Fluorescence of rubidium vapor in a transient interaction regime

Aleksandr Khanbekyan; Aram Papoyan; Artur Aleksanyan; Emil Gazazyan; Hrayr Azizbekyan; Marina Movsisyan; Svetlana Shmavonyan

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 18 references

Fluorescence of rubidium vapor in a transient interaction regime

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Fast laser frequency scanning pushes rubidium fluorescence into a transient regime.

desk verdict A clean systematic transient-fluorescence dataset, with a plausible but unproven relaxation-rate extraction because of the homogeneous-Doppler approximation. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.00212 v1 pith:CZNGFJOX submitted 2019-08-31 physics.atom-ph physics.optics

Artur Aleksanyan , Svetlana Shmavonyan , Emil Gazazyan , Aleksandr Khanbekyan , Hrayr Azizbekyan , Marina Movsisyan , Aram Papoyan This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.atom-phphysics.optics

keywords atomicspectroscopyfluorescencetransientinteractionregimeopticalpumpingrubidiumD2linedensitymatrixmodellaserfrequencyscanningground-staterelaxationrate

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies what happens to rubidium D2 fluorescence when the laser frequency is scanned across the hyperfine manifold faster than atoms can reach steady state. It claims that once the scan rate passes about 2 MHz/µs ($10^{6}$ MHz/s), the peak heights of individual hyperfine transitions change, and they change differently on the rising and falling halves of a triangular scan, signaling a transient interaction regime. A six-level density-matrix model that adds Doppler broadening as a homogeneous decay reproduces the measured spectra over four orders of magnitude in scan rate and three laser powers. Fitting that model yields the ground-state relaxation rate of the vapor cell, about $1.03\times 10^{-3}$ of the natural decay rate, which the authors interpret through wall collisions and residual buffer gas. The result matters because it turns a simple fluorescence measurement into a tool for characterizing cells and for timing population control with frequency-modulated continuous-wave lasers.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a time-dependent $6\times 6$ density-matrix model of the rubidium D2 hyperfine levels, solved numerically with the Liouville–von Neumann equation and a relaxation matrix that includes natural decay, ground-state relaxation $\gamma_0$, and a total broadening rate $\gamma_{\mathrm{tot}} \approx \gamma_{\mathrm{Dop}}$ that lumps Doppler broadening into one homogeneous decay. The laser frequency is driven by triangular modulation, $\Delta_{i,j}(t) = \Delta^0_{i,j} + (\Delta/\pi)\arcsin(\cos 2\pi f_s t)$, so each hyperfine transition is crossed in sequence on the rising and falling wings, and the fluorescence signal is computed as $\Phi_t(t) = \sum_{i=3,4,5,6} \Gamma_{i,j}\rho_{i,i}(t)$. The model turns the measured spectra into a fitting problem with two free parameters, the laser field amplitude and $\gamma_0$, and it is the $\gamma_0$ fit that carries the physical interpretation in terms of wall collisions and residual buffer gas.

What would settle it

Measure the same fluorescence spectra in a cell whose residual buffer-gas pressure is independently known, for example by saturated absorption or by filling with a controlled N2 pressure, and check whether the diffusion coefficient $D \approx 1070$ cm²/s and inferred pressure of about 0.11 Torr reproduce the fitted $\gamma_0$; if the homogeneous-Doppler approximation is wrong, the fitted $\gamma_0$ would shift with scan rate and beam diameter in a way the model cannot capture.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that scanning rate is a genuine control parameter: increasing the triangular scan speed above a threshold of about 2 MHz/µs progressively modifies the amplitudes of the D2 hyperfine fluorescence components, with a marked asymmetry between rising and falling frequency scans, while the slow-scan limit is direction-independent and steady-state. The mechanism is a memory effect: at high scan rates the population redistribution and coherences built up on one hyperfine transition survive until the laser reaches the next resonance, so the response depends on scan direction and speed. The maximum rising/falling asymmetry occurs at roughly 20–60 MHz/µs, and symmetry begins to recover at the highest rates, as expected when the interaction time is too short to redistribute population. The paper further claims that its density-matrix model, with Doppler broadening represented by a single homogeneous decay rate added to all coherences, reproduces the spectra well enough to extract the ground-state relaxation rate $\gamma_0 = 1.03(\pm 0.1)\times 10^{-3}\gamma_{\mathrm{nat}} \approx 2\pi\times 6.25$ kHz.

Load-bearing premise

The modeling assumes that all velocity classes of atoms can be treated as one homogeneous Doppler-broadened decay rate $\gamma_{\mathrm{tot}}$ added to every coherence, instead of summing over atoms whose detunings change at different times during the fast scan.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The scan rate above about 2 MHz/µs provides a knob for continuously moving a room-temperature alkali vapor between steady-state and transient interaction, with no pulsed laser required.
The fitted ground-state relaxation rate $\gamma_0 \approx 2\pi\times 6.25$ kHz quantifies how quickly optically pumped atoms in the cell return to isotropic equilibrium, and supports the estimate of about 0.11 Torr residual N2 buffer gas in the cell.
Fluorescence peak heights, particularly for open (non-cycling) hyperfine transitions, become enhanced at high scan rates, so fast scanning can recover transitions that are suppressed by optical pumping in steady state.
The formulas connecting $\gamma_0$ to the diffusion coefficient and the Rb–N2 collision cross-section give a route to measuring velocity-changing collision parameters from a simple fluorescence experiment.
The observed maximum rising/falling asymmetry at 20–60 MHz/µs defines a useful operating window for heralded population control by frequency-modulated continuous-wave radiation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Because the model lumps Doppler broadening into a single decay rate, the fitted $\gamma_0$ may carry a systematic offset; a velocity-averaged treatment that lets each velocity class cross resonance at its own time would test how much of the claimed accuracy depends on that simplification.
The memory effect between neighboring hyperfine transitions suggests that fast triangular scanning could act as a programmable sequence of effective pulses whose shape, duration, and delay are set by the modulation waveform, a path toward coherent population control in Doppler-broadened media without separate pulsed lasers.
The same measurement scheme should transfer to other alkali D lines and to buffer-gas-filled or coated cells, where the extracted $\gamma_0$ would report on different relaxation channels; a natural test is to vary the laser beam diameter and see whether $\gamma_0$ follows the wall-flight prediction.
If the symmetry recovery at the highest scan rates is confirmed, the full curve of fluorescence amplitude versus scan rate supplies a direct readout of the interaction-time scale of the atomic system, potentially useful for characterizing miniaturized vapor cells.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: the experimental core is the real contribution. They scan a cw diode laser across the Rb D2 manifold at rates from ~0.02 to ~220 MHz/µs and record fluorescence on rising and falling slopes. The scan-rate-dependent asymmetry and the partial recovery at the highest rates are clearly visible in the spectra and don't depend on the model. That is a genuinely new dataset and a useful observable for transient interaction in warm vapor.

The theory is a reasonable first attempt: a 6-level density matrix with time-dependent detunings and a relaxation matrix. It reproduces the main trends, and fitting all spectra with one gamma_0 = 1.03e-3 gamma_nat is a sensible approach. The extracted value is order-of-magnitude consistent with wall-induced relaxation plus a small amount of residual buffer gas.

The soft spots are where the stress-test lands. First, Eq. (7) collapses Doppler broadening into a single homogeneous dephasing rate gamma_tot ≈ gamma_Dop added to every coherence. That can reproduce the steady-state Doppler profile, but it is not dynamically equivalent to a velocity average. In the transient regime each velocity class crosses resonance at a different time; the 'memory effect' they exploit is velocity-selective. A single dephasing rate cannot represent that, and since gamma_0 is the only ground-state relaxation parameter, any systematic error in the line-shape model will be absorbed into the fitted gamma_0. The claimed agreement in Figs. 4–5 needs a velocity-averaged simulation, or at least a justification for why the homogeneous treatment is adequate, before I'd trust the number.

Second, the independent cross-section agreement is weaker than it looks. They derive D from the fitted gamma_0, then compute p from D0/D, then sigma from p and D. But p D = D0 p0 (T/T0)^{3/2}, so sigma is actually independent of D and hence of gamma_0. The agreement with the literature value for Rb–N2 collisions therefore validates nothing about the fit; it only reflects the assumed D0. That should be stated or the logic reworked.

Also, there are no error bars on the spectral comparisons or peak-intensity traces, and no raw data. For a quantitative extraction, that's a real gap.

Bottom line: the experiment deserves a serious referee. The paper should be revised to address the velocity-averaging question, include error bars/raw data, and correct the cross-section logic. Who is it for? People working on transient effects in alkali vapor, optical pumping, and vapor-cell metrology. I would not cite the gamma_0 value without the velocity-averaged confirmation, but I'd point to the dataset.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports experimental and theoretical studies of fluorescence spectra of a room-temperature rubidium vapor in the D2 line region under triangular frequency scanning of a cw diode laser. The scan rate is varied by four orders of magnitude (from 0.022 to 222 MHz/µs). The authors observe that increasing the scan rate beyond about 1 MHz/µs modifies the magnitudes of individual hyperfine fluorescence peaks differently on the rising and falling slopes, which they interpret as a transition from steady-state to transient interaction. A time-dependent density-matrix model with two fitted parameters (effective field amplitude E_0 and ground-state relaxation rate γ_0) is used to reproduce the spectra. The best fit yields γ_0 = 1.03×10^-3 γ_nat, from which the authors derive a diffusion coefficient D≈1070 cm^2/s and a collision cross-section σ≈4.06×10^-15 cm^2 for a presumed residual N2 buffer gas. The paper also discusses potential applications for heralded population control.

Significance. The experimental observation of scan-rate- and direction-dependent fluorescence asymmetry is robust, clearly visible in Fig. 3, and appears to be independent of the theoretical model. The dataset spanning 13 scan rates and 3 laser powers is a useful contribution to the study of transient laser-atom interactions in alkali vapor. If the model is corrected and the parameter extraction is put on a quantitative footing, the method could provide a simple way to measure ground-state relaxation rates and diffusion parameters. However, the current quantitative claims are weakened by the questionable treatment of the time-dependent Hamiltonian phase and by the homogeneous approximation for Doppler broadening, so the extracted parameters should be regarded as preliminary.

major comments (4)

[Section 2, Eq. (5)] The Hamiltonian in Eq. (5) uses phase factors exp(-i Δ_{ij}(t) t). For a time-dependent detuning, the correct rotating-frame phase is exp(-i ∫_0^t Δ_{ij}(t') dt'), and the expression Δ(t) t is only valid for constant detuning. Under triangular frequency scanning, Δ(t) changes appreciably on the timescale of the transient response, and for a linear chirp the error in the accumulated phase can be as large as a factor of two. This will modify the predicted population dynamics and therefore the fitted value of γ_0. The simulations should be redone with the integrated phase and the fit re-evaluated.
[Section 2, Eq. (7) and Section 3, fitting] The relaxation matrix treats Doppler broadening as a single homogeneous dephasing rate γ_tot ≈ γ_Dop added to every coherence. In the transient regime, different velocity classes have detunings Δ(t) - k·v and therefore come into resonance at different times, leading to velocity-selective optical pumping. A single dephasing rate cannot capture this dynamics. Since γ_0 is the only ground-state relaxation parameter fitted to the whole dataset, a systematic error in the line-shape model will be absorbed into γ_0, and the subsequent extraction of D and σ is not independently validated. Please test the sensitivity of γ_0 to this approximation, for example by solving the density-matrix equations for a grid of velocity classes and averaging the fluorescence over the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, and refitting γ_0 in that framework.
[Section 3, Figures 4 and 5, and fitting] The agreement between theory and experiment is presented only visually, with no quantitative metric such as a χ² value, residuals, or confidence intervals on the spectral traces. The fitting procedure for γ_0 is not described: no information is given on the parameter range scanned, the minimization strategy, or how the stated uncertainty ±0.1×10^-3 was obtained. To support the central quantitative claim, the authors should provide a reproducible fitting procedure and statistical measures of fit quality.
[Section 3, experimental setup and Figure 3] The photodetector response time τ_det ≈ 5 µs is not accounted for in the model-experiment comparison. At the highest scan rates (e.g., S/2π = 222 MHz/µs), the laser sweeps across a Doppler-broadened feature (~500 MHz) in about 2.3 µs, so the detector response can significantly distort the measured transient spectra and bias the fitted γ_0. The authors should either deconvolve the detector response, include it in the model, or restrict the quantitative analysis to scan rates where the detector is not a limiting factor.

minor comments (5)

[Section 2, first paragraph] The phrase '6×6 dimentional' should be '6×6 dimensional'.
[Section 3, text near Fig. 3] The symbols ω− and ω+ are used without explicit definition; please define them as the laser frequency on the falling and rising wings, respectively.
[Figure 3 caption] The explanation of τ± is ambiguous; please clarify which half of each panel corresponds to rising and falling frequency and how τ± is measured.
[Section 3, experimental details] Please state whether the recorded spectra are single-shot or averaged, and if averaged, over how many modulation cycles.
[Section 4, diffusion and cross-section derivation] The assumption that the residual buffer gas is N2 is not directly tested; the saturated-absorption measurement only sets an upper bound of ~0.5 Torr. This assumption should be clearly stated as such, since the derived pressure and cross-section depend on it.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the transient asymmetry is an independent experimental result, and gamma0 is explicitly fitted rather than relabeled as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central experimental finding—scan-rate- and scan-direction-dependent modification of Rb D2 fluorescence—is an observed effect that does not depend on the theoretical model. The model is used in forward mode: given known spectroscopic constants, two free parameters (E0 per laser power and a global ground-state relaxation rate gamma0) are used to integrate the Liouville–von Neumann equation, and the resulting spectra are compared with the data. The paper explicitly discloses this fitting procedure: 'Throughout the modeling, we have used known spectroscopic parameters for Rb D2 line system, except for two quantities which were free fitting parameters, namely, i) the effective amplitude of the laser electric field E0 ... and ii) the relaxation rate of the lower energy levels to the equilibrium isotropic state gamma0.' The subsequent estimates of the diffusion coefficient D and collision cross-section sigma are derived from the fitted gamma0 through Eqs. (10)-(12), with additional assumptions about cell geometry and residual buffer gas; these are derived quantities, not predictions of the same data by construction, and the comparison with the literature value of Croucher and Clark is an external consistency check. The only same-author citation, [18], supports a saturated-absorption control measurement and is not load-bearing for the main claim. The homogeneous treatment of Doppler broadening (gamma_tot ≈ gamma_Dop) is a modeling approximation that could affect the fitted value of gamma0, but that is a correctness or robustness concern, not a circularity: no equation in the paper reduces to its own input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as an independent prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result rests on the density-matrix model with a fitted effective field amplitude E0 and a fitted ground-state relaxation rate γ0; the model also assumes Doppler broadening can be collapsed into one homogeneous decay rate. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)

E0 (effective laser field amplitude) = Not reported; fitted per laser power (1, 5, 20 mW)
Entered through the Rabi frequency; fitted because the intensity distribution across the beam and laser linewidth are uncertain, as stated in Section 4.
gamma_0 (ground-state relaxation rate) = 1.03(±0.1) x 10^-3 gamma_nat ≈ 2π x 6.25 kHz
Fitted globally to all spectra across scan rates and powers; the paper presents this as the determined parameter for the vapor cell, Section 4.

assumptions (6)

standard math Liouville-von Neumann equation iħ∂ρ/∂t = [H,ρ] - R(ρ) governs the atomic evolution
Standard density-matrix framework from Blum [8], invoked in Eq. (4).
standard math Triangular frequency modulation Δi,j(t) = Δ0i,j + (Δ/π)arcsin(cos 2πfs t) gives linear up/down scans
Used for time-dependent detunings in the Hamiltonian, Eq. (6); exact representation of a triangular waveform.
domain assumption Doppler broadening is represented as a homogeneous total broadening rate γtot≈γDop acting on all coherences
Section 2, relaxation matrix Eq. (7); ignores velocity-class-resolved detunings, which is a coarse approximation in the fast-scan regime.
domain assumption Initial ground-state populations follow degeneracy weights (5/12, 7/12 for 85Rb; 3/8, 5/8 for 87Rb)
Assumes thermalized equal population among magnetic sublevels, from Steck data [9,10]; used as initial condition for Eq. (4).
domain assumption The relaxation matrix in Eq. (7) captures all relevant decay channels with natural rates Γi,j, ground relaxation γ0, and total broadening γtot
Modeling choice; neglects velocity-changing collisions other than through γ0 and uses natural decay for fluorescence.
domain assumption Fluorescence is proportional to excited-state populations with natural decay rates, Φt = Σ Γi,j ρi,i
Eq. (8); assumes no radiation trapping or reabsorption effects in the detected signal.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fluorescence of rubidium vapor in a transient interaction regime." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CZNGFJOX

@misc{pith2026190900212,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fluorescence of rubidium vapor in a transient interaction regime},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CZNGFJOX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.00212}
}

abstract

We have studied modification of the fluorescence spectra of a room-temperature atomic rubidium vapor in the region of $^{85}$Rb and $^{87}$Rb D$_2$ line while changing the temporal rate of linear (triangular) scanning of laser radiation frequency. Increase of the ramping speed over certain value ($\approx$ 10$^6$ MHz/s) results in essential modification of magnitudes of individual atomic transitions, different on rising and falling slopes, which characterize transition from a steady-state interaction regime to a transient one. Our experimental results are well consistent with the developed theoretical model. The obtained results can be used for determination of atomic system parameters such as ground-state relaxation rate. Possible follow-up actions on addressed control of atomic levels population is discussed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.00212 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** a) Hyperfine structure of rubidium D2 line and individual optical transitions for 85Rb [9] and 87Rb [10] with indicated relative strengths. b) Scheme of the theoretical model with notations of the parameters. 2 Theoretical model We employ a density matrix model [8] to simulate the resonant fluorescence on the hyperfine transitions 85Rb Fg=2,3 → Fe=1,2,3,4 and 87Rb Fg=1,2 → Fe=0,1,2,3 of atomic D2 line (see Fig.1a), … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Schematic drawing of the experimental setup. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Fluorescence spectra recorded at 13 values of scanning rate for 3 values of laser power: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Comparison of theoretical (red lines) and experimental (black lines) fluorescence spectra for 3 values of the laser radiation power and 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Dependence of the fluorescence peak intensity on the laser frequency scanning rate for the four hyperfine transition groups of Rb D [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

[1]

Alexandrov, M

E.B. Alexandrov, M. Auzinsh, D. Budker, D.F. Kimball, S.M. Rochester, V.V. Yashchuk, ”Dynamic eﬀects in nonlinear magneto- optics of atoms and molecules: review”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 22 (2005), 7–20

work page 2005
[2]

Thornton, G.T

D.E. Thornton, G.T. Phillips, G.P. Perram, ”Velocity changing collisions in the laser saturation spectra of 87Rb D2 F ′′ =2”, Opt. Comm. 284 (2011), 2890–2894

work page 2011
[3]

Becerra, R.T

F.E. Becerra, R.T. Willis, S.L. Rolston, H.J. Carmichael, L.A. Orozco, ”Nondegenerate four-wave mixing in rubidium vapor: Transient regime”, Phys. Rev. A 82 (2010), 043833. 7

work page 2010
[4]

Khripunov, D.A

S.A. Khripunov, D.A. Radnatarov, S.M. Kobtsev, V.I. Yudin, A.V. Taichenachev, M.Yu. Basalaev, M.V. Balabas, V.A. Andryushkov, I.D. Popkov, ”Transient processes under dynamic excitation of a coherent population trapping resonance”, Quant. Electron. 46 (2016), 668–671

work page 2016
[5]

Yudin, A.V

V.I. Yudin, A.V. Taichenachev, M.Yu. Basalaev, D.V. Kovalenko, ”Dynamic regime of coherent population trapping and optimiza- tion of frequency modulation parameters in atomic clocks”, Opt. Express 25 (2017), 2742–2751

work page 2017
[6]

Noh, ”Analytical solutions of temporal evolution of populations in optically-pumped atoms with circularly polarized light”, Symmetry 8 (2016), 17

H.-R. Noh, ”Analytical solutions of temporal evolution of populations in optically-pumped atoms with circularly polarized light”, Symmetry 8 (2016), 17

work page 2016
[7]

Gruji´ c, M

Z.D. Gruji´ c, M. Mijailovi´ c, D. Arsenovi´ c, A. Kovaˇ cevi´ c, M. Nikoli´ c, B.M. Jelenkovi´ c, ”Dark Raman resonances due to Ramsey interference in vacuum vapor cells”, Phys. Rev. A 78 (2008), 063816

work page 2008
[8]

Blum, Density Matrix Theory and Applications , Springer Series on Atomic, Optical, and Plasma Physics, 2012 [Online]

K. Blum, Density Matrix Theory and Applications , Springer Series on Atomic, Optical, and Plasma Physics, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.springer.com/la/book/9783642205606

arXiv 2012

Show all 18 references

[9]

Steck, ”Rubidium 85 D line data”, 01 2015 [Online]

D.A. Steck, ”Rubidium 85 D line data”, 01 2015 [Online]. Available: https://steck.us/alkalidata

2015
[10]

Steck, ”Rubidium 87 D line data”, 01 2015 [Online]

D.A. Steck, ”Rubidium 87 D line data”, 01 2015 [Online]. Available: https://steck.us/alkalidata

2015
[11]

Gibbs, R.J

H.M. Gibbs, R.J. Hull, ”Spin-exchange cross sections for Rb 87-Rb87 and Rb87-Cs133 collisions”, Phys. Rev. 153 (1967), 132

1967
[12]

Gharavipour, C

M. Gharavipour, C. Aﬀolderbach, F. Gruet, I.S. Radojiˇ ci´ c, A.J. Krmpot, B.M. Jelenkovi´ c, G. Mileti, ”Optically-detected spin-echo method for relaxation times measurements in a Rb atomic vapor”, New J. Phys. 19 (2017), 063027

2017
[13]

Franzen, ”Spin relaxation of optically aligned rubidium vapor”, Phys

W. Franzen, ”Spin relaxation of optically aligned rubidium vapor”, Phys. Rev. 115 (1959), 850

1959
[14]

Croucher, J.L

D.J. Croucher, J.L. Clark, ”Total collision cross sections and van der Waals constants for alkali atom interactions with atoms and non-reactive diatomic molecules at thermal energies”, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 2 (1968), 603–623

1968
[15]

Corney, Atomic and Laser Spectroscopy , Oxford University Press, ISBN: 9780199211456 (2006), 782p

A. Corney, Atomic and Laser Spectroscopy , Oxford University Press, ISBN: 9780199211456 (2006), 782p

2006
[16]

Rosenberry, J.P

M.A. Rosenberry, J.P. Reyes, D. Tupa, T.J. Gay, ”Radiation trapping in rubidium optical pumping at low buﬀer-gas pressures”, Phys. Rev. A 75 (2007), 023401

2007
[17]

Mat´ uˇ ska, ”An eﬃcient and accurate method to calculate diﬀusion coeﬃcient of structured particles

J. Mat´ uˇ ska, ”An eﬃcient and accurate method to calculate diﬀusion coeﬃcient of structured particles. A ﬁrst case study of Pb diﬀusion in rare gases”, Acta Chim. Slov. 9 (2016), 158–162

2016
[18]

Hakhumyan, A

G. Hakhumyan, A. Sargsyan, C. Leroy, Y. Pashayan-Leroy, A. Papoyan, D. Sarkisyan, ”Essential features of optical processes in neon-buﬀered submicron-thin Rb vapor cell”, Opt. Express 18 (2010), 14577–14585. 8

2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Alexandrov, M

E.B. Alexandrov, M. Auzinsh, D. Budker, D.F. Kimball, S.M. Rochester, V.V. Yashchuk, ”Dynamic eﬀects in nonlinear magneto- optics of atoms and molecules: review”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 22 (2005), 7–20

work page 2005

[2] [2]

Thornton, G.T

D.E. Thornton, G.T. Phillips, G.P. Perram, ”Velocity changing collisions in the laser saturation spectra of 87Rb D2 F ′′ =2”, Opt. Comm. 284 (2011), 2890–2894

work page 2011

[3] [3]

Becerra, R.T

F.E. Becerra, R.T. Willis, S.L. Rolston, H.J. Carmichael, L.A. Orozco, ”Nondegenerate four-wave mixing in rubidium vapor: Transient regime”, Phys. Rev. A 82 (2010), 043833. 7

work page 2010

[4] [4]

Khripunov, D.A

S.A. Khripunov, D.A. Radnatarov, S.M. Kobtsev, V.I. Yudin, A.V. Taichenachev, M.Yu. Basalaev, M.V. Balabas, V.A. Andryushkov, I.D. Popkov, ”Transient processes under dynamic excitation of a coherent population trapping resonance”, Quant. Electron. 46 (2016), 668–671

work page 2016

[5] [5]

Yudin, A.V

V.I. Yudin, A.V. Taichenachev, M.Yu. Basalaev, D.V. Kovalenko, ”Dynamic regime of coherent population trapping and optimiza- tion of frequency modulation parameters in atomic clocks”, Opt. Express 25 (2017), 2742–2751

work page 2017

[6] [6]

Noh, ”Analytical solutions of temporal evolution of populations in optically-pumped atoms with circularly polarized light”, Symmetry 8 (2016), 17

H.-R. Noh, ”Analytical solutions of temporal evolution of populations in optically-pumped atoms with circularly polarized light”, Symmetry 8 (2016), 17

work page 2016

[7] [7]

Gruji´ c, M

Z.D. Gruji´ c, M. Mijailovi´ c, D. Arsenovi´ c, A. Kovaˇ cevi´ c, M. Nikoli´ c, B.M. Jelenkovi´ c, ”Dark Raman resonances due to Ramsey interference in vacuum vapor cells”, Phys. Rev. A 78 (2008), 063816

work page 2008

[8] [8]

Blum, Density Matrix Theory and Applications , Springer Series on Atomic, Optical, and Plasma Physics, 2012 [Online]

K. Blum, Density Matrix Theory and Applications , Springer Series on Atomic, Optical, and Plasma Physics, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.springer.com/la/book/9783642205606

arXiv 2012