Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 70 references

Evaporative cooling to a Rydberg crystal close to its ground state

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that an evaporative cooling scheme acting on the collective phonon modes of a one-dimensional chain of circular Rydberg atoms can drive the chain close to its quantum ground state, yielding a long crystal with true…

desk verdict The paper is a plausible and clearly presented thermodynamic proposal whose classical branch checks out, but the quantum near-ground-state headline rests on an unquantified ergodicity assumption and should be conditioned on a thermalization rate or small quantum simulation. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.02367 v2 pith:D56TQJVZ submitted 2019-09-05 cond-mat.quant-gas

Michel Brune , David Papoular This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords evaporativecoolingRydbergatomscircularstatesone-dimensionalcrystalquantumgroundstatetruncatedBoltzmanndistributionlong-rangeordercollectivephononmodes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a one-dimensional chain of circular Rydberg atoms, held together by strong van der Waals repulsion, can be cooled evaporatively to a crystalline state very close to its quantum ground state. The cooling works by slowly compressing the chain inside an asymmetric trap, expelling atoms one by one through the lower barrier and carrying away energy. The authors model the chain's thermal state with a truncated Boltzmann distribution over its collective phonon modes, which produces a quasi-equilibrium state distinct from the truncated Bose-Einstein distribution of dilute gases. For realistic parameters starting from 1000 atoms, they find a final crystal of about 764 atoms with energy $U_F/(N_F h)=8.5$ kHz, only about 2 kHz above the zero-point energy of 6.6 kHz, and with all spatial correlators much smaller than the squared mean spacing, i.e. true long-range order. The scheme matters because such long one-dimensional crystals have so far been inaccessible, and the paper argues they become reachable deep in the quantum regime.

What carries the argument

The key object is the truncated Boltzmann distribution over the chain's collective phonon modes. The chain is described by a quadratic Hamiltonian in normal modes with frequencies $\omega_1<\dots<\omega_N$, and the asymmetric trap defines an escape threshold energy $E_M$: the smallest energy at which the leftmost atom's displacement reaches the trap edge. The partition function is proportional to the normalized lower incomplete gamma function $P(N,\beta E_M)$, with a leading $\hbar^2$ quantum correction, and the cutoff is imposed on the total configuration energy rather than on individual mode populations. Because this prevents the partition function from factorizing, the resulting quasi-equilibrium differs qualitatively from a truncated Bose-Einstein distribution, and it is this object that predicts the energy and entropy curves used to construct the evaporation sequence.

What would settle it

Compress a Rydberg chain at a rate faster than the anharmonic thermalization timescale and compare the final energy and spatial correlations with the predicted $U_F$ and long-range order; if the energy stays well above the zero-point level and the correlators remain large, the ergodicity assumption fails. A numerical simulation of the full anharmonic dynamics, or of the harmonic dynamics alone, would show whether the evaporation curve departs from the truncated-Boltzmann prediction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that evaporative cooling of a Rydberg-atom chain is driven by the collective phonons, not by two-body collisions: when the trap is compressed, the lowest-energy untrapped configurations are those in which the leftmost atom reaches the barrier edge, and ergodic exploration of the truncated energy shell expels it. The trapped configurations are described by a truncated Boltzmann distribution whose partition function does not factorize over modes, because the cutoff applies to the total phonon energy; this is a new quasi-equilibrium many-body state rather than a truncated Bose-Einstein condensate. In the quantum regime the final energy approaches the zero-point energy: for $N_I=1000$ atoms with initial spacing 5.5 μm, the predicted final chain has $N_F=764$ atoms and $U_F/(N_F h)=8.5$ kHz, close to $E_{ZP}/(N_F h)=6.6$ kHz, with long-range order in the spatial correlators.

Load-bearing premise

The scheme assumes that the anharmonic terms omitted from the harmonic model thermalize the chain quickly enough that the truncated Boltzmann distribution remains valid throughout compression and expulsion.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A realistic 1000-atom Rydberg chain can be cooled to within about 2 kHz per atom of its zero-point energy, yielding a one-dimensional crystal with true long-range order and no external periodic potential.
  • The final temperature is set by the maximum energy per particle the trap can hold, not by the barrier height, so it can be three orders of magnitude lower than the trap barriers.
  • For long chains the evaporation curve becomes quasi-universal: energy and entropy per particle follow universal curves $u_{\max}(l)$ and $s_{\max}(l)$ with deviations of order $1/N$.
  • The same evaporative principle should transfer to other one-dimensional systems with long-ranged repulsive interactions, such as polar molecules with dipole-dipole $1/r^3$ interactions.
  • The crystalline order of the final state can be characterized experimentally by microwave spectroscopy combined with ground-state imaging.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The predicted near-zero-point final state implies a strongly nonthermal phonon population; measuring phonon-number distributions through sideband or microwave spectroscopy would provide a direct test of the truncated-Boltzmann description.
  • Because quasi-universality ties the evaporation curve to the mean spacing alone, initial-number fluctuations should be a minor uncertainty for long chains, whereas initial-energy fluctuations dominate the scatter; this is a testable prediction about which experimental noise source matters.
  • If anharmonic thermalization is slower than the compression, the chain should fail to reach the predicted ground state and instead retain higher-energy, partially ordered configurations, offering an unambiguous experimental falsification.
  • The same non-factorizing truncated equilibrium may arise in other long-ranged one-dimensional systems, such as ion chains or dipolar gases, where the escape threshold is set by different edge physics but the collective truncation mechanism is unchanged.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents a theoretical model for evaporative cooling of a one-dimensional chain of circular Rydberg atoms confined in a box trap with unequal barrier heights. The atoms interact via a repulsive C6/r^6 van der Waals interaction, and the collective excitations are treated as harmonic phonons. The authors introduce a truncated Boltzmann distribution in which only configurations with energy below the threshold for the leftmost atom to escape are retained, derive the associated classical and quantum thermodynamics, and iterate adiabatic compressions and single-atom expulsions to compute evaporation curves. For an initial chain of 1000 atoms at kBTI/h = 65 kHz and spacing 5.5 µm, they predict a final state of 764 atoms with quadratic energy UF/(NF h) = 8.5 kHz, close to the zero-point energy 6.6 kHz, with positional correlators well below the squared spacing, i.e., a large near-ground-state Rydberg crystal. For an initial chain of 100 atoms they find a final state of 40 atoms at 7.0 kHz versus a zero-point energy of 5.9 kHz. The paper also emphasizes a quasi-universal evaporation curve for long chains.

Significance. If the central assumption of quantum ergodicity is granted, the result is significant: it proposes a concrete route to 1D crystals of hundreds of atoms deep in the quantum regime without a periodic potential, and it identifies a truncated quasi-equilibrium phonon ensemble that is genuinely different from the truncated Bose-Einstein distribution familiar from ultracold gases. The classical branch of the model is transparent and agrees with the classical dynamics simulations of Ref. [2], which is independent support. The final energies are not obtained by fitting: they follow from physical parameters and the threshold condition, so the predictions are falsifiable. The main limitation is that the quantum regime relies on an unquantified assumption of ergodicity due to anharmonic terms.

major comments (1)
  1. [Quantum thermodynamics (before Eq. (4)); Supplemental Sec. II; Outlook (iii)] The central quantitative prediction of the paper, in particular the final state of 764 atoms at UF/(NF h) = 8.5 kHz, rests on the assumption, stated immediately before Eq. (4), that anharmonic processes neglected in Eq. (1) thermalize the chain so that a truncated Boltzmann distribution over harmonic Fock states describes the quasi-equilibrium at every stage. No quantitative support is provided for this assumption in the quantum regime. Supplemental Sec. II states only that anharmonic terms 'are responsible for thermalization and ergodicity on a timescale involving τpropag' and invokes the classical N=100 dynamics of Ref. [2] at 40 µm/ms, while the near-final chain (kBTF/h = 4 kHz, Fig. S1) is close to an integrable harmonic system in which phonon-phonon scattering is expected to be strongly suppressed. Without an estimate of the anharmonic relaxation rate (from the cubic and quartic terms shown in Fig. S2) compared with the compression rate, or a small-scale quantum dynamics simulation, the entropy-conservation step and Eq. (5) lose their stated basis. The paper itself flags this gap in Outlook item (iii), but because it is load-bearing for the main claim, it should be addressed rather than deferred.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Eq. (2) in the main text] The definition of P(a,z) in Eq. (2) has the denominator Γ(N), but it should be Γ(a), as correctly given in Eq. (S1).
  2. [Supplemental Eq. (S1)] Eq. (S1) has the integration limits and exponents of the incomplete gamma function wrong: it should read γ(a,z) = ∫_0^z dt e^{-t} t^{a-1}.
  3. [Fig. 5 caption] The caption of Fig. 5(a) repeats 'Smax(L/N)/N' twice; the second occurrence should be 'Umax(L/N)/N'.
  4. [Main text final paragraph; Fig. S1(c)] The phrase 'true long-range order' used for the final 764-atom chain should be qualified as finite-size order, since the correlator data of Fig. S1(c) concern a single finite system and do not by themselves establish the thermodynamic limit; a scaling analysis or a more cautious wording would avoid overclaiming.
  5. [References and Supplemental Sec. V] The reference list contains duplicate numbering (two entries labeled [1], [2], [3], [4], and [5] appear at different positions), and the Supplemental text refers to a section as 'Sec. .' with the number missing; these should be corrected in the final version.
  6. [Classical thermodynamics, after Eq. (2)] The only dynamical evidence for classical ergodicity is cited as a private communication (Ref. [59]); for reproducibility, the authors should either make those simulations available or replace the citation with the published data of Ref. [2].

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the final near-ground-state energies are outputs of a thermodynamic model, not fitted targets.

full rationale

The paper's derivation is self-contained. Physical parameters (trap geometry, C6, barrier heights) are taken from Ref. [2], but the final energies UF/(NF h) = 7.0 kHz (N=40) and 8.5 kHz (N=764) are outputs of the truncated-Boltzmann thermodynamic calculation, not quantities used to tune any parameter. The threshold alpha = 1/sqrt(2) is a stated modeling choice carried over from the classical escape condition, not a hidden fit to the ground-state result. The classical branch is checked against the classical-dynamics simulations of Ref. [2], which are independent numerical evidence rather than an imported conclusion. The quantum regime explicitly assumes ergodicity, and the paper itself flags in the Outlook that 'the timescale ensuring adiabaticity is set by the anharmonic processes neglected in Eq. (1)'; this is an acknowledged assumption and a correctness risk, not a circular reduction, because no derived claim is defined in terms of the target result. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no known result is repackaged as new. The central claim is therefore not equivalent to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result rests on a harmonic description of the chain, an ergodicity assumption, a truncated Boltzmann equilibrium over phonon configurations, and an adiabatic evaporation sequence. It introduces one hand-chosen threshold parameter alpha, no new physical entities, and no fitted constants: the interaction strength, barrier heights, and trap parameters are taken from the existing circular Rydberg atom platform of Ref. [2].

free parameters (1)
  • Evaporation threshold parameter alpha = alpha = 1/sqrt(2)
    Chosen by hand, not derived or fitted. It defines the escape condition sqrt(<u1^2>) = alpha uM, sets the threshold energies E_M^cl and E_M^quant, and therefore controls where each atom is expelled and the final energy of the chain.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Quadratic harmonic Hamiltonian (Eq. 1) remains valid throughout evaporation, i.e. the chain keeps local order with eta_n < 1.
    Supplemental Sec. I shows the harmonicity criterion is satisfied for the long chain, but the entire evaporation curve assumes the chain never melts into a liquid or loses local ordering.
  • domain assumption Quantum and classical ergodicity: the chain explores all configurations with total energy below the escape threshold E_M.
    Used to justify treating trapped configurations as E < E_M and to build the truncated Boltzmann partition function. For the classical case it is motivated by chaotic simulations in Ref. [59]; for the quantum case it is simply assumed.
  • domain assumption The truncated Boltzmann distribution over collective phonon modes describes the quasi-equilibrium state.
    This is the central statistical model, introduced in Eq. (2) for the classical case and extended to the quantum partition function Z_quant; it is not derived from microscopic dynamics.
  • domain assumption Each atomic expulsion removes kinetic energy VL and the remaining atoms fully thermalize to a new truncated equilibrium (Eq. 5).
    This energy balance drives the evaporation curve. Rare non-thermalized expulsions are discussed in Supplemental Sec. II but are not included in the model.
  • domain assumption Compression is adiabatic (constant entropy) and slow enough that anharmonic processes thermalize the chain between expulsions.
    Used to connect successive plateau states. The adiabatic timescale is set by anharmonic processes neglected in Eq. (1), with only classical evidence from Ref. [S2].
  • domain assumption E_M^quant >> E_ZP + hbar omega_N for all reported parameters, so that E_M^quant is approximately E_M^cl + E_ZP.
    Used to evaluate the quantum partition function. The authors stop the evaporation at l = 4.4 micrometers, where this condition is only marginally satisfied.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Evaporative cooling to a Rydberg crystal close to its ground state." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/D56TQJVZ

@misc{pith2026190902367,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Evaporative cooling to a Rydberg crystal close to its ground state},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/D56TQJVZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.02367}
}
read the original abstract

We theoretically show how to obtain a long one-dimensional crystal near its quantum ground state. We rely on an evaporative cooling scheme applicable to many-body systems with nonzero-ranged interactions. Despite the absence of periodic potentials, the final state is a crystal which exhibits long-range spatial order. We describe the scheme thermodynamically, applying the truncated Boltzmann distribution to the collective excitations of the chain, and show that it leads to a novel quasi-equilibrium many-body state. For longer chains, comprising about 1000 atoms, we emphasize the quasi-universality of the evaporation curve. Such exceptionally long 1D crystals are only accessible deep in the quantum regime. We perform our analysis on the example of an initially thermal chain of circular Rydberg atoms confined to a one-dimensional (1D) geometry. Our scheme may be applied to other quantum systems with long-ranged interactions such as polar molecules.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.02367 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. A Rydberg atom chain (orange) confined in a 1D trap [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The first few expulsions for a chain with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Quasi–universal evaporation of a chain with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [2]

    C. C. Grimes and G. Adams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 795 (1979)

    work page 1979

  2. [1]

    Wigner, Phys

    E. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 46, 1002 (1934)

    1934

  3. [3]

    J. G. Bohnet, B. C. Sawyer, J. W. Britton, M. L. Wall, A. M. Rey, M. Foss-Feig, and J. J. Bollinger, Science 352, 1297 (2016)

    2016

  4. [4]

    Jordan, K

    E. Jordan, K. A. Gilmore, A. Shankar, A. Safavi-Naini, J. G. Bohnet, M. J. Holland, and J. J. Bollinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 053603 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    R. A. Guyer, Solid State Physics 23, 412 (1969)

    work page 1969

  6. [6]

    E. B. Sonin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 87 (1987)

    work page 1987

  7. [7]

    Coddington, P

    I. Coddington, P. Engels, V. Schweikhard, and E. A. Cor- nell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 100402 (2003)

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Haziot, X

    A. Haziot, X. Rojas, A. D. Fefferman, J. R. Beamish, and S. Balibar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 035301 (2013)

    work page 2013

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    J. Li, , J. Lee, W. Huang, S. Burchevsky, B. Shteynas, F. C. Top, A. O. Jamison, and W. Ketterle, Nature 543, 91 (2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    L´ eonard, A

    J. L´ eonard, A. Morales, P. Zupancic, T. Esslinger, and T. Donner, Nature 543, 87 (2017)

    2017

  3. [11]

    Furthermore, numerical simulations of the classical (cl) dynamics of the atom chain [59] have shown the atomic motion to be chaotic

    is set by ω1. Furthermore, numerical simulations of the classical (cl) dynamics of the atom chain [59] have shown the atomic motion to be chaotic. Hence, exploiting ergodicity, the trapped configurations are those with E < E cl M . We describe the quasi–equilibrium thermodynami...

  4. [12]

    Tanzi, E

    L. Tanzi, E. Lucioni, F. Fam` a, J. Catani, A. Fioretti, C. Gabbanini, R. N. Bisset, L. Santos, and G. Modugno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 130405 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    B¨ ottcher, J

    F. B¨ ottcher, J. N. Schmidt, M. Wenzel, J. Hertkorn, M. Guo, T. Langen, and T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. X 9, 011051 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    Chomaz, D

    L. Chomaz, D. Petter, P. Ilzh¨ ofer, G. Natale, A. Traut- mann, C. Politi, G. Durastante, R. M. W. van Bijnen, A. Patscheider, M. Sohmen, M. J. Mark, and F. Ferlaino, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021012 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    N. D. Mermin, Phys. Rev. 176, 250 (1968)

    1968

  8. [16]

    One-dimensional effective Wigner crystal in quantum and classical regimes,

    D. Vu and S. Das Sarma, “One-dimensional effective Wigner crystal in quantum and classical regimes,” (2018)

    2018

  9. [17]

    Jurcevic, B

    P. Jurcevic, B. P. Lanyon, P. Hauke, C. Hempel, P. Zoller , R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Nature 511, 202 (2014)

    2014

  10. [18]

    Richerme, Z

    P. Richerme, Z. Gong, A. Lee, C. Senko, J. Smith, M. Foss-Feig, S. Michalakis, A. V. Gorshkov, and C. Mon- roe, Nature 511, 198 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    Senko, J

    C. Senko, J. Smith, P. Richerme, A. Lee, W. C. Camp- bell, and C. Monroe, Science 345, 430 (430)

  12. [20]

    Lechner, C

    R. Lechner, C. Maier, C. Hempel, P. Jurcevic, B. P. Lanyon, T. Monz, M. Brownnutt, R. Blatt, and C. F. Roos, Phys. Rev. A 93, 053401 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    V. V. Deshpande and M. Bockrath, Nature 4, 314 (2008)

    2008

  14. [22]

    Shapir, A

    I. Shapir, A. Hamo, S. Pecker, C. P. Moca, O. Legeza, G. Zarand, and S. Ilani, Science 364, 870 (2019)

    2019

  15. [23]

    Balibar, J

    S. Balibar, J. Beamish, A. Fefferman, A. Haziot, X. Ro- jas, and F. Souris, C. R. Phys. 17, 264 (2016)

    2016

  16. [24]

    H. L. Partner, R. Nigmatullin, T. Burgermeister, J. Keller, K. Pyka, M. B. Plenio, A. Retzker, W. H. Zurek, A. del Campo, and T. E. Mehlst¨ aubler, Physica B 460, 114 (2015)

    2015

  17. [25]

    Kleppner, M

    D. Kleppner, M. G. Littman, and M. L. Zimmerman, Sci. Am. 244, 130 (1981)

    1981

  18. [26]

    Saffman, T

    M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2313 (2010)

    2010

  19. [27]

    Y. Zeng, P. Xu, X. He, Y. Liu, M. Liu, J. Wang, D. J. Papoular, G. V. Shlyapnikov, and M. Zhan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 160502 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    T. L. Nguyen, J. M. Raimond, C. Sayrin, R. Cortinas, T. Cantat-Moltrecht, F. Assemat, I. Dotsenko, S. Gleyzes, S. Haroche, G. Roux, T. Jolicoeur, and M. Brune, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011032 (2018)

    2018

  21. [29]

    Weimer, M

    H. Weimer, M. M¨ uller, I. Lesanovsky, P. Zoller, and H. P. B¨ uchler, Nat. Phys.6, 382 (2010)

    2010

  22. [30]

    T. Pohl, E. Demler, and M. D. Lukin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 043002 (2010)

    2010

  23. [31]

    Schauss, M

    P. Schauss, M. Cheneau, M. Endres, T. Fukuhura, S. Hild, A. Omran, T. Pohl, C. Gross, S. Kuhr, and I. Bloch, Nature 491, 87 (2012)

    2012

  24. [32]

    Schauss, J

    P. Schauss, J. Zeiher, T. Fukuhara, S. Hild, M. Cheneau, T. Macri, T. Pohl, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Science 347, 1455 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Om- ran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuletic, and M. D. Lukin, Nature 551, 579 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    Barredo, V

    D. Barredo, V. Lienhard, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Nature 561, 79 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    Labuhn, D

    H. Labuhn, D. Barredo, S. Ravets, S. de Leseleuc, T. Macri, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Nature 534, 667 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    de L´ es´ eleuc, V

    S. de L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, S.We- ber, N. Lang, H. P. B¨ uchler, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Science 365, 775 (2019)

    2019

  29. [37]

    Pupillo, A

    G. Pupillo, A. Micheli, M. Boninsegni, I. Lesanovsky, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 223002 (2010)

    2010

  30. [38]

    Y. Jau, A. M. Hankin, T. Keating, I. H. Deutsch, and G. W. Biedermann, Nat. Phys. 12, 71 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    Zeiher, R

    J. Zeiher, R. van Bijnen, P. Schauss, S. Hild, J. Choi, T. Pohl, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Nat. Phys. 12, 1095 (2016)

    2016

  32. [40]

    L¨ ow, H

    R. L¨ ow, H. Weimer, J. Nipper, J. B. Balewski, B. Butscher, H. P. B¨ uchler, and T. Pfau, J. Phys. B 45, 113001 (2012)

    2012

  33. [41]

    A. W. Glaetzle, M. Dalmonte, R. Nath, I. Rousochatza- kis, R. Moessner, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. X 4, 041037 (2014)

    2014

  34. [42]

    Weimer, R

    H. Weimer, R. L¨ ow, T. Pfau, and H. P. B¨ uchler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 250601 (2008)

    2008

  35. [43]

    L¨ ow, H

    R. L¨ ow, H. Weimer, U. Krohn, R. Heidemann, V. Bend- kowsky, B. Butscher, H. P. B¨ uchler, and T. Pfau, Phys. Rev. A 80, 033422 (2009)

    2009

  36. [44]

    R. G. Hulet and D. Kleppner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1430 (1983)

    1983

  37. [45]

    D. A. Anderson, A. Schwarzkopf, R. E. Sapiro, and G. Raithel, Phys. Rev. A 88, 031401(R) (2013)

    2013

  38. [46]

    Zhelyazkova and S

    V. Zhelyazkova and S. D. Hogan, Phys. Rev. A 94, 023415 (2016)

    2016

  39. [47]

    Signoles, E

    A. Signoles, E. K. Dietsche, A. Facon, D. Grosso, S. Haroche, J. M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Gleyzes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 253603 (2017)

    2017

  40. [48]

    Kleppner, Phys

    D. Kleppner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 233 (1981)

    1981

  41. [49]

    R. G. Hulet, E. S. Hilfer, and D. Kleppner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2137 (1985). 6

    1985

  42. [50]

    R. G. Corti˜ nas, M. Favier, B. Ravon, P. M´ ehaignerie, Y. Machu, J. M. Raimond, C. Sayrin, and M. Brune, arXiv:1911.02316 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Yamashita, M

    M. Yamashita, M. Koashi, and N. Imoto, Phys. Rev. A 59, 2243 (1999)

    1999

  44. [52]

    O. J. Luiten, M. W. Reynolds, and J. T. M. Walraven, Phys. Rev. A 53, 381 (1996)

    1996

  45. [53]

    W. D. Johnston Jr. and J. G. King, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, 1191 (1966)

    1966

  46. [54]

    P. W. Anderson, Phys. Lett. 29A, 563 (1968)

    1968

  47. [55]

    Dalfovo, A

    F. Dalfovo, A. Fracchetti, A. Lastri, L. Pitaevskii, an d S. Stringari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2510 (1995)

    1995

  48. [56]

    D. J. Papoular, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, Phys . Rev. A 94, 023622 (2016)

    2016

  49. [57]

    S. K. Dutta, J. R. Guest, D. Feldbaum, A. Walz- Flannigan, and G. Raithel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5551 (2000)

    2000

  50. [58]

    Allen, S

    L. Allen, S. M. Barnett, and M. J. Padgett, Optical an- gular momentum (Institute of Physics Publishing, 2003)

    2003

  51. [59]

    See supplemental mate- rial at [url will be inserted by publisher]

    M. Brune and D. J. Papoular, “See supplemental mate- rial at [url will be inserted by publisher].” (2019)

    2019

  52. [60]

    Numerical simulations of the classical dynamics of a trapped Rydberg chain,

    M. Brune and J. M. Raimond, “Numerical simulations of the classical dynamics of a trapped Rydberg chain,” (2017), private communication

    2017

  53. [61]

    NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions ,

    DLMF, “ NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions ,” http://dlmf.nist.gov/ (2018)

    2018

  54. [62]

    J. T. M. Walraven, in Quantum dynamics of simple sys- tems (IOP Bristol, 1996)

    1996

  55. [63]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Statistical Physics, part 1, 3rd ed. (Elsevier, 1980)

    1980

  56. [64]

    Birkl, S

    G. Birkl, S. Kassner, and H. Walther, Nature 357, 310 (1992)

    1992

  57. [65]

    Ikegami, H

    H. Ikegami, H. Akimoto, D. G. Rees, and K. Kono, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 236802 (2012)

    2012

  58. [66]

    Barredo, S

    D. Barredo, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Science 354, 1021 (2016)

    2016

  59. [67]

    De Marco, G

    L. De Marco, G. Valtolina, K. Matsuda, W. G. Tobias, J. P. Covey, and J. Ye, Science 363, 853 (2019)

    2019

  60. [68]

    Anderegg, L

    L. Anderegg, L. W. Cheuk, Y. Bao, S. Burchesky, W. Ketterle, K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Science 365, 1156 (2019)

    2019

  61. [69]

    M. A. Baranov, M. Dalmonte, G. Pupillo, and P. Zoller, Chem. Rev. 112, 5012 (2012). 1 Supplemental material This document provides complementary information on the following topics: I. the applicability of the quadratic Hamiltonian; II. the anharmonic terms and their twofold r...

    2012

  62. [1000]

    NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions ,

    In order to capture the steep variation of these functions for z ∼ a, we resort to arbitrary–precision nu- merics using the Boost.Multiprecision C++ library [S6]. CONSTANT ATOM NUMBER PLATEAUX Between two atomic expulsions, the chain undergoes an adiabatic compression during w...

    1968

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.