Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Antimagic orientations of graphs with given independence number

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1909.10928 v2 pith:6MHVHQ5V submitted 2019-09-23 math.CO

classification math.CO
keywords graphsantimagicarcsconjectureorientationorientationsaforementionedgiven
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Given a digraph $D$ with $m$ arcs and a bijection $\tau: A(D)\rightarrow \{1, 2, \ldots, m\}$, we say $(D, \tau)$ is an antimagic orientation of a graph $G$ if $D$ is an orientation of $G$ and no two vertices in $D$ have the same vertex-sum under $\tau$, where the vertex-sum of a vertex $u$ in $D$ under $\tau$ is the sum of labels of all arcs entering $u$ minus the sum of labels of all arcs leaving $u$. Hefetz, M\"{u}tze, and Schwartz in 2010 initiated the study of antimagic orientations of graphs, and conjectured that every connected graph admits an antimagic orientation. This conjecture seems hard, and few related results are known. However, it has been verified to be true for regular graphs, biregular bipartite graphs, and graphs with large maximum degree. In this paper, we establish more evidence for the aforementioned conjecture by studying antimagic orientations of graphs $G$ with independence number at least $|V(G)|/2$ or at most four. We obtain several results. The method we develop in this paper may shed some light on attacking the aforementioned conjecture.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools