Pith. sign in

REVIEW

The Fibonacci Quilt Game

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.01938 v1 pith:W2HRGFOM submitted 2019-09-04 math.NT math.CO

classification math.NTmath.CO
keywords gamefibonaccizeckendorfdecompositionquiltrecurrencesequencegeneralization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Zeckendorf proved that every positive integer can be expressed as the sum of non-consecutive Fibonacci numbers. This theorem inspired a beautiful game, the Zeckendorf Game. Two players begin with $n \ 1$'s and take turns applying rules inspired by the Fibonacci recurrence, $F_{n+1} = F_n + F_{n-1}$, until a decomposition without consecutive terms is reached; whoever makes the last move wins. We look at a game resulting from a generalization of the Fibonacci numbers, the Fibonacci Quilt sequence. These arise from the two-dimensional geometric property of tiling the plane through the Fibonacci spiral. Beginning with 1 in the center, we place integers in the squares of the spiral such that each square contains the smallest positive integer that does not have a decomposition as the sum of previous terms that do not share a wall. This sequence eventually follows two recurrence relations, allowing us to construct a variation on the Zeckendorf Game, the Fibonacci Quilt Game. While some properties of the Fibonaccis are inherited by this sequence, the nature of its recurrence leads to others, such as Zeckendorf's theorem, no longer holding; it is thus of interest to investigate the generalization of the game in this setting to see which behaviors persist. We prove, similar to the original game, that this game also always terminates in a legal decomposition, give a lower bound on game lengths, show that depending on strategies the length of the game can vary and either player could win, and give a conjecture on the length of a random game.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools