REVIEW 1 cited by
Large induced trees in dense random graphs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Erd\H{o}s and Palka initiated the study of the maximal size of induced trees in random graphs in 1983. They proved that for every fixed $0<p<1$ the size of a largest induced tree in $G_{n,p}$ is concentrated around $2\log_q (np)$ with high probability, where $q=(1-p)^{-1}$. De la Vega showed concentration around the same value for $p=C/n$ where $C$ is a large constant, and his proof also works for all larger $p$. We show that for any given tree $T$ with bounded maximum degree and of size $(2-o(1))\log_q(np)$, $G_{n,p}$ contains an induced copy of $T$ with high probability for $n^{-1/2}\ln^{10/9}n\leq p\leq 0.99$. This is asymptotically optimal.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Concentration of the maximum size of an induced subtree in moderately sparse random graphs
For p = n^{-(e-2)/(3e-2)+ε}, the maximum induced tree size in G(n,p) is concentrated at two adjacent values.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.