Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 43 references

Twisted Translation Flows and Effective Weak Mixing

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes a power-law bound on twisted ergodic integrals for almost every translation flow in every stratum, and derives from it H\"older estimates on spectral measures and effective weak mixing.

desk verdict A major within-field advance that deserves a serious referee, but the load-bearing coding estimate in Lemma 6.2 (formula (23)) is asserted rather than proved and the author should be made to fill the gap before acceptance. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.11040 v2 pith:GUWZ67ZM submitted 2019-08-29 math.DS

Giovanni Forni This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DS MSC 37A2537E3530F6032G1532G2055N25
keywords twistedcohomologyTeichmüllerflowMasur–VeechmeasuresweakmixingtranslationflowsKontsevich–Zorichcocyclespectraleffectiveergodictheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is an attempt to make the generic weak mixing of translation flows quantitative. For almost every Abelian differential in every stratum of the moduli space of unit-area Abelian differentials, it claims a power-law bound on twisted ergodic integrals: the integral of a zero-average $H^1$ function along the horizontal flow, modulated by $e^{2\pi i\lambda t}$, decays like $T^{1-\alpha'_\kappa}$ with a constant that grows only polynomially in the frequency $\lambda$. From this single estimate the paper derives H\"older estimates on spectral measures, a power-law speed of weak mixing, and deviation bounds for ergodic averages of product flows on $M\times\mathbb{T}$. A sympathetic reader would care because it converts a qualitative theorem about typical parabolic flows into explicit rates with universal exponents, and introduces a new cohomological tool---twisted cohomology over the Teichm\"uller flow---that may apply to other parabolic systems.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the twisted cohomology space $H^1_{h,\lambda}(M,\mathbb{C})$, the cohomology of the differential $d_{h,\lambda}\alpha=d\alpha+2\pi i\lambda\mathrm{Re}(h)\wedge\alpha$; when $\lambda$ is a frequency, its harmonic representatives track the oscillatory component of twisted ergodic integrals. Over the Teichm\"uller flow this defines the twisted cocycle, whose Hodge-norm growth is controlled by the function $\Lambda_\kappa(h,[\eta])$ via a first-variation formula; Lemma 5.4 shows $\Lambda_\kappa<1$ away from the integral cohomology lattice, which is what produces the `spectral gap'. The proof then uses a strengthened linear-elimination argument (Section 6) with a coding of toral Kontsevich--Zorich trajectories to show that the bad set of cohomology classes has Hausdorff dimension $g$ rather than $2g$, and a transfer-cocycle estimate (Lemma 7.2) that turns growth bounds on cohomology into bounds on currents of integration. The final decomposition of arbitrary orbit segments into renormalization-scaled pieces (Lemma 8.2) upgrades the estimates to all times $T$.

What would settle it

Take a concrete stratum such as $H(1,1)$ in genus 2 and compute the Hausdorff dimension of the set of real cohomology classes whose orbit under the toral renormalization cocycle spends asymptotically all its time in any neighborhood of the zero section. The proof requires this dimension to be at most the genus $g$ (so the corresponding real lines form a set of dimension at most $g+1$); if any stratum exhibits a larger dimension, the almost-sure claim of Theorem 1.8 is false. A more direct check: simulate twisted integrals on an explicit genus-2 translation surface for a fixed nonzero frequency $\lambda$ and fit the power-law exponent of $T$; it should match the claimed saving $\alpha'_\kappa$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the obstructions to quantitative weak mixing of translation flows are governed by a twisted cohomology cocycle over the Teichm\"uller flow, and that this cocycle has a `spectral gap' with respect to Masur--Veech measures. Concretely, Theorem 1.8 (restated as Theorem 8.3) asserts that for almost every Abelian differential $h$ in every stratum $H(\kappa)$ there are constants $\alpha'_\kappa,\beta_\kappa,N_\kappa>0$ and $C_\kappa(h)>0$ such that for all $\lambda\neq0$, all zero-average $f\in H^1$, and all $x,T$, the twisted integral satisfies the bound with $T^{1-\alpha'_\kappa}$ and polynomial frequency growth. The paper derives from this bound: H\"older estimates with lower local dimension $2\alpha'_\kappa$ for spectral measures of $H^1$ observables (Corollary 1.9), the effective weak mixing estimate of Corollary 1.11, and the power-law deviation of ergodic averages for the product flow on $M\times\mathbb{T}$ (Theorem 1.5). In the author's framing, these are effective versions, with explicit exponents, of the qualitative weak mixing theorem established earlier by different methods.

Load-bearing premise

The proof hinges on a quantitative coding of how cohomology classes evolve under renormalization: the set of classes whose orbits spend almost all their time near the zero section must be coverable by very few tiny balls, with uniform control of the number and the radii; that estimate in turn assumes the renormalization cocycle has positive expansion rates in unstable directions. If this fails, the exceptional surfaces excluded by the main theorem could form a positive-measure set, and the almost-everywhere conclusion would break.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For almost every Abelian differential in every stratum, every zero-average $H^1$ observable has spectral measure with lower local dimension at least $2\alpha'_\kappa$ at every frequency $\lambda$.
  • The Ces\`aro-averaged correlation functions of typical translation flows decay with a power-law speed $T^{-\alpha'''_\kappa}$, making weak mixing effective rather than merely qualitative.
  • For every nonzero circle speed $\lambda$, ergodic averages along the product flow $M\times\mathbb{T}$ deviate with a power-law saving for observables with enough regularity in the circle direction.
  • For sufficiently smooth observables the twisted ergodic integrals are actually bounded uniformly in frequency, which yields uniform H\"older estimates on spectral measures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The coding estimate that powers the argument is phrased for strata, but nothing in it seems to use the full stratum structure; a similar estimate should yield effective weak mixing for interval exchange transformations with Rauzy--Veech renormalization, which the paper does not address.
  • The uniform frequency bounds for smooth observables suggest that the spectral measure of a typical translation flow may be uniformly H\"older, not merely have positive lower local dimension; this could be tested numerically by estimating spectral measures on explicit genus-2 surfaces.
  • The transfer-cocycle method is not tied to the circle extension; the same twisted-cohomology construction may give quantitative mixing rates for other parabolic extensions of translation flows, such as twists by higher-dimensional torus actions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a twisted cohomology cocycle over the Teichmüller flow on the bundle H^1_κ(M,T), proves a Lyapunov 'spectral gap' via a first variational formula for the Hodge norm, and derives polynomial bounds on twisted ergodic integrals for translation flows (Theorem 1.8, restated as Theorem 8.3). From this it obtains Hölder estimates on spectral measures (Corollary 1.9), effective weak mixing (Corollary 1.11), and deviation of ergodic averages for product translation flows with a circle (Theorem 1.5), for almost every Abelian differential in every stratum H(κ). The proof combines a strengthened linear elimination argument (Section 6), a transfer cocycle estimate for 1-currents (Section 7), and a return-time decomposition (Section 8).

Significance. If the proof is completed, the result is a major advance: it provides the first effective weak-mixing estimates for almost all translation flows in all strata, together with Hölder regularity of spectral measures and product-flow deviation bounds, extending both the qualitative Avila–Forni theorem and the quantitative Athreya–Forni theorem. The twisted cohomology cocycle and the variational formula in Section 5 are original and likely to be influential. The paper is carefully structured, states explicit exponents, and clearly identifies the dependence on external results such as Avila–Forni weak mixing and Kontsevich–Zorich Lyapunov simplicity. The central derivation is not machine-checked, and the main concern is the coding estimate in Lemma 6.2, which is load-bearing for the almost-everywhere statement.

major comments (2)
  1. [Lemma 6.2, formula (23), first estimate] The first estimate in (23) is not justified by the proof. The quantity τ_n is defined as inf_c sup{t : g_t(h,c) ∈ U(r) and g_t(h) ∈ K}, which gives a lower bound on the time spent inside U(r) ∩ π^{-1}(K), but the cocycle can expand at rate e^t during the complementary excursions (the coding letters u' and K'), which occupy total time at most (ε + μ_K)t_n. The proof asserts that each connected component of W^s_{K,U(r),n}(h,ε) ∩ V is contained in a ball of radius C_K r e^{-ν τ_n} without accounting for this expansion. A correct radius estimate must include a factor e^{C(ε+μ_K)t_n} alongside the contraction e^{-ν(1-ε)μ_κ(K)t_n}; as written, the stated rate in (23) is not established. This is load-bearing: Theorem 6.3's Hausdorff-dimension bound, Lemma 6.4's conclusion H-dim RW^s(h) = g+1, and the almost-everywhere assertion of Theorem 8.3 all depend on it. The argument may be repairable by choosing ε, r, and the complement of K sufficiently small, but the proof needs to be supplied.
  2. [Lemma 6.2, second estimate and coding argument] The coding argument for the bound on N_n(r,ε) is presented only in sketch form. The passage from symbolic words to the bound (25) on the number of connected components assumes a uniform bound of the form (r/r_K)^{d_u} e^{d_u|I|} on the number of lattice points in a Hodge ball of radius r e^{|I|}, but the relevant constants (including r_K and the lattice-separation bound along the orbit) are not derived. It is also not made precise how the connected components of W^s_{K,U(r),n}(h,ε) ∩ V correspond to the set C_{w,n}(h) of classes with a fixed code word w. Since the Hausdorff-dimension conclusion in Theorem 6.3 depends quantitatively on both estimates in (23), this part of the proof needs to be completed with explicit controls on all constants.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introduction, Corollary 1.12] Corollary 1.12 is explicitly stated without proof ('we can state (without proof)'); as a stated result in the introduction, it should either be proved in a short appendix or clearly labeled as a remark, since the current label 'corollary' is misleading.
  2. [Lemma 5.4, proof] The line 'by Rellich embedding theorem the embedding Ω^1H^r(M) → Ω^1H^s(M) is compact for any s > r' is a typo; the compact embedding holds for s < r, and the surrounding inequalities should be adjusted accordingly.
  3. [Lemma 8.1 and Theorem 8.3] The symbol α_κ is used with two different meanings: the exponent appearing in Lemma 8.1 and the final exponent α_κ/2 in Theorem 8.3. This is confusing and should be resolved by renaming one of the exponents.
  4. [Theorem 1.5 proof, Section 8] The proof of Theorem 1.5 states that the series converges for s > N_κ − β_κ + 1, whereas Remark 1.7 says the threshold s_κ > 1 is at least as large as N_κ − β_κ; the discrepancy between these two thresholds should be reconciled.
  5. [Lemma 6.2, coding construction] The definition of δ'_K(r) = min{C_K^{-1}|log r|, δ_K(r)} introduces a coding timescale, but the phrase 'and a remainder which we neglect' is not quantified; the error from neglecting the remainder should be controlled explicitly in the final estimates.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the twisted-integral bounds are derived from self-contained cocycle estimates, with published external theorems as inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain is non-circular. The twisted cohomology cocycle (Section 4), the first-variation formula (Section 5), the spectral-gap function Lambda_kappa with Lambda_kappa < 1 away from H^1(M,Z) (Lemma 5.4), and the strengthened linear-elimination coding estimate (Lemma 6.2) are proved in the paper rather than assumed. Theorem 8.3 then derives the twisted-integral bounds by combining Lemma 6.6 with the transfer-cocycle estimate Lemma 7.2 and the standard decomposition Lemma 8.2. The external inputs used are Birkhoff and Oseledets theorems, Masur-Veech ergodicity, Avila-Forni weak mixing [AvF07], Avila-Viana simplicity of the Kontsevich-Zorich Lyapunov spectrum [AV07], and Athreya-Forni effective unique ergodicity [AtF08]; these are published, parameter-free theorems whose assumptions do not include the target exponents alpha'_kappa, beta_kappa, N_kappa. They are therefore legitimate external support rather than disguised assumptions. The paper's self-citations to [F02], [F07], [AtF08], [AvF07] and the acknowledged concurrent work of Bufetov-Solomyak are comparative or input citations, not circular reductions. There are rigor caveats: Lemma 6.2's radius estimate in formula (23) is terse and is the most fragile point, and Corollary 1.12 is explicitly stated 'without proof'; however, an under-proved estimate or an omitted proof is a correctness risk, not circularity. No equation defines the target bound in terms of itself, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 3 invented entities

No numbers are fitted to data. The main constants α, β, N are existential and proved to exist. The proof relies on external background results, listed above, and introduces new mathematical structures that are internally justified rather than empirically motivated.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Simplicity and positivity of Kontsevich-Zorich Lyapunov exponents (Avila-Viana, Filip).
    Used in Section 6 to control dimensions of unstable and stable spaces in the linear elimination argument; if zero exponents existed on the relevant subbundle, the Hausdorff dimension bound could fail.
  • domain assumption Ergodicity and mixing of the lift of the Teichmüller flow to the toral bundle H^1(M,R)/H^1(M,Z) (Forni-Goldman).
    Used in Section 6 to justify Birkhoff generic behavior for the toral cocycle; without this, the almost-everywhere statement could fail.
  • standard math Goldman's dimension formula for cohomology of U(1) local systems (Lemma 4.3).
    Determines the rank of the twisted cohomology bundle as 2g or 2g-2, which enters the dimension counts in the linear elimination argument.
  • standard math Masur-Veech measures are SL(2,R)-invariant and the Teichmüller flow is ergodic with respect to them.
    Background ergodic theory for the renormalization flow; the paper's almost-everywhere statements are formulated with respect to these measures.
  • standard math Birkhoff ergodic theorem and Oseledets theorem.
    Invoked throughout Section 6 to pass from pointwise orbit estimates to almost-everywhere statements.
invented entities (3)
  • Twisted cohomology cocycle over the Teichmüller flow
    purpose: Renormalization of twisted ergodic integrals, giving a spectral gap via Hodge norm growth
    New mathematical object with no external empirical handle; its properties are proved internally in Sections 4 and 5.
  • Transfer cocycle on the bundle of twisted 1-currents
    purpose: Bridges distributional currents and twisted cohomology for the spectral gap lemma in Section 7
    Internal construction used to prove the main estimates.
  • Exception sets W^s_K,U(h,ε) and RW^s(h)
    purpose: Control the set of surfaces and directions for which linear elimination fails
    Internal definitions used to prove that the exceptional set has Hausdorff dimension at most g+1 and Masur-Veech measure zero.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Twisted Translation Flows and Effective Weak Mixing." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GUWZ67ZM

@misc{pith2026190811040,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Twisted Translation Flows and Effective Weak Mixing},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GUWZ67ZM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.11040}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce a twisted cohomology cocycle over the Teichmueller flow and prove a "spectral gap" for its Lyapunov spectrum with respect to the Masur-Veech measures. We then derive Hoelder estimates on spectral measures and bounds on the speed of weak mixing for almost all translation flows in every stratum of Abelian differentials on Riemann surfaces, as well as bounds on the deviation of ergodic averages for product translation flows on the product of a translation surface with a circle.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    [Ad] R. A. Adams, Sobolev Spaces, Pure and Applied Mathematics, v. 65, Academic Press, New York-London, 1975

    work page 1975

  2. [2]

    Athreya and G

    J. Athreya and G. Forni, Deviation of ergodic averages for rational polygonal billiards, Duke Math. J. 144 (2) (2008), 285--319

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Avila and V

    A. Avila and V. Delecroix, Weak mixing directions in non-arithmetic Veech surfaces, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 29 (2016), 1167--1208

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Avila and G

    A. Avila and G. Forni, Weak mixing for interval exchange transformations and translation flows, Ann. of Math. 165(2) (2007), 637--664

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    Avila and M

    A. Avila and M. Leguil, Weak mixing properties of interval exchange transformations and translation flows, Bull. Soc. Math. France 146 (2) (2018), 391--426

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Avila and M

    A. Avila and M. Viana, Simplicity of Lyapunov spectra: proof of the Zorich--Kontsevich conjecture, Acta Math. 198 (1) (2007), 1--56

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    A. I. Bufetov and B. Solomyak, On the modulus of continuity for spectral measures in substitution dynamics, Adv. Math. 260 (2014), 84--129

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    , The H\"older property for the spectrum of translation flows in genus two, Israel J. Math. 223 (1) (2018), 205--259

    work page 2018

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    , On ergodic averages for parabolic product flows, Bull. Soc. Math. France 146 (4) (2018), 675--690

    2018

  2. [10]

    , A spectral cocycle for substitution systems and translation flows, preprint, arXiv:1802.04783

    arXiv

  3. [11]

    , H\"older regularity for the spectrum of translation flows, preprint, arXiv:1908.09347

    1908 arXiv

  4. [12]

    R. V. Chacon, Weakly mixing transformations which are not strongly mixing, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 22 (1969), 559--562

    1969

  5. [13]

    Filip, Zero Lyapunov exponents and monodromy of the Kontsevich--Zorich cocycle, Duke Math

    S. Filip, Zero Lyapunov exponents and monodromy of the Kontsevich--Zorich cocycle, Duke Math. J. 166 (2017) (4), 657--706

    2017

  6. [14]

    Flaminio and G

    L. Flaminio and G. Forni, Equidistribution of nilflows and applications to theta sums, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 26 (2) (2006), 409--433

    2006

  7. [15]

    , On effective equidistribution for higher step nilflows, preprint, arXiv:1407.3640v1

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    Flaminio, G

    L. Flaminio, G. Forni and J. Tanis, Effective equidistribution of twisted horocycle flows and horocycle maps, Geometric and Functional Analysis 26 (5),1359--1448

  9. [17]

    Forni, Solutions of the Cohomological Equation for Area-Preserving Flows on Compact Surfaces of Higher Genus, Ann

    G. Forni, Solutions of the Cohomological Equation for Area-Preserving Flows on Compact Surfaces of Higher Genus, Ann. of Math. 146(2) (1997), 295--344

    1997

  10. [18]

    , Deviation of ergodic averages for area-preserving flows on surfaces of higher genus, Ann. of Math. (2) 155 (2002), no. 1, 1--103

    2002

  11. [19]

    , Sobolev regularity of solutions of the cohomological equation, Erg. Th. Dynam. Sys. , online at https://doi.org/10.1017/etds.2019.108 (arXiv:0707.0940v2)

    2019 arXiv

  12. [20]

    , A geometric criterion for the nonuniform hyperbolicity of the Kontsevich--Zorich cocycle, J. Mod. Dynam. 5 (2) (2011), 355--395

    2011

  13. [21]

    Forni and W

    G. Forni and W. Goldman, Mixing Flows on Moduli Spaces of Flat Bundles over Surfaces, in Geometry and Physics: Volume II , A Festschrift in honour of Nigel Hitchin. Edited by A. Dancer, J. E. Andersen, and O. Garc\'ia-Prada. Oxford University Press, October 2018

    2018

  14. [22]

    Goldman, The symplectic nature of fundamental groups of surfaces, Advances in Mathematics 54 (2) (1984), 200--225

    W. Goldman, The symplectic nature of fundamental groups of surfaces, Advances in Mathematics 54 (2) (1984), 200--225

    1984

  15. [23]

    Goldman and E

    W. Goldman and E. Xia, Rank One Higgs Bundles and Representations of Fundamental Groups of Riemann Surfaces, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, 2008

    2008

  16. [24]

    Green and T

    B. Green and T. Tao, The quantitative behaviour of polynomial orbits on nilmanifolds, Ann. of Math. 175 (2012), 465--540

    2012

  17. [25]

    Gutkin and A

    E. Gutkin and A. B. Katok, Weakly mixing billiards, in Holomorphic dynamics (Mexico, 1986), Lecture Notes in Math. 1345, 163--176 , Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988

    1986

  18. [26]

    A. B. Katok, Interval exchange transformations and some special flows are not mixing, Israel J. Math. 35 (1980), 301--310

    1980

  19. [27]

    A. B. Katok and A. M. Stepin, Approximations in ergodic theory, Uspehi Mat. Nauk 22 (1967), 81--106

    1967

  20. [28]

    Kerckhoff, H

    S. Kerckhoff, H. Masur and J. Smillie, Ergodicity of Billiard Flows and Abelian Differentials, Ann. of Math. 124 (1986), 293--311

    1986

  21. [29]

    Knill, Singular Continuous Spectrum and Quantitative Rate of Mixing, Disc

    O. Knill, Singular Continuous Spectrum and Quantitative Rate of Mixing, Disc. Cont. Dynam. Sys. 4 (1) (1998), 33--42

    1998

  22. [30]

    Kontsevich, Lyapunov exponents and Hodge theory, in The Mathematical Beauty of Physics (Saclay, 1996), Adv

    M. Kontsevich, Lyapunov exponents and Hodge theory, in The Mathematical Beauty of Physics (Saclay, 1996), Adv. Ser. Math. Phys. 24 , 318--332, World Sci. Publ., River Edge, NJ, 1997

    1996

  23. [31]

    Lucien, M\'elange faible topologique des flots sur les surfaces, Ergodic Theory Dynam

    I. Lucien, M\'elange faible topologique des flots sur les surfaces, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 18 (1998), 963--984

    1998

  24. [32]

    Masur, Interval exchange transformations and measured foliations, Ann

    H. Masur, Interval exchange transformations and measured foliations, Ann. of Math. 115 (1982), 168-200

    1982

  25. [33]

    Masur and J

    H. Masur and J. Smillie, Hausdorff dimension of sets of non-ergodic measured foliations, Ann. of Math. 134 , (1991), 455-543

    1991

  26. [34]

    Nelson, Analytic Vectors, Ann

    E. Nelson, Analytic Vectors, Ann. of Math. 70 (1959), 572--615

    1959

  27. [35]

    Nogueira and D

    A. Nogueira and D. Rudolph, Topological weak-mixing of interval exchange maps, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 17 (1997), 1183--1209

    1997

  28. [36]

    Petersen, Ergodic Theory , Cambridge Univ

    K. Petersen, Ergodic Theory , Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1983

    1983

  29. [37]

    Tanis & P

    J. Tanis & P. Vishe, Uniform bounds for period integrals and sparse equidistribution, International Mathematics Research Notices 2015 (24) (2015), 13728--13756 (https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnv115)

    2015 doi

  30. [38]

    W. A. Veech, Gauss measures for transformations on the space of interval exchange maps, Ann. of Math. 115 (1982), 201--242

    1982

  31. [39]

    , The metric theory of interval exchange transformations. I. Generic spectral properties, Amer. J. Math. 106 (1984), 1331--1359

    1984

  32. [40]

    Venkatesh

    A. Venkatesh. Sparse equidistribution problems, period bounds and subconvexity, Ann. of Math. 172 (2010), 989--1094

    2010

  33. [41]

    R. O. Wells, Differential Analysis on Complex Manifolds , Springer-Verlag, New York, 1980

    1980

  34. [42]

    Wright, Cylinder deformations in orbit closures of translation surfaces, Geom

    A. Wright, Cylinder deformations in orbit closures of translation surfaces, Geom. Topol. 19 (1) (2015), 413--438

    2015

  35. [43]

    Zorich, Deviation for interval exchange transformations, Ergodic Theory Dynam

    A. Zorich, Deviation for interval exchange transformations, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 17 (1997), 1477--1499

    1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.