Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Recent Trends in the Use of Statistical Tests for Comparing Swarm and Evolutionary Computing Algorithms: Practical Guidelines and a Critical Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2002.09227 v1 pith:ZVQ35JJW submitted 2020-02-21 cs.NE stat.ME

classification cs.NEstat.ME
keywords statisticaltestsalgorithmsevolutionaryconclusionsintelligenceswarmtrends
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A key aspect of the design of evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms is studying their performance. Statistical comparisons are also a crucial part which allows for reliable conclusions to be drawn. In the present paper we gather and examine the approaches taken from different perspectives to summarise the assumptions made by these statistical tests, the conclusions reached and the steps followed to perform them correctly. In this paper, we conduct a survey on the current trends of the proposals of statistical analyses for the comparison of algorithms of computational intelligence and include a description of the statistical background of these tests. We illustrate the use of the most common tests in the context of the Competition on single-objective real parameter optimisation of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) 2017 and describe the main advantages and drawbacks of the use of each kind of test and put forward some recommendations concerning their use.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Robustness and Invariance of Hybrid Metaheuristics under Objective Function Transformations

    cs.NE 2025-09 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A CEC-2017 benchmark study claims DE-based hybrid optimizers remain robust under translation, scaling, rotation, and additive shifts, but the reported data are internally inconsistent and contain duplicated rows.

Pith tools