REVIEW 1 cited by
Faster Parallel Algorithm for Approximate Shortest Path
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
We present the first $m\,\text{polylog}(n)$ work, $\text{polylog}(n)$ time algorithm in the PRAM model that computes $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate single-source shortest paths on weighted, undirected graphs. This improves upon the breakthrough result of Cohen~[JACM'00] that achieves $O(m^{1+\epsilon_0})$ work and $\text{polylog}(n)$ time. While most previous approaches, including Cohen's, leveraged the power of hopsets, our algorithm builds upon the recent developments in \emph{continuous optimization}, studying the shortest path problem from the lens of the closely-related \emph{minimum transshipment} problem. To obtain our algorithm, we demonstrate a series of near-linear work, polylogarithmic-time reductions between the problems of approximate shortest path, approximate transshipment, and $\ell_1$-embeddings, and establish a recursive algorithm that cycles through the three problems and reduces the graph size on each cycle. As a consequence, we also obtain faster parallel algorithms for approximate transshipment and $\ell_1$-embeddings with polylogarithmic distortion. The minimum transshipment algorithm in particular improves upon the previous best $m^{1+o(1)}$ work sequential algorithm of Sherman~[SODA'17]. To improve readability, the paper is almost entirely self-contained, save for several staple theorems in algorithms and combinatorics.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Distributed Sparsest Cut via Eigenvalue Estimation
A CONGEST algorithm estimates graph conductance to a sqrt(2.01) factor in O(log^2 n / phi) rounds by approximating Laplacian eigenvalues with the power method.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.