High Impedance Fault Detection and Isolation in Power Distribution Networks using Support Vector Machines

Abdul Qayyum Khan; Adil Sarwar Khan; Faisal Mehmood; Muhammad Abid; Muhammad Sarwar; Sufi Tabassum Gul

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 40 references

High Impedance Fault Detection and Isolation in Power Distribution Networks using Support Vector Machines

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A multiclass support vector machine trained on bus voltages detects high-impedance faults and locates the faulted section of a distribution feeder, hitting 100% dependability and security in the paper's 400-sample test.

desk verdict Routine SVM application with a fatal evaluation gap: no evidence of a clean train/test split, so the 100% results are likely training-set artifacts. read the letter →

arxiv 1909.10583 v1 pith:I4YE2P7Y submitted 2019-08-09 eess.SY cs.SYeess.SP

Muhammad Sarwar , Faisal Mehmood , Muhammad Abid , Abdul Qayyum Khan , Sufi Tabassum Gul , Adil Sarwar Khan This is my paper · ORCID

classification eess.SYcs.SYeess.SP

keywords HighImpedanceFaultSupportVectorMachineMulticlassSVMDetectionLocationPrincipalComponentAnalysisFisherDiscriminant13-nodedistributionfeeder

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

High-impedance faults draw current well below normal load levels, so conventional overcurrent protection misses most of them, and their arcing signatures resemble load and capacitor switching. This paper tries to show that a data-driven classifier can solve both problems at once. Using bus-voltage observations from a simulated 13-node distribution feeder, the authors train a multiclass support vector machine to distinguish the healthy state from high-impedance faults at three locations. They report that the classifier detects every fault and never mistakes a non-fault event for one, giving 100% dependability and 100% security, and that it keeps this accuracy when loads vary and capacitors switch. If true, existing voltage and current sensors plus a numerical relay could detect and isolate these faults without new hardware or signal injection.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the multiclass support vector machine (M-SVM), a supervised classifier that separates data classes with a maximum-margin hyperplane in a kernel feature space; here it uses a Gaussian radial-basis kernel with $\sigma = 0.5$ and penalty $C = 10$, labeling four classes (healthy plus three fault locations). It runs directly on 29-dimensional bus-voltage measurements, so no separate feature extraction is needed. For comparison the paper also uses principal component analysis with the $T^2$ statistic for detection and Fisher discriminant analysis with its discriminant function for classification; M-SVM is the mechanism that carries the simultaneous detect-and-locate claim.

What would settle it

Run the trained M-SVM on voltage measurements from staged high-impedance faults on a real distribution feeder, with load and capacitor-switching events included; any missed fault lowers dependability below 100%, and any trip on a switching transient lowers security below 100%.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that multiclass support vector machines outperform both principal component analysis and Fisher discriminant analysis for high-impedance fault diagnosis: PCA detects the fault but cannot tell fault locations apart, FDA can locate faults, and M-SVM both detects and locates them with perfect scores. The result is obtained by training on 29 bus-voltage variables from a 13-node distribution feeder model, with a Gaussian radial-basis kernel and a cross-validated penalty factor, and testing on 400 observations covering the normal state and three fault positions. The paper also claims the classifier keeps its perfect accuracy under load variation and capacitor switching, and that it can be implemented as a numerical relay using measurements already available in distribution networks.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the two-diode simulation model reproduces real high-impedance arc behavior, since all 400 training and test samples come from that single model.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A protective relay could use the existing voltage and current measurements to trip on high-impedance faults without injecting any test signal, so power quality is not degraded.
Load changes and capacitor switching will not trigger false trips, because the classifier was tested on those transients.
The faulted section can be identified, not just the presence of a fault, which enables targeted isolation rather than shutting down the whole feeder.
The M-SVM result matches the 100% dependability and security of mathematical-morphology methods while outperforming wavelet, time-frequency, and morphological-gradient methods in the comparison table.
The classifiers are low-order and computationally light, so they can run on embedded numerical-relay hardware.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: because all 400 samples come from one two-diode simulation model, the 100% figures measure separation on that model; real-world performance should be expected to drop unless the model's randomness matches staged-fault data.
Editorial inference: the approach naturally extends to other feeder topologies and more fault locations, but the training data would need to cover those cases; nothing in the paper shows transfer across networks.
Editorial inference: a strong testable extension is to feed the trained classifier with recorded staged-fault voltage waveforms; if the arc's real randomness differs from the simulation, accuracy will reveal it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Short version: this is a competent write-up of a routine machine-learning exercise, but the reported 100% numbers are not believable because the paper never establishes that test samples were withheld from training. The stress-test note is on target.

What is actually new: applying multiclass SVM (RBF kernel) to locate three HIF positions on the IEEE 13-node feeder, alongside PCA and FDA baselines. The methods are textbook and the comparison is not novel. Credit where due: the simulation model follows Brahma's HIF model, the description of PCA/FDA/SVM is accurate, and the paper is clearly organized.

The soft spots are load-bearing. Section 4 says 400 observations: 100 normal, 300 faulty across three locations. Section 4.1 says training uses 60 normal samples and testing uses 100 normal samples—that is only possible if test and training sets overlap, since only 100 normal samples exist. Section 4.3 states the SVM was 'validated on training data,' which is invalid as a generalization check. Section 4.4 tests 50 observations per class (200 total) but the data set has only 100 normal samples; again, overlap or repeat runs are the only way to get 50 normal test samples. So the 100% security/dependability could easily be the classifier memorizing the simulation runs, and the paper does not rule that out.

The robustness claim is even thinner. The abstract and conclusion say the method handles load variation and capacitor switching, but no such experiment is described anywhere in Section 4. Table 1 compares performance indices without listing operating conditions, so the comparison is not meaningful.

The HIF model itself is a single source-diode-resistance model with parameters 'tuned according to test feeder.' That is fine for a proof of concept, but it undercuts the claim to detect 'all types' of HIF. No staged-fault data, no code/data release, no error bars.

All of this adds up to a conditional proof of concept, not a validated protection scheme. The paper is readable and the basic pipeline is sensible, so it could be useful as a starting point for a student or a literature review. But the central claim as written is not supported. I would desk-reject this version, with an invitation to resubmit using a properly specified non-overlapping train/test split, cross-validated final results, and at least one scenario with load/capacitor disturbance actually reported.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a data-driven scheme for detecting and locating high impedance faults (HIFs) in power distribution networks. It applies Principal Component Analysis with Hotelling's T2 statistics, Fisher Discriminant Analysis, binary Support Vector Machines, and Multiclass Support Vector Machines to bus voltage data from a simulated IEEE 13-node feeder. The HIF is modeled with the Brahma two-diode source-resistance model. The authors report that PCA detects HIFs but cannot classify them, FDA can both detect and locate faults, and M-SVM achieves 100% security and 100% dependability, with claims of robustness under load variation and capacitor switching.

Significance. If the reported results are valid, the proposed approach would be practically attractive because it uses measurements from existing CTs and PTs, does not require signal injection, and is computationally light enough for embedded relay implementation. The manuscript gives a clear description of the algorithmic pipeline, uses a recognized test feeder, and compares against earlier HIF detection methods in Table 1. However, the significance is currently limited by the simulation-only validation, the absence of a documented independent test set, and the lack of experiments supporting the robustness claims. The paper does not provide code or data, so reproducibility of the exact 100% figures cannot be independently checked.

major comments (4)

[Section 4, especially §4.1, §4.3, and §4.4] The evaluation protocol does not establish an independent test set. The dataset is described in §4 as containing 100 normal observations and 300 fault observations, but §4.1 trains PCA on 60 normal samples and tests on 100 normal samples plus 100 faulty samples; §4.3 states that SVM classifiers were "validated on training data"; and §4.4 tests 50 observations per class without stating that these observations were withheld during training. If the test samples overlap the training samples, or are temporally adjacent samples from the same simulation runs, the reported 100% dependability and security only show that the classifier memorized the training data. Please specify the exact train/test split and rerun the evaluation with disjoint samples, ideally with repeated stratified cross-validation and confidence intervals.
[§4.4, Table 1, and Section 5] The conclusion that M-SVM is "robust against capacitor and load switching transients" is not supported by any experiment described in the paper. No load-variation or capacitor-switching scenario is reported in Section 4, and Table 1 lists only security and dependability percentages without any description of the operating conditions tested. Either add experiments that explicitly vary load and include capacitor switching, with results, or remove this robustness claim from the abstract, Section 4.4, and the conclusion.
[§2.2 and §4] All training and test data are generated from a single HIF model, the Brahma two-diode model, with parameters Vp, Vn, Rp, and Rn that are said to be "tuned according to test feeder" but are not validated against staged-fault or field data. The reported perfect scores therefore mainly demonstrate that the classifier separates samples of this particular simulation model. To support the paper's claim of detecting "all types of HIF," validation on independent HIF data—for example, staged-fault recordings or a structurally different HIF model—is needed, or the claims must be explicitly limited to the modeled fault characteristics.
[§4.4] The M-SVM result is reported as 100% on 200 test observations (50 per class) with fixed hyperparameters (Gaussian RBF kernel with sigma = 0.5, penalty factor 10, regularization parameter lambda = 1) and no sensitivity analysis or uncertainty quantification. Because the test set is small and the hyperparameters are tuned on the same simulated data, the 100% figure should be accompanied by confidence intervals, repeated cross-validation results, or a sensitivity study over hyperparameter values before it can support the strength of the central claim.

minor comments (7)

[§3.1, Eq. (1)] Equation (1) writes 1/sqrt(1-n) X = U Sigma V^T; the sign under the square root is presumably a typo, and the expression should be 1/sqrt(n-1) X = U Sigma V^T.
[§3.2, Eq. (12)] The denominator in Eq. (12) is n(n-1), but consistency with Eq. (4) suggests it should be n(n-a); please check the formula and the degrees of freedom.
[Abstract and §4] The abstract says data from voltage and current sensors are used, but the input matrix in §4 is described only in terms of 29 bus voltage variables; clarify whether current measurements are actually used or remove the reference to current sensors.
[Throughout] The name of the statistic is misspelled as "Hotteling's" in several places; the standard spelling is "Hotelling's."
[Section 1] The introduction refers to "Section II," "Section III," etc., but the actual sections are numbered 1 through 5; renumber the cross-references.
[Table 1] Table 1 compares the proposed method with prior methods without stating the test conditions, data sources, or fault scenarios used for each entry; without common test conditions, the comparison should be interpreted cautiously.
[Figure 19] The caption says the M-SVM predicted labels are shown on a 2-D plane, but no projection method for the 29-dimensional data is described in §4.4; please clarify how the 2-D plot was obtained.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No definitional circularity: the SVM/FDA/PCA results are empirical accuracy claims on simulated data, not derivations from the HIF model; the reported evaluation gaps are validation-evidence concerns, not circular reductions.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that M-SVM detects and locates HIFs with 100% dependability and security on an IEEE 13-node simulation. This is an empirical claim evaluated by classifying observations; the classifier output is not algebraically forced by the HIF model or by the training data unless the test set overlaps the training set, and the paper does not state such an overlap. Section 4.3's phrase 'validated on training data' is an evaluation-protocol weakness, but it is not the basis of the M-SVM result in Section 4.4, which classifies '50 observations of each data class' as test data. The HIF model parameters in Section 2.2 are tuned to the test feeder, but tuning a simulation model does not by construction determine the SVM's hold-out labels. The two references to prior work by the same group (Adil et al., 2016 and Jamil et al., 2015) support generic methodological choices and do not carry the load of the central claim. The paper's lack of a documented train/test split, the absence of described load-variation/capacitor-switching experiments, and the reliance on a single simulation model are external-validity and reproducibility issues, not circularity. Therefore score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All entries above are assumptions or choices the reader must grant before the 100% accuracy result is meaningful. The largest burden is the HIF model fidelity assumption, because every data sample is generated from that model.

free parameters (9)

HIF model positive DC source voltage Vp = 1.0 kV with ±10% random variation
Section 2.2; value tuned to test feeder, not obtained from staged-fault measurements.
HIF model negative DC source voltage Vn = 0.5 kV with ±10% random variation
Section 2.2; same tuning issue.
HIF arc resistances Rp and Rn = 1000 to 1500 ohms with random variation
Section 2.2; chosen to mimic arc behavior, not measured.
Number of retained principal components = 5
Section 4.1; chosen to capture 98% of variance, a user decision.
PCA significance level alpha = 0.001
Section 4.1; user-chosen threshold level.
SVM penalty factor C = Selected by nested 3-fold CV over 1000 values from 0.1 to 100
Section 4.3; fitted to the simulation data.
RBF kernel scaling sigma = 0.5
Section 4.4; stated without search or sensitivity analysis.
M-SVM penalty factor = 10
Section 4.4; stated without tuning rationale.
Regularization parameter lambda = 1
Section 4.4; stated without tuning rationale.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption The Brahma 2013 two-diode HIF model with parameters Vp=1.0 kV, Vn=0.5 kV, Rp/Rn=1000-1500 Ohms accurately represents real high impedance faults.
Section 2.2 states parameters are 'tuned according to test feeder' and uses this model to produce all training and test data; if the model is not faithful, the central result is an artifact.
domain assumption Voltage measurements at the IEEE 13-node feeder (29 variables) contain sufficient information to detect and locate HIFs.
Section 4 builds the input matrix from bus voltages only, yet the abstract mentions voltage and current sensors; no feature selection or physical justification is offered.
domain assumption Simulation results on one feeder generalize to real distribution networks.
The paper draws conclusions about reliability and dependability of distribution networks from a single simulated case study.
standard math Standard linear algebra and statistical results for PCA, FDA, and SVM, including the F-distribution threshold, hold as used.
Section 3 relies on textbook PCA, FDA, and SVM derivations without proof; these are standard.
ad hoc to paper Training and test observations are independent and drawn from the same distribution.
The paper never defines a disjoint split; Section 4.1 uses 60 normal samples for training and 100 normal samples for testing, which appears to overlap.
ad hoc to paper A Gaussian RBF kernel with sigma=0.5 and penalty factor 10 is adequate for HIF classification.
Section 4.4 fixes these values without a search or sensitivity analysis.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High Impedance Fault Detection and Isolation in Power Distribution Networks using Support Vector Machines." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/I4YE2P7Y

@misc{pith2026190910583,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High Impedance Fault Detection and Isolation in Power Distribution Networks using Support Vector Machines},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/I4YE2P7Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1909.10583}
}

read the original abstract

This paper proposes an accurate High Impedance Fault (HIF) detection and isolation scheme in a power distribution network. The proposed schemes utilize the data available from voltage and current sensors. The technique employs multiple algorithms consisting of Principal Component Analysis, Fisher Discriminant Analysis, Binary and Multiclass Support Vector Machine for detection and identification of the high impedance fault. These data driven techniques have been tested on IEEE 13-node distribution network for detection and identification of high impedance faults with broken and unbroken conductor. Further, the robustness of machine learning techniques has also been analysed by examining their performance with variation in loads for different faults. Simulation results for different faults at various locations have shown that proposed methods are fast and accurate in diagnosing high impedance faults. Multiclass Support Vector Machine gives the best result to detect and locate High Impedance Fault accurately. It ensures reliability, security and dependability of the distribution network.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1909.10583 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** The selected HIF model (Brahma, 2013) • Build up: Current magnitude progressively increases till it reaches it maximum value (Biswal, 2017) • Randomness: Magnitude of HIF current and its shape changes with time due change in impedance of conducting path (Sykulski, 2006). • Low and high frequency components: HIF current includes low frequency components due to non-linearity of HIF. Additionally, HIF current also co… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** The v-i characteristics of HIF Vp = 1.0 kv, with ± 10% variation Vn = 0.5 kv, with ± 10% variation Rp, Rn = 1000 Ω − 1500 Ω, with random variation The above model is simulated in Matlab R . There are two steps involved in modelling HIF; in first step, variable DC voltage sources are modelled using controlled voltages source; in second step, variable resistances are modelled using controlled current sources. First p… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Flowchart for offline fault computation using PCA Once the data is projected in lower dimensions, Hotteling’s T 2 statistics is used for fault detection. Hotteling’s T 2 - statistics can be calculated as (Jamil et al., 2015; Chiang et al., 2000), T 2 = x T PΣ −1 a P T x (3) where Σ is the diagonal matrix of first a singular values, P is the loading vector matrix corresponding to first a singular values. The Hotteli… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (10 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Flowchart for online fault computation using PCA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Linear separating hyperplane (Nayak, 1998) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Flowchart for offline training of FDA Where b, the bias, x, the data points, and w, the weighting vector, are obtained through training data. In two-dimensional space, the discriminant function is a line, in three-dimensional space, the discriminant function is a plane…

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: Projection of training data and testing in two dimensional space for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png]

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: The results of Hotteling’s T 2 statistics to detect HIF data and 100 samples of faulty data. PCA algorithm has been applied on training data and 29 principal components are obtained. Out of 29 principal components only 5 principal components have been retained, the …

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: Projection of training data in two dimensional space by FDA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_14.png]

**Figure 15.** Figure 15: Plot of discriminant function for multiple HIF detection using FDA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_15.png]

**Figure 16.** Figure 16: Zoomed view of discriminant function for multiple HIF detection using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_16.png]

**Figure 18.** Figure 18: Predicted labels of test data using Multiclass–SVM classifier [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_18.png]

**Figure 19.** Figure 19: Predicted labels of test data using M–SVM classifier on a 2-D plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_19.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

[1]

High impedance fault detection on distribution feeders

Adamiak, M., Wester, C., Thakur, M., Jensen, C., 2006. High impedance fault detection on distribution feeders. GE Industrial solutions

work page 2006
[2]

Comparison of PCA and FDA for monitoring of coupled liquid tank system,

Adil, M., Abid, M., Khan, A.Q., 2016. Comparison of PCA and FDA for monitoring of coupled liquid tank system,. Pakistan

work page 2016
[3]

High impedance fault location in 11 kv underground distribution systems using wavelet transforms,

Bakar, A.H.A., Ali, M.S., Tan, C., Mokhlis, H., Arof, H., Illias, H.A., 2014. High impedance fault location in 11 kv underground distribution systems using wavelet transforms,. Electrical Power and Energy Systems 55, 723– 730

work page 2014
[4]

A comparison of measured high impedance fault data to digital computer modeling results,

Bishop, R.E.L.M.T., 1985. A comparison of measured high impedance fault data to digital computer modeling results,. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems 104, 2754–2758

work page 1985
[5]

Detection of high impedance fault in distribution sys- tem considering distributed generation,

Biswal, A.P.K.T., 2017. Detection of high impedance fault in distribution sys- tem considering distributed generation,. Bangalore, India

work page 2017
[6]

Detection of high impedance fault in power distri- bution systems using mathematical morphology,

Brahma, S.G.S.M., 2013. Detection of high impedance fault in power distri- bution systems using mathematical morphology,. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS 28, 1226–1234

work page 2013
[7]

A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition,

Burges, C.J.C., 1997. A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition,. Kluwer Academic Boston

work page 1997
[8]

De- tection of high impedance faults using current transformers for sensing and identiﬁcation based on features extracted using wavelet transform

Chen, J., Phung, T., Blackburn, T., Ambikairajah, E., Zhang, D., 2016. De- tection of high impedance faults using current transformers for sensing and identiﬁcation based on features extracted using wavelet transform. IET gen- eration, transmission & distribution 10, 2990–2998

work page 2016

Show all 40 references

[9]

Study on High Impedance Fault Arcing Current Characteristics,

Chen, J.C., Phung, B.T., Zhang, D.M., Blackbur, T., 2013. Study on High Impedance Fault Arcing Current Characteristics,. TAS, AustraliA, Hobart

2013
[10]

Advanced Textbooks in Control and Signal Processing

Chiang, L., Russel, E., Braatz, R., 2000. Advanced Textbooks in Control and Signal Processing. Springer New York

2000
[11]

Data-driven Design of Fault Diagnosis and Fault-tolerant Control Systems

Ding, S.X., 2014. Data-driven Design of Fault Diagnosis and Fault-tolerant Control Systems. Duisburg,Germany: Springer

2014
[12]

A novel selectivity tech- nique for high impedance arcing fault detection in compensated mv net- works,

Elkalashy, N.I., Lehtonen, M., Darwish, H.A., 2007. A novel selectivity tech- nique for high impedance arcing fault detection in compensated mv net- works,. EUROPEAN TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRICAL POWER 18, 344–363

2007
[13]

High-impedance fault detection using multi-resolution signal decomposition and adaptive neural fuzzy inference system

Etemadi, A., Sanaye-Pasand, M., 2008. High-impedance fault detection using multi-resolution signal decomposition and adaptive neural fuzzy inference system. IET generation, transmission & distribution 2, 110–118

2008
[14]

High impedance fault detection utilizing real-time complexity measurement,

Ferdowsi, F., Vahedi, H., Edrington, C.S., 2017. High impedance fault detection utilizing real-time complexity measurement,. TX, USA

2017
[15]

Detection of high impedance fault in power distribution systems using mathematical morphology

Gautam, S., Brahma, S.M., 2012. Detection of high impedance fault in power distribution systems using mathematical morphology. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 28, 1226–1234

2012
[16]

High impedance fault detection: A review,

Ghaderi, A., Ginn, H.L., Mohammadpour, H.A., 2016. High impedance fault detection: A review,. Electric Power Systems Research 143, 376–388

2016
[17]

Detection of High-Impedance Faults in Power Distribution Systems,

Hou, D., 2007. Detection of High-Impedance Faults in Power Distribution Systems,

2007
[18]

Fault diagnosis of pakistan research reactor-2 with data-driven techniques,

Jamil, F., Abid, M., Haq, I., Khan, Q.A., Iqbal, M., 2015. Fault diagnosis of pakistan research reactor-2 with data-driven techniques,. Annals of Nuclear Energy 90, 433–440

2015
[19]

High impedance fault detection implementation is- sues,

Jones, B.M.A.R.H., 1996. High impedance fault detection implementation is- sues,. IEEE 11, 139

1996
[20]

Detection and identiﬁcation of high impedance faults in single wire earth return distribution networks,

Kavi, M., Mishra, Y ., Vilathgamuwa, D.M., 2016. Detection and identiﬁcation of high impedance faults in single wire earth return distribution networks,

2016
[21]

High-impedance fault detec- tion using discrete wavelet transform and frequency range and rms conver- sion,

Lai, T.M., Snider, L.A., Lo, E., Sutanto, D., 2005. High-impedance fault detec- tion using discrete wavelet transform and frequency range and rms conver- sion,. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER DELIVERY 20, 397–407. Lima, ´E.M., dos Santos Junqueira, C.M., Brito, N.S.D., de Souza, B...

2005
[22]

A transient based approach to diagnose high impedance faults on smart distribution networks

Lopes, F.V ., Santos, W.C., Fernandes, D., Neves, W.L., 2013. A transient based approach to diagnose high impedance faults on smart distribution networks

2013
[23]

Detection of high impedance faults in medium voltage distribution networks,

Mai, W., Phung, B.T., Ambikairajah, E., 2012. Detection of high impedance faults in medium voltage distribution networks,. Vietnam

2012
[24]

Support vector machines and machine learning on docu- ments,

Nayak, C.M.P., 1998. Support vector machines and machine learning on docu- ments,. In Introduction to information Retrieval

1998
[25]

A method to detect high impedance faults in distribution feeders, in: 2014 IEEE PES T&D Conference and Exposition, IEEE

Sahoo, S., Baran, M.E., 2014. A method to detect high impedance faults in distribution feeders, in: 2014 IEEE PES T&D Conference and Exposition, IEEE. pp. 1–6

2014
[26]

High impedance fault detection in power distribution networks using time–frequency transform and proba- bilistic neural network

Samantaray, S., Panigrahi, B., Dash, P., 2008. High impedance fault detection in power distribution networks using time–frequency transform and proba- bilistic neural network. IET generation, transmission & distribution 2, 261– 270

2008
[27]

Ensemble decision trees for high impedance fault de- tection in power distribution network,

Samantaray, S.R., 2012. Ensemble decision trees for high impedance fault de- tection in power distribution network,. Electrical Power and Energy Systems 43, 1048–1055

2012
[28]

High-impedance fault iden- tiﬁcation on distribution networks,

Santos, W.C., Lopes, F.V ., Brito, N.S.D., 2017. High-impedance fault iden- tiﬁcation on distribution networks,. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER DELIVERY 32, 23–32

2017
[29]

High impedance fault detection using combi- nation of multi-layer perceptron neural networks based on multi-resolution morphological gradient features of current waveform

Sarlak, M., Shahrtash, S., 2011. High impedance fault detection using combi- nation of multi-layer perceptron neural networks based on multi-resolution morphological gradient features of current waveform. IET generation, trans- mission & distribution 5, 588–595

2011
[30]

Soft computing applications in high impedance fault detection in distribution systems,

Sedighi, A.R., Haghifam, M.R., Malik, O.P., 2005. Soft computing applications in high impedance fault detection in distribution systems,. Electric Power Systems Research 76, 136–144

2005
[31]

A fuzzy rule base approach for high impedance fault detection in distribution system using morphology gradi- ent ﬁlter

Sekar, K., Mohanty, N.K., 2018. A fuzzy rule base approach for high impedance fault detection in distribution system using morphology gradi- ent ﬁlter. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences

2018
[32]

High-impedance fault detection using wavelet transform,

Sheelvant, B.P.P.V .R., 2015. High-impedance fault detection using wavelet transform,. International Journal of Engineering Research and General Sci- ence 3, 166–172

2015
[33]

Ground alert: Reliable detection of high-impedance fault caused by downed conductor

Stoupis, J., Maharsi, M., Nuqui, R., 2004. Ground alert: Reliable detection of high-impedance fault caused by downed conductor. ABB Review, Jan

2004
[34]

Modelling arcing high impedances faults in relation to the physical processes in the electric arc,, Lisbon, Portugal

Sykulski, N.Z.J.K., 2006. Modelling arcing high impedances faults in relation to the physical processes in the electric arc,, Lisbon, Portugal

2006
[35]

Modeling and de- tection of high impedance faults,

Torres, V ., Guardado, J.L., Ruiz, H.F., Maximov, S., 2014. Modeling and de- tection of high impedance faults,. Electrical Power and Energy Systems 61, 163–172

2014
[36]

Multi-Class Support Vector Machine in Support Vector Machines Applications

Xue, Z.W.X., 2014. Multi-Class Support Vector Machine in Support Vector Machines Applications. Springer

2014
[37]

A comparison study of basic data-driven fault diagnosis and process monitoring methods on the benchmark tennessee eastman process

Yin, S., Ding, S.X., Haghani, A., Hao, H., Zhang, P., 2012. A comparison study of basic data-driven fault diagnosis and process monitoring methods on the benchmark tennessee eastman process. Journal of Process Control 22, 1567–1581

2012
[38]

High impedance fault detection of distribution network by phasor measurement units,, Tehran, Iran

Zanjani, M.G.M., Kargar, K.H., Zanjani, M.G.M., 2012. High impedance fault detection of distribution network by phasor measurement units,, Tehran, Iran. pp. 2–3

2012
[39]

A New Multi-class Classiﬁcation Algorithm of Support Vector Machine,

Zhang, Y .Z.Y ., 2010. A New Multi-class Classiﬁcation Algorithm of Support Vector Machine,. Guangzhou, China

2010
[40]

Arcing faults detection on overhead lines from the voltage signals

Zoric, K.J., Djuric, M.B., V , V ., 1997. Arcing faults detection on overhead lines from the voltage signals. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems 19, 299–303. 10

1997

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

High impedance fault detection on distribution feeders

Adamiak, M., Wester, C., Thakur, M., Jensen, C., 2006. High impedance fault detection on distribution feeders. GE Industrial solutions

work page 2006

[2] [2]

Comparison of PCA and FDA for monitoring of coupled liquid tank system,

Adil, M., Abid, M., Khan, A.Q., 2016. Comparison of PCA and FDA for monitoring of coupled liquid tank system,. Pakistan

work page 2016

[3] [3]

High impedance fault location in 11 kv underground distribution systems using wavelet transforms,

Bakar, A.H.A., Ali, M.S., Tan, C., Mokhlis, H., Arof, H., Illias, H.A., 2014. High impedance fault location in 11 kv underground distribution systems using wavelet transforms,. Electrical Power and Energy Systems 55, 723– 730

work page 2014

[4] [4]

A comparison of measured high impedance fault data to digital computer modeling results,

Bishop, R.E.L.M.T., 1985. A comparison of measured high impedance fault data to digital computer modeling results,. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems 104, 2754–2758

work page 1985

[5] [5]

Detection of high impedance fault in distribution sys- tem considering distributed generation,

Biswal, A.P.K.T., 2017. Detection of high impedance fault in distribution sys- tem considering distributed generation,. Bangalore, India

work page 2017

[6] [6]

Detection of high impedance fault in power distri- bution systems using mathematical morphology,

Brahma, S.G.S.M., 2013. Detection of high impedance fault in power distri- bution systems using mathematical morphology,. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS 28, 1226–1234

work page 2013

[7] [7]

A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition,

Burges, C.J.C., 1997. A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition,. Kluwer Academic Boston

work page 1997

[8] [8]

De- tection of high impedance faults using current transformers for sensing and identiﬁcation based on features extracted using wavelet transform

Chen, J., Phung, T., Blackburn, T., Ambikairajah, E., Zhang, D., 2016. De- tection of high impedance faults using current transformers for sensing and identiﬁcation based on features extracted using wavelet transform. IET gen- eration, transmission & distribution 10, 2990–2998

work page 2016