Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 30 references

Monitoring radio galaxies at TeV energies with HAWC

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Using 1017 days of data from the HAWC observatory, the paper finds no statistically significant TeV gamma-ray excess from the radio galaxies M87, NGC 1275, or 3C 264, and reports 95% confidence upper limits and light curves for each.

desk verdict Sparse but honest HAWC conference paper giving the first TeV upper limits and three-year light curves for M87, NGC 1275, and 3C 264; the null detection is robust, while the numeric limits hinge on adopted spectral shapes. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.00075 v1 pith:5LC7XKX2 submitted 2019-08-30 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA

Daniel Avila Rojas , Rubén Alfaro , M. Magdalena González , Nissim Fraija (for the HAWC Collaboration) This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.GA
keywords radiogalaxiesTeVgamma-rayastronomyHAWCObservatoryupperlimitsM87NGC12753C264AGNjets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether a wide-field, high-duty-cycle observatory can catch TeV gamma rays from three radio galaxies — active galaxies whose jets are not aimed at Earth — that pointed telescopes have already detected at very high energies. After 1017 days of data, the search finds no statistically significant excess at the positions of M87, NGC 1275, or 3C 264. The central result is therefore a set of 95% confidence upper limits on each source's TeV flux, together with light curves whose mean fluxes are consistent with zero. This matters because continuous wide-field monitoring can catch flaring states that pointed observations miss, and the limits constrain how misaligned jets produce very-high-energy photons.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on a maximum-likelihood fit that convolves assumed spectral models with the HAWC detector response, using the statistical procedure for upper-limit calculation and the light-curve method developed for HAWC monitoring. The assumed spectra are the load-bearing input: for M87, a power law with $\Gamma=2.31$; for NGC 1275, a power law with an exponential cutoff at 500 GeV and $\Gamma=3$; for 3C 264, a power law with $\Gamma=2.3$. The energy range for each source is chosen where the analysis has 90% sensitivity for that spectral shape and declination, and the quoted limits include attenuation by the extragalactic background light where noted.

What would settle it

Re-run the maximum-likelihood search on the same data using time-dependent spectra measured during known flaring epochs (such as the NGC 1275 flare of late 2016) instead of fixed historical shapes; if the stacked likelihood then yields a significant excess from any of the three sources, the fixed spectral models hid a real signal, while a continuing null would confirm that the reported upper limits hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The claim is a null result: in 1017 days of HAWC observations, no significant TeV gamma-ray excess appears from M87, NGC 1275, or 3C 264. Under the assumed spectra — a power law with index $\Gamma=2.31$ for M87, a power law with an exponential cutoff at 500 GeV and index $\Gamma=3$ for NGC 1275, and a power law with index $\Gamma=2.3$ for 3C 264 — the 95% upper limits are $1.76\times10^{-13}$ (M87 without EBL attenuation), $3.51\times10^{-13}$ (M87 with EBL), $167.8\times10^{-13}$ (NGC 1275 with EBL), and $6.88\times10^{-13}$ (3C 264 with EBL), all in units of $\mathrm{TeV}^{-1}\,\mathrm{cm}^{-2}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}$ over the energy ranges 3–100, 1–4, and 2–40 TeV, respectively. The light curves show no obvious flares, and the M87 limit is consistent with earlier quiescent-state measurements while the NGC 1275 limit is comparable to the reported 2017 flare level.

Load-bearing premise

The limits assume each galaxy's gamma-ray spectrum during the 1017 days had exactly the shape reported by earlier pointed telescopes; if the real spectrum differed, the quoted energy ranges and upper limits would misrepresent the true flux constraints.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The new upper limits set wide-field-monitoring constraints on TeV emission from these three radio galaxies, complementing pointed observations with continuous coverage.
  • For M87, the limit is consistent with quiescent-state observations, so no flare as bright as the historic ones occurred during the 1017-day window.
  • For NGC 1275, the limit is comparable to the 2017 flare flux, so a similar flare within the HAWC field of view would have been detectable.
  • The light curves, with mean fluxes consistent with zero and no obvious flares, provide the basis for the planned Bayesian search for hidden variability.
  • The 3C 264 upper limit supplies an independent cross-check for the pointed detection once those results are published.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to recompute the upper limits under a range of plausible spectral indices and cutoff energies, reporting a band of limits rather than a single number; this would make the model dependence of the constraints explicit.
  • The absence of a detected flare across 1017 days, together with past pointed-telescope flares, suggests the bright TeV states of these radio galaxies occupy a small fraction of their duty cycle; future coordinated wide-field and pointed campaigns could measure that duty cycle directly.
  • The limits can be used to bound the cosmic-ray content of these jets: for fixed jet power and black-hole mass, they constrain how much hadronic emission is allowed, and a coincident neutrino observation would discriminate between leptonic and hadronic models.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a HAWC search for TeV gamma-ray emission from three radio galaxies (M87, NGC 1275, 3C 264) using 1017 days of data. No statistically significant excess is found at any of the three positions, and the authors present 95% confidence-level upper limits on the VHE flux normalization for each source in Table 1, together with light curves over the HAWC observation period. The analysis uses HAWC's standard maximum-likelihood framework with fixed spectral shapes adopted from earlier IACT measurements, and includes EBL attenuation for all but one quoted limit.

Significance. Long-term monitoring of TeV radio galaxies is valuable because these objects are variable and poorly sampled by pointed IACT observations; HAWC's wide field of view and high duty cycle provide complementary constraints. The qualitative claim of no significant excess is robust and consistent with expectations from the known quiescent fluxes of these sources. The quantitative upper limits, however, are only as reliable as the assumed spectral shapes and the missing details in Table 1, so the main scientific value of the paper depends on a few model choices that are not fully justified or documented.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.4, Table 1] The upper limits in Table 1 are not reproducible as presented because the reference energy for each flux normalization and the specific EBL model used are not stated. The same table also omits any systematic uncertainty on the limits. Please add the reference energy (E0) for each spectral model, name the EBL model (e.g., Franceschini et al. 2008 or Domínguez et al. 2011), and state whether the quoted values include systematic uncertainties.
  2. [Section 2.4, NGC 1275 spectral model] The assumed spectrum for NGC 1275, a power law with exponential cutoff at 500 GeV and Γ = 3, is not consistent with the cited MAGIC+Fermi result [19], which reports Γ ≈ 2.05 and a cutoff near 492 GeV for the same flaring period. The 1–4 TeV upper limit is sensitive to the spectral index, so the choice of Γ = 3 must be justified or the published spectral parameters from [19] should be adopted.
  3. [Section 2.4, 3C 264 spectral model] For 3C 264, the adopted Γ = 2.3 is described in the cited review [24] as an 'argued' value, not a measured spectrum from the preliminary VERITAS detection. The resulting upper limit in Table 1 is therefore conditional on an unmeasured spectral shape. Please state this limitation explicitly and, if possible, show how the limit changes for Γ = 2.3 ± 0.5 to quantify the dependence.
  4. [Section 3, comparison with NGC 1275 flare] The statement that the NGC 1275 upper limit is comparable with the flux of the 2017 flare is not quantified. The flare flux quoted in Section 2.2 is about 1.5 Crab, but the upper limit in Table 1 is a differential flux normalization in the 1–4 TeV band. Please provide the corresponding integral flux or state the comparison explicitly, or soften the claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Title/header] The title in the header reads 'HA WC'; this should be corrected to 'HAWC'.
  2. [Section 2.3] The phrase 'most recent galaxy radio to join' should be 'most recent radio galaxy to join'.
  3. [Section 4 (Acknowledgements)] 'Acknowlegments' is misspelled; it should be 'Acknowledgments'.
  4. [Section 2.4 / Figures 1–3] The light-curve figures should include axis labels and a description of the binning (e.g., monthly, weekly) in the captions, and the units of the flux axis should be consistent with the table.
  5. [Section 2.4] The text reports no statistical significance values for the three sources; please include the test-statistic or significance (and the corresponding p-value) for each source, even if the excess is not significant, to support the 'no statistically significant excess' claim.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No circularity: HAWC upper limits are a direct likelihood measurement with externally motivated spectral assumptions.

full rationale

The paper reports an observational search for TeV emission from three radio galaxies using 1017 days of HAWC data. The central result is a null detection and corresponding 95% confidence upper limits, obtained by a maximum-likelihood fit that convolves assumed spectral models with the HAWC detector response. No parameter is fitted to the HAWC data and then relabeled as a prediction; the spectral indices and cutoff energies are adopted from earlier IACT measurements and reviews external to this work. The only self-citations are to HAWC analysis-framework papers for the likelihood procedure and light-curve method, which are methodological rather than load-bearing for the physics conclusion. The dependence of the limits on the assumed spectral shapes is a legitimate caveat about robustness, not a circularity: the assumption comes from outside the paper and is not equivalent to the output. The absence of a statistically significant excess is the direct observable, and the upper limits are standard experimental products. Thus no step reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim (no signal) depends on standard observatory operations and catalog positions. The reported upper limits additionally depend on assumed spectral shapes adopted from prior IACT measurements and on an unspecified EBL model. No new particles or physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • M87 spectral index = 2.31
    Assumed from VERITAS observations [10]; sets the energy dependence of the upper limit.
  • NGC 1275 spectral index = 3
    Assumed for the power-law with exponential cutoff model; chosen in accordance with prior measurements [19].
  • NGC 1275 cutoff energy = 500 GeV
    Assumed exponential cutoff energy for NGC 1275; affects the energy range and limit.
  • 3C 264 spectral index = 2.3
    Assumed from VERITAS preliminary results [23] and literature [24].
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Positions and distances of M87, NGC 1275, and 3C 264 are correctly taken from cited catalogs.
    The search is centered on these coordinates; any error would misplace the analysis.
  • domain assumption The assumed spectral shapes accurately represent the sources' TeV emission during the HAWC observation period.
    Upper limits are computed by convolving these assumed spectra with the HAWC response (Section 2.4).
  • domain assumption The extragalactic background light (EBL) attenuation model used is correct, though the specific model is not stated.
    The table caption says EBL attenuation was considered; the model choice affects the corrected limits.
  • domain assumption The HAWC detector response and the maximum likelihood analysis framework are accurate and unbiased.
    The limits rely on the detector simulation and analysis pipeline described in [25,26].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Monitoring radio galaxies at TeV energies with HAWC." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5LC7XKX2

@misc{pith2026190900075,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Monitoring radio galaxies at TeV energies with HAWC},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5LC7XKX2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.00075}
}
read the original abstract

With an instantaneous field of view of 2 sr and a duty cycle > 95%, the High Altitude Water Cherenkov (HAWC) Gamma-Ray Observatory is a perfect instrument for monitoring variable TeV sources. Because radio galaxies are a type of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) with their jets misaligned with respect to our line of sight, they may help us to probe the physics of very-high-energy (VHE) emission processes in these objects. Three out of four radio galaxies that have been detected at TeV energies by other facilities are located within the field of view of the HAWC Observatory: M87, NGC 1275, and 3C 264. A search for TeV gamma rays at their locations yields no statistically significant excess of counts. We present corresponding upper limits for each radio galaxy and light curves covering 3 years of data taken with HAWC.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.00075 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Light curve for 1017 days of HAWC data for M87 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Light curve for 1017 days of HAWC data for NGC 1275 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Light curve for 1017 days of HAWC data for 3C 264. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [24]

    Rieger and Amir Levinson

    Frank M. Rieger and Amir Levinson. Radio galaxies at vhe energies. Galax- ies, 6(4), 2018. ISSN 2075-4434. doi: 10.3390/galaxies6040116. URL https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4434/6/4/116

    doi:10.3390/galaxies6040116 2018

  2. [1]

    B. L. Fanaroff and J. M. Riley. The morphology of extragalactic radio sources of high and low luminosity. MNRAS, 167:31P–36P, May 1974. doi: 10.1093/mnras/167.1.31P

    doi:10.1093/mnras/167.1.31p 1974

  3. [2]

    N. Fraija. Gamma-ray fluxes from the core emission of Centaurus A: a puzzle solved. MNRAS, 441:1209–1216, June 2014. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu652

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stu652 2014

  4. [3]

    Fraija, A

    N. Fraija, A. Marinelli, A. Galván-Gámez, and E. Aguilar-Ruiz. Modeling the spectral energy distribution of the radio galaxy IC310.Astroparticle Physics, 89:14–22, Mar

    work page

  5. [4]

    Fraija and A

    N. Fraija and A. Marinelli. Neutrino, γ-Ray, and Cosmic-Ray Fluxes from the Core of the Closest Radio Galaxies. ApJ, 830(2):81, Oct 2016. doi: 10.3847/0004- 637X/830/2/81

    doi:10.3847/0004- 2016

  6. [5]

    One-zonesynchrotron self-Compton model for the core emission of Centaurus A revisited

    M.Petropoulou, E.Lefa, S.Dimitrakoudis, andA.Mastichiadis. One-zonesynchrotron self-Compton model for the core emission of Centaurus A revisited. A&A, 562:A12, February 2014. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322833

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322833 2014

  7. [6]

    Akiyama, A

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, K. Akiyama, A. Alberdi, et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole. ApJ, 875:L1, April 2019. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 2019

  8. [7]

    S. Mei, J. P. Blakeslee, P. Côté, et al. The ACS Virgo Cluster Survey. XIII. SBF Distance Catalog and the Three-dimensional Structure of the Virgo Cluster. ApJ, 655:144–162, January 2007. doi: 10.1086/509598

    doi:10.1086/509598 2007

Show all 30 references
  1. [8]

    Beilicke, R

    M. Beilicke, R. Cornils, G. Heinzelmann, et al. Observation of the Giant Radio Galaxy M87 at TeV Energies with H.E.S.S. In22nd Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astro- physics, pages 650–653, Jan 2005

    2005

  2. [9]

    Aleksić, E

    J. Aleksić, E. A. Alvarez, L. A. Antonelli, et al. MAGIC observations of the giant radio galaxy M 87 in a low-emission state between 2005 and 2007. A&A, 544:A96, Aug 2012. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117827

    2005 doi

  3. [10]

    V. A. Acciari, M. Beilicke, G. Blaylock, et al. Observation of Gamma-Ray Emission from the Galaxy M87 above 250 GeV with VERITAS. ApJ, 679:397–403, May 2008. doi: 10.1086/587458

    2008 doi

  4. [11]

    Beilicke and VERITAS Collaboration

    M. Beilicke and VERITAS Collaboration. VERITAS observations of M87 in 2011/2012. In F. A. Aharonian, W. Hofmann, and F. M. Rieger, editors,American Institute of Physics Conference Series , volume 1505 ofAmerican Institute of Physics Conference Series, pages 586–589, December 2...

    2011 doi

  5. [12]

    Aharonian, A

    F. Aharonian, A. G. Akhperjanian, A. R. Bazer-Bachi, et al. Fast Variability of Tera- Electron VoltγRays from the Radio Galaxy M87.Science, 314:1424–1427, December

  6. [13]

    Albert, E

    J. Albert, E. Aliu, H. Anderhub, et al. Very High Energy Gamma-Ray Observations of Strong Flaring Activity in M87 in 2008 February. ApJ, 685:L23, September 2008. doi: 10.1086/592348

    2008 doi

  7. [14]

    V. A. Acciari, E. Aliu, T. Arlen, et al. Veritas 2008-2009 Monitoring of the Vari- able Gamma-ray Source M 87. ApJ, 716:819–824, June 2010. doi: 10.1088/0004- 637X/716/1/819

    2008 doi

  8. [15]

    E. Aliu, T. Arlen, T. Aune, et al. VERITAS Observations of Day-scale Flaring of M 87 in 2010 April. ApJ, 746:141, February 2012. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/141. 6 Monitoring radio Daniel Avila Rojas

    2010 doi

  9. [16]

    M. A. Strauss, J. P. Huchra, M. Davis, et al. A redshift survey of IRAS galaxies. VII - The infrared and redshift data for the 1.936 Jansky sample. ApJS, 83:29–63, November 1992. doi: 10.1086/191730

    1992 doi

  10. [17]

    R. J. Wilman, A. C. Edge, and R. M. Johnstone. The nature of the molecular gas sys- tem in the core of NGC 1275. MNRAS, 359:755–764, May 2005. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- 2966.2005.08956.x

    2005

  11. [18]

    Aleksić et al

    J. Aleksić et al. Detection of very-high energyγ-ray emission from <ASTROBJ>NGC 1275</ASTROBJ> by the MAGIC telescopes. A&A, 539:L2, March 2012. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118668

    2012 doi

  12. [20]

    M. F. Struble and H. J. Rood. A Compilation of Redshifts and Velocity Dispersions for ACO Clusters. ApJS, 125:35–71, November 1999. doi: 10.1086/313274

    1999 doi

  13. [21]

    H. R. de Ruiter, P. Parma, R. Fanti, and C. Fanti. Far-UV to mid-IR proper- ties of nearby radio galaxies. A&A, 581:A33, September 2015. doi: 10.1051/0004- 6361/201424079

    2015 doi

  14. [22]

    E. T. Meyer, M. Georganopoulos, W. B. Sparks, et al. A kiloparsec-scale internal shock collision in the jet of a nearby radio galaxy. Nature, 521:495–497, May 2015. doi: 10.1038/nature14481

    2015 doi

  15. [23]

    Mukherjee

    R. Mukherjee. VERITAS discovery of VHE emission from the FRI radio galaxy 3C

  16. [25]

    A. U. Abeysekara, A. Albert, R. Alfaro, et al. Observation of the Crab Nebula with the HAWC Gamma-Ray Observatory. ApJ, 843:39, July 2017. doi: 10.3847/1538- 4357/aa7555

    2017 doi

  17. [26]

    Younk, Robert J

    Patrick W. Younk, Robert J. Lauer, Giacomo Vianello, et al. A high-level analysis framework for HAWC.arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:1508.07479, Aug 2015

    2015 arXiv

  18. [27]

    A. U. Abeysekara, A. Albert, R. Alfaro, et al. Daily Monitoring of TeV Gamma-Ray Emission from Mrk 421, Mrk 501, and the Crab Nebula with HAWC. ApJ, 841:100, June 2017. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa729e

    2017 doi

  19. [28]

    J. A. García-González, N. Fraija, and M.M. González for the HAWC Collaboration. Gamma-ray light curves for the BL Lac Mrk 421 using HAWC data derived with a new approach. 7

  20. [264]

    The Astronomer’s Telegram, 11436, March 2018

    2018

  21. [2006]

    doi: 10.1126/science.1134408

    doi

  22. [2017]

    5 Monitoring radio Daniel Avila Rojas

    doi: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2017.01.001. 5 Monitoring radio Daniel Avila Rojas

    2017 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.