REVIEW 4 cited by
Bayesian Symbolic Regression
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Interpretability is crucial for machine learning in many scenarios such as quantitative finance, banking, healthcare, etc. Symbolic regression (SR) is a classic interpretable machine learning method by bridging X and Y using mathematical expressions composed of some basic functions. However, the search space of all possible expressions grows exponentially with the length of the expression, making it infeasible for enumeration. Genetic programming (GP) has been traditionally and commonly used in SR to search for the optimal solution, but it suffers from several limitations, e.g. the difficulty in incorporating prior knowledge; overly-complicated output expression and reduced interpretability etc. To address these issues, we propose a new method to fit SR under a Bayesian framework. Firstly, Bayesian model can naturally incorporate prior knowledge (e.g., preference of basis functions, operators and raw features) to improve the efficiency of fitting SR. Secondly, to improve interpretability of expressions in SR, we aim to capture concise but informative signals. To this end, we assume the expected signal has an additive structure, i.e., a linear combination of several concise expressions, whose complexity is controlled by a well-designed prior distribution. In our setup, each expression is characterized by a symbolic tree, and the proposed SR model could be solved by sampling symbolic trees from the posterior distribution using an efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm. Finally, compared with GP, the proposed BSR(Bayesian Symbolic Regression) method saves computer memory with no need to keep an updated 'genome pool'. Numerical experiments show that, compared with GP, the solutions of BSR are closer to the ground truth and the expressions are more concise. Meanwhile we find the solution of BSR is robust to hyper-parameter specifications such as the number of trees.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Probabilistic Symbolic Regression for Equation Discovery via Operator-induced and Regularized Symbolic Forests
A hierarchical Bayesian symbolic regression framework (HierBOSSS) with tree-based expression priors, Occam-window model selection, and posterior concentration rates at near-parametric and near-minimax speeds.
-
VaSST: Variational Inference for Symbolic Regression using Soft Symbolic Trees
VaSST uses variational inference over continuously relaxed symbolic trees to recover closed-form expressions from noisy data, reporting competitive structural recovery and predictive accuracy on simulated and Feynman ...
-
Dimension Reduction for Symbolic Regression
A beam search over small expression DAGs, validated by functional dependence measures, reduces the variable count of symbolic regression problems and boosts recovery rates of existing algorithms.
-
Bridging the Domain Gap in Equation Distillation with Reinforcement Feedback
Reinforcement learning fine-tuning with numerical fitness rewards improves equation discovery accuracy and noise robustness of a pretrained symbolic regression transformer.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.