Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 124 references

A Census of Early Phase High-Mass Star Formation in the Central Molecular Zone

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A C-band census of the inner 200 pc shows high-mass star formation in the Central Molecular Zone is only beginning in seven isolated clouds, about ten times less efficient than the dense-gas relation predicts.

desk verdict Excellent census, but the 'factor of 10' SFR suppression may be only ~3x once the phase lifetime uncertainty is treated honestly. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.02338 v1 pith:5UBF4RJY submitted 2019-09-05 astro-ph.GA

Xing Lu , Elisabeth A. C. Mills , Adam Ginsburg , Daniel Walker , Ashley Barnes , Natalie Butterfield , Jonathan Henshaw , Cara Battersby
show 8 more authors
J. M. Diederik Kruijssen Steven N. Longmore Qizhou Zhang John Bally Jens Kauffmann Jürgen Ott Matthew Rickert Ke Wang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords CentralMolecularZonehigh-massstarformationultracompactHIIregionsclassmethanolmasersformaldehydeefficiencyGalacticcenterradiocontinuumcensus
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether the Milky Way's Central Molecular Zone suppresses the earliest stages of high-mass star formation, not just the later stages seen in earlier surveys. New C-band radio observations, complete to free-free emission from stars above roughly 10--11 $M_\odot$, reveal only five confirmed and twelve candidate ultracompact H II regions, together with 23 class II methanol masers and eight formaldehyde masers. These embedded young massive stars are concentrated in seven isolated clouds. Counting each unique tracer as one protostar yields a star formation rate of 0.025 $M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$, ten times below the 0.46 $M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ expected from the dense-gas star formation relation. The paper concludes that any impending burst of star formation in the CMZ has not yet begun.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a C-band radio continuum census at roughly one arcsecond resolution, complete for free-free emission from stars above about 10--11 $M_\odot$ in 91% of the surveyed inner 200 pc, paired with simultaneous spectral-line maps of 6.7 GHz class II methanol masers and 4.8 GHz formaldehyde masers. Ultracompact H II regions and class II methanol masers are treated as short-lived, extinction-free tracers of embedded high-mass star formation, and the formaldehyde masers add confirming excitation evidence. The counting identity is simple: each unique ultracompact H II region or class II methanol maser corresponds to one protostar above 10 $M_\odot$; a 0.3 Myr phase lifetime converts the accumulated 129 $M_\odot$ of protostars into a star formation rate, which is then compared with the dense-gas relation.

What would settle it

Measure the duration of the ultracompact H II region and class II methanol maser phase directly, for example in a sample of Galactic disk high-mass star-forming regions with independently calibrated star formation rates; a lifetime near 0.06 Myr rather than 0.3 Myr would make the observed 58 indicators correspond to about 0.46 $M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$, falsifying the claimed factor-of-ten suppression.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the factor-of-ten inefficiency of star formation in the Central Molecular Zone is already present in the youngest, most deeply embedded phase of massive-star birth, within about the last 0.3 Myr. The census finds 104 compact continuum sources, of which five are confirmed and twelve are candidate ultracompact H II regions, and it detects 23 class II methanol masers and eight formaldehyde masers. Only five regions show these early-phase tracers directly, and two additional clouds host known high-mass star formation without them, so current high-mass star formation is confined to seven isolated clouds. Combining the 41 previously known Sgr B2 ultracompact and hypercompact H II regions with new detections gives 58 unique indicators, representing roughly 129 $M_\odot$ of embedded massive stars and an inferred star formation rate of 0.025 $M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$, against 0.46 $M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ expected from the dense-gas star formation relation.

Load-bearing premise

The result collapses if the assumption that each detected ultracompact H II region or class II methanol maser marks exactly one protostar lasting 0.3 Myr is wrong; a phase shorter by a factor of about five, or a typical multiplicity of several massive stars per indicator, would bring the inferred star formation rate up to the expected value.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The factor-of-ten suppression in the CMZ is present in the first ~0.3 Myr of massive-star formation, so it is not introduced only by later feedback or dispersal.
  • The inner 200 pc contains no hidden population of massive protostars above the 10--11 $M_\odot$ completeness limit outside the seven active clouds.
  • The inferred rate of 0.025 $M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$ sets a strict upper bound for the currently ignited high-mass star formation; any next burst must take place in one of the seven clouds or in currently starless dense clouds.
  • Sgr C is confirmed as actively forming high-mass stars and is now the ninth known Galactic region with formaldehyde masers, showing that the suppression is patchy rather than uniform.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the assumed 0.3 Myr phase lifetime turns out to be roughly five times shorter, the same 58 indicators would give a star formation rate near the expected 0.46 $M_\odot$ yr$^{-1}$, so the early-phase suppression could disappear even if the evolved-phase suppression stands.
  • The fact that the dense gas is not currently producing massive protostars suggests the CMZ is storing gas and may require an external trigger, rather than spontaneous collapse, to start its next burst.
  • Radio recombination-line velocities for the twelve candidate ultracompact H II regions would settle their distances; if most lie in the CMZ the active-cloud count rises, while if they are foreground or background the factor-of-ten deficit strengthens.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper presents VLA C-band (4.2–6.9 GHz) continuum and spectral-line observations of the inner ~200 pc of the Central Molecular Zone (CMZ). The authors identify 104 compact continuum sources, classify 5 as confirmed and 12 as candidate ultracompact H II regions, detect 23 class II CH3OH masers (6 new) and 8 H2CO masers (2 new), and conclude that early-phase high-mass star formation is confined to seven known clouds. Comparing the observed number of early-phase tracers with the star formation rate expected from the dense-gas star formation relation (Lada et al. 2010), they claim that star formation in the CMZ is about 10 times less efficient than expected over the last ~0.3 Myr, extending previous results from more evolved phases to the youngest embedded phase.

Significance. The observational census is the main strength of the paper: it combines ~1 arcsecond resolution with sensitivity to free-free emission from stars above ~10–11 M_sun over 91% of the covered area, and it carefully separates UC H II regions from pulsars, evolved stars, and background AGN using spectral indices and multi-wavelength cross-matching. The public release of the continuum images is a useful community resource. If the factor-of-10 suppression were robust, the paper would provide an important constraint on episodic star formation models by showing that any upcoming burst had not yet begun in the embedded phase. However, the headline quantitative claim is not yet tightly constrained because of the assumed phase lifetime and the one-to-one counting of tracers, as detailed below; the census itself remains valuable independent of that specific factor.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.2.3, Table 6] The central claim that star formation is 'about 10 times less efficient' is directly proportional to the assumed 0.3 Myr lifetime of the traced phase, and this dependence is not propagated or discussed. With the paper's own numbers, the observed SFR is N_ind * 129 M_sun / t_phase; for t_phase = 0.3 Myr and N_ind = 58 this gives 0.025 M_sun/yr, compared with 0.46 M_sun/yr expected, i.e., a factor of about 18. If t_phase = 0.1 Myr, a value within the published range for UC H II regions (Wood & Churchwell 1989) and class II CH3OH masers (Breen et al. 2013), the observed SFR becomes 0.075 M_sun/yr and the deficit is about a factor of 6; applying the paper's own factor-of-2 allowance for multiplicity and maser variability reduces this to about 3. Because the expected protostar count of 940–1069 also scales with t_phase, the comparison should be presented as a function of t_phase or with a propagated range of lifetimes, and the abstract/conclusion statement should be softened accordingly.
  2. [Section 4.2.3, Table 6] The conversion of 58 indicators to an SFR assumes that each UC H II region or class II CH3OH maser corresponds to exactly one high-mass protostar above 10–11 M_sun. In practice a single UC H II region can be powered by a small group of massive stars, and maser variability affects the detectability of individual sources over time. The manuscript allows only a factor of 2 for these effects, with no derivation or cited distribution. Please replace this with a quantitative estimate of the multiplicity bias and a completeness correction for maser variability, or quote the SFR and the suppression factor as ranges rather than as a single value.
  3. [Section 4.2.3] The expected SFR of 0.46 M_sun/yr is obtained by applying the Lada et al. (2010) dense-gas relation to the entire CMZ gas mass of ~10^7 M_sun with a mean density of ~10^4 cm^-3, but the paper does not state whether this gas satisfies the same 'dense gas' definition (i.e., the column density or volume density threshold) used to calibrate the relation. If a substantial fraction of the CMZ gas lies below that threshold, the expected SFR is lower and the reported deficit shrinks. Please state the adopted threshold explicitly and, ideally, recompute the expectation from the measured dense-gas mass surface density in the surveyed area.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3.2] The phrase 'characteristic election temperature' should read 'electron temperature'.
  2. [Section 4.2.1] The sentence 'The three masers in Sgr C (M12, M22, and M23)' appears to be a typo: M12 is in Sgr B2, and the Sgr C masers are M21, M22, and M23.
  3. [Abstract and Section 4.1.4] The abstract states that five UC H II regions are confirmed, but two of these (C82 and C83) are associated with the foreground Pillar cloud (maser M20 at ~740 pc), as noted in Section 4.1.4. Please clarify that the CMZ census itself contains three confirmed UC H II regions from this work and that the remaining two are foreground sources.
  4. [Table 6, footnote b] The footnote reporting the 129 M_sun per indicator should explicitly state the IMF integration limits (0.01–150 M_sun, Kroupa 2001) and the assumed protostar mass threshold (>10 M_sun), so that the SFR conversion is reproducible without consulting Appendix D of Lu et al. (2019).
  5. [Section 1, Keywords] The keyword 'Galatic' is a typo for 'Galactic'.
  6. [Section 4.2.2] The statement that there are 'three regions in the CMZ vs. six in the Galactic disk' would be clearer if it named the three CMZ regions (Sgr B2, Dust Ridge cloud c, and Sgr C), especially because the new Sgr C detection makes it the ninth region overall.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the CMZ SFR comparison rests on external relations and a standard IMF conversion, not on fitted inputs or self-referential definitions.

full rationale

The derivation is not circular. The observed side of the factor-of-10 claim is a count of 58 unique indicators (Table 6) assembled from the new VLA data and published catalogs, while the expected side is SFR_expect = 0.46 Msun/yr from the external dense-gas relation of Lada et al. (2010) applied to ~1e7 Msun of gas. The conversion of 58 indicators to SFR_obs = 0.025 Msun/yr uses 129 Msun per high-mass protostar and a 0.3 Myr phase duration (Table 6 footnote; Section 4.2.3), with the 129 Msun value taken from Appendix D of Lu et al. (2019). That citation is a self-citation, but it is not a fitted input and does not contain the target result: it is a parameter-free Kroupa-IMF conversion with stated assumptions (Kroupa 2001; Davies et al. 2011), and the expected protostar count of 940-1069 is computed from the same external SFR, IMF, and timescale. Thus the comparison is not equivalent by construction to its inputs. The 0.3 Myr timescale is the dominant systematic: because both the indicator-derived SFR and the expected protostar count scale inversely with this assumed lifetime, a shorter lifetime would reduce the claimed deficit, and the paper itself only allows a factor-2 allowance for variability and multiplicity. The paper also flags that distances of UC H II candidates are still unknown and that many compact sources remain of undetermined nature. These are robustness and correctness caveats, not circularity. The qualitative conclusion that early-phase high-mass star formation in the CMZ is suppressed is supported by external benchmarks, so no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on literature inputs adopted without fitting: the Lada et al. dense gas SFR relation, a 0.3 Myr phase lifetime, the Kroupa IMF, and the 8.1 kpc distance. No free parameters are fitted in this paper; the detection thresholds are procedural choices. The ledger records the adopted assumptions and the procedural thresholds that set the source catalog.

free parameters (2)
  • Compact source detection thresholds = 5σ peak / 2.6σ flood / 800-pixel area limit
    Chosen following Hales et al. (2012) and prior surveys; sets the 104-source catalog that underlies the census. Not fitted to the central result.
  • Maser detection threshold = 5σ in at least two channels (1σ = 8 mJy per beam per channel)
    Set by the authors in Section 3.3; defines the 23 methanol masers and 8 formaldehyde masers. Standard practice, not tuned to the SFR conclusion.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The dense gas star formation relation of Lada et al. (2010), calibrated on nearby clouds, applies to the CMZ.
    Used in Section 4.2.3 to derive the expected SFR of 0.46 solar masses per year from the CMZ gas mass; if the relation does not extrapolate to CMZ conditions, the factor-10 deficit is a comparison artifact.
  • domain assumption The combined UC H II plus class II CH3OH maser phase lasts about 0.3 Myr for a high-mass protostar.
    Adopted from Davies et al. (2011) in Section 4.2.3 to convert indicator counts to SFR; shorter lifetimes would raise the inferred SFR.
  • domain assumption The Kroupa (2001) IMF between 0.01 and 150 solar masses describes the stellar population.
    Used to compute the expected number of protostars above 10 to 11 solar masses (Section 4.2.3, following Appendix D of Lu et al. 2019).
  • domain assumption Class II CH3OH masers at 6.668 GHz uniquely trace high-mass star formation.
    Used in Section 4.2.1 to interpret maser detections as high-mass star formation indicators; supported by cited surveys such as Menten (1991) and Ellingsen (2006).
  • domain assumption The CMZ is at a distance of 8.1 kpc.
    Adopted from Gravity Collaboration et al. (2018) throughout; affects physical scale, completeness limits, and the SFR normalization.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Census of Early Phase High-Mass Star Formation in the Central Molecular Zone." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5UBF4RJY

@misc{pith2026190902338,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Census of Early Phase High-Mass Star Formation in the Central Molecular Zone},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5UBF4RJY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.02338}
}
abstract

We present new observations of C-band continuum emission and masers to assess high-mass ($>$8 $M_\odot$) star formation at early evolutionary phases in the inner 200 pc of the Central Molecular Zone (CMZ) of the Galaxy. The continuum observation is complete to free-free emission from stars above 10-11 $M_\odot$ in 91% of the covered area. We identify 104 compact sources in the continuum emission, among which five are confirmed ultracompact H II regions, 12 are candidates of ultra-compact H II regions, and the remaining 87 sources are mostly massive stars in clusters, field stars, evolved stars, pulsars, extragalactic sources, or of unknown nature that is to be investigated. We detect class II CH$_3$OH masers at 23 positions, among which six are new detections. We confirm six known H$_2$CO masers in two high-mass star forming regions, and detect two new H$_2$CO masers toward the Sgr C cloud, making it the ninth region in the Galaxy that contains masers of this type. In spite of these detections, we find that current high-mass star formation in the inner CMZ is only taking place in seven isolated clouds. The results suggest that star formation at early evolutionary phases in the CMZ is about 10 times less efficient than expected by the dense gas star formation relation, which is in line with previous studies that focus on more evolved phases of star formation. This means that if there will be any impending, next burst of star formation in the CMZ, it has not yet begun.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.02338 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overview of the Sgr B2 tile. The background image shows the VLA C-band continuum emission in the linear scale, which is truncated at an intensity of 0.01 Jy beam−1 to highlight faint sources. The unit of the color bar attached to the image top is Jy beam−1 . The cyan dashed loop shows the FWHM of primary beam response of the mosaic. Small boxes mark identified compact sources, among which UC H II candidates and conf… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of the Dust Ridge tile. Contours and symbols are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Overview of the Sgr A tile. Contours and symbols are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Overview of the Sgr C tile. Contours and symbols are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: CH3OH and H2CO masers, marked by magenta circles and green diamonds, respectively. Background images show the VLA C-band continuum emission. Red boxes mark the compact sources that are identified in continuum (see Figures 2–5) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Spectra of the CH3OH and H2CO masers. 4.1. Identification of UC H II Regions Five of the identified compact sources are spatially associ￾ated with classII CH3OH masers (C23, C82, C83, C102, and C103; see Sections 3.3, 3.4, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    `DY@ K 7A N f hBĵu ( I DZtS

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

    2017

  4. [4]

    V., Sellgren , K., et al

    An , D., Ram \' rez , S. V., Sellgren , K., et al. 2011, , 736, 133, 10.1088/0004-637X/736/2/133

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/736/2/133 2011

  5. [5]

    D., Bania , T

    Anderson , L. D., Bania , T. M., Balser , D. S., et al. 2014, , 212, 1, 10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/1

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/1 2014

  6. [6]

    M., et al

    Ao , Y., Henkel , C., Menten , K. M., et al. 2013, , 550, A135, 10.1051/0004-6361/201220096

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220096 2013

  7. [7]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  8. [8]

    A., Wilson , R

    Bally , J., Stark , A. A., Wilson , R. W., & Henkel , C. 1987, , 65, 13, 10.1086/191217

    doi:10.1086/191217 1987

Show all 124 references
  1. [9]

    T., Longmore , S

    Barnes , A. T., Longmore , S. N., Battersby , C., et al. 2017, , 469, 2263, 10.1093/mnras/stx941

    2017 doi

  2. [10]

    T., Longmore , S

    Barnes , A. T., Longmore , S. N., Avison , A., et al. 2019, , 486, 283, 10.1093/mnras/stz796

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    2011, , 535, A128, 10.1051/0004-6361/201116559

    Battersby , C., Bally , J., Ginsburg , A., et al. 2011, , 535, A128, 10.1051/0004-6361/201116559

    2011 doi

  4. [12]

    H., White , R

    Becker , R. H., White , R. L., Helfand , D. J., & Zoonematkermani , S. 1994, , 91, 347, 10.1086/191941

    1994 doi

  5. [13]

    1996, , 117, 393, 10.1051/aas:1996164

    Bertin , E., & Arnouts , S. 1996, , 117, 393, 10.1051/aas:1996164

    1996 doi

  6. [14]

    G., Beuther , H., et al

    Bihr , S., Johnston , K. G., Beuther , H., et al. 2016, , 588, A97, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527697

    2016 doi

  7. [15]

    L., Ellingsen , S

    Breen , S. L., Ellingsen , S. P., Contreras , Y., et al. 2013, , 435, 524, 10.1093/mnras/stt1315

    2013 doi

  8. [16]

    C., Morris , M., Mills , E

    Butterfield , N., Lang , C. C., Morris , M., Mills , E. A. C., & Ott , J. 2018, , 852, 11, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa886e

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    Caswell , J. L. 1996, , 283, 606, 10.1093/mnras/283.2.606

    1996 doi

  10. [18]

    1998, , 297, 215, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01468.x

    ---. 1998, , 297, 215, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01468.x

    1998

  11. [19]

    2009, PASA, 26, 454, 10.1071/AS09013

    ---. 2009, PASA, 26, 454, 10.1071/AS09013

    2009 doi

  12. [20]

    L., Batchelor , R

    Caswell , J. L., Batchelor , R. A., Forster , J. R., & Wellington , K. J. 1983, AuJPh, 36, 401, 10.1071/PH830401b

    1983 doi

  13. [21]

    L., Fuller , G

    Caswell , J. L., Fuller , G. A., Green , J. A., et al. 2010, , 404, 1029, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16339.x

    2010

  14. [22]

    T., Yusef-Zadeh , F., & Ott , J

    Chambers , E. T., Yusef-Zadeh , F., & Ott , J. 2014, , 563, A68, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322752

    2014 doi

  15. [23]

    T., Yusef-Zadeh , F., & Roberts , D

    Chambers , E. T., Yusef-Zadeh , F., & Roberts , D. 2011, , 733, 42, 10.1088/0004-637X/733/1/42

    2011 doi

  16. [24]

    2002, , 40, 27, 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093845

    Churchwell , E. 2002, , 40, 27, 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093845

    2002

  17. [25]

    D., & Yusef-Zadeh , F

    Cotton , W. D., & Yusef-Zadeh , F. 2016, , 227, 10, 10.3847/0067-0049/227/1/10

    2016 doi

  18. [26]

    J., Whitney , B

    Cyganowski , C. J., Whitney , B. A., Holden , E., et al. 2008, , 136, 2391, 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2391

    2008 doi

  19. [27]

    E., Kruijssen , J

    Dale , J. E., Kruijssen , J. M. D., & Longmore , S. N. 2019, , 486, 3307, 10.1093/mnras/stz888

    2019 doi

  20. [29]

    G., Gaume , R

    de Pree , C. G., Gaume , R. A., Goss , W. M., & Claussen , M. J. 1995, , 451, 284, 10.1086/176218

    1995 doi

  21. [30]

    1996, , 464, 788, 10.1086/177364

    ---. 1996, , 464, 788, 10.1086/177364

    1996 doi

  22. [31]

    G., Peters , T., Mac Low , M

    De Pree , C. G., Peters , T., Mac Low , M. M., et al. 2015, , 815, 123, 10.1088/0004-637X/815/2/123

    2015 doi

  23. [32]

    R., Wang , Q

    Dong , H., Mauerhan , J., Morris , M. R., Wang , Q. D., & Cotera , A. 2015, , 446, 842, 10.1093/mnras/stu2116

    2015 doi

  24. [34]

    H., Sch \"o del , R., et al

    Dong , H., Lacy , J. H., Sch \"o del , R., et al. 2017, , 470, 561, 10.1093/mnras/stx1266

    2017 doi

  25. [35]

    D., van Gorkom , J

    Ekers , R. D., van Gorkom , J. H., Schwarz , U. J., & Goss , W. M. 1983, , 122, 143

    1983

  26. [36]

    Ellingsen , S. P. 2006, , 638, 241, 10.1086/498673

    2006 doi

  27. [37]

    M., Longmore , S

    Federrath , C., Rathborne , J. M., Longmore , S. N., et al. 2016, , 832, 143, 10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/143

    2016 doi

  28. [38]

    R., & Caswell , J

    Forster , J. R., & Caswell , J. L. 2000, , 530, 371, 10.1086/308347

    2000 doi

  29. [39]

    Gaia Collaboration , Brown , A. G. A., Vallenari , A., et al. 2018, , 616, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833051

    2018 doi

  30. [40]

    A., Claussen , M

    Gaume , R. A., Claussen , M. J., de Pree , C. G., Goss , W. M., & Mehringer , D. M. 1995, , 449, 663, 10.1086/176087

    1995 doi

  31. [41]

    2015, , 584, L7, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527452

    Ginsburg , A., Walsh , A., Henkel , C., et al. 2015, , 584, L7, 10.1051/0004-6361/201527452

    2015 doi

  32. [42]

    2016, , 586, A50, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526100

    Ginsburg , A., Henkel , C., Ao , Y., et al. 2016, , 586, A50, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526100

    2016 doi

  33. [43]

    2018, , 853, 171, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa6d4

    Ginsburg , A., Bally , J., Barnes , A., et al. 2018, , 853, 171, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa6d4

    2018 doi

  34. [44]

    H., Helfand , D

    Giveon , U., Becker , R. H., Helfand , D. J., & White , R. L. 2005, , 129, 348, 10.1086/426360

    2005 doi

  35. [46]

    2018, , 615, L15, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833718

    Gravity Collaboration , Abuter , R., Amorim , A., et al. 2018, , 615, L15, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833718

    2018 doi

  36. [47]

    2017, , 471, 210, 10.1093/mnras/stx1162

    Guidetti , D., Bondi , M., Prandoni , I., et al. 2017, , 471, 210, 10.1093/mnras/stx1162

    2017 doi

  37. [48]

    A., Murphy , T., Curran , J

    Hales , C. A., Murphy , T., Curran , J. R., et al. 2012, , 425, 979, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21373.x

    2012

  38. [49]

    J., Lau , R

    Hankins , M. J., Lau , R. M., Mills , E. A. C., Morris , M. R., & Herter , T. L. 2019, , 877, 22, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab174e

    2019 doi

  39. [50]

    J., Lau , R

    Hankins , M. J., Lau , R. M., Morris , M. R., & Herter , T. L. 2017, , 837, 79, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5f5b

    2017 doi

  40. [51]

    D., Ginsburg , A., Haworth , T

    Henshaw , J. D., Ginsburg , A., Haworth , T. J., et al. 2019, , 485, 2457, 10.1093/mnras/stz471

    2019 doi

  41. [52]

    Houghton , S., & Whiteoak , J. B. 1995, , 273, 1033, 10.1093/mnras/273.4.1033

    1995 doi

  42. [53]

    M., Schuller , F., & Lis , D

    Immer , K., Menten , K. M., Schuller , F., & Lis , D. C. 2012 a , , 548, A120, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219182

    2012 doi

  43. [54]

    Immer , K., Schuller , F., Omont , A., & Menten , K. M. 2012 b , , 537, A121, 10.1051/0004-6361/201117857

    2012 doi

  44. [55]

    Jeffreson , S. M. R., Kruijssen , J. M. D., Krumholz , M. R., & Longmore , S. N. 2018, , 478, 3380, 10.1093/mnras/sty1154

    2018 doi

  45. [56]

    A., Burton , M

    Jones , P. A., Burton , M. G., Cunningham , M. R., Tothill , N. F. H., & Walsh , A. J. 2013, , 433, 221, 10.1093/mnras/stt717

    2013 doi

  46. [57]

    2010, , 723, L7, 10.1088/2041-8205/723/1/L7

    Kauffmann , J., & Pillai , T. 2010, , 723, L7, 10.1088/2041-8205/723/1/L7

    2010 doi

  47. [58]

    2013, , 765, L35, 10.1088/2041-8205/765/2/L35

    Kauffmann , J., Pillai , T., & Zhang , Q. 2013, , 765, L35, 10.1088/2041-8205/765/2/L35

    2013 doi

  48. [59]

    2017 a , , 603, A89, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628088

    Kauffmann , J., Pillai , T., Zhang , Q., et al. 2017 a , , 603, A89, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628088

    2017 doi

  49. [60]

    2017 b , , 603, A90, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628089

    ---. 2017 b , , 603, A90, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628089

    2017 doi

  50. [61]

    2013, , 775, L50, 10.1088/2041-8205/775/2/L50

    Kendrew , S., Ginsburg , A., Johnston , K., et al. 2013, , 775, L50, 10.1088/2041-8205/775/2/L50

    2013 doi

  51. [62]

    M., Robitaille , T

    Koepferl , C. M., Robitaille , T. P., Morales , E. F. E., & Johnston , K. G. 2015, , 799, 53, 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/53

    2015 doi

  52. [63]

    2017, , 850, 77, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa951c

    Krieger , N., Ott , J., Beuther , H., et al. 2017, , 850, 77, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa951c

    2017 doi

  53. [64]

    2001, , 322, 231, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x

    Kroupa , P. 2001, , 322, 231, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x

    2001

  54. [65]

    Kruijssen , J. M. D., Dale , J. E., & Longmore , S. N. 2015, , 447, 1059, 10.1093/mnras/stu2526

    2015 doi

  55. [66]

    Kruijssen , J. M. D., Longmore , S. N., Elmegreen , B. G., et al. 2014, , 440, 3370, 10.1093/mnras/stu494

    2014 doi

  56. [67]

    Kruijssen , J. M. D., Dale , J. E., Longmore , S. N., et al. 2019, , 484, 5734, 10.1093/mnras/stz381

    2019 doi

  57. [68]

    R., & Kruijssen , J

    Krumholz , M. R., & Kruijssen , J. M. D. 2015, , 453, 739, 10.1093/mnras/stv1670

    2015 doi

  58. [69]

    R., Kruijssen , J

    Krumholz , M. R., Kruijssen , J. M. D., & Crocker , R. M. 2017, , 466, 1213, 10.1093/mnras/stw3195

    2017 doi

  59. [70]

    R., & McKee , C

    Krumholz , M. R., & McKee , C. F. 2008, , 451, 1082, 10.1038/nature06620

    2008 doi

  60. [71]

    J., Lombardi , M., & Alves , J

    Lada , C. J., Lombardi , M., & Alves , J. F. 2010, , 724, 687, 10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/687

    2010 doi

  61. [72]

    C., Goss , W

    Lang , C. C., Goss , W. M., Cyganowski , C., & Clubb , K. I. 2010, , 191, 275, 10.1088/0067-0049/191/2/275

    2010 doi

  62. [73]

    C., Goss , W

    Lang , C. C., Goss , W. M., & Morris , M. 2001, , 121, 2681, 10.1086/320373

    2001 doi

  63. [74]

    C., Johnson , K

    Lang , C. C., Johnson , K. E., Goss , W. M., & Rodr \' guez , L. F. 2005, , 130, 2185, 10.1086/496976

    2005 doi

  64. [75]

    Lazio , T. J. W., & Cordes , J. M. 2008, , 174, 481, 10.1086/521676

    2008 doi

  65. [76]

    S., & Spiker , R

    Liszt , H. S., & Spiker , R. W. 1995, , 98, 259, 10.1086/192160

    1995 doi

  66. [77]

    Y., & Claussen , M

    Lo , K. Y., & Claussen , M. J. 1983, , 306, 647, 10.1038/306647a0

    1983 doi

  67. [78]

    N., Bally , J., Testi , L., et al

    Longmore , S. N., Bally , J., Testi , L., et al. 2013 a , , 429, 987, 10.1093/mnras/sts376

    2013 doi

  68. [79]

    N., Kruijssen , J

    Longmore , S. N., Kruijssen , J. M. D., Bally , J., et al. 2013 b , , 433, L15, 10.1093/mnrasl/slt048

    2013 doi

  69. [80]

    2015, , 814, L18, 10.1088/2041-8205/814/2/L18

    Lu , X., Zhang , Q., Kauffmann , J., et al. 2015, , 814, L18, 10.1088/2041-8205/814/2/L18

    2015 doi

  70. [81]

    2017, , 839, 1, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa67f7

    ---. 2017, , 839, 1, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa67f7

    2017 doi

  71. [82]

    2019, , 872, 171, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab017d

    ---. 2019, , 872, 171, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab017d

    2019 doi

  72. [83]

    A., Lang , C

    Ludovici , D. A., Lang , C. C., Morris , M. R., et al. 2016, , 826, 218, 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/218

    2016 doi

  73. [84]

    C., Cotera , A., Dong , H., et al

    Mauerhan , J. C., Cotera , A., Dong , H., et al. 2010 a , , 725, 188, 10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/188

    2010 doi

  74. [85]

    C., Muno , M

    Mauerhan , J. C., Muno , M. P., Morris , M. R., Stolovy , S. R., & Cotera , A. 2010 b , , 710, 706, 10.1088/0004-637X/710/1/706

    2010 doi

  75. [86]

    P., Waters , B., Schiebel , D., Young , W., & Golap , K

    McMullin , J. P., Waters , B., Schiebel , D., Young , W., & Golap , K. 2007, in ASP Conf. Ser., Vol. 376, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, ed. R. A. Shaw , F. Hill , & D. J. Bell (San Francisco, CA: ASP) , 127

    2007

  76. [87]

    M., Goss , W

    Mehringer , D. M., Goss , W. M., & Palmer , P. 1994, , 434, 237, 10.1086/174721

    1994 doi

  77. [88]

    M., Palmer , P., & Goss , W

    Mehringer , D. M., Palmer , P., & Goss , W. M. 1995, , 97, 497, 10.1086/192148

    1995 doi

  78. [89]

    M., Palmer , P., Goss , W

    Mehringer , D. M., Palmer , P., Goss , W. M., & Yusef-Zadeh , F. 1993, , 412, 684, 10.1086/172954

    1993 doi

  79. [90]

    E., Leroy , A

    Meidt , S. E., Leroy , A. K., Rosolowsky , E., et al. 2018, , 854, 100, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa290

    2018 doi

  80. [91]

    1991, in ASP Conf.\ Ser., Vol

    Menten , K. 1991, in ASP Conf.\ Ser., Vol. 16, Atoms, Ions and Molecules: New Results in Spectral Line Astrophysics, ed. A. D. Haschick & P. T. P. Ho (San Francisco: ASP) , 119

    1991

  81. [92]

    G., Smith , L

    Mezger , P. G., Smith , L. F., & Churchwell , E. 1974, , 32, 269

    1974

  82. [93]

    R., Lang , C

    Mills , E., Morris , M. R., Lang , C. C., et al. 2011, , 735, 84, 10.1088/0004-637X/735/2/84

    2011 doi

  83. [94]

    Mills , E. A. C., Butterfield , N., Ludovici , D. A., et al. 2015, , 805, 72, 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/72

    2015 doi

  84. [95]

    2010, , 518, L100, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014659

    Molinari , S., Swinyard , B., Bally , J., et al. 2010, , 518, L100, 10.1051/0004-6361/201014659

    2010 doi

  85. [96]

    P., Bauer , F

    Muno , M. P., Bauer , F. E., Bandyopadhyay , R. M., & Wang , Q. D. 2006, , 165, 173, 10.1086/504798

    2006 doi

  86. [97]

    P., Bauer , F

    Muno , M. P., Bauer , F. E., Baganoff , F. K., et al. 2009, , 181, 110, 10.1088/0067-0049/181/1/110

    2009 doi

  87. [98]

    A., Boji c i \'c , I

    Parker , Q. A., Boji c i \'c , I. S., & Frew , D. J. 2016, JPhCS, 728, 032008, 10.1088/1742-6596/728/3/032008

    2016 doi

  88. [99]

    M., Longmore , S

    Rathborne , J. M., Longmore , S. N., Jackson , J. M., et al. 2015, , 802, 125, 10.1088/0004-637X/802/2/125

    2015 doi

  89. [100]

    2019, , 482, 5349, 10.1093/mnras/sty2901

    Rickert , M., Yusef-Zadeh , F., & Ott , J. 2019, , 482, 5349, 10.1093/mnras/sty2901

    2019 doi

  90. [101]

    A., & Goss , W

    Roberts , D. A., & Goss , W. M. 1993, , 86, 133, 10.1086/191773

    1993 doi

  91. [102]

    2012, APLpy: Astronomical Plotting Library in Python , Astrophysics Source Code Library

    Robitaille , T., & Bressert , E. 2012, APLpy: Astronomical Plotting Library in Python , Astrophysics Source Code Library. 1208.017

    2012

  92. [103]

    F., & Zapata , L

    Rodr \' guez , L. F., & Zapata , L. A. 2013, , 767, L13, 10.1088/2041-8205/767/1/L13

    2013 doi

  93. [104]

    2013, , 766, 114, 10.1088/0004-637X/766/2/114

    S \'a nchez-Monge , \'A ., Kurtz , S., Palau , A., et al. 2013, , 766, 114, 10.1088/0004-637X/766/2/114

    2013 doi

  94. [105]

    M., & Hofner , P

    Sewilo , M., Churchwell , E., Kurtz , S., Goss , W. M., & Hofner , P. 2004, , 605, 285, 10.1086/382268

    2004 doi

  95. [106]

    2016, , 68, L7, 10.1093/pasj/psw031

    Tsuboi , M., Kitamura , Y., Miyoshi , M., et al. 2016, , 68, L7, 10.1093/pasj/psw031

    2016 doi

  96. [107]

    2017, , 842, 94, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa74e3

    Tsuboi , M., Kitamura , Y., Uehara , K., et al. 2017, , 842, 94, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa74e3

    2017 doi

  97. [108]

    D., Getman , K

    Tsujimoto , M., Hosokawa , T., Feigelson , E. D., Getman , K. V., & Broos , P. S. 2006, , 653, 409, 10.1086/507439

    2006 doi

  98. [109]

    van der Walt , D. J. 2014, , 562, A68, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322512

    2014 doi

  99. [110]

    L., Longmore , S

    Walker , D. L., Longmore , S. N., Bastian , N., et al. 2015, , 449, 715, 10.1093/mnras/stv300

    2015 doi

  100. [111]

    L., Longmore , S

    Walker , D. L., Longmore , S. N., Zhang , Q., et al. 2018, , 474, 2373, 10.1093/mnras/stx2898

    2018 doi

  101. [112]

    J., Breen , S

    Walsh , A. J., Breen , S. L., Britton , T., et al. 2011, , 416, 1764, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19115.x

    2011

  102. [113]

    D., Dong , H., Cotera , A., et al

    Wang , Q. D., Dong , H., Cotera , A., et al. 2010, , 402, 895, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15973.x

    2010

  103. [114]

    2018, , 619, A124, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833642

    Wang , Y., Bihr , S., Rugel , M., et al. 2018, , 619, A124, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833642

    2018 doi

  104. [115]

    J., Hachisuka , K., et al

    Xu , Y., Li , J. J., Hachisuka , K., et al. 2008, , 485, 729, 10.1051/0004-6361:200809472

    2008 doi

  105. [116]

    W., & Cotton , W

    Yusef-Zadeh , F., Hewitt , J. W., & Cotton , W. 2004, , 155, 421, 10.1086/425257

    2004 doi

  106. [117]

    H., Wardle , M., et al

    Yusef-Zadeh , F., Lacy , J. H., Wardle , M., et al. 2010, , 725, 1429, 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/1429

    2010 doi

  107. [118]

    1987 a , , 94, 1178, 10.1086/114555

    Yusef-Zadeh , F., & Morris , M. 1987 a , , 94, 1178, 10.1086/114555

    1987 doi

  108. [119]

    1987 b , , 320, 545, 10.1086/165572

    ---. 1987 b , , 320, 545, 10.1086/165572

    1987 doi

  109. [120]

    1984, , 310, 557, 10.1038/310557a0

    Yusef-Zadeh , F., Morris , M., & Chance , D. 1984, , 310, 557, 10.1038/310557a0

    1984 doi

  110. [121]

    W., Arendt , R

    Yusef-Zadeh , F., Hewitt , J. W., Arendt , R. G., et al. 2009, , 702, 178, 10.1088/0004-637X/702/1/178

    2009 doi

  111. [122]

    R., & Goss , W

    Zhao , J.-H., Morris , M. R., & Goss , W. M. 2013, , 777, 146, 10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/146

    2013 doi

  112. [123]

    2016, , 817, 171, 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/171

    ---. 2016, , 817, 171, 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/171

    2016 doi

  113. [124]

    R., Goss , W

    Zhao , J.-H., Morris , M. R., Goss , W. M., & An , T. 2009, , 699, 186, 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/186

    2009 doi

  114. [125]

    Zhao , J.-H., & Wright , M. C. H. 2011, , 742, 50, 10.1088/0004-637X/742/1/50

    2011 doi

  115. [126]

    Zhu , Z., Li , Z., & Morris , M. R. 2018, , 235, 26, 10.3847/1538-4365/aab14f

    2018 doi

  116. [127]

    J., Becker , R

    Zoonematkermani , S., Helfand , D. J., Becker , R. H., White , R. L., & Perley , R. A. 1990, , 74, 181, 10.1086/191496

    1990 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.