Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Lensing-like tensions in the Planck legacy release

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1912.06601 v2 pith:UGJUIOTT submitted 2019-12-13 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords lambdalensingconstraintssigmadatameasurementsreconstructionrelease
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

We analyze the final release of the Planck satellite data to constrain the gravitational lensing potential in a model-independent manner. The amount of lensing determined from the smoothing of the acoustic peaks in the temperature and polarization power spectra is 2$\sigma$ too high when compared with the measurements using the lensing reconstruction and 2.8$\sigma$ too high when compared with $\Lambda$CDM expectation based on the "unlensed" portion of the temperature and polarization power spectra. The largest change from the previous data release is the $\Lambda$CDM expectation, driven by improved constraints to the optical depth to reionization. The anomaly still is inconsistent with actual gravitational lensing, given that the lensing reconstruction constraints are discrepant independent of the model. Within the context of $\Lambda$CDM, improvements in its parameter constraints from lensing reconstruction bring this tension to 2.1$\sigma$ and from further adding baryon acoustic oscillation and Pantheon supernova data to a marginally higher 2.2$\sigma$. Once these other measurements are included, marginalizing this lensing-like anomaly cannot substantially resolve tensions with low-redshift measurements of $H_0$ and $S_8$ in $\Lambda$CDM, $\Lambda$CDM+$N_\mathrm{eff}$ or $\Lambda$CDM+$\sum m_\nu$; furthermore the artificial strengthening of constraints on $\sum m_\nu$ is less than 20%.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools