REVIEW 2 cited by
Graph structure via local occupancy
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The first author together with Jenssen, Perkins and Roberts (2017) recently showed how local properties of the hard-core model on triangle-free graphs guarantee the existence of large independent sets, of size matching the best-known asymptotics due to Shearer (1983). The present work strengthens this in two ways: first, by guaranteeing stronger graph structure in terms of colourings through applications of the Lov\'asz local lemma; and second, by extending beyond triangle-free graphs in terms of local sparsity, treating for example graphs of bounded local edge density, of bounded local Hall ratio, and of bounded clique number. This generalises and improves upon much other earlier work, including that of Shearer (1995), Alon (1996) and Alon, Krivelevich and Sudakov (1999), and more recent results of Molloy (2019), Bernshteyn (2019) and Achlioptas, Iliopoulos and Sinclair (2019). Our results derive from a common framework built around the hard-core model. It pivots on a property we call local occupancy, giving a clean separation between the methods for deriving graph structure with probabilistic information and verifying the requisite probabilistic information itself.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Sharp bounds for the fractional chromatic number of high-girth $d$-degenerate graphs
For d-degenerate C4-free graphs, the fractional chromatic number is at most (1+o(1))d/log d, and for every fixed girth at least 4 there are d-degenerate graphs with fractional chromatic number at least (1−o(1))d/log d.
-
"I'm Not Able to Be There for You": Emotional Labour, Responsibility, and AI in Peer Support
Peer supporters bear concentrated emotional labor from institutional ambiguity and judge AI by its effects on redistributing responsibility and risk within fragile support roles.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.