A review of Approximate Bayesian Computation methods via density estimation: inference for simulator-models

Clara Grazian; Yanan Fan

REVIEW 2 major objections 3 minor 71 references

A review of Approximate Bayesian Computation methods via density estimation: inference for simulator-models

T0 review · 2 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review argues that ABC methods which approximate the likelihood directly through density estimation can be considerably more efficient than rejection-based ABC, and that machine-learning density estimators are the likely route to…

desk verdict Useful, clearly written ABC review organized around density estimation, but the efficiency claim outruns the uncontrolled comparisons and the advertised ML direction is untested. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.02736 v1 pith:RIGYVHFG submitted 2019-09-06 stat.CO stat.ME

Clara Grazian , Yanan Fan This is my paper · ORCID

classification stat.COstat.ME MSC 62F1562G0762-02

keywords approximateBayesiancomputationlikelihood-freeinferencedensityestimationsyntheticlikelihoodconditionalneuralestimatorsBOLFIsimulator-basedmodels

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) lets researchers do Bayesian inference when the likelihood is unavailable but data can be simulated from the model. This review organizes ABC methods around a single idea: instead of accepting or rejecting parameter values by comparing simulated and observed summary statistics, estimate the conditional density that defines the likelihood. The paper argues that direct likelihood approximation avoids the inefficiency of discrepancy minimization, with parametric methods such as synthetic likelihood and nonparametric Gaussian-process methods such as BOLFI as intermediate steps, and that neural conditional density estimators have the potential to scale ABC to higher dimensions. The value of the review is practical: it gives a map for choosing among likelihood-approximation methods and points to where the field is heading.

What carries the argument

The central object is the approximate likelihood $L(\theta)\approx p(\eta_0|\theta)$, the conditional density of chosen summary statistics given the parameter. Synthetic likelihood estimates this density with a Gaussian whose mean and covariance come from simulated summary statistics. Kernel and Gaussian-process approaches, including BOLFI (Bayesian optimization for likelihood-free inference), model the discrepancy measure and convert the probability that it falls below a tolerance into a likelihood approximation. Neural conditional density estimators train a flexible parametric model on simulated $(\theta,\eta)$ pairs to approximate the same conditional density. For the Gaussian example the paper makes the connection explicit: with a squared-error discrepancy, the approximation from accepted samples is proportional to $\sqrt{\varepsilon}\,L(\theta)$, so the tolerance $\varepsilon$ enters as a scaling factor rather than a binary filter.

What would settle it

Run the Gaussian and Ricker experiments across a grid of tolerance thresholds and summary-statistic sets, including at least one neural conditional density estimator; the central efficiency claim would be falsified if rejection ABC matched or beat every likelihood-approximation method in accuracy per simulation at every setting, or if the neural estimator's training cost outweighed its savings.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the various ABC algorithms can be viewed as density-estimation problems for the conditional distribution $p(\eta_0|\theta)$ of summary statistics given parameters, and that estimating this density directly is considerably more efficient than using a discrepancy threshold to filter simulations. The review assembles the synthetic likelihood, kernel and Gaussian-process approximations of the discrepancy, empirical likelihood, and neural conditional density estimators under this single lens. In its two simulation studies, the synthetic likelihood gives the best posterior approximation for Gaussian data with a sufficient summary statistic, while rejection ABC and BOLFI are better for the Ricker model when thirteen non-Gaussian summary statistics are used. The authors conclude that neural density estimators, though not implemented in their examples, are the most promising direction for making ABC scalable to higher dimensions and less dependent on user tuning.

Load-bearing premise

The practical guidance assumes that one pilot-run tolerance threshold and one set of summary statistics are representative for every algorithm compared, and that the neural density estimators recommended for the future would perform at least as well on those examples, a comparison the paper does not run.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

When summary statistics are close to Gaussian, synthetic likelihood can replace the tolerance-threshold trade-off and produce posterior approximations that track the true posterior closely.
In models with non-Gaussian or high-dimensional summary statistics, synthetic likelihood degrades, while rejection ABC and BOLFI remain competitive, so the right method depends on the summary-statistic regime.
BOLFI is most useful when the prior is diffuse or the high-posterior region is hard to locate, because it spends simulations learning the discrepancy surface instead of rejecting from uninformative regions.
Conditional density estimators separate training from inference: once trained on simulated pairs, the same approximate likelihood can be reused for multiple observed datasets from the same simulator.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The paper's forward-looking claim would be directly testable by adding a neural conditional density estimator to the Gaussian and Ricker benchmarks; the authors note these methods were not implemented, so the expected scalability gain is still an open empirical question.
The reported rankings—synthetic likelihood best for Gaussian data, rejection ABC and BOLFI better for the Ricker model with thirteen statistics—may be sensitive to the pilot-run tolerance cutoff; varying that cutoff would show which conclusions are robust.
Amortizing simulation cost is an implicit consequence of trained density estimators: expensive upfront training can be repaid when many datasets from the same model need inference, a cost model very different from single-dataset ABC.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick take: this is a useful review, not a methods paper. The density-estimation framing is a genuinely helpful way to organize ABC methods, and the authors describe synthetic likelihood, BOLFI, and neural density estimators accurately. They also ship code and repeat their simulations 250 times, which is more than most reviews bother with.

The best parts are the connections between seemingly different algorithms: treating rejection ABC as a kernel density estimate of the likelihood, BOLFI as a GP model of the discrepancy, and synthetic likelihood as a parametric shortcut. Section 4 covers Fan et al. (2013) and the recent neural likelihood/posterior estimators well. If you want one compact source to point students to, this is a reasonable choice.

The main weakness is that the paper makes a strong efficiency claim—direct likelihood approximation is 'considerably more efficient'—but the comparisons in Section 5 do not control the things that would establish that. The three algorithms run at very different simulator budgets (1000 draws for synthetic likelihood, 20,000 or 102,000 for rejection ABC, 4000 for BOLFI) and there is no cost-accuracy curve. The tolerance for ABC and BOLFI is set by a pilot run at the 0.05 quantile of simulated distances; the rankings could plausibly shift with a different tolerance. The paper itself states in Section 6 that the Section 4 ML methods were not implemented, so the advertised future direction is explicitly untested. There is also a minor slip in Eq. (4): the exponent of the Gaussian is missing the factor n, so the displayed synthetic likelihood is not dimensionally consistent with the sqrt(n/2pi) prefactor. None of this sinks the review, but it does mean the paper should be read as an illustrative comparison, not a benchmark.

The authors are honest about these limitations, and the Ricker example actually shows synthetic likelihood deteriorating with 13 summary statistics, which is a useful caution. For a review article, this is solid. It deserves a serious referee—revisions should ask for either cost-scaled comparisons or a softened efficiency claim, and a correct Eq. (4). I would probably not cite it in my own research work, but I'd happily hand it to a student getting started in ABC.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper is a review of Approximate Bayesian Computation methods organized around the idea of density estimation of the likelihood. It covers parametric synthetic likelihood, nonparametric and Gaussian-process based approaches (including BOLFI), and conditional density estimation with mixtures and neural networks. The authors argue that methods which directly approximate the likelihood L(θ) can be considerably more efficient than rejection-based ABC because they avoid discrepancy minimization, and they suggest that machine-learning density estimators are a promising direction for scaling ABC to higher dimensions. Two simulation studies (Gaussian data and the Ricker model) compare synthetic likelihood, rejection ABC, and BOLFI, with 250 repetitions and pointwise 95% variability intervals. The paper concludes that synthetic likelihood performs best when normality assumptions hold and that BOLFI is an intermediate solution, while also stating in Section 6 that the Section 4 machine-learning methods were not implemented.

Significance. As a review, the paper usefully synthesizes a substantial literature and makes a clear conceptual connection between ABC, density estimation, and machine-learning surrogate models. The reproducible simulation code, the repeated-experiment protocol, and the explicit pointwise variability intervals are strengths that increase confidence in the qualitative conclusion that normality assumptions matter. However, the central efficiency claim is only weakly supported by the empirical comparisons, and the most forward-looking part of the claim (neural density estimators as the future of ABC) is explicitly not demonstrated in the paper. If the authors temper these claims and add sensitivity analyses, the paper would be a solid review contribution for a broad statistical readership; in its current form the abstract overstates the evidence.

major comments (2)

[Section 5, Figures 1 and 3] The claim that likelihood-approximation methods are 'considerably more efficient' than rejection ABC is not quantitatively established because the three algorithms are not compared on a common footing. In Section 5.1, rejection ABC and BOLFI use a pilot-selected tolerance (0.05 quantile) while synthetic likelihood uses no tolerance; in Section 5.2, rejection ABC uses ε=5.0, with the only sensitivity check being a reported CPU time for ε=4.0 rather than an accuracy comparison. The simulator budgets also differ by more than an order of magnitude (1000 draws for synthetic likelihood versus 20,000 or 102,000 for rejection ABC and 4,000 for BOLFI). Without an accuracy-per-cost curve or a sensitivity analysis of the ranking to ε and to the simulation budget, the comparative efficiency conclusion is not supported by the reported experiments.
[Abstract, Section 1, Section 6] The forward-looking component of the central thesis is explicitly untested: Section 6 states 'we have not implemented the methods in Sections 4', yet the Abstract and Section 1 present machine-learning density estimators as having 'the potential to make ABC scalable to higher dimensions and may be the future direction for research in this area' and the Abstract claims to 'show advantages and limitations' of the reviewed classes. The belief about neural density estimators may be reasonable, but it is not a demonstrated result of this paper. The authors should either include at least one Section 4 method in the comparison or clearly label the machine-learning direction as a speculative research agenda and moderate the Abstract so that 'we show' applies only to the methods actually studied.

minor comments (3)

[Section 5.1, Eq. (4)] Equation (4) is missing the factor n in the exponent: for ηsim ∼ N(θ, 1/n), the synthetic likelihood for the sample mean should be proportional to exp{−n(η0−θ−g)^2/2}, not exp{−(η0−θ−g)^2/2}; the stated variance 1/(nN) for the estimator also depends on this n, so the formula as written is dimensionally inconsistent.
[Section 5.1, Eq. (5)] The displayed decomposition of Pr(Δ ≤ ε) is incorrect as written: Pr((η0−ηsim) ≥ √ε) + Pr((η0−ηsim) ≤ √ε) equals 1 for any continuous variable, whereas the subsequent CDF expression and the intended meaning require Pr(−√ε ≤ η0−ηsim ≤ √ε).
[Acknowledgements] The name 'Henri Personen' in the Acknowledgements appears to be a typo, likely for 'Henri Pesonen'; please verify the spelling.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: this is a review paper with no fitted-input predictions or self-citation chains that force its conclusions.

full rationale

This manuscript is a review of ABC methods organized around density estimation, not a paper that fits parameters and then 'predicts' them back. The central claims—that likelihood-approximation methods can be more efficient than discrepancy-based rejection ABC, and that machine-learning density estimators are a promising future direction—are presented as literature synthesis and qualitative assessment, not as derived consequences of the paper's own equations. The only quantitative comparisons in Section 5 are illustrative experiments comparing existing algorithms, and while the experimental setup is acknowledged to be limited (pilot-chosen tolerances, unequal CPU budgets, and no implementation of Section 4 methods), this is a limitation of evidence quality rather than circular reasoning. Self-citations such as Fan et al. (2013), Sisson and Fan (2018), and Sisson et al. (2018b) are cited as prior published work with independent content; they are not invoked as an unverified uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification for the paper's organizational claims. The apparent normalization issue in Eq. (4) is a technical correctness concern, not a circularity. No load-bearing reduction of a claimed result to its own input was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new parameters are fitted to data in support of a new claim. The listed items are assumptions of the ABC framework and of specific methods described in the review. The only hand-chosen setting that materially affects the paper's illustrative comparisons is the ABC tolerance threshold.

free parameters (1)

ABC tolerance threshold ε = 0.05 quantile of pilot-run distances; 5.0 for Ricker example
Chosen by a pilot run in both examples (Section 5). The reported performance ranking of rejection ABC and BOLFI depends on this choice; no sensitivity analysis is reported.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption The generative model can produce exact pseudo-observations ysim ~ p(y|θ) for any θ.
Section 1 defines ABC by this requirement; the entire review and all methods described assume it.
domain assumption Summary statistics η(y) capture enough information about θ for reliable inference.
Section 1 notes information is lost unless statistics are sufficient, yet all reviewed methods work through summary statistics; the examples rely on the chosen sets of 5 and 13 statistics.
domain assumption For synthetic likelihood, the distribution of summary statistics is approximately Gaussian.
Section 2, equation (2); the review's example conclusions about synthetic likelihood depend on this approximation.
domain assumption For BOLFI, the discrepancy measure is well modeled as a Gaussian process with constant or heteroskedastic variance.
Section 3 describes BOLFI under these GP assumptions; the review's assessment of BOLFI inherits this modeling assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A review of Approximate Bayesian Computation methods via density estimation: inference for simulator-models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RIGYVHFG

@misc{pith2026190902736,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A review of Approximate Bayesian Computation methods via density estimation: inference for simulator-models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RIGYVHFG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.02736}
}

read the original abstract

This paper provides a review of Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) methods for carrying out Bayesian posterior inference, through the lens of density estimation. We describe several recent algorithms and make connection with traditional approaches. We show advantages and limitations of models based on parametric approaches and we then draw attention to developments in machine learning, which we believe have the potential to make ABC scalable to higher dimensions and may be the future direction for research in this area.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.02736 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** An example of simulated data from the Ricker model with log [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Approximations of the posterior distributions of log( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

[1]

, Beaumont, M A

aeschbacher2012novel APACrefauthors Aeschbacher, S. , Beaumont, M A. \ Futschik, A. APACrefauthors \ 2012 . A novel approach for choosing summary statistics in approximate B ayesian computation A novel approach for choosing summary statistics in approximate B ayesian computation . Genetics 192 3 1027--1047

work page 2012
[2]

, Charnock, T

alsing19 APACrefauthors Alsing, J. , Charnock, T. , Feeney, S. \ Wandelt, B. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Fast likelihood-free cosmology with neural density estimators and active learning Fast likelihood-free cosmology with neural density estimators and active learning . arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.00007v1

arXiv 2019
[3]

Robust Bayesian Synthetic Likelihood via a Semi-Parametric Approach

an2018robust APACrefauthors An, Z. , Nott, D J. \ Drovandi, C. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Robust Bayesian synthetic likelihood via a semi-parametric approach Robust bayesian synthetic likelihood via a semi-parametric approach . arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.05800

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[4]

APACrefauthors \ 2010

beaumont2010approximate APACrefauthors Beaumont, M A. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . Approximate B ayesian computation in evolution and ecology Approximate B ayesian computation in evolution and ecology . Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics 41 379--406

work page 2010
[5]

, Zhang, W

beaumont2002approximate APACrefauthors Beaumont, M A. , Zhang, W. \ Balding, D J. APACrefauthors \ 2002 . Approximate B ayesian computation in population genetics Approximate B ayesian computation in population genetics . Genetics 162 4 2025--2035

work page 2002
[6]

APACrefauthors \ 2010

blum2010approximateblum APACrefauthors Blum, M G. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . Approximate B ayesian computation: A nonparametric perspective Approximate B ayesian computation: A nonparametric perspective . Journal of the American Statistical Association 105 491 1178--1187

work page 2010
[7]

Regression approaches for Approximate Bayesian Computation

blum2017regression APACrefauthors Blum, M G. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Regression approaches for approximate B ayesian computation Regression approaches for approximate B ayesian computation . arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.01254

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[8]

\ Fran c ois, O

blum2010non APACrefauthors Blum, M G. \ Fran c ois, O. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . Non-linear regression models for A pproximate B ayesian C omputation Non-linear regression models for A pproximate B ayesian C omputation . Statistics and Computing 20 1 63--73

work page 2010

Show all 71 references

[9]

, Nunes, M A

blum2013comparative APACrefauthors Blum, M G. , Nunes, M A. , Prangle, D. \ Sisson, S A. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . A comparative review of dimension reduction methods in approximate B ayesian computation A comparative review of dimension reduction methods in approximate B ayesia...

2013
[10]

, You, L

bonassi+yw11 APACrefauthors Bonassi, F V. , You, L. \ West, M. APACrefauthors \ 2011 . Bayesian Learning from Marginal Data in Bionetwork Models Bayesian learning from marginal data in bionetwork models . Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 1

2011
[11]

, Coles, S G

bortot07 APACrefauthors Bortot, P. , Coles, S G. \ Sisson, S A. APACrefauthors \ 2007 . Inference for stereological extremes Inference for stereological extremes . Journal of the American Statistical Association 102 477 84-92

2007
[12]

\ Pettitt, A

cameron2012approximate APACrefauthors Cameron, E. \ Pettitt, A. APACrefauthors \ 2012 . Approximate B ayesian C omputation for astronomical model analysis: a case study in galaxy demographics and morphological transformation at high redshift Approximate B ayesian C omputation ...

2012
[13]

, Santos, F

cornuet2008inferring APACrefauthors Cornuet, J M. , Santos, F. , Beaumont, M A. , Robert, C P. , Marin, J M. , Balding, D J. Estoup, A. APACrefauthors \ 2008 . Inferring population history with DIY ABC : a user-friendly approach to approximate B ayesian computation Inferring p...

2008
[14]

\ Kristensen, D

creel2015abc APACrefauthors Creel, M. \ Kristensen, D. APACrefauthors \ 2015 . ABC of SV : Limited information likelihood inference in stochastic volatility jump-diffusion models ABC of SV : Limited information likelihood inference in stochastic volatility jump-diffusion model...

2015
[15]

, Moores, M T

drovandi2018accelerating APACrefauthors Drovandi, C C. , Moores, M T. \ Boys, R J. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Accelerating pseudo-marginal MCMC using G aussian processes Accelerating pseudo-marginal MCMC using G aussian processes . Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 118 1--17

2018
[16]

APACrefauthors \ 2009

evensen2009data APACrefauthors Evensen, G. APACrefauthors \ 2009 . Data assimilation: the ensemble K alman filter Data assimilation: the ensemble K alman filter . Springer Science & Business Media

2009
[17]

APACrefauthors \ 2017

everitt2017bootstrapped APACrefauthors Everitt, R G. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Bootstrapped synthetic likelihood Bootstrapped synthetic likelihood . arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05825

2017 arXiv
[18]

, Nott, D J

fan+ns13 APACrefauthors Fan, Y. , Nott, D J. \ Sisson, S A. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . Approximate B ayesian computation via regression density estimation Approximate B ayesian computation via regression density estimation . Stat 2 1 34--48 . APACrefURL http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/...

2013 doi
[19]

, Pya, N

fasiolo2016comparison APACrefauthors Fasiolo, M. , Pya, N. \ Wood, S N. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . A comparison of inferential methods for highly nonlinear state space models in ecology and epidemiology A comparison of inferential methods for highly nonlinear state space models i...

2016
[20]

\ Prangle, D

fearnhead2012constructing APACrefauthors Fearnhead, P. \ Prangle, D. APACrefauthors \ 2012 . Constructing summary statistics for approximate B ayesian computation: semi-automatic approximate B ayesian computation Constructing summary statistics for approximate B ayesian comput...

2012
[21]

\ Olkin, I

ghurye1969unbiased APACrefauthors Ghurye, S. \ Olkin, I. APACrefauthors \ 1969 . Unbiased estimation of some multivariate probability densities and related functions Unbiased estimation of some multivariate probability densities and related functions . The Annals of Mathematic...

1969
[22]

, Monfort, A

gourieroux1993indirect APACrefauthors Gourieroux, C. , Monfort, A. \ Renault, E. APACrefauthors \ 1993 . Indirect inference Indirect inference . Journal of applied econometrics 8 S1 S85--S118

1993
[23]

\ Liseo, B

grazian2017approximate APACrefauthors Grazian, C. \ Liseo, B. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Approximate B ayesian inference in semiparametric copula models Approximate B ayesian inference in semiparametric copula models . Bayesian Analysis 12 4 991--1016

2017
[24]

, Nonnenmacher, M

greenberg19 APACrefauthors Greenberg, D S. , Nonnenmacher, M. \ Macke, J H. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Automatic Posterior Transformation for Likelihood-free Inference Automatic posterior transformation for likelihood-free inference . arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.07488v1

2019 arXiv
[25]

\ Judge, G

grendar2009asymptotic APACrefauthors Grend \'a r, M. \ Judge, G. APACrefauthors \ 2009 . Asymptotic equivalence of empirical likelihood and B ayesian MAP Asymptotic equivalence of empirical likelihood and B ayesian MAP . The Annals of Statistics 37 5A 2445--2457

2009
[26]

\ Corander, J

gutmann2016bayesian APACrefauthors Gutmann, M U. \ Corander, J. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . Bayesian optimization for likelihood-free inference of simulator-based statistical models Bayesian optimization for likelihood-free inference of simulator-based statistical models . The Jou...

2016
[27]

, Dutta, R

gutmann2018likelihood APACrefauthors Gutmann, M U. , Dutta, R. , Kaski, S. \ Corander, J. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Likelihood-free inference via classification Likelihood-free inference via classification . Statistics and Computing 28 2 411--425

2018
[28]

, Powell, A

itan2009origins APACrefauthors Itan, Y. , Powell, A. , Beaumont, M A. , Burger, J. \ Thomas, M G. APACrefauthors \ 2009 . The origins of lactase persistence in E urope The origins of lactase persistence in E urope . PLoS computational biology 5 8 e1000491

2009
[29]

, Lee, A B

izbicki18 APACrefauthors Izbicki, R. , Lee, A B. \ Pospisil, T. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . ABC-CDE : Toward A pproximate B ayesian C omputation With Complex High-Dimensional Data and Limited Simulations ABC-CDE : Toward A pproximate B ayesian C omputation with complex high-dimens...

2019
[30]

a rvenp \

jarvenpaa2019efficient APACrefauthors J \"a rvenp \"a \"a , M. , Gutmann, M U. , Pleska, A. , Vehtari, A. \ Marttinen, P. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Efficient acquisition rules for model-based approximate B ayesian computation Efficient acquisition rules for model-based approxima...

2019
[31]

a rvenp \

jarvenpaa2018gaussian APACrefauthors J \"a rvenp \"a \"a , M. , Gutmann, M U. , Vehtari, A. \ Marttinen, P. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Gaussian process modelling in approximate B ayesian computation to estimate horizontal gene transfer in bacteria Gaussian process modelling in ap...

2018
[32]

\ Bickel, P

lei2009ensemble APACrefauthors Lei, J. \ Bickel, P. APACrefauthors \ 2009 . Ensemble filtering for high dimensional non-linear state space models Ensemble filtering for high dimensional non-linear state space models . University of California, Berkeley, Rep 779 23

2009
[33]

\ Wegmann, D

leuenberger2010bayesian APACrefauthors Leuenberger, C. \ Wegmann, D. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . Bayesian computation and model selection without likelihoods Bayesian computation and model selection without likelihoods . Genetics 184 1 243--252

2010
[34]

\ Fearnhead, P

li2016improved APACrefauthors Li, W. \ Fearnhead, P. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . Improved convergence of regression adjusted approximate B ayesian computation Improved convergence of regression adjusted approximate B ayesian computation . arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.07135

2016 arXiv
[35]

, Sisson, S A

luciani2009epidemiological APACrefauthors Luciani, F. , Sisson, S A. , Jiang, H. , Francis, A R. \ Tanaka, M M. APACrefauthors \ 2009 . The epidemiological fitness cost of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis The epidemiological fitness cost of drug resistance in myco...

2009
[36]

, Bassetto, G

lueckmann2018likelihood APACrefauthors Lueckmann, J M. , Bassetto, G. , Karaletsos, T. \ Macke, J H. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Likelihood-free inference with emulator networks Likelihood-free inference with emulator networks . arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.09294

2018 arXiv
[37]

, J., G P

lueckmann17 APACrefauthors Lueckmann, J M. , J., G P. , Bassetto, G. , \" O cal, K. , Nonnenmacher, M. \ Macke, J H. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Flexible statistical inference for mechanistic models of neural dynamics Flexible statistical inference for mechanistic models of neural...

2017
[38]

, Pudlo, P

marin2012approximate APACrefauthors Marin, J M. , Pudlo, P. , Robert, C P. \ Ryder, R J. APACrefauthors \ 2012 . Approximate B ayesian computational methods Approximate B ayesian computational methods . Statistics and Computing 22 6 1167--1180

2012
[39]

, Raynal, L

marin2016abc APACrefauthors Marin, J M. , Raynal, L. , Pudlo, P. , Ribatet, M. \ Robert, C P. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . ABC random forests for B ayesian parameter inference ABC random forests for B ayesian parameter inference . Bioinformatics 35 10

2019
[40]

, Molitor, J

marjoram03 APACrefauthors Marjoram, P. , Molitor, J. , Plagnol, V. \ Tavar\'e, S. APACrefauthors \ 2003 . Markov chain Monte Carlo without likelihoods Markov chain Monte Carlo without likelihoods . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 15324 -- 15328

2003
[41]

\ Welling, M

meeds2014gps APACrefauthors Meeds, E. \ Welling, M. APACrefauthors \ 2014 . GPS-ABC : G aussian process surrogate approximate B ayesian computation GPS-ABC : G aussian process surrogate approximate B ayesian computation . arXiv preprint arXiv:1401.2838

2014 arXiv
[42]

, Pudlo, P

mengersen2013bayesian APACrefauthors Mengersen, K L. , Pudlo, P. \ Robert, C P. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . Bayesian computation via empirical likelihood Bayesian computation via empirical likelihood . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 4 1321--1326

2013
[43]

, Drovandi, C C

nott2018approximation APACrefauthors Nott, D J. , Drovandi, C C. , Mengersen, K. \ Evans, M. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Approximation of B ayesian Predictive p -Values with Regression ABC Approximation of B ayesian predictive p -values with regression ABC . Bayesian Analysis 13 1 59--83

2018
[44]

, Fan, Y

nott2014approximate APACrefauthors Nott, D J. , Fan, Y. , Marshall, L. \ Sisson, S. APACrefauthors \ 2014 . Approximate B ayesian computation and B ayes’ linear analysis: toward high-dimensional ABC Approximate B ayesian computation and B ayes’ linear analysis: toward high-dim...

2014
[45]

, Marshall, L

nott2012ensemble APACrefauthors Nott, D J. , Marshall, L. \ Tran, M N. APACrefauthors \ 2012 . The ensemble K alman filter is an ABC algorithm The ensemble K alman filter is an ABC algorithm . Statistics and Computing 22 6 1273--1276

2012
[46]

, Gutmann, M

numminen2016impact APACrefauthors Numminen, E. , Gutmann, M. , Shubin, M. , Marttinen, P. , Meric, G. , van Schaik, W. Sheppard, S K. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . The impact of host metapopulation structure on the population genetics of colonizing bacteria The impact of host metapo...

2016
[47]

\ Balding, D J

nunes2010optimal APACrefauthors Nunes, M A. \ Balding, D J. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . On optimal selection of summary statistics for approximate B ayesian computation On optimal selection of summary statistics for approximate B ayesian computation . Statistical applications in g...

2010
[48]

APACrefauthors \ 1988

owen1988empirical APACrefauthors Owen, A B. APACrefauthors \ 1988 . Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional Empirical likelihood ratio confidence intervals for a single functional . Biometrika 75 2 237--249

1988
[49]

APACrefauthors \ 2001

owen2001empirical APACrefauthors Owen, A B. APACrefauthors \ 2001 . Empirical likelihood Empirical likelihood . Chapman and Hall/CRC

2001
[50]

, Lopes, J

palero2009rapid APACrefauthors Palero, F. , Lopes, J. , Abell \'o , P. , Macpherson, E. , Pascual, M. \ Beaumont, M A. APACrefauthors \ 2009 . Rapid radiation in spiny lobsters (Palinurus spp) as revealed by classic and ABC methods using mt DNA and microsatellite data Rapid ra...

2009
[51]

\ Murray, I

papamakarios2016fast APACrefauthors Papamakarios, G. \ Murray, I. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . Fast -free inference of simulation models with B ayesian conditional density estimation Fast -free inference of simulation models with B ayesian conditional density estimation . Advances ...

2016
[52]

, Pavlakou, T

papamakarios17 APACrefauthors Papamakarios, G. , Pavlakou, T. \ Murray, I. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Masked autoregressive flow for density estimation Masked autoregressive flow for density estimation . Neural Information Processing Systems 30 Neural information processing syste...

2017
[53]

, Sterratt, D C

papamakarios19 APACrefauthors Papamakarios, G. , Sterratt, D C. \ Murray, I. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Sequential Neural Likelihood: Fast Likelihood-free Inference with Autoregressive Flows Sequential neural likelihood: Fast likelihood-free inference with autoregressive flows . ...

2019 arXiv
[54]

, Drovandi, C C

price2018bayesian APACrefauthors Price, L F. , Drovandi, C C. , Lee, A. \ Nott, D J. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Bayesian synthetic likelihood Bayesian synthetic likelihood . Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 27 1 1--11

2018
[55]

, Seielstad, M T

pritchard1999population APACrefauthors Pritchard, J K. , Seielstad, M T. , Perez-Lezaun, A. \ Feldman, M W. APACrefauthors \ 1999 . Population growth of human Y chromosomes: a study of Y chromosome microsatellites. Population growth of human Y chromosomes: a study of Y chromos...

1999
[56]

, Mertens, U K

radev19 APACrefauthors Radev, S T. , Mertens, U K. , Voss, A. \ K\" o the, U. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Towards end-to-end likelihood-free inference with convolutional neural networks Towards end-to-end likelihood-free inference with convolutional neural networks . British Journ...

2019 doi
[57]

APACrefauthors \ 1954

ricker1954stock APACrefauthors Ricker, W E. APACrefauthors \ 1954 . Stock and recruitment Stock and recruitment . Journal of the Fisheries Board of Canada 11 5 559--623

1954
[58]

, Nott, D J

rodrigues2016functional APACrefauthors Rodrigues, G. , Nott, D J. \ Sisson, S A. APACrefauthors \ 2016 . Functional regression approximate B ayesian computation for G aussian process density estimation Functional regression approximate B ayesian computation for G aussian proce...

2016
[59]

, Gascuel, O

saulnier2017inferring APACrefauthors Saulnier, E. , Gascuel, O. \ Alizon, S. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Inferring epidemiological parameters from phylogenies using regression- ABC : A comparative study Inferring epidemiological parameters from phylogenies using regression- ABC : ...

2017
[60]

APACrefauthors \ 2005

schennach2005bayesian APACrefauthors Schennach, S M. APACrefauthors \ 2005 . Bayesian exponentially tilted empirical likelihood Bayesian exponentially tilted empirical likelihood . Biometrika 92 1 31--46

2005
[61]

, Wilson, A

shah2014student APACrefauthors Shah, A. , Wilson, A. \ Ghahramani, Z. APACrefauthors \ 2014 . Student-t processes as alternatives to G aussian processes Student-t processes as alternatives to G aussian processes . Artificial Intelligence and Statistics Artificial intelligence ...

2014
[62]

\ Fan, Y

sissonfan2018 APACrefauthors Sisson, S A. \ Fan, Y. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . ABC samplers ABC samplers . S A. Sisson, Y. Fan \ M A. Beaumont\ ( ), Handbook of A pproximate B ayesian C omputation Handbook of A pproximate B ayesian C omputation \ ( 87- 124). Chapman & Hall/CRC Press

2018
[63]

, Fan, Y

sissonfb18 APACrefauthors Sisson, S A. , Fan, Y. \ Beaumont, M A. APACrefauthors \ 2018 1 . Handbook of A pproximate B ayesian C omputation Handbook of A pproximate B ayesian C omputation . Chapman & Hall/CRC Press

2018
[64]

, Fan, Y

sisson+fb2018 APACrefauthors Sisson, S A. , Fan, Y. \ Beaumont, M A. APACrefauthors \ 2018 2 . Overview of ABC Overview of ABC . S A. Sisson, Y. Fan \ M A. Beaumont\ ( ), Handbook of A pproximate B ayesian C omputation Handbook of A pproximate B ayesian C omputation \ ( 3- 54)...

2018
[65]

, Fan, Y

sisson2007sequential APACrefauthors Sisson, S A. , Fan, Y. \ Tanaka, M M. APACrefauthors \ 2007 . Sequential M onte C arlo without likelihoods Sequential M onte C arlo without likelihoods . Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 6 1760--1765

2007
[66]

, Balding, D J

tavare97 APACrefauthors Tavar\'e, S. , Balding, D J. , Griffiths, R C. \ Donnelly, P. APACrefauthors \ 1997 . Inferring coalescence times from DNA sequence data Inferring coalescence times from DNA sequence data . Genetics 145 2 505-518

1997
[67]

\ Ojanen, J

vehtari2012survey APACrefauthors Vehtari, A. \ Ojanen, J. APACrefauthors \ 2012 . A survey of B ayesian predictive methods for model assessment, selection and comparison A survey of B ayesian predictive methods for model assessment, selection and comparison . Statistics Survey...

2012
[68]

APACrefauthors \ 2013

wilkinson2013approximate APACrefauthors Wilkinson, R D. APACrefauthors \ 2013 . Approximate B ayesian computation ( ABC ) gives exact results under the assumption of model error Approximate B ayesian computation ( ABC ) gives exact results under the assumption of model error ....

2013
[69]

APACrefauthors \ 2014

wilkinson2014accelerating APACrefauthors Wilkinson, R D. APACrefauthors \ 2014 . Accelerating ABC methods using G aussian processes Accelerating ABC methods using G aussian processes . arXiv preprint arXiv:1401.1436

2014 arXiv
[70]

\ Rasmussen, C E

williams2006gaussian APACrefauthors Williams, C K. \ Rasmussen, C E. APACrefauthors \ 2006 . Gaussian processes for machine learning Gaussian processes for machine learning \ ( 2)\ ( 3). MIT Press Cambridge, MA

2006
[71]

APACrefauthors \ 2010

wood2010statistical APACrefauthors Wood, S N. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . Statistical inference for noisy nonlinear ecological dynamic systems Statistical inference for noisy nonlinear ecological dynamic systems . Nature 466 7310 1102

2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

, Beaumont, M A

aeschbacher2012novel APACrefauthors Aeschbacher, S. , Beaumont, M A. \ Futschik, A. APACrefauthors \ 2012 . A novel approach for choosing summary statistics in approximate B ayesian computation A novel approach for choosing summary statistics in approximate B ayesian computation . Genetics 192 3 1027--1047

work page 2012

[2] [2]

, Charnock, T

alsing19 APACrefauthors Alsing, J. , Charnock, T. , Feeney, S. \ Wandelt, B. APACrefauthors \ 2019 . Fast likelihood-free cosmology with neural density estimators and active learning Fast likelihood-free cosmology with neural density estimators and active learning . arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.00007v1

arXiv 2019

[3] [3]

Robust Bayesian Synthetic Likelihood via a Semi-Parametric Approach

an2018robust APACrefauthors An, Z. , Nott, D J. \ Drovandi, C. APACrefauthors \ 2018 . Robust Bayesian synthetic likelihood via a semi-parametric approach Robust bayesian synthetic likelihood via a semi-parametric approach . arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.05800

work page Pith review arXiv 2018

[4] [4]

APACrefauthors \ 2010

beaumont2010approximate APACrefauthors Beaumont, M A. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . Approximate B ayesian computation in evolution and ecology Approximate B ayesian computation in evolution and ecology . Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics 41 379--406

work page 2010

[5] [5]

, Zhang, W

beaumont2002approximate APACrefauthors Beaumont, M A. , Zhang, W. \ Balding, D J. APACrefauthors \ 2002 . Approximate B ayesian computation in population genetics Approximate B ayesian computation in population genetics . Genetics 162 4 2025--2035

work page 2002

[6] [6]

APACrefauthors \ 2010

blum2010approximateblum APACrefauthors Blum, M G. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . Approximate B ayesian computation: A nonparametric perspective Approximate B ayesian computation: A nonparametric perspective . Journal of the American Statistical Association 105 491 1178--1187

work page 2010

[7] [7]

Regression approaches for Approximate Bayesian Computation

blum2017regression APACrefauthors Blum, M G. APACrefauthors \ 2017 . Regression approaches for approximate B ayesian computation Regression approaches for approximate B ayesian computation . arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.01254

work page Pith review arXiv 2017

[8] [8]

\ Fran c ois, O

blum2010non APACrefauthors Blum, M G. \ Fran c ois, O. APACrefauthors \ 2010 . Non-linear regression models for A pproximate B ayesian C omputation Non-linear regression models for A pproximate B ayesian C omputation . Statistics and Computing 20 1 63--73

work page 2010