMA observations of twelve high-mass starless clump candidates show that fragmentation occurs at the thermal Jeans length and that 11 of 12 such clumps already contain low-luminosity protostars.

desk verdict A careful ALMA survey showing that supposedly quiescent massive clumps mostly already host low-mass protostars, with fragmentation at the thermal Jeans length; the deprojection assumption is soft but not load-bearing. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.10374 v1 pith:UGV6TVPH submitted 2019-08-27 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR

Brian E. Svoboda , Yancy L. Shirley , Alessio Traficante , Cara Battersby , Gary A. Fuller , Qizhou Zhang , Henrik Beuther , Nicolas Peretto
show 2 more authors
Crystal Brogan Todd Hunter
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.SR
keywords high-massstarformationstarlessclumpcandidatesthermalJeanslengthfragmentationmolecularoutflowsprotostarsALMAinfrareddarkclouds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper presents a high-resolution millimeter survey of twelve massive clumps that previous surveys flagged as starless, and asks whether such clumps really are quiescent and how they fragment. After correcting the projected separations of the 67 detected sub-structures for geometry, the authors find a median nearest-neighbor spacing of $0.82\,\lambda_{\mathrm{j,th}}$ with 63.3% of separations below one thermal Jeans length. They conclude that the dense gas in these clumps fragments on the thermal Jeans scale, with turbulence and magnetic fields providing only modest support. At the same time, CO and SiO outflows reveal previously undetected low-luminosity protostars in 11 of the 12 clumps, indicating that current infrared surveys miss substantial early star formation. If correct, the results narrow the window in which truly starless massive clumps exist and put the initial fragment spacing of high-mass cluster formation at the thermal Jeans scale.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing quantity is the thermal Jeans length $\lambda_{\mathrm{j,th}} = (\pi c_s^2 / G \rho_0)^{1/2}$, the minimum wavelength for gravitational fragmentation of a uniform isothermal medium; for these clumps it ranges from about 0.10 to 0.17 pc. The measurement chain is a dendrogram segmentation of the ALMA continuum maps that extracts 67 sub-structures, followed by Monte Carlo trials that assign plausible line-of-sight offsets to isolated sources and filament-like inclinations to branch-linked sources, yielding projection-corrected nearest-neighbor separation distributions that are then scaled by each clump's thermal Jeans length. This construction translates a two-dimensional image of clustered cores into a statistical statement about the intrinsic three-dimensional fragmentation scale.

What would settle it

Measure line-of-sight distances directly, for example by fitting dense-gas tracers such as NH3 or N2H+ emission to obtain velocities and solve for the three-dimensional distribution of the sub-structures in a few clumps. If the real line-of-sight spread is much larger than the assumed 0.15 pc Gaussian, or the filament inclinations differ from the Monte Carlo priors, the median $\delta_{\mathrm{nns}}/\lambda_{\mathrm{j,th}}$ will shift away from 0.82, and the ensemble may instead match the turbulent or cylindrical Jeans scale of roughly 3 $\lambda_{\mathrm{j,th}}$; that direct comparison would settle the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that fragmentation in high-mass starless clump candidates is controlled by the thermal Jeans length, not by turbulent or magnetic support. In the ALMA 1.3 mm maps, 67 dense sub-structures are extracted with a dendrogram; the nearest-neighbor separations, after Monte Carlo de-projection, have an ensemble median $\delta_{\mathrm{nns}}/\lambda_{\mathrm{j,th}} = 0.82$ with a (25,75) percentile interval of $0.52$–$1.25$, and 63.3% of separations fall below one thermal Jeans length. The same data show that 11 of the 12 clumps host embedded low- or intermediate-luminosity protostars, traced by 16 bipolar CO outflows and 4 SiO outflows, and that unresolved continuum sources are poorly fit by starless-core radiative-transfer models. Two resolved cores in G28539 are well fit as starless cores, one with a model mass near $29\,M_\odot$, leaving that clump as the only true starless candidate in the sample. The authors interpret the ensemble of results as evidence for hierarchical fragmentation in which the highest-density gas fragments thermally before high-mass protostars form.

Load-bearing premise

The entire fragmentation-scale conclusion depends on the assumed three-dimensional layout of the sources: isolated sources are modeled with a line-of-sight Gaussian spread of 0.15 pc and dendrogram-linked sources are modeled as filaments with a common inclination capped at a 0.6 pc deprojected length, so if the true geometry differs, the deprojected separations that match the Jeans length could be significantly biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If fragmentation is thermal, the initial spacing of massive protocluster cores is set by temperature and density alone, and the thermal Jeans mass of about $1\,M_\odot$ aligns naturally with the peak of the stellar initial mass function.
  • Catalog-level 70 µm 'starless' classifications are not reliable: 11 of 12 such clumps show outflow or compact-source evidence of protostars, so any quiescence claim needs high-resolution millimeter follow-up.
  • A 'low-mass first' formation route becomes plausible: initially low- to intermediate-mass protostars accrete from the surrounding clump, so high-mass stars need not begin as massive monolithic starless cores.
  • The bimodal separation distribution and second-nearest-neighbor spacings near the Jeans length support hierarchical fragmentation, with clump-scale cylindrical fragmentation followed by core-scale thermal Jeans fragmentation.
  • G28539, the sole remaining starless candidate, with its two well-fit high-mass starless core candidates, is the best current target for studying the pre-stellar initial conditions of a massive protocluster.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the assumed projection geometry is close to right, a testable extension is that dense-gas kinematics (e.g., from N2H+ or NH3) should show velocity structure coherent on the Jeans scale, allowing the Monte Carlo correction to be replaced by direct line-of-sight measurements.
  • The frequent sub-Jeans separations could mean some pairs are still moving together during collapse or that projection correction underestimates clustered sources; comparing relative velocities of close pairs would distinguish contraction and merging from a static fragmented hierarchy.
  • A similar survey of lower-mass or more distant 70-µm-dark clumps would test whether thermal-Jeans fragmentation is universal among massive starless clumps or only characteristic of the most massive, high-column-density subset studied here.
  • If the outflow detection rate holds, a quantitative prediction is that roughly 90% of nominally starless massive clumps observed at this resolution and sensitivity will show low-luminosity protostars, shrinking the estimated population of genuinely quiescent massive clumps.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. Svoboda et al. present ALMA 1.3 mm continuum and spectral line observations of 12 high-mass starless clump candidates (SCCs) selected from BGPS and IRDC surveys. They identify 67 dendrogram sub-structures, detect CO/SiO bipolar outflows toward 11 of 12 clumps, and compare selected continuum sources with RADMC-3D starless core models. The central fragmentation analysis measures nearest neighbor separations among the sub-structures, applies a Monte Carlo deprojection with explicit assumptions for isolated and grouped sources, and compares the results to the clump-average thermal Jeans length computed from ATLASGAL 870 μm flux densities with propagated uncertainties. The ensemble median projection-corrected separation is δ_nns/λ_j,th = 0.82 (25–75% percentile interval 0.52–1.25), and the CDF shows 63.3% of separations below one thermal Jeans length, supporting fragmentation at the thermal Jeans scale.

Significance. This is one of the first systematic ALMA surveys of high-mass starless clump candidates at ~3000 au resolution. If the result holds, it provides a robust observational constraint that fragmentation at the clump scale occurs near the thermal Jeans length rather than the turbulent or cylindrical Jeans scale, with implications for the initial conditions of high-mass star and cluster formation. The paper is careful in several respects: point-source completeness and model recovery are quantified, the Monte Carlo propagation of uncertainties in distances, dust temperatures, and densities is well described, the limitations of single-wavelength temperature assumptions and of the starless core model grid are stated explicitly, and the authors refrain from overinterpreting unresolved cores as definitively protostellar. The discovery of low-luminosity protostars in 11 of 12 supposed starless clumps is a significant empirical result that cautions against relying on MIR/FIR survey completeness for identifying truly quiescent clumps.

minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.4 and §5.1] The paper first reports 67 sub-structures in §2.4, but §5.1 gives 17 isolated and 49 grouped sources, which sum to 66. Since G23605 is excluded from the nearest-neighbor analysis, please state explicitly that 66 of the 67 sources are used, or correct the counts, so the ensemble statistics in Figure 13 can be verified.
  2. [§5.2 and §4.4] The sentence 'Replacing cs with cs,e_ff in Equation 5.2' appears to refer to Eq. (4) for the thermal Jeans length, not to a numbered Eq. (5.2); similarly, §4.4 refers to 'Equation 4.4' when comparing to Eq. (2). Please correct the equation cross-references.
  3. [§5.1] The deprojection scheme is explicitly labeled 'simple and imperfect'; because the numerical medians in Figure 13 depend on the assumed σ_z and D, a brief quantitative robustness check (e.g., varying σ_z and D over plausible ranges, in addition to the already-given uniform-sphere comparison) would help readers assess how sensitive the median δ_nns/λ_j,th is to the prior.
  4. [§7] In the conclusions, the statement 'sensitivity ( 50 µJy beam−1) sufficient...' contains a stray opening parenthesis and does not specify that this is the 1σ RMS noise level; please rephrase, e.g., 'with 1σ RMS sensitivity of ~50 µJy beam−1'.
  5. [§4.4] The phrase 'This ultimately provides a more conservative criteria for rejecting poor fits' is ambiguous: if the Bayesian likelihood is too stringent, the ∆χ²_r < 3 heuristic is presumably less stringent (more permissive). Please reword to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Jeans-length comparison is an independent external benchmark, not a fitted or self-referential result.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that projection-corrected nearest-neighbor separations among dendrogram sub-structures are consistent with the clump-average thermal Jeans length. The Jeans length (Eq. 4) is computed from the isothermal sound speed and a volume density rho0 = 3Sigma/4R, where Sigma comes from ATLASGAL 870 micron fluxes in a 27 arcsec aperture (Eq. 5) and the authors sample Td = 12 +/- 2 K and distance DPDFs. This density input is independent of the ALMA 1.3 mm source positions used for the separations, so the comparison is not a fit or a definitional identity. The projected median separation (0.083 pc = 0.61 lambda_j,th) and the alternative uniform-sphere deprojection (0.153 pc = 1.13 lambda_j,th) bracket the claimed range, showing the Monte Carlo deprojection prior (sigma_z = 0.15 pc, D = 0.6 pc) is not load-bearing. Section 5.1 explicitly labels the correction 'simple and imperfect,' which is a modeling limitation, not circularity. The protostellar classification of unresolved cores is based on poor fits to starless models; the paper itself notes that more extreme starless models could fit (Section 4.4), and this inference does not feed back into the separation analysis. Self-citations (Svoboda et al. 2016; Traficante et al. 2015) supply the sample and clump properties but not the fragmentation-length conclusion. No equation reduces to its own input; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Therefore no circular steps are identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard ISM assumptions (dust opacities, dust-to-gas ratio, Plummer density profiles), a specific temperature assumption for Jeans length and mass calculations, and a hand-tuned projection correction. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Projection correction sigma_z = 0.15 pc
    Set in Section 5.1 so the 2-sigma line-of-sight spread equals the 0.6 pc diameter inferred from 8 um extinction maps; used to deproject nearest neighbor separations.
  • Grouped source maximum extent D = 0.6 pc
    Also from Section 5.1, limiting the allowed inclination for dendrogram-grouped sources; affects the projection-corrected separations.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Grain opacity and dust-to-gas ratio: kappa(1.3 mm)=0.90 cm2/g, dust-to-gas mass ratio 1/110, mean molecular weight 2.33.
    Adopted in Section 4 and Appendix C to convert continuum flux to mass; values from Ossenkopf & Henning 1994 and standard ISM composition.
  • domain assumption Starless cores are externally heated Plummer spheres (Eq. 1).
    The starless core model grid in Section 4.1 assumes this density profile and no central heating source; this is the basis for interpreting unresolved cores as protostellar when the profile fails to fit.
  • domain assumption Dust temperature equals gas kinetic temperature, T_d = T_K = 12 K, for mass and Jeans length estimates.
    Used in Sections 2.2.1 and 5.2; the authors sample T_d as 12 ± 2 K for the Jeans length, but deviations outside this range would shift masses and Jeans lengths.
  • ad hoc to paper Line-of-sight projection correction scheme (Section 5.1).
    The Monte Carlo deprojection draws isolated sources from a Gaussian with sigma_z=0.15 pc and groups sources with common inclination and D=0.6 pc; these choices are specific to this paper and directly affect the reported separations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of ALMA observations of fragmentation, sub-structure, and protostars in high-mass starless clump candidates." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UGV6TVPH

@misc{pith2026190810374,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: ALMA observations of fragmentation, sub-structure, and protostars in high-mass starless clump candidates},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UGV6TVPH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.10374}
}
abstract

(Abridged) The initial physical conditions of high-mass stars and protoclusters remain poorly characterized. To this end we present the first targeted ALMA 1.3mm continuum and spectral line survey towards high-mass starless clump candidates, selecting a sample of 12 of the most massive candidates ($400-4000\, M_\odot$) within 5 kpc. The joint 12+7m array maps have a high spatial resolution of $\sim 3000\, \mathrm{au}$ ($\sim 0.8^{\prime\prime}$) and have point source mass-completeness down to $\sim 0.3\, M_\odot$ at $6\sigma$ (or $1\sigma$ column density sensitivity of $1.1\times10^{22}\, \mathrm{cm^{-2}}$). We discover previously undetected signposts of low-luminosity star formation from CO (2-1) and SiO (5-4) bipolar outflows and other signatures towards 11 out of 12 clumps, showing that current MIR/FIR Galactic Plane surveys are incomplete to low- and intermediate-mass protostars ($\lesssim 50\, L_\odot$). We compare a subset of the observed cores with a suite of radiative transfer models of starless cores. We find a high-mass starless core candidate with a model-derived mass consistent with $29^{52}_{15}\, M_\odot$ when integrated over size scales of $2\times10^4\, \mathrm{au}$. Unresolved cores are poorly fit by starless core models, supporting the interpretation that they are protostellar even without detection of outflows. Substantial fragmentation is observed towards 10 out of 12 clumps. We extract sources from the maps using a dendrogram to study the characteristic fragmentation length scale. Nearest neighbor separations when corrected for projection are consistent with being equal to the clump average thermal Jeans length. Our findings support a hierarchical fragmentation process, where the highest density regions are not strongly supported against thermal gravitational fragmentation by turbulence or magnetic fields.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.10374 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Mid- and far-infrared 3 0 × 3 0 maps of the clumps in the survey sample, showing GLIMPSE 8 µm, MIPSGAL 24 µm, and Hi-GAL 70 µm and 350 µm. The ALMA Band 6 single pointings target the peak flux positions derived from the BGPS 1.1 mm observations. The inner and outer red circles show the 50% (2700) and 20% (4000) power points of the primary beam for the ALMA 12 m array images. Clumps from Svoboda et al. (2016) were se… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Peak mass surface density Σcl,pk versus total mass Mcl. Values are derived from the BGPS at 1.1 mm (θhpbw = 3300) for clumps with well-constrained distances d < 5 kpc. Starless clump candidates (blue points, contours), protostellar clumps (orange contours), and the ALMA sample (blue stars). Total masses of the sample range between Mcl ≈ 400 − 3000 M and Σcl,pk ∼ 0.1 g cm−2 . The dashed lines show Σcl,pk as a functio… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. ALMA 12 + 7 m array jointly deconvolved 230 GHz line-free continuum images. The clumps show a rich degree of fragmentation with multiple condensations connected by filamentary structures, although sources G30120 and G23605 are largely devoid of detected emission on the scale of the synthesized beam (0.8500 × 0.7500, visualized at lower-left). The images are uncorrected for primary beam attenuation for visual display… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison between the ALMA 230 GHz continuum (black lines) and IRAC 8 µm intensity S8 (color map, inverted) for clump G24051. Good spatial correspondence is observed between the sub-structure in the ALMA continuum and the highest extinction features in the GLIMPSE 8 µ…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Dendrogram extracted dense gas sub-structures (orange contour) over-plotted on the ALMA 12 + 7 m array jointly deconvolved 230 GHz line-free continuum images. Elliptical sources are visualized (red ellipses). Sub-structures are labeled by their catalog number from [PI…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Peak clump mass surface density from the BGPS 1.1 mm data versus the number of leaves (i.e. dendrogram leaves) per clump from the ALMA observations. The data hints at an increasing trend of higher mass surface density clumps associated with a higher degree of fragmenta…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: ALMA joint 12 + 7 m array CO J = 2 → 1 intensity of velocity components integrated between offsets 5 km s−1 to 15 km s−1 (red contours) and between offsets −5 km s−1 to −15 km s−1 (blue contours). Bipolar outflows are observed towards 9/12 clumps. Contours are shown at…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Left: Fraction of the computed models with peak flux densities S1.3mm,pk meeting the source detection criteria > 5σrms in the images as a function of M(r < 2 × 104 au) and sisrf. Lower mass cores meet the criteria for larger values of sisrf. The 50% detection threshold…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Top row: 230 GHz continuum images of example sources G28539 S2, G28539 S4, and G29558 S1. Contours (black solid) show 10, 20, and 50σrms, and the 3. 005 and 4 00 radius apertures (gray dashed) show the region the radial brightness profiles used for the model comparison…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Example ALMA observed sources fit with the suite of starless core models. The observed radial brightness profiles (black) and the image 1σrms (gray region) are shown with the best fit model (red dashed) and envelope of all models that satisfy χ 2 r −χ 2 r,best < 3 (re…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Nearest neighbor separation scaled by the clump thermal Jeans length (δnns/hλj,thi) versus number of leaves. dom sampling of the observational uncertainties in λj,th as described above and sampling the de-projected source separations (see §5.1) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figur…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Left: Probability density functions (PDFs) of the projection-corrected nearest neighbor separations between sources in each clump, scaled by the clump average thermal Jeans length. PDFs are scaled such that the peak probability equals 1. The thermal Jeans length is sh…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Lower left: CDFs of different lengths δ when scaled as multiples of the thermal Jeans length computed with Monte Carlo random sampling. CDFs of the projection-corrected nearest neighbor separations for sources in all clumps (red), similarly for sources of individual c…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Average spectrum and position-velocity diagram for a 6. 000 wide rectangular aperture lying along the outflow axis. Left: Spatially averaged spectrum. The center LSR velocity vlsr = 83.0 km s−1 traced by H2CO 30,3 → 20,2 is shown in both panels (cyan dashed line). Rig…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: ALMA joint 12 + 7 m array SiO J = 5 → 4 intensity of velocity components integrated between offsets 2 km s−1 to 15 km s−1 (red contours) and between offsets −2 km s−1 to −15 km s−1 (blue contours). Bi-polar outflows are observed in 3 out of 12 clumps. Contours are sho…
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Top: ISRF parametrization used to self-consistently calculate the temperature profiles of starless core radiative transfer models. Flux densities are scaled by factors of 1 (black), 101 (grey), and 102 (light grey), excluding the contribution from the CMB. Bottom: CDF…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Parameter profiles for the suite of 104 models computed with RADMC-3D . For each radii bin, the median value (red line), 16 − 84 percentile interval (dark gray region), and 2.5 − 97.5 percentile interval (light gray region) are shown. Top: Input radial gas volume dens…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

128 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 'mid.sentence := #2 '...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  3. [3]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  4. [4]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ""...

  5. [5]

    - [1] #1 = = ^ ^ ^ .\!\!^ d .\!\!^ h .\!\!^ m .\!\!^ s .\!\!^ @mss

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

    2019

  6. [6]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 'mid.sentence := #2 '...

  7. [7]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  8. [8]

    E., Ginsburg , A

    Aguirre , J. E., Ginsburg , A. G., Dunham , M. K., et al. 2011, , 192, 4, 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/4

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/4 2011

Show all 128 references
  1. [9]

    2014, Protostars and Planets VI, 27, 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch002

    Andr \'e , P., Di Francesco , J., Ward-Thompson , D., et al. 2014, Protostars and Planets VI, 27, 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch002

    2014 doi

  2. [10]

    G., Shepherd , D., Gueth , F., et al

    Arce , H. G., Shepherd , D., Gueth , F., et al. 2007, Protostars and Planets V, 245

    2007

  3. [11]

    Barnard , E. E. 1907, , 25, 10.1086/141434

    1907 doi

  4. [12]

    M., et al

    Battersby , C., Bally , J., Jackson , J. M., et al. 2010, , 721, 222, 10.1088/0004-637X/721/1/222

    2010 doi

  5. [13]

    2017, , 835, 263, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/263

    Battersby , C., Bally , J., & Svoboda , B. 2017, , 835, 263, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/263

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    A., Churchwell , E., Babler , B

    Benjamin , R. A., Churchwell , E., Babler , B. L., et al. 2003, , 115, 953, 10.1086/376696

    2003 doi

  7. [15]

    A., & Tafalla , M

    Bergin , E. A., & Tafalla , M. 2007, , 45, 339, 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.071206.100404

    2007

  8. [16]

    B., McKee , C

    Beuther , H., Churchwell , E. B., McKee , C. F., & Tan , J. C. 2007, Protostars and Planets V, 165

    2007

  9. [17]

    E., Johnston , K., et al

    Beuther , H., Ragan , S. E., Johnston , K., et al. 2015 a , , 584, A67, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527108

    2015 doi

  10. [18]

    2015 b , , 581, A119, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526759

    Beuther , H., Henning , T., Linz , H., et al. 2015 b , , 581, A119, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526759

    2015 doi

  11. [19]

    C., Ahmadi , A., et al

    Beuther , H., Mottram , J. C., Ahmadi , A., et al. 2018, ArXiv e-prints. 1805.01191

    2018 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Black , J. H. 1994, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 58, The First Symposium on the Infrared Cirrus and Diffuse Interstellar Clouds, ed. R. M. Cutri & W. B. Latter , 355

    1994

  13. [22]

    Bonnor , W. B. 1956, , 116, 351, 10.1093/mnras/116.3.351

    1956 doi

  14. [23]

    2016, , 819, 139, 10.3847/0004-637X/819/2/139

    Busquet , G., Estalella , R., Palau , A., et al. 2016, , 819, 139, 10.3847/0004-637X/819/2/139

    2016 doi

  15. [24]

    A., Clayton , G

    Cardelli , J. A., Clayton , G. C., & Mathis , J. S. 1989, , 345, 245, 10.1086/167900

    1989 doi

  16. [25]

    2015, , 584, A78, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525780

    Carniani , S., Maiolino , R., De Zotti , G., et al. 2015, , 584, A78, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525780

    2015 doi

  17. [26]

    T., Jackson , J

    Chambers , E. T., Jackson , J. M., Rathborne , J. M., & Simon , R. 2009, , 181, 360, 10.1088/0067-0049/181/2/360

    2009 doi

  18. [27]

    1953, , 118, 116, 10.1086/145732

    Chandrasekhar , S., & Fermi , E. 1953, , 118, 116, 10.1086/145732

    1953 doi

  19. [28]

    L., Meade , M

    Churchwell , E., Babler , B. L., Meade , M. R., et al. 2009, , 121, 213, 10.1086/597811

    2009 doi

  20. [29]

    S., et al

    Contreras , Y., Schuller , F., Urquhart , J. S., et al. 2013, , 549, A45, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220155

    2013 doi

  21. [30]

    S., Schuller , F., et al

    Csengeri , T., Urquhart , J. S., Schuller , F., et al. 2014, , 565, A75, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322434

    2014 doi

  22. [31]

    J., Brogan , C

    Cyganowski , C. J., Brogan , C. L., Hunter , T. R., et al. 2017, , 468, 3694, 10.1093/mnras/stx043

    2017 doi

  23. [32]

    J., Whitney , B

    Cyganowski , C. J., Whitney , B. A., Holden , E., et al. 2008, , 136, 2391, 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2391

    2008 doi

  24. [33]

    Draine , B. T. 1978, , 36, 595, 10.1086/190513

    1978 doi

  25. [34]

    P., Juhasz , A., Pohl , A., et al

    Dullemond , C. P., Juhasz , A., Pohl , A., et al. 2012, RADMC-3D: A multi-purpose radiative transfer tool , Astrophysics Source Code Library. 1202.015

    2012

  26. [35]

    M., Stutz , A

    Dunham , M. M., Stutz , A. M., Allen , L. E., et al. 2014, Protostars and Planets VI, 195, 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch009

    2014 doi

  27. [36]

    J., et al

    Dzib , S., Loinard , L., Mioduszewski , A. J., et al. 2010, , 718, 610, 10.1088/0004-637X/718/2/610

    2010 doi

  28. [37]

    1955, , 37, 217

    Ebert , R. 1955, , 37, 217

    1955

  29. [38]

    J., Moore , T

    Eden , D. J., Moore , T. J. T., Plume , R., et al. 2017, , 469, 2163, 10.1093/mnras/stx874

    2017 doi

  30. [39]

    2017, , 471, 100, 10.1093/mnras/stx1357

    Elia , D., Molinari , S., Schisano , E., et al. 2017, , 471, 100, 10.1093/mnras/stx1357

    2017 doi

  31. [40]

    P., Rosolowsky , E., Glenn , J., et al

    Ellsworth-Bowers , T. P., Rosolowsky , E., Glenn , J., et al. 2015, , 799, 29, 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/29

    2015 doi

  32. [41]

    L., Corder , S., Duch \^e ne , G., et al

    Enoch , M. L., Corder , S., Duch \^e ne , G., et al. 2011, , 195, 21, 10.1088/0067-0049/195/2/21

    2011 doi

  33. [43]

    2016 b , , 828, 100, 10.3847/0004-637X/828/2/100

    ---. 2016 b , , 828, 100, 10.3847/0004-637X/828/2/100

    2016 doi

  34. [44]

    P., Cabrit , S., et al

    Frank , A., Ray , T. P., Cabrit , S., et al. 2014, Protostars and Planets VI, 451, 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch020

    2014 doi

  35. [45]

    K., Bourke , T

    Friesen , R. K., Bourke , T. L., Di Francesco , J., Gutermuth , R., & Myers , P. C. 2016, , 833, 204, 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/204

    2016 doi

  36. [46]

    K., Pineda , J

    Friesen , R. K., Pineda , J. E., co-PIs , et al. 2017, , 843, 63, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6d58

    2017 doi

  37. [47]

    2013, , 208, 14, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/14

    Ginsburg , A., Glenn , J., Rosolowsky , E., et al. 2013, , 208, 14, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/14

    2013 doi

  38. [48]

    2012, , 420, 1457, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20131.x

    Hartmann , L., Ballesteros-Paredes , J., & Heitsch , F. 2012, , 420, 1457, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20131.x

    2012

  39. [49]

    2013, , 769, L27, 10.1088/2041-8205/769/2/L27

    Hatsukade , B., Ohta , K., Seko , A., Yabe , K., & Akiyama , M. 2013, , 769, L27, 10.1088/2041-8205/769/2/L27

    2013 doi

  40. [50]

    2017, ArXiv e-prints

    Hocuk , S., Szucs , L., Caselli , P., et al. 2017, ArXiv e-prints. 1704.02763

    2017 arXiv

  41. [51]

    2009, , 691, 823, 10.1088/0004-637X/691/1/823

    Hosokawa , T., & Omukai , K. 2009, , 691, 823, 10.1088/0004-637X/691/1/823

    2009 doi

  42. [52]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing In Science & Engineering, 9, 90, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  43. [53]

    D., Cyganowski , C

    Ilee , J. D., Cyganowski , C. J., Nazari , P., et al. 2016, , 462, 4386, 10.1093/mnras/stw1912

    2016 doi

  44. [54]

    Inutsuka , S.-I., & Miyama , S. M. 1992, , 388, 392, 10.1086/171162

    1992 doi

  45. [55]

    M., Finn , S

    Jackson , J. M., Finn , S. C., Chambers , E. T., Rathborne , J. M., & Simon , R. 2010, , 719, L185, 10.1088/2041-8205/719/2/L185

    2010 doi

  46. [56]

    C., et al

    Jim \'e nez-Serra , I., Caselli , P., Tan , J. C., et al. 2010, , 406, 187, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16698.x

    2010

  47. [57]

    E., Henning , T., & Stutz , A

    Kainulainen , J., Ragan , S. E., Henning , T., & Stutz , A. 2013, , 557, A120, 10.1051/0004-6361/201321760

    2013 doi

  48. [58]

    M., Stanke , T., et al

    Kainulainen , J., Stutz , A. M., Stanke , T., et al. 2017, , 600, A141, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628481

    2017 doi

  49. [59]

    2010, , 723, L7, 10.1088/2041-8205/723/1/L7

    Kauffmann , J., & Pillai , T. 2010, , 723, L7, 10.1088/2041-8205/723/1/L7

    2010 doi

  50. [60]

    C., Caselli , P., et al

    Kong , S., Tan , J. C., Caselli , P., et al. 2017, , 834, 193, 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/193

    2017 doi

  51. [61]

    2001, , 322, 231, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x

    Kroupa , P. 2001, , 322, 231, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x

    2001

  52. [62]

    Larson , R. B. 1985, , 214, 379, 10.1093/mnras/214.3.379

    1985 doi

  53. [63]

    2005, , 359, 211, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08881.x

    ---. 2005, , 359, 211, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08881.x

    2005

  54. [64]

    2016, , 592, A61, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525792

    Lippok , N., Launhardt , R., Henning , T., et al. 2016, , 592, A61, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525792

    2016 doi

  55. [65]

    2016, , 595, A122, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629077

    Louvet , F., Motte , F., Gusdorf , A., et al. 2016, , 595, A122, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629077

    2016 doi

  56. [66]

    2015, , 805, 171, 10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/171

    Lu , X., Zhang , Q., Wang , K., & Gu , Q. 2015, , 805, 171, 10.1088/0004-637X/805/2/171

    2015 doi

  57. [67]

    A., Peretto , N., et al

    McGuire , C., Fuller , G. A., Peretto , N., et al. 2016, , 594, A118, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527062

    2016 doi

  58. [68]

    F., & Ostriker , E

    McKee , C. F., & Ostriker , E. C. 2007, , 45, 565, 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806.110602

    2007 arXiv

  59. [69]

    F., & Tan , J

    McKee , C. F., & Tan , J. C. 2002, , 416, 59, 10.1038/416059a

    2002 doi

  60. [70]

    2003, , 585, 850, 10.1086/346149

    ---. 2003, , 585, 850, 10.1086/346149

    2003 doi

  61. [71]

    2010, in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, ed

    McKinney, W. 2010, in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, ed. S. van der Walt & J. Millman, 51 -- 56

    2010

  62. [72]

    P., Waters , B., Schiebel , D., Young , W., & Golap , K

    McMullin , J. P., Waters , B., Schiebel , D., Young , W., & Golap , K. 2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 376, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, ed. R. A. Shaw , F. Hill , & D. J. Bell , 127

    2007

  63. [73]

    2010, , 122, 314, 10.1086/651314

    Molinari , S., Swinyard , B., Bally , J., et al. 2010, , 122, 314, 10.1086/651314

    2010 doi

  64. [74]

    2016, , 591, A149, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526380

    Molinari , S., Schisano , E., Elia , D., et al. 2016, , 591, A149, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526380

    2016 doi

  65. [75]

    2017, ArXiv e-prints

    Motte , F., Bontemps , S., & Louvet , F. 2017, ArXiv e-prints. 1706.00118

    2017 arXiv

  66. [76]

    u ller , H. S. P., Schl \

    M \"u ller , H. S. P., Schl \"o der , F., Stutzki , J., & Winnewisser , G. 2005, Journal of Molecular Structure, 742, 215, 10.1016/j.molstruc.2005.01.027

    2005 doi

  67. [77]

    Myers , P. C. 2017, , 838, 10, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5fa8

    2017 doi

  68. [78]

    1987, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 77, 635, 10.1143/PTP.77.635

    Nagasawa , M. 1987, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 77, 635, 10.1143/PTP.77.635

    1987 doi

  69. [79]

    2013, , 775, 88, 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/88

    Nguyen-Lu'o'ng , Q., Motte , F., Carlhoff , P., et al. 2013, , 775, 88, 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/88

    2013 doi

  70. [80]

    Oliphant, T. E. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9

    2007

  71. [81]

    1994, , 291, 943

    Ossenkopf , V., & Henning , T. 1994, , 291, 943

    1994

  72. [82]

    1964, , 140, 1056, 10.1086/148005

    Ostriker , J. 1964, , 140, 1056, 10.1086/148005

    1964 doi

  73. [83]

    2015, , 453, 3785, 10.1093/mnras/stv1834

    Palau , A., Ballesteros-Paredes , J., V \'a zquez-Semadeni , E., et al. 2015, , 453, 3785, 10.1093/mnras/stv1834

    2015 doi

  74. [84]

    A., Roman-Zuniga , C

    Palau , A., Zapata , L. A., Roman-Zuniga , C. G., et al. 2017, ArXiv e-prints. 1706.04623

    2017 arXiv

  75. [85]

    Peretto , N., & Fuller , G. A. 2009, , 505, 405, 10.1051/0004-6361/200912127

    2009 doi

  76. [86]

    P \'e rez, F., & Granger, B. E. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9

    2007

  77. [87]

    S., & Mac Low , M.-M

    Peters , T., Banerjee , R., Klessen , R. S., & Mac Low , M.-M. 2011, , 729, 72, 10.1088/0004-637X/729/1/72

    2011 doi

  78. [88]

    S., et al

    Peters , T., Banerjee , R., Klessen , R. S., et al. 2010 a , , 711, 1017, 10.1088/0004-637X/711/2/1017

    2010 doi

  79. [89]

    S., Mac Low , M.-M., & Banerjee , R

    Peters , T., Klessen , R. S., Mac Low , M.-M., & Banerjee , R. 2010 b , , 725, 134, 10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/134

    2010 doi

  80. [90]

    Plummer , H. C. 1911, , 71, 460, 10.1093/mnras/71.5.460

    1911 doi

  81. [91]

    C., Dunham , M

    Pokhrel , R., Myers , P. C., Dunham , M. M., et al. 2018, , 853, 5, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa240

    2018 doi

  82. [92]

    J., Markwick-Kemper , A., & ALMA Working Group on Spectral Line Frequencies

    Remijan , A. J., Markwick-Kemper , A., & ALMA Working Group on Spectral Line Frequencies . 2007, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 211, 132.11

    2007

  83. [93]

    Robitaille , T. P. 2017, , 600, A11, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425486

    2017 doi

  84. [94]

    P., Whitney , B

    Robitaille , T. P., Whitney , B. A., Indebetouw , R., & Wood , K. 2007, , 169, 328, 10.1086/512039

    2007 doi

  85. [95]

    2016, ArXiv e-prints

    Rosero , V., Hofner , P., Claussen , M., et al. 2016, ArXiv e-prints. 1609.03269

    2016 arXiv

  86. [96]

    K., Ginsburg , A., et al

    Rosolowsky , E., Dunham , M. K., Ginsburg , A., et al. 2010, , 188, 123, 10.1088/0067-0049/188/1/123

    2010 doi

  87. [97]

    W., Pineda , J

    Rosolowsky , E. W., Pineda , J. E., Kauffmann , J., & Goodman , A. A. 2008, , 679, 1338, 10.1086/587685

    2008 doi

  88. [98]

    M., Foster , J

    Sanhueza , P., Jackson , J. M., Foster , J. B., et al. 2013, , 773, 123, 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/123

    2013 doi

  89. [99]

    M., Zhang , Q., et al

    Sanhueza , P., Jackson , J. M., Zhang , Q., et al. 2017, , 841, 97, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6ff8

    2017 doi

  90. [100]

    W., Immer , K., et al

    Sato , M., Wu , Y. W., Immer , K., et al. 2014, , 793, 72, 10.1088/0004-637X/793/2/72

    2014 doi

  91. [101]

    M., Pineau des Forets , G., & Flower , D

    Schilke , P., Walmsley , C. M., Pineau des Forets , G., & Flower , D. R. 1997, , 321, 293

    1997

  92. [102]

    M., Contreras , Y., et al

    Schuller , F., Menten , K. M., Contreras , Y., et al. 2009, , 504, 415, 10.1051/0004-6361/200811568

    2009 doi

  93. [103]

    L., Claussen , M

    Shirley , Y. L., Claussen , M. J., Bourke , T. L., Young , C. H., & Blake , G. A. 2007, , 667, 329, 10.1086/520570

    2007 doi

  94. [104]

    L., Nordhaus , M

    Shirley , Y. L., Nordhaus , M. K., Grcevich , J. M., et al. 2005, , 632, 982, 10.1086/431963

    2005 doi

  95. [105]

    J., Glover , S

    Smith , R. J., Glover , S. C. O., Klessen , R. S., & Fuller , G. A. 2016, , 455, 3640, 10.1093/mnras/stv2559

    2016 doi

  96. [106]

    J., Longmore , S., & Bonnell , I

    Smith , R. J., Longmore , S., & Bonnell , I. 2009, , 400, 1775, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15621.x

    2009

  97. [107]

    E., Shirley , Y

    Svoboda , B. E., Shirley , Y. L., Battersby , C., et al. 2016, , 822, 59, 10.3847/0004-637X/822/2/59

    2016 doi

  98. [108]

    C., Beltr \'a n , M

    Tan , J. C., Beltr \'a n , M. T., Caselli , P., et al. 2014, Protostars and Planets VI, 149, 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch007

    2014 doi

  99. [109]

    C., Kong , S., Butler , M

    Tan , J. C., Kong , S., Butler , M. J., Caselli , P., & Fontani , F. 2013, , 779, 96, 10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/96

    2013 doi

  100. [110]

    C., Kong , S., Zhang , Y., et al

    Tan , J. C., Kong , S., Zhang , Y., et al. 2016, , 821, L3, 10.3847/2041-8205/821/1/L3

    2016 doi

  101. [111]

    S., Takahashi , S., Zapata , L

    Teixeira , P. S., Takahashi , S., Zapata , L. A., & Ho , P. T. P. 2016, , 587, A47, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526807

    2016 doi

  102. [112]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    The Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    2018 doi

  103. [113]

    A., Billot , N., et al

    Traficante , A., Fuller , G. A., Billot , N., et al. 2017, , 470, 3882, 10.1093/mnras/stx1375

    2017 doi

  104. [114]

    A., Peretto , N., Pineda , J

    Traficante , A., Fuller , G. A., Peretto , N., Pineda , J. E., & Molinari , S. 2015, , 451, 3089, 10.1093/mnras/stv1158

    2015 doi

  105. [115]

    2013, , 549, A130, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219570

    Veneziani , M., Elia , D., Noriega-Crespo , A., et al. 2013, , 549, A130, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219570

    2013 doi

  106. [116]

    2012, , 745, L30, 10.1088/2041-8205/745/2/L30

    Wang , K., Zhang , Q., Wu , Y., Li , H.-b., & Zhang , H. 2012, , 745, L30, 10.1088/2041-8205/745/2/L30

    2012 doi

  107. [117]

    2011, , 735, 64, 10.1088/0004-637X/735/1/64

    Wang , K., Zhang , Q., Wu , Y., & Zhang , H. 2011, , 735, 64, 10.1088/0004-637X/735/1/64

    2011 doi

  108. [118]

    2014, , 439, 3275, 10.1093/mnras/stu127

    Wang , K., Zhang , Q., Testi , L., et al. 2014, , 439, 3275, 10.1093/mnras/stu127

    2014 doi

  109. [119]

    2010, , 709, 27, 10.1088/0004-637X/709/1/27

    Wang , P., Li , Z.-Y., Abel , T., & Nakamura , F. 2010, , 709, 27, 10.1088/0004-637X/709/1/27

    2010 doi

  110. [120]

    M., Jackson , J., & Wu , Y

    Wang , Y., Zhang , Q., Rathborne , J. M., Jackson , J., & Wu , Y. 2006, , 651, L125, 10.1086/508939

    2006 doi

  111. [121]

    C., & Draine , B

    Weingartner , J. C., & Draine , B. T. 2001, , 548, 296, 10.1086/318651

    2001 doi

  112. [122]

    P., & Ward-Thompson , D

    Whitworth , A. P., & Ward-Thompson , D. 2001, , 547, 317, 10.1086/318373

    2001 doi

  113. [123]

    2012, , 544, A146, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118107

    Wienen , M., Wyrowski , F., Schuller , F., et al. 2012, , 544, A146, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118107

    2012 doi

  114. [124]

    P., de Geus , E

    Williams , J. P., de Geus , E. J., & Blitz , L. 1994, , 428, 693, 10.1086/174279

    1994 doi

  115. [125]

    H., & Evans , II, N

    Young , C. H., & Evans , II, N. J. 2005, , 627, 293, 10.1086/430436

    2005 doi

  116. [126]

    P., et al

    Yuan , J., Wu , Y., Ellingsen , S. P., et al. 2017, , 231, 11, 10.3847/1538-4365/aa7204

    2017 doi

  117. [127]

    2011, , 733, 26, 10.1088/0004-637X/733/1/26

    Zhang , Q., & Wang , K. 2011, , 733, 26, 10.1088/0004-637X/733/1/26

    2011 doi

  118. [128]

    2015, , 804, 141, 10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/141

    Zhang , Q., Wang , K., Lu , X., & Jim \'e nez-Serra , I. 2015, , 804, 141, 10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/141

    2015 doi

  119. [129]

    2009, , 696, 268, 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/268

    Zhang , Q., Wang , Y., Pillai , T., & Rathborne , J. 2009, , 696, 268, 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/268

    2009 doi

  120. [130]

    C., & Hosokawa , T

    Zhang , Y., Tan , J. C., & Hosokawa , T. 2014, , 788, 166, 10.1088/0004-637X/788/2/166

    2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.