Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 49 references

Stable mixing estimates in the infinite P\'eclet number limit

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves that every strictly monotone shear flow with controlled curvature mixes passive scalars at the same sharp t^{-1} rate as Couette, uniformly as diffusivity vanishes.

desk verdict A genuinely promising stable mixing estimate, but the proof as written only covers bounded-derivative shears because (4.5) uses a pointwise upper bound on u' that (H) does not provide. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.01310 v1 pith:OKKVKKSL submitted 2019-09-03 math.AP physics.flu-dyn

Michele Coti Zelati This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APphysics.flu-dyn MSC 35K1535Q3576F2576R50
keywords mixingenhanceddiffusionhypocoercivityvectorfieldshearflowsdrift-diffusionequationPécletnumbernegativeSobolevnorms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that a passive scalar advected by a strictly monotone shear flow decays in the negative-order Sobolev norm $\dot{H}^{-1}$ at the combined rate $e^{-\varepsilon_0 \nu^{1/3}t}/\sqrt{1+t^2}$, uniformly for all diffusivities $\nu \in [0,\nu_0]$. The estimate is the first of its kind beyond the Couette flow, whose explicit Fourier solution, dating to 1887, was the only previously known case. The proof combines a hypocoercivity argument with a time-dependent vector field $J=\partial_y+t\,u'(y)\partial_x$ that commutes with the transport operator; the $L^2$ norms of $f$ and $Jf$ together control $t\|f\|_{\dot{H}^{-1}}$. If correct, it shows that enhanced diffusion and inviscid mixing are not competing effects but two sides of a single estimate, valid across the whole Péclet number range.

What carries the argument

The engine is the vector field $J=\partial_y+t\,u'(y)\partial_x$, chosen so that $[J,\partial_t+u\partial_x]=0$. Applying the hypocoercivity method simultaneously to $f$ and $Jf$ gives exponential $L^2$ decay for both; because $Jf(0)=\partial_y f_{\mathrm{in}}$ and because $t\|f_k\|_{\dot{H}^{-1}}\le 2U^2(\|f_k\|+\|Jf_k\|)$ (Lemma 3.2), the two decay bounds combine into the extra $t^{-1}$ factor. The energy functionals $\Phi_k$ and $\mathcal{J}_k$, with coefficients $\alpha\sim \nu^{2/3}k^{-2/3}$, $\beta\sim \nu^{1/3}k^{-4/3}$, $\gamma\sim k^{-2}$, enforce the sharp enhanced-diffusion rate $\nu^{1/3}k^{2/3}$, while the error terms coming from $[J,\partial_{yy}]\neq 0$ are absorbed using the structural bounds in (H).

What would settle it

A direct test: solve $\partial_t f+u\partial_x f=\nu\partial_{yy}f$ numerically for $u(y)=y+\tfrac12\sin y$, which satisfies (H), with a smooth mean-free datum such as $\cos x\,e^{-y^2}$; at $\nu=0$, if $\|f_\neq(t)\|_{\dot{H}^{-1}}$ decays slower than a constant times $1/\sqrt{1+t^2}$, the inviscid mixing claim in Theorem 1.1 is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 1.1: for any shear profile $u \in C^3$ satisfying the structural condition (H), the solution to $\partial_t f+u(y)\partial_x f=\nu\partial_{yy}f$ with mean-free initial datum obeys $$\|f_{\neq}(t)\|_{\dot{H}^{-1}} \le \frac{C_0 $e^{{-\varepsilon_0 \nu^{1/3}}$t}}{\sqrt{1+$t^{2}$}}\left[\|f_{\mathrm{in},{\neq}}\|_{u'}+\|\partial_y f_{\mathrm{in},{\neq}}\|_{u'}\right]$$ for all $t\ge 0$ and all $\nu\in[0,\nu_0]$, with constants depending only on the structural constant $U$. Setting $\nu=0$ recovers the inviscid algebraic mixing estimate, so the exponential enhanced-diffusion factor does not destroy the $t^{-1}$ decay as the Péclet number tends to infinity. All constants are explicit, and the proof is carried out mode-by-mode in the $x$-Fourier variable.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the structural condition (H): the shear's slope $u'(y)$ is uniformly positive and its second and third derivatives never dominate the slope by more than a fixed factor; without that control, the commutator error terms from the vector-field method cannot be closed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The enhanced-diffusion rate $\nu^{1/3}$ holds for general monotone shear flows on $\mathbb{T}\times\mathbb{R}$, so homogenization occurs at time $O(\nu^{-1/3})$ for every non-zero $x$-Fourier mode.
  • At $\nu=0$ the same proof yields inviscid mixing in $\dot{H}^{-1}$ with algebraic $t^{-1}$ decay for all shears satisfying (H), not just Couette.
  • The uniform-in-$\nu$ form means the infinite Péclet number limit is well behaved: the inviscid mixing estimate is recovered by simply setting $\nu=0$ in the combined bound.
  • Mode-by-mode, the estimate quantifies the hypoelliptic regularization of the drift-diffusion equation from $L^2$ toward Gevrey-$\frac32$ regularity.
  • The characteristic filamentation scale $\lambda(t)=\|f_\neq(t)\|_{\dot{H}^{-1}}/\|f_\neq(t)\|_{L^2}$ tends to $0$ as $t\to\infty$ when $\nu=0$ and the non-mean modes are nonzero, since the $L^2$ norm is conserved while the $\dot{H}^{-1}$ norm decays.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same two-level energy argument should extend to other transport-diffusion equations equipped with a vector field that commutes with transport, such as linearized Euler or $\beta$-plane dynamics, giving simultaneous inviscid damping and stable mixing.
  • Because the theorem's constants are explicit functions of $U$, a reader could compute sharp bounds for a given profile and compare with numerical or experimental mixing times.
  • The sharp boundary of the $t^{-1}$ rate is probably set by the structural condition (H): oscillatory monotone shears with bounded slope but unbounded curvature may mix at a slower rate or require a different weight, a question the paper leaves open.
  • A natural testable extension is to time-averaged or time-dependent shear flows: replacing $J$ by an exact commuting field with non-constant coefficients would give stable mixing in settings where the explicit Fourier solution is unavailable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the drift-diffusion equation ∂t f + u(y)∂x f = ν∂yy f on T×R for a strictly monotone shear u satisfying the structural condition (H) in Section 1.1, and claims two quantitative estimates that are uniform as ν → 0: exponential decay of the weighted L2 norm ||f_≠||_{u'} at rate ν^{1/3}, and a stable mixing estimate bounding ||f_≠||_{\dot H^{-1}} by C0 e^{-ε0 ν^{1/3} t}(1+t^2)^{-1/2} times the weighted H1 norm of the initial datum. The proof is based on an x-Fourier decomposition, a hypocoercive energy functional Φ_k for f, a companion energy functional J_k built from the time-dependent vector field J = ∂y + t u' ∂x that commutes with the transport part, and Lemma 3.2, which converts control of ||Jf_k|| into decay of the homogeneous H^{-1} norm. The paper is self-contained and the constants are explicit.

Significance. If the main theorem were established for the full class allowed by (H), it would be the first stable mixing estimate for non-Couette monotone shear flows, combining the sharp inviscid t^{-1} decay of the H^{-1} norm with the sharp ν^{1/3} enhanced-dissipation rate. The vector-field mechanism and the simultaneous energy estimates for f and Jf are elegant and likely to be influential. However, as written the proof of the main theorem does not cover the unbounded-derivative examples advertised in Remark 1.2, because Section 4 uses a pointwise upper bound on u' that is not part of (H). With a repaired argument or a restricted theorem statement, the contribution would be solid.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 4, Eq. (4.7)] The step leading to (4.5) uses the inequality ||Jf||² ≤ 2||∂y f||² + 2k²t²U²||f||². Since Jf = ∂y f + t u' ∂x f and ||∂x f|| = k||f||, this inequality is equivalent to the pointwise bound |u'| ≤ U. Assumption (H) only gives 1/U ≤ u' and bounds on |u''|/u' and |u'''|/u', and it explicitly allows u(y)=y+e^y and u(y)=y(1+|y|^{n-1}) in Remark 1.2. For such u, ||u' f||/||f|| is unbounded over data localized at large y, so the displayed inequality fails by an arbitrarily large factor. This is load-bearing: (4.5) is used for the mean-value argument producing (4.7)–(4.8) and hence the final bounds (4.11)–(4.13), which feed into Theorem 4.1(4.2) and Theorem 1.1(1.11). The proof as written therefore establishes the stable mixing estimate only for the restricted class u' ∈ [1/U,U], not for the class stated in the main theorem. The author should either replace (4.5) with a weighted estimate using (4.6), which is available, or restrict the theorem and adjust Remark 1.2 accordingly.
minor comments (5)
  1. The symbol ∇ in (4.7) should be ∂y. The preceding mean-value argument only bounds the y-derivatives ||∂y f(t⋆)|| and ||∂y Jf(t⋆)||, and the next display (4.10) uses ∂y. This appears to be a typo rather than a substantive issue.
  2. In the displayed inequality before (4.5), the term δ0||∇Jf||² should be δ0||∂y Jf||², consistent with the subsequent line and with the actual estimate obtained from (3.8) and (3.17).
  3. The statement of Lemma 3.2 contains the typo 'There there holds'; it should read 'There holds'.
  4. The proof defines Tν,k = 1/(ν^{1/3}k^{2/3}) and splits into t ≥ Tν,k and t < Tν,k. This is meaningful only for ν>0, while Theorem 4.1 and Theorem 1.1 include ν=0. The inviscid case is sketched earlier in Section 3.1 via the conservation of ||f||²+||Jf||² and Lemma 3.2, but the proof of Theorem 4.1 should explicitly separate ν=0 to avoid a logical gap.
  5. The passage from the per-mode estimates of Theorem 4.1 to the global estimates of Theorem 1.1 is not written out. It is straightforward: square (4.2), use 1/(1+(kt)^2) ≤ 1/(1+t^2) and e^{-2ε0ν^{1/3}k^{2/3}t} ≤ e^{-2ε0ν^{1/3}t} for k≥1, then sum over k. A sentence making this explicit would be helpful.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the main estimates are derived from explicit energy inequalities and an independently proved vector-field lemma, with no fitted input renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Theorem 1.1 is reached through the hypocoercivity functionals Phi_k (2.3) and J_k (3.2), with coefficients (2.1)-(2.2) chosen explicitly to close the differential inequalities; the constants alpha_0, beta_0, gamma_0, epsilon_0, nu_0, delta_0 are fixed by the error estimates (2.17), (3.24), and (4.3), not by the decay being proved. The H^{-1} bound is obtained from Lemma 3.2, which is proved directly from monotonicity and gives kt ||f_k||_{dot H^{-1}} <= 2U^2 (||f_k|| + ||J f_k||); this is an independent estimate invoked after the energy bounds, not assumed as the target. The enhanced diffusion estimate (4.1) and stable mixing estimate (4.2) follow from the differential inequalities (2.5) and (3.5) via the combined energy argument (4.4)-(4.13), and no parameter is fitted to the quantities that the theorem bounds. Prior citations, including the vector-field method attributed to [44] and the weighted norm noted in [16], are contextual: the needed Lemma 3.2 is proven in the paper, and the weighted norm is introduced by definition (1.9) rather than derived from the conclusion. No self-citation carries a load-bearing uniqueness or existence claim, and no known result is merely renamed. Potential concerns about the proof's validity under unbounded u' would be correctness issues, not circularity; no circular step can be exhibited from the text.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The proof is self-contained and relies on standard PDE tools; the only input is the shear flow structure (H) and finite weighted norm of the data. The constants in the energy functionals are chosen explicitly to close the estimates and are not fitted to any data.

free parameters (6)
  • α_0 = 1/(4 × 3504 U^6)
    Hand-chosen to close the hypocoercivity energy estimates; appears in α = α_0 ν^{-2/3} k^{-2/3} in (2.1).
  • β_0 = 4 α_0^2
    Chosen to satisfy β^2/(αγ) = 1/8; used in error estimates in Sections 2 and 3.
  • γ_0 = 128 α_0^3
    Hand-chosen with β_0 to close the γ-term estimates.
  • ε_0 = β_0/(32 U^2)
    Decay rate in Theorem 1.1; determined by the structural constants.
  • ν_0 = (β_0/(4 × 7008 U^8))^{3/2}
    Smallness threshold in Theorem 1.1 ensuring the closure of the J-energy estimates.
  • δ_0 = 1/(4 × 3504 U^6)
    Weight used to combine the f and Jf energies in Section 4.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Hypothesis (H): 1/U ≤ u'(y), |u''(y)|/u'(y) ≤ U, |u'''(y)|/u'(y) ≤ U for all y ∈ R.
    Defines the class of shear flows; used in every estimate involving u', u'', u'''.
  • domain assumption Initial datum has finite weighted norm ||f_in,≠||_{u'} < ∞.
    Theorem 1.1 requires this because the weighted norm appears on the right-hand side.
  • standard math Fourier decomposition in x on T×R and standard L2 energy arguments.
    The proof reduces (1.8) to a family of 1D equations via Fourier series.
  • domain assumption Existence of solutions to (1.8) in the weighted energy class.
    The paper assumes a sufficiently regular solution to perform the energy estimates; standard for linear parabolic equations with smooth coefficients.
invented entities (1)
  • Vector field J = ∂_y + t u'(y) ∂_x
    purpose: Commutes with the transport part ∂_t + u∂_x; its L2 norm together with the L2 norm of f bounds the H^{-1} norm (Lemma 3.2).
    A proof device adapted from [44]; no independent physical prediction, but it is introduced and used consistently within the argument.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stable mixing estimates in the infinite P\'eclet number limit." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OKKVKKSL

@misc{pith2026190901310,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stable mixing estimates in the infinite P\'eclet number limit},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OKKVKKSL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.01310}
}
abstract

We consider a passive scalar $f$ advected by a strictly monotone shear flow and with a diffusivity parameter $\nu\ll 1$. We prove an estimate on the homogeneous $\dot{H}^{-1}$ norm of $f$ that combines both the $L^2$ enhanced diffusion effect at a sharp rate proportional to $\nu^{1/3}$, and the sharp mixing decay proportional to $t^{-1}$ of the $\dot{H}^{-1}$ norm of $f$ when $\nu=0$. In particular, the estimate is stable in the infinite P\'eclet number limit, as $\nu\to 0$. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result of this kind since the work of Kelvin in 1887 on the Couette flow. The two key ingredients in the proof are an adaptation of the hypocoercivity method and the use of a vector field $J$ that commutes with the transport part of the equation. The $L^2$ norm of $Jf$ together with the $L^2$ norm of $f$ produces a suitable upper bound for the $\dot{H}^{-1}$ norm of the solution that gives the extra decay factor of $t^{-1}$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [44]

    D. Wei, Z. Zhang, and H. Zhu, Linear inviscid damping for the β -plane equation, arXiv e-prints (Sep. 2018), available at 1809.03065

    arXiv 2018

  2. [1]

    Alberti, G

    G. Alberti, G. Crippa, and A. L. Mazzucato, Exponential self-similar mixing by incompressible flows , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 32 (2019), no. 2, 445–490

    work page 2019

  3. [2]

    Bajer, A

    K. Bajer, A. P Bassom, and A. D Gilbert, Accelerated diffusion in the centre of a vortex , Journal of Fluid Mechanics 437 (2001), 395–411

    work page 2001

  4. [3]

    Beck and C

    M. Beck and C. E. Wayne, Metastability and rapid convergence to quasi-stationary b ar states for the two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 143 (2013), no. 5, 905–927

    work page 2013

  5. [4]

    Bedrossian, P

    J. Bedrossian, P . Germain, and N. Masmoudi, Dynamics near the subcritical transition of the 3D Couette fl ow I: Below threshold case, ArXiv e-prints (June 2015), available at 1506.03720

    arXiv 2015

  6. [5]

    Bedrossian, P

    J. Bedrossian, P . Germain, and N. Masmoudi, Dynamics near the subcritical transition of the 3D Couette fl ow II: Above threshold case, ArXiv e-prints (June 2015), available at 1506.03721

    arXiv 2015

  7. [6]

    Bedrossian and M

    J. Bedrossian and M. Coti Zelati, Enhanced dissipation, hypoellipticity, and anomalous sma ll noise inviscid limits in shear flows , Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 224 (2017), no. 3, 1161–1204

    work page 2017

  8. [7]

    Bedrossian, M

    J. Bedrossian, M. Coti Zelati, and N. Glatt-Holtz, Invariant Measures for Passive Scalars in the Small Noise In viscid Limit, Comm. Math. Phys. 348 (2016), no. 1, 101–127

    work page 2016

Show all 49 references
  1. [8]

    Bedrossian, M

    J. Bedrossian, M. Coti Zelati, and V . Vicol, V ortex axisymmetrization, inviscid damping, and vorticit y depletion in the linearized 2D Euler equations , Ann. PDE 5 (2019), no. 1, Art. 4, 192

    2019

  2. [9]

    Bedrossian, P

    J. Bedrossian, P . Germain, and N. Masmoudi, On the stability threshold for the 3D Couette flow in Sobolev r egularity, Ann. of Math. (2) 185 (2017), no. 2, 541–608

    2017

  3. [10]

    Bedrossian, N

    J. Bedrossian, N. Masmoudi, and V . Vicol, Enhanced dissipation and inviscid damping in the inviscid l imit of the Navier- Stokes equations near the two dimensional Couette flow , Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 219 (2016), no. 3, 1087–1159. STABLE MIXING ESTIMA TES IN THE INFINITE P...

    2016

  4. [11]

    Bedrossian, V

    J. Bedrossian, V . Vicol, and F. Wang, The Sobolev stability threshold for 2D shear flows near Couet te, J. Nonlinear Sci. 28 (2018), no. 6, 2051–2075

    2018

  5. [12]

    Bressan, A lemma and a conjecture on the cost of rearrangements, Rend

    A. Bressan, A lemma and a conjecture on the cost of rearrangements, Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Padova 110 (2003), 97–102

    2003

  6. [13]

    Constantin, A

    P . Constantin, A. Kiselev, L. Ryzhik, and A. Zlatos, Diffusion and mixing in fluid flow , Ann. of Math. (2) 168 (2008), no. 2, 643–674

    2008

  7. [14]

    Coti Zelati, M

    M. Coti Zelati, M. G. Delgadino, and T. M. Elgindi, On the relation between enhanced dissipation time-scales and mixing rates, to appear in Comm. Pure Appl. Math., ArXiv e-prints (June 20 18), available at 1806.03258

    arXiv

  8. [15]

    Coti Zelati and M

    M. Coti Zelati and M. Dolce, Separation of time-scales in drift-diffusion equations on R2, arXiv e-prints (July 2019), available at 1907.04012

    2019 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Coti Zelati, T

    M. Coti Zelati, T. M. Elgindi, and K. Widmayer, Enhanced dissipation in the Navier-Stokes equations near t he Poiseuille flow , arXiv e-prints (Jan. 2019), available at 1901.01571

    2019 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Coti Zelati and C

    M. Coti Zelati and C. Zillinger, On degenerate circular and shear flows: the point vortex and p ower law circular flows , Comm. Partial Differential Equations 44 (2019), no. 2, 110–155

    2019

  11. [18]

    Crippa and C

    G. Crippa and C. De Lellis, Estimates and regularity results for the DiPerna-Lions flow , J. Reine Angew. Math. 616 (2008), 15–46

    2008

  12. [19]

    Crippa, R

    G. Crippa, R. Luc` a, and C. Schulze, Polynomial mixing under a certain stationary Euler flow , Phys. D 394 (2019), 44–55

    2019

  13. [20]

    Deng, Resolvent estimates for a two-dimensional non-self-adjoi nt operator, Commun

    W. Deng, Resolvent estimates for a two-dimensional non-self-adjoi nt operator, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 12 (2013), no. 1, 547–596

    2013

  14. [21]

    B Dubrulle and S Nazarenko, On scaling laws for the transition to turbulence in uniform- shear flows , Euro. Phys. Lett. 27 (1994), no. 2, 129

    1994

  15. [22]

    Gallay, Enhanced dissipation and axisymmetrization of two-dimens ional viscous vortices , Arch

    T. Gallay, Enhanced dissipation and axisymmetrization of two-dimens ional viscous vortices , Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 230 (2018), no. 3, 939–975

    2018

  16. [23]

    Grenier, T

    E. Grenier, T. T. Nguyen, F. Rousset, and A. Soffer, Linear inviscid damping and enhanced viscous dissipation o f shear flows by using the conjugate operator method , ArXiv e-prints (Apr. 2018), available at 1804.08291

    2018 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Ibrahim, Y

    S. Ibrahim, Y . Maekawa, and N. Masmoudi, On pseudospectral bound for non-selfadjoint operators and its application to stability of Kolmogorov flows , ArXiv e-prints (Oct. 2017), available at 1710.05132

    2017 arXiv

  18. [25]

    G. Iyer, A. Kiselev, and X. Xu, Lower bounds on the mix norm of passive scalars advected by in compressible enstrophy- constrained flows , Nonlinearity 27 (2014), no. 5, 973–985

    2014

  19. [26]

    Jabin, Critical non-Sobolev regularity for continuity equations with rough velocity fields , J

    P .-E. Jabin, Critical non-Sobolev regularity for continuity equations with rough velocity fields , J. Differential Equations 260 (2016), no. 5, 4739–4757

    2016

  20. [27]

    Kelvin, Stability of fluid motion: rectilinear motion of viscous flui d between two parallel plates , Phil

    L. Kelvin, Stability of fluid motion: rectilinear motion of viscous flui d between two parallel plates , Phil. Mag. 24 (1887), no. 5, 188–196

  21. [28]

    Latini and A

    M. Latini and A. J. Bernoff, Transient anomalous diffusion in Poiseuille flow , Journal of Fluid Mechanics 441 (2001), 399–411

    2001

  22. [29]

    T. Li, D. Wei, and Z. Zhang, Pseudospectral and spectral bounds for the Oseen vortices o perator, ArXiv e-prints (Jan. 2017), available at 1701.06269

    2017 arXiv

  23. [30]

    T. Li, D. Wei, and Z. Zhang, Pseudospectral bound and transition threshold for the 3D Ko lmogorov flow , arXiv e-prints (Jan. 2018), available at 1801.05645

    2018 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Lin, J.-L

    Z. Lin, J.-L. Thiffeault, and C. R. Doering, Optimal stirring strategies for passive scalar mixing , J. Fluid Mech. 675 (2011), 465–476

    2011

  25. [32]

    Lunasin, Z

    E. Lunasin, Z. Lin, A. Novikov, A. Mazzucato, and C. R. Do ering, Optimal mixing and optimal stirring for fixed energy, fixed power , or fixed palenstrophy flows , J. Math. Phys. 53 (2012), no. 11, 115611, 15

    2012

  26. [33]

    C. J. Miles and C. R. Doering, Diffusion-limited mixing by incompressible flows , Nonlinearity 31 (2018), no. 5, 2346–2350

    2018

  27. [34]

    O. Reynolds, An experimental investigation of the circumstances which d etermine whether the motion of water shall be direct or sinuous, and of the law of resistance in parallel ch annels, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 174 (1883), 935–982

  28. [35]

    P . B. Rhines and W. R. Y oung, How rapidly is a passive scalar mixed within closed streamli nes?, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 133 (1983), 133–145

    1983

  29. [36]

    Seis, Maximal mixing by incompressible fluid flows , Nonlinearity 26 (2013), no

    C. Seis, Maximal mixing by incompressible fluid flows , Nonlinearity 26 (2013), no. 12, 3279–3289

    2013

  30. [37]

    Tao and J

    L. Tao and J. Wu, The 2D Boussinesq equations with vertical dissipation and l inear stability of shear flows , J. Differential Equations 267 (2019), no. 3, 1731–1747

    2019

  31. [38]

    Villani, Hypocoercivity, Mem

    C. Villani, Hypocoercivity, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 202 (2009), no. 950, iv+141

    2009

  32. [39]

    Wei and Z

    D. Wei and Z. Zhang, Transition threshold for the 3D Couette flow in Sobolev space , ArXiv e-prints (Mar. 2018), available at 1803.01359

    2018 arXiv

  33. [40]

    D. Wei, Z. Zhang, and W. Zhao, Linear inviscid damping and enhanced dissipation for the Ko lmogorov flow , ArXiv e-prints (Nov. 2017), available at 1711.01822

    2017 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Wei and Z

    D. Wei and Z. Zhang, Enhanced dissipation for the Kolmogorov flow via the hypocoe rcivity method, Sci. China Math. 62 (2019), no. 6, 1219–1232

    2019

  35. [42]

    D. Wei, Z. Zhang, and W. Zhao, Linear inviscid damping for a class of monotone shear flow in S obolev spaces, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 71 (2018), no. 4, 617–687

    2018

  36. [43]

    D. Wei, Z. Zhang, and W. Zhao, Linear inviscid damping and vorticity depletion for shear fl ows, Ann. PDE 5 (2019), no. 1, Art. 3, 101. 16 M. COTI ZELA TI

    2019

  37. [45]

    Yao and A

    Y . Yao and A. Zlatos, Mixing and un-mixing by incompressible flows , J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 19 (2017), no. 7, 1911–1948

    2017

  38. [46]

    Zillinger, On geometric and analytic mixing scales: comparability and convergence rates for transport problems , ArXiv e-prints (Apr

    C. Zillinger, On geometric and analytic mixing scales: comparability and convergence rates for transport problems , ArXiv e-prints (Apr. 2018), available at 1804.11299

    2018 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Zillinger, Linear inviscid damping for monotone shear flows in a finite pe riodic channel, boundary effects, blow-up and critical Sobolev regularity, Arch

    C. Zillinger, Linear inviscid damping for monotone shear flows in a finite pe riodic channel, boundary effects, blow-up and critical Sobolev regularity, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 221 (2016), no. 3, 1449–1509

    2016

  40. [48]

    Zillinger, Linear inviscid damping for monotone shear flows , Trans

    C. Zillinger, Linear inviscid damping for monotone shear flows , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 369 (2017), no. 12, 8799–8855

    2017

  41. [49]

    Zillinger, On circular flows: linear stability and damping , J

    C. Zillinger, On circular flows: linear stability and damping , J. Differential Equations 263 (2017), no. 11, 7856–7899

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.