Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Parallel multilevel constructions for constant dimension codes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1911.01878 v1 pith:LMVOAUYF submitted 2019-11-05 math.CO

classification math.CO
keywords codesboundcdcsconstructiondeltagivengrmcsmultilevel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Constant dimension codes (CDCs), as special subspace codes, have received a lot of attention due to their application in random network coding. This paper introduces a family of new codes, called rank metric codes with given ranks (GRMCs), to generalize the parallel construction in [Xu and Chen, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, 64 (2018), 6315--6319] and the classic multilevel construction. A Singleton-like upper bound and a lower bound for GRMCs derived from Gabidulin codes are given. Via GRMCs, two effective constructions for CDCs are presented by combining the parallel construction and the multilevel construction. Many CDCs with larger size than the previously best known codes are given. The ratio between the new lower bound and the known upper bound for $(4\delta,2\delta,2\delta)_q$-CDCs is calculated. It is greater than 0.99926 for any prime power $q$ and any $\delta\geq 3$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. New Constructions of Subspace Codes Using Subsets of MRD codes in Several Blocks

    cs.IT 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Parallel versions of the linkage construction and of multi-block lifted MRD codes yield new lower bounds on A_q(n,d,k), beating the previous tables in more than 110 cases.

Pith tools