Pith. sign in

REVIEW

A thermal bonding method for manufacturing Micromegas detectors

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1910.03170 v3 pith:CNKACQVY submitted 2019-10-08 physics.ins-det

classification physics.ins-det
keywords methodmicromegasdetectorsdetectorwerebondingbuiltbulk
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

For manufacturing Micromegas detectors, the "bulk" method based on photoetching, was successfully developed and widely used in nuclear and particle physics experiments. However, the complexity of the method requires a considerable number of advanced instruments and processing, limiting the accessibility of this method for production of Micromegas detectors. In view of these limitations with the bulk method, a new method based on thermal bonding technique (TBM) has been developed to manufacture Micromegas detectors in a much simplified and efficient way without etching. This paper describes the TBM in detail and presents performance of the Micromegas detectors built with the TBM. The effectiveness of this method was investigated by testing Micromegas detector prototypes built with the method. Both X-rays and electron beams were used to characterize the prototypes in a gas mixture of argon and CO2 (7%). A typical energy resolution of ~16% (full width at half maximum, FWHM) and an absolute gain greater than 10^4 were obtained with 5.9 keV X-rays. Detection efficiency greater than 98% and a spatial resolution of ~65 {\mu}m were achieved using a 5 GeV electron beam at the DESY test-beam facility. The gas gain of a Micromegas detector could reach up to 10^5 with a uniformity of better than 10% when the size of the avalanche gap was optimized thanks to the flexibility of the TBM in defining the gap. Additionally, the TBM facilitates the exploration of new detector structures based on Micromegas owing to the much-simplified operation with the method.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools