Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 155 references

A Survey on Machine Learning for Optical Communication [Machine Learning View]

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This survey maps machine learning for optical communication by algorithm family, claiming to be the first ML-side review of the field.

desk verdict Broad bibliography, but the 'first ML-view' claim is contradicted by the paper's own reference [128], and the tutorial equations need correction. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.05148 v1 pith:UBCRSZU7 submitted 2019-08-21 eess.SP

M. A. Amirabadi This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SP
keywords machinelearningopticalcommunicationsurveysupervisedunsupervisedreinforcementequalizationperformancemonitoring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the research field joining machine learning to optical communication is best understood from the algorithm's side: group the papers by the machine-learning method being used (SVM, neural networks, decision forests, clustering, principal component analysis, Q-learning, and so on), and then look at what optical-communication jobs that method has been asked to do. The survey assembles more than a hundred studies into this ML-first taxonomy, separates them into supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning, and within each family reviews applications in fiber links, optical networks, and wireless optical channels. Its stated reason for caring is practical: most people working on ML for optical communication are optical engineers, not ML specialists, so an algorithm-organised map helps them choose a method. The paper also claims this ML viewpoint is taken for the first time here and that its coverage is broader than earlier surveys.

What carries the argument

The organising device is a two-level taxonomy: first the learning paradigm (supervised, unsupervised, reinforcement), then the algorithm family (SVM, ANN, DNN, CNN, kNN, random forest, regression; k-means and other clustering, EM, PCA; Q-learning, deep RL), and within each family a subdivision by application domain (fiber links, optical networks, wireless optical communications). The taxonomy does the argument's work: it turns a scattered set of experiments into a reusable lookup table, and it makes absences visible, such as the lack of semi-supervised learning in the field.

What would settle it

Read reference [128], a prior review of machine learning techniques in optical communication, and compare the number of unique investigations collected here with the counts in [156] and [152]; if an earlier survey already organises the field by algorithm family or covers more studies, the paper's 'first ML viewpoint' and 'more generality' claims fall.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the ML-for-optical-communication literature can be and should be organised by the machine-learning algorithm rather than by the optical system or network layer. After brief definitions of each algorithm, it walks through supervised methods (support vector machines, artificial neural networks, deep neural networks, convolutional neural networks, k-nearest neighbours, random forests, regression), unsupervised methods (clustering variants, expectation-maximisation, principal component analysis), and reinforcement learning (Q-learning and deep reinforcement learning), noting for each where it has been applied in fiber, network, and wireless-optical settings. Read in the author's intended way, the survey establishes a gap map: many standard ML tools—extreme learning machines, semi-supervised learning, most deep reinforcement learning—are barely used in optical communication, and many optical applications have not yet been touched by ML. The author further claims that earlier surveys looked at the field from the optical-communication side, and that this is the first review to put the ML taxonomy first while covering a larger set of investigations.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's claim of being the first ML-view survey assumes that none of the earlier surveys it cites, including reference [128], already organised the literature by machine-learning method; if any did, the 'first time' claim loses its footing.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • An optical engineer who knows the impairment but not the ML toolbox can look up algorithms by family and find reported applications for detection, equalization, performance monitoring, modulation-format identification, fault prediction, routing, and bandwidth allocation.
  • The algorithm-first map exposes underused methods—extreme learning machines, kernel methods, and deep reinforcement learning appear in only a handful of papers—so the survey functions as a research agenda.
  • Because the taxonomy separates fiber, network, and wireless-optical applications, future surveys can keep the same skeleton and insert new papers without reorganising the field.
  • The reported lack of semi-supervised learning points to a concrete opening: tasks where labels are expensive, such as live-network monitoring, could be tackled with semi-supervised methods.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 'first ML viewpoint' claim should be read as a claim about emphasis, not an absolute about the literature: at least one prior review cited in the paper, reference [128], already discusses machine learning techniques for optical communication, so the real novelty is the algorithm-first organisation and the breadth of coverage rather than the viewpoint itself.
  • A quantitative follow-up could turn the survey's gap map into a table: for each algorithm family, count papers, report testbeds and data sets, and state reported performance gains; that would let optical engineers compare methods directly.
  • The taxonomy predicts that the next high-yield directions are the pairs with the fewest entries, such as deep reinforcement learning for dynamic network control and kernel-based equalizers for wireless optical links, since the paper lists only one or two examples per pair.
  • Any successful semi-supervised optical-communication demonstration would directly fill a hole the survey identifies, because the paper reports no semi-supervised investigations in the field.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to be the first survey of machine learning for optical communication organized from a machine-learning viewpoint. It groups a large set of cited works into supervised learning (SVM, ANN, DNN, CNN, kNN, random forest, regression), unsupervised learning (clustering, expectation maximization, PCA), and reinforcement learning (Q-learning, deep reinforcement learning). For each algorithm it gives a brief definition and then summarizes applications in fiber optical communication, optical networks, and wireless optical communication. The paper asserts that previous tutorials adopted only an optical-communication/network view and that this survey is both novel in viewpoint and broader in coverage.

Significance. A careful ML-centric tutorial of machine learning for optical communication would be useful, because the field is growing quickly and many practitioners come from an optical-communication background. The paper's organization by algorithm family is sensible, and the reference list is broad and includes much recent 2018–2019 work. Those are real strengths of the organizing scheme. However, the paper's stated reason for existence is the claim of firstness, and that claim is contradicted by material in the paper's own bibliography. The tutorial content also contains mathematically malformed equations and several inaccurate or misleading statements about ML methods. Since the value of a survey rests on the reliability and completeness of its narrative, the paper in its current form cannot serve as a dependable reference.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; §I.A; §V] The paper's central contribution claim—'for the first time, this paper reviews ML for OC literature from ML viewpoint'—is contradicted by its own reference list. Reference [128] (Zibar et al., 'Machine learning techniques in optical communication,' J. Lightwave Technol. 34(6), 2016) is a journal tutorial organized around machine-learning techniques applied to optical communication, and it is even cited in §III.B for technical content. The Related Works discussion in §I.A compares only [152]–[156] and does not explain why [128] lacks the 'ML view' that this paper claims to be new. The conclusion in §V repeats that all previous works had an 'Optical Communication view,' which is not supportable in the presence of [128], [153], and [156]. Because firstness is the stated motivation for the survey, this contradiction is load-bearing and undermines the central claim as written.
  2. [§II.A, Eqs. (1)–(3)] The SVM kernel equations are mathematically malformed. Equation (1) is written as K(x,xi)=a0+sum_i ai<x,xi>_i with no exponent, Eq. (2) is written as a0+sum_i ai(<x,xi>)^d_i, which is not the standard polynomial kernel, and Eq. (3) is written as exp(-sum_i ai(x—xi)_i), which is not a Gaussian/RBF kernel because it lacks a squared norm and an appropriate scale parameter. The text also states that 'polynomial and exponential kernels calculate separating hyperplane' without completing the sentence. For a tutorial whose advertised value is teaching ML algorithms to OC researchers, these errors in the central mathematical definitions are substantive and need correction.
  3. [Abstract; §V] The companion claim that 'compared with other works, this survey reviews much more investigations; therefore, it has more generality' is unquantified and unverifiable. The paper gives no search strategy, no inclusion or exclusion criteria, no total number of papers screened, and no bibliometric comparison with [152]–[156]. Without such a protocol, 'much more' is an assertion rather than a documented property of the survey, and it cannot support the paper's stronger-generality claim.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§III] Section III contains a duplicated subsection heading: 'A. Peak search, c-means, hieratical clustering' is followed later by another 'A. k-means clustering,' and the subsection numbering then continues with B and C. The organization should be repaired and renumbered.
  2. [Throughout] There are numerous language errors that impede readability, including 'quiet necessary,' 'cavities of this field,' 'shielded on Fiber OC,' 'a bbeter choice,' 'instigation of k-means,' and 'hieratical clustering.' A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  3. [References] References [32] and [34] are identical entries, and references [108] and [143] are also identical. These duplicates should be removed and the citations renumbered.
  4. [§II.E, Eq. (8)] Equation (8) writes the kNN distance as D(R,Li)=sqrt((R-Li)^2), which is dimensionally inconsistent for vector inputs; it should be a vector norm such as ||R-Li||_2 summed over the feature dimensions.
  5. [Figures and headings] Figure numbering and in-text references are not fully aligned, and several subsections in Section III are labeled inconsistently; for example, the second 'A' heading in Section III should be a different letter and the text around Figs. 14 and 17 could be more explicitly tied to the discussion.
  6. [§II.C, Ref. [74]] Reference [74] is a self-cited arXiv preprint used in §II.C in support of a claim about the fiber Kerr effect. Because it is not peer-reviewed and is cited without independent verification, its status should be clearly flagged or the claim should be supported by a published source.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation found; the 'first ML-view' novelty claim is contradicted by the paper's own reference [128] but that is a factual issue, and the sole self-citation [74] is not load-bearing.

full rationale

This paper is a literature survey, not a derivation chain; there are no fitted parameters, equations, or predictions whose outputs are re-inserted as inputs. The central novelty claim, 'for the first time, this paper reviews ML for OC literature from ML viewpoint' (Abstract) and 'none of them had ML view' (Section I.A), is a historical assertion. It is contradicted by the paper's own bibliography: reference [128] is Zibar et al., 'Machine learning techniques in optical communication,' J. Lightwave Technol. 34(6), 2016, which is a prior tutorial on ML techniques in OC and is even used as a technical citation in Section III.B. A false or unsupported novelty claim is a correctness problem, not a circularity problem: the claim is not obtained by defining 'ML view' in terms of the conclusion, and no equation or fitted value reduces to its own input. The only self-citation is [74], the author's own arXiv preprint, cited in Section II.C in the phrase 'fiber Kerr effect [74]'; this citation is not load-bearing because it merely appears in a list of impairment sources and no result is derived from it. There is no imported uniqueness theorem, no ansatz smuggled via citation, and no renaming of a known result. The score reflects the minor non-load-bearing self-citation; the paper's technical survey content is otherwise independent of self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey introduces no new parameters or entities. It rests on two unstated assumptions: that its literature coverage is complete and accurate, and that no prior survey took an ML viewpoint. Both are questionable given the cited prior surveys and the observed errors.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The survey's classification of cited works by ML algorithm is exhaustive and accurate.
    The survey provides no explicit search strategy or inclusion criteria, and several descriptions of ML methods are factually incorrect.
  • domain assumption No prior survey adopted an ML viewpoint, making this survey the first.
    The paper asserts this in the abstract and conclusion, but cites [128] which is a review of machine learning techniques in optical communication.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Survey on Machine Learning for Optical Communication [Machine Learning View]." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UBCRSZU7

@misc{pith2026190905148,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Survey on Machine Learning for Optical Communication [Machine Learning View]},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UBCRSZU7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.05148}
}
read the original abstract

Machine Learning (ML) for Optical Communication (OC) is certainly a hot topic emerged recently and will continue to raise interest at least for the next few years. The rate of research development in this area is growing very rapidly. Novelty of this research direction resides mainly in the peculiarity of the application field, rather than in the methodological approaches, which are (at least up to now) state-of-the-art ML algorithms. Reviewing the literature shows that many of the ML algorithms have not yet been used in this area, and many of the OC applications are not considered yet, which reflects the fact that the research topic is pristine. Accordingly, tutorial investigations are quiet necessary in this filed to help researchers be aware about the last progressions and cavities of this field. Although several tutorials have been released recently, they considered this topic from OC view, and neglected ML view. However, it is required to have an investigations about the ML algorithms used in this subject. Accordingly, for the first time, this paper reviews ML for OC literature from ML viewpoint. This view could be really helpful because only OC experts work on ML for OC, and they are not ML experts, so it could really help them to have a comprehensive view on the ML subjects implantable in OC. It has worth to mention that compared with other works, this survey reviews much more investigations; therefore, it has more generality, and gives the reader to have a comprehensive overview on this topic.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

155 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [128]

    Zibar, D., Piels, M., Jones, R., & Schäeffer, C. G. (2016). Machine learning techniques in optical communication. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 34(6), 1442-1452

    work page 2016

  2. [74]

    Amirabadi, M. A. (2019). Novel Suboptimal approaches for Hyperparameter Tuning of Deep Neural Network [under the shelf of Optical Communication]. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.00036

    arXiv 2019

  3. [152]

    J., Merayo, N., Singh, S

    Mata, J., De Miguel, I., Duran, R. J., Merayo, N., Singh, S. K., Jukan, A., & Chamania, M. (2018). Artificial intelligence (AI) methods in optical networks: A comprehensive survey. Optical Switching and Networking, 28, 43-57

    work page 2018

  4. [156]

    N., Fan, Q., Lu, C., & Lau, A

    Khan, F. N., Fan, Q., Lu, C., & Lau, A. P. T. (2019). An Optical Communication's Perspective on Machine Learning and Its Applications. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 37(2), 493-516

    work page 2019

  5. [153]

    Musumeci, F., Rottondi, C., Nag, A., Macaluso, I., Zibar, D., Ruffini, M., & Tornatore, M. (2018). An overview on application of machine learning techniques in optical networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials

    work page 2018

  6. [1]

    Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning. springer. Interpreter Environment Agent State Reward Initialize Q table Choose an action a Perform action Measure reward Update Q Good Q table (a) (b) Interpreter Environment Agent State Reward (c) Fig.19. a. Reinforcement Learning, b. Q-Learning, and c. Deep Reinforcement Learning. 21

    2006

  7. [2]

    (2015, September)

    Wang, D., Zhang, M., Li, Z., Cui, Y., Liu, J., Yang, Y., & Wang, H. (2015, September). Nonlinear decision boundary created by a machine learning-based classifier to mitigate nonlinear phase noise. In 2015 European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC) (pp. 1-3). IEEE

    2015

  8. [3]

    Han, Y., Yu, S., Li, M., Yang, J., & Gu, W. (2014). An SVM-based detection for coherent optical APSK systems with nonlinear phase noise. IEEE Photonics Journal, 6(5), 1-10

    2014

Show all 155 references
  1. [4]

    Li, M., Yu, S., Yang, J., Chen, Z., Han, Y., & Gu, W. (2013). Nonparameter nonlinear phase noise mitigation by using M-ary support vector machine for coherent optical systems. IEEE Photonics Journal, 5(6), 7800312-7800312

    2013

  2. [5]

    & Luo, B

    Wang, D., Zhang, M., Cai, Z., Cui, Y., Li, Z., Han, H., ... & Luo, B. (2016). Combatting nonlinear phase noise in coherent optical systems with an optimized decision processor based on machine learning. Optics Communications, 369, 199-208

    2016

  3. [6]

    (2017, July)

    Du, J., Sun, L., Chen, G., & He, Z. (2017, July). Machine learning assisted optical interconnection. In 2017 Opto- Electronics and Communications Conference (OECC) and Photonics Global Conference (PGC) (pp. 1-3). IEEE

    2017

  4. [7]

    C., Jones, R., & Zibar, D

    Thrane, J., Wass, J., Piels, M., Diniz, J. C., Jones, R., & Zibar, D. (2017). Machine learning techniques for optical performance monitoring from directly detected PDM-QAM signals. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 35(4), 868-875

    2017

  5. [8]

    (2014, June)

    Hui-Ping, Z., Hong -Yan, H., & Meng -Xia, G. (2014, June). Research of Fiber-Optical Fault Diagnosis Based on Support Vector Machine (SVM) Mining. In 2014 Fifth International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Engineering Applications (pp. 803-807). IEEE

    2014

  6. [9]

    (2016, July)

    Yuan, Y., Zhang, M., Luo, P., Ghassemlooy, Z., Wang, D., Tang, X., & Han, D. (2016, July). SVM detection for superposed pulse amplitude modulation in visible light communications. In 2016 10th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks and Digital Signal Proces...

    2016

  7. [10]

    Cui, Y., Zhang, M., Wang, D., Liu, S., Li, Z., & Chang, G. K. (2017). Bit-based support vector machine nonlinear detector for millimeter-wave radio-over-fiber mobile fronthaul systems. Optics express, 25(21), 26186-26197

    2017

  8. [11]

    Sun, X., Su, S., Huang, Z., Zuo, Z., Guo, X., & Wei, J. (2019). Blind modulation format identification using decision tree twin support vector machine in optical communication system. Optics Communications, 438, 67-77

    2019

  9. [12]

    Sun, L., Du, J., Chen, G., He, Z., Chen, X., & Reed, G. T. (2017, July). Machine-learning detector based on support vector machine for 122-Gbps multi-CAP optical communication system. In 2017 Opto-Electronics and Communications Conference (OECC) and Photonics Global Conference...

    2017

  10. [13]

    (2017, August)

    Sun, Y., Hu, J., Tian, Z., Liu, X., & Lu, H. (2017, August). Equalization algorithm based on CMA and SVM for carrierless amplitude phase modulation in optical access networks. In 2017 16th International Conference on Optical Communications and Networks (ICOCN) (pp. 1-3). IEEE

    2017

  11. [14]

    Liang, A., Yang, C., Zhang, C., Liu, Y., Zhang, F., Zhang, Z., & Li, H. (2018). Experimental study of support vector machine based nonlinear equalizer for VCSEL based optical interconnect. Optics Communications, 427, 641-647

    2018

  12. [15]

    Wang, C., Du, J., Chen, G., Wang, H., Sun, L., Xu, K., ... & He, Z. (2019). QAM classification methods by SVM machine learning for improved optical interconnection. Optics Communications

    2019

  13. [16]

    F., Tsokanos, A., Wei, J., McCarthy, M

    Giacoumidis, E., Mhatli, S., Stephens, M. F., Tsokanos, A., Wei, J., McCarthy, M. E., ... & Ellis, A. D. (2017). Reduction of nonlinear intersubcarrier intermixing in coherent optical OFDM by a fast newton -based support vector machine nonlinear equalizer. Journal of Lightwave...

    2017

  14. [17]

    T., Aldaya, I., McCarthy, M

    Giacoumidis, E., Mhatli, S., Le, S. T., Aldaya, I., McCarthy, M. E., Ellis, A. D., & Eggleton, B. J. (2016, September). Nonlinear blind equalization for 16-QAM coherent optical OFDM using support vector machines. In ECOC 2016; 42nd European Conference on Optical Communication ...

    2016

  15. [18]

    Nguyen, T., Mhatli, S., Giacoumidis, E., Van Compernolle, L., Wuilpart, M., & Mégret, P. (2016). Fiber nonlinearity equalizer based on support vector classification for coherent optical OFDM. IEEE Photonics Journal, 8(2), 1- 9. 22

    2016

  16. [19]

    Giacoumidis, E., Tsokanos, A., Ghanbarisabagh, M., Mhatli, S., & Barry, L. P. (2018). Unsupervised Support Vector Machines for Nonlinear Blind Equalization in CO-OFDM. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 30(12), 1091-1094

    2018

  17. [20]

    J., Barry, L

    Giacoumidis, E., Matin, A., Wei, J., Doran, N. J., Barry, L. P., & Wang, X. (2018). Blind nonlinearity equalization by machine -learning-based clustering for single -and multichannel coherent optical OFDM. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 36(3), 721-727

    2018

  18. [21]

    Chen, W., Zhang, J., Gao, M., & Shen, G. (2018). Performance improvement of 64-QAM coherent optical communication system by optimizing symbol decision boundary based on support vector machine. Optics Communications, 410, 1-7

    2018

  19. [22]

    D., Wang, J., & Chen, Y

    Ding, G., Wu, Q., Yao, Y. D., Wang, J., & Chen, Y. (2013). Kernel-based learning for statistical signal processing in cognitive radio networks: Theoretical foundations, example applications, and future directions. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 30(4), 126-136

    2013

  20. [23]

    Jarajreh, M. A. (2018). Compensation of filter cascading effects and non-linearities in flexible multi-carrier-based optical networks using a complex-kernel-based support vector machine. IET Communications, 12(14), 1737-1742

    2018

  21. [24]

    & Han, D

    Yuan, Y., Zhang, M., Luo, P., Ghassemlooy, Z., Lang, L., Wang, D., ... & Han, D. (2017). SVM-based detection in visible light communications. Optik, 151, 55-64

    2017

  22. [25]

    (2017, July)

    Zhang, J., Chen, W., Gao, M., & Shen, G. (2017, July). Mitigating fiber nonlinearity using support vector machine with genetic algorithm. In Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics/Pacific Rim (p. s1354). Optical Society of America

    2017

  23. [26]

    Gu, B., & Sheng, V. S. (2017). A Robust Regularization Path Algorithm for $\nu $ -Support Vector Classification. IEEE Transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 28(5), 1241-1248

    2017

  24. [27]

    J., & Bucklew, J

    Sebald, D. J., & Bucklew, J. A. (2000). Support vector machine techniques for nonlinear equalization. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 48(11), 3217-3226

    2000

  25. [28]

    J., Aguado, J

    Mata, J., de Miguel, I., Durán, R. J., Aguado, J. C., Merayo, N., Ruiz, L., ... & Abril, E. J. (2017, December). A SVM approach for lightpath QoT estimation in optical transport networks. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) (pp. 4795-4797). IEEE

    2017

  26. [29]

    (2016, September)

    Peng, K., Zhang, M., Li, Q., Lv, H., Kong, X., & Zhang, R. (2016, September). Fiber optic perimeter detection based on principal component analysis. In 2016 15th International Conference on Optical Communications and Networks (ICOCN) (pp. 1-3). IEEE

    2016

  27. [30]

    & Liu, Z

    Wang, Z., Zhang, M., Wang, D., Song, C., Liu, M., Li, J., ... & Liu, Z. (2017). Failure prediction using machine learning and time series in optical network. Optics express, 25(16), 18553-18565

    2017

  28. [31]

    (2015, May)

    Zheng, C., Yu, S., & Gu, W. (2015, May). A SVM-based processor for free-space optical communication. In 2015 IEEE 5th International Conference on Electronics Information and Emergency Communication (pp. 30-33). IEEE

    2015

  29. [32]

    Wang, D., Zhang, M., Li, Z., Song, C., Fu, M., Li, J., & Chen, X. (2017). System impairment compensation in coherent optical comm unications by using a bio -inspired detector based on artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Optics Communications, 399, 1-12

    2017

  30. [33]

    F., Chamoso, P., & De la Prieta, F

    Villarrubia, G., De Paz, J. F., Chamoso, P., & De la Prieta, F. (2018). Artificial neural networks used in optimization problems. Neurocomputing, 272, 10-16

    2018

  31. [34]

    Wang, D., Zhang, M., Li, Z., Song, C., Fu, M., Li, J., & Chen, X. (2017). System impairment compensation in coherent optical communications by using a bio -inspired detector based on artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Optics Communications, 399, 1-12

    2017

  32. [35]

    Mizobuchi, T., Mizote, K., Kishikawa, H., Goto, N., & Yanagiya, S. I. (2012, July). QPSK label processing using complex-valued neural network learned with back propagation of teacher signals. In 2012 17th Opto-Electronics and Communications Conference (pp. 309-310). IEEE

    2012

  33. [36]

    Argyris, A., Bueno, J., & Fischer, I. (2018). Photonic machine learning implementation for signal recovery in optical communications. Scientific reports, 8(1), 8487. 23

    2018

  34. [37]

    Lyubomirsky, I. (2015). Machine learning equalization techniques for high speed PAM4 fiber optic communication systems. CS229 Final Project Report, Stanford University

    2015

  35. [38]

    T., & Kumar, K

    Ahmad, S. T., & Kumar, K. P. (2016). Radial basis function neural network nonlinear equalizer for 16-QAM coherent optical OFDM. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 28(22), 2507-2510

    2016

  36. [39]

    T., Ghanbarisabagh, M., McCarthy, M., Aldaya, I., Mhatli, S.,

    Giacoumidis, E., Le, S. T., Ghanbarisabagh, M., McCarthy, M., Aldaya, I., Mhatli, S., ... & Eggleton, B. J. (2015). Fiber nonlinearity-induced penalty reduction in CO -OFDM by ANN-based nonlinear equalization. Optics letters, 40(21), 5113-5116

    2015

  37. [40]

    F., & Fernandes, M

    de Sousa, T. F., & Fernandes, M. A. (2013, August). Multilayer perceptron equalizer for optical communication systems. In 2013 SBMO/IEEE MTT-S International Microwave & Optoelectronics Conference (IMOC) (pp. 1-5). IEEE

    2013

  38. [41]

    Liu, S., Wang, X., Zhang, W., Shen, G., & Tian, H. (2017). An Adaptive Activated ANN Equalizer Applied in Millimeter-Wave RoF Transmission System. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 29(22), 1935-1938

    2017

  39. [42]

    M., Shen, S., Xu, M., Tian, H., & Chang, G

    Liu, S., Alfadhli, Y. M., Shen, S., Xu, M., Tian, H., & Chang, G. K. (2018). A Novel ANN Equalizer to Mitigate Nonlinear Interference in Analog-RoF Mobile Fronthaul. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 30(19), 1675-1678

    2018

  40. [43]

    Jarajreh, M. A. K., Rajbhandari, S., Giacoumidis, E., Doran, N. J., & Ghassemlooy, Z. (2014, July). Fibre impairment compensation using art ificial neural network equalizer for high -capacity coherent optical OFDM signals. In 2014 9th International Symposium on Communication S...

    2014

  41. [44]

    A., Giacoumidis, E., Aldaya, I., Le, S

    Jarajreh, M. A., Giacoumidis, E., Aldaya, I., Le, S. T., Tsokanos, A., Ghassemlooy, Z., & Doran, N. J. (2015). Artificial neural network nonlinear equalizer for coherent optical OFDM. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 27(4), 387- 390

    2015

  42. [45]

    V., Ives, D

    Caballero, F. V., Ives, D. J., Laperle, C., Charlton, D., Zhuge, Q., O’Sullivan, M., & Savory, S. J. (2018). Machine learning based linear and nonlinear noise estimation. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 10(10), D42- D51

    2018

  43. [46]

    (2017, September)

    Samadi, P., Amar, D., Lepers, C., Lourdiane, M., & Bergman, K. (2017, September). Quality of transmission prediction with machine learning for dynamic operation of optical WDM networks. In 2017 European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC) (pp. 1-3). IEEE

    2017

  44. [47]

    A., Skoog, R

    Wu, X., Jargon, J. A., Skoog, R. A., Paraschis, L., & Willner, A. E. (2009). Applications of artificial neural networks in optical performance monitoring. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 27(16), 3580-3589

    2009

  45. [48]

    S., Yang, A

    Lai, J. S., Yang, A. Y., Zuo, L., & Sun, Y. N. (2011, November). Optical performance monitoring in 40-Gbps optical duobinary system using artificial neural networks trained with reconstructed eye diagram parameters. In Asia Communications and Photonics Conference and Exhibitio...

    2011

  46. [49]

    (2011, August)

    Lai, J., Yang, A., & Sun, Y. (2011, August). Multiple-impairment monitoring for 40-Gbps RZ-OOK using artificial neural networks trained with reconstructed eye diagram parameters. In 2011 International Quantum Electronics Conference (IQEC) and Conference on Lasers and Electro -...

    2011

  47. [50]

    A., Wang, C

    Wu, X., Jargon, J. A., Wang, C. M., & Willner, A. E. (2010, March). Experimental comparison of performance monitoring using neural networks trained with parameters derived from delay-tap plots and eye diagrams. In National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference (p. JThA17). Optical ...

    2010

  48. [51]

    N., Shen, T

    Khan, F. N., Shen, T. S. R., Zhou, Y., Lau, A. P. T., & Lu, C. (2012). Optical performance monitoring using artificial neural networks trained with empirical moments of asynchronously sampled signal amplitudes. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 24(12), 982-984

    2012

  49. [52]

    Shen, T. S. R., Meng, K., Lau, A. P. T., & Dong, Z. Y. (2010). Optical performance monitoring using artificial neural network trained with asynchronous amplitude histograms. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 22(22), 1665-1667. 24

    2010

  50. [53]

    A., Paraschis, L., & Willner, A

    Wu, X., Jargon, J. A., Paraschis, L., & Willner, A. E. (2011). ANN-based optical performance monitoring of QPSK signals using parameters derived from balanced -detected asynchronous diagrams. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 23(4), 248-250

    2011

  51. [54]

    A., Bülow, H., & Leven, A

    Eriksson, T. A., Bülow, H., & Leven, A. (2017). Applying neural networks in optical communication systems: possible pitfalls. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 29(23), 2091-2094

    2017

  52. [55]

    N., Zhou, Y., Lau, A

    Khan, F. N., Zhou, Y., Lau, A. P. T., & Lu, C. (2012). Modulation format identification in heterogeneous fiber- optic networks using artificial neural networks. Optics express, 20(11), 12422-12431

    2012

  53. [56]

    Wang, D., Zhang, M., Zhang, Z., Li, J., Gao, H., Zhang, F., & Chen, X. (2019). Machine Learning-Based Multifunctional Optical Spectrum Analysis Technique. IEEE Access, 7, 19726-19737

    2019

  54. [57]

    Barboza, E. D. A., Bastos-Filho, C. J., Martins-Filho, J. F., de Moura, U. C., & de Oliveira, J. R. (2013, August). Self-adaptive erbium -doped fiber amplifiers using machine learning. In 2013 SBMO/IEEE MTT-S International Microwave & Optoelectronics Conference (IMOC) (pp. 1-5). IEEE

    2013

  55. [58]

    Rafique, D., Szyrkowiec, T., Grießer, H., Autenrieth, A., & Elbers, J. P. (2018). Cognitive assurance architecture for optical network fault management. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 36(7), 1443-1450

    2018

  56. [59]

    Zhuge, Q., Zeng, X., Lun, H., Cai, M., Liu, X., Yi, L., & Hu, W. (2019). Application of Machine Learning in Fiber Nonlinearity Modeling and Monitoring for Elastic Optical Networks. Journal of Lightwave Technology

    2019

  57. [60]

    & Yoo, S

    Proietti, R., Chen, X., Zhang, K., Liu, G., Shamsabardeh, M., Castro, A., ... & Yoo, S. B. (2019). Experimental demonstration of machine -learning-aided QoT estimation in multi -domain elastic optical networks with alien wavelengths. IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications ...

    2019

  58. [61]

    N., Mavromatis, A., Gkounis, D., Fan, Q., Ntavou, F.,

    Yan, S., Khan, F. N., Mavromatis, A., Gkounis, D., Fan, Q., Ntavou, F., ... & Lu, C. (2017, September). Field trial of machine-learning-assisted and SDN -based optical network planning with network -scale monitoring database. In 2017 European Conference on Optical Communicatio...

    2017

  59. [62]

    & Plant, D

    Zhou, X., Zhuge, Q., Qiu, M., Xiang, M., Zhang, F., Wu, B., ... & Plant, D. V. (2018). Bandwidth variable transceivers with artificial neural network -aided provisioning and capacity improvement cap abilities in meshed optical networks with cascaded ROADM filtering. Optics Com...

    2018

  60. [63]

    K., & Jukan, A

    Bensalem, M., Singh, S. K., & Jukan, A. (2019). Machine Learning Techniques to Detecting and Preventing Jamming Attacks in Optical Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.07537

    2019 arXiv

  61. [64]

    Aibin, M. (2018). Traffic prediction based on machine learning for elastic optical networks. Optical Switching and Networking, 30, 33-39

    2018

  62. [65]

    (2018, May)

    Ruan, L., & Wong, E. (2018, May). Machine intelligence in allocating bandwidth to achieve low -latency performance. In 2018 International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling (ONDM) (pp. 226-229). IEEE

    2018

  63. [66]

    Li, Z., & Zhao, X. (2017). BP artificial neural network based wave front correction for sensor-less free space optics communication. Optics Communications, 385, 219-228

    2017

  64. [67]

    A., Ghassemlooy, Z., & Popoola, W

    Rajbhandari, S., Haigh, P. A., Ghassemlooy, Z., & Popoola, W. (2013). Wavelet-neural network VLC receiver in the presence of artificial light interference. IEEE photonics technology letters, 25(15), 1424-1427

    2013

  65. [68]

    A., Ghassemlooy, Z., Rajbhandari, S., Papakonstantinou, I., & Popoola, W

    Haigh, P. A., Ghassemlooy, Z., Rajbhandari, S., Papakonstantinou, I., & Popoola, W. (2014). Visible light communications: 170 Mb/s using an artificial neural network equalizer in a low bandwidth white light configuration. Journal of lightwave technology, 32(9), 1807-1813

    2014

  66. [69]

    A., Ghassemlooy, Z., Papakonstantinou, I., & Rajbhandari, S

    Haigh, P. A., Ghassemlooy, Z., Papakonstantinou, I., & Rajbhandari, S. (2013, July). Online artificial neural network equalization for a visible light communications system with an organic light emitting diode based tr ansmitter. In Proceedings of the 2013 18th European Confer...

    2013

  67. [70]

    A., Ghassemlooy, Z., Papakonstantinou, I., Tedde, F., Tedde, S

    Haigh, P. A., Ghassemlooy, Z., Papakonstantinou, I., Tedde, F., Tedde, S. F., Hayden, O., & Rajbhandari, S. (2013, June). A MIMO -ANN system for increasing data rates in organic visible light communications systems. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC)...

    2013

  68. [71]

    , Guo, Q

    Gao, D. , Guo, Q. (2019). Extreme Learning Machine-Based Rec eiver for MIMO LED Communications, arXiv:1903.01551

    2019 arXiv

  69. [72]

    C., Leung, C

    Leung, H. C., Leung, C. S., Wong, E. W., & Li, S. (2017). Extreme learning machine for estimating blocking probability of bufferless OBS/OPS networks. IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications an d Networking, 9(8), 682- 692

    2017

  70. [73]

    (2018, August)

    Xu, T., Xu, T., & Darwazeh, I. (2018, August). Deep learning for interference cancellation in non-orthogonal signal based optical communication systems. In 2018 Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium (PIERS- Toyama) (pp. 241-248). IEEE

    2018

  71. [75]

    Giacoumidis, E., Wei, J., Aldaya, I., & Barry, L. P. (2018). Exceeding the nonlinear Shannon-limit in coherent optical communications using 3D adaptive machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.09120

    2018 arXiv

  72. [76]

    Häger, C., & Pfister, H. D. (2018, March). Nonlinear interference mitigation via deep neural networks. In 2018 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exposition (OFC) (pp. 1-3). IEEE

    2018

  73. [77]

    Poudel, B., Oshima, J., Kobayashi, H., & Iwashita, K. (2019). MIMO detection using a deep learning neural network in a mode division multiplexing optical transmission system. Optics Communications, 440, 41-48

    2019

  74. [78]

    Xiong, Y., Yang, Y., Ye, Y., & Rouskas, G. N. (2019). A machine learning approach to mitigating fragmentation and crosstalk in space division multiplexing elastic optical networks. Optical Fiber Technology, 50, 99-107

    2019

  75. [79]

    N., Zhong, K., Al-Arashi, W

    Khan, F. N., Zhong, K., Al-Arashi, W. H., Yu, C., Lu, C., & Lau, A. P. T. (2016). Modulation format identification in coherent receivers using deep machine learning. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 28(17), 1886-1889

    2016

  76. [80]

    N., Zhong, K., Zhou, X., Al-Arashi, W

    Khan, F. N., Zhong, K., Zhou, X., Al-Arashi, W. H., Yu, C., Lu, C., & Lau, A. P. T. (2017). Joint OSNR monitoring and modulation format identification in digital coherent receivers using deep neural networks. Optics express, 25(15), 17767-17776

    2017

  77. [81]

    A., Bülow, H., Lavery, D.,

    Karanov, B., Chagnon, M., Thouin, F., Eriksson, T. A., Bülow, H., Lavery, D., ... & Schmalen, L. (2018). End-to- end deep learning of optical fiber communications. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 36(20), 4843-4855

    2018

  78. [82]

    Karanov, B., Lavery, D., Bayvel, P., & Schmalen, L. (2019). End-to-End Optimized Transmission over Dispersive Intensity-Modulated Channels Using Bidirectional Recurrent Neural Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.08570

    2019 arXiv

  79. [83]

    O’Shea, T., & Hoydis, J. (2017). An introduction to deep learning for the physical layer. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, 3(4), 563-575

    2017

  80. [84]

    T., Eriksson, T

    Jones, R. T., Eriksson, T. A., Yankov, M. P., & Zibar, D. (2018, September). Deep learning of geometric constellation shaping including fiber nonlinearities. In 2018 European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC) (pp. 1-3). IEEE

    2018

  81. [85]

    (2018, September)

    Li, S., Häger, C., Garcia, N., & Wymeersch, H. (2018, September). Achievable information rates for nonlinear fiber communication via end -to-end autoencoder learning. I n 2018 European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC) (pp. 1-3). IEEE

    2018

  82. [86]

    T., Eriksson, T

    Jones, R. T., Eriksson, T. A., Yankov, M. P., Puttnam, B. J., Rademacher, G., Luis, R. S., & Zibar, D. (2018). Geometric constellation shaping for fiber optic communication sy stems via end -to-end learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.00774

    2018 arXiv

  83. [87]

    Wang, C., Fu, S., Xiao, Z., Tang, M., & Liu, D. (2019). Long short-term memory neural network (LSTM -NN) enabled accurate optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR) monitoring. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 26

    2019

  84. [88]

    (2019, March)

    Zibar, D., Ferrari, A., Curri, V., & Carena, A. (2019, March). Machine learning-based Raman amplifier design. In Optical Fiber Communication Conference (pp. M1J-1). Optical Society of America

    2019

  85. [89]

    (2019, March)

    Zhong, Z., Hua, N., Yuan, Z., Li, Y., & Zheng, X. (2019, March). Routing without Routing Algorithms: an AI- Based Routing Paradigm for Multi -Domain Optical Networks. In Optical Fiber Communication Conference (pp. Th2A- 24). Optical Society of America

    2019

  86. [90]

    & Xin, X

    Tian, Q., Li, Z., Hu, K., Zhu, L., Pan, X., Zhang, Q., ... & Xin, X. (2018). Turbo-coded 16-ary OAM shift keying FSO communication system combining the CNN-based adaptive demodulator. Optics express, 26(21), 27849-27864

    2018

  87. [91]

    Wang, D., Zhang, M., Li, J., Li, Z., Li, J., Song, C., & Chen, X. (2017). Intelligent constellation diagram analyzer using convolutional neural network-based deep learning. Optics express, 25(15), 17150-17166

    2017

  88. [92]

    Zhang, J., Chen, W., Gao, M., Ma, Y., Zhao, Y., & Shen, G. (2018). Intelligent adaptive coherent optical receiver based on convolutional neural network and clustering algorithm. Optics express, 26(14), 18684-18698

    2018

  89. [93]

    Tanimura, T., Hoshida, T., Kato, T., Watanabe, S., & Morikawa, H. (2019). Convolutional neural network-based optical performance monitoring for optical transport networks. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 11(1), A52-A59

    2019

  90. [94]

    (2019, March)

    Panayiotou, T., Savva, G., Shariati, B., Tomkos, I., & Ellinas, G. (2019, March). Machine Learning for QoT Estimation of Unseen Optical Network States. In Optical Fiber Communication Conference (pp. Tu2E-2). Optical Society of America

    2019

  91. [95]

    R., Fontana, M., Rodriguez-Cobo, L., Lomer, M., & López -Higuera, J

    Cuevas, A. R., Fontana, M., Rodriguez-Cobo, L., Lomer, M., & López -Higuera, J. M. (2018). Machine Learning for Turning Optical Fiber Specklegram Sensor into a Spatially -Resolved Sensing System. Proof of Concept. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 36(17), 3733-3738

    2018

  92. [96]

    Li, J., Zhang, M., Wang, D., Wu, S., & Zhan, Y. (2018). Joint atmospheric turbulence detection and adaptive demodulation technique using the CNN for the OAM-FSO communication. Optics express, 26(8), 10494-10508

    2018

  93. [97]

    I., Guo, K., Zhou, K., Shen, F., Sun, Y.,

    Wang, Z., Dedo, M. I., Guo, K., Zhou, K., Shen, F., Sun, Y., ... & Guo, Z. (2019). Efficient recognition of the propagated orbital angular momentum modes in turbulences with the convolutional neural network. IEEE Photonics Journal

    2019

  94. [98]

    Ma, S., Dai, J., Lu, S., Li, H., Zhang, H., Du, C., & Li, S. (2019). Signal Demodulation With Machine Learning Methods for Physical Layer Visible Light Communications: Prototype Platform, Open Dataset, and Algorithms. IEEE Access, 7, 30588-30598

    2019

  95. [99]

    Wang, K., Yu, X., Xiong, Q., Zhu, Q., Lu, W., Huang, Y., & Zhao, L. (2019). Learning to improve WLAN indoor positioning accuracy based on DBSCAN-KRF algorithm from RSS fingerprint data. IEEE Access

    2019

  96. [100]

    Jiang, L., Yan, L., Yi, A., Pan, Y., Pan, W., & Luo, B. (2018). K-Nearest Neighbor Detector for Enhancing Performance of Optical Phase Conjugation System in the Presence of Nonlinear Phase Noise. IEEE Photonics Journal, 10(2), 1-8

    2018

  97. [101]

    & Luo, B

    Wang, D., Zhang, M., Fu, M., Cai, Z., Li, Z., Han, H., ... & Luo, B. (2016). Nonlinearity mitigation using a machine learning detector based on $ k $-nearest neighbors. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 28(19), 2102-2105

    2016

  98. [102]

    Zhang, J., Gao, M., Chen, W., & Shen, G. (2018). Non-data-aided k-nearest neighbors technique for optical fiber nonlinearity mitigation. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 36(17), 3564-3572

    2018

  99. [103]

    (2017, March)

    Barletta, L., Giusti, A., Rottondi, C., & Tornatore, M. (2017, March). QoT estimation for unestablished lighpaths using machine learning. In Optical Fiber Communication Conference(pp. Th1J-1). Optical Society of America

    2017

  100. [104]

    Rottondi, C., Barletta, L., Giusti, A., & Tornatore, M. (2018). Machine-learning method for quality of transmission prediction of unestablished lightpaths. IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 10(2), A286-A297

    2018

  101. [105]

    Tóth, J., Ovseník, Ľ., Turán, J., Michaeli, L., & Márton, M. (2018). Classification prediction analysis of RSSI parameter in hard switching process for FSO/RF systems. Measurement, 116, 602-610. 27

    2018

  102. [106]

    Sorokina, M., Sygletos, S., & Turitsyn, S. (2016). Sparse identification for nonlinear optical communication systems: SINO method. Optics express, 24(26), 30433-30443

    2016

  103. [107]

    (2017, July)

    Sorokina, M., Sygletos, S., & Turitsyn, S. (2017, July). Sparse Identification for Nonlinear Optical communication systems. In 2017 19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON) (pp. 1-4). IEEE

    2017

  104. [109]

    L., Samadi, P., Cho, P

    Huang, Y., Gutterman, C. L., Samadi, P., Cho, P. B., Samoud, W., Ware, C., ... & Bergman, K. (2017). Dynamic mitigation of EDFA power excursions with machine learning. Optics express, 25(3), 2245-2258

    2017

  105. [110]

    B., Samadi, P., & Bergman, K

    Huang, Y., Cho, P. B., Samadi, P., & Bergman, K. (2017, March). Dynamic power pre-adjustments with machine learning that mitigate EDFA excursions during defragmentation. In 2017 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC)(pp. 1-3). IEEE

    2017

  106. [111]

    B., Samadi, P., & Bergman, K

    Huang, Y., Cho, P. B., Samadi, P., & Bergman, K. (2018). Power excursion mitigation for flexgrid defragmentation with machine learning. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 10(1), A69-A76

    2018

  107. [112]

    Q., & Ha, C

    Tran, H. Q., & Ha, C. (2019). Improved Visible Light-Based Indoor Positioning System Using Machine Learning Classification and Regression. Applied Sciences, 9(6), 1048

    2019

  108. [113]

    Jones, R. T. (2019). Machine Learning Methods in Coherent Optical Communication Systems

    2019

  109. [114]

    Mai, X., Liu, J., Wu, X., Zhang, Q., Guo, C., Yang, Y., & Li, Z. (2017). Stokes space modulation format classification based on non-iterative clustering algorithm for coherent optical receivers. Optics express, 25(3), 2038-2050

    2017

  110. [115]

    Cheng, L., Xi, L., Zhao, D., Tang, X., Zhang, W., & Zhang, X. (2015). Improved modulation format identification based on Stokes parameters using combination of fuzzy c -means and hierarchical clustering i n coherent optical communication system. Chinese Optics Letters, 13(10), 100604

    2015

  111. [116]

    O., & Stavdas, A

    Georgoulakis, K., Matrakidis, C., Glentis, G. O., & Stavdas, A. (2010, June). Fractionally spaced clustering based equalizer for optical channels. In Signal Processing in Photonic Communications (p. SPWC3). Optical Society of America

    2010

  112. [117]

    Torres, J. J. G., Varughese, S., Thomas, V. A., Chiuchiarelli, A., Ralph, S. E., Soto, A. M. C., & González, N. G. (2017). Mitigation of time-varying distortions in Nyquist -WDM systems using machine learning. Optical Fiber Technology, 38, 130-135

    2017

  113. [118]

    Giacoumidis, E., Lin, Y., & Barry, L. P. (2019). DBSCAN for nonlinear equalization in high-capacity multi - carrier optical communications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.01198

    2019 arXiv

  114. [119]

    A., Venkatesan, R., & Alvarado, A

    Amari, A., Lin, X., Dobre, O. A., Venkatesan, R., & Alvarado, A. (2019). A Machine Learning-Based Detection Technique for Optical Fiber Nonlinearity Mitigation. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters

    2019

  115. [120]

    Zhang, J., Chen, W., Gao, M., & Shen, G. (2017). K-means-clustering-based fiber nonlinearity equalization techniques for 64-QAM coherent optical communication system. Optics express, 25(22), 27570-27580

    2017

  116. [121]

    & Chen, J

    Zhang, L., Pang, X., Ozolins, O., Udalcovs, A., Popov, S., Xiao, S., ... & Chen, J. (2018). Spectrally efficient digitized radio-over-fiber system with k-means clustering-based multidimensional quantization. Optics letters, 43(7), 1546- 1549

    2018

  117. [122]

    G., Zibar, D., Yu, X., & Monroy, I

    Gonzalez, N. G., Zibar, D., Yu, X., & Monroy, I. T. (2010, March). Optical phase-modulated radio-over-fiber links wi th k -means algorithm for digital demodulation of 8PSK subcarrier multiplexed signals. In Optical Fiber Communication Conference (p. OML3). Optical Society of America

    2010

  118. [123]

    G., Zibar, D., Caballero, A., & Monroy, I

    Gonzalez, N. G., Zibar, D., Caballero, A., & Monroy, I. T. (2010). Experimental 2.5-Gb/s QPSK WDM Phase- Modulated Radio-Over-Fiber Link With Digital Demodulation by a $ K $-Means Algorithm. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 22(5), 335-337. 28

    2010

  119. [124]

    (2015, November)

    Chen, H., Li, Y., & Shen, G. (2015, November). Planning for passive optical network deployment with K-means clustering-based approach. In Asia Communications and Photonics Conference (pp. AM2E-2). Optical Society of America

    2015

  120. [125]

    Wu, X., & Chi, N. (2019). The phase estimation of geometric shaping 8-QAM modulations based on K -means clustering in underwater visible light communication. Optics Communications

    2019

  121. [126]

    & Chi, N

    Lu, X., Zhou, Y., Qiao, L., Yu, W., Liang, S., Zhao, M., ... & Chi, N. (2019). Amplitude jitter compensation of PAM-8 VLC system employing time-amplitude two -Dimensional re -estimation bas e on density clustering of machine learning. Physica Scripta

    2019

  122. [127]

    Zibar, D., de Carvalho, L. H. H., Piels, M., Doberstein, A., Diniz, J., Nebendahl, B., ... & de Oliveira, J. C. R. (2015). Application of machine learning techniques for amplitude and phase noise characterization. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 33(7), 1333-1343

    2015

  123. [129]

    C., Khan, F

    Tan, M. C., Khan, F. N., Al-Arashi, W. H., Zhou, Y., & Lau, A. P. T. (2014). Simultaneous optical performance monitoring and modulation format/bit -rate identification using principal component analysis. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 6(5), 441-448

    2014

  124. [130]

    Yang, S., Zhang, X., Xi, L., & Lu, C. (2011). Optical network traffic detectional algorithm based on principal component analysis

    2011

  125. [131]

    M., Fanuel, M., & Suykens, J

    Alaíz, C. M., Fanuel, M., & Suykens, J. A. (2018). Convex formulation for kernel PCA and its use in semisupervised learning. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 29(8), 3863-3869

    2018

  126. [132]

    Lu, H., Cui, S., Ke, C., & Liu, D. (2017). Automatic reference optical spectrum retrieval method for ultra-high resolution optical spectrum distortion analysis utilizing integrated machine learning techniques. Optics Express, 25(26), 32491-32503

    2017

  127. [133]

    S., Castañón, G., & Mex -Perera, C

    Razo-Zapata, I. S., Castañón, G., & Mex -Perera, C. (2014). Self-healing in transparent optical packet switching mesh networks: A reinforcement learning perspective. Computer Networks, 60, 129-146

    2014

  128. [134]

    (2007, June)

    Belbekkouche, A., & Hafid, A. (2007, June). An adaptive reinforcement learning-based approach to reduce blocking probability in bufferless OBS networks. In 2007 IEEE International Conference on Communications (pp. 2377- 2382). IEEE

    2007

  129. [135]

    (2008, November)

    Belbekkouche, A., Hafid, A., & Gendreau, M. (2008, November). A reinforcement learning-based deflection routing scheme for buffer -less OBS networks. In IEEE GLOBECOM 2008-2008 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (pp. 1-6). IEEE

    2008

  130. [136]

    (2009, September)

    Belbekkouche, A., Hafid, A., & Gendreau, M. (2009, September). Adaptive Routing and Contention Resolution approaches for OBS networks with QoS differentiation. In 2009 Sixth International Conference on Broadband Communications, Networks, and Systems (pp. 1-8). IEEE

    2009

  131. [137]

    V., Venkatesh, T., & Murthy, C

    Kiran, Y. V., Venkatesh, T., & Murthy, C. S. R. (2009, June). A multi-agent reinforcement learning approach to path selection in optical burst switching n etworks. In 2009 IEEE International Conference on Communications (pp. 1-5). IEEE

    2009

  132. [138]

    (2007, September)

    Pointurier, Y., & Heidari, F. (2007, September). Reinforcement learning based routing in all-optical networks. In 2007 Fourth International Conference on Broadband Communications, Networks and Systems (BROADNETS'07) (pp. 919-921). IEEE

    2007

  133. [139]

    S., Castañon, G., & Mex-Perera, C

    Razo-Zapata, I. S., Castañon, G., & Mex-Perera, C. (2013, June). Lightpath requests processing in flexible packet switching optical networks using reinforcement learning. In 2013 15th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON) (pp. 1-4). IEEE

    2013

  134. [140]

    (2003, June)

    Garcia, P., Zsigri, A., & Guitton, A. (2003, June). A multicast reinforcement learning algorithm for WDM optical networks. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Telecommunications, 2003. ConTEL 2003. (Vol. 2, pp. 419-426). IEEE. 29

    2003

  135. [141]

    Heidari, F., Mannor, S., & Mason, L. G. (2007, May). Reinforcement learning-based load shared sequential routing. In International Conference on Research in Networking (pp. 832-843). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    2007

  136. [142]

    R., Batista, P., Santos, M., Wosinska, L., & Monti, P

    Natalino, C., Raza, M. R., Batista, P., Santos, M., Wosinska, L., & Monti, P. (2018). Machine-learning-based routing of QoS -constrained connectivity services in optical transport networks. Proc. of OSA Advan ced Photonics], NeW3F, 5

    2018

  137. [143]

    Seve, E., Pesic, J., Delezoide, C., Bigo, S., & Pointurier, Y. (2018). Learning process for reducing uncertainties on network parameters and design margins. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 10(2), A298-A306

    2018

  138. [144]

    K., & Avery, K

    Bkassiny, M., Jayaweera, S. K., & Avery, K. A. (2011). Distributed Reinforcement Learning based MAC protocols for autonomous cognitive secondary users. NEW MEXICO UNIV ALBUQUERQUE DEPT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE

    2011

  139. [145]

    Du, Z., Wang, C., Sun, Y., & Wu, G. (2018). Context-Aware Indoor VLC/RF Heterogeneous Network Selection: Reinforcement Learning with Knowledge Transfer. IEEE Access, 6, 33275-33284

    2018

  140. [146]

    V., Venkatesh, T., & Murthy, C

    Kiran, Y. V., Venkatesh, T., & Murthy, C. S. R. (2007). A reinforcement learning framework for path selection and wavelength selection in optical burst switched networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 25(9), 18-26

    2007

  141. [147]

    Haeri, S., Thong, W. W. K., Chen, G., & Trajković, L. (2013, August). A reinforcement learning-based algorithm for deflection routing in optical burst -switched networks. In 2013 IEEE 14th International Conference on Information Reuse & Integration (IRI) (pp. 474-481). IEEE

    2013

  142. [148]

    V., Venkatesh, T., & Murthy, C

    Kiran, Y. V., Venkatesh, T., & Murthy, C. S. R. (2006, October). Reinforcement learning based path selection and wavelength selection in optical burst switched networks. In 2006 3rd International Conference on Broadband Communications, Networks and Systems (pp. 1-8). IEEE

    2006

  143. [149]

    Liu, Y., Yang, Y., Han, P., Shao, Z., & Li, C. (2019). Virtual Network Embedding in Fiber-Wireless Access Networks for Resource-Efficient IoT Service Provisioning. IEEE Access, 7, 65506-65517

    2019

  144. [150]

    Luo, X., Shi, C., Wang, L., Chen, X., Li, Y., & Yang, T. (2019). Leveraging double-agent-based deep reinforcement learning to global optimization of elastic optical networks with enhanced survivability. Optics Express, 27(6), 7896-7911

    2019

  145. [151]

    (2018, May)

    Lu, W., Fang, H., & Zhu, Z. (2018, May). AI-assisted resource advertising and pricing to realize distributed tenant-driven virtual network slicing in inter -DC optical networks. In 2018 International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling (ONDM)(pp. 130-135). IEEE

    2018

  146. [154]

    Rafique, D., & Velasco, L. (2018). Machine learning for network automation: overview, architecture, and applications [Invited Tutorial]. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 10(10), D126-D143

    2018

  147. [155]

    Giacoumidis, E., Lin, Y., Wei, J., Aldaya, I., Tsokanos, A., & Barry, L. (2019). Harnessing machine learning for fiber-induced nonlinearity mitigation in long-haul coherent optical OFDM. Future Internet, 11(1), 2

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.