Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 48 references

$C^0$ stability of boundary actions and inequivalent Anosov flows

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that small continuous perturbations of the boundary action of a negatively curved manifold's fundamental group are always topological factors of that action, and uses this to build hyperbolic 3-manifolds with arbitrarily…

desk verdict The main theorems are strong and likely correct; the flagged soft spot in Theorem 1.3 is real but mostly an exposition problem, not a load-bearing flaw. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.02324 v3 pith:POE6X3OQ submitted 2019-09-05 math.DS math.GT

Jonathan Bowden , Kathryn Mann This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DSmath.GT MSC 37D2037D4037C8557M50
keywords boundaryactionstopologicalstabilitysemi-conjugacyAnosovflowsskew-AnosovslitheringsDehnsurgeryhyperbolic3-manifolds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes a $C^0$ topological stability theorem for the natural action of the fundamental group of a closed negatively curved manifold on its boundary sphere at infinity: every representation into the homeomorphism group of the sphere that is sufficiently close to this boundary action is a topological factor of it, with a semi-conjugacy that can be chosen arbitrarily close to the identity. A surface-specialized version gives a global rigidity statement: for the slithering actions associated to skew-Anosov flows on 3-manifolds, the entire connected component of the action in the representation space consists of weakly conjugate representations. The authors then convert this rigidity into a construction of hyperbolic 3-manifolds supporting arbitrarily many pairwise topologically inequivalent Anosov flows, resolving a long-standing problem-list question and giving concrete volume-preserving contact examples. The same quasi-geodesic straightening technique also reproves the topological stability of geodesic flows in negative curvature.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a leafwise immersion $f_\rho$ from the suspension bundle of a nearby representation into the unit tangent bundle of the universal cover, sending horizontal leaves to $C^1$ submanifolds whose tangent distribution is uniformly close to the weak-stable distribution. Intersecting these images with unstable leaves pulls back an oriented uniform quasi-geodesic foliation, whose positive and negative endpoint maps are continuous and equivariant. A uniform convergence group argument shows the positive endpoint map is constant on each horizontal leaf, so it descends to the semi-conjugacy between the nearby representation and the boundary action. In the circle case the same construction yields a homeomorphism, and straightening quasi-geodesics along strong unstable leaves produces the monotone map that defines weak conjugacy.

What would settle it

In the $k$-fold fiberwise cover of the unit tangent bundle, take two lifts from the family that differ by the allowed rotations and compare the fiber winding numbers of their horizontal lifts of the filling geodesic; if the winding numbers differ for any such pair, the lifts are not freely homotopic, so the Dehn-surgered manifolds are not the same and the claimed number of inequivalent flows on a single manifold would not follow.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that $C^0$-small perturbations of a boundary action remain topologically constrained: they are factors of the original action, not merely nearby in the representation space. In dimension two the factor map can be chosen to be a homeomorphism, which upgrades local rigidity to the global statement that the connected component of a skew-Anosov slithering action—the circle action induced by the associated equivariant fibration of the universal cover—is a single weak conjugacy class, meaning all nearby actions are intertwined by a monotone degree-one circle map. For flows, the same framework shows that Dehn surgery along lifts of an asymmetric filling geodesic to fiberwise covers of the unit tangent bundle produces linearly many (in the covering degree) topologically inequivalent skew-Anosov flows on one hyperbolic manifold.

Load-bearing premise

The construction of many inequivalent flows on a single hyperbolic manifold rests on the unproved assertion that, for large covering degree, the chosen family of lifts has horizontal lifts of the fixed filling geodesic that are all isotopic; if those lifts are not isotopic, the Dehn-surgered manifolds may differ and the claimed count of inequivalent flows on one manifold would collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For any compact orientable negatively curved manifold, every sufficiently $C^0$-close representation of its fundamental group in $\mathrm{Homeo}(S^{n-1})$ is a topological factor of the boundary action, with the factor map close to the identity.
  • For a skew-Anosov flow on a closed 3-manifold, the connected component of its slithering action in $\mathrm{Hom}(\pi_1 M, \mathrm{Homeo}^+(S^1))$ consists entirely of weakly conjugate representations.
  • For every positive integer $N$, some closed hyperbolic 3-manifold admits $N$ topologically inequivalent Anosov flows, and these can be chosen skew and contact.
  • The quasi-geodesic straightening proof also gives an alternative route to the topological stability of geodesic flows on negatively curved manifolds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The count of roughly $k/3$ inequivalent flows is probably not optimal; a finer analysis of the isotopy classes of horizontal lifts under larger allowed rotations could yield more inequivalent flows for the same covering degree.
  • The proof of the boundary stability theorem uses smooth Riemannian data, so a purely coarse-geometric version would be needed to extend the statement to hyperbolic groups whose boundary is a sphere, a direction the authors explicitly leave open.
  • The examples of non-conjugate nearby actions suggest that the entire germ of non-injectivity of the semi-conjugacy may be understood through monotone or Peano-curve-type collapsing maps, which would give a classification of all $C^0$-small factors near a boundary action.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves a C0 (compact-open) topological stability theorem for the boundary action of the fundamental group of a closed, orientable negatively curved manifold on its visual boundary sphere: every sufficiently nearby representation is a topological factor of the standard boundary action (Theorem 1.1). The proof proceeds by constructing, for each nearby representation, a quasi-geodesic foliation on the suspended bundle and deriving a continuous, equivariant, surjective endpoint map. The same techniques are adapted to prove a global rigidity result for slithering actions of 3-manifold groups arising from skew-Anosov flows (Theorem 1.2), yielding a new proof of Mann's earlier theorem on global C0 rigidity of geometric surface group actions on S1 (Theorem 5.12). As a further application, the paper constructs hyperbolic 3-manifolds admitting arbitrarily many pairwise topologically inequivalent Anosov flows (Theorem 1.3), addressing Problem 3.53(C) from Kirby's list, by Dehn surgery on fiberwise covers of the unit tangent bundle of a hyperbolic surface along a carefully chosen asymmetric filling geodesic.

Significance. If the proofs are correct, the paper makes substantial contributions. Theorem 1.1 is a strong C0 stability statement for boundary actions in variable negative curvature, going beyond previous Lipschitz-topology results. Theorem 1.2 gives a global rigidity theorem for slithering actions of skew-Anosov flows and a new proof of a known theorem of Mann. Theorem 1.3 resolves a long-standing question of Christy from Kirby's problem list, producing the first hyperbolic 3-manifolds supporting arbitrarily many inequivalent Anosov flows. The constructions are explicit and the paper gives clear geometric intuition. The main arguments are detailed and rely on standard tools from hyperbolic geometry, foliation theory, and Anosov flow theory. However, as detailed below, the proof of Theorem 1.3 contains a load-bearing gap concerning the isotopy of horizontal lifts, and Lemma 6.3(2) leaves a nontrivial combinatorial argument as an exercise.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 6, 'Set-up and standing assumptions' (proof of Theorem 1.3)] The assertion that one can choose C(k) lifts of ρ with C∞-close holonomies and pairwise isotopic horizontal lifts of the filling geodesic c is not proved. The text states: 'when k is large, we may choose r1 and r2 to vary by only a small family of rotations, so that the holonomies ... remain C∞ close ... This will give us some number C(k) of lifts of c which are sufficiently close to each other to be isotopic, where C(k) grows linearly in k.' This is load-bearing because the conclusion that the Dehn-surgered manifolds are diffeomorphic for all chosen lifts depends on the horizontal lifts being isotopic; if isotopy fails, the surgered manifolds may differ and the desired collection of inequivalent flows on a single manifold is not obtained. Two specific issues arise. First, the tradeoff between the size of the rotation family and the growth of C(k) is not quantified: a family of rotations of size O(εk) gives only O(εk) lifts, while taking r1,r2 of size O(k) (e.g., to obtain a fixed proportion such as k/3) makes the holonomies not close in any reasonable sense. Since the theorem only needs C(k)→∞, a small family with ε>0 would suffice, but this is not stated and the linear growth claim is left vague. Second, C∞-closeness of holonomies is not obviously sufficient to conclude that the horizontal lifts of c are isotopic as periodic orbits; isotopy of closed orbits under a continuously varying family of Anosov flows is a dynamical statement that is neither proved nor cited. The proof should either provide a detailed argument (e.g., using structural stability or a shadowing/continuity argument for the lifts) or explicitly state and prove the needed isotopy lemma.
  2. [Lemma 6.3(2)] The proof of asymmetry of the filling curve c leaves the key graph-automorphism argument as 'an elementary exercise.' Specifically, after establishing that the two large complementary regions must be preserved, the text asserts that the inequalities ni>m_{i-1}+1 and mi>n_i+1 ensure that the 'grids' of quadrilaterals have no nontrivial symmetries and cannot be permuted, and concludes inductively that each complementary region is fixed. This is a nontrivial combinatorial claim, and it is load-bearing: Lemma 6.5 and Lemma 6.6(2) rely on it to conclude that a finite-order homeomorphism preserving K is homotopic to the identity, which in turn is essential for the proof of inequivalence of the constructed flows. The authors should provide a complete proof of the graph-automorphism rigidity, or at least a detailed sketch sufficient for the reader to verify the induction without filling in a substantial gap.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout (Section 5.5, Remark 6.1, Section 6)] The manuscript contains unresolved placeholders '??' in cross-references and a section heading: 'Section 5.5. Fiberwise covers of the geodesic flow. ??', 'Recall from Section ??' in Remark 6.1, and 'Recall from Section ??' in the proof of Theorem 1.3. These should be filled in before publication, as the reader cannot verify the claims that depend on the missing material.
  2. [Introduction and Section 6] There are several typographical errors: 'contstruction' appears in the introduction ('See [20] for a general contstruction of contact Anosov flows'), and 'Bonnati' should be 'Bonatti' in the reference to Beguin–Bonatti–Yu.
  3. [Lemma 3.1, surface case] In the final paragraph of the proof of Lemma 3.1, the assertion that the averaging trick on the ordered real line produces a homeomorphism and that 'it is easy to verify that its inverse is also continuous' is somewhat compressed. A few more sentences explaining the bijectivity and continuity of the inverse would help the reader.
  4. [Proof of Theorem 1.4] The final step of the proof, where the orbit-space map is promoted to a topological equivalence using Barbot's averaging trick, is only sketched. Since this is a secondary result, a reference to the precise statements in [2, Theorem 3.4] and [25, Lemmas 4.3, 4.4] is given, but the exposition would benefit from a brief indication of how the averaging argument applies.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: main theorems are derived from external geometric and foliation results; Theorem 5.12 is an application, not an input.

full rationale

I walked the derivation chain of Theorems 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, and 5.12. Theorem 1.1 builds the semi-conjugacy from an explicitly constructed leafwise map f_ρ and endpoint maps of a quasi-geodesic foliation; the factor property is proved, not assumed. Theorem 1.2 uses standard external input (Hirsch–Pugh C^1 regularity, Fenley–Barbot structure of skew-Anosov flows, Thurston's universal circle, and the Ghys–Matsumoto closure-of-conjugacy-class theorem) and a local-to-global open/closed argument; none of these inputs is the target rigidity statement, and the result of [38] is not used as a premise. Theorem 1.3 applies Fried–Goodman surgery and Shannon's theorem plus a rotation-number obstruction; the inequivalence argument is a genuine dynamical comparison, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The one questionable point, the linear-growth isotopy assertion in Section 6, is a potential correctness gap: the text says 'when k is large, we may choose r1 and r2 to vary by only a small family of rotations, so that the holonomies of the lifted representations ... remain C∞ close to each other ... This will give us some number C(k) of lifts of c which are sufficiently close to each other to be isotopic.' This is an unproved technical claim, but it is not circular: the conclusion does not reduce to an input by construction. Self-citations occur (e.g., Mann [38] is quoted as the theorem being reproved), but they are explicitly presented as applications or context, not as load-bearing justification. I therefore find no significant circularity; score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard background in hyperbolic geometry, foliation theory, and 3-manifold topology. No numerical parameters are fitted and no new entities are postulated. The only ad hoc load-bearing assertion is the unproved isotopy of horizontal lifts in Theorem 1.3, which should be supplied or proved.

assumptions (8)
  • standard math Boundary of universal cover of compact negatively curved manifold is a sphere; the fundamental group action is a uniform convergence group.
    Used in Theorem 1.1 proof via Proposition 2.1 (Bowditch [9]) to control endpoints.
  • standard math Quasi-geodesics in delta-hyperbolic spaces fellow-travel geodesics and satisfy the local-to-global principle.
    Lemmas 2.2-2.4 from [15], [10]; basis of quasi-geodesic straightening.
  • domain assumption Weak stable and unstable foliations of a 3D Anosov flow are C1 (Hirsch-Pugh) and leaves are bi-Lipschitz to the hyperbolic plane.
    Proposition 5.1 [33]; needed for Lemma 3.1 and endpoint arguments in Proposition 5.9.
  • standard math Closure of a conjugacy class in Hom(Gamma, Homeo_+(S1)) is a weak conjugacy class (Ghys, Matsumoto).
    Used in Proposition 5.10 (closedness); cited to [26], [40], exposition [39].
  • domain assumption Fried surgery on a transitive Anosov flow yields a genuinely Anosov flow (Shannon); surgery of slope -p on lifts of geodesic flow yields skew-Anosov flows (Fenley).
    Propositions 6.8, 6.9; [24], [28], [44], [17].
  • standard math Mostow-Prasad rigidity, Thurston hyperbolisation, and geometrisation for the cusped manifold M-K.
    Used in Lemmas 6.4 and 6.6.
  • ad hoc to paper For large k, small C-infinity perturbations of the lift rho yield isotopic horizontal lifts of the filling geodesic c.
    Asserted in proof of Theorem 1.3; not proved; load-bearing for the count of inequivalent flows.
  • standard math Cannon's characterization of (n-1)-dimensional Sierpinski space and Moore's theorem on upper-semicontinuous decompositions.
    Used in the blow-up example (Prop 4.1).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of $C^0$ stability of boundary actions and inequivalent Anosov flows." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/POE6X3OQ

@misc{pith2026190902324,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: $C^0$ stability of boundary actions and inequivalent Anosov flows},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/POE6X3OQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.02324}
}
abstract

We give a topological stability result for the action of the fundamental group of a compact manifold of negative curvature on its boundary at infinity: any nearby action of this group by homeomorphisms of the sphere is semi-conjugate to the standard boundary action. Using similar techniques we prove a global rigidity result for the "slithering actions" of 3-manifold groups that come from skew-Anosov flows. As applications, we construct hyperbolic 3-manifolds that admit arbitrarily many topologically inequivalent Anosov flows, answering a question from Kirby's problem list, and also give a more conceptual proof of a theorem of the second author on {\em global} $C^0$--rigidity of geometric surface group actions on the circle.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.02324 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The map fρ and a leaf ` of F QG ρ 3.2. Quasi-geodesics and endpoint maps. Keeping the notation from Section 3.1, M denotes a compact, negatively curved Riemannian n-manifold, UTMf the unit tan￾gent bundle of Mf, and ρ0 denotes the standard boundary action of π1M on S n−1 . Let fρ : Mf × S n−1 → UTMf denote the π1M-equivariant map obtained by applying Lemma 3.1 to a representation ρ close to ρ0 in Hom(π1M, Homeo+(S n… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The flow space O of a skew-Anosov flow. The two black points are related by the natural map η on O induced foliated bundle over Mf. Skew-Anosov flows (a generalization of geodesic flows on negatively curved surfaces) provide another important source of examples. Example 5.3 (Skew-Anosov flows). Let Φt be an Anosov flow on a closed 3-manifold M, whose stable foliation is oriented and R-covered, meaning that the leaf … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A picture of σe(Mf) in the familiar case M = UTΣ as in [47]. The infinite cylinder is σe(Mf) ∼= Mf = H2 × Λ s i.e. the height of a point in the stack of copies of H2 corresponds to the positive endpoint of a unit tangent vector based at that point. Horizontal planes are leaves of F s , one is shown in blue. A leaf of σe(F u ) is shown in red, the hyperbolic metric on the leaf is that lifted from the projective model… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Quasi-geodesics in a leaf of F u and their images under eh1; leaves with common endpoints are identified. The red circle is a leaf of F uu universal circle perspective, as stated in Proposition 5.7. Following this, the negative and positive endpoint maps give local (fi…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The image of a leaf in the flow space O which is non￾horizontal is shown in light green. The black point is a periodic orbit corresponding to γ ∈ π1M and the lines in darker shades of green show the first few iterates under the action of γ. Since eh1(F QG) is a π1M-equ…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The curve c3,5 on T Notation 6.2. Let T be a one-holed torus, and a, b simple, oriented curves representing standard generators of π1(T). Let cm,n denote a properly embedded arc with endpoints on ∂T, constructed by first following a simple subarc that wraps n times in …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Part of the curve c from Lemma 6.3 minimal self-intersection number. Since no regions are triangles, Hass and Scott’s the￾orem implies that cgeo (which is a geodesic, hence also has minimal self-intersection number) must be attainable from c by ambient isotopy of Σg. T…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Manifolds of nonpositive cur- vature, volume 61 of Progress in Mathematics

    Werner Ballmann, Mikhael Gromov, and Viktor Schroeder. Manifolds of nonpositive cur- vature, volume 61 of Progress in Mathematics. Birkh¨ auser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1985

    work page 1985

  2. [2]

    Caract´ erisation des flots d’Anosov en dimension 3 par leurs feuilletages faibles

    Thierry Barbot. Caract´ erisation des flots d’Anosov en dimension 3 par leurs feuilletages faibles. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems , 15(2):247–270, 1995

    work page 1995

  3. [3]

    Generalizations of the Bonatti-Langevin example of Anosov flow and their classification up to topological equivalence

    Thierry Barbot. Generalizations of the Bonatti-Langevin example of Anosov flow and their classification up to topological equivalence. Comm. Anal. Geom., 6(4):749–798, 1998

    work page 1998

  4. [4]

    New contact anosov flows

    Thierry Barbot and S´ ergio Fenley. New contact anosov flows. in preparation

    work page

  5. [5]

    Thierry Barbot and S´ ergio R. Fenley. Pseudo-Anosov flows in toroidal manifolds. Geom. Topol., 17(4):1877–1954, 2013

    work page 1954

  6. [6]

    On hyperbolic groups with spheres as boundary

    Arthur Bartels, Wolfgang L¨ uck, and Shmuel Weinberger. On hyperbolic groups with spheres as boundary. J. Differential Geom., 86(1):1–16, 2010

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Building Anosov flows on 3-manifolds

    Fran¸ cois B´ eguin, Christian Bonatti, and Bin Yu. Building Anosov flows on 3-manifolds. Geom. Topol., 21(3):1837–1930, 2017

    work page 1930

  8. [8]

    Contact structures, deformations and taut foliations

    Jonathan Bowden. Contact structures, deformations and taut foliations. Geom. Topol., 20(2):697–746, 2016

    work page 2016

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Convergence groups and configuration spaces

    Brian Bowditch. Convergence groups and configuration spaces. In Geometric group theory down under (Canberra, 1996) , pages 23–54. de Gruyter, Berlin, 1999

    1996

  2. [10]

    Bridson and Andr´ e Haefliger

    Martin R. Bridson and Andr´ e Haefliger. Metric spaces of non-positive curvature , volume 319 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Math- ematical Sciences]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999

    1999

  3. [11]

    Filling geodesics and hyperbolic complements

    Danny Calegari. Filling geodesics and hyperbolic complements. blog entry, avail- able at https://lamington.wordpress.com/2012/02/11/filling-geodesics-and-hyperbolic- complements/

    2012

  4. [12]

    Universal circles for quasigeodesic flows

    Danny Calegari. Universal circles for quasigeodesic flows. Geom. Topol., 10:2271–2298, 2006

    2006

  5. [13]

    J. W. Cannon. A positional characterization of the ( n− 1)-dimensional Sierpi´ nski curve in Sn(n⁄= 4). Fund. Math., 79(2):107–112, 1973

    1973

  6. [14]

    Cannon and William P

    James W. Cannon and William P. Thurston. Group invariant Peano curves. Geom. Topol., 11:1315–1355, 2007

    2007

  7. [15]

    Quasi-g´ eod´ esiques et quasi-isom´ etries dans les espaces hyperboliques

    Michel Coornaert, Thomas Delzant, and Athanase Papadopoulos. Quasi-g´ eod´ esiques et quasi-isom´ etries dans les espaces hyperboliques. InGeometrie et theorie des groupes: Les groupes hyperboliques de Gromov. Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1990

    1990

  8. [16]

    Davis, T

    M. Davis, T. Januszkiewicz, and J.-F. Lafont. 4-dimensional locally CAT(0)-manifolds with no Riemannian smoothings. Duke Math. J. , 161(1):1–28, 2012

    2012

  9. [17]

    S´ ergio R. Fenley. Anosov flows in 3-manifolds.Ann. of Math. (2) , 139(1):79–115, 1994

    1994

  10. [18]

    Local rigidity of group actions: past, present, future

    David Fisher. Local rigidity of group actions: past, present, future. In Dynamics, ergodic theory, and geometry , volume 54 of Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ. , pages 45–97. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2007

    2007

  11. [19]

    Almost isometric actions, property (T), and local rigidity

    David Fisher and Gregory Margulis. Almost isometric actions, property (T), and local rigidity. Invent. Math., 162(1):19–80, 2005

    2005

  12. [20]

    Contact Anosov flows on hyperbolic 3-manifolds

    Patrick Foulon and Boris Hasselblatt. Contact Anosov flows on hyperbolic 3-manifolds. Geom. Topol., 17(2):1225–1252, 2013

    2013

  13. [21]

    Orbit growth of contact structures after surgery

    Patrick Foulon, Boris Hasselblatt, and Anne Vaugon. Orbit growth of contact structures after surgery. 2019. arXiv:1910.14357 [math.DS]

    2019 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Coarse hyperbolicity and closed orbits for quasigeodesic flows

    Steven Frankel. Coarse hyperbolicity and closed orbits for quasigeodesic flows. Ann. of Math. (2), 188(1):1–48, 2018. 40 JONATHAN BOWDEN AND KATHRYN MANN

    2018

  15. [23]

    Anomalous Anosov flows

    John Franks and Bob Williams. Anomalous Anosov flows. In Global theory of dynamical systems (Proc. Internat. Conf., Northwestern Univ., Evanston, Ill., 1979) , volume 819 of Lecture Notes in Math. , pages 158–174. Springer, Berlin, 1980

    1979

  16. [24]

    Transitive Anosov flows and pseudo-Anosov maps

    David Fried. Transitive Anosov flows and pseudo-Anosov maps. Topology, 22(3):299–303, 1983

    1983

  17. [25]

    Flots d’Anosov sur les 3-vari´ et´ es fibr´ ees en cercles.Ergodic Theory Dynam

    ´Etienne Ghys. Flots d’Anosov sur les 3-vari´ et´ es fibr´ ees en cercles.Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 4(1):67–80, 1984

    1984

  18. [26]

    Groupes d’hom´ eomorphismes du cercle et cohomologie born´ ee

    ´Etienne Ghys. Groupes d’hom´ eomorphismes du cercle et cohomologie born´ ee. InThe Lef- schetz centennial conference, Part III (Mexico City, 1984) , volume 58 of Contemp. Math., pages 81–106. Amer. Math. Soc., 1987

    1984

  19. [27]

    Rigidit´ e diff´ erentiable des groupes fuchsiens.Inst

    ´Etienne Ghys. Rigidit´ e diff´ erentiable des groupes fuchsiens.Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. Publ. Math., (78):163–185 (1994), 1993

    1994

  20. [28]

    Dehn surgery on Anosov flows

    Sue Goodman. Dehn surgery on Anosov flows. In Geometric dynamics (Rio de Janeiro, 1981), volume 1007 of Lecture Notes in Math. , pages 300–307. Springer, Berlin, 1983

    1981

  21. [29]

    Thurston

    Michael Handel and William P. Thurston. Anosov flows on new three manifolds. Invent. Math., 59(2):95–103, 1980

    1980

  22. [30]

    Shortening curves on surfaces

    Joel Hass and Peter Scott. Shortening curves on surfaces. Topology, 33(1):25–43, 1994

    1994

  23. [31]

    Geometry of horospheres.J

    Ernst Heintze and Hans-Christoph Im Hof. Geometry of horospheres.J. Differential Geom., 12(4):481–491 (1978), 1977

    1978

  24. [32]

    M. W. Hirsch, C. C. Pugh, and M. Shub. Invariant manifolds . Lecture Notes in Mathe- matics, Vol. 583. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1977

    1977

  25. [33]

    Hirsch and Charles C

    Morris W. Hirsch and Charles C. Pugh. Smoothness of horocycle foliations. J. Differential Geometry, 10:225–238, 1975

    1975

  26. [34]

    Sullivan’s structural stability of expanding group actions

    Michael Kapovich, Sungwoon Kim, and Jaejeong Lee. Sullivan’s structural stability of expanding group actions. arXiv:1904.06921 [math.GR]

    1904 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Topological stability of Anosov flows and their centralizers

    Kazuhisa Kato and Akihiko Morimoto. Topological stability of Anosov flows and their centralizers. Topology, 12:255–273, 1973

    1973

  28. [36]

    Katok and J

    A. Katok and J. Lewis. Local rigidity for certain groups of toral automorphisms. Israel J. Math., 75(2-3):203–241, 1991

    1991

  29. [37]

    Problems in low dimensional manifold theory

    Rob Kirby. Problems in low dimensional manifold theory. InAlgebraic and geometric topol- ogy (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif., 1976), Part 2 , Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., XXXII, pages 273–312. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I., 1978

    1976

  30. [38]

    Spaces of surface group representations

    Kathryn Mann. Spaces of surface group representations. Invent. Math. , 201(2):669–710, 2015

    2015

  31. [39]

    Rigidity and geometricity for surface group actions on the circle

    Kathryn Mann and Maxime Wolff. Rigidity and geometricity for surface group actions on the circle. 2017. arXiv:1710.04902 [math.GT]

    2017 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Numerical invariants for semiconjugacy of homeomorphisms of the circle

    Shigenori Matsumoto. Numerical invariants for semiconjugacy of homeomorphisms of the circle. Proc. AMS, 98:163–168, 1986

    1986

  33. [41]

    Basic partitions and combinations of group actions on the circle: a new approach to a theorem of Kathryn Mann

    Shigenori Matsumoto. Basic partitions and combinations of group actions on the circle: a new approach to a theorem of Kathryn Mann. Enseign. Math., 62(1-2):15–47, 2016

    2016

  34. [42]

    R. L. Moore. Concerning upper semi-continuous collections of continua. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 27(4):416–428, 1925

    1925

  35. [43]

    On semi-stability for diffeomorphisms

    Zbigniew Nitecki. On semi-stability for diffeomorphisms. Invent. Math., 14:83–122, 1971

    1971

  36. [44]

    Flot d’anosov et hyperbolicit´ e partiel en 3-varietes

    Mario Shannon. Flot d’anosov et hyperbolicit´ e partiel en 3-varietes. PhD Thesis, Dijon

  37. [45]

    Quasiconformal homeomorphisms and dynamics

    Dennis Sullivan. Quasiconformal homeomorphisms and dynamics. II. Structural stability implies hyperbolicity for Kleinian groups. Acta Math., 155(3-4):243–260, 1985

    1985

  38. [46]

    The geometry and topology of 3-manifolds

    William Thurston. The geometry and topology of 3-manifolds. 360 pages, Lecture notes, http://www.msri.org/publications/books/ gt3m

  39. [47]

    Three manifolds, foliations and circles i

    William Thurston. Three manifolds, foliations and circles i. preprint

  40. [48]

    Anosov diffeomorphisms are topologically stable

    Peter Walters. Anosov diffeomorphisms are topologically stable. Topology, 9:71–78, 1970. C0 STABILITY OF BOUNDARY ACTIONS AND INEQUIV ALENT ANOSOV FLOWS 41 Mathematische F akult¨at Universit ¨at Regensburg 93053 Regensburg, Germany Email address : jonathan.bowden@math.uni-regen...

    1970

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.